Archive | December 24, 2011

Censoring Flu Research in the Flu Season!

Censoring Flu Research in the Flu Season!


At what point common sense prevails one can never be sure, but when it does happen it seems to disappear as soon as it appears!

As the second bird (Oriental magpie robin) to be found dead from the latest mutation H5N1 in Hong Kong, the U.S. are asking scientists to censor their findings, especially any reference to how scientists mutated H5N1 into a virus that is deadly to humans! In the same period (December 2011), hundreds of crows in Jharkhand, India have also died from H5N1 as well as in Jamshedpur district, in Ranchi, Bokaro, Khuti, and Sahebganj.

The by-line is that the U.S. fears that the information will fall into hands of terrorists, which is a bit like the pot calling the kettle black given past U.S. field experiments on the American public!

So far, two groups of scientists from the Netherlands and the U.S. have submited their findings to Nature and Science, which describes how they succcessfully ‘converted’ bird flu virus which does not spread easily amongst humans to an airbourne form that is communicable through coughs and sneezes, the intent of which at this point is difficult to fathom.  Since bird flu was first detected in 2003, only 331 people have died from it globally. It continues to mutate and the point at which it passes the animal-human barrier is when as much information as possible is needed, especially if it proves to be lethal. Maye at that point, if it is ever reached, the information will passed onto the U.S. pharmaceutical industry to formulate untested vaccines for huge profits unless another country does not get to it first.


“Bird Flu Killing Crows in Jharkhand.”

Connor, S. “US Tells Scientists to Censor Flu Research.”

Related Topics:

The Flu Vaccine that Makes You More Ill

Vaccine Link to Autism Come to the Surface

Vaccine Wake-up Call for Parents

Government Owns Up to a Vaccine Induced Illness

Surviving or Making the Most of the Flu Season!

The High Price of Inequality

The High Price of Inequality*

Compiled by Anup Shah

Professors Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, from the Equality Trust, produced an informative lecture video titled Inequality: The enemy between us? based on their recently released book, The Spirit Level; Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better (Penguin, March 2009).

Professors Wilkinson and Pickett prove that once nations are industrialized, more equal societies almost always do better in terms of health, well-being and social cohesion and that large income inequalities within societies destroys the social fabric and quality of life for everyone:

•Outcomes are substantially worse in more unequal societies

•The problems tend to move together, implying that they share an underlying cause

•Whether their findings are tested internationally among the rich countries, or among the 50 states of the USA, there is almost always the same tendency for outcomes to be much worse in more unequal societies.

•Health and social problems are worse in more unequal countries

•Health and social problems are not related to average income in rich countries

•Child well-being is better in more equal rich countries

•Child well-being is unrelated to average incomes in rich countries

•Levels of trust are higher in more equal rich countries

•The prevalence of mental illness is higher in more unequal rich countries

•Drug use is more common in more unequal countries

•Life expectancy is longer in more equal rich countries

•Infant mortality rates are higher in more unequal countries

•More adults are obese in more unequal rich countries

•Educational scores are higher in more equal rich countries

•Teenage birth rates are higher in more unequal rich countries

•Homicide rates are higher in more unequal rich countries

•Children experience more conflict in more unequal societies

•Rates of imprisonment are higher in more unequal societies

•Social mobility is higher in more equal rich countries

•More equal societies are more innovative

•More equal countries rank better on recycling

An interesting point they make is that economic growth alone — which is supposed to raise the income of all — is not necessarily a good determinant of life-expectancy and well-being: individuals in some developing countries can attain a level of life-expectancy comparable to industrialized nations even when their income may be far lower.

The Equality Trust notes:

“…The most important reason why violence is more common in more unequal societies is that it is often triggered by people feeling looked down, disrespected and loss of face.”


Related Topics:

Is it true 1% of Americans Control a Third of the Wealth?

Reflections on Islam, Liberty and Development

Reflections on Islam, Liberty and Development II

Reflections on Islam, Liberty and Development III

Reflection on Islam, Liberty and Development IV