Archive | July 14, 2014

Another Law Passed to Prevent Any Paedophile Connection to British Royalty*

Another Law Passed to Prevent Any Paedophile Connection to British Royalty*

By Robert Verkaik

Letters, emails and documents relating to the monarch, her heir and the second in line to the throne will no longer be disclosed even if they are in the public interest.

Sweeping changes to the Freedom of Information Act will reverse advances which had briefly shone a light on the royal finances – including an attempt by the Queen to use a state poverty fund to heat Buckingham Palace – and which had threatened to force the disclosure of the Prince of Wales’s prolific correspondence with ministers.

Lobbying and correspondence from junior staff working for the Royal Household and Prince Charles will now be held back from disclosure. Buckingham Palace confirmed that it had consulted with the Coalition Government over the change in the law. The Government buried the plan for “added protection” for the Royal Family in the small print of plans called “opening up public bodies to public scrutiny”.

Maurice Frankel, head of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, said that since the change referred to communications written on behalf of the Queen and Prince Charles it might be possible for “park keepers working in the royal parks” to be spared public scrutiny of their letters written to local authorities.

The decision to push through the changes also raises questions about the sincerity of the Liberal Democrats’ commitment to government transparency. In opposition, senior Liberal Democrats frequently lined up to champion the Freedom of Information Act after it came into force in 2005.

Ian Davidson, a former member of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC), told The Independent:

“I’m astonished that the Government should find time to seek to cover up royal finances. When I was on the PAC what we wanted was more disclosure not less.

“Every time we examined royal finances we found extravagance and indulgence as well as abuse of expenses by junior royals.

“Everywhere we looked, there were savings to be made for the Government. This sends the wrong message about public disclosure and accountability.”

Paul Flynn, another member of the committee, described the special protection for the Royals as “indefensible”. He said:

“I don’t think it serves the interests of the public or the Royal Family very well.”

Mr Frankel said he believed that Prince Charles was the driving force behind the new law.

“The heir to the throne has written letters to government departments in an attempt to influence policy,” he said.

“He clearly does not want these to get into the public domain.”

Later this month, lawyers for the Cabinet Office backed by Prince Charles, will go to court to continue to resist Freedom of Information requests of ministers to publish letters written to them by the Prince of Wales.

A spokesman for Buckingham Palace said that the change to the law was necessary because the Freedom of Information Act had failed to protect the constitutional position of the monarch and the heir to the throne. He explained that the sovereign has the right and duty to be consulted, to encourage and warn the government, and by extension, the heir to the throne had the constitutional right and duty to prepare himself for the role of King.

“This constitutional position relies on confidentiality, so that all such correspondence remains confidential,” he said.

But he said that change would also mean that correspondence not covered by the absolute exemption would be made public 10 years earlier than under the current disclosure rules.

The Palace’s position was backed by Professor Vernon Bogdanor, research professor at King’s College London.

He told The Independent:

“The essence of constitutional monarchy is that the Queen and other members of the Royal Family remain politically neutral. The Queen meets the Prime Minister once a week, when both are in London, to discuss government policy.

“The heir to the throne has the right, and perhaps the duty, to question ministers on policy so as to prepare himself for the throne. Such discussions are only possible if they remain confidential. Otherwise the neutrality of the Queen and of the Prince of Wales could be undermined.

“When the Queen meets the Prime Minister, no one else is present – not even the Queen’s Private Secretary. For this reason, it is right that the Royal Family should be exempt from FOI.”

The Government claimed that the thrust of the changes announced yesterday would make it “easier for people to use FOI to find and use information about the public bodies they rely on and their taxes pay for”.

The Ministry of Justice intends to increase the number of organisations to which FOI requests can be made, bringing in bodies such as the Association of Chief Police Officers, the Financial Services Ombudsman, and the higher education admissions body UCAS, and also all companies wholly owned by any number of public authorities.

In the public interest? The stories they didn’t want us to know

*In 2004 the Queen asked ministers for a poverty handout to help heat her palaces but was rebuffed because they feared it would be a public relations disaster. Royal aides were told that the £60m worth of energy-saving grants were aimed at families on low incomes and if the money was given to Buckingham Palace instead of housing associations or hospitals it could lead to “adverse publicity” for the Queen and the government.

*A “financial memorandum” formalising the relationship between the sovereign and ministers set out tough terms on how the Queen can spend the £38.2m handed over by Parliament each year to pay for her staff and occupied palaces.

*The Queen requested more public money to pay for the upkeep of her crumbling palaces while allowing minor royals and courtiers to live in rent-free accommodation.

*As early as 2004 Sir Alan Reid, the Keeper of the Privy Purse, had unsuccessfully put the case to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport for a substantial increase in the £15m-a-year grant to maintain royal buildings.

*The Palace planned to go ahead with refurbishing and renting the apartment of Diana, Princess of Wales at Kensington Palace after it had lain empty since her death in 1997.

*A letter exchange revealed a tussle over who has control of £2.5m gained from the sale of Kensington Palace land. Ministers said it belonged to the state, while Buckingham Palace said it belonged to the Queen.

Source*

Related Topics:

NWO: ‘Annoying’ Behaviour Now Under Police Control in the U.K. *

British Family Courts Why the Secrecy?

Paedophilia: Enough Evidence against the Queen of England and Her Prime Minister*

Adviser to Queen and Founder of Paedophile Support Group*

Prince Charles Accused of Bullying so He Could Mine Under Villager’s Homes*

British Royals Cash in on Hard-up Families*

Saudi: Prince Charles Seals What Cameron Could Not*

British Governance: When You Fear the People…*

Guardsman Incarcerated for Thought Crime*

British MP Describes Pressure to not Expose Pedophiles in Parliament*

U.K. Fingerprinted over a Million Pupils in Schools without Parental Consent*

Bertrand Russell on the Manipulation of Society*

Sex attacks on under-11s rise by 14 per cent in one year

****Up Nature: Sex change for Nine-year-olds*

Jesuit Pope Charged with Trafficking Orphans*

Is Pope Francis about to Resign?*

UN’s Heterophobic Agenda*

NWO Next Step in Making the State Warden of Your Child*

350,800 Missing Children Found in Mass Graves in Ireland, Spain, Canada*

A 1970’s Victim of Paedophile Network Speaks Out!

The Rebirth of Paganism

Advertisements

France Celebs Campaign against EU-US TAFTA*

France Celebs Campaign against EU-US TAFTA*

The NWO trade deals seem to go by different names, but with the same result, natural resources, patenting everything possible, and the profits end up undermining sovereignty, and the unelected global governors-cum banksters- global elite own everything including us…

One hundred French celebrities have launched a campaign against the upcoming TAFTA deal between the US and Europe. The protesters say the new treaty will lower economic standards and bring a large influx of GMO products from the US.

The petition dubbed: “Everyone against TAFTA” started on June 10 and has gathered over 5,500 signatures so far. Launched by well-known performers, writers and political leaders in France, the petition says that “the citizens of Europe are against the transatlantic treaty.”

A Transatlantic Free Trade Area (TAFTA), also known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), is a proposed free trade agreement between the European Union and the United States.

Negotiations on TAFTA are held in week-long cycles alternating between the EU and the US. The sides hope to conclude their work in 2014 or 2015.

The leaked text of the proposed treaty, revealed in March 2014, proposes creating

“a better climate for the development of trade and investment.”

It also allows free movement of business managers for temporary work purposes in the countries that sign the agreement.

“These opaque negotiations are happening behind our back and the backs of Europeans and North Americans,” says the petition,

“under the cover of a hypothetical re-launch of economic growth, and these negotiations are likely to lower our social, economic, health, cultural and environmental standards.”

“It’s the reason we are calling on French and European members of parliament to put pressure on EU members and the European Commission to disrupt the negotiations,” said the petition, which carried the slogans:

“No TAFTA zone”

“Stop TAFTA“ and

“ No to transatlantic treaty.”

Among the signatories was Yannick Jadot, a member of the European parliament and Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Minister of Vocational Education in France.

Comedian Christophe Alevêque, who was the first to sign the petition, told French Le Parisien that the problem is that

“humanity, the environment, culture and social protections are second to the all mighty market.”

“It’s these same merchants to whom we’ve given the keys to the house. Now we’re adding a few more keys to their ring. We have nothing left. There must be a firewall, a little bit of control, to make sure humans are a bit more at the center of our concerns.”

Proponents say the agreement would result in multilateral economic growth. They say the deal would lead to some $100 billion per year in growth on both sides and will generate millions of new jobs.

However, critics say the agreement is not flawless as it may look like it would increase corporate power and make it more difficult for governments to regulate markets for public benefit. Also with the majority of TTIP negotiations being held in secrecy, it’s unclear to what extent the EU’s preferences have been met.

TAFTA opponents also claim that the treaty will bring a big influx of genetically modified foods from the US, like hormone-treated beef and genetically modified corn.

EU fear of GM food from US hampers historic trade deal

According to GeneWatch UK director, Helen Wallace, Monsanto and other GM companies were “desperate to push their GM crops into other countries before the devastating impacts on wildlife and farming destroy existing markets,” reported local publication Farmers Weekly.

Source*

Related Topics:

France: Mass Protests Lead to Ban on GM Corn*

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Advises Reject the NWO’s TPPA*

U. S. And Japan TPP Talks Fail Again*

TPP: Controlling the Worlds Food Supply*

Rothschild’s Summit Fine-tuning Capitalism into Global Economic Tyranny*

New Wikileaks Confirm Global Corporate Tyranny*

“Is This The Truth About Tax’s”

Tyranny of Taxation and Regulation without Representation*

Amazon out to Control what we Read!*

U.K. Will Start Growing GM Crops Next Year*

Rothschild, Morgan and Stanley in Bitter Takeover Battle for Giant US Copper Mine*

The Biden Dynasty Makes Its Mark in the Ukraine*

Recolonizing Africa: Consolidating African Oil Assets*

The Return of Feudalism

A Bilateral Free Trade Agreement with U.S. a Slow Death*

Your Citizenship and Personal Sovereignty*

The Maastricht Proclamation: Replacing Papal Authority and Corporatism, with a new Common Law Covenant*

Nestle ‘Liberating’ Water from Drought Stricken Indian Reservation*

Nestle ‘Liberating’ Water from Drought Stricken Indian Reservation*

As the U.S. drought raises alarm over water security, it has become illegal for residents to collect rainwater, but not for Nestle to exacerbate the problem further for profit…

By Ian James

Among the windmills and creosote bushes of San Gorgonio Pass, a nondescript beige building stands flanked by water tanks. A sign at the entrance displays the logo of Arrowhead 100% Mountain Spring Water, with water flowing from a snowy mountain. Semi-trucks rumble in and out through the gates, carrying load after load of bottled water.

The plant, located on the Morongo Band of Mission Indians’ reservation, has been drawing water from wells alongside a spring in Millard Canyon for more than a decade. But as California’s drought deepens, some people in the area question how much water the plant is bottling and whether it’s right to sell water for profit in a desert region where springs are rare and underground aquifers have been declining.

“Why is it possible to take water from a drought area, bottle it and sell it?” asked Linda Ivey, a Palm Desert real estate appraiser who said she wonders about the plant’s use of water every time she drives past it on Interstate 10.

“It’s hard to know how much is being taken,” Ivey said. “We’ve got to protect what little water supply we have.”

Over the years, the Morongo tribe has clashed with one local water district over the bottling operation, and has tried to fend off a long-running attempt by state officials to revoke a license for a portion of the water rights. Those disputes, however, don’t seem to have put a dent in an operation that brings the Morongo undisclosed amounts of income through an agreement with the largest bottled water company in the United States.

The plant is operated by Nestle Waters North America Inc., which leases the property from the tribe and uses it to package Arrowhead spring water as well as purified water sold under the brand Nestle Pure Life.

The Desert Sun has repeatedly asked the company for a tour of the bottling plant since last year, but those requests have not been granted. The company and the Morongo tribe also did not respond to requests for information about the amounts of water bottled each year.

Until 2009, Nestle Waters submitted annual reports to a group of local water districts showing how much groundwater was being extracted from the spring in Millard Canyon. Reports compiled by the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency show that the amounts drawn from two wells in the canyon varied from a high of 1,366 acre-feet in 2002 to a low of 595 acre-feet in 2005. In 2009, Nestle Waters reported 757 acre-feet pumped from the wells during the previous year.

Since then, neither the company nor the tribe has submitted those annual forms, and a rounded estimate of 750 acre-feet a year has been listed in the water agency’s reports — 244 million gallons a year.

None of the figures have been independently verified, and it’s also uncertain how much water the bottling plant could be drawing from other local sources.

Separate reports filed by the Morongo tribe with the state show that during 2013, 598 acre-feet of groundwater was pumped in Millard Canyon, and 3 acre-feet of water was diverted. Those amounts translate to about 200 million gallons a year — enough water for about 400 typical homes in the Coachella Valley.

As a sovereign nation, the Morongo Indians are exempt from oversight by local water agencies and don’t face the same reporting requirements as other entities. They have kept confidential information that would typically be disclosed elsewhere, such as data on groundwater pumping and water levels in most of the reservation’s wells. Without that information, it’s difficult for outside observers to assess the bottling plant’s impacts on water supplies.

Several years ago, water researcher Peter Gleick was allowed to visit Millard Canyon and described seeing wells that pump water from the same aquifer that feeds the spring. He also saw a small stream flowing among cottonwood trees.

To what extent the spring may still be flowing isn’t clear because the tribe controls access to that area at the base of the San Bernardino Mountains. But drawing water out of the canyon means less water flowing in the stream and seeping downhill to recharge aquifers — and that is a personal concern for Gleick, who enjoys exploring desert oases in Southern California.

“Surface water is so rare and the biological communities around these oases are so unique that these kinds of bottling plants in the desert should give us pause,” said Gleick, who is president of the Pacific Institute in Oakland. “If they weren’t pumping, the volume that they’re taking out would be going into either recharging groundwater or providing some surface flows.”

In his 2010 book “Bottled and Sold,” Gleick described the inner workings of the Cabazon plant, which covers an area larger than seven football fields, saying it was producing more than 1 billion bottles of Arrowhead spring water a year. Labels on the bottles list several sources of water, including the spring in Millard Canyon and other springs elsewhere in Southern California.

“The reason this particular plant is of special concern is precisely because water is so scarce in the basin,” Gleick said. “If you had the same bottling plant in a water-rich area, then the amount of water bottled and diverted would be a small fraction of the total water available. But this is a desert ecosystem. Surface water in the desert is exceedingly rare and has a much higher environmental value than the same amount of water somewhere else.”

When Gleick visited the canyon, he noticed the vegetation seemed to have died back around the oasis because the stream’s flow had dwindled. He said there ought to be an assessment of how the shrinking flows are affecting the ecosystem. As far as he knows, no such assessment has been carried out.

Michael Fisher, a spokesman for the Morongo, responded to questions about the bottling plant with an emailed statement.

“The Morongo Band of Mission Indians is a sovereign nation with a long history of caring for the environment and of environmental stewardship as it relates to air quality, local habitats and tribal water resources,” Fisher said.

“Morongo’s successful partnership with Nestle Waters North America provides over 250 local jobs through the operation of a sustainable water-bottling plant that provides water for human consumption only. As responsible stewards of the environment, Morongo works carefully with Nestle to monitor the plant operations and conduct recharge and other environmental programs to ensure that these water resources remain healthy and reliable for future generations.”

Tapping a spring

Starting in the late 1800s, Cabazon was used as a stop on the Southern Pacific railroad line. It was an attractive spot in part because of the water, which seeped down from the San Bernardino Mountains as groundwater and gushed out in Millard Canyon. The railroad used a ditch to direct the stream down to the trains, and the water was used to fill the boilers of steam locomotives.

The spring, which is surrounded by the Morongo reservation, has long been known as the SP Spring after Southern Pacific, even after the water stopped being used for trains.

The Cabazon Water District for years tapped the spring in Millard Canyon to provide part of the local drinking water supply. The water flowed through an easement granted to the water district by the tribe.

Then, in the early 2000s, the Cabazon Water District agreed to sell those water rights to the tribe for $3 million. That sale enabled the small water district to reduce its rates sharply. In return, the Morongo obtained expanded access to a spring that has been estimated to flow at a rate of up to 3,000 gallons per minute.

Within months, the tribe announced a deal with the Perrier Group of America, owned by Nestle, to produce Arrowhead water. The terms of that 25-year deal weren’t disclosed, but the company said it was spending $26 million to build the plant on leased land and would pay a fee to the tribe for every gallon drawn from the ground.

The partnership was launched at a gathering of tribal officials in January 2002, joined by an audience of more than 200 people and then-Congresswoman Mary Bono.

The Arrowhead plant is one of many across the country that have been built to meet growing demand for bottled water. The U.S. bottled water market has grown from 6.2 billion gallons and $8.5 billion in revenues in 2003 to more than 10 billion gallons and $12.2 billion in revenues in 2013, according to statistics released by the New York-based Beverage Marketing Corporation. The market for bottled water dipped during the economic downturn in 2008-09, but has grown steadily again since 2010.

Nestle Waters North America, a subsidiary of Swiss-based Nestle that is headquartered in Stamford, Conn., says on its website that it has 29 bottled water facilities in the United States and Canada, with annual revenues totaling $4 billion in 2012.

Some of that revenue flows from the Cabazon plant, which is one of the largest of its kind in the nation. The factory is powered in part by two wind turbines that tower above the desert next to the I-10 freeway, with an Arrowhead logo topping one of them among the spinning blades.

Nestle Waters said in an emailed statement that its Cabazon facility

“operates in strict accordance with all federal and state public health regulations, pursuant to our agreement with the Morongo Band of Mission Indians.”

“We proudly conduct our business in an environmentally responsible manner that focuses on water and energy conservation,” the company said. Our sustainable operations are specifically designed and managed to prevent adverse impacts to local area groundwater resources, particularly in light of California’s drought conditions over the past three years.”

The company didn’t respond to a request for groundwater data from wells that are used to monitor water levels.

The plant takes in water through an underground pipe, which water district officials say is about 8 inches in diameter and carries water three miles downhill from the spring in Millard Canyon, passing underneath the freeway.

Much of the water in the area begins on the slopes of the San Bernardino Mountains, where it collects in canyons and flows down through oases, seeping into desert aquifers. Rain runoff and snowmelt also collect in the San Gorgonio River, which flows through the pass during wet periods.

San Gorgonio Pass is crisscrossed by earthquake fault lines. There are 11 separate groundwater basins in the area bounded by those faults, which appear to act as barriers, largely holding back water except when aquifers swell during wet periods and spill over into neighboring basins, said Jeff Davis, general manager of the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency.

If water weren’t being pumped and diverted from Millard Canyon for the bottling plant, that water would boost groundwater levels in the canyon and would gradually spread downhill into the Cabazon basin, Davis said, likening the aquifers to “separate bathtubs.” The next aquifer downhill is the Coachella Valley aquifer, on the other side of a similar geological barrier.

“In a wet period, the Cabazon basin is basically going to fill up and it’s going to flow over that underground weir,” Davis said. “The water that overflows is going to end up in the Coachella basin.”

Cabazon’s aquifer, however, has been far from overflowing in recent years. The Cabazon Water District says the aquifer is in decline, with more water being pumped out than is flowing back in.

Measurements of water levels in wells, some of which are recorded in a U.S. Geological Survey database, show significant drops in groundwater levels during the past decade. Water levels in some wells in the Cabazon area have been sinking between 1 foot and 4 feet a year during the past several years.

In one well directly downhill from Millard Canyon, the water level receded from an average of 674 feet below ground in 1999 to an average of 720 feet below ground in 2008, a large drop of 46 feet, before an obstruction in the well prevented workers from taking more measurements.

Allen Christensen, a hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said the declines in groundwater levels are mainly related to years of drought.

“Historically, there have been very large swings in the Cabazon basin directly related to climate swings, wet periods and dry periods,” Christensen said. He pointed to long-term records for one Cabazon well, which show water levels falling to a low during dry years in the ’60s and ’70s, then spiking upward during wet years in the ’80s. Since 2000, the well’s levels have again been dropping.

The amount of water that comes out of Millard Canyon, Christensen said, is relatively small when considered alongside various other canyons and the San Gorgonio River. For that reason, he said, the bottling plant’s impact on the area’s water supplies is probably relatively small.

Davis agreed, pointing out that his agency in 2012 recorded a total of 32,000 acre-feet of groundwater pumped in its entire area, from Calimesa to Cabazon. Compared to that, the estimated 750 acre-feet of water drawn from Millard Canyon represents roughly 2 percent. A single golf course can use more water.

“It’s literally peanuts. It’s a drop in the ocean,” Davis said. “You’re talking about such a small amount of water that it’s kind of ridiculous to fight over that. But people will fight over water no matter what.”

Squabbling and calculating

The state has since 2003 sought to revoke the Morongo Band of Mission Indians’ license for a right to use about 115 acre-feet of water per year from Millard Canyon, one of three such licenses under the tribe’s ownership. State officials maintain the agricultural water right had lapsed and had been forfeited because it wasn’t used for many years.

The tribe attempted to challenge the proceedings by raising procedural objections, and the case eventually went before the California Supreme Court. The court’s ruling favored the state in 2009, and the hearing process resumed. The parties now await a decision by the State Water Resources Control Board.

“It’s a small water right, so I don’t think the revocation of this water right has severe implications for that water bottling facility. But I do think it has implications for upholding the rules,” said Samantha Olson, a senior staff counsel for the State Water Resources Control Board.

“It seemed unfair to every other water user in the basin to be able to pick up an antiquated water right and use it,” Olson said. “You should stand in line just like anybody else and apply for that water. If you’re reactivating a water right that’s long since been forfeited, you’re basically stepping in front of the line.”

The Coachella Valley Water District initially backed those concerns in 2003, arguing that spring water from Millard Canyon is part of the Whitewater River system and that it would otherwise naturally flow into the aquifer in the Coachella Valley. CVWD attorney Gerald Shoaf said at the time that “every drop they bottle and export is a drop that is diverted from the Coachella Valley aquifer.”

As the case dragged on, though, the CVWD board eventually decided to set aside its opposition to the bottling operation. The reason, Shoaf said recently, was that the water district wanted the ability to negotiate with the Morongo if necessary for permission to run a water pipeline across the reservation.

“We’ve agreed to suspend that, to withdraw our challenge and to not play a role,” Shoaf said. “The decision by this board at that time was, it was better to hold that in abeyance and possibly use it as a negotiating point to get permission to run the pipeline across the reservation, hopefully at reduced cost. So that’s where it stands.”

The Coachella Valley’s water agencies have explored the possibility of building a pipeline to connect with the State Water Project, which now delivers water as close as Cherry Valley, and have decided against it for the time being due to high costs. But CVWD officials say they could reconsider if the state follows through with a plan to build water tunnels beneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, which they hope would increase water deliveries. For now, CVWD and the Desert Water Agency trade their allotted deliveries of State Water Project water for equivalent amounts from the Colorado River.

“Unless and until the pipeline project is resurrected, it’s just in limbo,” Shoaf said. “I don’t think we would want to take the chance of joining with the state board in going after the tribe and the bottling plant at this point when there’s still a possibility we’re going to want a favor from them in terms of the right-of-way to get the pipeline across the reservation. It’s not worth throwing away that opportunity to gain a few hundred acre-feet a year.”

Jim Barrett, CVWD’s general manager, said the water agency first intends to see how the Delta plan plays out before approaching Morongo leaders.

“Then if it makes sense to build a pipeline, we’ll engage with the Morongos,” Barrett said. “But that’s probably 10 years away.”

Bottling plant generating debate

When the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians sued the Coachella Valley’s two largest water agencies last year and accused them of mismanaging the water supply, some of the agencies’ managers asked whether the tribe’s motives could include selling bottled water. Jeff Grubbe, the tribe’s chairman, denied having any such plans. But that exchange illustrated how the bottling plant on the Morongo reservation has stirred suspicions and generated debate.

Some residents say selling the area’s water isn’t in the community’s best interest and seems especially unjustified during one of the worst droughts in California’s modern history.

Others argue the Nestle plant benefits the community. Riverside County Supervisor Marion Ashley pointed to the jobs it provides and noted that some of the bottled water is sold locally.

“That’s the highest, best use of water is drinking it,” Ashley said. “They overlie that water and they have superior rights to it, and they probably have superior rights to anybody downstream.”

Water agencies in Cabazon as well as the Coachella Valley have acknowledged the Morongo water rights while also calling for the tribe to release more information about how much water it is using.

“They’re entitled to use the groundwater basin, too. Everyone is. But it’s just a shame that this water is not being used locally. It’s being exported,” said David Luker, general manager of the Desert Water Agency. He said DWA’s position has been that the Morongo tribe should have to report its water use just like other entities.

“I don’t believe there’s any way to force them to fork over groundwater pumping information unless there’s discovery in a lawsuit,” Luker said. But he said the level of concern about the bottling plant in the area doesn’t seem to have grown to a degree that leads to such action.

Other concerns are raised by people who live in a neighborhood of mobile homes near the bottling factory. Some say they wish the plant would provide more jobs because many are unemployed. Others say despite living next to the Arrowhead plant, their local water service is poor, with sputtering faucets and frequent breaks in water lines.

“Who knows how much water they’re pumping out of there and taking,” said Jesse Wallis, who does construction jobs and said he wishes there were more work opportunities at the plant.

“We hear them honking there every night, pulling trucks in and pulling them out,” Wallis said. “We don’t hear nothing from them, just the trucks.”

For years, the Cabazon Water District supplied millions of gallons of water to the Nestle Waters plant. The company informed the agency that the water was for internal uses such as sinks, toilets and cleaning the factory. But in 2010, that water supply agreement broke down.

Calvin Louie, the Cabazon Water District’s general manager, said he tried unsuccessfully to convince the Arrowhead plant managers to follow through on pledges made verbally years earlier, including offers of paying for road improvements and a new water line running down a nearby street to support development.

The water district, Louie said, also wanted a formal agreement in which the company would agree not to export any of the water supplied. “And that’s when we couldn’t come to an agreement.”

When the negotiations failed, the Cabazon Water District’s board decided to cut off water service to the bottling plant. The board at the time saw it as a moral decision, Louie said, because they didn’t want the community’s water being bottled and shipped elsewhere.

The water district took a financial hit when it lost the roughly $120,000 a year that the bottling plant was paying in water bills. The small agency, which supplies water to the community of about 2,500 people, was forced to raise its rates to cover the loss.

Nestle turned to the Morongo tribe for water service, using a new well near the plant.

Louie said that the tribe and Nestle aren’t required to report their groundwater pumping to the water district, but that ultimately sharing information on water use would help efforts to manage the declining aquifer. He said the water district’s relationship with the tribe has improved in recent years.

Unlike other areas nearby, Cabazon’s aquifer has not been adjudicated by a court. In Beaumont, in contrast, there is a court-appointed entity that oversees groundwater pumping and ensures that water use doesn’t exceed a “safe yield.” The relative lack of controls in Cabazon, Louie said, makes it something of a “wild, wild west of water.”

Louie, a cowboy hat-wearing former police officer who turned to water management as a second career, said some of the water district’s officials have spoken with the Morongo tribe recently about a need for more dialogue to stem the depletion of the Cabazon aquifer.

Two of the water district’s five board members were elected last year with campaigns that included blaming predecessors for selling water rights and saying the bottling plant has been detrimental to groundwater levels. One of their campaign signs was posted beside the train tracks at the time, reading: “Our water rights were sold. Our profits squandered. Arrowhead was built, lowering our water table. What’s next?”

Asked his view about the bottling plant, Louie said he sees both pluses and minuses.

“Arrowhead provides a lot of jobs, and that helps the economy. On the other hand, Arrowhead has a reputation of going into small communities and taking advantage — and basically, pump them dry and ‘good to the last drop,’” Louie said.

He cited the example of McCloud, a small town near Mount Shasta, where Nestle scrapped plans to build a water bottling plant in 2009 after facing strong opposition. While fighting plans for that plant, one community leader from McCloud called Louie to ask about the history of Nestle’s operation in Cabazon.

Any water bottling business, Louie said, can prompt worries about depleting local water supplies. And he pointed out there are many other privately owned wells drawing on water supplies – from the Morongo Casino, Resort & Spa to the Robertson’s Ready Mix plant.

“Everybody affects the aquifer, the water level, but who’s to blame? Well, you know, when you don’t have the data and when you have no groundwater management, it’s a shot in the dark. But everybody needs to be responsible,” Louie said. “We need to limit the amount of water we pull because Mother Nature is not replenishing it right now.”

Louie said that he hopes a lawsuit won’t be necessary to achieve a better balance, and that all of the parties drawing water from private wells seem open to having a dialogue about Cabazon’s water issues.

“I’d like to see everybody come to the table and let’s just lay out our cards and let’s just see what’s best for the region, because I think everybody benefits,” Louie said, explaining that he hopes to see the tribe and others with private wells report how much water they are pumping — as well as how much they could cut back in response to the drought.

“I think now is the time, not a month after we find out that we’re completely depleted. Now is the time to start talking.”

Source*

Related Topics:

The Hopi Call for Water Rights

The Privatization of Water*

Nestlé’s Selling You Your Water!

Fear and Dejected Riddled Chocolate Brought to you By the Company that Believes Water is not a Human Right!

No Water for 45,000 Palestinians*

Another Bedouin Community Razed to the Ground, Leave Children without Water in High Temperatures*

Ethiopia: Harvesting Clean Water from the Air*

Creating 1,000 Liters of Drinking Water from Air!*

The Sacred Spirit of Water*

Coca-Cola Forced to Shut Bottling Plant in India*