Archive | June 2013

A New Virus for a New Hajj Season

A New Virus for a New Hajj Season

By Hwaa Irfan

Before the month of Hajj September 2012, the coronavirus, commonly associated with colds, SARS broke out in Saudi Arabia, though at the time, it was not known whether it was SARS.  WHO raised an alert, and the pandemic mounted to two deaths. Six million hajjis were allowed to complete with their pilgrimage.

This time, another new coronavirus and more fatal Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV, or MERS formerly known as novel coronavirus) has entered Saudi Arabia well in advance of the Hajj season (Umrah will peak during the blessed month of Ramadhan between July 9 and August 7 2013, while Hajj  will take place from October 13 -18 insha’Allah). This new coronavirus claimed its first victim in March 2013 in Jordan, is what is commonly reported, but WHO states as a precaution:

“Recent travellers returning from the Middle East who develop SARI should be tested for MERS-CoV as advised in the current surveillance recommendations.”

So a possible link between SARS and MERS-CoV/MERS is up for consideration.

According to WHO:

“Globally, from September 2012 to date, WHO has been informed of a total of 77 laboratory-confirmed cases of infection with MERS-CoV, including 40 deaths,” – June 26, 2013.

To date, of the 77 laboratory-confirmed infections, 62 have been in Saudi Arabia, and 34 of those died, i.e. a 55% mortality rate, so it is not as deadly as portrayed by the media. Cases have been reported in Europe: France, Germany, the UK, and Italy. All the European cases have been linked to the Middle East. The Director General of WHO, Dr Chan sounded quite alarmed, but recent history errs on the side of precaution when it comes to WH alerts which sometimes wavers in favor of the pharmaceutical industries like the H1N1 virus before they cultured it into the flu vaccines:

“We understand too little about this virus when viewed against the magnitude of its potential threat. We do not know where the virus hides in nature. We do not know how people are getting infected. Until we answer these question, we are empty-handed when it comes to prevention. These are alarm bells. And we must respond… The novel coronavirus is not a problem that any single affected country can keep to itself or manage all by itself. It is a threat to the entire world.”

The virus was isolated in mid-2012 by a scientist in Saudi Arabia and initially carried the name human coronavirus EMC. On May 15, more than eight months after the virus was isolated, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses announced the name Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, states Slate.

MERS-CoV spreads through close contact, as ideal virus for 6 million people in close contact, but SARS-CoV is more human-transmissible than MERS-CoV.  The risk of human transmission increases under hospitalization. The incubation period so far has been 9 – 12 days. It is asymptomatic, so there are no warning signs that can raise concern. The infection can be acute to chronic, and affect a 5-year old as easily as a 50 year old.

Of the four cases reported in the U.K, there were two fatalities with no further outbreak has been reported since February 2013 at a time when the UK was experiencing a prolonged and extremely cold winter and an upshot and a flu epidemic! Gov.uk states:

“Although some person-to-person transmission has been reported, there remains no evidence of sustained person-to-person transmission”.

In France, the doctors do not know how the 65 year old man contracted the virus.

Dr. Ali Mohamed Zaki, who analyzed the first sample of mucus taken from the first victim of the new SARS virus and his discovery of the genetic code of the virus has revealed that this genetically engineered virus may have its origins in laboratories working with manipulating a version of a bat flu, which is dismissed by WHO. MERS-CoV is similar to the SARS virus that first emerged in Asia in 2003, and is also similar to the coronavirus found in bats. Bats carry many coronaviruses.

The World Health Organisation has urged countries with possible cases of novel coronavirus to share information. The move comes after Saudi Arabia said the development of diagnostic tests had been delayed by patent rights on the NCoV virus by commercial laboratories – already pharmaceutical companies are moving in to make a quick profit on what would be untested vaccines as in the H1N1 scenario.

An investigation conducted by Edward Hammond, consultant researcher of Third World Network, has revealed that The Erasmus Medical Centre, a leading medical centre in The Netherlands is claiming proprietary rights via a material transfer agreement (MTA) over the MERS virus. This would block ongoing research placing our health again in the hands of Big Pharma. Naturally, this has led to criticism from Saudi Arabia’s Deputy Minister of Health.

So do we have a pandemic on our hands, that is yet to be seen for many pilgrims life goes on, and the prospect of Jennah/paradise is much more inviting than life on earth given the seemingly endless multiple global crises’ taking place now. But for the control freaks/global governors, Hajj could be the ideal solution to spreading a global pandemic that could reduce the global population or collect more DNA, or to invent a new disabling vaccine for a target consumer out of their reach, or facilitate another rung towards a globalized policed state, and if all else fails increase the falling profits of the trade wings of the global economic elite, while most hajjis will know that life is more than that!

4th October 2013

Six new cases have arisen as Hajj 2013 sets in. The reaction may be a bit alarmist, as fears and wishful thinking grows, Saudi Arabia accounts for the majority of cases and deaths.

Glenn Thomas, spokesman for the UN health agency, said it had been informed by Saudi authorities that the virus had been detected in three men and three women in Riyadh, according to AFP.

But Saudi authorities have said they are optimistic that Hajj will pass off without outbreaks, given that faithful Muslims undertake lower-level pilgrimages at other times and there has been no mass spread of MERS. Saudi Arabia has, however, urged the elderly and chronically ill to avoid the event.

Experts are still struggling to understand MERS, for which there is still no vaccine.

It is considered a deadlier but less-transmissible cousin of the SARS virus that erupted in Asia in 2003 and infected 8,273 people, nine percent of whom died, and sowed economic chaos.

Sources:

Geo, S. “MERS-CoV Biological Weapon More Likely Based On New Evidence and Analysis” http://truthfrequencyradio.com/mers-cov-biological-weapon-more-likely-based-on-new-evidence-and-analysis/

“MERS challenge gets bigger with new cases” http://www.arabnews.com/news/466784

“Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): update” https://www.gov.uk/government/news/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-mers-cov-update

Palmer,  B “Who Gets to Name New Diseases?” http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/explainer/2013/06/mers_cov_outbreak_who_gets_to_name_new_diseases.html

“TWN Info Service on Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge” http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/biotk/2013/biotk130502.htm

WHO “Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) – update”  http://www.who.int/csr/don/2013_06_26/en/index.html

Related Topics:

Is the Threat of Germ Warfare on the Middle East Another Health Scam!

Your Personal Euro Account Could Be Next!

moneyblackholeYour Personal Euro Account Could Be Next!

 

When the personal accounts of Cypriots were emptied to save the banks, the genera response was immediate shock, then return to business as usual. As sovereign(less) Canada began to implement legislation to the same effect, everyone everywhere else thought that they would not be affected.

Michael Snyder informs us that Thursday June 27 2013, a European Union finance ministers approved a plan to force bondholders and shareholders to take the hit for bank rescues ahead of taxpayers because what people with commonsense already know, if you are bankrupt, you are bankrupt, but put in their language, bank bailouts with taxpayers money causes too many problems!

The order of the day according to CNN will be:

First, bondholders, and shareholders

Second, large depositors with 100,000+ euros

Third, Taxpayer funds would be used only as a last resort.

This plan will now be submitted to the European Parliament for final approval.

Why now, read The Emperor has No Clothes! 2013 is the time limit that the cabals experiment could not get past in their Montauk experiments, and is as the year that the shit hits the fan as indicated by the global economic response to the Snowden leaks at a time when Mercury gone retrograde will impact on a transactions, and communications as Pluto discloses our miscreations, and as we transit from one Age to the another!

And he shows us His signs!

We cannot buy time when something is fundamentally wrong. The EU spent a third f its economic output using taxpayers money on ban bailouts from the inception of the crisis in 2008 – 2011. It bankrupted Ireland, Greece, Spain and Cyprus.  The backdrop is that the EU’s economic output is dwindling.

-Car sales in Europe have hit a 20 year low.

-Unemployment is at 12.2 percent.

-An average of 134 retail outlets are shutting down in Italy every single day, with  224,000 retail establishments closed down since 2008.

-Consumer confidence in France has dropped to an all-time low,  unemployment rate at 10.4 percent, and the government is now responsible for 57% of all economic output in France.

– Disposable income in the UK has fallen at the fastest rate in 25 years.

-The national debt in Spain has grown by 19.1% 2012-13.

The Ultimatum of May is to learn to live within ones means socio-economically, spiritually, and psychologically, which offers us an opportunity to redeem, take control of and be more responsible for our own lives with skis that we have forgotten!

The worst of it is if we react to the challenge negatively as on the streets of certain countries currently. The best of it is how we choose to respond which is not apparent, but alive and kicking in some homes and neighbourhoods; and in some countries like Iceland, and Bolivia.

When we learn to respect each other, and value each other, including our natural resources, healthy honest trading is more begin.

There of course is another side, the one that speaks of this all being planned so countries will be oblidged to relinquish sovereignty in favor of a One Government world – but that is a very difficult heist to pull of when the human conscious, and the human spirit is awakened, hence mind control technologies, and debt slavery!

Source*

Obama’s Reputation Goes Viral!*

Obama’s Reputation Goes Viral!*

 

What the cabal’s corporate media doesn’t  portray about President Obama’s South African trip!

Anti-U.S. protesters have burned posters of U.S. President Barack Obama in the South African city of Johannesburg ahead of his visit to the city on Saturday.

Protesters also burned miniature U.S. flags outside the University of Johannesburg Soweto campus, expressing their anger at the U.S. government’s foreign policy.

Demonstrators expressed their opposition to Washington’s support for the Israeli regime, the killing of innocent civilians in U.S. drone strikes, and the continuing operation of the U.S.-run Guantanamo Bay prison.

Some protesters compared the Obama administration’s support for the Israeli regime to the apartheid in South Africa.

Moreover, activists from the Free Palestine Organization of South Africa waved Palestinian flags and carried signs that urged Obama to “Stop Funding Israeli Apartheid.”

Obama and his family arrived in South Africa on Friday for the second leg of their tour of three African countries which has been estimated to cost American taxpayers up to $100 million.

On Friday, hundreds of protesters also marched to the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria carrying signs that read “NO, You Can’t Obama”, a reference to Obama’s “Yes We Can” campaign slogan during his first run for election.

Obama, the first African-American president of the U.S., had planned to visit anti-apartheid legend Nelson Mandela, whom he has called his “personal hero,” however, South African protesters warned that Obama should not try to link himself to Mandela

Prior to Obama’s visit to South Africa, the Muslim Lawyers Association in Johannesburg said Obama should be arrested upon arriving in the country and be tried for war crimes.

The Nobama Coalition of 25 organizations gathers outside University of Capetown

In front of the University of Johannesburg, where the U.S. president is slated to receive an honorary degree today, were greeted with rubber bullets 29/30 June 2013

Source*

Related Topics:

Why are World Business leaders Meeting in South Africa!

Not Just About the Slave Wage of Mineworkers!

South Africa: What is Really Protected by the State Protection Bill!

As France Passes, South Africa is Still Struggling with GM Crops!

South Africa: Protecting Indigenous Plant Knowledge

African Civil Society Rejects Foreign Investment*

BRICS ~ Brazil, Russia, India, China, & South Africa: Block Rothschild’s US and EU Computer Generated Ponzi Bailout Scheme Money Issuances.

African Food Security and the Trade Arm of Global Governance*

Navigating 2013!

U.S. Drones Out of Africa and Everywhere!

Malcolm X’s Grandson Baited and Killed

A Carnival Against Capitalism as G8 Tries to Bring Global Food Supply to Heel!

Bush (43) Administration Convicted of War Crimes

The Emperor has No Clothes!

The Emperor has No Clothes!*

From Alexandra

Easy  Money

 

International confidence in the US economy has begun to crumble after the Snowden leaks‏.

 

Along with the exposure of widespread international surveillance, Edward Snowden has revealed how exactly the US is financing its military ambitions.

It’s game over!”

Below is a transcript of Max Keiser being interviewed by RT.

RT: Surely not even you can make any kind of link between the Snowden saga and the US economy?

Max Keiser: The American economy runs on the confidence, confidence that the world accepts the US dollar as world reserve currency, confidence that the US bond market will remain the standard. And what we are seeing is a sell-off in a bond market and a sell-off in the stock market, because confidence in the US and its ability to maintain a global empire through interest rates and the Central Bank policy is crumbling before the world’s very eyes.

What’s interesting is that Edward Snowden worked for Booz Allen. Booz Allen allegedly along with a few other companies are the masterminds behind LIBOR market rigging, energy market rigging, FOREX market rigging. And this is really the fuel that keeps the American military empire going, because the American economy itself cannot support its military ambitions so they’ve resorted to market manipulation and the kind of intelligence that Edward Snowden is able to aggregate is key to manipulating markets in ways that make Booz Allen, allegedly, the channel for billions and billions of dollars into America’s military campaigns.

And this is really about money, markets and manipulations. It’s not about security. It’s not to do with anything that the White House says. Remember, the White House is a puppet of Wall Street, Booz Allen, the hedge funds and the financial interests of the corrupt bankers.

RT: Can you also give us an idea of how some of those big companies like Google, or Facebook could actually benefit from this surveillance program PRISM? Is there financial a financial gain from them?

MK: Absolutely, because all of the manipulation involves rigging the indexes. And the indexes are all data-sensitive. So, if you can manipulate the data, you can manipulate the indexes and you manipulate the markets. And if you have advanced knowledge of that inside information you can make billions of dollars of front-running, high-frequency trading, algorithmic trading. And, of course, all the banks on the Wall Street are in on this and all the banks in the UK.

It’s very telling that the foreign minister of Ecuador said that, look “you are talking about us extraditing Edward Snowden, what about bringing back those bankers we asked you to bring back to Ecuador who we caught rigging and terrorizing our market?”

What about the Icelandic bankers that have been asked by the government of Iceland to be extradited back to Iceland that are being held in the UK?

What about these other instances where banking terrorists are being sheltered in the US and the UK?

They’re not responding to extradition agreements. So this is all about financial legerdemain, unfortunately, Americans don’t have enough money to fight their wars anymore so they have to resort to snooping, data-gathering, and market manipulation.

RT: What about the diplomatic fallout? We’ve seen tensions between China and Washington but that of course leads to economic tension. Could that impact trade between the two?

MK: I hope Russia, China, and Ecuador stand up to the financial terrorists in America and Britain. Stay the course. Don’t give in and don’t appease the financial terrorists on Wall Street.

RT: But how could a small country like Ecuador stand up to a giant like America, where there is indeed trade between the two?

MK: What Edward Snowden has proved is that if you live a principled life and stay true to your convictions then you can change the world.

RT: Are we going to see financial fallout between China and the US?

MK: Well China has got a fantastic card to play, one trillion US dollars that they can dump on the market anytime and jack interest rates up five or six points, which would throw the real estate market back into collapse. China is pulling the strings here and China has all the cards to play. America is the biggest debtor nation in the world. Look at the bond market today, it’s selling off spectacularly all over the world because confidence in the American hologram of finance is collapsing. They flipped the switch. They see that the emperor has no clothes. They see that there’s no underlying economic activity to support the military and financial occupations emanating from the US. It’s game over!

Related Topics:

Snowden: Sacrificing his Life for Our Freedom*

Your Money, Their Interest – Banking Scandals Continue…

Heavenly Signs: The Ultimatum of May!

Cabal’s Central Banks in for a Rough Ride or Complete Collapse!

$9,000,000,000,000 Missing From the Federal Reserve

Google, CIA and NSA!*

A Carnival Against Capitalism as G8 Tries to Bring Global Food Supply to Heel!

Bush (43) Administration Convicted of War Crimes

The Revolution Business‏

$45 Million Stolen from Banks Worldwide Shows How Easy It is in a Cashless Society*

750,000 U.S. Households have gone off-the-Grid

Canada Prepares for Bankers to Dip into Personal Accounts!*

The Cabal, Barbarism and Israel

The Gold Behind the New $100 Bill

Is Income Tax Unconstitutional

Usury – The Root of All Evil?*

IMF Chief Summoned over Alleged Corruption*

Royal Bank of Scotland VP arrested on $10mn Fraud*

It Took Just Three Hundred Men and Women!

Colonial France out for Niger’s Uranium*

Bankers Say Occupy Londoners are Right!*

Not Just About the Slave Wage of Mineworkers!

Wells Fargo Sued U.S$190mn, and Bank of America to Follow!

EU Commissioner Quits After Anti-Fraud Investigation

One Economy, One Government, Your World!

The Emperor’s New Clothes

Resolution to Prohibit War against Syria Without Congressional Authorization*

Resolution to Prohibit War against Syria Without Congressional Authorization*

StormJune 27, 2013, Congressman Walter B. Jones (NC-3) introduced a resolution to prohibit the use of war power against Syria without congressional authorization.  H. Con. Res 40 emphasizes that declaring and appropriating funds for war is a power of the legislative – not executive – branch.  Should the president choose to implement military force against Syria without congressional approval, that decision would constitute an impeachable offense under Article 2, Section 4 of the Constitution.

“We cannot continue to spend American money and risk American lives overseas without a vote of approval from Congress,” said Jones.  “For too long, the legislature’s responsibility to authorize military force has been overlooked.  It is time that we uphold the Constitution, which makes it clear in Article 1, Section 8 that Congress alone holds the power to declare war.  A breach of that principle by the president would unquestionably be considered an impeachable offense.”

Resolution: H. CON. RES. 40 presented to the House of Representatives on June 20, 2013 states:

Expressing the sense of Congress that the President is prohibited under the Constitution from initiating war against Syria without express congressional authorization and the appropriation of funds for the express purpose of waging such a war.

Whereas the Constitution’s makers entrusted decisions to initiate offensive warfare not in self-defense exclusively to Congress in article I, section 8, clause 11;

Whereas the Constitution’s makers knew that the Executive Branch would be prone to manufacture danger and to deceive Congress and the United States people to justify

Whereas chronic wars are irreconcilable with liberty, a separation of powers, and the rule of law;

Whereas the entry of the United States Armed Forces into the ongoing war in Syria to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad would make the United States less safe by awakening new enemies;

Whereas the fate of Syria is irrelevant to the security and welfare of the United States and its citizens and is not worth risking the life of a single member of the United States Armed Forces;

Whereas humanitarian wars are a contradiction in terms and characteristically lead to semi-anarchy and chaos, as in Somalia and Libya;

Whereas if victorious, the hydra-headed Syrian insurgency would suppress the Christian population or other minorities as has been similarly witnessed in Iraq with its Shiite-dominated government; and

Whereas United States military aid to the Syrian insurgents risks blowback indistinguishable from the military assistance provided to the splintered Afghan mujahideen in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet Union and culminated in the 9/11 abominations:

Click to access H.%20Con.%20Res.%2040.pdf

This is Who We Are Helping In Syria?!

Source*

Related Topics:

Al-Azhar Institute Refutes Call for Jihad in Syria*

President al-Assad’s Recent interview with Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung*

Container Ship of Weapons for Syrian Rebels Splits in Half and Sinks!

Syrian Truths Surfacing!*

Algerian Youths Paid by Mossad to Fight Syrians*

Regular Fasting Increases a Longer Healthier Life*

IftarRegular Fasting Increases a Longer Healthier Life*

 

By Jo Willey

Research shows dramatically cutting the amount of calories you eat for two days can keep obesity, heart disease and diabetes at bay.

The revolutionary weight-loss plan restricts calorie intake for 48 hours.

Researchers support intermittent fasting and say it is as effective as weight loss surgery, without the cost or risk.

The scientific review suggests fasting diets may help those with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

A review published in the British Journal of Diabetes and Vascular Disease by a team led by James Brown from Aston University in the West Midlands highlights evidence from clinical trials which shows fasting can limit inflammation, improve levels of sugars and fats in your circulation and cut blood pressure. By fasting, the body is more efficient in selecting which fuel to burn, improving metabolism.

The plan is to restrict calories on alternative days or on two specific days each week which are classed as “fasting days”. On these, women usually aim to consume less than 500 calories and men less than 600. This type of intermittent fasting has been shown in trials to be at least as effective as counting calories every day to lose weight.

Prphet Muhammed (SAW) recommended fasting Mondays and Thursdays.

Scientists have known since the 1940s that intermittent fasting can cut the incidence of diabetes after trials on animals.

But recent studies have also confirmed that cutting calorie intake could reverse Type 2 diabetes in some people. It could also help fight conditions such as dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Researchers measured improved pancreatic function and found fewer fatty deposits associated with insulin resistance present in those fasting.

Scientists say it has some cardiovascular benefits that appear similar to exercising, such as improving blood pressure and heart rate and lowering cholesterol.

Mr Brown said: “Whether intermittent fasting can be used as a tool to prevent diabetes in those individuals at high risk or to prevent progression in those recently diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes remains a tantalising notion and we are currently in preparation for clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of this form of lifestyle intervention in various patient groups.”

Victoria Taylor, senior dietitian at the British Heart Foundation, said: “If you’re considering fasting to control your weight, think carefully about how it might affect your normal activities and lifestyle and, especially if you’re taking prescribed medications, discuss plans with your doctor.”

Source*

Related Topics:  

Ramadhan Reflections: Remembering Those Who Don’t Have the Choice to Fast‏

Fasting in Shawwal

Fasting and Pregnancy

Fasting for Change

Diabetes from Unnatural Causes

The Self Control Gland and Fasting

Synthetic Proteins: Cascading Effects of U.S. Unhealthy Food

Feeding Us Pure Poison!

Sweet Poison

War on Faith and Family Continues

The door to a spiritual journey is always open...War on Faith and Family Continues

By Hwaa Irfan

For those who violently defend their religion against another religion, they are not remiss of the spirit of their faith; they are active pawns in the game of global governance to cancel each other out until our higher selves are reduced to lower selves, and thus enslaved to all that is material in this fear-based world. Many spiritual activists have already fallen prey to the concept that God is a creation with the infiltration of the New Ageists/Light Workers, with such notions as “I AM” anchoring and separating the self away from the Greater Unity – pitting self against self, and self against others.

This deliberate attempt has been systemic applied through the UN-US-Europe global education agenda Common Core Standards, which is also designed to ‘dismantle’ family ties, the conduit of values.  Both the erosion of family and faith is the reason behind societies becoming dysfunctional – lost without  rudder, along with the increase in barbaric acts that go unjudged by justice.  The West have played this card since WWI, but they are not alone in this. So to hear of a Shia, being dragged around the streets of Giza, Egypt for 4 hours for being Shia is understandable as the logical expression of the barbaric acts against the people by the counter-revolutionaries – a class war which has brought the ugly nature of its shadow society to the surface.

When the people were inspired by the youth of the first 3 months of the January 25 Revolution, they were the hands, eyes, ears, and spiritual essence of the country. The country without a leader could protect itself; but the class-based counter-revolution has consistently sought to over-turn anything that questioned its prior existence under Hosni Mubarak. The result is a society riddled with fear and behaviours that make many feel ashamed, and have engendered a growing number into mental illness, shocked at what the society they love has become. Blaming all on one man without taking responsibility serves everyone, but not the country, and rather than heal society has left Egypt, deaf, dumb and blind to anything but the Washington Consensus with some office workers looking forward to creating violence on June 30. A few around the world look to Brazilians to take up the change that Egypt has failed in with its massive protests.

This attack on faith and family is widespread, and no less than in the US, where every attempt is being made to faith and family, with the recent reinstatement  of a professor who made students on a piece of paper with the name “Jesus” written on it.

The professor, Deandre Poole was reinstated at Florida Atlantic University.  Poole’s dangerous lesson was about symbols, and how much we invest in things rather than faith, but that lesson teaches the opposite, and that was coming from a man f faith, a Christian. Despite death threats, and hate mail, which in turn demonstrates the mal-interpretation of the Christian faith, Poole has will resume his position online in September.

Life’s/God’s lessons are here to test us, even in the midst of attack. In the midst of shadow society coming to the surface in Egypt with the symbol of Muslim Brotherhood used to dismantle Islam, as a non-centralized religion, more have turned to it in the midst of a maddening crowd as daily discourse between Christians and Muslims increase – not the desired effect of the counter-revolutionary protest to take place on June 30, 2023 in the name of the revolution, which many now balk at.

Although 9/11, 7/7 etc were attacks on all that is Islam, in essence it was an attack  on all that cannot be controlled including family and faith, just as now the cabal’s attack is on all faiths and all families!

Many of us don’t believe that people can be so contrived, so evil, but history is burdened with many examples up unto the present day. Cancer thrives, because we have turned our bodies into unnatural acidic conditions for it to thrive, and like cancer, many of our socio-economic conditions, our sanity, and humanity lies within our own hands not the hands of those who do not see us as human beings!

Sources:

“Professor Who Forced Students To Stomp On Jesus Re-Hired By Florida College”  http://govtslaves.info/professor-who-forced-students-to-stomp-on-jesus-re-hired-by-florida-college/

Related Topics:

Four Years on Protests in the EU Continue*

Algerian Youths Paid by Mossad to Fight Syrians*

You Can’t Keep a Good Woman Down!

Australia: Deceit by Assimilation!

Jews Protest against the State of Israel

What Some Great Minds Thought of Schooling

Angelina Jolie – Who is She!

Indoctrination in Common Core Texts

Classified Sane Today, Insane Tomorrow!

The Revolution Business‏

Heavenly Signs: May 13 a Wake-up Call from the Creator

Are You in Control of Your Mind?

Parents Rebel against Do or Die Exams

Usury – The Root of All Evil?*

Sheeple!?

50 Ways to Starve the Beast*

Planned Genocide in Progress*

Desecration of Churches and Mosques, Act of Outsiders States Bishop*

Let Them Starve!

A Peek at the Mind Control Music Industry*

The New Pope!

An Ancient Take on the Crucifixion

13th Amendment Ratified When the Rest of the Population Becomes Enslaved!

Love Misplaced By Capitalism*

That Dark Night of the Soul

President al-Assad’s Recent interview with Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung*

President al-Assad’s Recent interview with Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung*

Apologies if Bashar al-Assad seems more intelligent and humane than the corporate owned press has everyone believing! If you have been had, you will not be able to tolerate the truth.

Interviewer: Mr President, how do you view the situation in your country? The Syrian Army has lost control over large parts of Syria, in other words those areas are outside the control of central government. What’s your take on the situation?

President Assad: Your question requires us to put things into their proper context: this is not a conventional war with two armies fighting to control or liberate particular areas or parts of land. What we are in fact dealing with is a form of guerrilla warfare.

As for the Syrian Army, there has not been any instance where our Armed Forces have planned to enter a particular location and have not succeeded. Having said this, the Army is not present – and should not be present – in every corner of Syria. What is more significant than controlling areas of land, is striking terrorists. We are confident that we can successfully fight terrorism in Syria, but the bigger issue is the ensuing damage and its cost. The crisis has already had a heavy toll but our biggest challenges will come once the crisis is over.

Foreign element seeks politically and militarily to prolong crisis

Interviewer: In your recent interview with Al-Manar it appeared as though you were preparing the Syrian public for a protracted struggle. Was that your intention?

President Assad: No, this was not specific to Al-Manar. From the early days of the crisis, whenever I was asked, I have stated that this crisis is likely to be prolonged due to foreign interference. Any internal crisis can go in one of two ways: either it is resolved or it escalates into a civil war. Neither has been the case for Syria because of the foreign component, which seeks to extend the duration of the crisis both politically and militarily; I think its fair to say that my predictions were right.

Genuine re-construction is reconstructing mentalities, ideologies and conceptions

Interview: Mr President, how do you expect to overcome the large-scale destruction that has been inflicted in Syria?

President Assad: In the same way you, in Germany, overcame the devastation after World War II, and in the same way many other nations have progressed and been rebuilt after their wars. I am confident Syria will follow the same path. As long as we have resilient people, we can rebuild the country. We have done this before and we can do it again, learning from all we have been through.

In terms of funding, we have been a self-sufficient country for a very long time. Of course we will need to be more productive than before as a result of the situation. Friendly countries have helped us in the past and continue to offer their support, maybe in the form of loans in the future. It may take a long time, but with our determination, our strength and our solidarity, we can rebuild the country.

However, the more arduous challenge lies in rebuilding, socially and psychologically, those who have been affected by the crisis. It will not be easy to eliminate the social effects of the crisis, especially extremist ideologies. Real reconstruction is about developing minds, ideologies and values. Infrastructure is valuable, but not as valuable as human beings; reconstruction is about perpetuating both.

Re-drawing map of region will be map of wars in the Middle East

Interviewer: Mr President, during the crisis some areas of the country have become either more self-reliant or more reliant on external support. Do you think this could potentially lead to the re-drawing of borders?

President Assad: Do you mean within Syria or the region in general?

Interviewer: The region – one hundred years after the Sykes-Picot Agreement.

President Assad: One hundred years after Sykes-Picot, when we talk about re-drawing the borders in our region, we can use an analogy from architecture. Syria is like the keystone in the old architectural arches; by removing or tampering with the keystone, the arch will collapse. If we apply this to the region, to the world, – any tampering with the borders of this region will result in re-drawing the maps of distant regions because this will have a domino effect which nobody can control. One of the superpowers may be able to initiate the process, but nobody – including that superpower, will be able to stop it; particularly since there are new social borders in the Middle East today that didn’t exist during Sykes-Picot. These new sectarian, ethnic and political borders make the situation much more complicated. Nobody can know what the Middle East will look like should there be an attempt to re-draw the map of the region. However, most likely that map will be one of multiple wars, which would transcend the Middle East spanning the Atlantic to the Pacific, which nobody can stop.

Interviewer: Mr President, in your opinion what will the region look like in the future?

President Assad: If we rule out the destructive scenario of division in your last question, I can envisage a completely different and more positive future, but it will depend on how we act as nations and societies. This scenario involves a number of challenges, first of which is restoring security and stability; our second challenge is the rebuilding process. However, our biggest and most important challenge lies in facing extremism.

It has become extremely clear that there has been a shift in the societies of our region away from moderation, especially religious moderation. The question is: can we restore these societies to their natural order? Can our diverse societies still coexist together as one natural whole? On this point allow me to clarify certain terms. The words tolerance and coexistence are often used to define our societies. However, the more precise and appropriate definition, of how our societies used to be – and how they should be, is harmonious. Contrary to perception, the issue is neither about tolerance – since there will come a day when you are not tolerant, nor is the issue about coexistence – since you co-exist with your adversaries, but rather it is about harmony. What used to characterize us in the region was our harmony. You cannot say that your hand will coexist with or tolerate your foot because one compliments the other and both are a part of a harmonious whole.

Another challenge is political reform and the question of which political system would keep our society coherent: be it presidential, semi-presidential or parliamentary, as well as deciding the most appropriate legislation to govern political parties. In Germany, for example, you have the Christian Democratic Party. In Syria we could not have religious parties, neither Christian nor Muslim, because for us religion is for preaching and not for political practice. There are many other details, but the essence is in accepting others. If we cannot accept each other we cannot be democratic, even with the best constitution or the best legislations.

we are a secular state that essentially treats its citizens equally

Interviewer: Mr President, where do you see secularism in the midst of the rising Islamic current in the region?

President Assad: This is a very important question; many in the region do not understand this relationship. The Middle East is a hub of different ideologies. Arab society is primarily based on two pillars: Pan-Arabism and Islam. Other ideologies do exist, such as communism, liberalism, Syrian nationalism, but these are not nearly as popular. Many people understand secularism as synonymous with communism in the past, in that it is against religion. In fact it is the complete opposite; for us in Syria secularism is about the freedom of confession including Christianity, Islam and Judaism, and the multiple diverse sects within these religions. Secularism is crucial to our national unity and sense of belonging. Therefore we have no choice but to strengthen secularism because religion is already strong in our region, and I stress here that this is very healthy. What is not healthy is extremism because it ultimately leads to terrorism; not every extremist is a terrorist, but every terrorist is definitely an extremist.

So in response to your question, we are a secular state that essentially treats its citizens equally, irrespective of religion, sect or ethnicity. All our citizens enjoy equal opportunities regardless of religious belief.

Syria is passing through most difficult circumstances, definitely not a spring

Interviewer: Mr President, how do you view the two-and-a-half years since the so-called ‘Arab Spring?’

This is a misconception. Spring does not include bloodshed, killing, extremism, destroying schools or preventing children from going to their schools, or preventing women from choosing what to wear and what is appropriate for them. Spring is the most beautiful season whilst we are going through the direst circumstances; it is definitely not Spring. Is Spring compatible with what is happening in Syria – the killing, the slaughtering, the beheading, the cannibalism, I leave it to you to decide.

Interviewer: What are the issues that the so-called “Arab Spring” is supposed to resolve?

President Assad: The solution doesn’t lie in the ‘Spring’ or in anything else, the solution lies in us. We are the ones who should provide the solutions, by being proactive instead of reactive. When we address our problems proactively we ensure that we get the right solutions. Solutions imposed reactively by the ‘Spring’ will only lead to deformed results.

Like many countries in the Middle East, we have numerous problems that we are aware of and view objectively. This is how these problems should be solved, in that the solutions are internally manufactured and not externally administered, as the latter would produce a distorted or stillborn solution. It is for this very reason that when we call for dialogue or solutions, they need to be home-grown in order to ensure that they lead to the Syria we aspire to.

what is happening in Iraq now, and in Lebanon previously, are repercussions of the situation in Syria

Interviewer: Mr President, you have rejected any form of foreign intervention and have warned that this would extend the battle to wider areas, have you reached this?

President Assad: Let’s be clear about this, there are two types of foreign intervention: indirect through proxies or agents, and direct intervention through a conventional war. We are experiencing the former. At the beginning of the crisis I warned that intervention in Syria – even indirectly, is similar to tampering with a fault line, it would lead to shockwaves throughout the region. At the time, many people – especially in the media, understood this as President Assad threatening to extend the crisis beyond Syria’s borders. Clearly they did not understand what I meant at the time, but this is exactly what is happening now.

If we look at the reality in front of us, we can see clearly that what is happening in Iraq now, and in Lebanon previously, are repercussions of the situation in Syria, and this will only extend further and further. We are seeing these ramifications and the intervention is still indirect, so imagine the consequences of military intervention? The situation will, of course, be much worse and then we will witness the domino effect of widespread extremism, chaos and fragmentation.

Relations with Russia and Iran are cooperation guaranteed by international law

Interviewer: You criticise countries including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and Britain for their interference in the Syria crisis, isn’t it true that Russia and Iran are also involved?

President Assad: There is a significant difference between the co-cooperation of states as opposed to the destabilisation of a certain country and interference in its internal affairs. Cooperation between countries is conceived on the concept of mutual will, in a way that preserves their sovereignty, independence, stability and self-determination. Our relationship with Russia, Iran and other countries that support Syria are cooperative relations certified under international law.

The countries you mentioned, have adopted policies that meddle in Syria’s internal affairs, which is a flagrant violation of international law and our national sovereignty. The difference therefore, is that cooperation between countries is intended to preserve stability and perpetuate the prosperity of these nations, whilst foreign interference seeks to destabilise countries, spread chaos and perpetuate ignorance.

Interviewer: Sir, you have discussed the repercussions of the Syrian crisis on Iraq and Lebanon whose societies are based on what one might call a sectarian system. Do you think that such a system with Sunni and Shiite pillars could be established in Syria?

President Assad: Undoubtedly, sectarian systems in neighbouring countries, sectarian unrest or civil wars – as in Lebanon 30 years ago, will inevitably affect Syria. That is why Syria intervened in Lebanon in 1976 – to protect itself and to safeguard Lebanon. It is for this reason that we are observing carefully the unfolding events in Iraq – they will affect us directly. This was also for this reason that we adamantly opposed the war on Iraq, despite a mixture of American temptations and threats at the time. We rejected losing our stability in return for appeasing the Americans. Sectarian systems are dangerous and that is why we insist on the secular model where all citizens are equal regardless of religion.

Jabhat al-Nusra is a branch of al-Qaeda, they uphold same ideology

Interviewer: Mr President, you are fighting “Jabhat Al-Nusra.” Can you tell us about it, what is this organization, who supports them, who supplies them with money and weapons?

President Assad: Jabhat Al-Nusra is an Al-Qaeda affiliated group with an identical ideology whose members live in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Jordan as well as other Arab and Muslim countries; they are very well financed and have plenty of arms. It is difficult to trace their sources due to the fact that their support resides in a covert manner through wealthy individuals and organisations that adopt the same ideology.

Their primary aim is to establish an Islamic State in accordance to their interpretation of Islam. Central to their political thought is the Wahhabi doctrine – comparable to Al-Qaeda’s in Afghanistan. This ideology is administered wherever they are present, especially on women. They claim to be applying Sharia Law and the Islamic Religion; however, in reality their actions are a complete distortion of the real religion of Islam. We have seen examples of their brutality on our satellite channels taken from footage they publish on purpose on YouTube in order to spread their ideology; a recent example was the beheading of an innocent man, which was aired on Belgian TV.

Interviewer: What is the motivation for Saudi Arabia and Qatar to assist and arm the terrorists against you, what do they seek to achieve?

President Assad: Firstly, I believe that this is a question they should be answering. I will respond by raising a few questions. Do they support the armed gangs because of their vehement belief in freedom and democracy as they claim in their media outlets? Do they harbour any form of democracy in their own countries, in order to properly support democracy in Syria. Do they have elected parliaments or constitutions voted on by their people? Have their populations decided at any time during the previous decades on what type of governing system they want – be it monarchy, presidency, principality or any other form? So, things are clear: they should first pay attention to their own nations and then answer your question.

Interviewer: In this quagmire, why do Britain and France delegate leadership to Saudi Arabia and Qatar? What do they hope to achieve?

President Assad: I also cannot answer on behalf of Britain or France, but I can give you the general impression here. I believe that France and Britain have an issue with the ‘annoying’ Syrian role in the region – as they see it. These countries, like the United States, are looking for puppets and dummies to do their bidding and serve their interests without question. We have consistently rejected this; we will always be independent and free. It seems as though France and Britain have not forgotten their colonial history and persist in attempting to manipulate the region albeit through proxies. Indeed, Britain and France can direct Saudi Arabia and Qatar on what they should do, but we must also not forget that the policies and economies of France and Britain are also dependent on petrodollars.

What happened in Syria was an opportunity for all these countries to get rid of Syria – this insubordinate state, and replace the president with a “yes man.” This will never happen neither now nor in the future.

Interviewer: The European Union has not renewed the arms embargo imposed on Syria and yet it has not approved arming the opposition. What is your assessment of this step?

President Assad: Clearly there is a split within the European Union on this issue. I cannot state that the EU is supportive of the Syrian government; there are countries, especially Britain and France, who are particularly hostile to Syria. On the other hand, there are countries – Germany in particular, which are raising logical questions about the future consequences of arming the terrorists. Well firstly, that would perpetuate the destruction in Syria, forcing the Syrian people to pay an even heavier price. Secondly, by supplying arms, they are effectively arming terrorists, and the Europeans are well informed that these are terrorists groups. Some are repeating the American rhetoric of “good fighters and bad fighters,” exactly as they did a few years ago with the “good Taliban and bad Taliban, good Al-Qaeda and bad Al-Qaeda.” Today there is a new term of “good terrorists and bad terrorists” being promoted. Is this logical?

When terrorism prevails, it will spread towards Europe

They are aware that weapons sent to the region will end up in the hands of terrorists, which will have two consequences. First, Europe’s back garden will become a hub for terrorism and chaos, which leads to deprivation and poverty; Europe will pay the price and forfeit an important market. Second, terrorism will not stop here – it will spread to your countries. It will export itself through illegal immigration or through the same terrorists who returned to their original countries after being indoctrinated and trained more potently. These pressing issues in my opinion are creating a considerable split or disagreement within the European Union; they may not like it, but they have no other choice than to cooperate with the Syrian government, even if they disagree with it.

Interviewer: Your Excellency has stated that if European countries were to send weapons to Syria, they would effectively be arming terrorists. Do you consider all armed militants as terrorists?

President Assad: As a European or German citizen I will pose the following question: does your country allow you to carry arms, intimidate or kill innocent people, vandalise and loot? Any individual or group excluding the army and police who carries arms, kills people, threatens and intimidates public safety are by definition terrorists, this is a norm in every country. Regardless of their background, be it extremists, criminals or convicted felons, those who are carrying weapons in Syria are essentially committing these acts. Therefore, they are terrorists. We differentiate between terrorists and conventional opposition groups, since the latter is a political entity and has a political agenda. Killing and slaughtering is terrorism and plunges the country back years into regression.

Interviewer: So Mr President, you see the future as being against terrorism?

President Assad: This is the logical conclusion; however in Europe you have many illogical, unrealistic and irresponsible politicians who are applying their negative sentiments instead of their reason. Politics should not be fuelled by love or hatred, but by interests. As a German citizen, you should ask yourself what do you stand to gain from what is happening in our region? Basically, what is happening now is against your national interests, your genuine interest lies in fighting terrorism.

Interviewer: Some view Hezbollah as a terrorist organization; we know that it has fought alongside Syrian troops in al-Quseir. We have also heard that there are fighters from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard fighting with you. Do you really need these forces?

President Assad: The media is trying to portray Hezbollah as the main fighting force on the ground and the Syrian Army as weak and unable to achieve victory. In reality, over the last months we have achieved significant victories on the ground in different parts of Syria; in all of these victories, some of which were more important than al-Quseir, the Syrian army fought alone. None of this is highlighted in the media. One of the reasons for these victories is the National Defence Forces – local citizens fighting alongside the army to defend their communities and regions. Al-Quseir received more international attention because of statements by western officials projecting it as a strategic town, to the extent that even some United Nation’s officials claim to understand the situation in al-Quseir! There was a lot of exaggeration, but there were also a large number of arms and militants. These terrorists started attacking the bordering towns loyal to Hezbollah, which warranted their intervention alongside the Syrian army in order to restore stability.

The Syrian Army is a large army capable of accomplishing its missions across Syria, with the support of the local communities. If we were in need of such assistance, why not use these forces in the rural parts of Damascus, close to the capital? Damascus is certainly more important than al-Quseir, as is Aleppo and all the other major cities; it doesn’t make any sense. But as I said at the beginning, the aim of this frenzy is to reflect an image of Hezbollah as the main fighting force and to provoke Western and International public opinion against Hezbollah.

Interviewer: How strong and large are the Hezbollah brigades currently in Syria?

President Assad: There are no brigades. They have sent fighters who have aided the Syrian army in cleaning areas on the Lebanese borders that were infiltrated by terrorists. They did not deploy forces into Syria. As you are aware, Hezbollah forces are positioned towards Israel and cannot depart Southern Lebanon. Additionally, if Hezbollah wanted to send fighters into Syria, how many could they send? A few hundred? The Syrian Army has deployed hundreds of thousands of troops across the country. Several hundred would make a difference in one area, but it would not conceivably constitute enough to tip the balance across all of Syria.

Interviewer: Mr President, Britain and France claim to have clear evidence that chemical weapons have been used. The White House has stated that it possess information to ascertain this claim, which consequently led to the death of 100 to 150 people in one year, in addition to that you have denied the UN investigators access to areas in Syria except for Aleppo. How do you explain the situation?

President Assad: Let’s begin with the statement from the White House regarding the 150 casualties. Militarily speaking, it is a well-understood notion that during wars, conventional weapons can cause these number of deaths, or even higher, in a single day, not in a year. Weapons of mass destruction generally kill thousands of people at one given time; this high death toll is a primary reason for its use. It is counterintuitive to use chemical weapons to create a death toll that you could potentially reach by using conventional weapons.

America, France, Britain and some European officials claimed that we have used chemical weapons in a number of areas. Regardless of whether such weapons exist or not, we have never confirmed or denied the possession of these weapons.

Had they obtained a single strand of evidence that we had used chemical weapons, do you not think they would have made a song and dance about it to the whole world?, then where is the chain of custody that led them to a such result?

These allegations are ludicrous. The terrorist groups used chemical weapons in Aleppo; subsequently we sent an official letter to the United Nations requesting a formal investigation into the incident. Britain and France blocked this investigation because it would have proven the chemical attacks were carried out by terrorist groups and hence provided conclusive evidence that they (Britain and France) were lying. We invited them to investigate the incident, but instead they wanted the inspectors to have unconditional access to locations across Syria, parallel to what inspectors did in Iraq and delved into other unrelated issues. We are a sovereign state; we have an army and all matters considered classified will never be accessible neither to the UN, nor Britain, nor France. They will only be allowed access to investigate the incident that occurred in Aleppo.

Therefore, all the claims relating to the use of chemical weapons is an extension of the continuous American and Western fabrication of the actual situation in Syria. Its sole aim is to justify their policies to their public opinion and use the claim as a pretext for more military intervention and bloodshed in Syria.

Interviewer: The protests started in Syria peacefully before they turned into an armed struggle. Your critics claim that you could have dealt with the protests through political reforms, which makes you partly responsible for the destruction in Syria. What is your take on this?

President Assad: We started the reforms from the first days of the crisis and, perhaps even to your surprise, they were initiated years before the crisis. We issued a number of new legislations, lifted the emergency law and even changed the constitution through a referendum. This is a well-known fact to the West; yet what the West refuses to see is that from the first weeks of the protests we had policemen killed, so how could such protests have been peaceful? How could those who claim that the protests were peaceful explain the death of these policemen in the first week? Could the chants of protesters actually kill a policeman?

From the beginning of the crisis, we have always reiterated that there were armed militants infiltrating protesters and shooting at the police. On other occasions, these armed militants were in areas close to the protests and shot at both protesters and police forces to lead each side into-believing that they were shot at by the other. This was proven through investigations and confessions, which were publicised on a large scale in the media.

Interviewer: Mr President, it is reported that the Syrian Army has bombarded certain areas. Was there no other option?

President Assad: We are pursuing terrorists who repeatedly infiltrate populated areas. If we take Al-Qseir as an example, there was a western media frenzy claiming that there were 50,000 civilians, which is more than the town’s original population. In fact, when the terrorists entered the area, the inhabitants consequently fled; when we entered we did not find civilians. Usually wherever the terrorists infiltrate, civilians flee and battles occur afterwards. The evidence clearly shows that most of the casualties in Syria are from the armed forces. Civilians mostly die in suicide bombings. They also die when terrorists enter an area, proceed to carry out executions and use them as human shields. The rest of the causalities are either foreign or Syrian terrorists.

Interviewer: After the momentum you have achieved in Al-Qseir, do you feel it is now time to extend a hand to the opposition and consider reconciliation?

President Assad: From day one we have extended a hand to all those who believe in dialogue; this position has not changed. At the start of the crisis, we held a national dialogue conference whilst simultaneously fighting terrorists. But when we talk about the opposition, we should not put them all into one basket; it is imperative to differentiate between terrorists and politicians. In Germany, you have an opposition but they are not armed. Opposition is a political act, and so when we refer to the opposition, we mean the politicians to whom we are always committed to dialogue, regardless of what happened in Al-Qseir.

As to national reconciliation, I do not think that it can be accurately applied to Syria. It implies a scenario of civil war, as was the case in Lebanon, or the conflict between black and white in South Africa. In our case it is about a national dialogue to determine a way out of the crisis and for the terrorists to put down their weapons. In any case, we are awaiting the Geneva conference, which essentially aims at the same political solution. However there are external impediments; Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, France and Britain, continue to exert all their efforts at sabotaging dialogue in order to prolong the Syrian crisis and prevent a political resolution.

Interviewer: How would you define the legitimate political opposition?

President Assad: Essentially, any opposition party that does not support terrorism, does not carry weapons, and has a clear political agenda. But opposition groups are also linked to elections; their clout will depend on how well they fare in local administration elections and more importantly, in parliamentary elections. We are dealing with many groups who call themselves opposition, their success will be determined by two important questions: what is their popular base? And what is their political manifesto? We will then act accordingly.

Interviewer: Segments of the opposition claim that you have not taken steps to form a united front with them against foreign intervention. Is this true Mr President?

President Assad: On the contrary, in the national dialogue conference in 2011, there was an open invitation to all those who considered themselves in the opposition to come forward. Some chose to participate whilst others chose to boycott and blame us for not taking steps towards a solution. But we must ask ourselves, what do they mean by making advances towards them? What should we be offering? Ministerial positions in the government? The opposition in the current government has won hard-fought seats in parliament. When an opposition, made up of hundreds, does not have any seats in parliament how does one ascertain who deserves to be part of the government? We need clear criteria; it should not be haphazard.

To put it another way, the government is not owned by the President for him to bestow gifts upon others in the form of ministries. It requires national dialogue and a political process through which the electorate can choose among other things their government and the constitution.

Interviewer: What are your set criteria for dialogue between you and the opposition, could this include foreign-based opposition?

President Assad: We have no issues with autonomous opposition groups who serve a national agenda. With regards to the foreign-based opposition, we need to be very clear; its members live abroad and report to western foreign ministries and intelligence agencies. They are based outside their country and are in essence manipulated by the states that provide their flow of finance. They are best described as a “proxy opposition.” As far was we are concerned, genuine Syrian opposition means representing the Syrian people – not foreign countries, it means being based in Syria and sharing the burdens and concerns of the Syrian people. Such an opposition would inevitably be part of any political process.

Interviewer: Fighting terrorism has become the priority now. In reference to your recent interview most probably on Al-Manar television, you stated that if you were to engage in a dialogue, you would rather do so with the master than the slave. To what extent are you prepared for dialogue with these entities in the future once you have effectively fought terrorism?

President Assad: It is for this precise reason that we will attend the Geneva conference. I used the notion of the master and the slave to explain what we know will happen in reality. Negotiating with those who have no autonomy over their own decisions essentially means that you are in fact negotiating with the decision makers who dictate to them how to act, what to accept and what to reject. You will have seen on television recently footage of the French Ambassador to Syria giving the external opposition orders and insulting them, or the American Ambassador to Syria shouting and insulting them. Therefore in reality, we are negotiating with the United States, Britain, France and their regional instruments, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Those groups who call themselves external opposition are mere employees; hence the masters and the slaves.

We hope Geneva conference will push forward the dialogue process in Syria

Interviewer: What are your expectations from the conference? Will it be followed by progress or a continued stalemate?

President Assad: We hope that the Geneva conference will push forward the dialogue process in Syria especially since, earlier this year we presented a vision for a political solution based on the Geneva I communiqué. However, even though we will attend the conference with this understanding, we should be clear on the facts. First, the same countries I mentioned earlier that are supporting the terrorists in Syria have a vested interest in the talks failing. The logical question is: what is the relationship between the Geneva conference and terrorism on the ground? Simply, if the Geneva conference is successful – as is our hope, in preventing the smuggling of weapons and terrorists – there are over 29 different nationalities documented to be in Syria, then this would be a catalyst for resolving the Syrian crisis.

However if the smuggling of weapons and terrorists continues, there is no value for any political solution. We hope that the Geneva conference will make this its starting point; it is the single most important element in the Geneva talks, which would ultimately determine its success or failure.

Interviewer: If Geneva II fails, what are the consequences?

President Assad: The countries I mentioned previously would continue to support the terrorists. Failing to solve the Syrian crisis will make it spread to other countries and things will only get worse. Logically speaking therefore, all parties have a vested interest in its success. As to the external opposition, if Geneva succeeds they will lose their funding; if you don’t have money and you don’t have popular support, you end up with nothing.

Interviewer: Could Geneva II propose a government from different political entities?

President Assad: This is what we have suggested in our political initiative. We proposed the formation of an extended government from diverse political entities that would prepare for parliamentary elections; the winners of these elections would have a role in the future. This is an approach that we have been open to from the beginning.

Interviewer: Mr President, some of your critics claim that much blood has been shed in Syria; they blame the leadership and see it as an obstacle standing in the way of Syria’s future. Would you consider stepping down in order to bring about a new Syria?

President Assad: The president has a mandate in accordance with the constitution; my current term ends in 2014. When the country is in a crisis, the president is expected to shoulder the burden of responsibility and resolve the situation, not abandon his duties and leave. I often use the analogy of a captain navigating a ship hit by a storm; just imagine the captain jumping ship and escaping in the lifeboat! If I decide to leave now, I would be committing treason. If on the other hand, the public decided I should step down, that would be another issue. And this can only be determined through elections or a referendum. As an example, in the previous referendum on the constitution, there was a 58% turnout – which is pretty good in the circumstances, and the constitution was approved by 89.4%.

The issue was never about the president, however they tried to project it as such in order to force the president to sell out to those countries backing the opposition, in order to install a puppet president.

Interviewer: Mr President, you live with your family in Damascus. How much public support do you and your family enjoy?

President Assad: When numerous neighbouring and regional countries as well as the West are all opposing you, you couldn’t possibly continue without popular public support. The Syrian people are highly aware of what is happening and have understood the dynamics of the crisis early on; hence their support for their government and their army.

Interviewer: Next year there will be presidential elections, how do you see these elections playing out?

President Assad: They will follow the new constitution, in other words multi-candidate elections. It will be a new experience, which we cannot predict at this point.

Interviewer: Mr President, what is your vision for Syria in the next five years?

President Assad: I reiterate that our biggest challenge is extremism. If we can fight it, with better education, new ideas and culture, then we can move towards a healthy democratic state. Democracy, as we see it in Syria, is not an objective in itself, but rather a means to an end – to stability and to prosperity. Legislations and constitutions are also only tools, necessary tools to develop and advance societies. However, for democracy to thrive, it needs to become a way of life – a part of our culture, and this cannot happen when so many social taboos are imposed by extremist ideologies.

In addition to this, there is of course the reconstruction process, reinvigorating our national industries and restoring and opening up our economy. We will continue to be open in Syria, continue to learn and benefit from the lessons of this crisis. One of these lessons is that ignorance is the worst enemy of societies and forms the basis for extremism; we hope that Europe has also learned from these lessons.

Interviewer: Mr President, thank you very much. I have been greatly influenced by your personality and your vision; I hope Europe and the West will benefit from this interview and look at you and your country differently.

President Assad: Thank you very much and welcome again to Syria.

Source*

Related Topics:

Container Ship of Weapons for Syrian Rebels Splits in Half and Sinks!

Our boys in Syria: ‘I saw rebels execute my boy for no more than a joke’

What’s behind the US Escalation in Syria?*

Al-Azhar Institute Refutes Call for Jihad in Syria*

Turkey: War on Syria has Already Begun!

What’s Happening in Turkey?*

The Revolution Business‏

Quaking in their Boots!?

Are You in Control of Your Mind?

The Occult and 10 Year Planning to Bring Down Syria!

Rothschild’s Israel Declares War on Syria*

Syrian Observatory for Human Rights a One-man EU Funded Show!*

The Treasure at the Heart of Iraq

What Al-Qaeda!

Desecration of Churches and Mosques, Act of Outsiders States Bishop*

Syrian Terrorists Torture Soldiers, Israel Tortures Women, and the Influential Torture Children

France Leads Neocolonial Carve-up of Syria*

Rujm el-Hirri: The Stonehenge of Syria

Syria and the New American Century

The Shock and Awe of the Syrian Rebels*

BBC and Syria Massacre Hoax!*

The Immoral War on Syria

Syrian Truths Surfacing!*

Syria: U.S and NATO Responsible for Death Toll… again!

A Nun Asks Foreign Powers to Leave Syria Alone!

Lebanese Army Intercepts Weapons Bound for Syria*