Archive | May 14, 2015

Correa Warns Brad Pitt against Participating in a ‘Farce’ of Pro-Chevron Film*

Correa Warns Brad Pitt against Participating in a ‘Farce’ of Pro-Chevron Film*

The South American president reiterated his call for the actor to visit the country and hear from the victims of the ecological disaster.

Brad Pitt visited areas contaminated by the Chevron oil company in April 2012. | Photo: El Telegrafo

Brad Pitt visited areas contaminated by the Chevron oil company in April 2012. | Photo: El Telegrafo

Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa once again issued an invite renowned actor and producer Brad Pitt to visit the South American country. Correa’s repeat invitation came after reports that Pitt’s production company bought the rights to a book that aims to sow doubt about Ecuador’s efforts to have an oil firm pay for damage left by its operations in the Amazon.

“I am certain that when he knows the truth he is going to object to participating in that farce, where Chevron is the victim and the (real) victims are the victimizers,” Correa said at a Wednesday meeting with press, where the leader said the book “distorted the truth,” and reiterated his plea to the actor to not develop a movie from the screenplay.

Correa initially issued the invite to the U.S. actor on his weekly television May 2, challenging Pitt to witness the contamination left by the oil giant in the Ecuadorean rainforest.

News outlets reported in April that Pitt had purchased the movie rights to Paul Barrett’s 2014 book “The Law of the Jungle.” The book presents Ecuador’s case for justice in a highly unfavourable light. It focuses on a character assassination of U.S. lawyer Steven Donziger, who has relentlessly pursued justice in the case of Chevron’s toxic legacy in the Amazon.

Ecuador’s environmental Disaster courtesy of Texaco-Chevron

“We invite (Brad Pitt) to dip his hand (in the contaminated soil). We’ll see if he continues with this movie project, which would be the biggest act of dishonesty,” said President Correa.

Correa also denounced Chevron’s campaign to “discredit the Ecuadorean justice system.” The oil company has argued that an Ecuadorean court’s ruling, confirmed by the country’s Supreme Court, against Chevron was obtained through fraud, an argument also made by Barrett’s book.

“Surely Brad Pitt does not know what he is getting involved with, in the complicity he is falling victim to,” said Correa.

Pitt’s involvement with this movie project raised some eyebrows as he and his wife, actor Angelina Jolie, are known for supporting humanitarian and environmental causes.

Correa mentioned having met Angelina Jolie and praised her humanitarian work. Jolie, who visited Ecuador on a number of occasions to meet with Colombian refugees as part of her work as a U.N. Goodwill Ambassador, commended the work of the Ecuadorean state in support of refugees.

Pitt and Jolie visited Ecuador together in April 2012 and visited the areas contaminated by the Chevron oil company. Pitt was even photographed inspecting the contamination near Lago Agrio.

Oil Giant Texaco — which merged with Chevron in 2001 — was ordered to pay US$9.5 billion by the Ecuadorean Supreme Court for its role in what has been called one of the world’s greatest environmental disasters as a result of its oil exploration in the Ecuadorean Amazon between the years 1964 and 1990.

Source*

Criminal Charges were made against Chevron over Brazil oil spill

Related Topics:

Oil vs. Communities: The Case of Ecuador

Shell, Chevron and Glencore on Trial for Global Human Rights Abuses*

Chevron and Exxon: The Criminals Behind Katrina*

Brad Pitt Helping to Make It Right for Katrina Survivors

The ICC for Chevron’s Crimes against Humanity*

NWO Ambassador: Angela Jolie on Syria*

Advertisements

Propaganda in Homework: A Parent’s Response*

Propaganda in Homework: A Parent’s Response*

By Heather Callaghan

A reader sent us an actual homework assignment from an unspecified elementary grade (below). It’s titled “Medicine” and coerces the young mind to believe that vaccines (and prescription drugs) are the main route to overall health, if not the only route. That without them, there would be a gaping lack of health – a vaccine deficiency?

Sadly, this is not for Health Class! Like so many other assignments we’ve seen, this is for a staple class (the three Rs) but produces propaganda about an unrelated topic. We’ve seen this happen for math classes in story problems. In the upper right corner is the word “comprehension” indicating that this is from Reading class. The sheet is copyrighted 1995.

The parent, however, would have none of it. Not only did she cross out the entire assignment with a large X, epic on its own, but left a response that didn’t pull punches.

Here is the assignment and the parent’s response typed below:

The explanatory paragraph mixes the idea of vaccines as part of a healthy lifestyle, falsely claiming that by taking them, you’ll never contract measles, mumps and other illnesses. Unfortunately, it is the vaccinated that are getting hit the hardest with disease spikes like measles and whooping cough and like the fox with its tail cut off are encouraged by the media to blame others for not having their tails removed too.

In question #4, “A word that means ‘medicine that keeps you healthy is‘” – the child is forced to select a. for  “vaccine.”

At the end is an open-ended question to determine if the child will explain the guided response that vaccines are the equivalent to taking care of yourself and will prevent disease. It’s only a comprehension assignment in that the child is meant only to comprehend vaccine propaganda and medical dogma and be able to repeat the program back to an authority.

The parent’s epic response stands up for medical autonomy and reminds the teacher of age-appropriate topics and privacy:

“Please send home work! I have decided to not have —- do this homework and will ask to not have her do school or home work on drugs and shots!!”

This is a serious and complicated issue that should be between [her] parents and her healthcare provider. At her age, she cannot make informed decisions about the risks.

This appears to be propaganda!

Thank you.

That’s just it – this inappropriate assignment is making the decision for the child outside of the family life and even the course provided by their healthcare providers. But with no talk of risks. A unilateral decision about medicine in what appears to be a Reading class. Drug corporations do not have a place in children’s classrooms.

If children are brainwashed to believe that vaccines are a necessary part of health – they’ll never flinch at the idea of forced injections. They’ll never question the increase of new vaccines in the pipeline ready to have forced subjects. Or ponder that global corporations like Merck and cowardly, money-grubbing politicians do not have public health in mind…

Source*

Related Topics:

Scottish Primary School Kids Given Terrorism Homework*

Student Made to Fail because he Didn’t Promote the NWO Climate Change Myth*

Re-writing European History for the Classroom*

Common Core Curriculum: Satanism in our Schools*

Thousands of Kids Stay Home In Protest against Ontario’s Sex-Ed*

180,000 Italians Say No to Gender Theory and Sex Education*

$63 Million to Brain-Damaged Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine*

 

Education Beyond Brainwashing*

Eugenics of the UN, WHO and World Bank in Mexico*

Eugenics of the UN, WHO and World Bank in Mexico*

By Aaron and Melissa Dykes

You could say the idea of the so-called “Population Bomb” may have actually exploded in 1974.

That was the year of the first World Population Conference in Bucharest. Effects of the 1973 oil crisis were being felt hard, with the price of oil quadrupled from $3 to nearly $12 a barrel. Oh, and speaking of war criminal Henry Kissinger, ’74 was also the year of his infamous National Security Study Memorandum 200, which listed the “population problem” of unchecked growth in “LDCs” (less developed countries) as a potential risk to U.S. national security.

The document is dated April 24, 1974.

Concentration on this “problem” of how to reduce the population was planned for 13 key countries, including India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia. Of those, the document singled out Mexico as having one of the highest (and therefore, most worrisome) growth rates of all. The document read,

“Perhaps the most significant population trend from the viewpoint of the United States is the prospect that Mexico’s population will increase from 50 million in 1970 to over 130 million by the year 2000.”

The newspapers had been sounding the alarm about Mexico’s population bomb in the years leading up to 1974.

Note that Mexico resisted population control policies, but the World Bank “insisted the country do something to cut down its population growth.”

One of the strategies of NSSM 200 included,

“Can technological innovations or development reduce growth or ameliorate its effects?”

…technological innovations?

Perhaps that’s why a group of people decided to forcibly sterilize groups of Mexican children against their will and parents wishes in December 1974 with a novel anti-fertility vaccine.

A few small news clippings about the incident hit American papers between December 11 – 13, usually buried in a tiny corner of a page somewhere in the middle of the paper.

Key points from these clippings:

  • A group of white robed men and women “who looked like foreigners” disguised as inoculation teams showed up at schools and gave shots that reportedly sterilized Mexican school children. Reports were that the teams specifically targeted poor kids.
  • One television network claimed the people were “orientals,” but another source who called in claimed the teams were made up of American doctors and nurses. The teams reportedly had police escorts when they showed up at the schools.
  • Inoculation at a Mexican school would have raised quite a few alarm bells because, although the country routinely held vaccination drives, they were never held at schools.
  • The “rumours” began in the north in Nuevo Leon, then the south in Chiapas and then moved to Mexico City, where thousands of angry parents “in slum areas” stormed and barricaded schools, and removed their children from them. Thousands of parents. Some 35-40% of elementary kids were absent Wednesday of that week.
  • According to the National Action party, “The rare vaccine, until now never used, much less as part of a campaign which appears to cover many parts of the republic, is given to each child in three places: the umbilicis, the chest, and the spinal column.”
  • Manual Stephens Garcia of the Popular Socialist Party blamed “the right wing, the multinational corporations, and the Central Intelligence Agency.”
  • The government broadcast denial of the “rumours” and ran front-page newspaper stories to “calm the fears.”

A “rare vaccine” that was never used until then?

It would seem this “rumour” had quite a few very specific details, didn’t it?

While the papers spun this story and attempted to chalk it all up to falsehoods and fear-mongering based on the next political race, it was two years off at that point. Would thousands of parents really storm schools throughout Mexico City barring the doors and yanking their kids out just based on mere (highly specific) rumour alone without any facts whatsoever to back it up?

Remember, this is a time well before social media and cell phones.

Sadly, there are reasons aside from NSSM 200 that make this story more believable as fact than fiction, and it involves the usual depopulation suspects.

By 1974, newspapers were proclaiming that sterilization itself was socially acceptable as “just a form of birth control.”

Coercive sterilizations under the banner of “family planning” were taking place all over the globe that year. The U.S. government was also exposed for having funded sterilizations on minorities, poor women, people who were mentally ill, deaf or blind, those with Epilepsy and others who were considered “unfit,” to have babies. This even included little kids who it was deemed should never have children of their own. In April 1974, it came to light in the papers that the government had sterilized of some 1,204 girls and boys all under the age of 21 at federally funded clinics across the country. These figures included a ten year old, an eleven year old, and ten 13 year olds. Making sure people couldn’t readily reproduce and propagandizing infertility as an Earth saving measure in the face of (artificial) scarcity was the order of the day. And that’s how the government [treats] its own people, let alone those in Kissinger’s 13 key countries as Mexico definitely was.

Just the year before in 1973, two researchers published work on an anti-fertility vaccine in the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology titled, “Effects of Immunization with Hapten-Coupled HCG on the Human Menstrual Cycle.” In the study, the doctors immunized women who had already been physically sterilized but still had ovaries with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), which lead to detectable anti-HCG antibodies in their systems — in essence, the vaccine made the women’s bodies attack the very hormone needed for a viable pregnancy. The researchers concluded,

“Practical use of active isoimmunization may prove of considerable value in the study of reproductive mechanisms and perhaps in fertility regulation in humans.” Studies on the use of antibodies to regulate fertility had been going on, however, for decades.

As we’ve previously reported at Truthstream, the Rockefeller Foundation had been quietly funding research on just such an anti-fertility vaccine since at least 1968 according to their own reports. In 1973, the foundation reported financial support for a number of population control studies (as it had every year for decades), but specifically including one at Colorado State University of the corpus luteum in ewes. The report states,

“Since the corpus luteum is a cyclic ovarian structure responsible for the early maintenance of pregnancy, the possibility of inhibiting its function by chemical or immunological agents holds great promise for fertility control.” [emphasis added]

However, the Rockefeller Foundation wasn’t the only organization working on an anti-fertility vaccine at the time.

In 1972, the United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, the World Health Organization and the World Bank got together and collaborated on the “Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)” with a goal to “coordinate, promote, conduct, and evaluate research in human reproduction.” The World Health Organization was the face on the research into producing an hCG-laced anti-fertility vaccine, actually specifically forming a Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation in guess what year? 1973.

Since the World Health Organization is the United Nations and the United Nations is Rockefeller, it’s all one big happy incestuous group with the same goal: world population reduction.

The same year the Rockefeller Foundation admitted his foundation was working on an anti-fertility vaccine, under the headline “‘Unemployed Rockefeller Crusades for Control of World Population” in the January 1, 1968 El Paso Herald-Post, John D. Rockefeller III was quoted as saying,

“There is no problem more important than population control. It is directly related to the matter of meaningful peace. Until you get this problem (of birth control) resolved, you can’t resolve the other problems. With the atomic bomb, we’re hoping that civilization will be strong enough to avoid it. With the population bomb, you see it coming down the road at you. You can’t avoid it. It’s just a matter of degree of seriousness in the tragedy that will result. Even if measures are taken now, it will still be a problem.”

As researcher Jurriaan Maessen noted, Rockfeller actually conceived the vaccine all the way back in the 1930s:

Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason, who acted as president in the mid-1930s, on multiple occasions expressed his master’s desire for an “anti-hormone” that would reduce fertility worldwide. Now keep in mind, this is more than 35 years before the Foundation actually mentioned funding “anti-fertility vaccines” in subsequent annual reports from 1969 onward.

Having travelled far beyond the realm of rumour and speculation, research into the admitted funding of anti-fertility vaccines has uncovered more and more sinister revelations along the way.

By the mid-1930s, Mason of the Rockefeller Foundation thought that “the ultimate solution of the problem [of birth control] may well lie in the studies of endocrinology, particularly anti-hormones.”

Many horror stories of this exact type of vaccine being administered to populations in developing countries without their knowledge have come out since.

As Jon Rappoport reported,

There were unconfirmed reports from the Philippines and Mexico that their 1993 tetanus vaccination programs—which were supposedly administered only to women of childbearing age—involved multiple injections.

Tetanus vaccine protocols indicate that one injection is good for ten years. Therefore, multiple injections would indicate another motive for the vaccinations—such as the anti-fertility effect of hCG planted in the vaccine.

More recently just this past November, we reported on similar stories of hCG-laced tetanus shots coming out of Kenya:

Over a million women and girls of childbearing age have been given a tetanus shot laced with an anti-fertility agent that will make them unable to get pregnant or cause miscarriages if they are pregnant.

The vaccination program was targeted only at women and girls of childbearing age who were required to take a whopping FIVE shots over the course of two years. Similar covert sterilization programs via the same tetanus vaccine have surfaced throughout other parts of the developing world, including Thailand, Mexico, Nicaragua, and the Philippines.

Even though Kenya’s Catholic bishops have sent six of these vaccine samples to two different independent labs which came back positive that the shots were laced with HCG — which will essentially make a woman create antibodies to their own pregnancy hormones — the Kenyan government has ignored the evidence and will continue to vaccinate another 1.3 million women (and somewhere over at the World Bank, horrible troll people bent on world domination and depopulation are high-fiving…)

The vaccine is sponsored by the World Health Organization and UNICEF, which is pretty telling considering that the WHO is one of the first organizations to create and test an infertility vaccine…

Five shots? Perhaps the technique has been perfected by now.

However, it would appear these anti-fertility vaccine horrors have been going on not just since the 1990s, but for four decades.

And it just keeps happening.

This is a crime against humanity.

Source*

Related Topics:

Eugenics: Kenya’s Catholic Bishops Charge U.N. for Sterilizing the Population*

Bishop Badejo: U.S. won’t fight Boko Haram because of their Eugenics Agenda in Africa*

Son of Cabal (Rockefeller) Dies, but not the Criminal Eugenic Agenda*

Gates Next Contribution to Eugenics*

American and British Taxes Paying for Eugenics in India*

Rockefellers Funded Eugenics Initiative to Sterilize 15 Million Americans*

Eugenics: Kidnapping of the Indigenous Sioux in South Dakota*

The WHO’s Private Vaccine Laboratory*

Australia, Forced Vaccines, and Ethnic Cleansing*

17 Year Old’s Life Ruined by the Gardasil Vaccine*

Infant Dies after 8 Vaccines, Family Gets Him Back from Hospital Cremated*

Unravelling the Myth of Overpopulation*

After Ukraine, Macedonia*

After Ukraine, Macedonia*

By Wayne Madsen

The diabolical plan to destabilize Macedonia by Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, the U.S. ambassador to Macedonia Jess Baily, and Macedonian «social democratic» opposition leaders Zoran Zaev and Branko Crvenkovski – who could be called the «Arseniy Yatsenyuk and Petro Poroshenko of Macedonia» – has entered a critical phase with members of the supposedly disbanded Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) increasing their terrorist border incursions on Macedonian territory from Kosovo.

The plan by the U.S. State Department and Macedonian stooges like Zaev and Crvenkovski is to create a situation where the democratically-elected government of Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski and President Georgy Ivanov is ousted in an uprising crafted by well-paid operatives for George Soros. The coup plotters, including those who have become known throughout Macedonia as «Sorosites,» hope to replace the independent-minded government of Macedonia with one that will cancel the Turkish Stream pipeline project that is designed to transport natural gas into central Europe from Russia via Turkey, Greece, Macedonia, Serbia, and Hungary; negotiate with Greece, the European Union and NATO to end the nation’s use of the name «Macedonia,» thus ensuring the fast-track entry of Macedonia into the EU and NATO; and satiate the desires of Albanian nationalists in Albania and Kosovo for Albanian-majority regions of Macedonia to be whittled away from the country and appended to a «Greater Albania.»

It is the rise of Albanian nationalist irredentism along the fragile Kosovo-Albanian border that poses the greatest threat to Macedonia’s political and territorial integrity.

The first signs of trouble along the border was an attack in April on a Macedonian police border post at Gošince by 40 armed men wearing the insignia of the allegedly outlawed KLA. That action came at the same time that Kosovo’s Foreign Minister, Hashim Thaci, the former leader of the KLA, defied threats by Serbian authorities to arrest him for terrorist charges brought in 2007 and visit Belgrade to attend a conference organized by «Sorosites.» The arrest of the Kosovo foreign minister would have set the stage for a NATO/EU confrontation with Serbia, another critical partner in not only the Turkish Stream pipeline but the Chinese-funded Balkan railway part of the Silk Road project that will link the Greek port of Piraeus to Budapest through Macedonia and Serbia.

On May 9, armed gunmen who had earlier crossed over from Kosovo and into Macedonia, were confronted in the northern border town of Kumanovo by Macedonian police in a counter-terrorism operation. A firefight broke out between the suspected KLA terrorists and the police. Six Macedonian police and an unknown number of the Albanian terrorists were killed in the ensuing battle.

The attack by the restored KLA on the Gošince Macedonian border post, where Macedonian police officers were held hostage before the Albanian raiders returned to Kosovo, and the most recent foray by the KLA into Kumanovo could not have been possible without the knowledge of Kosovo’s military protector, NATO, which operates its largest military base in Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo.

In 2001, when KLA forces, allied with Macedonian Albanian nationalists of the National Liberation Army (NLA) of Macedonia, fought Macedonian government forces in the town of Aračinovo in Macedonia, forces of the U.S. private military firm, Military Professional Resources, Inc. (MPRI), were involved with both sides. MPRI was assisting the NLA while also advising the Macedonian army. It is believed that MPRI had passed Macedonian national security information to the NLA prior to the attack by the KLA/NLA on Aračinovo. The Ochrid Agreements saw Macedonia grant generous autonomy rights to its Albanian population in an effort to keep the violence that wracked Kosovo and Bosnia from spilling over into generally peaceful Macedonia. The Ochrid Agreements are now in jeopardy as the destabilization forces of Nuland and Soros increase their pressure on the government in Skopje.

As if on cue from his «Sorosite» masters, Albanian nationalist leader Koco Danaj, said from Tirana, that the Kumanovo incident was the fault of Gruevski, who Danaj likened to Adolf Hitler. Danaj is the leader of an Albanian nationalist group called «Platform for Natural Albania,» which has adherents in Albania, Kosovo, Montenegro, and Macedonia who want to create a «Greater Albania.» Danaj indicated that he has allies in Pristina, Skopje, and Ulcinj, the latter the major Albanian center in Montenegro, who stand ready to bring about a Greater Albania.

In an attempt to intimidate Gruevski, Danaj said «Gruevski will end in blood.» Danaj was warning Gruevksi against any attempt to stamp out foreign Albanian terrorist activities in Macedonia. In fact, the KLA members caught by the police in Kumanovo were, according to Gruevski, planning a series of terrorist attacks on government installations in Skopje and other Macedonian population centers.

At the same time Danaj was making threats against Macedonia from Albania, a NATO member state, Bosniak Muslims staged a reenactment of a wartime Nazi Waffen SS Handzar division parade in Novi Pazar, the capital of the Muslim-dominated Sandzhak province of Serbia. The Bosniaks chose May 9, Victory in Europe Day, to stage their Nazi reenactment parade. The move is similar to the neo-Nazi Waffen SS division parades conducted in Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania and meant to outrage ethnic Russians in those countries. The Bosniak Waffen SS troops were identifiable by their green uniforms and red fezzes and were among Hitler’s fiercest of fighters and the Bosniaks marching in Novi Pazar wore the very same uniforms on VE Day. The Bosniak Muslims of Sandzhak and their like-minded colleagues in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Macedonia largely favor the establishment of an Islamic caliphate in the Balkans that would include the Bosniak Muslims and Albanians.

Zaev, Crvenkovski, and the «Sorosites» are using the outbreak of violence in the Albanian majority regions of Macedonia in an attempt to dislodge from the current government the Albanian political party, the Democratic Union for Integration (DUI), as a junior coalition partner of the governing VMRO DPMNE party of Prime Minister Gruevski.

The problems in the Albanian regions of Macedonia follows violent anti-government demonstrations in Skopje that were egged on by the «Sorosites.» Zaev and Crvenkovski are using unfounded charges that Gruevski’s government eavesdropped on the phone calls of 20,000 Macedonians, as a rallying theme against the government. Largely ignored by the foreign press is the fact that only the U.S. National Security Agency and its British and German partners have the capability to conduct such massive surveillance. The question remains: who provided the Macedonian opposition with the taped conversations of Gruevski and other government leaders with the opposition leaders? The sophistication of the intercepts rules out the Macedonian Intelligence Service.

The opposition to Gruevski’s government has been joined by two of the major Soros-funded media operations in Macedonia, the television networks “Telma” and “24 Vesti.” They helped stoke recent violent protests directed at the government on Macedonia Square in central Skopje, demonstrations that saw 36 of the 40 total injured in the melees in front of the government headquarters in Skopje identified as police officers. One Social Democratic leader and ally of Zaev and Crvenkovski, Radmila Shekerinska, was witnessed at a café near the protest venue issuing instructions to protesters to forcibly enter government buildings. Crvenkovksi and Zaev have openly called for a popular uprising against the Macedonian government. The Soros-influenced Radio Free Europe Radio Free Europe has consistently understated the number of police officers injured by «Sorosite» rioters and it has failed to report on the external agitation behind the rioting.

The good news is that Macedonians from all walks of life and ethnic backgrounds, Slavic and Albanian and Muslims and Orthodox alike, are aware of the «Sorosite» influences behind the outbreak of violence in their country and they are willing to stand up against it. For Soros and his agitators within the Macedonian opposition and the U.S. embassy in Skopje, Macedonia, unlike Ukraine, will not be easily walked on.

Source*

Related Topics:

Soros Turned Ferguson from a Local Protest to a National Flashpoint*

George Soros: The Hidden Hand behind Social Unrest*

Ukraine’s Oligarchs Eradicating Each Other*

Ukraine’s Campaign of Political Assassinations of Critics*