Archive | April 23, 2014

Canadian Aborted Babies Used to Facilitate Electricity*

Canadian Aborted Babies Used to Facilitate Electricity*

 This is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to barbarism a, then paedophilia, Mk-Ultra and its offshoots and what witnesses at the trial of Popes Benedict Francis and, Paul have testified to trumps it all…

The Covanta Marion waste-to-energy facility in Oregon that incinerates British Columbia “medical waste,” including aborted babies.

 

By Peter Baklinski

The British Columbia Health Ministry has admitted that the remains of babies destroyed by abortion in B.C. facilities are ending up in a waste-to-power facility in the United States, providing electricity for residents of Oregon.

The province’s Health Ministry said in an email to the B.C. Catholic that “biomedical waste” shipped to the U.S. to be incinerated includes “human tissue, such as surgically removed cancerous tissue, amputated limbs, and foetal tissue.”

“The ministry understands that some is transferred to Oregon. There it is incinerated in a waste-to-energy plant,” the email stated.

The ministry said that contractors handling the province’s “biomedical waste” follow “health and safety protocols, as well as federal, provincial, and local regulations.”

Kristan Mitchell, executive director of the Oregon Refuse and Recycling Association, told the B.C. Catholic that the “biomedical waste” likely ends up at the Covanta Marion waste-to-energy facility in Oregon since it is the only facility that uses waste to power the grid. The facility confirmed that it still receives and incinerates B.C. medical waste.

The power facility, located in Brookes just off the I-5, burns waste in two massive boilers at a temperature of about 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit. The heat transfers into water tubes, which creates steam to drive turbines. The turbines generate electricity.

A 2007 article about the Marion waste-to-energy facility that appeared in the Willamette Live — ironically titled “Burn, Baby, Burn” — stated that at the time the incinerator burned about 800 tons (1,764,000 pounds) of medical waste per year.

“Medical waste is brought to the facility in sealed boxes and is carried to the furnace on a conveyor belt which layers it with the rest of the solid waste being processed,” the article states.

Locals at the time protested the “importation and burning of medical waste,” expressing concern about breathing “toxic emissions.”

The news comes one month after the remains of more than 15,000 aborted babies were found to have been incinerated, along with other “medical waste,” to heat and generate power for British hospitals.

Source*

Related Topics:

Catholic Hospital that Carries out Abortions

Jesuit Pope Charged with Trafficking Orphans*

The Sunshine State Ripping off the Homeless*

The Sunshine State Ripping off the Homeless*

By Scott Keyes

 

A backpack. Spare clothes. A notebook. Some keepsake photos. Crackers.

Though they may not have a home in which to secure their stuff, homeless people still have possessions like everyone else.

Yet the city of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida is on the cusp of passing a new regulation that would make it illegal for anyone to store their personal things on public property. Specifically, it would empower police to confiscate any personal possessions stored on public property, provided they have given the homeless person 24-hours notice. If the homeless people wish to retrieve their items, they must pay the city

“reasonable charges for storage and removal of the items,”

… though that fee is waived if the person is able to demonstrate he or she cannot afford to pay. The city may dispose of any possessions not retrieved within 30 days. One of the driving factors behind the measure, according to the legislation, is the city’s “interest in aesthetics.”

Last week, the City Commission gave unanimous preliminary approval to the measure, despite overwhelming opposition from local residents who testified.

One woman, Gazol Tajalli, told Commissioners that is

“…insanity that we are even here discussing whether an individual can put on the ground the few objects that they own.”

Another citizen, Rev. Gail Tapscott of the Unitarian Universalist Church of Ft. Lauderdale, criticized some of the Commissioners for “demoniz[ing]” the homeless.

Maria Foscarinis, Executive Director of the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty, chastised Ft. Lauderdale’s approach.

“Maintaining city streets is a legitimate concern, but simply punishing homeless people for leaving their possessions in public places is not an effective or humane way to address it,” she told ThinkProgress.

“Instead, city and business leaders should work with advocates and homeless people to develop alternative short and long term solutions, such as public storage options for homeless people and affordable housing.”

According to the Sun Sentinel,

“The commission’s actions were backed by business leaders who said they were looking for some controls on a situation that scares away customers and makes visitors uncomfortable.”

The commission is also considering other initiatives targeting the homeless, including stiffer penalties for urinating or defecating in public, prohibitions on panhandling at intersections or sleeping in public, and restrictions on charity groups that hand out food to the homeless.

Ft. Lauderdale is not the only city to embrace new ordinances that criminalize people for being homeless. Scores of cities, including Columbia, Palo Alto, Miami, Raleigh, Tampa, Harrisburg, and others have enacted measures that render homeless people simply trying to survive as criminals. Other cities, like Davis, California, are taking a different approach: constructing public lockers where homeless people can safely store their possessions.

Source*

Related Topics:

The Disappearing Act of the Homeless

Student Ignores the Illegality of Feeding the Hungry and Saves 200,000 Meals*

Burgeoning Proof that Obama Lied about the Death of bin Laden*

Burgeoning Proof that Obama Lied about the Death of bin Laden*

By Sean Brown

A report released by a long-time critic of the President claims that Obama may have lied about the raid that occurred in Pakistan that killed Osama bin Laden. The report uses evidence she compiled that came from the government itself and is rather convincing.

Pamela Barnett is the author of the report and she was also a plaintiff in several cases against Obama regarding his eligibility to run for president, and that’s what she claims the lies were based around.

She points specifically to an email that she received from a Freedom of Information Act request that was dated on April, 29 2011, which was a full two days before the announcement that the world’s most wanted terrorist had been killed in a raid the same day.

Media Complicit In Obama Birth Certificate Cover-up

The email carried the subject “Burial,” and the commander of Strike Group One, Samuel Perez, asked “Do I need any special religious/ceremonial preparations?”

However Barnett points out that when Obama made the announcement that bin Laden had been killed on May 1, 2011 he said “today,” twice.

She accused the President of lying to the American people and the world about the date in which bin Laden was killed, then said

“According to a live speech … given to the country late night on May 1, 2011, Obama stated, ‘Today at my direction the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound … in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a fire fight they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.’”

According to Barnett, the

“emails in my possession received directly from the Department of Defense as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request for Osama bin Laden’s killing and burial related documents, reveal that the mission to allegedly ‘kill Osama’ occurred April 28, 2011, or earlier, not May 1, 2011, as Obama claimed.”

Her theory as to why Obama would have lied about the date in which bin Laden was killed is similar to the thoughts many Americans have, that the timing of certain events seems to be impeccable for him to distract attention away from anything that makes him look bad.

Dissenting Supreme Court Judges Say Obama Birth Certificate a Fake

She says in the report

“So why did Obama lie about the date that Osama was killed? Was it timed to further control the media by giving them a new, sexier story than a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals hearing the next morning in Pasadena, Calif., that confirmed that Obama’s real, unforged constitutional credentials had/have NEVER been vetted by any court or anyone in any state or federal government agency?”

She also noted that prior to the announcement of bin Laden’s killing, the major media networks were slated to cover Obama’s eligibility case, which was something that neither he nor anybody in his administration wanted.

“Obama and his operatives saw this coming and wanted to further keep the American people and media in the dark regarding his ineligibility, forged documents, and use of a Connecticut Social Security number never assigned to him,” Barnett said in her report.

Her assertions aren’t too far off either. Breitbart News also speculated about the emails in an article that featured Catherine Herridge from Fox News who said the emails about bin Laden’s burial three days prior to the raid “raises an interesting question over whether the administration’s statement that it was first and foremost a capture mission was accurate.”

In addition to her email evidence Barnett points out that his burial was only witnessed by a few select members of the military even though there were thousands of people aboard the ship, and the military only ever released a vague account of his burial without any pictures.

In all, Barnett makes a compelling case for why Obama would have lied about the date in which bin Laden was actually killed. She feels that the circumstances surrounding the mission and the lack of information available on the matter show that Obama and those around him, “including high members of the military, are willing to go to any lengths to put Obama in a good light.”

So is it possible that Obama lied about the raid in order to draw attention away from his eligibility case?

Source*

Related Topics:

Bin Laden: The Gift of Dying Twice!

BBC Was Told That’s Not bin Laden!”

Why the U.S. won’t get the Hell out of Afghanistan*

Sworn Testimony from Ex-CIA Pilot No Planes Hit the Twin Towers

Lockerbie Lies to Subvert Independent Sovereign Countries *