Archive | October 5, 2014

Palestine Demands Israeli Withdrawal by 2016*

Palestine Demands Israeli Withdrawal by 2016*

For those who have lost sight of the history of it all, simply the Israeli state paid set up by the Rothschilds occupies Palestinian land hence the label the Palestinian Occupied Territoriesthe only trouble is, Europe will do everything to keep the Israeli state because they do not want the zionists back in Europe! Besides, Israel is doing a good job turning the region against it’s self.

By Juan Cole

AP reports that Palestine is presenting a resolution to the United Nations Security Council calling for a complete Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, by 2016.  Palestine will argue that Israel has systematically and over decades violated all the international laws regulating military occupations, and that it is quickly marching toward being an Apartheid state (Apartheid is itself a form of crime against humanity).

The UN Security Council has five permanent and ten rotating members, but each of the five permanent members can exercise a veto.  The United States, despite prevaricating statements attempting to represent itself as an honest broker, has almost always vetoed any UNSC resolution criticizing Israeli actions, even though these actions clearly violate the Hague Regulations on Occupied Territories, the Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute and other bodies of international law.

So the likelihood is that the US will veto the resolution of Mahmoud Abbas.  Though who knows, maybe a lame duck Barack Obama will finally show some spine and simply abstain instead of vetoing.  The UNSC can put economic sanctions on Israel if it is defied (just as it has sanctioned Iran and North Korea, two other egregious violators of international human rights norms.)

If the US does veto the resolution, then Washington is clearly saying that it is all right with American elites if Israel goes on stealing Palestinian land on a vast scale and expropriating and oppressing the stateless Palestinians under its boot.

In that case, Palestinian circles are suggesting that Mahmoud Abbas will have no choice but finally to go to the International Criminal Court to charge Israel with crimes against humanity (i.e. systematic war crimes).  This step is serious, since the US cannot block the ICC and any judgment it delivered against Israel would be taken seriously in the European Union and many other countries.

I wrote last spring:

Palestine president Mahmoud Abbas …  signed a some 15 international treaties and UN legal instruments, including the Geneva Conventions, in preparation for going to the International Criminal Court over Israel’s illegal flooding of hundreds of thousands of Israeli squatters into the West Bank.  These squatters have for the most part never paid Palestinians for the land on which they build their homes.  They completely exclude Palestinians from their colonies on Palestinian land.  Often they prevent Palestinian farmers from harvesting their crops near the settlements.  They commit vandalism against Palestinian property and sometimes just shoot down Palestinian civilians.  Over time, they aim to make an Palestinian state impossible by turning it prospective territory into Swiss cheese…

. . . the Palestinians signed the UN instruments and treaties that would strengthen their hand when and if they take their case to the International Criminal Court.  They are also joining more UN agencies and committees, something both Israel and the US have opposed, since they don’t want Palestine recognized as a state by the international community before Israel itself can set the terms for such a state.

The ICC was established by the 2002 Rome Statute, so that previous generations of Palestinians would not have been able to resort to it.  Even then, it could only take up cases of member nations, and since Israel had not signed the treaty and Palestine was not a member state, the ICC could not consider the case of Palestine until recently.  Another way a non-member state can be taken to the ICC is if the UN Security Council forwards a case to it.  But the US screws over the Palestinians by consistently vetoing any UNSC ruling against Israel.

When the United Nations General Assembly voted in 2012 to admit Palestine as a non-member UN observer state’]) United Nations General Assembly voted in 2012 to admit Palestine as a non-member UN observer state (the same status as the Vatican enjoys), however, it opened the door for Palestine to take Israel’s squatting policy to the ICC.  Palestine as an observer state can sign the Rome Statute and can initiate a case against Israel.  Previous to 2012, Palestinians had no standing before the court since they were not recognized as a state at all.

The Palestinian leadership is said to have unanimously backed Abbas in taking this step.

Abbas said,

“We do not want to use this right against anyone, and do not want a confrontation with America.  For we have an excellent relationship with it.”  He praised Secretary of State John Kerry for his energetic diplomacy on the issue.

“We just could find no other path forward.”  Given Israeli footdragging on the prisoner release, Abbas said, he was going to join UN organizations and agencies.  He had agreed to put that off for 9 months, but that period has come to a close.

Palestine has gained nothing from the negotiations, since Israel has increased the size of the settlements and announced thousands of new housing units on Palestinian land since August when they began.  In essence, Israel has been grabbing up the very territory over which the negotiations are being held– sort of like if you’re talking with friend how to share a piece of cake when suddenly he starts eating it up.


Related Topics:

The Root Cause of the Never-Ending Conflict in Palestine; and How to Fix It*

Deir Yassin, the Beginning of the Palestinian Holocaust. 1948*

The Butcher of Khuza’a*

Would Jewry Exist today if it Were not Muslims*

Not in our Name: 225 Jewish Survivors of Nazi Genocide Condemn Israel*

The Khazars and Zionists are One: The Re-invasion of the Ukraine*

Israel Changes Bar Code To Avoid Boycott*

Mother Ashkenazi, Father Muslim – Dahlia Wasfi Argues Against Illegal Occupation

Former Israeli Soldier Echoes the ISIS-Zionist Threat*

Palestinians Call to end Israeli Occupation*

Israelis want Netanyahu to Leave*

Mayans Expel Jews from Guatemala Village*

Now we Know Why ISIS/L is Destroying Iraq and not Defending Palestine*

A Freudian Slip!? U.N. Reveals Close Links Between Israel and Al Qaeda Affiliates in Syria*

Get Out of Jail Free Card for Cop Involved in 100+ Tortures of Black Men*

Get Out of Jail Free Card for Cop Involved in 100+ Tortures of Black Men*

By Kim Bellware

An ex-police commander who oversaw the torture of more than 100 black men in Chicago police custody walked out of federal prison Thursday, after serving just three and a half years of his sentence.

Jon Burge left the minimum-security prison in North Carolina to report to a halfway house in Florida until his sentence officially runs out in February of 2015, the Chicago Tribune reports.

After the 66-year-old was convicted in 2011 of perjury and obstruction of justice for lying about police torture, several members of the Chicago City Council called for a reparations fund of $20 million — roughly the amount Burge and his “midnight crew” of detectives have cost Chicago taxpayers over the years in legal defense fees and settlements alone. Aldermen renewed those calls on Thursday, saying it’s time for the city to “make amends.”

Anthony Holmes was one of the victims Burge personally tortured — with methods including electric shock — into giving a confession to a murder he says he didn’t commit. Holmes, who is now pushing 70, spent 30 years behind bars as a result and has yet to see any compensation because the statute of limitations on the torture has run out.

“At least he’s got a pension,” Holmes said of Burge, according to DNAinfo Chicago. “We came out of there with nothing.”

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan tried to strip Burge of his $4,000-a-month police pension, but couldn’t overrule a police pension board vote.

As Burge prepares to start his life again as a free man, In These Times took a look at how much the disgraced commander has cost taxpayers through the years:


Related Topics:

Kill A Black Teen And Make Six Figures Soon After

Mass Incarceration: Behind the Ferguson Uprising*

Sentenced: Bribed to Send Black Kids to Jail*

KKK raising Funds for Officer Who Shot Brown in Ferguson*

Deputy Police Chief Identified as KKK by the FBI*

Police Brutality: Protestors Shut Down Times Square*

Chart of Deaths from Police Shooting*

When the Police Come Knocking at your Door…

Pro-Israelis Finance U.S. Police Training*

The Black Stereotype: Socially Engineered in the FBI War on Tupac Shakur and Real Black Leaders*

Big Banks Guilty of Charging Higher Rates to African Americans and Hispanics*

A Rotten Smell Emanating from the Ebola Scare*

A Rotten Smell Emanating from the Ebola Scare*

By F. William Engdahl

For a Nobel Peace Prize President, Barack Obama seems destined to go down in history books as the President who presided over one of the most aggressive series of wars ever waged by a bellicose Washington Administration. Not even George Bush and Dick Cheney came close.

First, before the ink was even dry on his Nobel Prize certificate, Obama announced the Afghanistan “surge”, pouring another 30,000 US military into that destroyed part of the world. Then came Obama’s war against Libya’s Qaddafi, followed rapidly by his war to try to topple Syria’s Bashar al Assad. Soon after came Obama’s “war for democracy in Ukraine,” otherwise better called Obama’s attempt to provoke Russia into a new war confrontation with NATO by backing a gaggle of Ukrainian oligarchs, criminals and outright neo-nazis in Kiev. In July of this year, Obama’s Administration was pushing the President to launch a second try at bombing Syria back to the Stone Age, allegedly to destroy ISIS, a looney Jihadist Sunni sect that was said to be a joint venture of the CIA and Israeli intelligence.

Now Obama’s advisers, no doubt led by the blood-thirsty National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, have come up with a new war. This is the War Against Ebola.

On September 16, President Obama solemnly declared the war. He announced, to the surprise of most sane citizens, that he had ordered 3,000 American troops, the so-called “boots on the ground” that the Pentagon refuses to agree to in Syria, to wage a war against….a virus?

In a carefully stage-managed appearance at the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC), Obama read a bone-chilling speech. He called the alleged Ebola outbreaks in West Africa, “a global threat, and it demands a truly global response. This is an epidemic that is not just a threat to regional security. It’s a potential threat to global security, if these countries break down, if their economies break down, if people panic,” Obama continued, conjuring images that would have made Andromeda Strain novelist Michael Chrichton drool with envy. Obama added, “That has profound effects on all of us, even if we are not directly contracting the disease. This outbreak is already spiraling out of control.”

With that hair-raising introduction, the President of the world’s greatest Superpower announced his response. In his role as Commander-in-Chief of the United States of America announced he has ordered 3,000 US troops to West Africa in what he called, “the largest international response in the history of the CDC.” He didn’t make clear if their job would be to shoot the virus wherever it reared its ugly head, or to shoot any poor hapless African suspected of having Ebola. Little does it matter that the US military doesn’t have anywhere near 3,000 troops with the slightest training in public health.
Before we all panic and line up to receive the millions of doses of untested and reportedly highly dangerous “Ebola vaccines” the major drug-makers are preparing to dump on the market, some peculiarities of this Ebola outbreak in Africa are worth noting.

Certified Ebola Deaths?

The World Health Organization, under the Director, Dr Margaret Chan, in a press conference on September 13, sounded the alarm, warning that Ebola in West Africa was surging out of control.

“In the three hardest hit countries, Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, the number of new patients is moving far faster than the capacity to manage them,” Chan claimed.

WHO claims that almost half of 301 health-care workers dealing with alleged Ebola patients have themselves died, and that 2,400 people out of 4,784 cases in Africa have died of Ebola.

On August 8, Chan declared the African Ebola situation a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern,” whatever that is supposed to mean.

A major problem for Chan and her backers, however, is that her Ebola statistics are very, very dubious. For those whose memory is short, this is the same Dr Margaret Chan at WHO in Geneva who was guilty in 2009 of trying to panic the world into taking unproven vaccines for “Swine Flu” influenza, by declaring a Global Pandemic with statistics calling every case of symptoms that of the common cold to be “Swine Flu,” whether it was runny nose, coughing, sneezing, sore throat. That changed WHO definition of Swine Flu allowed the statistics of the disease to be declared Pandemic. It was an utter fraud, a criminal fraud Chan carried out, wittingly or unwittingly (she could be simply stupid but evidence suggests otherwise), on behalf of the major US and EU pharmaceutical cartel.

In a recent Washington Post article it was admitted that 69% of all the Ebola cases in Liberia registered by WHO have not been laboratory confirmed through blood tests. Liberia is the epicentre of the Ebola alarm in West Africa. More than half of the alleged Ebola deaths, 1,224, and nearly half of all cases, 2,046, have been in Liberia says WHO. And the US FDA diagnostic test used for the lab confirmation of Ebola is so flawed that the FDA has prohibited anyone from claiming they are safe or effective. That means, a significant proportion of the remaining 31 % of the Ebola cases lab confirmed through blood tests could be false cases.

In short, no one knows what 1,224 Liberians in recent weeks have died from. But WHO claims it to be Ebola. Note that the countries affected by the Ebola alarm are among the poorest and most war-torn regions in the world. Wars over blood diamonds and colonial genocidal tribal wars have left a devastated, mal-nourished population in its wake.
WHO’s official fact sheet on Ebola, which now they renamed EVD for Ebola Virus Disease, claims,

“The first EVD outbreaks occurred in remote villages in Central Africa, near tropical rainforests, but the most recent outbreak in West Africa has involved major urban as well as rural areas…”

WHO further notes that, “It is thought that fruit bats of the Pteropodidae family are natural Ebola virus hosts. Ebola is introduced into the human population through close contact with the blood, secretions, organs or other bodily fluids of infected animals such as chimpanzees, gorillas, fruit bats, monkeys, forest antelope and porcupines found ill or dead or in the rainforest.”

Then the official WHO Ebola Fact Sheet dated September, 2014, states,

“It can be difficult to distinguish EVD from other infectious diseases such as malaria, typhoid fever and meningitis.”

Excuse me, Dr Margaret Chan, can you say that slowly? It can be difficult to distinguish EVD from other infectious diseases such as malaria, typhoid fever and meningitis? And you admit that 69% of the declared cases have never been adequately tested? And you state that the Ebola symptoms include “sudden onset of fever fatigue, muscle pain, headache and sore throat. This is followed by vomiting, diarrhea, rash, symptoms of impaired kidney and liver function, and in some cases, both internal and external bleeding”?

In short it is all the most vague and unsubstantiated basis that lies behind President Obama’s new War on Ebola.

War on Ebola or War for Oil?
One striking aspect of this new concern of the US President for the situation in Liberia and other west African states where alleged surges of Ebola are being claimed is the presence of oil, huge volumes of untapped oil.
The offshore coast of Liberia and east African ‘Ebola zones’ conveniently map with the presence of vast untapped oil and gas resources shown here

The issue of oil in West Africa, notably in the waters of the Gulf of Guinea have become increasingly strategic both to China who is roaming the world in search of future secure oil import sources, and the United States, whose oil geo-politics was summed up in a quip by then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in the 1970’s: ‘If you control the oil, you control entire nations.’

The Obama Administration and Pentagon policy has continued that of George W. Bush who in 2008 created the US military Africa Command or AFRICOM, to battle the rapidly-growing Chinese economic presence in Africa’s potential oil-rich countries. West Africa is a rapidly-emerging oil treasure, barely tapped to date. A US Department of Energy study projected that African oil production would rise 91 percent between 2002 and 2025, much from the region of the present Ebola alarm.

Chinese oil companies are all over Africa and increasingly active in West Africa, especially Angola, Sudan and Guinea, the later in the epicentre of Obama’s new War on Ebola troop deployment.

If the US President were genuine about his concern to contain a public health emergency, he could look at the example of that US-declared pariah Caribbean nation, Cuba. Reuters reports that the Cuban government, a small financially distressed, economically sanctioned island nation of 11 million people, with a national budget of $50 billion, Gross Domestic Product of 121 billion and per capita GDP of just over $10,000, is dispatching 165 medical personnel to Africa to regions where there are Ebola outbreaks. Washington sends 3,000 combat troops. Something smells very rotten around the entire Ebola scare.


Related Topics:

Further Proof Bill Gates is Linked to Ebola*

What Does Ebola, Gas and Oil Have in Common?*

“Tracking Ebola contacts”: call in the Surveillance State

More CDC Lies: Ebola Outbreak*

Propaganda, Ebola and Strange Clues

Ebola Casualties Reduced Down to One in Nigeria with the Help of Naturopathic Treatment*

ZMapp Fairs No Better than the Nigerian Treatment of Ebola*

TPP, TPPA Goes EPA in the Recolonization of Africa*

One World: Anti-war Protests Gaining Momentum*

One World: Anti-war Protests Gaining Momentum*

Hundreds of protestors marched in London on Saturday, voicing their opposition to the UK’s joining in air strikes against ISIL in Iraq.

Protestors marched on Downing Street and gathered outside the Temple tube station in the British capital.

Despite the heavy rain, many people took part in the nearly 5-hour-long rally organized by the “Stop the War” Coalition.

During the march protesters shouted: “We don’t want another war,” “Stop the killing stop the hate.” Many carried banners and placards declaring: “Don’t bomb Iraq, don’t attack Syria”.

When a group of protestors arrived at Number 10 Downing Street, a minute of silence was taken for British aid worker Alan Henning, killed by ISIL militants and for those killed in the region by coalition bombing.

British Labour Party politician and MP for Islington North Jeremy Corbyn told Anadolu Agency (AA) that he voted against the bombing of Iraq when Westminister was voting for military strikes and said, “I voted against not because I support in anyway ISIL. I do believe that Western interventions make the situation worse. The bombing will create more support for ISIL, not less. What I want to see is a peace in the region. I think ISIL is not a great threat to UK. I think the bigger threat to the UK is our continuing involvement in wars all around the world.”

Parliament voted the Iraq air strikes on September 26, with a large majority of 524 MPs voting for the military action, and only 43 voting against them.

The UK has launched various strikes against ISIL in Iraq since the measure was voted.


Related Topics:

ISIL Struggling to Recruit Local Fighters*

Senior Commander of ISIS is a ‘retired’ US General Paul Vallely*

Blind Obsession = $22 Billion to Fight ISIS Minus $8.7 Billion in Food Stamps*

NATO Airstrikes Target Grain Silos not ISIS*

Israel Tried by Film Maker Ken Loach, Rock MusicianRoger Waters and Michael Mansfield QC*

ISIL Camp near Syria Border Destroyed by Iraqi Army not U.S.*

U.S. Bombing Iraqi Army*

U.S. Excludes Syria When Syria has Made Great Strides against ISIL*

A Freudian Slip!? U.N. Reveals Close Links Between Israel and Al Qaeda Affiliates in Syria*

The Last Four U.S. Presidents on What to Do with Iraq*

NATO Inflaming Civil War and More Sends Arms to Kiev*

Now we Know Why ISIS/L is Destroying Iraq and not Defending Palestine*

U.S., Britain and Israel are the Biggest Terrorists on the Planet.

How Self-Aware Are You?

How Self-Aware Are You?

By Randi G. Fine

Only Allah Knows what tomorrow will bring, but today is yours in the makingIf you were asked the question, “Who are you,” how would you respond? Would you state your name and occupation, describe your physical characteristics, and talk about the roles you play, or would you describe the true essence of your being? How you answer that question depends on your level of self-awareness.

Self-awareness is the method by which we recognize ourselves as individuals who are distinctly separate from other individuals and our surrounding environment. It is the introspective ability we each have to recognize our attitudes, needs, values, opinions, tendencies, reactions, thoughts, emotions, and aptitudes.

To be self-aware we must be able to look well beyond the roles we play, the things we do, and our physical attributes. These aspects of ourselves are certainly important and necessary, but in relation to all we are and all we can become, they play a very small role.

It is through self-awareness that we examine our pre-existing conditions, distinguishing those that are self-fulfilling from those that are self-limiting. We must be willing to challenge old beliefs and release the emotions that are attached to them.

Beginning in childhood we are given messages, sometimes subtle sometimes not, that we integrate into our thought processes. We are told what we are capable of doing and what we are not. These messages become part of our belief systems. Our belief systems define who we think we are.

As adults it is our responsibility to re-examine our pre-existing beliefs and identify the ones that are self-defeating, the ones that deprive us of our personal power. We never have to be stuck with our current thought processes or circumstances. Life is meant to be lived deliberately. That is why there are endless options to choose from.

As I look back over the years I see that much of my suffering could have been prevented by having keener self-awareness. My lack of self-awareness made me vulnerable to manipulation. Schemers marked me as someone they could easily take advantage of. Accidents happened because my mind was elsewhere. Predators observed my every move while I remained oblivious. I blindly believed in people whose only interest was benefiting themselves.

I do not blame myself for what happened or for my lack of awareness because I honestly did not know any better. Once I knew better I did better. We can only change what we understand; whether or not we choose to use the knowledge to better ourselves is entirely up to us.

Everyone suffers. No one goes through life unscathed. Ask anyone what they have gone through in life and be prepared to listen to at least three potentially victimizing life experiences, with little deliberation. The older one gets the more pain he will have lived through. We all suffer adversity, mishaps, tragedy. We all experience discouragement, stumbling blocks, frustration. But we do not all dwell on these things and we do not all becomes victims of life.

Have you ever heard someone say, “That’s just the way I am,” as an excuse to not take responsibility for the way he lives his life? What he might as well say is, “I am not willing to improve who I am,” because that is a more truthful statement. If that is one’s choice he is entitled to it as long as he assumes responsibility for his stance. Some of us want to progress ourselves through introspection, some of us do not.

Whether or not someone wants to delve into the many facets of his or her individuality comes down to personal choice. One does not have to have an introspective nature to have happiness, success, or a full life. Many people live fulfilling lives without ever discovering who they truly are. It is all relative to the life experience one desires. In fact, few of us achieve total self-awareness or are self-aware one-hundred percent of the time.

Self-awareness is an ongoing process of reflection. It is a process of discovery, individual to each of us, that is achieved through the honest exploration of the self. It is a fairly simple process that occurs over time. The payoff is tremendous; it can profoundly transform our lives.

The process that brings us to self-awareness is a domino effect. The first step is making the choice to know ourselves. That awakens us to becoming more self-aware. As we become more self-aware we gain a fuller understanding of our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Through that understanding we are prepared to make the best choices for ourselves. We arrive at these choices based on what we learn from past experiences, how we consciously live in our present reality, and how open we are to all the possibilities our futures hold.

The better the results of our choices, the more we become aware of the power we hold over our lives. The knowledge that we have control over our lives leads us to greater self-awareness. The more aware we are of ourselves and desires, the more positive changes we can make in our lives.

Living is not about focusing on what we are doing wrong. It is about improving what we are doing right and finding new ways to expand the experiences of our personal journeys.

Self-awareness requires courage; the hardest person we will ever have to face is the one reflected back to us in the mirror. Whether acknowledged or not, the fears we think lie dormant inside of us are actively being lived every moment of every day. They affect everything we do, think, and say. They hold back progress.

How wasteful it would be to spend an entire life living with fear and denial. What then is the point of living?

Our lives change when we open our eyes to self-awareness. Why not make the conscious choice to shove all obstacles aside, and then reach in and seize the prize that is there for the taking—your power of intent?

This article is an excerpt from Randi Fine’s book:
Awaken From Life: Lessons for Discovering Your Personal Truths


Related Topics:

Body Atlas of Human Emotions*

We are Naturally Masters of Many Trades*

Transition to a More Creative Life

Mindfulness Stops Negativity from Taking Over*

When You Stop Wishing Yourself Away…

Social sciences and the destruction of individuality

Invisible Chains

Your Creativity and Non-conformity a Threat to the NWO*

Biometric Identification Control: What Will You Do?

The Paths of Return

Staying Sane in a Suicidal Culture*

Transformation: Lessons from Rumi*

Personal Sovereignty, and the Power of the Sovereign Spirit*

Disclosure of Close Ties with Israel During Hajj Raises Saudi Concerns*

Disclosure of Close Ties with Israel During Hajj Raises Saudi Concerns*

Saudi Deputy Foreign Minister Abdulaziz bin Abdullah voiced concern about the disclosure of the close relations between Riyadh and Tel Aviv, especially when Muslims from across the world are in Saudi Arabia for Hajj rituals.

“After a meeting between Israeli Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, also a former foreign minister, with Saudi Prince Turki bin Faisal al-Saud in New York on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting late September, and given the decreasing influence of Riyadh in the region and among the Muslims, Abdulaziz bin Abdullah expressed dire concern about the disclosure of the close relations with Tel Aviv, especially when a large number of Muslims have gathered in the holy cities of Mecca and Medina for Hajj rituals,” an informed source told FNA.

According to the report, in a secret meeting between a close advisor to Abdulaziz bin Abdullah and Saudi Interior Minister Nayef bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud, the two sides discussed the serious challenges facing Saudi Arabia in the near future.

“At the start of the meeting, the representative of Abdulaziz bin Abdullah elaborated on the meetings between certain high-ranking Saudi officials, specially Turki bin Faisal, and Zionist officials, mostly held in Aqaba port, in which Riyadh undertook some commitments,” the source who called for anonymity due to security concerns, said.

The source quoted Nayef bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud as saying that the most important subjects raised during the meeting between the Saudi and Israeli officials included

  1. Strengthening cooperation between Saudi Arabia and Israel in defeating the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad
  2. All-out cooperation to prevent a nuclear deal between Iran and the West in a way that Tehran’s relations with the western states will be experience serious trouble and lead the nuclear talks to a failure
  3. Finding new ways to accelerate and facilitate economic, political and foreign policy relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia
  4. Given the existence of differences between Saudi Arabia and Qatar on the political, territorial, economic and regional issues, Israel undertook to support Riyadh’s stances and force Qatar to accept the preconditions of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the UAE for ending the existing conflicts, and
  5. During the meeting between Turki al-Faisal and Tzipi Livni in New York, Saudi Arabia has presented a dual-track approach to play with Iran which started with Turki al-Faisal’s meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in New York.

“During the meeting between the two Saudi officials in Riyadh, Abdulaziz’s representative told Nayef that the issues raised in the meetings with the Israeli officials were undoubtedly Riyadh’s most important goals but given the presence of Muslims in Saudi Arabia for Hajj rituals the relations between Riyadh and Tel Aviv should never be allowed to come under the spotlight, warning him that otherwise there will start a crisis which may lead to the overthrow of the Saudi dynasty,” the source told FNA.

The informed source revealed that at present, the Saudi princes, especially “Abdullah bin Abdulaziz, Saud a-Feisal and Turki al-Feisal have intense differences on may important issues”.


Related Topics:

Unholy Trinity United States-Israel- Saudi Arabia Sowing Discord amongst Muslims*

Saudi Prince Joins the Opposition

Saudi: Prince Charles Seals What Cameron Could Not*

Saudi Arabia Providing anti-Tank Missiles to Rebels in Syria*

DEBKA Report: Saudi, Egypt and Israel Orchestrated Palestinian Holocaust*

Saudi Admits to Collaborating with Syrian Armed Terrorists*

Wahhabism as a Tool of Colonialism*