Archive | March 14, 2015

Poroshenko Talking Peace but Preparing for War backed by 11 E.U. Countries*

Poroshenko Talking Peace but Preparing for War backed by 11 E.U. Countries*

Have you been following the good guy (E.U.) – bad guy U.S. – Israel) act for and against WWIII? Don’t forget neither the U.S. or Israel are sovereign states, and are both beholden to their masters in Europe… but power corrupts absolutely and the fear of losing it.

 According to the popular Russian television channel Russia-1, Pyotr Poroshenko’s father was a Jew named Alexei Valtsman from the Odessa region who in 1956 took on the last name of his wife, Yevgenya Poroshenko. Poroshenko is an oligarch from Odessa, owns Channel 5 . When Poroshenko was ‘elected’ Ukraine’s Jewish Communist Party said:

“When national security and the activities of law-enforcement are entrusted to a businessman whose actions have often contradicted the law, and who has been caught falsifying State budgets, one can hardly believe in pre-election promises that all the criminals would be jailed.”

The head of one of eastern Ukraine’s breakaway republics asks why Ukraine’s president is publically talking about the delivery of weapons from nearly a dozen countries in Europe while simultaneously proclaiming his commitment to peace.

Igor Plotnitsky, leader of the self-proclaimed Lugansk People’s Republic, has asked why a Kiev looking for lasting peace in eastern Ukraine has just announced the purchase of weapons from nearly a dozen European countries.

“Yesterday, Petro Alekseevich [Poroshenko] talked about signing contracts on weapons delivery with 11 countries. The question which arises is why he needs weapons if he had first asked for peace,” Plotnitsky noted.

Plotnitsky added that “we have already encountered this [kind of trickery] before, and understand that [Ukrainian authorities] cannot act any other way, because they are just clowns in a circus, while the owner is located overseas.”

On Friday evening, Poroshenko noted in an interview for Ukrainian television channel 1+1 that his government has recently “signed agreements on the delivery of weaponry, including lethal weaponry, with 11 EU countries.” Poroshenko did not specify which countries he had in mind.

Poroshenko added that the US had made a crucial and long-awaited decision this week by agreeing to provide Ukraine with $75 million in “defensive weaponry.” The contract includes 30 armored Humvees, up to 200 unarmored Humvees, counter-mortar radars, drones, radios and medical equipment.

The Ukrainian President noted that his country will not be reducing its defense capabilities, adding that “intensive combat training is being held” and he is prepared to act in coordination with allies in the event of “a new round of aggression against Ukraine.”

In February, senior officials from over a dozen European countries, including Germany, France and the UK had ruled out supplying the Ukrainian armed forces with lethal aid in the present circumstances. The countries made their announcements in response to deliberation in Washington on whether or not to supply Kiev with lethal aid, which had raised European fears about a further escalation of the conflict in eastern Ukraine.


Related Topics:

The Earthquake that Stopped Before Hitting Ukraine and Russian Borders*

No Gas from Russia to Europe

From Tahrir – Ukraine’s Orchestrated Unrest*

U.S. has Already Spent Five Billion Dollars to Subvert Ukraine*

The Biden Dynasty Makes Its Mark in the Ukraine*

Ukraine: Europe’s Israel*

Forced Organ Harvesting in the Ukraine*

Ukraine: Israel’s Secret Plan for a «Second Israel»

The EU wants Russia to Bail out the Ukraine and the EU*Playing with Iran to Alienate Russia and Destabilize Iran*

U.S. undermining Hungary to undermine Russia*

Ukraine and the NWO Crisis’s*

Arizona State Nullifies Common Core, 34-23*

Arizona State Nullifies Common Core, 34-23*

Mar. 10, 2015 the Arizona state house passed a bill that would ban Common Core, nullifying its implementation. The vote was 34-23.

Introduced by State Reps. Mark Finchem (R-11), Brenda Barton (R-6), Jay Lawrence (R-23), and Noel W. Campbell (R-1), House Bill 2190 (HB2190) would prohibit the state board of education from adopting or implementing Common Core standards in the state. It would also render null and void any previous implementations of these standards.

HB2190 would strike a dagger through the heart of the national educational plan that jeopardizes local control over schools. The bill reads, in part:

The state board of education may not enter into any agreement, memorandum of understanding or contract with any federal agency or private entity that in any way cedes or limits state discretion or control over the process of developing, adopting or revising subject matter standards and corresponding statewide student assessments in the public school system.

The bill also contains a provision pertaining to revisions of the state academic content standards that mandates the state board of education to hold a public meeting in each congressional district prior to doing so. This would make it more difficult for Common Core or something similar to sneak through without any public awareness.

Rejecting nationalized education standards is the first steps toward bringing true academic choice, and freedom. Passage of this legislation would represent a positive step forward for the people of Arizona and a path for other states to follow.

HB2190 now moves to the state Senate, where it will first be assigned to a committee before the full Senate can consider it.


For Arizona: Take steps to support HB2190 HERE.

For other states: Take measures to fight Common Core in your state HERE.


Related Topics:

Brick-by-brick: Missouri Judge Rules Common Core Unconstitutional*

A Loophole that Could Save Maryland From Common Core*

Parent Forced to Call 911 When School Refuses to Release Child over Common Core Testing*

7 Children Kidnapped by the State from Homeschooling Family to Remain in Custody*

From Public Schools to Indoctrination Centres*

Top Teachers Resigning because of Common Core*

Parents Belittled for Questioning School Curriculum*

U.K. Free School to Close for Allowing God into the Curriculum*

Scottish Primary School Kids Given Terrorism Homework*

Gay Activist Admits our Goal is to Indoctrinate Children*

Amsterdam Revolts against the Neo-liberalism in Education

The Vanishing Indigenous Nations of the U.S. – Five Facts*

The Vanishing Indigenous Nations of the U.S. – Five Facts*

Disarmed, held in concentration camps, their children taken away, half starved, the Indigenous peoples of the West found a form of resistance that spread like wildfire in all directions from its source, thanks to a Paiute holy man, Wovoka…Pilgrims journeyed to hear his message and to receive directions on how to perform the Ghost Dance, which promised to restore the Indigenous world as it was before colonialism, making the invaders disappear and the buffalo return. ~Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz

Vision_Quest By Clarence KapayThomas Magstadt lists a few facts about U.S. history from a new book about Indigenous people of the nation written from the perspective of non-Indigenous people. It’s time we as a nation recognize our past wrongs so we can finally heal.

VisionQuestFew things are more likely evoke a “fight or flight” reaction than facts. Facts make us uncomfortable. The latest issue of Scientific American features an article exploring this…uh…fact at some length (“Why People ‘Fly from Facts’”). The piece starts with a conversation that has become a cliché among members of the medical community:

“There was a scientific study that showed vaccines cause autism.”

“Actually, the researcher in that study lost his medical license, and overwhelming research since then has shown no link between vaccines and autism.”

“Well, regardless, it’s still my personal right as a parent to make decisions for my child.”

In other words, never mind the facts – individual rights, however misguided, always trump collective rights, even where the health and welfare of society is at stake.

Here are a few facts about US history from a new book about Indigenous peoples of the US written from the perspective of the losers:

Fact #1: “The total population of the hemisphere was about one hundred million at the end of the fifteenth century…. At the same time, the population of Europe…was around fifty.”

Fact #2: “There are more than five hundred federally recognized Indigenous communities and nations, comprising nearly three million people in the United States [today]. These are descendants of the fifteen million original inhabitants of the land, the majority of whom were farmers who lives in towns.”

Fact #3: The Americas “discovered” by Christopher Columbus were relatively “disease-free”; the proof is in the pre-existing population density. Germs brought from Europe were a major cause of the massive die-off of Indigenous peoples who were susceptible to diseases that had once been epidemic on the other side of the Atlantic but to which the European invaders had become largely immune.

Fact #4: There are currently 310 federally recognized reservations in the United States encompassing a total land base of less than 2.3% of its original size.

Indigenous peoples inhabited every region of North and South America for centuries and even millennia before the arrival of the first Europeans. According to the US Department of Agriculture, the United States has a total land area of about 2.3 billion acres.

In 1881, total Indian landholding had contracted to 156 million acres. By 1934, less than a third remained (about 50 million acres), thanks to the Indian Wars and the General Allotment Act of 1887. The US Government took another 500,000 acres for military use during WWII. Still more Native American lands were seized during the post-war “termination era”.

Fact #5: The idea that “Indians” did not grow crops or till the soil or exploit Nature’s bounties is ahistorical, at best, at worst, a Big Lie invented to rationalize policies and acts that objectively fit the legal definition of genocide. As a pretext for US relocation and termination policies, it was used to validate the view that Native Americans had no moral or legal claim to the land they inhabited and no sovereign rights.

In point of fact, the Indigenous peoples of the Americas cultivated corn, beans, squash, chili peppers, potatoes, yams, tomatoes, cocoa, and pumpkins, among other food crops, as well as cotton and tobacco. Traces of corn cultivation in central Mexico date back ten thousand years. Dunbar-Ortiz notes:

“Since there is no evidence of corn on any other continent prior to its post-Columbus dispersal, its development is a unique invention of the original American agriculturalists.”

The term “genocide” is most commonly applied to the Holocaust. It is a crime under international law under a United Nations convention adopted in 1948; the United States finally ratified it in 1988 – to answer the question why it would have taken forty years one has to look no further than the history of the US Indian wars.

Genocide became official policy in the 1830s during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. In 1836, US Army general Thomas S. Jesup wrote of the Seminoles:

“The country can be rid of them only by exterminating them.”

And here are the words of General William Tecumseh Sherman writing in 1873:

“We must act with vindictive earnestness against the Sioux, even to their extermination, men, women and children…during an assault, the soldiers can not pause to distinguish between male and female or even discriminate as to age.”

The Genocide Convention is not retroactive or the US Senate would never have ratified it. Moreover, the US Government has never unconditionally accepted the juridical authority of the World Court in cases involving alleged US violations of international law (the principle of “compulsory jurisdiction”).

The habit of denying what we can’t explain, admit, or justify is all-too-human, and it applies to nations as well as individuals. The moral question quickly gets tangled in a web of legal and financial issues – restitution and reparations, as well as who’s responsible in the present for crimes committed in the past. In the emotionally and politically charged realm of morality and public policy, genocide against Indigenous peoples competes with the institution of Black slavery – both represent features of the nation’s past that mock the patriotic majority’s preferred image of itself, as well as a mythologized system of constitutional democracy based on free enterprise they believe to be exceptional in world history.

Nations can’t begin to atone for past wrongs without first recognizing them. It is official German policy not to deny the Holocaust – the Nazi-engineered genocide under Hitler. That doesn’t settle anything, of course, but it’s a necessary step in the right direction. By contrast, Japan has never fully accepted responsibility for the atrocities it committed against civilian populations and POWs in World War II.

Despite the facts, despite all the irrefutable, incriminating evidence that can never be expunged from the record, we tend to see ourselves – our history as a nation – as fundamentally different from Germany and Japan. Native American survivors know it’s not true. It’s high time the rest of us recognize it so we can finally begin a healing process that’s long overdue.


Related Topics:

The Taino of the Caribbean: the People Who Do Not Exist

And One Ring to Bind Them All*

The Doctrine of Discovery

Joint Statement on UN Declaration and the Doctrine Of Discovery

The Hypocrisy of Anti-Immigration in Arizona 

U.S. Set to Destabilize the Rest of the World

The American Iron Curtain

100 Mile Border Around the U.S.

13th Amendment Ratified When the Rest of the Population Becomes Enslaved!

The American Dream…

Indigenous View on Thanksgiving

The Hopi Call for Water Rights

One Economy, One Government, Your World!

Mayans Call on UN for New Era of Peace!


Idle No More: New Shift to an Indigenous Reality

Calling for Indigenous Sovereignty – support the ‘Idle No More’ movement

The Three Hundred: Free Democratic US Elections – Did they ever Exist!*

Christopher Columbus’s Reign of Terror in the Caribbean

Correcting Columbus Day*

Censorship of History Curriculum: Students Employ Civil Disobedience*

Insulted By Big Bank Control, the Lakota Nation Create its own Currency*

Australia Still Stealing Indigenous Children*

Soul Murder and the Profound Brokenness of Human Culture

Global Pathocracy*

Why the West Destroys and Humiliate Peoples

Eugenics: Kidnapping of the Indigenous Sioux in South Dakota*

Gay Activist Admits our Goal is to Indoctrinate Children*

Gay Activist Admits our Goal is to Indoctrinate Children*

By Pete Baklinski

A homosexual activist has candidly admitted that gay-themed materials and policies pushed in grade schools across North America are for the sake of “indoctrinating” children into an unquestioning acceptance of homosexuality.

“I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn’t indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie,” writes long-time Canadian gay activist S. Bear Bergman in a piece appearing on Huffington Post a week ago tellingly titled ‘I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And I’m Not a Bit Sorry).’

Bergman, who runs a Toronto-based publishing company making books for children that positively portrays “LGBTQ” people, is the transgender partner of J. Wallace, a gender equity adviser at the Toronto District School Board (TDSB).

Bergman writes that as a young activist, he often entertained a “delicious fantasy” of wishing that as a child he had been given the pro-LGBTQ mentors, workshops, and resources that kids today are freely given in schools.

“In [my fantasy], I was ushered into the world of queerness with care and tenderness by experienced homos and trans people (in my imagination they were like very fabulous versions of my favourite camp counsellors from childhood). I would be issued my leather jacket and my protest pins, my safer sex supplies and a hotline of some kind I could call if I needed it.”

Bergman recounts that as a young gay activist he was taught how to refute accusations that the movement was engaging in “indoctrination and recruiting.” He was to tell concerned parents that he was “just providing an alternate viewpoint.” He was to use “soft” language when speaking about homosexuality.

But Bergman writes that he is tired of the “lie.”

“All 25 years of my career as an LGBTQ activist, since the very first time as a 16-year-old I went and stood shaking and breathless in front of eleven people to talk about My Story, I have been on a consistent campaign of trying to change people’s minds about us. I want to make them like us. That is absolutely my goal … even if that goes against the way you have interpreted the teachings of your religion.”

“I want to be present in their emotional landscapes as a perfectly nice dad and writer who is married to another guy. Who used to be a girl (kind of). Who is friendly and cheerful and not scary at all, no matter what anyone says.”

“That is our job: to encourage people, especially children, to think differently about a subject than they do now,” he continues.

“To dispel the dim and dismal miasma of myths and stereotypes, and instead allow the light of truth and fairness to shine in. That’s the deal, my friends. And if we have done it — if we have come to a place where a kid has been struggling in the muck of ignorance and hatred, and helped them up and cleaned them off and sent them to play in a meadow of love or at least kindness — then baby, we have done the thing well.”

While Bergman paints a “friendly and cheerful” picture of the gay lifestyle, he fails to mention the serious health risks tied to homosexual behaviours. These include increased rates of sexually transmitted diseases, bacterial and viral infections, depression, and even cancer.

Research done in 2002 by Dr. John R. Diggs found that same-sex sexual behaviours expose gays, lesbians and bisexuals to “extreme risks of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), physical injuries, mental disorders and even a shortened life span.” Common sexual practices among gay men were found to lead to “numerous STDs and physical injuries, some of which are virtually unknown in the heterosexual population.” Gay and bisexual men were found to “lose up to 20 years of life expectancy.”

The US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) have warned on numerous occasions that HIV rates, already at epidemic proportions, are continuing to climb steadily among men who have ‘sex’ with men. The CDC has stated that gay and bisexual men continue to remain at the epicenter of what they call a “HIV/AIDS epidemic.”

Bergman also fails to point out the spiritual damage that religions across the world say is caused by homosexual activity. Christianity, Islam, and Judaism categorically reject homosexual practices in the strongest language as a direct rejection of God and his plan for human sexuality.

Christianity — “For this reason God gave them up to dishonourable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error” (Letter to Romans 1:26).

Islam — “…For ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds…. And we rained down on them a shower (of brimstone)” (The Qur’an 7:80-84).

Judaism — “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination” (Leviticus 18:22).

The Catholic Church calls homosexual acts “intrinsically disordered” since they “close the sexual act to the gift of life.”

Despite accusations of ‘homophobia,’ the Catholic Church actually teaches that people struggling with same-sex attraction “must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sing of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided.”

Bergman is not the first homosexual activist to admit the movement aims to “indoctrinate” children into their worldview.

In 2011 U.S. gay activist Daniel Villarreal penned a column for stating that the time had come for the homosexual lobby to admit to “indoctrinating” schoolchildren to accept homosexuality.

“Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?”

“We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it. Recruiting children? You bet we are,” he added.

“I for one,” continued Villarreal, “certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start f**ing men.”

In September 2014, Bergman’s publishing company offered a free “trans-positive kids (JK-2) book” to Toronto District School Board libraries. He said he was combating “fear-mongering” from school trustee Sam Sotiropoulos who had taken a stand against homosexual activism in the school board.

Bergman and Wallace’s book list for kids to “break gender stereotypes” has 54 titles, including:

  • Girls Will Be Boys Will Be Girls
  • Sometimes the Spoon Runs Away with Another Spoon
  • The Princess Knight
  • A Girl Named Dan
  • It’s Okay to be Different.
  • 10,000 Dresses
  • My Princess Boy
  • My Mommy is a Boy
  • When Kathy is Keith

Bergman concludes his Huffington Post by declaring he would be “delighted” if he could convince children to disagree with their parents on homosexuality.

“I want kids to know [we’re perfectly fine and often really excellent] even if their parents’ or community’s interpretation of their religious tenets is that we’re awful. I would be happy — delighted, overjoyed I tell you — to cause those children to disagree with their families on the subject of LGBTQ people.”

“If that makes me an indoctrinator, I accept it. Let me be honest — I am not even a little bit sorry.”


Related Topics:

Kids in Same-sex Households at Greater Risk of Mental Health Problems*

Ontario’s Premier Grooming Youngsters for Sex

UN’s Heterophobic Agenda*

The Origin of AIDS*

Religious Schools Face Closure if they don’t Promote Homosexuality*

Why is the Legalization of Gay Marriage so Important to the Queen?*

****Up Nature: Sex change for Nine-year-olds*

Taking School Sex Education too Far*

Parents Attacked for Protesting against the Sexualization of their Children*

Sexual Liberation a Tool of Mass Control*

Why the West Destroys and Humiliate Peoples

And One Ring to Bind Them All*

Sex attacks on under-11s rise by 14 per cent in one year

The U.S. Expanding its Domain to Space and Cyberspace*

The U.S. Expanding its Domain to Space and Cyberspace*

This has already apparent in the increasing numbers of questionable UFO sightings around the world…

The US Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard have revised America’s maritime strategy to add “all domain access” to its traditional sea-based defense functions, a Navy report says.

“This [all domain access] function assures appropriate freedom of action in any domain — the sea, air, land, space, and cyber-space, as well as in the electromagnetic (EM) spectrum,” the Friday report, titled “A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower,” says.

According to the US Navy, all domain access will complement the four traditional functions of US sea power, which include deterrence, sea control, power projection and maritime security, by adding cross-domain capabilities such as cyberspace operations, networking and electromagnetic warfare.

“Electromagnetic Maneuver Warfare (EMW), a relatively new concept, blends fleet operations in space, cyberspace, and the electromagnetic spectrum with advanced non-kinetic capabilities to create war-fighting advantages,” the Navy report says.

US Navy Deploys Drones Under Arctic Ice, Competes With Russia for Waterways – © Flickr/ NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

According to the report, the United States will focus on expanding its forward presence in Asia, the Middle East and Europe to address non-state actors and rivals like Iran and Russia.

The US Department of Defense (DOD) spending on major weapons programs has sunk to its lowest level in a decade, according to a US Government Accountability Office (GAO) report released on Thursday.

The DOD said that defense spending overall will be cut by ten percent until 2021, under the defense-related provisions of sequestration, which will result in $487 billion in cost savings.

The US military budget has declined from its peak of nearly $700 billion in 2010, according to DOD data.


Related Topics:

US Deploys ‘Sky Dreadnought’ Over Ukraine; Media Calls it ‘UFO’‏

Question to Harvard Students, ISIS or the U.S. the Greatest Threat to World Peace*

U.S. Nuclear Threat and a Failed Assassination*

WiFi — an Invisible Threat to all Life*

NASA Exploding Launch: Intervention of a Higher Kind?*

The Real Reason Why NASA Is Being Shut Down*

Earth Raising its Own Defence against Powerful Solar Storms*

The HAARP Facility Shuts Down!*

The Pine Gap in the Global Missile Defense System

Geoengineering the Weather!

Throwing a ‘Flame’ Across Cyberspace!

NDAA 2014 Bill will Cut Communications with the Outside World*

Europe’s Multinational Militarized Police*

Locations of NSA Global Spy Stations*

And One Ring to Bind Them All*

Open Letter to the People of Iran from the People of the United States*

Open Letter to the People of Iran from the People of the United States*

From Infowar.comFrom A.N.S.W.E.R.

It has come to our attention while observing the nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States government that a group of 47 U.S. Senators are attempting, against the will of the majority of the American people, to sabotage any agreement due to their hope of creating additional conflict between our country and the people of Iran.

We would also like to bring to your attention that many people in the United States are aware that the United States government is in violation of a treaty approved by the Senate and signed into law. The treaty imposes an affirmative obligation on the United States and all other countries possessing nuclear weapons to act to diminish and eventually eliminate all of their existing nuclear weapons as a condition for relieving non-nuclear countries of the need to acquire such terrifying weapons. The official name of this treaty is the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons or NPT.

We also wanted to bring to your attention that under the U.S. Constitution, (Article 6, Clause 2), any treaty approved by the Senate and signed into law “shall be the supreme law of the land” in the United States.

Article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty requires the United States as a nuclear power to: “pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control“. (our emphasis)

We wanted to make sure that you were aware that the U.S. Constitution, recognizing the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as the supreme law of the land in the United States, requires government officials to carry out two specific tasks:

First, to eliminate the U.S. nuclear arsenal under its Treaty pledge of “general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control;”

And second, to “pursue negotiations in good faith” with other nations for the achievement of nuclear disarmament.

As things stand, the United States is in violation of this “supreme law of the land.”

The United States is not ridding itself of nuclear weapons. It possesses thousands of operational nuclear weapons that it is not destroying. In fact, it is in the process of improving their capability, deploying them on updated fighter aircraft, and other land-attack missiles, aircraft carriers and submarine platforms at the cost of hundreds of billions of dollars in new government funding.

The United States also provides more than $4 billion in military and economic aid to the state of Israel although Israel refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, or allow outside inspectors, and does not deny that it possesses a considerable arsenal of nuclear weapons. We are not aware of any call by U.S. officials insisting that Israel sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or begin liquidating its own nuclear arsenal.

We, the people of the United States, are also aware that Iran as a signatory to the same Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) has the absolute legal right, as do all signatory countries, to develop a nuclear capability for civilian energy purposes.

Article IV of the Treaty states: “Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.”

As a side note, we are also aware that when your country was ruled by a monarch installed in power in 1953 as a consequence of a CIA led-coup against the then constitutional government in Iran, the policy of the U.S. government was to encourage the development of an Iranian nuclear program.

We hope that this letter enriches your understanding that the spirit and content of the Open Letter by 47 Republican Senators does not conform with the views and desires of a broad section of public opinion inside the United States.

Their real aim in scuttling and sabotaging the current negotiations between the United States and Iran, perhaps unprecedented in the form they have chosen, is to create more conflict including the danger of military action against Iran.

Be assured that the last thing the American people want is war with or against Iran.

— Add your name to these initial signers:

Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General • Cynthia McKinney, former Congresswoman • Brian Becker, ANSWER Coalition • Cindy Sheehan, peace activist • Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, Executive Director, Partnership for Civil Justice Fund • Heidi Boghosian, Esq., Constitutional Rights attorney • James Lafferty, Executive Director, National Lawyers Guild Los Angeles • Debra Sweet, Director, World Can’t Wait • Chuck Kauffman, National Co-Coordinator of Alliance for Global Justice • Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst • Eugene Puryear, Party for Socialism and Liberation • Medea Benjamin, co-founder, Code Pink • David Swanson, • Juan Jose Gutierrez, Vamos Unidos, USA • Malachy Kilbride, National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance • Imam Mahdi Bray, American Muslim Alliance • Phil Wilayto, author and editor, Virginia Defenders Newspaper • Don DeBar, Host, CPR News • Arturo Garcia, Alliance Philippines • Radhika Miller, Attorney, Washington, D.C. • Rev. Claudia de la Cruz, Rebel Diaz Arts Collective (RDACBX) • Kim Ives, Haiti Liberte • Benjamin N. Dictor, Attorney, New York, NY • John Beacham, ANSWER Chicago • Phil Portluck, • Preston Wood, ANSWER – LA • Kevin Zeese, • Mike Prysner, March Forward! • Barry Ladendorf, President, Veterans for Peace • Jeff Bigelow, labor organizer • Gloria La Riva, National Committee to Free the Cuban Five

Add your name to these initial signers

Related Topics:

An Iranian Leads the Coalition Assault on ISIS*

Reporter May be Jailed for Revealing the CIA Truth Behind Iran Plot*

U.S. Bishops Find Iran has No Nuclear Proliferation*

Playing with Iran to Alienate Russia and Destabilize Iran*

And One Ring to Bind Them All*

It Is Time for Iran to Tell the West ‘Goodbye’*

Iran: U.S.-Backed Terrorist Group Out to Make WWIII a Reality*

Obama Declares New Sanctions (Act Of War) Against Iran By Executive Order

Israelis Protest Against War on Iran

Remember Iraq -Think of Iran!

Looking for a False Flag to Start War on Iran!