Muslims Arrested for Joining Terror Group That Doesn’t Exist*

Muslims Arrested for Joining Terror Group That Doesn’t Exist*

By Carlos Sardiña Galache and Veronica Pedrosa

The government of Myanmar, cracking down on the country’s minority Muslims, has arrested at least a dozen people on charges of belonging to a terrorist group that defense lawyers and security experts say does not exist.

The administration of President Thein Sein has refused to disclose any evidence that the “Myanmar Muslim Army” is real — raising the prospect that the government invented an Islamic terrorist threat to justify a new front in its longtime persecution of Muslims. The exact number of people arrested is unclear, but The Intercept has obtained documents and conducted interviews in Myanmar about three cases — one of them involves 12 people accused of having links to the alleged group, the second involves five people accused of plotting to plant bombs in several unspecified places in the country, and the third is against a man accused of funding the group. All of them were arrested between September and November.

“The accused have received training in Myanmar Muslim Army camps, which has been launched and is operating illegally,” reads one of the court documents obtained by The Intercept.

Officially, about 4 percent of the country’s population is Muslim, but the actual number is believed to be higher, perhaps as much as 10 percent. The largest Muslim population, the Rohingya ethnic group, is concentrated in Rakhine State in western Myanmar, while other Muslims are scattered all over the country. The Rohingya are the most persecuted group: the government has denied them citizenship for decades, and according to several human rights groups, they are the targets of an ethnic cleansing campaign that has helped prompt a desperate exodus by boat in which an estimated 300 people died in the first quarter of this year, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

But non-Rohingya Muslims also face discrimination even though they are citizens of Myanmar. In recent years, sporadic explosions of anti-Muslim violence have taken place outside Rakhine State. The Muslims accused of belonging to the “Myanmar Muslim Army” or plotting terrorist actions hail mostly from central and northern Myanmar.

After five decades of military rule, Myanmar launched in 2011 a process of political transition to what its generals have termed a “discipline-flourishing democracy.” A semi-civilian government made up of former generals was established, hundreds of political prisoners were released in successive amnesties, and the pro-democracy leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, was allowed to be elected to Parliament in by-elections held in 2012 after having spent 15 years under house arrest.

The transition has given the government a degree of international acceptance unthinkable a few years ago. In 2005, Condoleezza Rice, testifying at a Senate hearing to confirm her as secretary of state, included Myanmar in a list of “outposts of tyranny,” but in 2012 Barack Obama became the first U.S. president to visit the country, where he praised the transition process. Hillary Clinton has also visited Myanmar and admitted in her 2014 memoir that it’s “hard to resist getting breathless” about the country’s progress. The Myanmar government has even hired the image-polishing services of Podesta Group, a lobbying firm founded by John Podesta, the chairman of Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Nevertheless, improvements in political liberties for the country’s Buddhist majority coincides with a deterioration in conditions for the Muslim minority.

Muslims in Myanmar are widely framed within the Buddhist-majority country as foreigners, because a large portion of them are descendants of migrants from the Indian sub-continent. They are being portrayed by state officials and extreme Buddhist nationalist movements as outsiders and a common enemy, a narrative begun long ago, critics say, in order to distract attention from political conflicts created by the military dictatorship, which lacked popular legitimacy.

It was only when the Bush administration launched its “war on terror” in 2001 that Myanmar’s Muslims began to be presented as a potential terrorist threat; this was seen as a bid to win international favour at a time when the U.S. government was trying to isolate the military regime. Yet there was a glaring problem with the military regime’s portrayal of Muslims: there is no record of any actual terrorist attack by Muslims within Myanmar in recent decades.

Now, with the country in a period of transition applauded by the U.S. and other former foes, and with crucial elections to be held in November, the former generals who make up Myanmar’s government need more than ever to legitimize their grip on power, both in the international arena and among the Buddhist-dominated electorate. The emergence of a new terrorist threat gives new life to long-held claims by the military that they are the only guarantors of security in what they term their “discipline-flourishing democracy.”

Thien Sein, Myanmar’s president (AP Photo/Tatan Syuflana)


Soe Moe Aung’s whole family was asleep, when late on November 17, about six policemen broke into their house in Mandalay, Myanmar’s second biggest city. His mother, Nwe Ni Aung, recounted in an interview earlier this year that the police demanded the family hand over her 24-year-old son. She said neither the police, nor the soldiers who had surrounded the house, bothered to show them an arrest warrant. She didn’t see her son for about 10 days — he was in police custody and denied access to a lawyer — and learned only when his trial started that he was accused of belonging to the “Myanmar Muslim Army.”

“They accuse him of undergoing training in a camp, but I don’t think that’s possible,” she said in an interview in Mandalay. “He’s sick — he suffers from gout — so how could he have received any training?”

Soe Moe Aung’s lawyer, Nandar Myint Thein, is defending four additional suspects in the same trial in Mandalay; a total of 12 people are accused in the trial of belonging to the “Myanmar Muslim Army,” according to documents obtained by The Intercept. They’re charged under the Emergency Provisions Act, passed in 1950, and according to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (Burma) “commonly used to arbitrarily detain activists or criminalize dissent.”

Nandar Myint Thein claims the prosecution didn’t submit any “real evidence” and the accused signed confessions after days of torture in custody. She says most of the defendants didn’t even know each other before the trial.

“When I asked the prosecution’s witnesses [from the Police’s Special Branch] for evidence about the Myanmar Muslim Army, they answered that they couldn’t speak about it before the court … that this information came from above,” Nandar Myint Thein said.

In a recent interview for this article, the director of the Myanmar president’s office, Zaw Htay, defended the government’s position.

“The Home Affairs ministry has all the evidence on these activities, but we can’t make it public because this is a national security issue,” he said. When asked how the accused can expect a fair trial when the prosecution’s evidence is withheld in court, he answered,

“They have the right to appeal in upper courts.”

Zaw Htay declined to say how many people are believed to be members of the group — he said national security concerns prevented him from disclosing more information — but claimed

“there are many activities outside the country and they want to promote their terrorist attacks with some people inside the country, so right now we are doing a pre-emptive strike to protect ourselves against any possible attack.” Legal Aid Documentation Team, a civil society organization, claims that as of February, around 100 Muslims had been arrested on charges of terrorism since last year.

The existence of the “Myanmar Muslim Army” has not been confirmed by terrorism experts, human rights groups, or the U.S. State Department. Rohan Gunaratna, who heads the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research in Singapore, is the only one to have mentioned it, though fleetingly — he wrote in a recent report that “there also have been unconfirmed reports about the emergence of a new group called Myanmar Muslim Army (MMA), which is reportedly using Thai territory for training Myanmar Muslims.”

A State Department spokesperson said in an interview that the U.S. government “does not have any further information” beyond Gunaratna’s reference. Zachary Abuza, a specialist in security issues and politics in Southeast Asia, said he had never heard of the “Myanmar Muslim Army.”

“Sounds completely fictitious to me,” he said.

I would doubt that any group fighting the state would even use the term ‘Myanmar’ as that legitimizes the regime.”

Myanmar is the name given to the country by the military government in 1989, replacing Burma, and the new name is contested by critics of the regime.

“Based on the name and the track record of the Tatmadaw [armed forces], there is a very high likelihood that their ‘confessions’ were extracted through torture,” Abuza added.

One of the three cases involves Khin Maung Shwe, also known as Yusuf, who is accused of helping to establish the “Myanmar Muslim Army.” The 44-year-old businessman was detained in Mandalay in October, but his lawyer, Aung Naing Soe, said the case against his client is founded solely on confessions extracted while in military custody from other detainees who gave his interrogators the name “Yusuf” and little else. Aung Naing Soe says there is no further evidence against his defendant.

The prosecution in these cases has the backing of the minister of Home Affairs, citing the Emergency Provisions Act. The Intercept has obtained the minister’s signed authorization for the case involving Khin Maung Shwe, and defense lawyers say the minister signed the same authorization for the Mandalay case. The Intercept has also obtained the minister’s authorization for a case involving five people accused of planning to make fertilizer bombs.

“That’s a big burden for the accused, because the court is afraid of not following orders from the minister himself,” said Aung Naing Soe.

In the context of Myanmar’s judicial system, the direct involvement of the Home Affairs minister isn’t an innocent matter of oversight, it’s an expression of the overarching power the military continues to exert over all aspects of life in Myanmar. The constitution requires the Home Affairs minister to be a member of the military, nominated by the commander in chief of the armed forces, which are constitutionally shielded from any civilian oversight. As the International Commission of Jurists noted in a report published in 2013, “political and military influence over judges remains a major impediment to lawyers’ ability to practice their profession effectively. Depending on the nature of the case, judges render decisions based on orders coming from government and military officials.”

Sam Zarifi, regional director of Asia and the Pacific at the ICJ, explained that “there’s every reason to fear for the rights of the accused to receive a fair trial” in these cases, noting that “judicial independence has been undermined by the executive branch’s undue influence and interference, in particular, in politically sensitive cases, including criminal ones.”

Another case in Yangon, Myanmar’s biggest city and former capital, involves Muslims allegedly planning to wage armed struggle. In September last year, five Muslims were detained over smuggling fertilizer. The prosecution claims the fertilizer was intended to fabricate explosives to plant several bombs in Myanmar. One of the accused is a shopkeeper who bought fertilizer from another defendant, according to his lawyer.

The lawyer, Robert Sann Aung, said the suspects were held by the military for three months and tortured to extract confessions. Like other lawyers interviewed for this article, he claims there is no evidence of a terrorism plot, other than the fertilizer itself and the confessions. When asked about his expectations, Robert Sann Aung gave little reason for optimism.

“I won’t win this case,” he said.

“I would win if the judge applied the law, but law is not going to be applied.”


Related Topics:

The Truth about Dalai Lama

Buddhist Massacre of Rohingya Muslims Continue*

A Tragic ‘Eid for Thai Muslims*

Unholy Trinity United States-Israel- Saudi Arabia Sowing Discord amongst Muslims*

Four Million Muslims Killed and Counting since 1990*

China orders Muslim Businesses to Sell Cigarettes and Alcohol*

Apology to German Muslims from the PEGIDA Movement*

Does Muslim Outrage have a Colour?

The Persecuted Muslims the World Ignores*

Uyghur Muslims Punished for Fasting in Holy Month*

Muslims and Christians March against ISIL*

22 Years of Fake “Islamic Terror”*

Top 10 Ways Islamic Law Forbids Terrorism*

Gay’ Men and Boy Scouts*

Gay’ Men and Boy Scouts*

By J. Matt Barber

I said it was coming. Many of us did. Two years ago this week the Boy Scouts of America voted to welcome into its ranks “open and avowed” homosexuality (boy-on-boy sexual attraction and behaviour), thereby disavowing the “morally straight” Scout Oath its members are sworn to uphold.

Shortly thereafter I warned, “In so doing, the [Boy Scouts of America (BSA)] effectively waived the only legal defense it once had to preclude openly homosexual Scout leaders and gender-confused girls from its ranks: religious and moral conviction. It’s only a matter of time until the BSA is forced to capitulate to sexual extremists’ political demands and allow homosexual adults ­ men who define their identity based upon carnal appetites for other males ­ to take your boys on overnight camping trips.”

It’s happened. On Thursday BSA President Robert Gates announced that the organization’s unconditional surrender to the homofascist left is forthcoming and that the BSA will soon invite men who have sex with males (MSM) to become troop leaders.

“The status quo in our movement’s membership standards cannot be sustained,” Gates disingenuously claimed, indicating that to maintain the BSA’s century-old proscription on “out” homosexual men would spell “the end of us as a national movement.”

This, of course, is hyperbolic nonsense and simply reflects a continuation of Gates’ long-standing pro-homosexual activism. While serving as secretary of defense he both advocated for and oversaw the implementation of the full repeal of the military’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy. This has effectively homosexualized the U.S. military, resulting in rampant anti-Christian discrimination and an explosion (a 33 percent spike) in male-on-male homosexual assaults. Does any honest, sane, thinking person imagine that a comparable increase in homosexual assault will not befall the Boy Scouts?

Michael Brown, Ph.D., is an expert on both homosexual activism and the disordered behaviours that define the homosexual lifestyle. He is author of such books as, “Can You Be Gay and Christian?” and the upcoming “Outlasting the Gay Revolution: Where Homosexual Activism Is Really Going and How to Turn the Tide.”

In an interview with WND, Dr. Brown said that he “believes if the Boy Scouts accept openly homosexual leaders, they will cease to be a positive moral force in the lives of American boys.”

Stated Brown: “This opens the door for sexual predators, a real danger, and it opens the door for gay boys to be flirting with straight boys under the auspices of the Boy Scouts.”

The BSA has already been plagued by a long history of man-on-boy homosexual assaults perpetrated by closeted Scout leaders. The shocking extent of the abuse has only recently been exposed as the BSA has worked hard to cover up the scandal.

Parents, the BSA is about to place political correctness above your child’s safety to a level unprecedented in the once-honorable organization’s long and storied history. This is not an opinion. It’s an empirical, quantifiable certainty.

Consider, for instance, a study published in the left-leaning Archives of Sexual Behaviour, of over 200 convicted paedophiles. It found that

“86 percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.”

This demonstrates, as observes Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council: “Since almost 30 percent of child sexual abuse is committed by homosexual or bisexual men (one-third male-on-male abuse times 86 percent identifying as homosexual or bisexual), but less than 3 percent of American men identify themselves as homosexual or bisexual, we can infer that homosexual or bisexual men are approximately 10 times more likely to molest children than heterosexual men.”

This makes perfect sense when coupled with another 2001 study in the same peer-reviewed publication. It found that nearly half of all “gay”-identified men who participated in research were molested by a homosexual paedophile as boys:

“46 percent of homosexual men and 22 percent of homosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender. This contrasts to only 7 percent of heterosexual men and 1 percent of heterosexual women reporting having been molested by a person of the same gender.”

(View this shocking hidden-camera footage of “gay” men admitting that they weren’t “born that way,” but that they were “made that way” through childhood sexual assault.)

The connection between homosexual abuse and “gay identity” is undeniable. Although clearly not all “gay”-identified men and women abuse children, or were abused as children, the verifiable reality is that an alarmingly high percentage of them do and were. As with most forms of abuse, the cycle is both circular and vicious. “Born that way?” Not so much. “Made that way?” Sadly, it appears so.

Yet the BSA will not let facts get in the way of its extremist sexual agenda.

“We must deal with the world as it is, not as we might wish it to be,” Gates said on Thursday.

Absolute garbage. This is not the world as it is. This is a world of the secular left’s making. I will again predict here that the BSA will soon open its ranks to sexually confused girls. Earlier this month the Girl Scouts of America similarly announced that it will allow boys pretending to be girls to join its ranks.

Parents, you’ve been warned. If you leave your children in the Boy or Girls Scouts of America, anything that might happen is on your head.

Dr. Brown agrees: “Given the new direction of the Boy Scouts, Brown urges parents to seek out an alternative,” reports WND.

Urged Brown: “Now would be a great time to find out more about the Christian boy scouts alternative, Trail Life USA.”

Indeed, Trail Life’s Membership Standards state, without equivocation,

“The basis for the program’s ethical and moral standards are found in the Bible. In terms of sexual identification and behaviour, we affirm that any sexual activity outside the context of the covenant of marriage between one man and one woman is sinful before God and therefore inconsistent with the values and principles of the program.

“Within these limits, we grant membership to adults and youth who do not engage in or promote sexual immorality of any kind, or engage in behaviour that would become a distraction to the mission of the program.”

Trail Life’s chairman, John Stemberger, says his organization is “saddened” by Gates’ announcement.

“It is tragic that the BSA is willing to risk the safety and security of its boys because of peer pressure from activists groups,” he said. “Trail Life USA remains committed to timeless Christian values.”

And the BSA remains committed to child-endangerment and extremist sexual activism.


Related Topics:

Boy Scout of America Encyclopaedia of Sexual Abuse 1947 -2005

California Schools Prepare for Transgender Anti-Discrimination Law Changes*

Head of Children’s Homes Accused of 49 Counts of Paedophilia*

A Child’s Personal Sovereignty… Stolen!*

The American Family Being Forced Into Extinction*

Official: Most US Warplanes Never Attack ISIS/ISIL*

Official: Most US Warplanes Never Attack ISIS/ISIL*

US jets conducting a mission over Iraq in 2015. (AFP Photo)

Iraq’s former national security advisor says most US fighter jets deployed to bomb terrorists in the Arab country return to their bases without engaging terrorist positions, Press TV reports.

Mowaffak al-Rubaie on Sunday sharply criticized the US-led airstrikes against the ISIL as ineffective.

From where I sit in Baghdad, said Rubaie, “eight out of each 10″ aircraft loaded with ammunition return to their bases without striking their targets

“Only two out of ten strike their targets in Iraq,” he told Press TV in an exclusive interview.

Rubaie also demanded the United States to speed up the process of supplying Iraq with weapons Iraqi forces require, saying Washington must immediately deliver the weapons and military hardware that Baghdad has paid for in the past.

There are weapons that the Iraqi government has paid for in the past but has not received yet, Rubaie noted.

According to Rubaie, some of the weapons that Baghdad is waiting for the US to send over can potentially turn the tables around on the ground in the fight against ISIL.

The terrorist organization has been wreaking havoc in the Middle East, including Iraq, after taking over one of the largest cities there, Mosul, last June. It recently seized Ramadi, which is only 100 kilometers away from Baghdad, the country’s capital.

“I think the United States government needs and should and ought to do a lot more,” in Iraq, he said.

The United States and dozens of its allies have been launching airstrikes against the ISIL terrorist group in Iraq since August.

The US has been also carrying out similar air raids against ISIL positions in Syria since September.

This comes as many see the US and its regional allies as the leading supporters of the ISIL and other affiliated terrorist groups in Syria and Iraq.


Related Topics:

Senior Commander of ISIS is a ‘retired’ US General Paul Vallely*

Undercover Iraqi Journalist on ISIS and Why the U.S. Will Fail*

U.S. Airstrikes Killing Civilians not ISIS as Fallujans Walk out on ISIS Sermons*

U.S. Destruction of Syrian Oil Infrastructure has nothing to do with ISIS/L*

Under Israeli Air Cover, and U.S. Stand down, ISIS took Palmyra*

CIA Fabricates ISIL Intelligence*

ISIL Camp near Syria Border Destroyed by Iraqi Army not U.S.*

Iraqi Forces Arrest ISIL’s US, Israeli Military Advisors*

US And UK Planes are Air-Dropping Weapons And Supplies to ISIS*

CIA + Contractors = ISIS in Afghanistan*

ISIS/L and European Neo-Nazis United under Pentagon’s 5th Generation Warfare*

Israel Fuelling Syrian Crisis with Aid to Al-Qaida Rebels*

Are ISIS Backers Attempting to Revive the Ailing Beast?*

Syrian Army and Kurdish Fighters Seize ISIL’s Main Stronghold*

First Amendment Rights – Citizens Can No Longer Collect Soil Evidence*

First Amendment Rights Gone – Citizens Can No Longer Collect Soil Evidence*

Wyoming’s ranchers allow their cattle to graze on public lands, putting the picturesque state’s groundwater at risk for contamination with deadly E. coli bacteria. This spring Republican Governor Matt Head signed a bill into law that criminalizes collecting “resource data,” such as water samples and photographs, with the intent of reporting them to state or federal regulators. Critics say the new law contravenes the Clean Water Act, defies the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause and effectively suppresses First Amendment rights.

Related Topics:

Dwellers of California Desert Lifestyle Under Threat

Ireland Removing the Right to Live in the Countryside*

Land-Grabbing: Targeting the Sioux Indian Reservation*

NSA Phone Surveillance Program Takes a Set-back Courtesy of the Senate*

NSA Phone Surveillance Program Takes a Set-back Courtesy of the Senate*

By Lauren C. Williams

After a post-midnight vote Saturday, the U.S. Senate took no action to extend or revise the National Security Agency’s controversial phone data surveillance program, and the program along with other sections of the Patriot Act is set to expire as planned on June 1.

“Sunsetting the Patriot Act is the biggest win for ending mass surveillance programs, and one that conventional DC wisdom said was impossible. We are seeing history in the making and it was because the public stood up for our rights to freedom of expression and freedom of association — and there’s no turning back now,” Tiffiniy Cheng, co-founder of Fight for the Future, an anti-government surveillance group said in a news release.

A cohort of House members including government surveillance critic Rep. Rand Paul (R-KY) rejected Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) proposed amendments to the bill that would extend the program, the Washington Post reported. The Senate could not muster the 60 votes needed to move forward with the NSA reform bill, the USA Freedom Act, passed by the U.S. House of Representatives last week.

The failed 57-42 procedural vote early Saturday blocked the only bill that could prevent a complete shutdown of the NSA’s metadata program. The bill also would have been a compromise with the White House and civil liberties advocates to limit the government’s data collection abilities under Section 215 of the Patriot Act. McConnell said the Senate would return May 31 to vote again and prevent the program from expiring completely at 12:01 am June 1.

With Congress now in recess until after the Memorial Day holiday, the NSA said it will begin dismantling its program so that no new data queries can be made after June 1. Queries approved under Section 215 and originally set to expire after June 1 would continue through their expiration date, in the event of a complete sunset of the program.

The official sunset of Section 215 is a great victory for privacy advocates who felt emboldened by a recent court decision that deemed the NSA program illegal. At this juncture, Congress could take up new legislation to reinstate the program if the May 31 vote fails, or it can return to a higher set of standards that were in place before the Patriot Act.

As the Brennan Center for Justice’s Elizabeth Goitein put it: “The Patriot Act did not invent surveillance or the collection of business records. We’ll just go back to a system where surveillance is predicated on individuals.”


This post incorrectly stated that the phone surveillance program would expire June 1. It has been updated to report the Senate’s plan to hold another vote May 31.


Related Topics:

Missouri Bans Cellphone Tracking without a Warrant*

NIS: Surveillance from Cradle – Grave, and 50+% of Every Penny Made Deducted*

NSA Phone Surveillance Ruled Illegal, but will that Stop Them*

Controversial Muslim Surveillance Unit Disbanded*

Court Gives Green Light on Surveillance of Muslims*

UK to Legalize Mass Surveillance*

Hackers Target Mobiles – Phone Virus’ on the Rise*

Smartphone + Google Account = Your Every Move Tracked for a Month*

Jail Time and a $20k Fine for Refusing to Give a Phone Password*

Lloyds Nullifies Health Insurance against Mobiles Phones, Wi-Fi and EMF/EMR*

The U.S. Expanding its Domain to Space and Cyberspace*

Syrian Army and Kurdish Fighters Seize ISIL’s Main Stronghold*

Syrian Army and Kurdish Fighters Seize ISIL’s Main Stronghold*

By Gordon Duff

The Syrian army and the Kurdish Popular Defense Committees gained control over ISIL’s most important stronghold in Hasaka province on Saturday.

 This cuts the supply lines from Turkey to ISIS headquarters in Mosul and pushes ISIS into having to resupply in Eastern Syria through Jordan and Israel.

This represents a far greater defeat for ISIS than anything thus far.  With stories being spread about the collapse of the Syrian army, this kind of strategic triumph, totally unreported in the West is an indication that the US doesn’t seem to have the heart to oppose ISIS for some reason.

With the attack last Saturday on Deir ez Zur by US Delta force now a suspected extraction of a CIA asset involved in stealing and selling Syrian oil, the rules seem to be rapidly changing.

TEHRAN (FNA)-The ISIL lost control of the Abdel Aziz Mountain which is located 38 kilometres to the Southwest of Hasaka city today.

Gaining control over Abdel Aziz Mountain by the Syrian army and Kurdish fighters means that the Takfiri terrorist group has fully collapsed in Western Hasaka province and also lost control over its supply line that stretches from Al-Shadadi city in Southern Hasaka and Deir Ezzur to Northern Hasaka and Reqqa.

Mount Adel Aziz is of strategic importance because it is located at the centre of a crossroad vital for ISIL’s supply and troops transfer.

Now the Syrian army and Kurdish fighters have gained an overlook over ISIL’s moves in the region, enabling them to plan more precise operations on a wider scale with the better information they gain through monitoring the terrorist group’s moves in the region.

The army and the Kurdish troops have launched massive campaign against ISIL’s bastions in Hasaka in the last few days.

On Tuesday, the Syrian army and Kurdish fighter seized control over ISIL’s second most important military stronghold in the province.

The Syrian troops took control of the town of Rezaza in Hasaka countryside to the Southwest of Hasaka city.

Rezaza which was ISIL’s second most important bastion in Hasaka is the third town after Alia and al-Sawameh towns along the Aleppo-Hasaka international highway that the Takfiri terrorists have lost to the Syrian army so far.

Last Saturday, the army units blocked the supply route of ISIL Takfiri terrorists in Hasaka countryside.

The army units took control of Seddiq and al-Batrol crossings in Hasaka which was used for dispatch of weapons and aids to ISIL terrorists in the Northeastern province.

Seddiq crossing was used by the ISIL to connect to Tal Tamr and its loss was a big blow to the terrorist group.

By taking control of Al-Batrol crossing, the Syrian army can advance towards the city of Al-Shadadi in Southern Hasaka province and Tishrin oilfield in Eastern Hasaka.

Last Thursday, the ISIL hideouts were targeted in military operations in Hasaka.

The army destroyed a number of the ISIL terrorists’ hideouts in the village of Um Al-Kebar on road to Abdel Aziz Mountain in Hasaka countryside.

The ISIL Takfiri terrorists currently control shrinking swathes of Syria and Iraq. They have threatened all communities, including Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds, Christians, Ezadi Kurds and others, as they continue their atrocities in Iraq.

Senior Iraqi officials have blamed Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and some Persian Gulf Arab states for the growing terrorism in their country.

The ISIL has links with Saudi intelligence and is believed to be indirectly supported by the Israeli regime.


Related Topics:

Under Israeli Air Cover, and U.S. Stand down, ISIS took Palmyra*

Palestinians to Prosecute Israel at ICC on June 25*

Israel Ordered to Pay Iran $1.1 Billion*

ISIS Loots and Bulldozes Ancient Site of Nimrud*

Iran’s Aid Ship Arrives in Gulf of Aden*

Are ISIS Backers Attempting to Revive the Ailing Beast?*

Iraqi Forces Take Down ISIS’s #2 Abu Ala’a al-Afri*

The American Family Being Forced Into Extinction*

The American Family Being Forced Into Extinction*

It’s a global agenda actually… but the U.S is the successful test run – watchout Ireland

By J. Speer-Williams

Since the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, broad propaganda designed to destroy the institute of marriage and the sanctity of the family has been clever, almost imperceptible, but always there.

The hard truth, however, is that women have been complicit in the destruction of our traditional family unit … or at least allowed it.

For ages, females among both the animal and human species accepted the sacred responsibility of keeping their families together. It was usually the males who left their families, only rarely the females.

This familial irresponsibility amongst males of the human race easily led to their bashing, especially the bashing of white males.

In addition to that, television, movies, magazines, and the mainstream media were filled with fictitious spin, biased reports, and some truths about the abused female and the abusive male. Mothers were told that their lives were unfulfilling and more than unjust.

Women were also inundated with false role models who were rich, glamorous movie starlets who had many divorces and were very happy about it.

TV sitcoms had women like Roseanne Barr making their husbands the butt of snide remarks, always followed by a loud five seconds of phony canned laughter.

American women have long been conditioned to compete with men, not to complement them.

The Women’s Liberation Movement was a bomb meant to explode and kill the tradition American family unit. This psy-op was controlled by the CIA and funded by tax-free foundations.

Women’s Lib was meant to get mothers out of their homes and away from their children.

The late Jewish filmmaker Aaron Russo quoted his friend Nick Rockefeller.

Aaron Russo and Nick Rockefeller

We, the Rockefeller Foundation, supported and funded the Women’s Liberation Movement. Why do you think we did it? There were two primary reasons for this: One was that before women’s right to work, we could only tax half of the population.

The other [reason] was so that with women going out to work it would break up families.

Women would have to spend all day at work away from the family. The children would begin to see the state and teachers as their family and this would make it easier to indoctrinate and control them.

What Mr. Nick Rockefeller did not say is that those of his ilk would ensure that mothers would have to leave their families in search of work because their husband’s income would soon be inadequate to support a family.

But the Controllers’ long pervasive campaign for Equal Pay for Women had nothing to do with enhancing womanhood or supporting families. It was the needed launching pad in order to degrade women into becoming poor parodies of men ­ and not always in mere burlesque ways.

Equal pay for women soon became equal everything for women. Today, we have women police officers, fire fighters, weightlifters, wrestlers, and boxers. Women are now even equally required with men to kill people in our criminal wars.

This is an ungodly offense against nature and the design for women to nurture life rather than to kill it.

In some quarters this is all called progress, especially in those gray murky chambers wherein human engineering is discussed, planned, perverted, and tasked.

The Greek word logos means God’s design, or the natural order of life. Logos is despised by the Controllers from the depths of their collective beingness.

William Wordsworth

Everything the One World Order globalists propagandize for humanity (including the Women’s Liberation Movement) is meant to produce as much chaos, entropy, and death for humanity as possible.

Sadly, there are many American women who have taken up Satan’s banner called feminism, most never knowing how they are in conflict with logos.

Rest assured none of this happened by accident; it was all planned, with many women fighting for their so-called rights.

The carefully planned and engineered Sexual Revolution greatly increased the probability of cohabitation between men and women instead of marriage and the fulfillment of a family unit.

Men, always ready for cohabitation, have never been much of a factor in building families ­ that divine calling and responsibility has always fallen to women.

Once women acquiesced to free love, however, the traditional family unit was doomed, and our society along with it, as complete family units are the strong building blocks of a healthy society.

In this sense, women have let down the family of man, as horrible as that may sound. You see, women were our only hope, as men never were.

Women have always been man’s only hope ­ without her strong positive influence man would accomplish little.

And these are the reasons women have been so attacked, unfortunately with few of them understanding the evil process.

If only … if only … women woke up to how they have been victimized, we would all have a chance to regain the kind of life for which the world once so envied us.


Related Topics:

The Never-ending Feminist War on Children*

War on Faith and Family Continues

Why Billionaire Oligarchs Bankroll Feminism*

Family that Homeschooled their Children Harassed from Germany to France, the US and Back Again*

Boys in Search of Manhood

A Tradition of Manhood

Ordinary Women Doing the Impossible 

JUDGE SLAMS Haringey Council over most shocking case ever – but family is destroyed anyhow

British Family Courts: Protecting Children from the Baby Snatchers*

U.N. – NWO’s Ordered Allow Homosexuality and Abortion or Forget Aid*

The Elite’s Cultural Marxist Agenda

Why is the Legalization of Gay Marriage so Important to the Queen?*

Woman Raised by Lesbians Testifies Gay Marriage Top of the List of Bad Marriages*

Traditional Marriage in D.C. has become a March*