Archive | February 10, 2015

Saudi Prince Calls for Prosecution Of Officials Who Backed Egyptian Coup*

Saudi Prince Calls for Prosecution Of Officials Who Backed Egyptian Coup*

Prince Saud Bin Seif Al-Nasr

A Saudi Arabian prince has called for the prosecution of officials, including the former head of the Royal Court, who supported the coup in Egypt. Prince Saud Bin Seif Al-Nasr made his calls on Twitter and named former courtier Khalid Al-Twijri as one of those who should be brought to account, claimed on Friday.

In a series of tweets, the grandson of the late King Saud Bin Abdulaziz, alleged that around “$20 billion was stolen and divided between Al-Twijri and the Egyptian Generals.” Despite the “billions showered on Egyptian generals like rain,” he continued, “no single problem has been resolved. The Egyptians are still suffering from electricity, gas and bread crises. It is clear that the gang headed by him [Al-Twijri] stole the money with the Egyptian generals.”

Why, he asked, are the officials responsible for this waste of Saudi wealth not asking Al-Twijri and the coup generals in Egypt about the money? “No one knows the nature of this aid – a gift, a loan or anything else,” he added.

In terms of the lucrative Suez Canal Project, the prince claimed that no feasibility study was carried out. “What these people have done was merely a waste of money and tyranny for the country, the people and the Muslims. They have to be questioned.” And, he insisted, brought to account.


Related Topics:

Egypt: Israel to Support Sisi’s Regime*

Saudi Prince Joins the Opposition

How the Media Uses Neuro-Linguistic Programming*

How the Media Uses Neuro-Linguistic Programming*

By Krisztina Fazekas

Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) describes the fundamental dynamics between mind and language and how their interplay affects our body and behaviour.

  • Neuro: Concerns the brain and the things that go on in your mind. Also the rest of the neurological system, including the five senses.
  • Linguistic: This relates to language, both verbal and non verbal.
  • Programming: The unique way you put all this together to create your behaviour.

The History of NLP

NLP was created by Dr. Richard Bandler and Dr. John Grinder in the early 1970’s in California. They wanted to discover how successful people – sales executives, negotiators, public speakers, trainers, and leaders – achieve their results and then learn how to model their behaviours. They believed that their success strategies could be learned and might produce positive emotional and physical effects. Many people live a very reactionary life; things happen and then people immediately respond. NLP offers a “better way” by giving us the tools to become aware of our thoughts, feelings, and beliefs.

Experimenting With NLP

In an experiment (refer to video below) conducted by Dr. Bandler and Grinder, two men (“Mr. Nice” and “Mr. Nasty”) were placed into a controlling position where they had to talk to volunteers about different subjects. They were both asked to change their sitting position in a certain way during the discussion. The subjects talking to “Mr. Nice” were found to copy his moves by unconsciously starting to mirror him, while those talking to “Mr. Nasty” did not do this at all.

Human beings generally prefer people who are similar to themselves, and will unconsciously copy each other’s body postures and movements, voice tone and pacing. Highly successful people, or users of NLP, are aware of this tendency and use that knowledge to their advantage, copying our behaviours deliberately in order to exert control. From the 1990’s onward, NLP has become a very popular tool in advertising, marketing, and politics, and it is likely that many of us have fallen victim to this kind of manipulation at least once. The most commonly used techniques are:

Matching & Synchronization

After paying very close attention to the person NLP users are interacting with, they match or mirror our mannerisms. The more familiar the person is, the more attraction there will be. Once rapport is achieved, the NLP user can lead the interaction and influence the client, combining this technique with mimicked language patterns and leading questions.

Things they usually match include…

– Physiology: body posture, position, movement, gestures, breathing
– Voice Tone: speed, volume, pitch, timbre, rhythm
– Language: key words
– Values: what people hold as being true and important
– Experience: common interests

Note: The sets of neurons that are responsible for the capacity of learning by imitation are the mirror neurons.

Mirror Neurons

Mirror neurons help us to read other people’s minds and to understand how they feel. When we know the intention behind an action, a different system (involving mirror neurons) in our brain is activated: we follow a sequence of action, and when we can predict that sequence we can determine the implications of that sequence. For example, someone grabbing a bottle of water makes us think that the person would drink from that bottle rather than, say, throw it at us. Therefore, mirror neurons become active when a person makes a certain action and also when he/she is observing another individual making a similar action.

After creating the comfort zone, the ‘victims’ will have a certain urge to please the NLP user. Being mirrored generally leads to the point where “victims” drop their social guard, because the person they are talking to is “just like them.”


Rapport often develops naturally, so most of us probably don’t even realize when it’s happening. Once rapport is established, NLP users can lead the conversation and influence the client with bold statements such as, “Do you see what I am saying?” or, “Look at it this way.”

How to Avoid Being a Victim

When it comes to self improvement NLP certainly has its benefits. However, it has been used by many organizations and individuals to influence our behaviour and thereby exert a measure of control over that behaviour, to their advantage. We end up buying whatever it is they are selling, be it product or idea.

  • Watch out for people copying your body language. Pay attention to those who are sitting the same way as you and consider testing them by making some random movements.
  • Pay attention to eye movements. An NLP user often looks deeply into your eyes because he/she is watching the movement, not because they are that interested in your thoughts. After a certain time, they will know not only if you are lying, but also what side of your brain you are using.
  • Watch out for vague language.
  • Wait before making big decisions. Never make any decision if you are not sure, especially financial ones. Take a moment to think about it more thoroughly.

NLP in the Media

For those that are interested in learning more about how NLP is used in the mainstream media, the following video is quite in-depth in exploring its potential use. Check it out and see how you feel about what is presented:


Related Topics:

Mind Control: Mission Accomplished?

Barbarism Rules: Mind Control and Satanism in America*

“The Closer You Look, the Less You See”: The Mind Control Entertainment Industry*

PSYOPS on Social Networks

The era of programming the mind

Mind Control Technologies

Are You in Control of Your Mind?

Deleting Religious Thinking: A Governmental Agenda*

The Ideology of Charisma

Can You Just Change Your Mind Just Like That!

Mindfulness and Adolescence

Mindfulness Stops Negativity from Taking Over*

A Meeting of Minds

Aligning with the Universal Changes: Your Mind

The Problem is in the Mind, and the Solution’s in the Heart*

Australia Discontinues Services to the People Whose Land It Took*

Australia Discontinues Services to the People Whose Land It Took*

The Australian government has decided to discontinue the provision of water and electricity supplies to up to 200 indigenous communities, saying it can no longer afford the basic services, delegating it to state governments.

The remote communities, located across the northern tip of Australia and the Kimberley in the country’s northwest, will be deprived of essential services with the decision by the federal government, Vice News agency reported on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Western Australia (WA) state government has said it cannot afford to cover the costs either, estimating that at least some of the 274 communities in the state – perhaps as many as 200 – will have to close.

WA Premier Colin Barnett has, however, announced that cutting water and electricity supplies does not mean the communities will have to close down.

“There is nothing to stop people going on to land,” Barnett said.

Meanwhile, the Amnesty International’s Australia advisor Rodney Dillon has voiced the organization’s concern over the decision, saying the communities have not been informed and the decision was made by “a couple of blokes with a coffee in Perth”

“This is their homeland. It’s where they belong. It’s where they are proud. They are the keepers of the land. Some might stay and die on the land. The older individuals won’t manage it, it might kill them,” Dillon said.

The Australian indigenous protesting the death of their people under police custody in Brisbane November 2014

The Australian indigenous protesting the death of their people under police custody in Brisbane November 2014

This is not the first time the Australian government has made a decision that is widely believed to neglect the rights of the Aboriginal communities. In 2011, the government shuttered an indigenous community in Oombulgurri, in eastern Kimberley, and relocated the residents to Wyndham, about 45 kilometers away.

“They literally told these people to get out of their homes and that they couldn’t stay or come back, and then dumped them in the mangroves around the town,” Lauren Pike, a spokeswoman for the Kimberley Land Council said

“Houses weren’t provided, nothing was provided,” she said.

Around 500,000 of Australia’s 22 million-strong population claim Aboriginal heritage and cultural values.

Amnesty International has criticized the Australian government for what it describes as racially discriminatory policies toward the Aborigines.

Indigenous communities are considered the most disadvantaged in Australia, suffering higher rates of imprisonment, unemployment, illness and child mortality.


Related Topics:

Australia Still Stealing Indigenous Children*

Australia: When Recognition Means the End for the Indigenous

The Invasion of Australia – Official, At Last

Occupy Melbourne Calls for Treaty with the Original Australians

The End to a Ghettoized Spiritual Home

Stolen Generation

Calling for Indigenous Sovereignty – support the ‘Idle No More’ movement

Dying Down and Under

Last Member of 65,000-year-old Tribe Dies*

The Neo-Colonial Context of Canada’s Multiculturalism*

Disappearing and Murdered: Canada’s Indigenous Women*

Canada and Israel Partners in Racial and Humanitarian Crimes*

Is Justice Finally Knocking at Facebook’s Spy Hole?*

Is Justice Finally Knocking at Facebook’s Spy Hole?*

By Dave Hodges

FACEBOOK is facing the real possibility of paying its users up to $10,000 EACH, for violating their privacy, if the plaintiffs prevail in a developing lawsuit.

The case is known as Campbell v. Facebook Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 13-5996. The lawsuit was filed by FACEBOOK user Matthew Campbell. The suit is seeking class action status on behalf of all American users who sent or received private messages that included any website addresses in their content. And if Mr. Campbell prevails in court, FACEBOOK users could be in for a $10,000 payday.

According to Reuters, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in Oakland, California, on December 23, delivered an early Christmas present to FACEBOOK by refusing to dismiss FACEBOOK’S bid to dismiss the lawsuit.

The lawsuit, originally filed in December 2013, and alleged that FACEBOOK improperly and illegally scanned the content of users’ private messages for advertising purposes. The lawsuit accuses FACEBOOK of violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and California’s privacy and unfair competition laws. The lawsuit further contends that users included links to third-party websites in messages. In this scheme, FACEBOOK would allegedly follow the link and search for information to profile the sender’s browsing activity and then sold this private information to private advertisers. According to court documents, FACEBOOK would also create a link to a website within a private message. The private message essentially listed the private user as falsely having ‘liked’ that page via the embedded social share option button. Subsequently, the suit claims that the “likes” were then used to compile user profiles, which were then used for delivering targeted advertising to its users.

Amazingly, the brazen FACEBOOK attempted to dismiss the suit because they claimed that the intercept and marketing of the customer’s private activity transpired in the ordinary course of business. In other words, FACEBOOK, just like its alleged creator, the NSA, can go anywhere into private files and do anything they want with your proprietary information.

Judge Phyllis Hamilton struck down FACEBOOK’S argument this week when she ruled that FACEBOOK had “not offered a sufficient explanation of how the challenged practice falls within the ordinary course of its business”.

Right out of The Gospel of Wealth (i.e. Andrew Carnegie’s rationalization for his immoral business practices in the early days of industrialization), FACEBOOK believes that your web-based behavior is their property. Judge Hamilton’s enlightened view was expressed in the following ruling when she stated that  “However … An electronic communications service provider cannot simply adopt any revenue-generating practice and deem it ‘ordinary’ by its own subjective standard.”

Facebook Is Spying on Users for their Protection

While FACEBOOK claims that they ceased the practice of cyber-spying for fun and profit back in 2012, they now claim to only analyze messages to protect its users against viruses and spam. Isn’t that thoughtful and it sounds so familiar as this is the same mantra that the NSA uses to justify spying on our every communication.

By the way, another NSA intelligence gathering corporation, Google, is suspected of doing the same. One must wonder if Judge Hamilton employs a food-taster?

Don’t Spend Your $10,000 Just Yet

Although Judge Hamilton’s early judicial decisions are very pro-privacy for the common man, don’t hold your breath that you are ever going to see a nickel in punitive in damages from FACEBOOK. Remember, Judge Hamilton is part of a judicial system which ruled that your money belongs to the bank once you deposit it.

The only way to stop the FACEBOOK tyranny is withdraw your participation. I am not saying that you should quit FACEBOOK, but I am clearly saying that this is the only way to stop FACEBOOK!


Related Topics:

Can You Be Detained Over Facebook!

Google Fined for Spying on Wi-Fi Users*

Google, CIA and NSA!*

Criminal Global Governors: The Right to ‘be forgotten’ a Problem for Google*

Google Sued for Harvesting Data on Children*

Google Legally Required to Handover all Details about your G-Mail*

Consumer Activism Forces Google to Withdraw ‘Bomb Gaza’ Game app…*

From MK-Ultra to Google*

Schools to Monitor Students Social Media Posts*

PSYOPS on Social Networks

“We, the elders of Zion, pull the strings of Congress”

“We, the elders of Zion, pull the strings of Congress”

By Gilad Atzmon

For many years my detractors have pointed at the following quote as evidence of my anti Jewish sentiments:

“American Jewry makes any debate on whether the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ are an authentic document or a forgery irrelevant. American Jews do control the world.”

Both Zionists as well as anti Zionist Zionists cling to this quote as evidence that my ideas are ‘anti Semitic’.  As if Jewish power and dominance is a product of my sick imagination.

In the article on antisemitism that was published back in December 2003 I presented an extensive list of Zionist Jews in Bush Administration. I also pointed out that “in Clinton’s administration the situation was even worse. Even though the Jews only make up 1.9 per cent of the country’s population,  an astounding 56 per cent of Clinton’s appointees were Jews.”  I tried to warn Jews that their excessive power is dangerous for our universe as well as Jewry.

I have never retracted or apologised for statements of what I believed and still believe to be the truth. It is not a secret that with time, many scholars have supported my position. In 2006 Mearsheimer and Walt published their book on The Israeli Lobby.

45% of the Brits are regarded by the Jewish leaders as ‘antisemites’ because the Brits acknowledged in response to survey questions that Jews enjoy extensive power in media, politics and finance.

For 12 years I’ve been accused of being an ‘antisemite’ for stating the obvious – the question of whether the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ is an authentic document or a forgery is irrelevant. Jewish power in media, finance and politics is immense and devastatingly dangerous.

Today, Yossi Sarid, the Israeli light Zionist veteran politician agreed with my position. This is what he wrote in Haaretz:

“In these very moments, the protocols are being rewritten. Rich Jews are writing them in their own handwriting. They, in their wealth, are confirming with their own signatures what anti-Semites used to slander them with in days gone by: We, the elders of Zion, pull the strings of Congress, and the congressmen are nothing but marionettes who do our will. If they don’t understand our words, they’ll understand our threats. And if in the past, we ran the show from behind the scenes, now we’re doing it openly, from center stage. And if you forget our donations, the wellspring will run dry.”

One question remains, is telling the truth about Jewish power Antisemitism?

My answer is unequivocal. No it isn’t, truth is liberation.


Related Topics:

Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion

Zionist Media Dominates West and Middle East

Rabbis Thank Ahmedinejad for his Stance Against Zionism

How Fear was Instilled to Make Jews Leave for Israel

Undying Commitment to Israels’ War Agenda

Codifying Israeli Apartheid into U.S. Law!

The Cabal, Barbarism and Israel

Rothschild’s Israel Declares War on Syria*

Jews Protest against the State of Israel

New deal to connect Israel to European electric grid

Syrian Carve Up Begins: Israel Grants Oil Rights inside Syria!*

Egypt Hires US Lobbyist with Ties to Israel*

Rabbi Exposes Zionists after Being Tortured By Them*

On Trial in Canada for Speaking against Zionist Crimes*

Zionist Influence in U.K. Politics Comes to the Surface, Again*

Elite Zionist with Rothschild Connection is Dead*

Tony Blair Visits Caesarea, an Israeli Rothschild Estate*

Britain’s Guardian Newspaper now Owned by a Jewish Supremacist*

Jews against Zionism: The Case of the Haredim

A Zionist General’s Son Speaks Out!*

Franco-Zionist Decimation of Algeria*

Israel’s President Proclaims Israel is a “Sick Society”*

Surprise – ICC Drops Case against Israel*

For Greater Israel: Israeli Legal Jurisdiction to be Extended to Judea and Samaria*

From Nazi Germany to Modern Israel – Not a Long Shot

Ukraine: Israel’s Secret Plan for a «Second Israel»

The Damascus Terror Conference and Israeli Control of America

Spanish Police also getting Training from Israel*

Israel’s Latest War in the Planning Eight Years*

Israel, Ebola and Black Genocide*

Egypt: Israel to Support Sisi’s Regime*

Germany to Represent Israel in Islamic Countries*

Israel Closes all Embassies

Ghana’s Government Sued over “Illegal” GM Crops Policy*

Ghana’s Government Sued over “Illegal” GM Crops Policy*

Food Sovereignty Ghana (FSG) has filed a writ of summons against the Ghanaian National Biosafety Committee (NBC) and the Ghanaian Ministry of Food and Agriculture MoFA, with an application for an interim injunction to restrain the recalcitrant defendants from any release and commercialization of genetically modified cowpeas and rice until the provisions of the Biosafety Act are expressly and fully obeyed.

FSG are not only calling for an injunction on the commercialization of GM rice and Bt cowpeas, but on all GM crops until the National Biosafety Authority is in place.

FSG have taken this action as a result of the fact that

“Ghanaians are being constantly bombarded with news items containing false claims that the attempts to impose GM rice and beans are being done in accordance with the law.”

FSG maintains that this is certainly and evidently not the case. FSG’s case is very simple. According to Section 13 of the Biosafety Act, 2011, Act 831, on the

“The application to import or place on the market”, only the National Biosafety Authority has such a power to authorize the commercial release of GM foods in Ghana. The law says:

“13. ( 1) A person shall not, without the prior written approval of the Authority, import or place on the market a genetically modified organism.
(2) An application under subsection (1) shall include
(a) The information set out in the Third Schedule
(b) a risk assessment as set out in the Third Schedule, and
(c) any other information that the applicant may consider necessary for an assessment of the potential risks and benefits of the requested activity.”
[See: Ghana Biosafety Act 831 31 Dec 2011.pdf]

According to the FSG, Ghana’s National Biosafety Authority “does not even exist, because it is yet to be inaugurated. No appointments have been made and approved even for it, so under what authority are those undertaking these dangerous experiments doing so, and who is supervising them? Apparently, even the National Biosafety Committee has no power of its own apart from the authority of the Minister for Industries, Science and Technology, MIST.”

Ghana is a signatory to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Article 23 of the Protocol requires Parties, on their own and in cooperation with other States and international bodies, to promote and facilitate public awareness and education, including access to information, regarding the safe transfer, handling and use of living modified organisms (LMOs). It also requires Parties to consult the public in the decision-making process, to make public the final decision taken and to inform public about the means of access to the Biosafety Clearing-House.

Meanwhile, Section 11 (1) of the Biosafety Act states very clearly that:

“A person shall not conduct a contained or confined use activity involving genetically modified organisms or their development without the written approval of the Authority”.

The law further stipulates in Section 42 (2) that

“The Authority shall publish notices of final decisions concerning applications made under this Act in the Gazette and electronic and print media, in order to ensure public awareness and participation”. This law has not been followed by the Ghanaian authorities, who have created a veil of secrecy surrounding the experiments currently going on in Ghana, according to FSG.

FSG calls on all Ghanaians who care about the safety and the quality of food they are putting into their bodies, to show keen interest in this matter and provide them with the moral and material support we need to prosecute this case which is set to be a David versus Goliath struggle.


Related Topics:

Hooray ! Tanzania Says No to GMOs*

Sudan Seizes “Anonymous ” GM Soybean Shipment*

As France Passes, South Africa is Still Struggling with GM Crops!

Is South Africa Waking Up to the Innate Poison of GM Technology?*

Nestlé Removes GMOs from South African Baby Foods not U.S. Baby Foods*

Biotech Takeover of African Seed Companies*

Nature Bites Back at GM Corn!*

GM Crops Entrench U.S. Drought

Lifelessness in the Middle of a Drought and GM Crops!*

57 Million Americans Warn UK about GM Crops*

GM Caused Crop Failure in India and Bangladesh*

GMOs Are Mutating Microorganisms and Spawning Deadly New Life Forms‏

GMO Technology Brought Soaring Cancer, Birth Defects and Failing Farms to Argentina*

Monsanto Reports $156 Million Loss in Q4 as Farmers Abandon GM Crops*

When Man Thinks He’s God, he Releases GMO Cholera Bacteria into our Environment*

GM Potatoes: They Keep Finding Ways to Poison or Kill Us*

Russia’s GMO Import Ban Boosts Local Organic Farmers*

Colonialism in Disguise: Farmers Sued for Reusing Monsanto Seeds*

Would 11 Asian Nations be Stupid Enough to Enslave Themselves in a Trade Deal with the U.S.?*