Archive | October 11, 2014

Banksters Turning the Ukraine into the GMO Basket of Europe*

Banksters Turning the Ukraine into the GMO Basket of Europe*

By Christina Sarich

One of the conditions to the loan from International Monetary Fund (IMF) to Ukraine is allowing the cultivation of GMOs, which is common for IMF. What is going on?

If you are familiar with actor Peter Cullen’s diabolical laugh in the movie Predator, then you will be able to relate to the latest situation in the Ukraine, which can be summarily described as follows:

Corporations buy out American government.

  1. Political stooges, run by baking cartels and their overlords, along with biotech corporations engineer an undemocratic coup.
  2. The US-affiliated IMF lends the Ukraine government money to bail it out of a bankrupt economy that our political maneuvers helped to create.
  3. Corporations move in with salivating mouths, ready to take advantage of special provisions in the IMF loan – which include the Ukraine’s forced compliance into allowing the cultivation of GMOs. This is standard procedure for IMF loans, and almost always, the loans benefit US-based corporations.
  4. Another country is tucked into the notched belt of the once democratic United States, now run only by thieves and murderers.

Monsanto, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are all in this together. Oakland Institute released a report in July of this year entitled “Walking on the West Side: the World Bank and the IMF in the Ukraine Conflict,” revealing how the World Bank, and IMF, under the terms of their $17 billion loan to Ukraine, would open that country to genetically-modified (GM) crops and genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture, even though GMO crops are currently banned there.

In 2013, Viktor Yanukovych, who was then president of Ukraine, turned down an agreement with the European Union that was tied to a $17 billion International Monetary Fund loan, and those terms are just now being revealed – of course they included overturning the GMO ban in the Ukraine. Yanukovych instead chose an aid package from Russia, which amounted to $15 billion along with a discount on Russian gas, the same country that has completely banned GMOs and has even threatened steep fines for individuals or companies caught propagating them.

In a column for Inter Press Service, Mousseau wrote:

“Whereas Ukraine does not allow the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture, Article 404 of the EU agreement, which relates to agriculture, includes a clause that has generally gone unnoticed: both parties will cooperate to extend the use of biotechnologies.”

Furthermore, in a report for Al Jazeera, Mousseau and Marin Kirk wrote:

“There is no doubt that this provision meets the expectations of the agribusiness industry. As observed by Michael Cox, research director at the investment bank Piper Jaffray, “Ukraine and, to a wider extent, Eastern Europe, are among the most promising growth markets for farm-equipment giant Deere, as well as seed producers Monsanto and DuPont.”

As is usual with the chicanery of our corrupt government, they distract the world with one hideous move, like the possibility of WWIII, while they quietly commit other crimes – in this case the further takeover of the world food supply.

So why is Ukraine pivotal in this biotech/corporate government take-over? Hardly a word about this IMF ‘deal’ has been uttered in mainstream media. Why?

The Ukrainian soil is some of the finest high quality nutrient and rich soil in the world today. Under 70 years of Soviet rule, the agricultural landscape, ironically, is devoid of the pollutants of war, like heavy chemicals; i.e., industrial fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, and certainly of the types of poisons that have contaminated US soil, like glyphosate.

All the chemicals were diverted for military purposes during the Cold War. The ‘black soil’ of Ukraine is absolutely some of the finest soil on the Earth, perhaps equal only to unspoiled volcanic soil in other parts of the world.

The Ukraine has protected its agriculture lands as a national treasure, but now they are threatened by a Biotech coup d’état.

What’s more? Under Yatsenyuk – the man, handpicked by Victoria Nuland, the neoconservative former advisor to Dick Cheney is going to orchestrate the ‘new government’ in Ukraine – who of course, just like in the US Congress, will be full of idiots who support GMO companies.

Yatsenyuk is also a known patsy for the IMF (the International Monetary Fund).

So, the Big Banksters, the corrupt US government and biotech monopolizers like Monsanto will have their way again. This is a none-too-subtle form of colonialism at best and an all out war on the world if it is seen for its true execrableness. These jerks take over countries through war and then take over the food supply. They poison us and then offer poison as remedies, and plan B ensues – a new nation of slaves is readied for the trading blocks.

Interestingly, the BRICS countries wanted a stronger voting share when the IMF was created, but the US and Britain refused them. The colonizers of old are still the same old colonizers. Just as a side note – the World Bank is always headed by an American.

In conclusion, $17 billion is a pittance to buy off a country. Once Monsanto patents seeds grown in the Ukraine, they will make trillions, and again our food supply will be jeopardized. The ‘black gold’ that is Ukrainian soil will be spoiled, and there is no going back.


Related Topics:

The Real Purpose of the IMF*

US Role in Egypt, Ukraine, and Now Hong Kong Mass Protests*

Seeing to the NWO Agenda: Central Banker Becomes Ukraine’s Prime Minister*

U.S. has Already Spent Five Billion Dollars to Subvert Ukraine*

Corporate Global Governance Control of Ukraine*

The Biden Dynasty Makes Its Mark in the Ukraine*

Russian Oligarchs Expanding their Influence in Scot-Free Property*

Ukraine: Europe’s Israel*

The Khazars and Zionists are One: The Re-invasion of the Ukraine*

Open Letter from Former NSA Director and Veterans on NATO’s Ukraine Pretext for WWIII*

Ukraine’s Killing Fields*

Ukraine Government’s Crime against Humanity in Luhansk*

Second Humanitarian Aid for Ukraine Makes it through Russian Customs*

Free European Army in Defence of Ukraine against NATO and EU*

The Next Step in the Ebola Scare, Executive Order 13295*

The Next Step in the Ebola Scare, Executive Order 13295*

By Christina Sarich

July of this year, President Obama signed into law an amendment to the Executive Order 13295, which redefines who can be quarantined and why. This does not bode well for a nation that could potentially face an Ebola pandemic. It smacks of pre-meditated bio-warfare and martial law on a nation’s own citizens.

This means that any police officer or ‘health official’ can, without question, and on suspicion alone, quarantine someone simply for showing any sign of ‘respiratory illness.’ None other than the war-mongering Bush Administration, first put the order into place, originally meant to quarantine victims of SARS. Ebola just happened to be listed on the original executive order, too, signed by Bush. But now, with the exception of influenza, Americans can be detained for any health concern, including Ebola, even if it is not named as such.

When you add to this the fact that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) already has measures in place for dealing with an outbreak of a communicable disease which allows for the quarantine of “well persons” who “do not show symptoms” of the disease, then Americans need to pay some serious attention to what is happening to their civil rights.

Furthermore, under the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, public health authorities and governors would be given expanded police powers to seize control of communications devices, public and private property, as well as a host of other Orwellian measures in the event of a public health emergency.

There is only one infected person in Dallas for now, but 80 more are under surveillance by the CDC. What do you suppose our criminal government has planned for the other thousands of cities in the U.S.? The issue does not revolve around taking measures to prevent an outbreak in the nation; if done with the true, sincere intention of protection, then without infringing on civil rights, that would be OK. The issue is when power is exercised at a dictator level.

Emory University Hospital in Atlanta was set to receive a single patient infected with Ebola, but now there are said to be three.

Government officials have been saying that Ebola only spreads through bodily fluids, but it is also known to spread through tiny air particles.

I strongly encourage you to read The Survival Medicine Handbook, written By Dr. Alton and his wife, Nurse Amy Alton. The information will be invaluable in a situation where modern medicines are no longer available, and the government tries to quarantine an entire nation for whatever its plan may be. What’s more, be sure to educate yourself on ways to boost immunity and protect yourself from Ebola and other viruses.


Related Topics:

Nigerian Logistics and How they Beat Ebola*

Rockerfeller’s Flu Pandemic*

A Rotten Smell Emanating from the Ebola Scare*

“Tracking Ebola contacts”: call in the Surveillance State

More CDC Lies: Ebola Outbreak*

On Trial in Canada for Speaking against Zionist Crimes*

On Trial in Canada for Speaking against Zionist Crimes*

By Lasha Darkmoon

Canadian patriot and freedom fighter Arthur Topham is to be hauled before the Canadian courts next year on trumped-up charges. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Arthur is an innocent man. His trial date has now been set. He will appear in court on 26 October, 2015, and his trial will last for two weeks until 6 November.

If found guilty, this man who has said and done nothing that you and I have not said or done a thousand times, will be torn from the embrace of his wife, his family and his friends and be thrown into prison. It will be a major miscarriage of justice if this should occur.

The forthcoming trial of Arthur Topham (pictured) is therefore much more than the trial of one man. Canadian justice will itself be on trial.

What is Arthur’s alleged crime?

Arthur’s only crime is that he is a political dissident who has chosen to exercise his democratic right to free speech. He has spoken out eloquently about the war crimes of the state of Israel and published books on his website which are regarded as offensive to many Jews. To criticize this privileged ethnic group in Canada or to question its cherished assumptions, is, it seems, strictly taboo. This is classified as “hate speech”.

At no time has Arthur advocated breaking the law. He has never incited anyone to violence. He has merely utilized his pen to express his political views in a rational and civilized way as any political dissident anywhere in the world would do.

If Arthur had been an American or British citizen, he would not be facing a possible prison sentence right now, and this is because whatever Arthur has said or done is not regarded as a crime in the United States or Britain.

If Arthur is to be condemned in a Canadian court for “hate speech”, it will only be because Canada has now fallen under the dominant influence of a powerful ethnic group who have somehow managed to turn Canada into an Israelified police state.

Yesterday I received an email from an old friend of mine. His name is Felix Dean. He is a retired Canadian professional who dearly loves his country, just as Arthur Topham does. Unlike Arthur however, Felix can no longer bear to live in Canada. He feels that Canada has rapidly morphed into a police state under the malign influence of organized Jewry. So Felix now resides in self-imposed exile within “the civilized confines of Europe,” to quote his own words.

This is what Felix has to say about his Canadian compatriot Arthur Topham:

“To the best of my understanding, Arthur Topham’s cardinal sin is not what he said, but the fact that he PUBLISHED it. There is an individual by name of Richard Warman, the rabid Zionist attack dog whose only reason for living is to destroy truth tellers like Arthur. Warman is actually of German ancestry, not a Jew as far as I know, but he is a classical cult zombie, someone so thoroughly brainwashed and programmed for bloodshed that I cannot but regard him as little better than a Manchurian candidate of the worst sort.”

Strong words, friend Felix. It distresses me to know that Canadian justice is now apparently relying on the evidence of Manchurian candidates. Has it really come to this?

It would appear that this man Richard Warman (pictured), an ardent Zionist with a reputation for being a “serial complainant”, has a personal grudge against Arthur Topham and would like to see him go to prison.

Though non-Jewish himself and with no official position, Warman is constantly to be seen filing complaints against critics of Big Jewry. It was he who tried to get David Icke into trouble recently, accusing Icke of unspecified “hate crimes”. Apparently mentioning “Jews” in the same breath as “lizards” is deeply disturbing to Mr Warman and could indirectly lead to a second Holocaust.

Needless to say, Warman is relatively small fry: a pest and a nuisance rather than a serious threat to champions of free speech. Arthur’s main adversary is a powerful Canadian Jew, Harry Abrams, British Columbia representative of B’nai B’rith Canada. It was he who in 2007 registered a section 13 complaint against Arthur as follows:

“This concerns a complaint filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission seeking relief for discriminatory publication under prohibited grounds caught by Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham of Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada, and his internet publication known as contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

Cut out the legal jargon and it boils down to this: Arthur is a criminal because he has given offense to the Jews.

In 2012, Harry Abrams filed a second complaint against Arthur with the British Columbia “Hate Crimes” unit, alleging that:

“Roy Arthur TOPHAM, between the 28th day of April, 2011 and the 4th day of May, 2012, inclusive, at or near Quesnel, in the Province of British Columbia, did by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”

Impressive legal jargon reducible to the age-old whine: “This man is saying bad things about Jews and must be stopped!”

This is the charge Arthur is now fighting, and this is the question the Canadian courts must decide: is it permissible to contradict a Jew in any way, thereby hurting his feelings, and will you be sent to prison if he complains about you?

and a serious threat to free speech in Canada

A few more quotes from the email of my Canadian friend Felix will help to fill in the picture:

“Arthur had a brave and noble defender in his lawyer, Douglas Christie, who originally defended Ernst Zundel and other political dissidents. Christie unfortunately succumbed to liver cancer a few years ago, a true hero in every sense of the word.

Consider that all these guys are real Canadians, whose ancestors were the original pioneers and frontiersmen of our beloved country. These great Canadians earned combat medals, they fought and died in wars on behalf of Canada, and then what happens? These troublesome Jews show up and proceed to grind all our Canadian patriots to dust and ashes, as if they owned the world and all the surrounding planets.

No part of Canadian history holds any value for these alien interlopers. They respect none of our traditions. It is thoroughly disgusting.

You and I have said things that are hundreds of times more offensive to “the Jews” than Arthur Topham has, and yet no one is threatening to throw us in prison! So why do they pick on Arthur? It’s because Arthur has made a name for himself (through Christie) in the mainstream press. Ordinary Canadians know all about him and therefore he must be made a very public example of — his head must be paraded through the streets on a spike!

Arthur most certainly needs defending. In fact, I believe his wife is Jewish. Not that this will help him in any way.”

I was deeply moved by this eloquent email from my friend Felix, himself a Canadian citizen, as I say, who has chosen to leave Canada and live abroad because of the takeover of his country by an increasingly obnoxious, in-your-face Jewish minority. This natural aversion to being bossed around by pesky Jews naturally means that Felix is now regarded as an “anti-Semite” — a term which, according to B’nai B’rith Canada, can now be applied to four million Canadians.

It is amazing to think that even a man with a Jewish wife such as Arthur Topham should be regarded as a dangerous anti-Semite by B’nai B’rith Canada. Consider this sobering fact: not a SINGLE Canadian citizen has been named as a victim of Arthur Topham’s political activities. Who has complained to the police about Arthur Topham? Only TWO individuals out of 36 million Canadians: one a non-Jewish serial complainant, Richard Warman, already mentioned above, and the other a powerful Jew representing B’nai B’rith Canada, Harry Abrams. It is Harry Abrams who is currently leading the witch hunt against Arthur Topham.

The glib assumption that B’nai B’rith Canada, spear-headed in the British Columbia region by Jewish commissar Harry Abrams, represents Jewish interests in Canada and speaks for all Canadian Jews, is an assumption that cannot be granted. There is one Jew who certainly does not feel that B’nai B’rith Canada speaks for all Jews, and that is Arthur Topham’s Jewish wife.

I venture to say that Arthur’s Jewish wife is only one among thousands of Jews in Canada who are utterly appalled by the flagrant war crimes committed by the Jewish state in Gaza only quite recently. These Jews do not feel that B’nai B’rith Canada, with its undeviating loyalty to Israel, represents their interests in any way.

For the record, Arthur Topham’s Jewish wife is totally aware of Arthur’s political activities and is behind her husband 100 percent of the way in whatever he has said or done. Raised in a secular household of Russian Jews, Topham’s wife has no time for Zionism. She is a practicing spiritual healer, with clairvoyant abilities, who uses traditional medicines in her healing ministry. Ever since she was a child, I am told, “she has followed the Red path of the Native American Indians and never could relate to her Jewish background.”

Naturally, Arthur’s Jewish wife does not, unlike B’nai B’rith Canada, regard it as a crime that Arthur should have published The Protocols of the Elders of Zion on his site.

That B’nai B’rith Canada should actually go to the absurd length of suggesting that Arthur Topham should be sent to prison for, among other things, publishing the Protocols on his website—a book that anyone can buy anywhere—is a sure sign of desperation as well as malevolent overkill.

Apart from the Protocols, there are other books Arthur has published on his website which, according to B’nai B’rith Canada, he should not have published and which mark him out as a dangerous criminal who is a threat to Canada’s 375,000 Jews. These are books widely available not only on the internet but in major libraries and specialist bookshops, e.g., Eustace Mullins’ The Biological Jew and Elizabeth Dilling’s The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today.

Elizabeth Dilling’s book, incidentally, happens to be a meticulously researched exposé of the Babylonian Talmud, revealing in quotation after shocking quotation the bizarre mindset of Talmudic Jewry. Here are a few examples of what will be found in the Jews’ holiest book:

(1) “When a Jew murders a gentile, there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.

(2) “A Gentile girl who is three years old may be [sexually] violated.”

(3) “If a Jew is tempted to do evil, he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.”

(4) “Jesus is in hell, being boiled in hot excrement.”

B’nai B’rith Canada is naturally incensed that the official Jewish hatred of non-Jews should be so openly revealed. They would prefer to see their hatred of the non-Jewish majority kept carefully under wraps. It follows that this highly repressive Jewish organization would not only like to see Dilling’s book banned, but they would also like to see Arthur Topham given a stiff prison sentence for daring to draw attention to the book on his website.

The unbelievable chutzpah of B’nai B’rith Canada was perhaps even more flagrantly on display when they raised objections to Arthur Topham’s republication on his site of Theodore N. Kaufman’s hate-filled 1941 book Germany Must Perish! Written by a mentally deranged American Jew, this disreputable book called for the TOTAL EXTERMINATION OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE BY FORCIBLE STERILIZATION OF EVERY SINGLE GERMAN MALE!

In order to highlight the enormity of what this psychotic Jew was actually suggesting, Arthur employed the ingenious device of republishing the book on his website with a few significant alterations. First, he changed the title to Israel Must Perish! Then he substituted the word “Israel” for “Germany”, “Jew for “German”, and “Netanyahu” for “Hitler”. This at once transformed Kaufman’s hateful book into a Swiftian satire.

The point Arthur Topham was making was unmistakable. If it is permissible to call for the mass extermination of the GERMAN people by enforced sterilization of every single GERMAN MALE, then it was equally permissible to call for the extermination of the JEWISH people by the enforced sterilization of every single JEWISH male. The logic was impeccable.

Such perfect logic, however, was displeasing to B’nai B’rith Canada, Driven to desperation, this Jewish organization then resorted to dirty tricks. First it alleged, falsely, that Arthur had actually published a real, hard copy book called Israel Must Perish! He had done no such thing.

Secondly and even more egregiously, it made out that Arthur was himself advocating the genocide of the “whole Jewish population.” He was doing no such thing. It was Detective Constable Terry Wilson of British Columbia Hate Crimes Unit who told Arthur in person that B’nai B’rith Canada was attempting to make this defamatory and unprovable allegation.

Kaufman’s “hate-filled screed titled German Must Perish! [Arthur reveals on his website] “was promoted by the most prestigious mass media publications in the USA when it appeared in 1941 prior to America’s entry into the conflict. Magazines like Time and newspapers like the New York Times and the Washington Post lauded the idea of absolutely destroying the German nation and the German race as a whole, referring to this grotesquely contemptible concept as a “SENSATIONAL IDEA!”

The implacable Jewish hatred for the German people, oozing from every line of this nauseating book and easily demonstrated by its hysterical call for the mass “castration” of every single German male in the world by sterilization, was, you will regret to learn, not confined to one or two crazy Jews in Brooklyn. It was official government policy in an America already to a large extent dominated by its Jews.

In September 1944, the savagely vindictive Morgenthau Plan for Germany was unveiled. The evil brainchild of two Jews in the American administration, Harry Dexter White and Henry Morgenthau, this malevolent plan for postwar Germany amounted to little more than the mass castration of the German people—humiliation and punishment ad infinitum.

As the German propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels put it, “Hate and revenge of truly old-testament character are clear in these plans dreamed up by the American Jew Morgenthau. Industrialized Germany should be literally turned into a huge potato field.” This comment has naturally been dismissed as contemptible nonsense by the court historians and their Jewish mentors, given that Goebbels said it. Therefore to quote it as an indictment of Morgenthau is—you guessed it—”anti-Semitic”.

However, US Secretary of War Harry Stimson is not so easy to dismiss. Stimson’s final assessment of the Morgenthau Plan was that “it is Semitism gone wild for vengeance.” Morgenthau, he added, “was so biased by his Semitic grievances that he really is a very dangerous advisor to the President.” In his diary he wrote tersely: “Objective of punishment is prevention but not vengeance. Reason why Jew is disqualified.” (See here)

Needless to say, Stimson has himself been dismissed as an anti-Semite for saying this. De Judaiis nil nisi bonum.

Both Roosevelt and Churchill were to put their initials to the revengeful Morgenthau Plan. Helpless puppets of the powerful Jews who jerked their strings, it seems that neither world leader had much choice in the matter. Both lived to to regret their actions. Roosevelt later said “he had no idea how he could have initialled this.” Churchill was to parrot his words, “I had not time to examine the Morgenthau Plan in detail. I am sorry I put my initials to it.” (See here)

In his 1956 book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed was to refer to the Morgenthau Plan as “The Talmudic Vengeance.” (Title of Chapter 42). An apt description, which perhaps helps to explain why Douglas Reed is another writer whose works organized Jewry would like to see banned, along with The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and Elizabeth Dilling’s exposé of the Talmud, The Jewish Religion.


To summarize: Arthur Topham has said nothing that you or I have not said repeatedly, day in and day out. If Arthur is guilty of “hate speech”, then we are all guilty of hate speech. If Arthur is to be consigned to a Canadian prison for his views, then we all deserve to join him there and be allocated adjoining cells.

If Arthur is guilty of speaking out against the state of Israel, especially after its recent war crimes in Gaza, then we are ALL guilty—for there is not one of us who has not cried out in revulsion against the wanton mass murder and maiming of Palestinians, most of them women and children, whose only crime is that they happen to own the land the Jews covet.

Let this be noted: Canada, now almost completely under the Jewish yoke, would like to criminalize EVERY SINGLE CRITICISM OF THE JEWISH STATE. Merely to give offense to a Jew, to hurt his feelings by disagreeing with him, will soon earn you a stiff fine or a prison sentence. Here is what B’nai B’rith Canada would like to see incorporated into Canadian law:

“We must repeat again and again these basic facts — TO BE ‘anti-Israel’ IS TO BE ANTI-SEMITIC. TO BOYCOTT ISRAEL, ISRAELI PROFESSORS and ISRAELI business, these are not political acts, these are acts of hate, acts of anti-Semitism! Anti-Israel hysteria is anti-Semitic hysteria. They are one and the same.”

The above statement was made in 2009 by Yuli Edelstein, Israeli Minister of Public Diplomacy and Diaspora Affairs, The capital letters are his. (See “Criminalizing Criticism of Israel in Canada”)

Here is the picture of a Palestinian child, her head half blown off by an Israeli sniper:

Dare to express pity for this little girl and demand the punishment
of the Israeli soldier guilty of doing this to her
and you will soon face criminal proceedings in Canada

Here is the picture of an Israeli woman, an atrocity tourist who claims that the sight of Palestinian children being killed gives her exquisite pleasure, almost bringing her an orgasm:

Dare to criticize this sexually perverted Jewess and you will soon be accused of “anti-Semitism” by B’nai Brith Canada and sent to prison

Can Canadian justice sink any lower? Do Canadian citizens really want to live in a totalitarian police state run by Jews? I don’t think so. Canadian justice must not be used as an instrument of oppression by a rabid and out-of-control Jewish minority.

The witch hunt against Arthur Topham by B’nai B’rith Canada must stop.

If you are concerned for Arthur Topham
and would like to see him treated fairly


Related Topics:

Not in our Name: 225 Jewish Survivors of Nazi Genocide Condemn Israel*

Former Israeli Soldier Echoes the ISIS-Zionist Threat*

Franco-Zionist Decimation of Algeria*

Zionist Regime Shell Two Churches in Kiev*

The Talmudic Roots of Jewish Supremacism*

Now we Know Why ISIS/L is Destroying Iraq and not Defending Palestine*

A Zionist General’s Son Speaks Out!*

The Khazars and Zionists are One: The Re-invasion of the Ukraine*

Mayans Expel Jews from Guatemala Village*

Rabbi Admits Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade*

Jews against Zionism: The Case of the Haredim

1 Million Protesting Orthodox Jews Block the Road from Jerusalem – Tel Aviv*

The Case of Genocide in Canada

Face It Canada has No Sovereignty*

The Neo-Colonial Context of Canada’s Multiculturalism*

Plunging Oil Prices, ISIS and the Secret U.S – Saudi Deal*

Plunging Oil Prices, ISIS and the Secret U.S – Saudi Deal*

By Tyler Durden

Two weeks ago, we revealed one part of the “Secret Deal” between the US and Saudi Arabia: namely what the US ‘brought to the table’ as part of its grand alliance strategy in the Middle East, which proudly revealed Saudi Arabia to be “aligned” with the US against ISIS, when in reality John Kerry was merely doing Saudi Arabia’s will when the WSJ reported that “the process gave the Saudis leverage to extract a fresh U.S. commitment to beef up training for rebels fighting Mr. Assad, whose demise the Saudis still see as a top priority.”

What was not clear is what was the other part: what did the Saudis bring to the table, or said otherwise, how exactly it was that Saudi Arabia would compensate the US for bombing the Assad infrastructure until the hated Syrian leader was toppled, creating a power vacuum in his wake that would allow Syria, Qatar, Jordan and/or Turkey to divide the spoils of war as they saw fit.

A glimpse of the answer was provided earlier in the article “The Oil Weapon: A New Way To Wage War“, because at the end of the day it is always about oil, and leverage.

The full answer comes courtesy of Anadolu Agency, which explains not only the big picture involving Saudi Arabia and its biggest asset, oil, but also the latest fracturing of OPEC at the behest of Saudi Arabia…

… which however is merely using “the oil weapon” to target the old slash new Cold War foe #1: Vladimir Putin.

To wit:

Saudi Arabia to pressure Russia, Iran with price of oil

Saudi Arabia will force the price of oil down, in an effort to put political pressure on Iran and Russia, according to the President of Saudi Arabia Oil Policies and Strategic Expectations Center.

Saudi Arabia plans to sell oil cheap for political reasons, one analyst says.

To pressure Iran to limit its nuclear program, and to change Russia’s position on Syria, Riyadh will sell oil below the average spot price at $50 to $60 per barrel in the Asian markets and North America, says Rashid Abanmy, President of the Riyadh-based Saudi Arabia Oil Policies and Strategic Expectations Center. The marked decrease in the price of oil in the last three months, to $92 from $115 per barrel, was caused by Saudi Arabia, according to Abanmy.

Today’s Brent closing price: $90. Russia’s oil price budget for the period 2015-2017? $100. Which means much more “forced Brent liquidation” is in the cards in the coming weeks as America’s suddenly once again very strategic ally, Saudi Arabia, does everything in its power to break Putin.

With oil demand declining, the ostensible reason for the price drop is to attract new clients, Abanmy said, but the real reason is political. Saudi Arabia wants to get Iran to limit its nuclear energy expansion, and to make Russia change its position of support for the Assad Regime in Syria. Both countries depend heavily on petroleum exports for revenue, and a lower oil price means less money coming in, Abanmy pointed out. The Gulf states will be less affected by the price drop, he added.

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, which is the technical arbiter of the price of oil for Saudi Arabia and the 11 other countries that make up the group, won’t be able to affect Saudi Arabia’s decision, Abanmy maintained.

The organization’s decisions are only recommendations and are not binding for the member oil producing countries, he explained.


Related Topics:

Unholy Trinity United States-Israel- Saudi Arabia Sowing Discord amongst Muslims*

Saudi Arabia is Behind Current Iraqi Carnage*

Saudi: Prince Charles Seals What Cameron Could Not*

Saudi Arabia Providing anti-Tank Missiles to Rebels in Syria*

DEBKA Report: Saudi, Egypt and Israel Orchestrated Palestinian Holocaust*

Saudi Prince Joins the Opposition

Disclosure of Close Ties with Israel During Hajj Raises Saudi Concerns*

Question to Harvard Students, ISIS or the U.S. the Greatest Threat to World Peace*

Undercover Iraqi Journalist on ISIS and Why the U.S. Will Fail*

U.S. Bombing Iraqi Army*

NATO Airstrikes Target Grain Silos not ISIS*

Belgium and Serbia to Revoke Foreign Fighters’ Citizenship Unlike U.K. and U.S.*

Takfirism a Saudi and CIA Creation*

Belgium and Serbia to Revoke Foreign Fighters’ Citizenship Unlike U.K. and U.S.*

Belgium and Serbia to Revoke Foreign Fighters’ Citizenship Unlike U.K. and U.S.*

After all, it doesn’t serve British and American interests…

endless-staircase by Peter BrookerBelgium is planning legislation to deprive those who go to fight abroad of their citizenship and residency, the new coalition government announced Friday.

Under the proposals, those without Belgian citizenship could be denied entry to the country while those with dual nationality could lose their Belgian citizenship.

According to the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence, just under 300 people left Belgium in the two years up to December to fight in Syria.

The London-based think tank said Belgium was one of the most heavily affected countries in western Europe, supplying 27 fighters per million of population.

The new Belgian prime minister is due to be sworn in on Saturday. Charles Michel, 38, is the leader of the French-speaking Reformist Movement, which has formed a coalition with three Flemish parties, including the nationalist New Flemish Alliance.

Willy Borsus, vice president of the Reformist Movement, said during a press conference on Thursday that the government must  “act decisively” to fight “radicalization.”

According to Rachid al-Ghannouchi, the Tunisian leader of the Ennahda movement, discrimination in Western society is pushing young Muslims to join armed groups such as the ISIL.

Amnesty International said earlier this year that discrimination against Muslims “can result in isolation, exclusion and stigmatization.”

Serbia to Jail Foreign Fighters

Meanwhile, Serbia’s parliament approved on Friday jail terms of up to eight years for anyone found guilty of fighting in foreign wars, in an effort to dissuade citizens from joining conflicts in Syria, Ukraine and elsewhere.

The amendments to the criminal code may also be used to crack down on the lucrative business of mercenaries who have used their experience in the Yugoslav wars of the 1990s to fight for money in places such as Sierra Leone, Algeria and more recently in Libya.

Dozens of Serbian Muslims from the Sandzak region, near to Kosovo and Bosnia, have gone to fight in Syria’s civil war and at least three have died, local media have reported.

In Ukraine, dozens of Serbs, mostly hardline Orthodox Christians, have joined pro-Russian separatists battling Kiev’s forces in the east of the country. Bratislav Zivkovic, commander of a battalion in Luhansk, told Reuters in July there were some 38 Serbs at that time in his unit.

The amendments provide for jail terms of six months to five years for individual fighters, up to eight years for those leaving as an organised fighting unit and between two and 10 years for those found guilty of recruiting mercenaries or volunteer fighters.

Other Balkan countries such as Bosnia and Kosovo have taken or plan to take similar steps to stem the number of their own citizens going to fight abroad, especially in Iraq and Syria.

Several western European nations including France and Britain have also recently toughened penalties for those who join overseas conflicts amid fears that they may return radicalised by the experience and may plot attacks on home turf.

There have been no reports of radicalised Serbian citizens returning home and posing a security threat but police keep the few who do return under tight surveillance.

“These amendments are good for those reluctant (to go), as they will think twice now,” said Esad Kundakovic, a Serbian Muslim whose son Eldar was killed fighting in Syria last year.

“But if someone is determined to die, nothing will stop him.”


Related Topics:

Syrians Want Foreign Interference and Terrorists out of their Country*

The Misled Foreign Fighters in Iraq*

Calls to Prosecute Foreigners Who Volunteered for Operation Protective Edge*

ISIL Struggling to Recruit Local Fighters*

Sunni Clerics Declare Collaborating with ISIL Prohibited under Shari’ah*

Occupy World: Australian Pilots Withdraw from Airstrikes on ISIS*

Question to Harvard Students, ISIS or the U.S. the Greatest Threat to World Peace*

Massacred Syrian Town Ten Months under Siege Freed by the Syrian Army not the U.S. Coalition*

J.C. Duvalier: An Evil Cloud Over Haiti Comes to an End*

J.C. Duvalier: An Evil Blot in Haiti Comes to an End*

By Anthony L Hall

The following excerpt — from “Return of Baby Doc,” January 20, 2011 — telegraphed (and effectively sums up) my thoughts on the timely death of Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier:

The illuminati man in Haiti with co-conspirator Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier

Theories abound about Baby Doc’s return — ranging from it being pursuant to a political plot orchestrated by the US and France, to a desperate attempt to fulfill a condition Swiss banking authorities have placed on the release of what remains of his ill-gotten gains.

Whatever the case, I fear no contradiction in asserting that Baby Doc returning to Haiti makes about as much sense as Idi Amin returning to Uganda. This is why I am convinced he has returned from exile because he’s now either certifiably insane or terminally ill. And judging from his rather frail and jaundiced appearance, I suspect it’s the latter. Alas, he’s probably suffering heroic delusions of dying on home soil.

All the same, I applaud Haitian authorities for launching an immediate investigation to hold him to account not just for the violent crimes his dreaded Tonton Macoutes executed, but also for the financial crimes he perpetrated.

I just hope he stays alive long enough to face the judge before he meets his maker.


Pope John Paul II in Haiti on March 9, 1983, with the Duvaliers.

Well, here’s to dashed hopes:

Jean-Claude Duvalier, who presided over what was widely acknowledged as a corrupt and brutal regime as the self-proclaimed ‘president for life’ of Haiti until a popular uprising sent him into a 25-year exile, has died.

The former leader, known as ‘Baby Doc,’ made a surprise return to Haiti in 2011, allowing victims of his regime to pursue legal claims against him in Haitian courts and prompting some old allies to rally around him. Neither side gained much traction, however, and a frail Duvalier spent his final years quietly in the leafy hills above the Haitian capital.

(The Associated Press, October 4, 2014)

He clearly got — what I suspected was — his wish to die in peace. I can only hope now that his maker ensures that he does not rest in peace.

I fully appreciate, of course, that victims of his regime now feel doubly betrayed by Haitian President Michel Martelly. After all, he not only welcomed Baby Doc back with open arms, but expressed presidential sympathy upon his death while, as The Associated Press duly noted:

… making no mention of the widespread human rights abuses that occurred under Duvalier and his more notorious predecessor and father, Francois ‘Papa Doc’ Duvalier.

President-for-life at the age of 20

As it happens I am irreconcilably conflicted: on the one hand, I sympathize with the victims because Martelly should have acknowledged (the truth about) the Duvaliers’ legacy of corruption and human rights abuses; on the other hand, despite my declared hope for Baby Doc to face the judge, I sympathized with Martelly when he inaugurated his presidency by vowing to pursue political reconciliation … even at the expense of judicial truth and consequences.

Here in part is what I’m on record saying with respect to this latter point in “New Haitian President Seeks Reconciliation,” The iPINIONS Journal, Vol. VII, October 12, 2011:

In a deft and enlightened move, Martelly declared from the outset of his presidency that he wanted to make peace — not just with Aristide but with every other former Haitian leader as well. To this end he made quite a public show today of meeting with both Aristide and Baby Doc.

Implicit in this of course is that he will discourage any attempt to prosecute Baby Doc, and that Aristide will now be loath to challenge the legitimacy of his presidency. Beyond this, Martelly’s move is deft and enlightened because it lays the foundation for the kind of political certainty that is sine qua non for the foreign direct investments Haiti will need to rebuild….

And, after Haiti’s judicial authorities duly announced in January 2012 that Baby Doc would not stand trial for his alleged crimes against humanity (making it clear that, where there might be political reconciliation, there will be no judicial truth), I attempted to console his victims as follows:

I wish the long-suffering people of Haiti an extended period of peace, happiness, and prosperity. I am convinced that foregoing a war-crimes trial will help this wish come true.

(“Haiti Reconciles with Baby Doc,” The iPINIONS Journal, February 12, 2012)

Skulls with obvious bullet holes and machete wounds from Jean-Claude Duvalier’s Tonton Macoutes attacks are found in many dumping grounds surrounding Port-au-Prince. © Photo by Andrew Schneider

Baby Doc died of an apparent heart attack — on home soil — on Saturday. He was 63.

Good riddance, Baby Doc!


Related Topics:

Haiti Puppet Government Failed to Silence Aristide’s Influence*

Fearing Aristide, the Illegal Haitian Government Continue to Persecute Him*

100,000 Haitians Say: End Occupation, Remove Puppet Government*

Haiti: The Divine Right to Enslave Others*

Haitians Sue UN over Cholera Epidemic*