Archive | March 22, 2013

False Flags, Media Deception and Social Control*

The global mediaFalse Flags, Media Deception and Social Control*


In one of those rare moments, often referred to as Freudian slip, a reputable anchor for the upgraded (by whom) Egyptian Nile TV channel (not watched by Egyptians) asked a counter-revolutionary guest about the media’s role in the recent civil strife, that most  Egyptians  only hear about from the counter-revolutionary media. The response was that ‘media only translates what is happening’. The anchor then referred to the concerns of an Egyptian living in Australia, who on seeing the news reports decided to go and look for herself.  The guest then commented on foreign media, at which point the anchor then added that she was watching  an Egyptian TV channel, and that when she arrived she fund that life was carrying n as normal! Of course the guest could not make a reasonable response, but the ounce   of credibility that Egyptian media had left remaining after the January 25 youth revolution, especially after closing its doors literally leading to mass fatalities of protesters under the governance of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces.

The reality of media in the 21st century has come to the awareness of  a whole population whether regardless of what side of the fence one is positioned to, but for many that reality is  just becoming apparent!

By James F. Tracy

On March 9, 1995 Edward Bernays died at the age of 103. His professional endeavors involved seeking to change popular attitudes and behavior by fundamentally altering social reality. Since he laid the modern groundwork for deceiving the public we are for better or worse living out his legacy today.

Several years ago Project Censored directors Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff identified and explained the “truth emergency” that is among the greatest threats to civil society and human existence. This crisis is manifest in flawed (or non-existent) investigations into 9/11 and other potential false flag events, fraudulent elections, and illegal wars vis-à-vis a corporate-controlled news media that fail to adequately inform the public on such matters. While neglecting or obscuring inquiry into such events and phenomena major media disparage independent and often un-credentialed researchers as “conspiracy theorists” or, more revealingly, “truthers.”

The truth emergency continues today, and social engineers like Bernays long understood the significance of undermining the use of reason, for it is only through reason that truth may be determined and evaluated. To be sure, individuals and institutions that have successfully achieved legitimacy in the public mind are recognized as having a monopoly on the capacity to reason and are thus perceived as the foremost bearers of truth and knowledge. Through the endorsement of “experts”—figures perceived as authoritative in their field—the public could easily be persuaded on anything from tobacco use and water fluoridation to military intervention abroad.

Today reason is defined one dimensionally; its relationship to truth largely taken-for-granted. Yet as Leibniz observed, reason marks our humanity, suggesting a portion of the soul capable of a priori recognition of truth. With this in mind the modern individual in the mass has been rendered at least partially soulless through her everyday deferral to the powerfully persuasive notion and representation of expertise. However narrowly focused, under the guise of objectivity the institutionally-affiliated journalist, academic, bureaucrat, and corporate spokesperson have become the portals of reason through which the public is summoned to observe “truth.”

These agents of reason are largely bereft of emotion, moderate in temperament, and speak or write in an unsurprisingly formulaic tone. The narratives they relate and play out present tragedy with the expectation of certain closure. And with a century of commercial media programming the mass mind has come to not only accept but anticipate such regulation and control under the regime of institutionally-sanctioned expertise.

The selection and arrangement of experts by corporate media guarantees a continued monopoly on “truth,” particularly when presented to an un-inquisitive and politically dormant public. Yet this phenomenon extends to ostensibly more trustworthy media outlets such as public broadcasting, where a heightened utilization of credentialed expertise is required to ensure the consensus of those who perceive themselves as more refined than the Average Joe.

This preservation of what passes for reason and truth cannot be sustained without a frequent dialectical struggle with unreason and falsity. Since many individuals have unconsciously placed their genuine reasoning faculties in abeyance and often lack a valid knowledge of politics and history, their unspoken faith in government and the broader political economy to protect and further their interests is groundless. Against this milieu those genuinely capable of utilizing their reasoning capacities in the pursuit of truth are often held up as heretical for their failure to accept what is presented as reality, with the requisite “conspiracy theory” label wielded in Orwellian fashion to denote such abnormal intellectual activity.

Lacking the autonomous use of reason to recognize truth, form often trumps substance. For example, a seemingly obscure news website with unconventional graphics or an emotional news presenter purporting to discuss the day’s affairs is typically perceived as untrustworthy and illegitimate by a public conditioned to accept forms of news and information where objectivity and professionalism often camouflage disinformation.

In 2013 the truth emergency is greater than ever, and in the era of seemingly never-ending pseudo-events and Potemkin villages presented by major media as the reality with which we must contend, the application of independent reason in pursuit of truth has all too frequently been replaced with an unthinking obeisance toward the smokescreen of expertise disguising corporate power and control.


Related Topics:

 The era of programming the mind

Belgian MP Exposes Neo-Colonial Plot*

The Black Block!

The New Middle East vs. the Arab Spring

Corporate PSYOPS, Symbolism and the Illusion of Democracy!

Welcome to the New World Order

Who Needs Who!

Navigating 2013!

PsyOps Soldiers at Local TV Stations