Archive | November 2013

Evil Intentions Still at Play for Iran!?*

Evil Intentions Still at Play for Iran!?*

By Jim Jones

StormObama and the out of control Administration are preparing to implement their most unspeakable act of treason yet, an attack upon the American people which will shock not only America but horrify the free thinking world and it is being prepared as I write. When this will be delivered is the $64 question – can enough people come to their senses in time; cause sufficient public outcry, to stop this??

First, let’s back-track a bit – is there anyone who questions the American penchant for false flag operations in order to sway public opinion?? Do you really need a history lesson, going back to George Washington, the USS Maine incident, The Lusitania sinking, Pearl Harbour, failed Bay of Pigs, Gulf Of Tonkin, USS Liberty, Oklahoma Bombing, WTC #1, Twin Towers, Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon et.al. People, successive administrations have been using this ploy and refining it for centuries AND you keep falling for it! Why would they change their modus operandi when it has proven to be so successful?  Why change, when they have been able to refine the delivery of the propaganda to a point whereby they easily control the minds of the masses by simply broadcasting their syrup to Mum and Dad average Joe American while the feed on their Big Macs in front of the TV at prime time viewing? Of course Joe American will believe CNN, FOX and the other CIA controlled media outlets. After all, they have done before. The delivery of this false message has been steadily refined with such incidents as have been played out at the likes of Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon – hell, the same actors have been “outed’ at both sites and still people won’t accept that these were all staged events to test the control of the masses.

The current situation falls back to a strategic swing in world power.  With hindsight it is easy to pin-point, although some of us suggested at the time that it was a pivotal point in history. I refer here to the failed McCain/Zionist sponsored Georgian war. This attempt to further weaken Russia and provide an oil pipeline which would have economically crippled Russia, through Georgia, ended in disaster for not only the Zionist, but also America.  America was shown to be a toothless bear in the region – unable to support the criminal regime that it was sponsoring, while Russia clearly demonstrated that it was a power in the region and a supporter of it’s friends and allies.

The flow-on effect of that incident has shaped much of what is happening in the Middle East today and the coming events in America. We see now a major shift in strategic alliances in the region, all based on the various parties perception of who will be the major player in the region – HATO or Russia. Even Georgia, that once stout US ally, is now looking to join the Russia Union! Indications are that Ukraine will follow suit although the Ukraine admission to the EU is an obstacle there. Further afield, other states are looking to their backyard and re-evaluating their alliances. With the minor hic-up of Libya [where Medvedev was lied too by the US and HATO], Russia has steadily spread it’s influence in the Middle East. Strong support for Syria and Russia’s return to Iraq has not gone un-noticed by the Zionist.

The Zionist, fixated on destroying Iran, have been thwarted in their attempts to drag Iran into the illegal war in Syria. Despite, several unprovoked blatant military strikes on Syria and Iran – which were outright acts of war and violated international law – and the false flag gas attacks blamed on the Syrians, Israel has not been able to draw Iran into a wider confrontation, nor has it been able to provoke a retaliatory strike from Syria which could be used as a pretext for America to enter the war, once again in support Zionist causes.

The Zionist feel threatened – they see their meal ticket, America, being reduced in capability in the region while their supposed enemies have grown and strengthened.  The Syrian conflict has once again further weakened the American position in the region and not only has Russia shown military might, they have set themselves firmly at the head of the world diplomatic and statesman’s stage. Rather than seeing Syria roll over quickly, the Zionist have witnessed their worst fears, Syria has grown stronger, has solicited more world support and obtained new allies and friends and is also winning the war. The time that this war has taken has seen Iran become stronger and rearm and develop newer weapons. To top it all off – the Zionist have had to witness the building up in strength of Hezbollah, an army which defeated them in 2006, with much fewer resources and a numerical disadvantage of 10 to 1 to the Zionists. Iraq is re-arming and the Zionist are unsure as to Iraq’s future plans – hence the increase in the terror campaign there, instigated by the Zionists.

From Infowar.comWith increasing desperation, the Zionist are doing all that they can to widen the conflict in Syria and to draw America into the conflict. I read an unconfirmed report that Russia had shot down two “American” ballistic missiles, fired from the area of the Mediterranean close to the South of Spain and aimed at Damascus. Supposedly, Russia went onto immediate “alert” and contacted the American military who avowed no knowledge of the launch.  Israel also came out denying it’s involvement; why would they do that?  Isn’t this a case of “me thinks they protest too much?”. My opinion is that these missiles were launch from one of the 6 Dolphin class submarines Israel has and was a deliberate attempt to sabotage the accord on the destruction of chemical weapons and draw Russia into the conflict so that would trigger American support for Israel.  America has a base in the South of Spain, close to where the launch took place – a perfect cover for yet another false flag operation!

So with failure after failure to instigate the conflagration in the Middle East, the Zionists are now going to resort to their most horrendous act yet, the exploding of a nuclear weapon on mainland America.

Some of you will have seen that recently, 7 very senior US military officials have been “fired” from their posts. They held positions whereby they were in command or control of part of the nuclear arsenal.  We have a Senator coming out and saying that a nuclear bomb will be delivered in the belly of a ship in Charleston harbour! On the very day that one of the Generals was “fired”, a nuclear warhead was unofficially transferred and is now “in the wind” supposedly under control of the Zionist administration. This is not a missile, as I understand, but a warhead – it needs to be manoeuvred to position. [Supposedly because Iran does not have the capability to deliver a warhead by missile; hence a missile attack could not conceivably blamed on them].

With all else having failed, we are now poised for the ultimate false flag operation, whereby a massive nuclear bomb will be detonated on continent America and blamed on Iran with a view to entrapping America into the Middle East war.  The Generals that were “fired” were obviously not going to be party to the crime, and/or likely to be whistle blowers.

Are you going to passively stand-by?

Source*

Related Topics:

Navigating 2013!

CIA Admits Staging Iran Coup in 1953‏

By Way of a Gift Obama gives Iran President what belongs to Iran

Iran Shows Truth Wins Out!

British Queen Profiting in Depleted Uranium*

Wahhabism as a Tool of Colonialism*

ICC Issues Warrant for the Arrest of Bush and Obama

Deleting Religious Thinking: A Governmental Agenda*

The Road to World War Three

Advertisements

Bill Gates’ Polio Vaccine Program Eradicates Children, Not Polio*

Bill Gates’ Polio Vaccine Program Eradicates Children, Not Polio*

By Christina England

Vaccines and DepopulationIn the depths of cyberspace lurks a press release written by the CDC, confirming that the OPV, or oral polio vaccination, given to millions of children throughout the developing world, is causing them to develop vaccine-induced polio. Instead of banning the vaccination, as one would expect, the CDC has decided in its wisdom that the best way to tackle the problem is to maintain a high rate of vaccination in all countries!

Yes, that is correct. The CDC recommends maintaining a high rate of vaccination, vaccinating as many children as possible with a vaccine that causes polio.

The CDC Spills the Beans

In 2012, the CDC wrote a press release titled Update on Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses — Worldwide, April 2011–June 2012. They wrote:

“In 1988, the World Health Assembly resolved to eradicate poliomyelitis worldwide. One of the main tools used in polio eradication efforts has been the live, attenuated oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). This inexpensive vaccine is administered easily by mouth, makes recent recipients resistant to infection by wild polioviruses (WPVs), and provides long-term protection against paralytic disease through durable humoral immunity. Nonetheless, rare cases of  vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis can occur both among     immunologically normal OPV recipients and their contacts and among persons  who are immunodeficient. In addition, vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs)  can emerge to cause polio outbreaks in areas with low OPV coverage and can  replicate for years in persons who are immunodeficient.”

 

“VDPVs can cause paralytic polio in humans and have the potential for sustained circulation. VDPVs  resemble WPVs biologically and differ from most vaccine-related poliovirus  (VRPV) isolates by having genetic properties consistent with prolonged replication or transmission. VDPVs were first identified by sequence analyses of poliovirus isolates.”

They continued

The CDC recommended that the best way to deal with this problem is mass vaccination. They stated:

“To prevent VDPV  emergence and spread, all countries should maintain high vaccination  coverage against all three poliovirus serotypes.”

Immunodeficiency disorders occur when the body’s immune response is reduced or absent. In other words, governments worldwide are actively promoting a vaccine that they know will cause millions of vulnerable, sick and immunodeficient children to develop vaccine-induced polio.

It appears that Bachchan is not the only Bollywood star helping Gates to promote vaccination. According to reports, Bill Gates also met up with Bollywood superstar Khan Aamir.

Commenting on their discussion, Gates posted the following comment on his blog:

“Talking toilets with Bollywood star Aamir Khan, discussing how satellites help fight disease. We were filming a question-and-answer segment in front of a studio audience for his show on New Delhi Television, one of India’s largest news networks. Prannoy was asking me and Bollywood star Aamir Khan about philanthropy, health, and India’s development …

This is an excellent piece of PR work by Bill Gates, as the people of India are totally in love with Bollywood and believe that if stars such as these are recommending their children to be vaccinated, then the vaccine must be safe!

In the meantime, the rates of vaccine-induced polio go through the roof.

The Rates of Vaccine-Induced Polio Soar

In 2010, the Polio Global Eradication Initiative, founded in 1988 by the World Health Organization, Rotary International, UNICEF, and the US CDC stated that there were only 42 cases of wild polio reported in India.

This all sounds extremely impressive, until we learn that public health experts estimate that between 100 and 180 children in India develop vaccine-associated polio paralysis (VAPP) every year.

“According to the Polio Global Eradication Initiative’s own statistics there were 42 cases of wild-type polio (WPV) reported in India in 2010, indicating that vaccine-induced cases of polio paralysis (100-180 annually) outnumber wild-type cases by a factor of 3-4. Even if we put aside the important question of whether or not the PGEI is accurately differentiating between wild and vaccine-associated polio cases in their statistics, we still must ask ourselves: should not the real-world effects of immunization, both good and bad, be included in PGEI’s measurement of success? For the dozens of     Indian children who develop vaccine-induced paralysis every year, the PGEI’s recent declaration of India as nearing “polio free” status, is not only disingenuous, but could be considered an attempt to minimize their obvious liability in having transformed polio from a natural disease vector  into a man-made (iatrogenic) one.”

The Activist Post stated that:

“In 2005, it was reported that children in a small village in the United States had contracted vaccine-derived polio. In Nigeria, >70 cases have been reported. In 2006, 1600 cases of vaccine-induced polio occurred in India, according to the Indian Medical Association Sub-Committee on Immunisation’s report on the Polio     Eradication Initiative. The point to be noted is that these cases were reported during repeated mass-immunization campaigns in which repeated doses of OPV were administered. In 2008, many cases of polio were reported in all provinces of Pakistan, where OPV is used for repeated mass-immunization campaigns.”

The Activist Post has a point, however; the public health ‘experts’ are way off target regarding the numbers of children suffering from vaccine-associated polio paralysis. According to the Oxford Journal – Clinical Infectious Diseases, there have been many more cases than those being reported. They reported that:

Over the years, the figures have continued to increase and a recent paper has reported that the number of children now suffering from vaccine-induced polio has reached epic proportions.

A paper written by Neetu Vashishi and Jacob Puliyel published in the Medical Journal of Medical Ethics recently stated that:

“… while India has  been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new     cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of  primum-non-nocere was violated.”

Conclusion

With numbers of this size being reported about vaccine-induced polio, you would think that someone, somewhere, would have tried to stop the devastation. However, instead of stopping the vaccination program and trying to rein in Bill Gates, it appears that governments worldwide have given Gates the green light to do exactly what he wants.

Many of the children affected with vaccine-induced polio will die as a result of their illness. This is not eradication of polio; this is eradication of the children of India, plain and simple. For eradication of a disease to be effective, you do not replace one disease for another; you must have disease-free, healthy children. In my opinion this is nothing more than another elaborate vaccination hoax and it needs to be stopped.

Source*

Related Topics:

Why Gene Therapy and Designated Genetic Disorders is Tinkering and not Science!

India: Bill Gates Financing Untested Vaccines that Spread the Disease It Claims to Cure!

Death and Autoimmune Diseases the Price of HPV Vaccines on 24,000 Indian Girls

Baby Girl Dies After 5 Shots of Vaccine*

1,700 Kids – Get Vaccinated or Get Out!

Who Owns Your Body?‏

Turning Childhood into a Disease*

Three Newborn Babies Die After Hepatitis B Vaccine*

Scientists Explain Why HPV Vaccines are Unsafe*

Australia Threatening Parents if they don’t Vaccinate their Children*

Refuse the Vaccine and We’ll Take Your Baby!

Jenny McCarthy Describes How She Cured her Sons Vaccine Caused Autism

U.K: A Re-Vamped Vaccine with a Dangerous Past Now Available!

Poor Asian, African, and Latin American Children Targeted by Gates and Others with Questionable Vaccines*

UK Vaccine Policy Taking One Step Closer to US Policed State

Medical Mafia Gunning for the Medicine that Works Against their Interest*

36 Infants Die After Receiving Vaccine*

The Eugenics of HPV Vaccine*

Flu Vaccines Banned in Six Countries

Caught Between Taking the Vaccine, and Refusing the Vaccine

Israeli Eugenics Program on Ethiopians*

NWO: Anti-Protest Laws, Following Canada, U.S. Now Spain and Egypt*

NWO: Anti-Protest Laws, Following Canada, U.S. Now Spain and Egypt

Egypt Protests 4Egypt’s interim president, Adly Mansour, has enacted a new protest law that rights groups say will severely curtail freedom of assembly, and could prohibit the kinds of mass demonstrations that forced presidents Hosni Mubarak and Mohamed Morsi from power.

The law will force would-be protesters to seek seven separate permissions to take to the streets, and bans overnight sit-ins such as the Tahrir Square protests of early 2011. Activists will have to go to court to appeal against any rejected applications – a restriction lawyers argue will render legal demonstration almost impossible.

The law also bans any unsanctioned gatherings – either in public or in private – of 10 or more people, and will give the police the final say on whether a protest can take place. As a result, the law is deemed just as restrictive as a similar protest bill debated and later discarded under Morsi, whose own authoritarian instincts contributed to his downfall. His version – which was written by the same official – would have made demonstrators seek five separate permissions, instead of seven, but outlined more draconian punishments.

“This law brings Mubarak’s era back,” said Gamal Eid, the director of the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information and one of Egypt’s leading human rights laws. Eid even argued that the new law compared unfavourably with repressive legislation drafted while Egypt was still a British protectorate.

“It’s weird that the colonialists would have a law that is more just than the supposedly post-revolutionary one,” he added.

The law has been the subject of fierce debate in Egypt, where activists see its enactment as a litmus test for democracy in the post-Morsi era.

Nineteen Egyptian rights groups signed a joint statement last week condemning the bill while it was being debated. Read on >>>

Related Topics:

Egypt: Silencing all Voices Accept the One it Wants to Hear*

U.S: Blocking the Right to Protest

Occupy World: 10,000 March Against Anti-Protest Law*

Mexico Protest Blacked Out By Media

Right to Protest Claimed Under the Magna Carta

NWO: ‘Annoying’ Behaviour Now Under Police Control in the U.K. *

Protesting Firemen Soak Cops in Foam

NWO: UK Effectively Bans Homeschooling*

LOVE & FEAR*

Mood Altering Compound Sprayed Across FEMA Region

UK: Royal Charter Bypasses Parliament on Press Regulation*

Killer Cop on the Rise

Deleting Religious Thinking: A Governmental Agenda*

NWO: On Hold – DHS Tracking Entire Cities

NWO: On Hold – DHS Tracking Entire Cities

From Alexandra

Strange new off-white boxes popping up in downtown Seattle use wi-fi networks that can record the last 1,000 locations of a person using their cellphone’s MAC address, but the Department of Homeland Security – which funded this “Mesh Network” to the tune of $2.7 million dollars – has refused to address the nightmare privacy implications of a system that could lead to the permanent tracking of an entire city’s population.

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com

A report by The Stranger, a weekly Seattle newspaper, exposes how the boxes, which are attached to utility poles and include vertical antennae, can track cellphones even if they are not connected to the system’s wi-fi network.

Aruba – the company that provided the boxes to the Seattle Police Department – brags in its technical literature about how the boxes can keep track of “rogue” or “unassociated” devices, in other words your cellphone even if you have refused to let the system access your device’s wi-fi component.

The user’s guide for one of Aruba’s recent software products states: “The wireless network has a wealth of information about unassociated and associated devices.” That software includes “a location engine that calculates associated and unassociated device location every 30 seconds by default… The last 1,000 historical locations are stored for each MAC address.”
When reporters Matt Fikse-Verkerk and Brendan Kiley asked the Seattle Police Department and the Department of Homeland Security to explain what the boxes were for, the DHS refused to comment and Seattle Police detective Monty Moss would only state that the department “is not comfortable answering policy questions when we do not yet have a policy.”

Detective Moss also added that the mesh network would not be used for “surveillance purposes… without City Council’s approval and the appropriate court authorization.” Note that he didn’t say the mesh network couldn’t be used for the surveillance functions we asked about, only that it wouldn’t—at least until certain people in power say it can. That’s the equivalent of a “trust us” and a handshake.

The justification for the mesh network is that it will allow police, firefighters and other first responders to communicate as well as stream surveillance video on a private uncluttered network during an emergency.

However, the system is, “adept at seeing all the devices that move through their coverage area and visually mapping the locations of those devices in real time for the system administrators’ convenience.” The SPD has also indicated that it plans “citywide deployment” of the network, opening the door for mass unfettered surveillance of Seattle’s 634,000 residents.

Seattle council member Bruce Harrell justified the mesh network being used for surveillance purposes by making reference to the Boston bombings. “While I understand that a lot of people have concerns about the government having access to this information, when we have large public gatherings like the situation like in Boston and something bad happens, the first thing we want to know is how are we using technology to capture that information,” Harrell told KIRO-TV.

“We are being told that such measures will help police “solve more crime”. We are being told that such measures will “keep people safe”. But what about our privacy? Doesn’t that count for something? What about the Fourth Amendment? Are our most cherished liberties and freedoms going to be thrown into the trash just because we live “in a more dangerous world”?” asks Michael Snyder.

As we have highlighted, this is just one of several examples of Big Brother spying apparatus being installed on the streets with barely a whimper of protest in comparison to the outrage that was prompted by the revelations of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Hi-tech street lights called Intellistreets that are linked via a ubiquitous wi-fi network and can record conversations are now popping up in major cities across the United States.

According to the company behind them, Intellistreets lighting systems can analyze voices, act as surveillance cameras and make loudspeaker security announcements. They also have the capability to track people who wear RFID tags. The fact that the lights are all linked back to a central data hub via a wi-fi network also mean they have the same capability to track people via their cellphone’s MAC address.

A separate network of sensors installed in at least 70 major U.S. cities called ShotSpotter, ostensibly designed to alert authorities to gunshot locations, also have the ability to record street conversations using microphones, according to a 2012 New York Times article. This led the ACLU to warn that the technology could represent a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment if misused.

As we detailed in a lengthy report yesterday, when these technologies are combined with the fact that virtually every new consumer item can be linked to the internet (and therefore tracked and wiretapped), this represents a surveillance grid that makes NSA wiretapping of phone calls and emails look antiquated in comparison.

The Seattle police chief has turned off the surveillance system pending a reassessment of the program which includes public input. This occurred due to public outcry over privacy concerns. As a resident of the Seattle area, I share the concern of many fellow Seattleites over the stealthy manner in which the system was installed.

Related Topics:

NWO: Smart ID Hits Descending on the British*

NWO: ‘Annoying’ Behaviour Now Under Police Control in the U.K. *

NWO: UK Effectively Bans Homeschooling*

LOVE & FEAR*

Feeding the Homeless Now Illegal*

GM Wheat Shutting Us Down!?*

Mood Altering Compound Sprayed Across FEMA Region

UK: Royal Charter Bypasses Parliament on Press Regulation*

GMO Technology Brought Soaring Cancer, Birth Defects and Failing Farms to Argentina*

International Effort to Stop U.S. Big Brother aka NSA

How Forced Government Schooling has Created a Dysfunctional Society

Implant RFID Chip Technology in Students without Parental Consent*

Killer Cop on the Rise

Why I Will Never, Ever, Go Back to the United States

Deleting Religious Thinking: A Governmental Agenda*

Your Bank Account does not belong to you alone!*

Myanmar: Buddhists Destroy Arakan’s Last Mosque*

Myanmar: Buddhists Destroy Arakan’s Last Mosque*

This is not the act of a Buddhist whom we all respect…

By Rizwan Khatik

A group of Buddhist ‘monks’ with the help of the military attacked the last standing mosque in Arakan’s Kyauk Phyu city, damaging the worshipping house severely and destroying the minaret of what was an 800-year old mosque. The fire which continued for two hours also damaged nearby homes. Two people died one of which was a Buddhist ‘monk.’

“Yesterday evening, we heard about some people attempting to destroy the mosque and this morning, I went to look at it and saw that some damage had been done,” Htun Naing of the Kyaukphyu Public Network told the Democratic Voice of Burma on Tuesday, November 19.

The attack started on Monday evening when a group of Buddhists gathered to celebrate the full moon festival.

The attack comes in the wake of OIC’s delegation Four-day visit to Burma, which has concluded last Saturday.

“Buddhist Arakanese locals] were planning to stage a protest, when the OIC came to visit, to oppose its plan to open an office in the town and I guess the incident yesterday could be connected to this,” said Naing.

Ahead of OIC’s visit last week hundreds of Buddhists took onto the streets last Tuesday to protest against the visit, accusing the organization of being ‘biased’.

Last Friday, about 5,000 Buddhists staged a demonstration against OIC visit in Arakan’s capital Sittwe.

Muslims in Burma and have been facing repeated attacks by Buddhists in recent months.

Since June, hundreds of thousands of Muslims have been forced to flee their homes in western Burma after attacks from Buddhist mobs on their areas.

Not only mosques have been destroyed, but also mosques, Muslim schools, Muslim cemeteries, and there has been detention of Muslim scholars.

Arakan Province is situated in the southwest of the country, where there has been assassinations and the destruction of mosques.

Arakan is separate from Buddhist Burma by a range of mountains called the Arakan Mountains, and their province is about 20,000 square miles in area, with Akyab as its provincial capital. It has a population of around 4,000,000, of whom 70% are Muslims, 25% Buddhists, and 5% of other faiths.

The Rohingyas take their name from the ancient name of Arakan, and Islam was introduced to it by Arab merchants who visited it in the first century of the Hijri calendar, followed by other waves of Muslim visitors, who brought with them, the Message of Islam.

In 1406 AD, King Naramakhbala, who was the ruler of Arakan, was attacked by the king of Burma, and he had to take refuge with Sultan Nasiruddin Shah of Bengal, and, in the process, he embraced Islam 24 years later. He chose for himself the Muslim name Suleiman Shah, and was later able, with the help of his Bengal host, to regain his lost kingdom.

In 1420 AD, the first Islamic state was declared in Arakan, under the leadership of Suleiman Shah, of course, and for the next 350 years the country was ruled by one Muslim ruler or another. But in 1784 the country was once again attacked and occupied by Buddhist Burma, and when Britain took Burma in 1824, the Muslim population in Arakan was rendered weaker and weaker.

Then in 1948 Burma became independent from Britain, and despite all efforts to gain independence for Arakan as a separate state, those efforts did not meet with success.

The President of the Gulf-based Muslim Students’ Federation, Ibrahim Muhammad Atiqurrahman, told IINA that Myanmar’s Government demolished 72 mosques in the year 2001 alone.

Atiqurrahman went on to say that the government of Myanmar has now set up a committee to survey the Muslims of Arakan and their properties and other types of wealth, which committee has been imposing exorbitantly large tax assessments on them, and anyone who fails to pay up is jailed, unless he could pay a huge bride to the committee’s officials.

Many displaced Muslims, have been forced to work in the construction of homes for the Burmese soldiers and their families, or forced to build roads and other facilities for the repressive government.

Expelled Muslims have been allocated to Buddhists. Waqf (endowment) and Muslim owned land have been confiscated, and denied freedom of movement within the country, and out of the country.

According to the amendment to the citizenship law that was effective from 1982, the Rohingya Muslims of Burma have been deprived of their Burmese citizenship, and therefore they could not involve themselves in business.

Muslim women have been denied the right to wear hijab, and have been subjected to rape, and forced to work in military barracks.

The U.N. describes the Rohingya as among the most persecuted minority group in the world, yet nothing is done except through charity.

Sources:

Arakan’s Muslims muslimpopulation.com/asia/Myanmar/Burma%20Muslim.php

Buddhists Destroy Arakans Last Mosque http://www.timesofummah.com/2013/11/23/myanmar-buddhists-destroy-arakans-last-mosque/

Related Topics:

Planned Genocide in Progress*

Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Silent on the Persecution of the Rohingya Muslims*

Deleting Religious Thinking: A Governmental Agenda*

Desecration of Churches and Mosques, Act of Outsiders States Bishop*

Egypt Closes 1,000 Mosques

Bulldozing Islamic Heritage

Israeli Barbarism: 8 Things You Can Stop Buying*

Israeli Barbarism: 8 Things You Can Stop Buying*

By Alex Kane

When tax time rolls around each year, every American citizen gives $21.59 in military aid to Israel, according to the U.S. Campaign to End the Occupation. But that’s not the only way American citizens contribute to the Israeli military, which has occupied Palestinian land for 46 years, and the West Bank settlement project that accompanies the occupation.

Intel Corp

April 30, 2014

The Intel Corp. will invest $5 billion to $6 billion in its southern Israel factory.

The company is filing an investment plan for the Kiryat Gat work with Israel’s Ministry of the Economy, the Israeli business daily Globes reported, citing company sources. Intel could receive a grant for about 5 percent of the job — some $300,000 million, according to Globes.

Intel, which has been operating in Israel for 40 years, has four development centers and two production plants in the country.

The company will make an official announcement in the coming weeks, according to reports.

Motorola

This company also profits from its relationship to the Israeli army. In 2011, the company, which was most well known for its phones, was split into two. One of the spin-offs, named Motorola Solutions, has a close working relationship with the Israeli government and army through its Israeli subsidiary–Motorola Solutions Israel. (Motorola Solutions does not make phones, though it does produce mobile computers, tablets and computer accessories. Still, Motorola had a relationship with the Israeli army when it was a singular company producing phones.)

According to Who Profits?, Motorola Solutions Israel won a contract in 2005 to provide Israeli settlements with fences, and its radar detection systems have been installed in at least 20 illegal settlements throughout the West Bank. The same system is also used for Israel’s separation barrier, which was ruled illegal by the International Court of Justice in 2004.

The company also created a mobile communication system for the Israeli army so that soldiers could speak with one another when serving in the West Bank. Lastly, Motorola Solutions Israel provided the army with electronic bomb fuses until 2009, when the specific department of the company that made the fuses was sold to Aeronautics Defense Systems.

Hewlett Packard

The popular information technology company is most well known in the U.S. for making printers. Hewlett Packard also makes products like digital cameras, personal computers and smartphones. It holds the top spot globally for shipments of PCs.

But that’s not all HP manufactures. Services it provides have been sold to the Israeli military.

According to Who Profits?, HP owns EDS Israel, which since 2009 has been referred to as “HP Enterprise Services.” This branch of Hewlett Packard provides the Israeli Ministry of Defense with what’s called the “Basel System,” a biometric access control system that regulates the permit system for Palestinian workers.

In 2009, HP was contracted to administer the Israeli Navy’s information technology infrastructure, and eventually was paid to administer the entire army’s technology systems. HP also won a contract in 2009 to provide all computer equipment to the Israeli army.

In addition, HP is involved with the West Bank settlement project. The IT company provides services and technologies to two major settlements, and also “takes part in the ‘Smart City’ project in the illegal West Bank settlement of Ariel, providing a storage system for the settlement’s municipality,” the Who Profits? project reports.

Nokia

Nokia have started to invest heavily in Israel.

Nokia general manager Lars Wolf said in an interview with The Jerusalem Post (4 March 2001): “We are really focusing on Israel from all perspectives, because we have an internal project called ‘Project Israel’ which means we are looking at Israel from a networks perspective, from the perspective of Nokia Ventures Organization, and also from the perspective of Nokia Research Center “.

Nokia Venture Partners, a branch of Nokia Ventures Organization,  launched a new $500 million fund in December 2000 and allowed that a “disproportionate” amount of it would go into Israeli companies. Nokia Research Center is on the lookout for Israeli start-ups with which it can cooperate. Nokia Research Center has been on the lookout for Israeli start-ups with which it can cooperate. And, of course, Nokia Networks is looking to sell its infrastructure in a country whose cellular penetration has reached 70%.

“Our goal in Israel is to become the leader in Internet Protocol mobility, [as well as] core, radio and broadband access for networks,” said Wolf. “You can imagine for yourself who are the customers.” “On the network side, we have a developed market and strong operators we would like to cooperate with. There is a real business opportunity here for 3G.”

Sabra hummus


Sabra is another Israeli company that seems to be in every Americans’ refrigerator and brand-name supermarket. It may taste good to dip chips and vegetables in, but it also boosts the Israeli military while marketing hummus as exclusively Israeli.

The hummus company has embarked on a major push to sell its products to consumers. Sabra has ramped up its advertising in recent years, and it’s been quite successful. Earlier this year, the Huffington Post reported that it has captured 60% of a hummus market whose sales have been increasing in the U.S.

Sabra hummus is partly owned by an Israeli company named the Strauss Group, which has “adopted” an elite IDF unit. (PepsiCo also owns Sabra.) The company’s website has boasted of providing the Golani Brigade “with an ongoing variety of food products for their training or missions, and provide personal care packages for each soldier that completes the path.” The Strauss Group has also said it gives funds to the IDF unit for “welfare, cultural and educational activities, such as pocket money for underprivileged soldiers, sports and recreational equipment, care packages, and books and games for the soldiers’ club.”

While that language is no longer found on the Strauss Group website, the company still defends the IDF. In 2011, Ofta Strauss, the company’s chairwoman, told Forbes magazine that “Israeli soldiers are not army; Israeli soldiers are our kids.”

The Golani Brigade played key roles in the Israeli army’s assault on the Gaza Strip in 2008-09 during Operation Cast Lead. Widespread human rights abuses and possible war crimes were committed by the Israeli army during the assault.

Tribe Hummus

Tribe is the second largest hummus company in the U.S. It is also tied to problematic Israeli practices.

The company is partly owned by Osem, which partners with the Jewish National Fund, a group that has worked intimately with the Israeli government. The JNF played a key role before the establishment of the State of Israel by participating in plans with Israel’s founder, David Ben-Gurion, to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from their land in 1948. The JNF’s record hasn’t gotten much better since then.

After Israel was established, the state leased the JNF land, and eventually the fund came to own 13% of all land in Israel, the majority of which was originally owned by Palestinians. Their charter explicitly limits the leasing of their land to Jews only in a state where 20% of the population is Palestinian. The JNF has planted forests all around Israel, some of them on top of destroyed Palestinian villages.

One of the more egregious actions the JNF has participated in recently is the repeated bulldozing of the Bedouin village of Al Araqib, one of many “unrecognized” areas in Israel the government refuses to connect to electricity or water systems. The JNF has partnered with Israeli police to destroy Al Araqib an astonishing 50 plus times in order to build a forest in the village.

Ahava

Plenty of stores carry Ahava, which means “love” in Hebrew. You can find its Dead Sea-extracted beauty products in New York City’s Ricky’s shops, in Nordstrom and in Bed, Bath and Beyond, among others. But what the products won’t tell you is that they’re manufactured in a West Bank settlement, owned by settlements and that they’re illegally exploiting Palestinian natural resources.

Ahava, which rakes in about $150 million a year, is partly owned by West Bank settlements themselves; 37.5% of the company is owned by the settlement of Mitzpe Shalem, while 7.5% is owned by the settlement of Kibbutz Kalia. Furthermore, 37% of the company is owned by Hamashbir Holdings, which also invests in the Orad Group, a company that produces electronic detection systems for use on the West Bank separation barrier.

The main factory where Ahava products are made is in Mitzpe Shalem, which sits in the eastern part of the West Bank and is on the shore of the Dead Sea. Ahava excavates mud from the shores of the Dead Sea, despite it being a violation of international law to exploit the resources of an occupied territory.

Since 2009, the group CodePink has led a campaign aimed at boycotting Ahava and urging stores to drop its products.

Source*

Related Topics:

Harvesting Palestinian Organs*

Wahhabism as a Tool of Colonialism*

Egypt Hires US Lobbyist with Ties to Israel*

Egypt Worsens Conditions for Gazans*

Ashkenazi Jews are Genetically European

US, Saudis-Israeli, Qatar “Arab Spring Coup” in Sudan*

The Road to World War Three

Syrian Carve Up Begins: Israel Grants Oil Rights inside Syria!*

PepsiCo’s Naked Juice Laced with Synthetic and GMO Ingredients

Afghanistan Says No to U.S. Demand*

Afghanistan Says No to U.S. Demand*

Even when there seems no light at the end of a tunnel of endless disregard for geographical and personal sovereignty: exploitation, sexploitation, being sunk into a cycle of poverty while one’s natural resources are being literally stolen by those who claim to ‘help’ something happens to tell us that all we have to do is have faith in our true selves, and then the real battle begins. Let’s pray that the elections honor this.

Afghanistan on Friday rebuffed a US demand to sign a highly anticipated security pact as soon as possible, insisting the document must wait until after next year’s presidential election.

Washington warned Kabul on Thursday to sign the Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) as soon as possible, with senior officials hinting that delaying beyond the end of this year could mean no post-2014 US troop presence.

The latest US run-in with President Hamid Karzai was set off by the Afghan leader saying the painstakingly negotiated deal would not be signed until after the election in April.

US officials bristled, saying the pact, which governs the conditions of any post-war American counter-terrorism and training mission in Afghanistan, must be signed by the end of the year.

The White House said it needed a swift decision from Karzai to start planning the footprint of any US forces, and warned Obama had not yet decided whether or not to keep US forces in Afghanistan.

“Failure to get this approved and signed by the end of the year would prevent the United States and our allies from being able to plan for a post-2014 presence,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.

Karzai had said the pact currently under consideration by a loya jirga, a meeting of tribal chieftains, could only be signed “when our elections are conducted, correctly and with dignity”.

His spokesman Aimal Faizi stood firm on the issue on Friday.

“Security, peace and good elections are key to the signing of the BSA,” Faizi told AFP

“Let’s wait and see what will the loya jirga decide on the document. If approved, as the president said, it will be signed after elections.”

Senior US officials speaking on condition of anonymity were blunt, warning that if there were no BSA in force, there would be no US troop garrison in Afghanistan after NATO combat troops leave in 2014.

“We desperately need this pact”

Some jirga delegates voiced frustration at Karzai’s unexpected announcement — the latest in a long line of antagonistic outbursts.

“This should be signed by the current government not be left to the next one,” Aminullah Muavez, a member of the provincial peace council of Nuristan — a Taliban stronghold in the country’s northeast — told AFP.

“If we don’t sign it soon, the US might change their mind and withdraw from Afghanistan.”

Karzai on Thursday told jirga delegates that the BSA would allow up to 15,000 foreign troops to stay in the war-torn country.

Afghanistan goes to the polls on April 5 to elect a successor to Karzai, who must step down after his two terms. A credible election is seen as crucial to the country’s future stability.

The jirga is to give its decision Sunday on the BSA, the text of which was only agreed after months of tortuous negotiations with Washington.

It is widely expected to approve it, though possibly with recommendations or conditions, after which it must also be approved by the Afghan parliament before Karzai can sign it into effect.

Tahira Mirzad, a former MP representing Kapisa province at the Jirga, told AFP the country urgently needed the BSA.

“This is a sensitive phase we are going through at the moment. it’s a chaotic phase, every day we have attacks by the enemies, there is a lack of proper training for security forces, we desperately need this pact to be signed,” she said.

Obama stepped in this week with a letter to confirm a deal on the vexed question of US forces raiding Afghan homes.

The letter released by Karzai’s office said US forces would not enter Afghan homes for military operations “except under extraordinary circumstances involving urgent risk to life and limb of US nationals”.

The issue is a sensitive one in Afghanistan and had for a time appeared to pose a serious threat to the deal.

Supporters of the deal say it is vital for post-2014, when the bulk of NATO’s 75,000 troops will pull out. The Taliban insurgency this year has reached levels of violence not seen since 2010, according to the United Nations.

The Taliban condemned the jirga as an American plot and threatened to target its delegates if they approve the deal.

A draft text released by Kabul Wednesday appeared to show Karzai had bowed to a US demand that American troops would not be tried in local courts if they are accused of crimes.

A similar security deal between the United States and Iraq collapsed in 2011 over the issue of whether American troops would be answerable to local courts, leading Washington to pull its forces out.

Source*

Related Topics:

Why the U.S. won’t get the Hell out of Afghanistan*

Afghanistan: Is It Like Everything Else, About the Money?

Weaving to Reclaim the Soul: War Rugs

Reawakening Afghan Gardens with a Purpose

Terror Rains Down on Afghanis

Gambia Says No More to the Commonwealth*

Hungary Tells IMF Where to Go!*

FBI not Allowed in Iceland!