Archive | March 18, 2015

Iran and Hezbollah Removed from U.S. Intel. Terrorist List*

Iran and Hezbollah Removed from U.S. Intel. Terrorist List*

By Gordon Duff

An annual report delivered recently to the US Senate by James Clapper, the director of National Intelligence, removed Iran and Hezbollah from its list of terrorism threats, after years in which they featured in similar reports.

The unclassified version of the Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Communities, dated February 26, 2015 (PDF), noted Iran’s efforts to combat Sunni extremists, including those of the ultra-radical Islamic State group, who were perceived to constitute the preeminent terrorist threat to American interests worldwide.

In describing Iran’s regional role, the report noted the Islamic Republic’s “intentions to dampen sectarianism, build responsive partners, and deescalate tensions with Saudi Arabia,” but cautioned that “Iranian leaders—particularly within the security services—are pursuing policies with negative secondary consequences for regional stability and potentially for Iran.

“Iran’s actions to protect and empower Shia communities are fuelling growing fears and sectarian responses,” it said.

The United States and other Western nations, along with a coalition of regional allies, both Sunni and Shiite has been launching attacks against Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria in recent months. The Sunni group, also known by its acronyms IS, ISIS and ISIL, is an offshoot of al-Qaeda that has carved out a self-proclaimed caliphate across large swaths of Syria and Iraq, both of whose governments are allied with Iran’s.

The Shiite Lebanese group Hezbollah, which is funded and mentored by Tehran, has been fighting the Islamic State, independently of the American-led campaign, both in Syria and Iraq.

Meanwhile, the US has been engaged in marathon talks with Iran in an effort to reach an agreement on its nuclear program. Tehran, according to the National Intelligence threat assessment, has “overarching strategic goals of enhancing its security, prestige, and regional influence [that] have led it to pursue capabilities to meet its civilian goals and give it the ability to build missile-deliverable nuclear weapons, if it chooses to do so.”

The report said that it was unclear whether or not Iran would eventually decide to build nuclear weapons, but noted that should the Iranian government decide to pursue such a course, it would face no “insurmountable technical barriers to producing a nuclear weapon.” It lingered on Iran’s pursuit of intercontinental ballistic missile technology as a likely delivery system for a nuclear weapon, and delineated Iranian threats in the realms of counterintelligence and cyber warfare.

According to one Israeli think tank, the removal of Iran and its proxy Hezbollah from the list of terror threats, where they featured in previous years, was directly linked to the campaign against ISIS.

“We believe that this results from a combination of diplomatic interests (the United States’ talks with Iran about a nuclear deal) with the idea that Iran could assist in the battle against the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq and maybe even in the battle against jihadist terrorism in other countries,” the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center said in an analysis of the report (Hebrew PDF). It also noted the Iran and Hezbollah were both listed as terrorism threats in the assessment of another American body, the Defense Intelligence Agency.

“Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) and Lebanese Hezbollah are instruments of Iran’s foreign policy and its ability to project power in Iraq, Syria, and beyond,” that assessment, also submitted to the Senate of February 26, said in its section on terrorism. “Hezbollah continues to support the Syrian regime, pro-regime militants and Iraqi Shia militants in Syria. Hezbollah trainers and advisors in Iraq assist Iranian and Iraqi Shia militias fighting Sunni extremists there. Select Iraqi Shia militant groups also warned of their willingness to fight US forces returning to Iraq.”

Israel, as well as Sunni allies of the US, has often warned that Iran, through Hezbollah and other proxies, has been sowing instability in the region. An escalating dispute between Jerusalem and Washington over the terms of an eventual agreement on Iran’s nuclear program has seen Israeli official rail against the relatively conciliatory tone adopted by US officials toward Iran, in light of the shared interest in combating the Islamic State.

In a polarizing speech before a joint session of Congress on March 3, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought to persuade American lawmakers of the folly of signing an agreement with Iran, and, comparing its leaders to those of the Nazi regime of World War II, cautioned that it “poses a grave threat, not only to Israel, but also [to] the peace of the entire world.”

Iran has made bellicose statements toward Israel, threatening to destroy the Jewish state, often citing Israeli talk of attacking its nuclear facilities, which it maintains are for peaceful purposes.

Hezbollah, which is based to Israel’s north in Lebanon and the Syrian Golan Heights, has largely refrained from attacking Israeli targets since the bloody Second Lebanon War of 2006, although there have been skirmishes along the border.

In one recent confrontation, Israel struck first, purportedly destroying a Hezbollah unit near the front line of the Golan Heights. Among the seven dead on January 18 were an Iranian general, a top Hezbollah commander and the son of another former commander in chief. Some two weeks later, Hezbollah took revenge, killing two Israeli soldiers and wounding seven in a cross-border attack.


Related Topics:

An Iranian Leads the Coalition Assault on ISIS*

Iraq: The Battle for Tikrit*

Open Letter to the People of Iran from the People of the United States*

It Is Time for Iran to Tell the West ‘Goodbye’*

St. Patrick’s Day*

St. Patrick’s Day*

The Irish Holocaust

By Gary Boyle

In The Secret History of the World, my Irish ancestors, the Celts, are described as:

…proud, imaginative, artistic, lovers of freedom and adventure, eloquence, poetry and the arts… and were VERY suspicious of any kind of centralized ‘authority’.

Most knowledgeable among them were the Druids, who placed great value in living harmoniously with nature, in developing memory-based records, and who adhered to the principles of the ‘Third Force’ – simply put, there is good, bad and the specific situation that determines which is which’.

When I was younger I never really saw the relevance of history. It had no meaning in my life – no place in my ‘history’. It was interesting to some extent, but I failed to appreciate its importance. What does the oft-quoted saying, ‘those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it’, actually mean? If we reflect on our own personal histories, we see that we learn our most important life lessons from making mistakes that invariably produce suffering, for ourselves and others. Yet how many times do we, or did we, keep making the same mistakes?

Sometimes we suppress painful episodes, but they can ‘come back to haunt us’ and negatively affect our present health. Gabor Mate explores this mind-body connection in When the Body Says No, which provides transformative insights into how disease can be the body′s way of saying ‘No!’ to what the conscious mind cannot or will not acknowledge. Regardless of what country we hail from, access to our true national history may enable us to learn, and therefore heal, collective wounds on this larger scale.

Historical Revisionism

In a wider context, knowledge of our national, planetary and perhaps even cosmic history is important for us to gain understanding of “ourselves and our wider environment,” as Lobaczewski put it. I recently listened to this SOTT Radio show: ‘Behind the headlines: Historical Revisionism in the 20th and 21st centuries‘, which reminded me of an episode of modern Irish history that I was never taught when attending school in Ireland, namely the 1845-1850 Irish Holocaust, or the ‘Great Famine’ (Irish potato famine), as it is still euphemistically termed.

Before I get into that, what is Historical Revisionism? According to Wikipedia it is:

…either the legitimate scholastic re-examination of existing knowledge about a historical event, or the illegitimate distortion of the historical record.

The latter is also sometimes called negationism. There are various techniques used to enable this distortion of history, mostly that of deception and denial:

The specific techniques of historical revisionism vary from using forged documents as genuine sources (or inventing reasons to distrust genuine documents), to exploiting opinions by taking them out of their historical context. Other techniques include manipulating statistical series to support the given point of view, and deliberately mis-translating texts into other languages. Instead of submitting their work to peer review, revisionists rewrite history to support an agenda, and often use fallacies to obtain the desired results. Because historical revisionism can be used to deny, deceive, or influence explanations and perceptions, it can be regarded as a technique of propaganda. Finally, techniques of historical revisionism operate within the intellectual battle-space in order to advance an interpretation or perception of history.

The Great Famine myth – or Irish Holocaust

What I was taught, and what my nephews in Ireland are learning nowadays, is that the Great Famine (Irish: an Gorta Mór) was fundamentally caused by dependency on the potato crop, which was decimated with blight – a natural phenomenon:

…a period of mass starvation, disease and emigration in Ireland between 1845 and 1852. It is sometimes referred to, mostly outside Ireland, as the Irish Potato Famine because about two-fifths of the population was solely reliant on this cheap crop for a number of historical reasons. During the famine approximately 1 million people died and a million more emigrated from Ireland, causing the island’s population to fall by between 20% and 25%.

A prominent Irish author and journalist, Tim Pat Coogan, explores this shameful chapter in Ireland’s rich history in his book The Famine Plot: England’s Role in Ireland’s Greatest Tragedy. In the final chapter, he recalls the xenophobic images and words commonly used to caricature the Irish in Victorian England. Colonial Administrator (and obvious psychopath) Charles Trevelyan, and other architects of the ‘famine response’, had a direct hand in filling the newspapers with the “oft-repeated theme that the famine was the result of a flaw in the Irish character.” And Punch, an English ‘satirical’ magazine, regularly portrayed “‘Paddy’ as a simian in a tailcoat and a derby, engaged in plotting murder, battening on the labour of the English workingman, and generally living a life of indolent treason,” explains Mr Coogan. The result of such dehumanising propaganda was to make unreasonable policy seem reasonable and just – historical revisionism in action!

Indeed, anti-Irish racism and anti-Catholic discrimination were an inherent part of British colonial rule in Ireland. Parallels can be drawn between Punch‘s so-called ‘satirical’ cartoons and today’s racist ‘Charlie Hebdo‘ publication. A distinct correlation can be seen between the treatment of the Irish under Victorian rule and the treatment of Muslims in modern-day France, or Britain (or just about everywhere, it seems, as Islamophobia is on the rise all over). Just to clarify, real satire is a humorous look at prevailing social injustices – highlighting, through ironic or sarcastic means – actions of the societal ‘establishment’ or elite; it is NOT a tool of racist or sexist propagandists and it is NOT the denigration of those marginialised by society. There will always be apologists though for these sadistic expressions, masked as ‘satire’ and defended with ‘freedom of expression at all costs’, as reported by Norman Finkelstein in ‘Charlie Hebdo is sadism not satire‘.

The official narrative of those dark days in 19th century Ireland could be summed up in these words from Punch and the Great Famine by Peter Gray:

Like Sir Charles Trevelyan, the assistant Secretary to the Treasury, Punch regarded the continuation of famine conditions in Ireland after this time as entirely due to indigenous moral and not biological failures. Ireland had been warned of the folly of potato dependence by a ‘natural’ disaster, but had perversely chosen to ignore the danger; no further responsibility could be undertaken by the ‘imperial’ government.

“The Pig and the Peer”. This cartoon shows a life-size pig with an Irish accent pleading with the English Prime Minister. During the Famine thousands of Irish peasants were evicted to make way for animals that could “pay rent”.

It was not blighted potatoes that caused the Irish genocide of 150 years ago. Yes, there was potato blight at the time. It struck harvests in the autumn of 1845, and had begun in North Carolina, then spread throughout the Northern Hemisphere for several years – yet it did not cause famine or mass death anywhere, except in Ireland. Why was that?

Nor were potatoes the only major produce of Irish agriculture at the time; they were just the only produce which the Irish – 75% of whom were feudal tenants of mostly tyrannical British landlords, fanatical preachers of ‘free trade’ – were allowed to eat or to feed to their livestock! As the historian Arthur Young wrote, the Irish tenant farmers were, like so many others, effectively slaves.

“A landlord in Ireland can scarcely invent an order which a labourer, servant, or cottier [tenant farmer] dares to refuse… He may punish with his cane or his horsewhip with the most perfect security. A poor man would have his bones broken if he offered to lift a hand in his own defense.”

‘Free trade’ decreed that no government surplus food – no ‘welfare’ – be given to the starving, in order to leave the market for food undisturbed. We do not propose,” Prime Minister Lord John Russell told the House of Commons, “to interfere with the regular mode by which Indian corn and other kinds of grain may be brought into Ireland.”

Essentially, ‘free trade’ gave Irish farm families three choices when the potato crops failed:

  • starve on their farms, while selling their grain crops to pay their rent
  • report to the Public Works or the Poor Law workhouses to be worked/starved to death (as the Nazis did to the inmates of Auschwitz)
  • emigrate and take the 50/50 chance of surviving the passage across the Atlantic.

According to the definitions of the Geneva Convention, what happened in Ireland between 1845-50 was Genocide. During those ‘potato famine years’ – food was systematically removed from the shores of Ireland, a policy conducted in full awareness that it was starving the population. The result was a million deaths, with two million more emigrating.

The Choctaw Indians donated to Irish famine sufferers in 1847.

Ireland starved because its food, from 40 to 70 shiploads per day, was removed at gunpoint by 12,000 British constables reinforced by the British militia, battleships, excise vessels, Coast Guard and by 200,000 British soldiers (100,000 at any given moment) The attached map shows the never-before-published names and locations in Ireland of the food removal regiments (Disposition of the Army; Public Record Office, London; et al, of which we possess photocopies). Thus, Britain seized from Ireland’s producers tens of millions of head of livestock; tens of millions of tons of flour, grains, meat, poultry and dairy products; enough to sustain 18 million persons.

At the time, the population of Ireland was about 8 million.

In other words, the history still being taught to Irish children is a gross distortion of the facts. In a letter he wrote to an Irish peer – the 1st Baron Monteagle of Brandon, a former Chancellor of the Exchequer – Charles Trevelyan described the famine as an “effective mechanism for reducing surplus population” as well as “the judgement of God“. In recent years, former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright expressed similarly unconscionable sentiments regarding the economic siege of Iraq in the 1990s. Here’s another quote that embodies the psychopathic nature of Trevelyan, and the British Government he represented:

British Coastguard Inspector-General, Sir James Dombrain, when he saw starving paupers, ordered his subordinates to give free food handouts. For his attempts to feed the starving, Dombrain was publicly rebuked by Trevelyan…”

The Trevelyan quote is: “The real evil with which we have to contend is not the physical evil of the Famine but the moral evil of the selfish, perverse and turbulent character of the people.”

This tragedy is beautifully captured in the Irish folk ballad, The Fields of Athenry, with its painful, haunting lyrics eloquently expressing those terrible times:

Emigration – the ‘coffin ships’

Emigration was thus a desperate necessity. On some of the ‘coffin ships’ the death rate was 30% or more. Besides overcrowding, starvation and disease, the dangers included, for those attempting to use the Liverpool route, unscrupulous middlemen and landlords, thieves, con men, and the extortionate tactics of ships’ agents and owners. Exactly the same despicable tactics being used by ‘people traffickers’ of desperate people these days. Still, with the only other alternative being a slow death at home, hundreds of thousands faced, and largely overcame, these horrifying obstacles.

These days in our morally bankrupt Europe Union, people continue to flee from oppression and starvation. According to refugee organizations’ estimates, since 1990 something in the region of 25,000 people have drowned while attempting to cross the Mediterranean to Europe. Since the Lampedusa migrant deaths of 2013, when hundreds drowned, thousands more desperate people have been rescued from these latter day versions of the ‘coffin ships’, then often detained in conditions amounting to a ‘living hell‘. Britain’s Home Office estimates that some 30,000 migrants and asylum seekers are detained indefinitely in the country while their immigration status is ‘resolved’, with many being held for months or even years. The immigration removal centers in the UK have been described as ‘proper prisons’, with lack of medical care, routine physical abuse, and illegal indefinite detentions. Ireland today, still suffering the demise of its economy as the ‘Celtic Tiger’ was fattened then slaughtered by the same imperialist mindset that caused the famine, is undergoing another mass emigration, with as many as 400,000 people having left Irish shores since 2008… from a population of just over 4.5 million.

The theme of emigration is well represented in this song by The Pogues – Thousands Are Sailing – with lyrics here.

Learning from history

Is it really any wonder that the same human rights abuses continue today when such horrific acts of genocide have been excised from the history books and the knowledge of them denied even to the descendants of those who suffered so terribly? It’s an appalling travesty. Until we research objectively, uncover these horrific lies, and demand their inclusion in mainstream history books and the school curriculum – learn the lessons of history, in other words – absolutely nothing will change. We will continue to see the same agendas play out, just on a slightly different stage.

Perhaps this St Patrick’s Day we can make a concerted effort to pass on knowledge of this despicable period in Irish history, sign the petition ‘WHEN GENOCIDE BECAME ‘FAMINE’: IRELAND, 1845 – 1850‘, and celebrate those ‘Celtic qualities’ we may have forgotten or lost, but which we have in common with other ‘tribes‘ worldwide. Perhaps this St Patrick’s Day we can remember our shared suffering with all humanity – whatever their nationality, creed or colour – under the Global Pathocracy‘s relentless war against the weak.

“Our modern civilization suffers from amnesia. The psychopathic elites have stolen our heritage: the wisdom of our ancestors who knew about the cyclical nature of cosmic events and the role played by corruption in those catastrophes.”

Only Our Rivers Run Free is a song written by Mickey MacConnell about the constitutional status of Northern Ireland. I feel the lyrics are relevant everywhere in this world though, as the “cold chains of bondage” take many different forms, perhaps the strongest being those that remain unseen because people do not know their true history.

Only our rivers run free

When apples still grow in November
When Blossoms still bloom from each tree
When leaves are still green in December
It’s then that our land will be free
I wander her hills and her valleys
And still through my sorrow I see
A land that has never known freedom
And only her rivers run free

I drink to the death of her manhood
Those men who’d rather have died
Than to live in the cold chains of bondage
To bring back their rights were denied
Oh where are you now when we need you
What burns where the flame used to be
Are ye gone like the snows of last winter
And will only our rivers run free?

How sweet is life but we’re crying
How mellow the wine but it’s dry
How fragrant the rose but it’s dying
How gentle the breeze but it sighs
What good is in youth when it’s aging
What joy is in eyes that can’t see
When there’s sorrow in sunshine and flowers
And still only our rivers run free


Related Topics:

Irish Republic Was Hijacked By Elites after Partition*

The Slavish Past of the Irish*

From a Conscious Musician to a MKUltra Slave

‘I’ for Iceland and Now Ireland Collaring the Real Criminals, the Banksters*

IMF and EU Taking Ireland for Everything it’s Got*

Ireland Removing the Right to Live in the Countryside*

Irish Shops Urged to Remove Produce from Israel*

‘We Won’t Pay’ say Thousands of Irish to Water Privatization*

Germany, where’s the Reparation for Greece?*

Germany, where’s the Reparation for Greece?*

Greece should be financially compensated by Germany for war crimes committed during the Nazi occupation of the country between 1940 and 1944, according to Germany’s Social Democratic Party.

Around 250,000 people died during the occupation, with many having starved to death.

In an interview with German news magazine Der Spiegel, Gesine Schwan, chairwoman of the Social Democratic Party values committee, said “It’s about recognising the fact that we committed a serious injustice in Greece“.

The relationship between Germany and Greece has been under intense strain since the beginning of the Eurozone crisis, with Germany as its major creditor following the bailout in 2010.

However, SDPs deputy chair Ralf Stegner said

“We should hold a discussion about reparations. We shouldn’t connect the matter of reparations with the current debate about the euro crisis”.

For the last 25 years, Berlin has stipulated that the case for reparation for Greece is “closed”, despite requests from the Greek government that the compensation be used to help pay off the country’s debt.

In retribution for the Cretan resistance, the Nazis razed the village of Kondanos and erected a sign: ”Here stood Kandanos, destroyed in retribution for the murder of 25 German soldiers, never to be rebuilt again.” The town was indeed rebuilt.

In 1960, Berlin paid 115 million Deutschmarks (€58 million) to Athens in compensation for the Nazi occupation of Greece during the Second World War. However Greece says the deal made in 1960 did not cover the damage to infrastructure, war crimes and the return of a forced loan exacted from Nazi occupied Greece.

Green’s parliamentary leader Anton Hofreiter told Spiegel:

“Germany can’t just sweep the demands of Greece off the table. Morally and legally, this chapter is far from complete.”

But according to Merkel’s spokesman Steffan Seifert:

“It is our firm belief that questions of reparations and compensation have been legally and politically resolved”.

It’s estimated that Athens could be demanding €108 billion for destroyed infrastructure and €54 billion for the forced loan.

Meanwhile during a speech at the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schauble said:

“They won’t get their debts paid by conjuring up German obligations from World War II.”

He said that trust in the Greek government had been “destroyed”, adding that Athens wasn’t being honest with its citizens by placing the blame for the country’s debt crisis on Brussels, Berlin and the rest of Europe.

According to Guillermo Medina, a Spanish journalist and former Member of Parliament:

“The negotiations between Greece and its European partners mark a milestone in the political tussle in the European Union since the reunification of Germany in 1990, between moving towards a Europeanised Germany or a Germanised Europe”.

Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras is due to travel to Berlin for talks with Angela Merkel next week and scheduled to be hosted by Russian President Vladimir Putin in May.


Related Topics:

Greece’s New Left Government Better be Prepared for a Battle with the Oligarchy*

Re-writing European History for the Classroom*

Debt-ocracy: Enslaving Entire Nations and Peoples*

Unpaid Debts: Reparation For Colonialism*

Ukraine Snapped up by the Rothschilds*

Ukraine Snapped up by the Rothschilds*

By Valentin Katasonov

A group of large international investors buy out Ukrainian government’s securities. Franklin Templton is one of them. The investment group snapped up Ukrainian international debt with a face value of almost $5 billion at the end of August, nearly a fifth of the country’s outstanding international government bonds.

Franklin Templton has all the makings of a «financial vulture». Until now the sum paid by it for 20% of Ukraine’s national debt remains to be a commercial secret. The vultures purchase the securities with low, almost junk, ratings at low prices to demand full payment from issuer afterwards. Argentina is a good example of vultures’ destructive activities. The country made a deal on restructuring with 95-97% of debt holders but the rest happened to be in the hands of financial vultures that spoiled it all by demanding full payment. The vultures (two US investment funds) started court proceedings to make Argentina default. The country may be mercilessly pillaged in case it complies with the ultimatums of vultures and the ruling of US court.

The story is a warning to Ukraine which has sold its securities to Franklin Templton. According to a recent Bloomberg report, the investment fund acts under US jurisdiction and is controlled by Rothschilds, the family known for its death grip.

Last year I wrote in my article The Financial Situation of Kiev Regime and Prospects for Ukraine’s Default that Ukraine may face the very same default that «will never come» according the assurances provided by Ukraine’s Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk. Some may lose billions, some may acquire unprecedented wealth. As the global experience shows, defaults are seldom impromptu. Normally they are planned. Sometimes the preparations may last for a few years. Ukraine is not an exclusion. It will default on its debts. The time will be defined by sponsors and modest beneficiaries of such organizations as Franklin Thompson. At the moment of writing the article I did not know their names. Now they have come into the open. It’s a sign that the drama is nearing its denouement.

The Rothschilds family has come up with an initiative to create a group of Ukrainian bonds holders to shape a common policy on debt settlement. Rothschild & Cie Banque, a French bank belonging to Rothschild Group, offered its service in the capacity of «go-between» in the talks of Ukraine’s Ministry of Finances and creditors on restructuring the debt. Now creditors are waiting for Kiev to put forward the proposals in mid-March, according to Giovanni Salvetti, Co-head of Russia and CIS at Rothschild Inc., who handles central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Salvetti said there were two opinions among creditors about setting up the committee: those who want to wait and see what the government will say and those who want to set «some hard lines for the potential restructuring, like saying we’re looking for a proposal but be aware that we are not ready to accept X, Y, Z.»

The Bloomberg’s information is not detailed but it allows to make the following conclusions: first, the default of Ukraine is inevitable and the credit holders are aware of this fact, second, the default will be accompanied by restructuring on tough terms unfavourable for Ukraine.

One detail strikes an eye – the leak on the coming default and debt restructuring coincided with the announcement made by the International Monetary Fund that on March 11 it signed off on an USD17.5 billion loan for cash-strapped Ukraine to keep its economy afloat. The IMF loan is spread over four years within the framework of stabilization program. The coincidence may be interpreted in different ways.

Version one. There is no coordination between the International Monetary Fund and the Rothschild group; they vie for the control over the Ukraine’s economy.

Version two. It’s not a «genuine» decision» of the International Monetary Fund but rather a PR-action taken to prevent the further falling of Ukraine’s investment and credit rating.

Version three. The decision is «genuine». Ukraine will get the money but not for some ephemeral «program of economic stabilization». The purpose is to guarantee that Franklin Templeton and other financial marauders acting under the disguise of respectable «investment funds» get full payment on Ukraine’s securities. If so, the Rothschilds and the International Monetary Fund do effectively coordinate their activities.

The security holders are confident in inevitability of Ukraine’s default. In this case the country will be ruled by duumvirate of US government and world financial oligarchy on the basis of the agreement on debt restructuring to be signed in Kiev with the Rothchilds.

It can be presumed, that the agreement will confirm the consent of Ukraine’s government on complete privatization of the country, including the rest of state industrial property, land and natural resources. Franklin Templton and other structures belonging to the Rothchilds will gain.

Andrey Fursov, a Russian sociologist, historian and writer and publicist (author of several books on modern history), believes that the Rothchilds are invisibly present in all Ukraine’s regions, including the eastern part of the country, and sectors of economy. The prime mission is to establish its control over the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (province) of central Ukraine where Rothchilds Europe Bank and Rothchilds -controlled Royal Dutch Shell already operate. It can be called a Rothchilds legal intelligence gathering station. Experts believe that that the illegal representation is much more effective to include many Rothchilds -controlled individuals and companies. Actually the implementation of the program of Ukraine’s sovereign debt restructuring will be based on the data received from Rothchilds legal and illegal spy stations in Ukraine.

It’s all not that easy. The Rockefellers have a foothold in the west of Ukraine, the country where they pursue their own goals too. The both groups try to divide the spheres of interests but they cannot do it without bickering. For instance, many experts believe that tycoon Dmitry Firtash is the chief representative of Rothchilds in Ukraine. His removal from the scene is attributed to the Rockefellers who effectively use the administrative potential of Washington in Kiev. The emerging duumvirate in Ukraine and the coming default make the situation in Ukraine less predictable.


Related Topics:

Poroshenko Talking Peace but Preparing for War backed by 11 E.U. Countries*

Rothschild Becomes Sole Owner of Semiconductor Patent as Four Co-owners Went Down with Malaysia Airlines MH370*

And One Ring to Bind Them All*

Debt-ocracy: Enslaving Entire Nations and Peoples*

Rothschilds, The Crown & Nugan Hand Bank

City of London’s Imperialist Designs on Russia

Rothschild’s Summit Fine-tuning Capitalism into Global Economic Tyranny*