Every Scientific Law We Have Today Will Be Have to Be Rewritten in the Next 50 Years*

Every Scientific Law We Have Today Will Be Have to Be Rewritten in the Next 50 Years*

By Michael Forrester

There is a simple reason why science has a very naive understanding of ourselves and our universe. It can only discover correlations, not causation. It does not have a concept of quantum measurements.

It has no tools to measure quantum fields. Since everything in the universe happens at a quantum level, science as we know it is only able to breach concepts originating from how relationships function at a rudimentary level, but not why those relationships exist.

[Modern] Science and its conclusions are one-dimensional and there lies its greatest limitation and ignorance, and thus it will never supersede what humans already know about themselves.

Science is so far behind simple empirical observation, so far behind the actual functioning of the human body, so far behind anything remotely relating to the understanding of ourselves and our universe because it can’t assess the subatomic forces that guide all matter.

Science can’t even measure a quantum field or the functioning of more than 90% of our DNA and yet we expect it to be able to determine what a cure is? It is not conceptual so it can’t.

Quantum theory is generally regarded as one of the most successful scientific theories ever formulated, but the majority of scientists fail to embrace many of the concepts and realize that there is no other reality except the one produced by quantum consciousness.

Quantum physics informs us that a system exists in superposition — that is, in all possible states — until we observe that it is only in one specific state.

One of the most beautiful experiments in physics is one that elegantly demonstrated how observation affects quantum systems: The double slit experiment.

The double slit sets aside causality, determinism, and the notion that reality is “out there” as it blurs the line between the observer and the system being observed.

In the double slit experiment, researchers found that light and matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles; moreover, it displays the fundamentally probabilistic nature of quantum mechanical phenomena. It is well explained in the video below.

One of the problems with scientific query is that it more often than not dismisses everything that does not fall into its little box of logic. We can’t prove it if we can’t test it! So when science doesn’t understand something, or encounters the unknown, it places it in the same box to try and interpret its meaning.

The problem is, what science doesn’t know or appreciate (with current technology) is that the most defining concepts in the universe don’t fit into a logical box of linearity. They can’t. They’re quantum. They’re multi-dimensional as is the planet and everything in it.

What studies have failed to address on the planet is causation based on this quantum level. They have tried through many different methods to obtain conclusive results in their scientific research through a countless number of double blind, placebo controlled and random studies which are considered the highest standards for scientific experiment.

Still today, there has never been one published scientific study based on this standard that has identified causation beyond sub-atomic levels. Yet it is precisely those levels that cause everything to manifest in the physical body and our environment as it does.

Science can only derive correlations because it does not address energetic causation which is the underlying mechanism behind every single experience and event whether physical or non-physical.

100% of our health, disease and all experience is based on energetic components within our field. There is NO other cause of disease. Diseases are primarily third dimensional experiences and will cease to exist when we learn to maintain vibrational levels at higher frequencies, and we are.

We separate chemistry, physics and so many other sciences when they are all integrated in ways even quantum scientists cannot fathom. Absolutely everything is connected and can thus be manipulated at the quantum level.

Scientists will rewrite all of their laws in the next 50 years once they obtain tools than can measure quantum energy. They will learn that consciousness, emotional states, love, compassion, hatred, fear are all measurable. Can you imagine the day when we can measure the emotional states of entire regions?

Human DNA is multi-dimensional at that the so-called “junk DNA” has a very specific function that connects us with everything that is. Does that mean you can control matter? Control gravity? Control the laws of physics as we know them? Yes, to all of them.

They will discover that sacred geometry creates all levels of consciousness, the divine nature of human beings and of course the physical world. Does it not amaze you that humans can only define things in straight lines?

Everything is from the linear perspective. But all things in this universe can bend. They don’t go straight. It seems the human brain has a difficult time grasping this concept and hence the limitation of sciences on planet Earth.

What about math? Do you think math in a multi-dimensional quantum field is the same as in a linear one? Quantum math is not influenced by empirical values but by the numbers around them.

A five is not a five, but is modified and influenced by the four, six and all the numbers around it. This means that the formula for a circle will no longer be Pi in quantum math. It will be a whole number.

Atomic densities and matter will no longer be seen as static. It will be possible to alter the mass of any object that exists. What people today call anti-gravity will simply be an object without mass. It will float and scientists will wonder why they never thought of it sooner.

Just as our bodies are expressions of our consciousness in a physical form, the physical geometric forms are representations of the original geometry of light that exists beyond the physical level.

On this original level beyond the physical, geometric forms fluidly transition into each other, representing how our consciousness continuously transcends and moves into higher and higher states of evolution.

The key element that ties the geometry together is that of the spiral, creating a tree of transcendent geometries that represent our true infinite nature and creating endless templates along the way.

These templates of creation manifest on the physical level in many forms. The physical manifestations are an archetypal expression of the energy fields beyond the physical. Sacred geometry in nature is then a tangible expression of the archetypal matrix of creation that acts as the building blocks of reality.

This will be a big one for scientists as many will learn in the coming few decades to factor energetic principles as causation before initiating any study.

Physics and chemistry will be rewritten and scientists will gain a better understanding of the effect of energetic resonance and its effects on all things. This will revolutionize science and remove many obstacles that have hindered scientific inquiry from progressing. The physics and the metaphysics will soon combine.

All will be understood in ways that were not possible for thousands of years and it will span across the globe.

There will be invention that benefit humanity to such an extent that they will transform the food we eat, the air we breathe, the transportation we use, but most of all how we interact as a species. Imagine that. And all it took was the understanding of a quantum field. It’s coming.

Source*

Related Topics:

The Science of Sound – Proves You Are a Cosmic Instrument*

DNA Editors Forget it, as Another Code is Discovered*

DNA Changing to Three and Four Strands*

‘Science’ Catches up with the Heart’s Intelligence*

Consciousness Science Kept Hidden*

Social sciences and the destruction of individuality

Why Gene Therapy and Designated Genetic Disorders is Tinkering and not Science!

Manipulating Science to Manipulate Us!

Psychology Research Really Is Just ‘Psycho-Babble’*

Paris Climate Change Conference shows Road to NWO Weather Control*

What They Haven’t Told You about Climate Change*

The Big Bang is Just a Theory, as New Equations Point to Infinity*

Thousands of Terrorists in Syria Flee to North Aleppo*

Thousands of Terrorists in Syria Flee to North Aleppo*

By Juan Cole

On Friday, the Syrian Arab Army and its Hizbullah and Iranian/ Afghan allies made further progress in taking the area just north of Aleppo.  They were apparently mainly fighting al-Qaeda, which had a stronghold in the city of Ratyan.  The Russians subjected it to intensive bombing and the SAA and allies ultimately took it.  Al-Qaeda (the Nusrah Front) said it had killed 25 of its attackers.

In New York, as the Syrian peace talks collapsed, the Russian envoy asked out loud why even the opposition was not happy at the defeat and rollback of al-Qaeda.

The answer is, of course, that the Nusra Front has a long history of winning battles against the Baath regime of Bashar al-Assad, and so it is useful to the opposition, even if it is, like, al-Qaeda.  Moreover, they don’t take its ties to Ayman al-Zawahiri, now the leader of the organization, very seriously.

Unfortunately for us, I think the U.S. is more or less indirectly backing al-Qaeda in Syria (not ISIL but the Nusra Front).

Jenane Moussa, who has reported from inside Syria, pointed out that government troops still hadn’t surrounded Aleppo to the east, and made us a map of what she thinks the situation looks like.

AFP interviews experts who concur that the Syrian regime is now likely to subject the 360,000 people in eastern Aleppo to a blockade and siege, as it had done successfully to Homs, until it can kill off the guerrillas opposing it.

The Syrian Human Rights observatory maintains that some 20,000 Syrians have fled the villages and small towns just north of Aleppo.  Several thousand are stuck on the Syria side at the main Turkish border checkpoint, in cold weather, and they face exposure.  Turkey, which already has 2.5 million Syrian refugees, has closed the border to them.

Source*

Related Topics:

European Parliament Calls for Action to Protect Religious Minorities against ISIS, “War Crimes” and “Crimes against Humanity”*

Syrian Army ends 3-year siege of 2 Shia Towns in Aleppo*

Russian Jets Hit 900 Terrorist Targets in Five Syrian Regions in Three Days*

Britain at Forefront of Deadly Mercenary Trade*

U.K. Gov to Invest an Extra £1.2bn in Syria*

Nusra Disintegrate as Hezbollah, Syrian Army Capture Tal Jibbin in Aleppo*

Turkish Artillery Shells Syrian Territory*

ISIS and Nusra Warring in East Lebanon*

Dutch Parliament Now Backs Illegally Bombing IS Targets in Syria*

Turkey-Russia Tensions Spike as Russia Moves into Rothschild-Murdoch Illegal Stake, Northern Syria*

U.S. Threatens to Use Force in Syria as ‘Western Coalition is Falling Apart’*

Britain at Forefront of Deadly Mercenary Trade*

Britain at Forefront of Deadly Mercenary Trade*

By Michaela Whitton

British firms are at the forefront of a lethal mercenary trade with hundreds of private firms, employing thousands in a billion dollar private army industry. A new report by campaign group War on Want, titled “Mercenaries Unleashed: The brave new world of private military and security companies,” reveals how the vast industry of private military and security companies (PMSCs) has mushroomed to become a trade worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

With key posts often filled by ex-members of the military or intelligence services, the sinister trade burst onto the scene 15 years ago, following the declaration of a ‘war on terror’ and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Unsurprisingly, the shadowy world is dominated by hundreds of U.K. companies reaping enormous profits from exploiting war, instability and conflict around the world.

John Hilary, Executive Director at War on Want, said:

“Private military contractors ran amok in Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving a trail of human rights abuses in their wake. Now we are seeing the alarming rise of mercenaries fighting on the front line in conflict zones across the world: it is the return of the ‘Dogs of War.’*

He added:

“For too long this murky world of guns for hire has been allowed to grow unchecked. In letting the industry regulate itself, the government has failed: only binding regulation will do. The time has come to ban these companies from operating in conflict zones and end the privatization of war.”

Back in 2006 — three years after the invasion of Iraq — War on Want published Private Armies, a report uncovering the role of mercenaries and PMSCs in the continuing occupation. It linked the rise of PMSCs with an increase in human rights abuses, a flourishing weapons trade and political destabilization.

As mercenary forces are given increasingly central roles in conflicts throughout the world, hundreds of millions of dollars are made for the corporations supplying them. Whole communities are condemned to the long-term poverty that comes with war while the misery profiteers grow richer.

Yet despite hundreds of cases of human rights abuses by mercenary forces over the years, private armies remain immune from prosecution.

The latest report detailing the developments in this shady world of “guns for hire” reveals an industry dominated by U.K. companies who exist, not only at the forefront of the conflict zones of the war on terror, but have expanded to Africa and the high seas.

It reveals a mushrooming trade which has seen hundreds of new companies established in the past few years alone. In addition, it explains how they are increasingly exploiting a legal loophole when it comes to use of arms in international waters.

Floating armouries are ships harboured at sea and stacked with rifles, ammunition, night vision goggles and other military grade equipment. There are 20 armouries currently on the Indian Ocean and the U.K. Department of Business, Innovation and Skills has issued 50 licenses for them. They are able to operate freely without fear of legal repercussions.

What’s most scary is that rather than introducing binding regulations of the billion-dollar privatization of war, the British government continues to allow the mercenaries to regulate themselves.

The use of private armies by governments and corporations was previously an exception. It is now becoming the norm, as states and companies seek to evade responsibility for the use of violent and often deadly force. The industry will continue to grow unchecked unless it is brought under control. – War on Want”

 Terrifying.

Source*

Related Topics:

U.S. Army Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson on Perpetual War to Maintain the Empire*

Putin Reveals ISIS Funded by 40 Countries, Including G20 Members*

Russia Tells the World about the NWO/CIA/MOSSAD/M16 Plan for Massacre in Paris*

Europe is Built on Corpses and Plunder*

British SAS Special Forces “Dressed Up as ISIS Rebels” Fighting Assad in Syria*

Illegal Mission Ends in 3 U.K. Forces Wounded in Iraq*

Cover-up of U.K.’s Role in Iraq Atrocities*

U.K. Illegally at War in Yemen*

U.S, U.K., Israel, China, Saudia behind Myanmar’s Rohingya Genocide*

Media Campaign for Cameron’s New War*

Reality of British Empire should be taught in Schools – Corbyn*

NYPD Uses 1970s ‘Nuisance Abatement’ Law to Throw Innocent Black Families Out of Their Homes*

NYPD Uses 1970s ‘Nuisance Abatement’ Law to Throw Innocent Black Families Out of Their Homes* 

In New York City, there is a form of police harassment and state terror employed against poor and working people — and overwhelmingly against Black people.  It’s called the “nuisance abatement” law. Get to know it.

Although the concept may be new to many people, it is an obscure law dating back to the 1970s that does not require any proof that a crime has taken place.  And this law allows the police to force people out of their homes and to forcibly separate families because one family member may be suspected of a crime, although no charges need be filed.  This is what is known as “collective punishment” in communities of colour, against innocent people who have committed no crimes — unless it is a crime to be Black and to live in New York, which apparently is the case.

A New York Daily News–ProPublica exposé provides the details of the unsavoury and unsettling police state that criminalizes and destroys so many innocent lives.  Originally used by the police to clamp down on the sex industry in Times Square, it is an understatement to say that nuisance abatement has been expanded to encompass residences and apartments, bodegas and corner stores.  Moreover, this was ramping up even as crime decreased in the city and reached all-time lows.  Of the 1,000 such cases filed by the New York Police Department each year, almost half are against residences, according to the Daily News–ProPublica report.

The investigation examined 516 residential nuisance abatement actions filed in state court between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2014, as well as the related criminal cases of hundreds of people who were evicted from their homes as a result.  In the 337 cases where an outcome could be determined, three-quarters of the tenants and homeowners lost or had vacated their homes.  Further, 173 of those who were thrown out of their homes or evicted were not convicted of a crime, and 44 were not criminally prosecuted at all.  In at least 74 cases, people who were subjected to such actions had agreed to a warrantless search of their premises, sometimes in perpetuity.  In addition, some people agreed to automatically give up their lease if merely accused of an offense in the future.

Nuisance abatement is, on the whole, not a punishment designed for white people, as 9 of every 10 communities subjected to the torturous actions were neighbourhoods of colour.  Of the 217 people whose race was identified — out of the 297 people barred from living in their homes — only five were white.  Judges were complicit, backing up the cops 75% of the time and signing off on the removal of people from their homes.

The toll taken on everyday people by this insidious policy is decisive and devastating:

A man was prohibited from living in his family home and from his young daughter over gambling allegations that were dismissed in criminal court. A diabetic man said he was forced to sleep on subways and stoops for a month after being served with a nuisance abatement action over low-level drug charges that also never led to a conviction. Meanwhile, his elderly mother was left with no one to care for her.

The report notes that because the nuisance abatement action is a civil matter separate from the underlying so-called criminal activity the police allege, the burden of proof is lower than in a criminal matter.  And yet, people lose their homes because of suspected crimes they have not committed, and the damage is done even when they have been cleared of any wrongdoing.  But that is not the point of the law.

“The law does not require criminal conviction, does not require [a] particular disposition of a criminal case, does not even require an arrest of anyone,” Lawrence Byrne, NYPD’s Deputy Commissioner of Legal Matters told the Daily News last year.

“You have to remember, it’s an action about a place. It’s not about people,” said Assistant Commissioner Robert Messner, head of the NYPD’s Civil Enforcement Unit.

 

Police commissioner William Bratton, who was a cheerleader for the policy when he served as top cop under Mayor Rudy Giuliani in the 1990s, was brought back into that position under Mayor Bill de Blasio in 2014. Nuisance abatement is part and parcel of “broken windows” policing that holds that if a window is left broken, you will find other windows broken as well.  So, the way to address large-scale crime, the argument goes, is to crack down on low-level offenses.  It is a school of thought promulgated by conservative think tanks and other similarly perverse laboratories, where mad social scientists conjure up white supremacist schemes for dealing with Blacks and Latinos.  One must notice that those who promote such unjust laws — white, reactionary law-and-order types — are not actually subjected to this treatment, nor were they the intended targets.  Rather, Black and Latino folks have been subjected to broken windows through the sweeping “stop and frisk” practices reserved solely for young people of color, ostensibly in the name of the war on drugs, as well as summons and arrests that target people for “quality-of-life” offenses as innocuous and inconsequential as drinking a beer in front of one’s home.

As for a nuisance abatement action, while officials in other cities cannot initiate one before giving the landlord an opportunity to solve the problem, and involving all parties in a court process, things are different in New York.  The NYPD makes an emergency appeal to a civil judge in the absence of the landlord or tenant, with allegations of dangers posed by drug dealing, gambling or some other activity.  The police ask permission to lock residents out of their homes until the situation is resolved, with “temporary closing orders” for an “ongoing illegal manner,” and that the “public health, safety and welfare require immediate abatement of the public nuisance.”  Affidavits that describe three instances of an offense during the course of a year — often based solely on confidential informants or undercover officers — are enough to send Black families out into the streets.  In 17 nuisance abatement actions against residences and 64 cases against businesses, there were no documented arrests.

In 1995, Bratton celebrated nuisance abatement actions as “probably the most powerful civil tool available to the police” under broken windows policing, allowing officers to “sweep down on a location and close it without warning.”  And as the Daily News and ProPublica revealed, since that time the city has witnessed a quintupling in the number of nuisance abatement actions filed each year.  Moreover, while Bratton has altered other elements of the NYPD quality-of-life regime, nuisance abatements have continued, and that is the real crime.  And one must wonder why he is still the head of the NYPD, and why this outrageous practice was not eliminated yesterday.

Source*

Related Topics:

U.N. Team ‘Concerned’ About African Americans*

Banksters are Buying Baltimore’s Debt, Hiking Interest then Taking Families’ Homes*

Black History Month and Indigenous Americans*

300 Plumbers Volunteer to Help Flint’s Most Vulnerable Residents for Free*

Obama Anaesthetizing Black Resistance*

Black Female Activist Falsely Accused of Lynching*

Black Wall Street*

Discovering Black Identity*

Pentagon Admits 60,000 Black Soldiers Used in Human Experiment*

Muslim Charities Are Helping To Raise Money for Burned Black Churches In The US*

Leading #BlackLivesMatter Activists Arrested*

Arrested and Held in Psych Ward Because Cops Didn’t Believe as a Black Woman She Owns BMW*

Black-Palestinian Alliance Emerges to Confront Global Violence and Racism*

Serena Williams To #BlackLivesMatter ‘Keep It Up’*

White Supremacists Behind Mass Shootings at Black Churches and Synagogues*

Water as a Weapon in Baltimore*

People’s Power Defends Detroit Homeowners*

New Zealand’s ‘The Natural Health Supplementary Products Bill’ Bans Natural Products*

New Zealand’s ‘The Natural Health Supplementary Products Bill’ Bans Natural Products*

This is a very complex Bill with many unacceptable aspects. Due to the need for brevity and clarity we have restricted our comments mainly to aspects that will affect consumers.

Summary

The third reading of the Natural Health and Supplementary Products Bill is imminent. This Bill will ban most Natural Health Product (NHP) ingredients without just cause.

NHPs in NZ are presently regulated under a ‘Black-list’ (a short list of banned substances that have shown evidence of harm). We currently have the right to consume any Natural Health ingredients not on the ‘Black-list’, which gives us access to an unquantifiably high number of ingredients with no history of harm.

Under the new Bill this present ‘Black-list’ approach will be replaced by a new ‘White-list’ approach, with a very limited ‘White-list’ of ‘permitted ingredients’. Any ingredient that is not on this permitted ‘White-list will not be allowed to be sold in NZ

Many Natural Health Products will disappear if they contain even one ingredient that is not on their ‘Permitted White-list’. Many suppliers will also disappear as a result.

Any NHP ingredient that is recognised as having therapeutic (health improving) effect can be re-classified as a medicine by the MoH. Once it is classed as a medicine, it will be black-listed for use in Natural Health products. (This is already happening)

There is no accountability for harm or death as a result of consumers losing healthcare products that they depend on. There are no provisions in the Bill to make allowances for this if it does happen.

You can provide feedback to the Government on the Bill, sign a petition on www.Change.org and sign up with HFNZ for updates on this important matter.

Discussion

The passing of the Natural Health and Supplementary Products Bill will result in many Natural Health Products becoming either severely restricted (via new proposed low dosage limits), or being made outright illegal in NZ.

All of the following contain one or more ingredients that do not appear on the list provided by the Ministry of Health, meaning consumers will no longer be able to purchase these products.

These are just a few examples that have been sent to us by consumers:

Liposomal Vit C,

Liposomal Glutathione,

Truehope EMPowerplus,

Hardy Nutritionals Daily Essential Nutrients,

5-HTP – all products,

L-Methionine – all products,

Metagenics Azeo-Pangen,

MediHerb TyAdren Support,

Pure Encapsulations Ascorbyl Palmitate,

Go Healthy Go Prostate Protect,

Syntol AMD,

Douglas Laboratories De-Mer-Tox,

Future Formulations Inner Healing.

We invite readers to contribute to this list by emailing us at Info@HealthFreedom.co.nz

Natural Health Practitioners will be unable to properly practice as they will no longer be able to prescribe to their patients’ needs.

The Ministry has stated in the consultation document that products made by a practitioner for an individual patient will be exempt from the Bill – including Rongoā Māori and Traditional Chinese Medicine – but that these same products will not be allowed to be sold over the counter.

However New Zealand Health Trust’s interpretation of the Supplementary Order Paper (the most up-to-date version of the Bill) differs from this entirely in that Māori health practitioners and others using traditional herbal and other remedies to administer to an individual will be unable to use non-permitted ingredients.

We feel this is a classic example of how unreliable and misleading the Ministry’s information is in relation to this Bill. To make matters even more uncertain the Bill is crafted to allow most of the detail to be added AFTER the Bill has been passed!

Products presently classified as ‘Practitioner Only Range’ will not be exempt from the ingredient restrictions.

The proposed financing model of the new system presents significant risk to the majority of NZ small business supplement manufacturers, an outcome likely to result in only a small handful of large manufacturers remaining viable. This will result in a significant loss of variety of product in the natural supplements market in NZ.

The new regulatory system will be funded by industry on a Full Cost Recovery Basis by annual registration charges on all products. Note that there have never been any registration charges before.

These charges will rise as the range of products decreases due to the ‘White-list’ restrictions. Short run products will become economically unviable and thus will be discontinued, forcing smaller operators to close.

Every time a manufacturer reduces its product range or closes its doors, the remaining products and remaining manufacturers will have to shoulder more of the financial burden of funding the agency. The biggest players will benefit from this approach, as they can afford the fees – and this approach will increase their market share. This is one reason why large manufacturers support this bill.

Presently in Australia under the TGA it costs manufacturers $40,000 – $150,000 just to apply for one ingredient to be accepted on their White-list, with no guarantee of success.

There is little incentive to make an application because, if successful, a manufacturers’ competitors are able to benefit at no cost to them. And as only one or two ingredients per year have ever been passed by the TGA, manufacturers are discouraged from even trying. There is no reason to believe that this will not also apply here in NZ should the Bill be passed.

The Pharma based ‘single ingredient approach’, which is the framework of the Bill, is inappropriate and misleading for two reasons:

1. It does not reflect the fact that when NHP ingredients are consumed together, higher doses can be safely tolerated above the consumption of a single ingredient.

2. If any one ingredient in a product exceeds a specified dose, then the entire product will be outlawed in NZ. Most supplements have multiple ingredients, affecting a huge number of supplements that New Zealanders are already relying on for their health and well-being.

The Bill will allow Medsafe (the business unit of the Ministry of Health) to increase its control over NHPs by the following means:

It will reverse the basic historic principle confirming our rights to consume any natural health ingredient that is absent from a short defined ‘Black-list’ of substances where there is robust evidence of harm.

The number of ingredients we can currently access is too high to quantify, yet no deaths have been attributed to these ingredients or products (see “No Deaths from Supplements. No Deaths from Minerals. No Deaths from Amino Acids. No Deaths from Herbs” http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v12n02.shtml)

Our present system will be replaced by a ‘White-list’ of permitted ingredients and only ingredients on this list will be sold in NZ. Furthermore, many permitted ingredients have severe dosage and application restrictions placed upon them. There is no scientific reasoning or justification for such limitations, and no history of risk to human health.

The proposed ‘White-list’ currently contains 5,545 ingredients. This may sound like a lot, but to indicate what this means in terms of what we stand to lose, we only need to add up a small handful of the numerous categories of currently permitted ingredients to appreciate the magnitude of loss. There are so far over 8,000 identified Polyphenols, over 3,000 Enzymes and over 12,000 Medicinal Plants. These few examples alone make it easy to see that only a small fraction of our current range of natural ingredients will remain, should this legislation be enacted.

Permitted Ingredients ‘White-list’ File

It is vitally important for you to check if any ingredients that you presently use in your supplements are not on the permitted list.

Which ingredients do YOU rely on? Check them out here. Or here in Excel spreadsheet form.

You can search the file by entering the ingredient name, or searching alphabetically in the Excel Spreadsheet. If the ingredient is not on the list at all, then it will not be permitted in over-the-counter products. Also check the maximum permitted daily dose, and whether it will be permitted for internal or external application only.

What the Columns Mean

In the ‘Outcome’ column

– ‘Y’ means ‘Permitted’ (but make sure you check the maximum permitted amount, and the application, e.g. Glutathione (an important antioxidant) is permitted, but only for applying to the skin),
– ‘N’ means ‘Unaccepted’,
– ‘U’ means ‘Under Review’.

If the ‘Reason’ column states ‘rejected by IJEACCM on safety grounds’ – IJEACCM stands for ‘The Interim Joint Expert Advisory Committee on Complementary Medicines’, a NZ/Australian initiative.

What is the Background to this Bill?

There has been a de facto pharmaceutical monopoly on medicines for almost 100 years.

When we become ill we need medicines. But pharmaceutical medicines are dangerous and can cause substantial harm.

The monopoly has endured and grown stronger due to laws that have been passed. There have been many discoveries made over those 100 years that offered safer, cheaper and more effective treatments than the pharmaceutical options, but the regulators have always stepped in to prosecute, confiscate product and even imprison the people who made or used the discovery.

Very occasionally the regulators’ attempts to destroy a new discovery are not completely successful, and a natural alternative flourishes for a few years. But the Big Pharma lobbyists respond and it doesn’t take long for new laws to be drafted that strengthen the monopoly and the status quo remains.

We can’t prevent Big Pharma and their lobbyists from trying to maintain and strengthen their position. They are very much aware of the impact that an appropriately regulated Natural Health Product industry would have on their market share. They have a duty to their shareholders to prevent natural medicines from entering the market.

But our elected MPs need to wake up and stop passing such laws. The Natural Health and Supplementary Products Bill is Pharma-based and hostile to the interests of the consumer and the Natural Health industry.

Consumers stand to be the biggest losers if this Bill is passed. There are many importers, manufacturers and re-sellers who do not oppose the bill for fear of retribution, as a lot of the fine print will be decided after it has been passed. They hope to be able to stay in business with reduced ranges and less effective products.

Consumers on the other hand, stand to lose access to life saving Natural Health Products.

NHPs can save lives in several ways, from helping people to stay well so the need for pharmaceutical intervention doesn’t arise (the death toll from adverse reactions to properly prescribed pharmaceutical medicines is over 100,000 a year in the USA alone) to products that are capable of returning seriously ill people back to good health.

Health Freedom NZ supports the aims and proposed legislative model of the New Zealand Health Trust. Their mission is to ensure that the consumer comes first in all health regulation, and that Natural Health should be regulated through a stand-alone regulator, not as a division of a larger pharmaceutical or food regulator. When you run this bill through the NZHT checklist of appropriate regulation it fails on every count.

What Can You Do?

This Bill will soon have its third and final reading to become law, and is expected to take effect around June 2016. The Regulations are expected to come into force shortly afterwards.

The Government is asking for public feedback on the Bill

The consultation document contains a list of 47 questions and a “consultation submission” can be filled out online.

However HFNZ recommends that the questions should not be answered because the regime is fundamentally flawed and engaging in the detail implicitly validates this unsuitable regulatory model.

For those who have limited time to prepare a submission and wish to oppose the Bill in principle, click the link below for a short pre-prepared submission.  We recommend you personalise your submission as much as possible.

SEND submissions to naturalhealthproducts@moh.govt.nz

Should you require additional time to make a submission, you should request an extension of time from the Ministry:

  1. Submissions on the Consultation Document close at 5pm on Friday 4 March 2016

    2. Submissions on the Draft List of Conditions about which a claim can be made & the Draft Permitted List will open on 6 Feb 2016 and close on 31 May 2016.

You can make a submission by emailing: naturalhealthproducts@moh.govt.nz

Or by posting your submission to:

Natural Health Products
Ministry of Health
PO Box 5013
Wellington 6145

Sign and Share the Petition Started by Professor Julia Rucklidge

This is on www.Change.org.  Simply add your first name, last name, email, city (and reason if you like) to the text box on the right of the page, then click Sign. https://www.change.org/p/naturalhealthproducts-moh-govt-nz-keep-access-to-nutrients-in-nz-that-have-a-proven-safety-record-and-therapeutic-benefit

We invite all consumers who want to be kept informed of developments and help to save our right of access to Natural Health ingredients to sign up for the Health Freedom Newsletter.

Source*

Related Topics:

Maori Elder Sends TPPA Partners, Queen A Formal Notice of Veto of Trade Agreement*

Deadline to Keep Homeopathy as a Health Choice*

You are in the Throes of Being Denied the Right to Good Health!

Canada Clamps Down on Healthy Living!

Sowing Seeds of Health, Hope and Humanity*

Falling Profits and Desperate Junk Food Companies Make Fun of Healthy Diets*

Criminalizing Healthy Food Paves Way for TPP*

Why is Vladimir Putin Meeting War Monger Kissinger?

Why is Vladimir Putin Meeting War Monger Kissinger?

Related Topics

Russia Says No to One-World Government*

Ban Ki-moon Wants Russia to Join America’s War on Humanity*

Putin’s Address to the U.N. in 10 Quotes*

Brzezinski to Putin: Stop hitting OUR al-Qaeda or it’s World War III*

Putin Blows the Whistle on the Who and the Why of ISIS*

U.S. on Russia’s Borders Trying to Provoke War*

As far as Honour Goes U.S. has None: Tries to Bait Russia with Lifting of Sanctions for Russian Withdrawal from Syria*

Russia has had enough: No more ‘business as usual’ with U.S.*

Media Campaign for Cameron’s New War*

Media Campaign for Cameron’s New War*

David Cameron is deciding whether to ask the U.K. if he can wage another war, this time in Libya. His deliberation over military intervention in the country, comes just a couple of months after the heated vote in parliament on Cameron’s request for airstrikes in Syria.

That deeply contested win for the Prime Minister – MPs voted 397-223 in favour – had very little support from the U.K. public. So, the mainstream media have already dutifully begun pushing out pro-military action propaganda to make Cameron’s plea, if he makes it, more palatable this time around.

The debate on military action in Libya has gained momentum following a recent U.S. intelligence assessment. Reportedly, an anonymous defence official has claimed the findings show ISIS (Daesh) is declining in Iraq and Syria, but gaining ground in Libya. On Tuesday, U.S. secretary of state John Kerry said:

“We’re still not at the victory that we want to achieve and will achieve in either Syria or Iraq, and we have seen Daesh playing a game of metastasizing out to other countries, particularly Libya…The last thing in the world you want is a false caliphate with access to billions of dollars of oil revenue.”

France is also said to be keen to move towards a military solution, and Italy has suggested it would consider being involved. In fact, Algerian newspaper al-Khabar recently reported that the U.S., U.K., and France, have already informed the Algerian government that they are planning airstrikes on Daesh in Libya – although their claim could not be independently verified.

Bomb first, think later

As the last decade and a half have shown, it is not unusual for western governments to use military action as a first resort, rather than last. They also often refuse to learn lessons from past wars. However, with the U.K.’s Syrian intervention very much a current issue, it’s ‘success’ should be taken into account when considering the prospect of strikes in Libya.

So, have the Syrian strikes been successful? Not at all, actually quite the opposite. As writer Tom Pride has pointed out, the strikes have even been criticised by anti-Daesh groups within the region. A Syrian journalist, working with RBBS – a collective of citizen journalists reporting from the ground – commented:

“Increases every day the number of air strikes on the city, and the misfortune of civilians. Most of the strikes targeted the National Hospital, the largest hospital in the city and the lifeline for all; today the National Hospital became completely out of service, and disease has become a calamity.”

Admittedly, it’s difficult to know which country carried out the strikes the journalist mentions, because there are so many militarily involved in Syria. In fact, Tom Pride points out that very few U.K. strikes have actually occurred, because of a lack of available targets in a battle with so many players. Extraordinarily, the UK even targeted oil fields that were already supposedly “obliterated” by Russia – that’s how sparse genuine targets actually are.

What the strikes have been successful in, is giving Daesh the anti-western propaganda they need to flourish. This is true in Syria and Iraq, and would certainly apply to Libya. Dr Arturo Varvelli, Head of Terrorism and Research Fellow at the Italian Institute for International Political Studies, spoke to Sputnik news on the matter:

“An external intervention could help ISIS [Daesh] in Libya to enlarge the cooperation with other radical groups — IS could then become stronger”

Seemingly, such cooperation between radical groups in Libya is already starting to happen, amid the discourse on intervention.

Hungry for more war

Despite the serious questions, and flaws, that need to be addressed before an intervention in Libya is decided, the mainstream media has already begun a propaganda campaign to justify the action. News outlets are pushing the narrative that a Daesh “surge” is occurring in Libya, where top Daesh commanders are “taking refuge“, and “control and crucifixions” dominate daily life. As Media Lens have identified:

The BBC is pulling no punches in their manipulation of the public mind. They have even made clear how readers should feel about their reporting on life in Libya:

“Warning: You may find some of the content below disturbing”

It is questionable that the media have taken such a strong, and dramatic, interest in exposing the troubles in Libya, at the very point when western leaders are looking to justify intervention. Even more suspicious is the lack of media attention being given to the giant Libyan elephant in the room. Journalist Glenn Greenwald sums this up with perfect ridicule here:

Daesh was handed the opportunity to flourish in Libya by the western military intervention in 2011 that toppled – in the most brutal fashion – its leader Muammar Gaddafi. Political analyst, Hafsa Kara, explained to Sputnik news:

“One of the reasons ISIS is in Libya is precisely because of the NATO onslaught of 2011 which led to a power vacuum in which terrorist organizations such as ISIS actually thrive…It was hugely predictable that this would happen given the Iraqi scenario of ten years before.”

The suggestion that Daesh will be defeated by the same actions that ensured its rise in the first place is utter insanity. Regardless, the media will bang the war drum in line with their governments tune in typical fashion, as we saw in the reporting leading up to the Syrian strikes. Let’s hope the public sees through this, and presses on their government the total lunacy of military intervention in Libya.

Source*

Related Topics:

No Confidence Vote in David Cameron Passes 170,000 Signatures*

Europe is Built on Corpses and Plunder*

U.S. Special ops Forces Told to Leave Libya after Arriving*

U.S. Helps ISIS Gain New Stronghold in Libya*

Libyans Tell Obama ‘Thanks for destroying our country’*

Statement on the UK Government’s Military Involvement in Libya

Statement on the Invasion of the African State of Libya By the Imperialist Forces

The War Against Libya in Historical Perspective

Libya: Condemnation of Assassination By Imperialist Forces

Libya: 11 Imams From Peace Mission Massacred

Libya: Anatomy of a Murder