The Paedophile Father of Alisa and Gabriel*

The Paedophile Father of Alisa and Gabriel*

This story has been going around the Internet in a manner that reduces the credibility of the children. It highlights what we have reduced our children to in this, the 21st century. Not unfortunately, it is mostly men who do the reporting of paedophilia, while ‘feminists’ only speak, and protest for their perceived rights. For those that trivialize paedophilia, this and all the untold sufferings must be heard until we redeem our humanity…

By Joe Quinn

Alisa and Gabriel are brother and sister. Alisa is 9 and Gabriel 8. They are the children of an English father and Russian mother and have lived in the Hampstead area of London for most of their lives. Hampstead is an upmarket area of London that has more millionaires within its boundaries than any other area of the United Kingdom. The children’s mother was formerly married to a Mr. Draper whom she met and married in Russia and with whom she has one son (James). Alisa and Gabriel’s father is Richard Dearman. He and the former Ms. Draper are now separated.

According to Ms. Draper, Mr. Dearman was sexually deviant, abusive and behaved violently towards her and their children during their relationship. Mr. Dearman was eventually asked to leave the family home in 2007. Over the next few years however he continued to stalk the children, showing up at their school or at the store and, on several occasions, breaking into Ms. Draper’s home. Between 2006 and 2010 the police were called out 5 times and 3 reports filed over Mr. Dearman’s abuse. Ms. Draper has testified:

The Past of an Abuser as Father

Mr Dearman has never provided financially for the children, except £10 per child per month taken off his benefits during the last 3-4 years. He hardly ever spent any quality time with them at home. He would never read a book or play games with them. The only game he seemed to play was the “tickling game”. I wasn’t happy about this since it always led to some kind of abuse. For example, Mr Dearman wouldn’t stop tickling children even though they would scream for him to stop. Besides, he would normally start this odd game late in the evening when the children would already have taken a bath and be ready for bed. This would send them hyper and those situations would almost always end up in arguments since I wanted to protect the children.

Furthermore, all of a sudden James started to dislike Mr Dearman. Mr Dearman responded with humiliating remarks and attempted to discipline James in strange ways. For example, he would lock him up, while I was at work or shopping, and he would give him a bucket to pee and poo. This would almost always also result in arguments.

He also harassed me sexually, pressuring me to have anal sex with him. He then bought a gigantic artificial penis suggesting for me to use. On many occasions he attempted to get me to watch online pornography.

I objected to his perverted sexual attempts, threw the sex toy in the bin and asked Mr Dearman to pick his stuff he had in my house and not to come there again. (2007) However, he came to school to “surprise” the children and often stalked us, showing up from nowhere: in the park, or on the way to school and in shops.

I warned him on many occasions to stop doing this. But he requested to see the children. Many times he came and knocked on my door without prior notice and several times he broke in through the garden door. On one of such occasions he was violent and humiliated my mother by screaming and hitting her. He ran away before I dialled the police.

Since stalking continued, I applied for an Emergency Court Order, and a Non-Molestation Order was granted for a month initially and then extended for 8 months while proceedings for contact were going on.

I sent Alisa to Russia to stay with my parents. Unfortunately her passport ran out and she ended up staying slightly longer than anticipated.

A week after my application, his solicitors applied for a Prohibited Steps Order since he claimed that I was trying to take the children out of the country. This was dismissed and there is currently no such Order in place.

Mr Dearman also made an application for contact. This was eventually granted in spite of my concerns for the children’s safety. He started to see them regularly: every Saturday from 10am to 6pm.

However, contacts were not going well at all. Mr Dearman was consistently returning the children late. He rejected my advice regarding their diet and was returning packed lunches of home prepared food.

Alisa and Gabriel were frequently getting sick during contact. Many times they vomited while in his care or after they came back home. Sometimes they developed headaches and stomach aches. I blamed this on food that Mr Dearman was feeding them with.

My solicitors and I have sent numerous reminders, requesting not to feed the children with processed, sugary snacks. On one occasion Alisa developed high fever and hardly moved. I contacted the emergency doctor’s line and almost took her to the emergency room.

Not only were the children returning sick or becoming sick shortly after, each time they were coming back in a terrible emotional and psychological state. A lot of Mondays or first part of the school week were missed as a result and affected the children’s education.

During the summer of 2014, Ms. Draper’s new partner, Mr. Christie, caught the children sexually touching not only themselves but a pet dog. This discovery led to a series of exchanges between Mr. Christie and the two children that he video-taped, where the children gave a shocking and very detailed description of horrific sexual abuse and child sacrifice at the hands of their father and, according to the children, many members of staff at the Christchurch Primary School in Hampstead that they attended. The children also implicated other parents, attorneys, doctors, the school nurse and employees of the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), an English governmental body set up to safeguard and promote the welfare of children involved in family court proceedings.

In the tapes, Gabriel and Alisa display a highly abnormal awareness of adult sexual activity and give detailed descriptions of alleged distinguishing marks on the genitals of their alleged abusers. In one segment Alisa describes how her father, Richard Dearman, held his hand on hers and “because we’re not so strong, because the spine is there, my father, RD, holds our hand and cuts off the baby’s head, and if his hand is on it he wipes off his fingerprints“.

The full series of videos can be viewed here.

In early September 2014, Ms. Draper informed Barnet police of the testimony of the children and provided them with the video-taped evidence. A police inquiry began and the children were interviewed. A police medical examination was ordered that confirmed that the children had been sexually abused, with serious injuries to the inside of rectum area noted. A hair sample analysis was also conducted to determine if the children had ingested any drugs, although Ms. Draper claims the results of the test were never revealed to her. On September 11th Gabriel and Alisa were taken into protective custody and six days later Ms. Draper was informed that both children had retracted their allegations against their abusers. Barnet police then closed the case on the basis of this retraction and that other allegations made by the children (including claims of secret abuse rooms in both the school and a local McDonald’s restaurant) were false.

It appears that the police inquiry concluded that the allegations were fabricated and that the children had probably been coached by Mr. Christie (the man heard in the videos). A witness statement by retired police constable K. Wilson, who apparently had access to parts of the police report, is generally critical of the overall investigation:

To state categorically that the children had been coached (which is written on the Crime Report) which I understand is the assertion from Social Services, is simply not feasible.

Some investigation has been conducted into proving or disproving, however most appear to be slanted towards merely disproving the offences occurred […]

This investigation does not look at the fact that the children are giving accounts of abuse and how they came to use such language other than to suggest Mr Christie coached the children.

Other named suspects who are professionals were not formally interviewed.

Investigators should not make assumptions that due to the unlikely or seemingly ridiculous nature of the allegation that it is untrue. If an account appears to be untrue corroboration should be sought for this also.

I do not feel it was suitable to close this investigation at this point without further enquiries and corroboration being sought.

The two children are now in the custody of child welfare. Their mother is allowed to see them once every two weeks while their father is allowed to see them once a week. Between September and December 2014, three family court hearings were held with both of the children’s parents arguing their case. A 12-day fact-finding hearing is scheduled to start on February 16th at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. The hearing will be held in secret.

In Context

While much of what the two children claim in the videos appears to be the figment of their imagination – that 100 parents attend the sexual abuse sessions and that sessions take place in McDonalds and Starbucks for example – according to the police report they have been sexually abused, and that abuse has taken place in a country (the UK) where there is long-standing culture of sexual abuse of children, including by people in positions of power and influence.

A 1990 National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children document, which was the subject of London Times newspaper story by Libby Jukes and Richard Duce, titled “NSPCC says ritual child abuse is rife” found that, of 66 child protection teams in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 14 teams had received reports of ritual abuse from children and seven of them were working directly with children who had been ritually abused, sometimes in groups of 20.

Peter McKelvie, a former UK local authority child protection chief, recently blew the whistle on what he said is a VIP paedophile ring that has been abusing children for 65 years and included at least 20 high-profile members of the British Establishment, including people linked to the Royal family. McKelvie told the BBC:

For the last 30 years – and longer than that – there have been a number of allegations made by survivors that people at the top of very powerful institutions in this country, which include politicians, judges, senior military figures and even people that have links with the Royal Family, have been involved in the abuse of children.

Then there was the notorious Elm guest house in SW London where the rich and influential came to abuse and murder young boys in the 1970s and 80s. One confirmed visitor through the front door was Cyril Smith, a jovial 406-pound Liberal MP. Private Eye investigative magazine has suggested that Special Branch, the UK’s national security police, halted police inquiries into Smith in the 1970s to prevent the collapse of the Liberal-Labour coalition government. Following his death last month, former British Home Secretary Leon Brittan has been accused by Labour MP Tom Watson of “multiple child rape” at the guest house. Watson claims to have spoken to two people abused by Brittan. In October 2012, Watson told the House of Commons that police should “investigate clear intelligence suggesting a powerful paedophile network linked to Parliament and Number 10.”

Two journalists – the former news editor of the Surrey Comet and the former editor of the Bury Messenger – both stated in November 2014 that during the 1980s they had been served with D-notices, or warnings from the government not to publish material that might damage national security, in response to their investigations into paedophile politicians at the guest house.

A victim of the same Westminster paedophile ring recently came forward with his account of child abuse at the hands of the elite:

A victim of the alleged Westminster paedophile ring that operated nearly three decades ago has claimed he saw a Conservative MP strangle a young boy to death at an “abuse party”.

The victim, who has been named “Nick,” has detailed the murder of the 12-year-old boy to police, The Sunday People and Exaro investigations agency, and alleged that two other boys were also killed by the abusers.

He claims he was first abused at a Christmas Party at the age of 11, where he and the other children were ordered not to speak to each other.

He said: “We were asked if we wanted a drink. It was always whisky. Both MPs were brutal. I was raped over a bath-tub while my head was beneath the water.”

Nick claims that the first death of one of the victims of sexual abuse was of a boy aged 10 or 11, who was killed after he was deliberately run down by a car being driven by one of the perpetrators. Nick has described how he took the death to be a warning to him not to talk to anyone about the abuse he experienced.

Nick said he was handed to the paedophile ring of MPs and other prominent figures by his abusive father, and that he and other boys often picked up by “luxury cars with a chauffeur” and taken to “abuse parties” at different locations, including an apartment complex near Parliament.

Gabriel and Alisa’s father, Ricky Dearman, is accused of sexual and physical abuse of both her and her children. If true, the above statement by “Nick” that it was his father that handed him over to the Westminster paedophile network may provide a clue to the reality behind the apparently outlandish stories of Gabriel and Alisa. One would imagine that paedophile politicians would, at this stage, take great care to ensure that their depraved predilections remained secret. This might involve deliberate attempts to manipulate and confuse the horribly traumatized children and “coach” them on a cover story that no one would believe because core aspects of the story could be easily disproved.

While the abusers go to great lengths to hide their depravity, it is also the extent of the depravity of the abuse that serves as protection against the abusers ever being exposed. That, and the fact that many of the abusers appear to be government and other authority officials. Who would ever believe that a supposed normal human being, much less an authority figure, would take pleasure from brutally raping a small boy and then strangling him to death? Even as we write that, we feel the mind attempting to consign it to the realm of make-believe or conspiracy theory. Yet there seems little doubt that British ‘public servants’ did (and very likely still do) engage in such depraved inhuman acts.

While horrific, the abuse by British politicians of the most vulnerable in British society mirrors British political policy towards vulnerable people around the world. Just as British children are ‘consumed’ by Westminster politicians, the energy and lives of the most vulnerable people around the world are consumed by the same people through British government advocacy of and engagement in military attacks on the largely defenceless peoples of foreign nations.

Yemeni boy killed in drone strike told reporters only months before he was terrified of ‘death machines’ in sky

Mohammed Tuaiman: also murdered by Western paedophile politicians

There are countless stories like the story of Alisa and Gabriel. Most remain unknown to the general public, and many (perhaps most) have resulted in a serious miscarriage of justice. While no one can be blamed for not putting much stock in the court of public opinion, these days, even less faith should be placed in the courts of the established authorities that have shown themselves time and again to be controlled by the wicked and corrupt political elite. As such, there’s seems little reason not to reveal the details of the story of Alisa and Gabriel despite the fact that they are the subject of ongoing litigation.

Regardless of the results of the hearing on Feb. 16th, they are, and will remain the victims. Like so many other children around the world.

A Yemini boy killed in drone strikes had spoken to a British newspaper just months before his death about his fear of the “death machines” in the sky. Mohammed Tuaiman, 13, described to the Guardian how he, his friends and their neighbours in al-Zur village in Marib province were all terrified of the drones in the airspace above.

“A lot of the kids in this area wake up from sleeping because of nightmares from them and some now have mental problems,” he told the newspaper.


Related Topics:

Why is the Legalization of Gay Marriage so Important to the Queen?*

British Paedophilia Victim Speaks Out!*

BBC’s Stuart Hall Sentenced for Paedophilia

Conscientious Police Officer Warned off British Elite Paedophile Ring*

Power and Paedophilia Rife in the US Government*

Boy Scout of America Encyclopaedia of Sexual Abuse 1947 -2005

The Paedophilia Past of Eurozone’s Chancellor Merkel’s Coalition Party*

Sexual Liberation a Tool of Mass Control*

Paedophilia in Jewish Mikvah’s*

Inuit Children Defended Themselves against Paedophile Priest*

Religious Schools Face Closure if they don’t Promote Homosexuality*

Parents Attacked for Protesting against the Sexualization of their Children*

Moroccans Say No Royal Pardon for Spanish Elite Paedophile Network*

Yemen: U.S. Backed Government Forced to Flee, but Will that Stop Them?*

Eugenics: Kidnapping of the Indigenous Sioux in South Dakota*