Archive | February 5, 2014

Paedophilia: Enough Evidence against the Queen of England and Her Prime Minister*

Paedophilia: Enough Evidence against the Queen of England and Her Prime Minister*

Last Thursday activist David Compan was released from the London Park Royal Mental Health Centre. The psychiatric facility had been swamped with calls about his forced detainment there. David, plus his wife, was arrested on three occasions this month – without being charged. His apparent “crime” was daring to post Brussels common law court arrest warrants on the Queen, Cameron, former Catholic Pope Joseph Ratzinger and 27 other global elites. www.itccs.org

The present Catholic Pope Francis Bergoglio was alleged to be part of child trafficking in an international pedophile ring. Victims who were prostituted as children at the Vatican have come forward, along with survivors who alleged they were abused in international pedophile rings. Victims have also alleged sex abuse and murder of children by former Pope Ratzinger, Catholic Cardinal Bernard Alfrink of Utrecht, a second Catholic Cardinal, a French judge, Belgian priests, other members of the British Royal family and Prince Bernhard of Holland

A former Argentine government official recently agreed to testify about Bergoglio’s role in a pedophile ring during Argentine’s Junta “Dirty War.” A Brussels international Common Law court was slated on the matter to begin March 15 2014. On Feb. 25 2013 six judges of a Brussels common law court found the Queen, Cameron, Ratzinger and 37 other global elites guilty in the disappearance of 50,000 Canadian indigent children. Cases were prosecuted by the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State, ITCCS.www.iclcj.com Evidence presented could be reviewed in ITCCS’s Kevin Annett’s “Hidden No Longer” www.hiddennolonger.com and www.ChildAbuseRecovery.com

Why common law courts? Common Law court actions were proven effective. In Feb. 2013 Catholic Pope Joseph Ratzinger resigned within days of being issued his arrest warrant. Should parents consider common law courts to protect their children? Yes, evidently. On Oct. 10 1964 Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip were seen taking ten native children from the Canadian Kamloops Residential School. The age-ten children haven’t been heard of since. Canadian courts refused to hear the case that also involved the 50,000 Canadian missing indigent children.

Are we in danger if global elites were not held responsible for their crimes? Evidently so. Two witnesses died of mysterious causes prior to the Feb. 2013 Brussels court that convicted the Queen, Cameron, former Pope Ratzinger and 37 other elites of Crimes Against Humanity. Would our present court system prosecute international pedophile rings? Evidently not. ITCCS efforts for excavation of 31 child mass grave sites of the 50,000 missing children have been thwarted since the first was discovered in 2008. The child mass grave sites were on grounds of 80 Canadian government-owned residential schools run by the Catholic and Anglican churches and the United Church of Canada.

09 February 2014

Pope and Queen agreed to suppress all evidence of child abuse in 2010. The ‘Holyrood’ agreement.

The Crown of England is also named in the new ICLCJ lawsuit.

“Every Anglican clergy, like every catholic priest, must now cover up the raping of children in their church if they want to keep their job – thanks to the Queen of England” said Kevin Annett to a crowd of reporters and onlookers at the media event.

“By her September, 2010 agreement with former Pope Benedict to abide by the Catholic ‘protect the rapist’ policy known as Crimen Sollicitationas, Elizabeth Windsor has formed a criminal conspiracy and committed treason against the laws of England and of Nations. That monster of a child-killing church and state must be slain, with or without the help of the United Nations.”

Kevin also announced that an arrest warrant may be issued against him soon by the Crown of England’s Privy Council office and the government of Canada. He announced that in such an event, he may be compelled to seek political asylum in the United States in order to continue the prosecution of the Vatican and Crown of England for crimes against children.

The complete transcript of Kevin’s press statement is reprinted below, along with a youtube broadcast of the event.

ITCCS Breaking News Release – Friday, February 7, 2014

New York City:

Outside the Canadian consulate in midtown Manhattan today, ITCCS Field Secretary Rev. Kevin Annett rebuked the United Nations for its “toothless” statement on Vatican crimes against children, and announced the launch of a new international court case against institutionalized child trafficking.

Annett said,

“If the United Nations had have been serious about combating the organized rape and trafficking of children
that is allowed and encouraged by catholic canon law, it would have treated the Vatican as the criminal organization that it is, by revoking the diplomatic status of the Vatican at the United Nations and barring its representation on U.N. Committees.

“It would have encouraged all nations to nullify their tax exemptions to the catholic church and revoked the financial concordats that unlawfully funnel billions of dollars of tax payers’ money to the Vatican Bank. And it would have declared the Vatican incorporated to be a transnational criminal organization under the U.N. Convention by that name, and brought civil court action against all known child raping priests, and the high church officials who protect them.

“But the United Nations did none of that, and it has thereby enabled the church to continue its reign of terror against not tens of thousands of children, as the UN statement claims, but against millions of innocent little victims, and millions of victims to be … And so it is now up to the people of the world through their lawful common law courts and enforcement, to directly stop the crimes of the Vatican.”

Annett announced that the same Common Law Court of Justice that successfully prosecuted former Pope Benedict and compelled his resignation will now try Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio, for crimes against humanity.

Bergoglio will be named as the chief defendant in the case that will be initiated in the International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) in Brussels by March 31, 2014. Top officials of the Jesuit Order and the Crown of England are also named in the court action.

In a startling news announcement last Monday, Jorge Bergoglio has been named by a former member of the Argentine military junta of organizing the trafficking of kidnapped children of political prisoners during that country’s Dirty War of the 1970′s, in which over 30,000 people died. (ITCCS posting, 3 February, 2014 at www.itccs.org)

The Crown of England is also named in the new ICLCJ lawsuit.

“Every Anglican clergy, like every catholic priest, must now cover up the raping of children in their church if they want to keep their job – thanks to the Queen of England” said Kevin Annett to a crowd of reporters and onlookers at the media event.

“By her September, 2010 agreement with former Pope Benedict to abide by the catholic ‘protect the rapist’ policy known as Crimen Sollicitationas, Elizabeth Windsor has formed a criminal conspiracy and committed treason against the laws of England and of Nations. That monster of a child-killing church and state must be slain, with or without the help of the United Nations.”

Kevin also announced that an arrest warrant may be issued against him soon by the Crown of England’s Privy Council office and the government of Canada. He announced that in such an event, he may be compelled to seek political asylum in the United States in order to continue the prosecution of the Vatican and Crown of England for crimes against children.

The complete transcript of Kevin’s press statement is reprinted below, along with a youtube broadcast of the event.

Rev. Annett can be reached at hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com and 386-323-5774 (USA, messages).

Sources: www.itccs.org , www.iclcj.com

Issued by ITCCS Central, Brussels
7 February, 2014

Press Statement of Rev. Kevin Annett – Friday, February 7, 2014 in New York City

Hello and welcome. My name is Kevin Annett and I’m the Field Secretary of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State, and its affiliated common law courts of justice. I’m here today on behalf of the Tribunal to make several important announcements.

This week, the United Nations released a toothless and unenforceable statement on the rape and torture of children by the Roman Catholic church that has done nothing to stop that enormous crime, and has allowed it to continue. And so it is now up to the people of the world to halt the crimes of the Vatican by taking direct action through their own common law courts and enforcement methods, as we began to do last year.

If the United Nations was serious about combating the organized rape and trafficking of children that is allowed and encouraged by catholic canon law, it would treat the Vatican as the criminal organization it is, by revoking the diplomatic status of the Vatican at the U.N. and barring its representation on U.N. Committees.

It would encourage all nations to nullify their tax exemptions to the catholic church and revoked the financial concordats that unlawfully funnel billions of dollars of tax payers’ money to the Vatican Bank. And it would declare the Vatican Incorporated to be a transnational criminal organization under the U.N. Convention by that name, and brought civil court action against all known child raping priests, and the high church officials who protect them.

But the United Nations did none of that, and it has thereby enabled the church to continue its reign of terror against not simply tens of thousands of children, as the UN statement claims, but against millions of innocent little victims, and millions of victims to be.

The United Nations’ refusal to take firm action against the crimes of the catholic church is unexplainable and unconscionable in the light of the revelation last Monday that the criminal conspiracy to aid child rapists was broadened by the Vatican during 2010 to include the Church of England; and that conspiracy implicates the present Pope Francis as well.

Last Monday, our organization revealed that on September 16, 2010, the Vatican and the Crown of England, through their chief officers, entered into a formal criminal conspiracy to traffick children and aid and abet child rapists throughout the world.

That conspiracy occurred between Queen Elizabeth Windsor and former Pope Benedict, Joseph Ratzinger, at Holyrood Castle in Edinburgh, where as a condition of the merger of the Church of England and the Church of Rome, the Queen agreed to place all Anglicans under the notorious catholic law known as Crimen Sollicitationas. This law requires that all child rape be covered up within the church, thereby obstructing justice and the sovereign laws of every country in the world in which catholicism or anglicanism operates, including the United States and Canada.

The present Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio, has not only concealed this conspiracy but has recently been accused by a key eyewitness of organizing the trafficking of children of political prisoners in Argentina under the military dictatorship there.

Last Tuesday, on the basis of these facts, the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State petitioned the Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels to formally charge Jorge Bergoglio, Pope Francis, with abetting human trafficking, inciting treason and crime, and subverting the Law of Nations through the policies and actions of his church. The opening hearings of this case will begin no later than Monday, March 31, 2014, after which a Public Summons will be served on Jorge Bergoglio.

The International Common Law Court is also being asked to name as defendants in this case the corporations of the City of London and its Crown of England, as well as the Vatican and the Jesuit Order. These corporations and their officers will be named as accessories to an ongoing crime against the children of the world enunciated in the catholic canon law known as Crimen Sollicitationas and by the Holyrood agreement between the Vatican and the Crown of England.

Let me now take a moment to share the second part of my announcement today, and why I am saying this in front of the Canadian consulate. For this past week, I was informed by a British Member of Parliament that the Crown of England’s Privy Council in London is considering issuing an order to the Canadian Governor General and Prime Minister’s office to have me arrested and prosecuted for what they call sedition.

In other words, I may be charged with treason by the British monarchy under the same repressive laws that imprisoned some of America’s Founding Fathers and many of her patriots. And I am not alone in being targeted in this way: for three of my close associates, in England and Canada, were recently arrested and held without charges for having spoken out about the crimes committed against our children every day by the Crown and its courts, and sanctioned by Elizabeth Windsor.

It is Queen Elizabeth who has inflicted treason on her own people, by violating the English laws she swore to protect by acting at the behest of a foreign power and placing England under the jurisdiction of that power: the Church of Rome and its child-killing policies that subvert the laws of England, Canada and all of humanity. For that is what Elizabeth Windsor did on September 16, 2010, when with the connivance of Pope Benedict she required that all Anglicans aid child rapists. She has thereby violated her coronation oath and under British law, she and all of her heirs must either immediately abdicate or be removed by Parliament.

It’s no accident that my possible arrest was ordered by the Crown the very same week that we publicly revealed the Holyrood Agreement. But no amount of threats or imprisonment of their critics can change the fact that it is the Vatican and the British monarchy who are together committing crime. For it is not simply individual figureheads, but these institutions of church and state as a whole, that are criminal bodies, and they must be abolished root and branch to end their reign of terror on our children.

In truth, the Crown no longer has any legal authority in Canada or in England, for criminal bodies have no legitimate authority, under the law. The writs of the Crown, like those of the Vatican, are null and void. Only when a new Republic and Constitution is established in Canada will there exist any lawful political system in my country. And so I appeal to all Americans to help us achieve the same liberties won by your people against the British Crown in 1776. If fighting for such a free country is considered treason, then so be it.

And so finally, let me announce that in the event of my arrest, detaining or persecution by any agent of the governments of Canada or Great Britain, I have been legally advised to seek political asylum in the United States. If I do so, it will be for a single purpose: to continue in my God-given purpose of defending the lives and liberty of children everywhere from predators in high places; and to let justice roll down like a river and wash away the evil and corruption of the present time.

Let me say that I am hopeful of our future, and of our upcoming prosecution of Jorge Bergoglio and the system that he represents, because from London to Rome, that system is toppling. We must covenant ourselves into new relationships under Natural Law and cleanse ourselves of the criminal system that is destroying our world, our children and our future. And so I look to the American people and to the common law that binds us all to uphold all of us in this purpose. May God help us allow freedom to reign, and our children to have a future. Thank you.

Related Topics:

Imprisoned for Thought Crime*

Conscientious Police Officer Warned off British Elite Paedophile Ring*

Hollywood Pedophilia on the Line: Corey Feldman Speaks Out*

Sex attacks on under-11s rise by 14 per cent in one year

Head of Children’s Homes Accused of 49 Counts of Paedophilia*

British Family Courts Why the Secrecy?

A Child’s Personal Sovereignty… Stolen!*

Love Even Affects the Size of a Child’s Brain*

Belgian Monarchy’s Crimes against Humanity Meets an Unexpected Islamic Challenge

Pope Criminalizes Vatican Leaks of Child Prostitution and Sexual Abuse*

The Paedophilia Past of Eurozone’s Chancellor Merkel’s Coalition Party*

Cardinal Keith O’Brien ‘blocked’ independent sex abuse inquiry

‘Third Gender’ Official in Germany from November

Child Sacrifice and Trafficking in Holland, and Abroad: An Eyewitness Comes Forward and Names her Torturers – An Exclusive Breaking News Report from ITCCS Central Office and its Dutch Affiliates

Moroccans Say No Royal Pardon for Spanish Elite Paedophile Network*

Inuit Children Defended Themselves against Paedophile Priest*

British Education System Designed to Polarise People*

British Education System Designed to Polarise People*

By Professor Danny Dorling

Photograph: Frantzesco Kangaris

I grew up in Oxford, but left my hometown to study and then worked at universities in Newcastle, Bristol, Leeds and Sheffield. People who read my words, but didn’t hear my accent often assumed I was from the north. But now I’ve come full circle, and have taken up a chair in geography at Oxford University.

It is geography that reveals just how divided we have become as a society in this country. There are places from which it appears almost impossible to succeed educationally and others where it seems very hard to fail. On any given day, a fifth of children in Britain qualify for free school meals. Just one in 100 of those children get to go to either Oxford or Cambridge University. Four private schools and one highly selective state sixth-form college send more children to Oxbridge than do 2,000 other secondary schools. The most prestigious 100 schools secure 30% of all Oxbridge places. And 84 of them are private schools.

People often complain that the national debate on higher education is unfairly dominated by interest in entry to these two universities. But it matters. The richest 1% (people with a pre-tax household income of at least £160,000) dominate decision-making in this country. How they behave is a weathervane for social mobility in Britain.

Income inequality has now reached a new maximum and, for the first time in a century, even those just below the richest 1% are beginning to suffer, to see their disposable income drop. When you exclude the top 1%, income inequality within the rest of the population, within the 99%, is now lower than at any time since Margaret Thatcher was prime minister. Or, as put in economist-speak by the Institute for Fiscal Studies last year:

“Over the past two decades … inequality among the bottom 99% has fallen: the Gini coefficient for the bottom 99% was 5% lower in 2011–12, at 0.30, than in 1991.”

We now know that economic inequality changes how we think and is linked to biases in self-perception. When university students from 16 countries around the globe were asked to rate how they individually compared to other students in terms of the big five personality traits (agreeableness, conscientiousness, extroversion, open-mindedness and emotionality) it was those in the more economically unequal countries, such as the US, who were most likely to frequently say that they were superior to their peers. Fortunately, perhaps, the UK was not included in that particular study. When it is, we may find that we are not as self-deprecating when tested in private as we are in public.

Being more prone to be elitist and trumpet our own talents, both actual and imagined, is not necessarily unwise in a more unequal society. In such a society, to prosper may well require individuals to be more upbeat about their individual abilities, to think they are better than others. How else do you justify your position if you are paid much more than the average in a very inequitable society?

However, the tendency to self-aggrandisement has many downsides. As acclaimed author, academic and working-class child Marshall Berman said of his student days:

“The experience of studying at Columbia, Oxford and Harvard was intellectually exciting but socially lonely. They all catered to the rich, to the current and wannabe ruling class, and I felt I didn’t fit in.” When clever upstarts get into the ranks of the super-paid they often find they do not fit in easily there, just as highly paid women often also discover.

Today in education the thinking and attitudes of a few of our elite have come to be presented as common sense. Some of the members of the 1% like to portray state schools as the problem, and they suggest that those schools are the reason why others are paid so little and why incomes have dropped. To be able to do this they sometimes suggest that there was once a golden age of state schooling when the grammar schools gave working-class children a chance. Some may believe this was true, but grammar schools were a relic of an older, even more unequal age. Some of the new top 1% would prefer to see the privatisation of all schools.

It is almost 20 years since Milton Friedman explained to the Washington Post how state education could be privatised in the US. He said:

“I believe that the only way to make a major improvement in our educational system is through privatisation … Vouchers are not an end in themselves; they are a means to make a transition from a government to a market system.”

Now in the UK we have vouchers, in the form of the pupil premium, that follow poorer children to whichever school they attend. We have academies that are “managed by trusts, companies limited by guarantee”, as my old comprehensive school in Oxford is now tagged. We are currently travelling on Friedman’s road map. Geographical comparisons show that it is not a good route to take.

Stefan Collini, professor of English literature and intellectual history at the University of Cambridge, when commenting on the latest international education statistics last year, explained that “countries committed to high-quality comprehensives, such as Finland, yet again come out on top. A stratified and class-segregated school system is not the answer: it’s the problem.” There is way too much hierarchy and stratification among UK schools. Across the European mainland, children are far more used to almost all going to local state schools. That may be because almost every other European country is more economically equal than the UK.

The UK’s education system is beginning to look more like that of the US than other countries in Europe. Many American private universities now spend just a sixth of their fee income on teaching. These private providers take more than a fifth of fees in profit and spend even more on marketing to cover up the poor quality of what they are offering – subprime degrees not worth the paper they are printed on being sold to very young, very gullible consumers.

Since 2010-11 in Britain the new fully private universities have had access to taxpayers’ monies and can make a profit. Pundits now talk of “the subprime student loan” because often what is being bought through borrowing is not worth the initial fee, let alone the interest on that fee. Yet not all privatisation in education is on an upward trend.

For four of the last five years the numbers of children enrolled in fee-paying schools in the UK have fallen to just over 500,000. Part of the reason for the fall is that the average annual private school fee is now £14,000, and one of the reasons it is so high is because the numbers are dropping. Average annual fees for boarding schools are £27,612 – but almost £29,000 for boarding sixth-formers. The number of pupils in those schools dropped by 1.4% recently, to 66,605. At the most elite boarding schools, once the price of school trips is factored in, costs can be £50,000 a year, per child.

At exactly the same time that fewer children at or near the top of British society are able to aspire to what the children of the top 1% can afford, millions of children at the bottom of the 99% are falling into poverty or seeing their poverty deepen. In 2013 the Children’s Commissioner explained what is happening in the UK due to the nature of cuts and austerity:

“Families with children will lose more of their income than families without children. However, lone parents will lose the most out of everyone.” Within the 99% there is still rising inequality for the children.

Social mobility is lowest where local “choice” in education superficially appears to be highest. Another study last year named Trafford in Greater Manchester as having the highest level of educational social segregation. This is due to secondary moderns and grammar schools being retained there as well as private school provision being high. When confronted with the evidence that government education policy was reducing social mobility in such areas, a spokesman for the education department said it did not wish to comment on the report.

For schooling, the country to which utopians look is Finland, where 99.2% of school education is state-funded. In Finland, there is no inspection of teachers, no league tables; pupils are not set or streamed, and, as Diane Reay, professor of education at Cambridge, explains:

“In four international surveys, all since 2000, Finnish comprehensive school students have scored above students in all the other participating countries in science and problem-solving skills, and came either first or second in reading and mathematics. These results were achieved despite the amount of homework assigned in Finnish schools being relatively low, and an absence of private tuition.”

We have an educational system that is designed to polarise people, one that creates an elite who can easily come to have little respect for the majority of the population, who think that they should earn extraordinarily more than everyone else, and defines the jobs of others as so low-skilled that it apparently justifies many living in relative poverty.

The elite is shrinking. It really is now only 1% of the population who are maintaining their very high standard of living. The majority of graduates, even from a university like Oxford, cannot expect to fit within that 1% even if they all wished to only do the kinds of jobs that pay so much. The majority of all our young people should expect to see their standard of living fall in future, or they need to learn how to better control the richest people in our society. The 1% are disproportionately made up not of people who are most able, but of those who are most greedy and least concerned about the rights, feelings and welfare of other people.

Recently released findings from psychology suggest that many of them may be naturally inclined to be more selfish. It is not so much their fault that they find it hard to understand others’ feelings. It is our fault for not controlling the greed of a few and for so long swallowing their shallow arguments as to why they deserve so much.

Source*

Related Topics:

Growing List of British Academics Condemn Education Policies*

A Silent Education Revolution in Brazil*

Bertrand Russell on the Manipulation of Society*

New York Teachers withdrew Support for the Cabal’s Common Core Agenda

Seven Children Removed from Parents for Being Homeschooled*

British Private Schools Facing Child Sex Abuse Claims*

French Muslims Join the protest against the Deceptive Gender Equality School Campaign*

French Muslims Join the  protest against the Deceptive Gender Equality School Campaign*


Tens of thousands of supporters of the conservative “Manif pour Tous” movement gathered in Paris on Sunday to protest against gender equality teaching in schools and fertility treatment for same-sex couples.

Sunday’s march included a prominent Muslim contribution in a protest movement, originally opposed to gay marriage legislation that was passed in 2013, that has so far been overwhelmingly linked to far-right political parties and to conservative Catholic groups.

The “Manif Pour Tous” (MPT) mounted huge protests before legislation was passed in 2013 allowing gay marriages. Its focus now is on a family law, due to be debated later in the spring, which would allow for medically-assisted procreation (MAP) and IVF treatment for same-sex couples.

Many protesters also told FRANCE 24 they were worried about the state’s role in sex education, and the supposed “gender theory” lurking behind an “ABCD of equality” initiative aimed at breaking down gender stereotypes in schools.

The demonstrators claim the move is a deliberate attempt to brainwash children from an early age against what they consider the “natural” differences between men and women, boys and girls.

“The state has no business lecturing children on subjects as private as sexual identity or of imposing adult preoccupations on young children,” said MPT leader Ludivine de la Rochère, voicing a concern shared by many of the Muslim associations that joined Sunday’s march through central Paris.

Among the heads of the various groups was Samir Driss, of the Muslims for Childhood group.

He told FRANCE 24 that increasing numbers of Muslims were joining the MPT movement, despite its Christian and far-right reputation, attracted to its traditional and conservative view of family life.

“Education should be about teaching children skills so that they can get jobs,” he said. “Sex education is not going to get them into work. Sexuality is a subject that I will raise in front of my children when I see fit. I don’t want my children to go to school to learn about touching each other.”

‘I cannot accept it’

His words were echoed by Camel Bechikh, who heads the ‘Sons of France’ association of patriotic French Muslims.

“The state is responsible for practical instruction of children in schools, not their moral education, which is the business of the family,” he told FRANCE 24. “When I take my children to school I expect them to be taught history and geography. I don’t want them to be told the state’s idea of what is morally right or wrong. That is my job as their father and head of the family.”


At the very front of the march, which was dominated by middle class ethnically French demonstrators, Najib Guarraz was among a group holding a huge banner bearing the words, in French and in Arabic: “French Muslims opposed to same-sex marriage.”

The 54-year-old father of two told FRANCE 24 he was protesting because the government was “screwing with children’s heads”.

“I am opposed to gender theory lessons in schools, I am opposed to same-sex marriage,” he said. “We are in the process of destroying the fundamentals of French life.

“Gender theory will screw up our children. They are telling them that ‘maybe you are a boy but you also have a bit of girl in you, and it’s up to you to choose your sex.

“It’s not on. Adults are screwing with children’s heads and teachers are being trained to poison their minds. I cannot accept it.”

Sunday’s protest comes a week after several thousand people marched through Paris in a violent “Day of Anger” against the policies of President François Hollande’s Socialist government, including last year’s law allowing gay marriage.

Source*

Related Topics:

California Schools Prepare for Transgender Anti-Discrimination Law Changes*

Hollywood Pedophilia on the Line: Corey Feldman Speaks Out*

How Feminism Destroys Society*

A Child’s Personal Sovereignty… Stolen!*

‘Third Gender’ Official in Germany from November