Archive | May 15, 2015

Schoolgirls Snatched by Social Services after Complaining to Teacher at being Grounded*

Schoolgirls Snatched by Social Services after Complaining to Teacher at being Grounded*

By Sue Reid

Relaxing at their lovely family home this week, Victoria Seymour cuddles her daughters Georgia and Grace as though she will never let them out of her sight.

Life is beginning to get back to normal for the family after a nightmare ordeal in which — after a throwaway remark from Georgia at school — social workers seized the girls, put them in foster homes and threatened never to let them return to their parents.

The two children had been told off by Victoria for squabbling in the kitchen. She ordered them to stay indoors for the weekend, with no computer games or TV.

Faced with this dreary prospect, Georgia, the eldest, complained to her primary school teacher that she was ‘frightened’ to go home.

As 38-year-old Victoria explained to the Mail this week:

‘Georgia concocted the story to try to avoid a boring Saturday and Sunday. Without even checking the truth with me, the social workers just stepped in and tore our family apart on the word of a naughty child.’

Victoria and her husband Alan found themselves being investigated for emotionally and physically abusing the girls, then aged 11 and nine, by child protection staff, health workers and even the police, after they had returned from their home in Australia to care for Alan’s mother in England.

It was only after a three-month battle that the couple won the girls back and then fled to Australia. There’s one thing of which they are certain: they will never again set foot in Britain, where they were both born.

The Seymours have begun legal action against Bridport social services in Dorset for breaching their human rights and causing their children mental anguish.

During their stay here, they came within a whisker of losing their beloved girls.

This couple are speaking out because they want to warn other families what could happen to them.


Forcibly seizing children for adoption — which is what the Seymours were told was on the cards for Georgia and Grace — is unheard of in other countries.

England and Wales stand alone in Europe in their readiness to take away children without their parents’ consent.

A damning Council of Europe report on child protection, published last month, warned:

‘England and Wales are unique in placing so many children for adoption, in particular in the young age group which is “popular” in its adoption market.’

It said 80% of babies and under-fives ‘forcibly taken’ from their families by social workers are never returned, but are adopted by ‘strangers’.

Olga Borzova, a Russian member of the council’s social affairs committee, who wrote the report after a fact-finding visit, criticised the number of children removed from parents in Britain, including those from foreign families visiting or working here.

The numbers have provoked protests to the Government and to Sir James Munby, the head of the family courts, from ambassadors and government representatives of 34 countries, including Russia, Nigeria, Latvia, India and the Czech Republic.

In France, the Senate (the upper house of parliament) has approved a change in the Republic’s law to stop French children here being removed for adoption.

The legislation says:

‘Children of French families living abroad must be returned to France… in particular to avoid forced adoption without permission of the biological parents. This type of situation exists in particular in the UK.’

Slovakia’s Ministry of Justice is threatening to take the UK to the European Court of Human Rights after at least 30 of its young citizens — including babies — were taken from their mothers.

And the Latvian government has written in protest to the leader of the House of Commons because in the past three years, 136 Latvian children living here have been ‘illegally or forcibly’ adopted by British families.

The Seymours have begun legal action against Bridport social services in Dorset for breaching their human rights and causing their children mental anguish (Victoria pictured here with Georgia, centre, and Grace, left)

 
In response to the international furore, Sir James has said judges and social workers must not ‘seize control’ of foreign children and their future must be decided by courts in their own country.

But his words have a hollow ring for the Seymours, who so nearly lost their daughters within weeks of arriving in England.

Alan, 58, emigrated down under with his parents in 1967. While on holiday in the UK in 2006, he met Victoria, who had two daughters — Georgia and Grace. The couple married in 2010 and settled in Canberra, where the girls enjoyed — as their parents say ruefully — all of life’s so-called ‘essentials’, including iPads and their own computers.

They admit their daughters were spoiled, precocious and, though intelligent, academically lazy.

‘Both spent far too much time at school socialising and being disruptive in class,’ says Alan.

The family’s terrifying brush with social services came after Alan’s father, who retired back to Britain, died suddenly on Christmas Day 2011, aged 81.

Alan’s ailing mother was left in shock and unable to look after herself at her home in Salwayash, near Bridport.

Alan felt he had a duty to step in. He resigned as an account manager in Australia, and the family travelled back to Britain the following year.

They moved into his mother’s four-bedroom house and, in the autumn of 2012, the girls started at Bridport primary school. There were problems from the start.

The children found themselves struggling to cope at school because the system was different to Australia. The girls say they were bullied by other pupils over their accents and soon began to resist going to school.

Alan’s mother was also unhappy with what Victoria and Alan call the ‘invasion of her home by two young, vibrant, energetic and extremely vocal girls’.

It was not a perfect situation for any family. Meanwhile, short of money, Alan and Victoria were trying to set up a business as freight-forwarding agents.

The girls were missing their friends and their laissez-faire Australian lifestyle. And then, only a few weeks after the start of term, social services in Bridport began to take an interest.

‘Our youngest, Grace, said something at school about it being “torture” at home,’ says Alan.

‘The next thing, a social worker was on the phone to Victoria and, at a meeting later that day, threatened to take not just Grace, but both our girls away if necessary.’

Of course, there are always two sides to any story and the social worker — having been alerted by the school — must have been alarmed that a nine-year-old child had made such a remark.

The Seymours see it differently. ‘We kept asking ourselves:

How can a servant of the state act in such an aggressive, offensive, invasive and draconian manner on the uncorroborated word of a disorientated small girl?”’ says Alan.

‘We made our own mistakes as well. In our naivety and relaxed Australian honesty, we did tell the social worker when she visited that the girls were difficult to handle on occasions, but that we were dealing with it.’

Yet as a result of the couple’s honesty, Victoria was ordered to attend a series of ‘Child in Need’ meetings with both girls to have her parenting skills assessed by Bridport children’s services.

She was warned by social workers that if she did not turn up or was deemed to be ‘unco-operative’, the state had powers to take the girls into care and put them up for adoption.

When the meetings did not materialise on three occasions because social workers failed to arrive, had not been briefed or were on holiday, the Seymours dared to hope their nightmare had passed and would prove to be just a hiccup in their lives.

But they could not have been more wrong. The girls were increasingly unhappy and disruptive in class. At home, the Seymours were also battling with their behaviour. Less than a year after the family had arrived from Australia, in early June 2013, Georgia started the social services’ ball rolling again when she told a teacher she was ‘too frightened to go home’.

The night before, she and her sister had been warned they would be grounded the following weekend without TV or computers.

‘We think the threat of being grounded was the catalyst,’ says Alan. ‘Normally we would tick them off and the whole incident would be forgotten within an hour.

‘Because they had been squabbling loudly in the kitchen, we had said they should stay in and spend the weekend helping us clean the house.’

To the horror of Victoria and Alan, immediately after Georgia’s unfortunate remark, the girls were marched out of school and sent to a foster home.

A fortnight later, there was a conference called by Bridport social services, which decided they would be placed under a care protection order.

A report afterwards stated:

‘We are of the view that while there was no specific injury to either of the children, there are clearly issues around child safety according to statements made by the girls.’

Frustrated and upset, Alan and Victoria wrote to Bridport children’s services saying they wanted the girls returned to them ‘within 24 hours’. The response was ‘swift and merciless’, they say. Social workers successfully applied for an emergency protection order, formalising the fostering arrangement at the local court.

During the rest of the summer, the girls were moved from one foster placement to another, and were begging, in phone calls, to come home.

‘Our girls had come to realise that life in foster care is stricter than at home, with even more restrictions on tidiness, access to TV and standards of behaviour,’ says Victoria.

Allowed only occasional weekend visits to their parents, the girls were saying they were frightened at the foster homes.

Twice, they had bruises on their faces and bodies, which social workers insisted was because they had been fighting each other.

The girls told an entirely different story to their parents.

In an email to social workers, the Seymours said that younger daughter Grace was ‘petrified at night and crying until she vomited’, while the only reaction from her foster mother was to ‘bang on the door and tell her to be quiet’.

The email added: ‘Grace says she feels very sad, lonely and missed not having one of us to come in and cuddle her.’

Alan and Victoria hired a lawyer, bombarded Bridport social workers with emails, and put up a determined fight.

Their solicitor was so worried the children would never be returned that he privately advised the family to escape to France, taking Georgia and Grace with them, when they next made a weekend visit.

However, the family had another plan — they had decided to escape Britain and return to their home in Australia, taking the girls and Alan’s mother, too.

But then something dramatic happened. The couple had just told the girls and social workers they had bought flight tickets back to Canberra when Victoria received a phone call from Bridport social services’ department.

It was from a senior social worker asking if the girls could be returned to their parents that very afternoon between 5pm and 6pm.

The care protection order was about to be lifted — without any apology or explanation.

At 5.08pm that day in September, Victoria sent Alan, who was at work, a text message saying simply: ‘They are home.’

Within a week, the whole family had left for Canberra, leaving the house and their pet dogs behind.

Last night, Dorset County Council, which oversees Bridport children’s services, said of the Seymour family’s experience: ‘We do not comment on individual cases.

‘The council always considers the best interests of the child and any decision is carefully scrutinised through the proper legal processes.’

Today, Alan says from Australia:

‘We admit we were very lucky compared with other families living in or visiting your country.

‘We fear the vast majority of children taken by social services never get back to their birth families again.

‘Until very recently, Victoria was reluctant to allow the girls out on their own for fear of losing them again if British social workers turned up out of the blue.

‘She would drive them to school and pick them up, even though it is less than a mile away.

‘Victoria constantly checked on the children, at various times of the day and night, to reassure her they were still safe and had not been snatched.’

Finally, he adds:

‘We believe the only reason we got back the girls is because we fought the social workers every step of the way.’

Source*

Related Topics:

British Family Courts: Protecting Children from the Baby Snatchers*

Medically Kidnapped Family Reunite by Escaping Canada*

Cultural Marxism in Action: Special Needs Sisters Taken from Homeschooling Family*

Police Seize 10 Children from “Off-Grid” Homeschooling Family*

NWO Next Step in Making the State Warden of Your Child*

Scotland: The State Take-over of Children*

Bertrand Russell on the Manipulation of Society*

Advertisements

If U.S. et al Hold out Long enough there will be no Palestinian State to Recognize*

If U.S. et al Hold out Long enough there will be no Palestinian State to Recognize*

136 Nations Recognize a Palestinian State

Will a UN Security Council resolution formally recognizing the establishment of a Palestinian state be passed by the end of 2015?

Now that the Vatican has formally recognized a Palestinian state, there is a tremendous amount of international momentum for precisely such a UN Security Council resolution.  In fact, France plans to push really hard for one by the end of this year.  At this point, the only thing that could derail those plans is Barack Obama.

For years, the threat of a Security Council veto has been the one thing stopping a resolution from moving forward.  But now that Benjamin Netanyahu has been re-elected and has put together a cabinet that does not seem inclined to negotiate with the Palestinians, the Obama administration is pledging to “re-evaluate our approach” and says that it will not “prejudge” what it will do if a vote comes up at the United Nations.  And as you will see below, one news source is now reporting that behind the scenes Barack Obama has already given the “green light” for France to go ahead with a resolution on a Palestinian state at the UN.  If this is truly what Obama plans to do, it will absolutely shatter U.S. relations with Israel and plunge the entire Middle East into chaos.

Most Americans don’t realize this, but 136 countries already formally recognize a Palestinian state.  Those 136 nations have a combined population of more than 5.5 billion people.

As of this moment, the major holdouts are the United States, Canada, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand and most of Europe.  But most of the European nations have already indicated that they are ready to recognize a Palestinian state if the United States will.  In fact, as I mentioned above, France plans to lead the push for a Palestinian state at the UN Security Council.

The “State of Palestine” already has “non-member observer” status at the UN, but obviously they are not satisfied with that.  They have been very eager for formal recognition by the UN, and now that the Vatican has given them formal recognition that has really bolstered their cause.  The following is from a CNN article about the Vatican announcement that stunned the world on Wednesday…

The Vatican announced Wednesday that it had brokered a treaty with the “state of Palestine,” upsetting Israeli advocates and propelling Pope Francis into the heart of yet another geopolitical fray.

The treaty is expected to be signed “in the near future,” the Vatican said. Mahmoud Abbas, president of the Palestinian Authority, is scheduled to visit Pope Francis on Saturday, the day before the church canonizes two Palestinian nuns.

The treaty is thought to mark the first time the Holy See has formally recognized Palestinian statehood in a legal document.

Of course this didn’t come out of a vacuum.  The truth is that the Vatican has been moving in this direction for quite some time.  Just consider what the Washington Post had to say about the matter…

The move should not be too great a surprise. Since the U.N. General Assembly voted to recognize Palestine as a “non-member observer state” in 2012, the Vatican has referred to the “state of Palestine” in its communiques. When Pope Francis visited the Holy Land last year, the official Vatican program referred to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas as the leader of the “state of Palestine.” And the pontiff publicly referred to the “state of Palestine” at a speech in the West Bank.

The question is which landmass is being referred to by the term ‘Palestinian State’ given the ongoing Israeli-U.S.-European-Arab onslaught of the region as a whole?

Now that the Vatican has done this, international pressure on Obama to support a UN Security Council resolution on a Palestinian state is increasing.

When the UN Security Council resolution being drafted by France comes up for a vote later this year, what will Obama do?

Well, according to Debka, Obama has already given the “green light” for France to move forward…

US President Barack Obama did not wait for Binyamin Netanyahu to finish building his new government coalition by its deadline at midnight Wednesday, May 6, before going into action to pay him back for forming a right-wing cabinet minus any moderate figure for resuming negotiations with the Palestinians.

Banking on Netanyahu’s assertion while campaigning for re-election that there would be no Palestinian state during his term in office, Obama is reported exclusively by our sources to have given the hitherto withheld green light to European governments to file a UN Security Council motion proclaiming an independent Palestinian state.

Not only that, Debka is also reporting that members of the Obama administration have actually travelled to France to help draft the resolution…

To show the administration was in earnest, senior US officials sat down with their French counterparts in Paris last week to sketch out the general outline of this motion. According to our sources, they began addressing such questions as the area of the Palestinian state, its borders, security arrangements between Israel and the Palestinians and whether or not to set a hard-and-fast timeline for implementation, or phrase the resolution as a general declaration of intent.

Incorporating a target date in the language would expose Israel to Security Council sanctions for non-compliance.

If what Debka is reporting is accurate, this represents a massive betrayal of Israel by the Obama administration.

However, the Jerusalem Post is reporting just the opposite.  They are reporting that Obama plans to veto the French resolution…

US President Barack Obama has told associates that he intends to veto the French proposal for a UN Security Council resolution mandating the creation of a Palestinian state and an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank within two years, Channel 10 is reporting on Friday.

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said this past March that Paris planned to start discussions with partners in the “coming weeks” on a United Nations Security Council resolution to lay out the parameters for ending the Middle East conflict.

“I hope that the partners who were reluctant will not be reluctant anymore,” said Fabius, referring to the United States, which has traditionally shielded its ally Israel from any action at the United Nations.

So what is the truth?

Only time will tell.

But what we do know is that Obama was absolutely furious when Netanyahu promised during his most recent campaign that there would not be a Palestinian state as long as he was in office.

And we do know that the Obama administration has pledged to “re-evaluate our approach” and has said that it will not “prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action”

The U.S. would “re-evaluate our approach” based on Netanyahu’s “change in his position,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters as the president flew to Cleveland to deliver a speech on economic policy.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki raised the possibility that the reevaluation could include a shift in position at the U.N. She avoided the usual U.S. language about vetoing Security Council resolutions that Israel opposes.

“The prime minister’s recent statements call into question his commitment to a two-state solution,” Psaki told reporters. “We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action.”

In the final analysis it is so hard to tell exactly what Obama will do, because as he has shown over and over again, lying comes as naturally to him as breathing does.

However, I think that we can get some clues about how obsessed Obama is with the establishment of a Palestinian state from public statements that he has made throughout his presidency.  The following quotes from Barack Obama regarding the need for a Palestinian state come from one of my previous articles

#1 “Negotiations will be necessary, but there’s little secret about where they must lead: two states for two peoples”

#2 “And I think everybody understands the outlines of what a peace deal would look like, involving a territorial compromise on both sides based on ‘67 lines with mutually agreed upon swaps, that would ensure that Israel was secure but would also ensure that the Palestinians have a sovereign state in which they can achieve the aspirations that they’ve held for so long.”

#3 “The only way for Israel to endure and thrive as a Jewish and democratic state is through the realization of an independent and viable Palestine”

#4 “Neither occupation nor expulsion is the answer. Just as Israelis built a state in their homeland, Palestinians have a right to be a free people in their own land.”

#5 “Let me be clear: The United States strongly supports the goal of two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security. That is a goal shared by Palestinians, Israelis, and people of goodwill around the world. That is a goal that the parties agreed to in the road map and at Annapolis. That is a goal that I will actively pursue as President of the United States.”

#6 “…we continue to believe that a two-state solution is the only way for the long-term security of Israel, if it wants to stay both a Jewish state and democratic”

#7 “It is not fair that a Palestinian child cannot grow up in a state of her own, and lives with the presence of a foreign army that controls the movements of her parents every single day.”

#8 “None of us are under any illusion that this would be easy.  As I said in my speech this morning, it has already entailed significant political risk by President Abbas, as well as Prime Minister Netanyahu.  But I think the reason that they’ve been willing to take those risks is they realize this is the best way, the only way, for us to achieve what should be our goal:  two states living side-by-side in peace and security.  It’s right for Palestinian children.  It’s right for Israeli children.”

#9 “Just as the Israeli people have the right to live in the historic homeland of the Jewish people, the Palestinian people deserve the right to self-determination. Palestinian children have hopes and dreams for their future and deserve to live with the dignity that can only come with a state of their own.”

#10 “The only solution is a democratic, Jewish state living side-by-side in peace and security with a viable, independent Palestinian state.”

In the end, I believe that Barack Obama is going to choose to betray Israel at the United Nations, and it will have very serious ramifications that will literally be felt all over the planet.

Source*

Related Topics:

Palestine from Sovereignty to an Israeli Enclave*

Palestinians Now Forced to Live in Caves*

Where Children are Imprisoned and Sexually Abused*

Israel Uses Child Slave Labour to Plant and Harvest its Agriculture*

Palestine Becomes Member of International Criminal Court*

Woman Who Led Palestinian Bid for ICC Membership Arrested 24hrs of Succeeding*

Israel Stopped South African Minister’s Visit to Palestine*

Greater Israel” Requires the Breaking up of Existing Arab States*

Behind the Occult Significance of the Israeli Supreme Court*

Rothschild Temple: The Conspiracy, the Call, the Plan to Destroy Al-Aqsa Mosque*

McCain Appointed to Ukraine “Reform Advisory Team”*

McCain Appointed to Ukraine “Reform Advisory Team”*

Senator John McCain became the main engine of lobbying for lethal arms supplies to Ukrainian forces

Georgia’s fugitive ex-president Mikhail Saakashvili and hawkish US Senator John McCain have been approved as members of the newly-formed International Advisory Group that will help Ukraine’s president in “conducting reforms.”

Saakashvili has been appointed as head of the new advisory group, says the statement on Ukraine’s presidential website.

The list of members included in the advisory group mostly includes current and former European politicians. Among them are the German member of the European Parliament and the current Chairman of the European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs Elmar Brok, Sweden’s former Prime and Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, former Prime Minister of Slovakia Mikulas Dzurinda, and Lithuania’s former Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius.

Joe Biden with Ukraine’s President Petro Poroschenko

Back in February Saakashvili was appointed as a non-staff adviser to Poroshenko. The ex-Georgian president, who was in power from 2004 to 2013, faces numerous charges at home, including embezzlement of over $5 million, corruption and brutality against protesters during demonstrations in 2007. Georgia’s Chief Prosecutor’s Office launched proceedings to indict Saakashvili and place him on the international most wanted list, but Kiev refused to hand over the fugitive president, despite an existing extradition agreement between Ukraine and Georgia.

Saakashvili is known for his strong anti-Russian stance, which garnered heavy US support. In August 2008 during his term in office Georgia launched an offensive against South Ossetia, killing dozens of civilians and Russian peacekeepers stationed in the republic. Georgia’s shelling of Tskhinval prompted Russia to conduct a military operation to fend off the offensive. Despite Saakashvili’s claims that the conflict was “Russian aggression,” the 2010 EU Independent Fact Finding Mission Report ruled that Tbilisi was responsible for the attack.

Image from Facebook (Mikheil Saakashvili’s Page)

Image from Facebook (Mikheil Saakashvili’s Page)

Meanwhile Senator John McCain, for years spearheading the anti-Russian and particularly anti-Putin crusade, said that while he “would love to do anything” to help Ukraine, he has not yet cleared his new appointment under the US Senate rules.

“I was asked to do it both by Ukraine and Saakashvili and I said I would be inclined to do it but I said I needed to look at all the nuances of it, whether it’s legal under our ethics and all that kind of stuff,” McCain told BuzzFeed.

At the onset of the Ukraine’s Maidan protests against former president Viktor Yanukovich, McCain appeared in Kiev to support the uprising that months later culminated in a coup.

“We … want to make it clear to Russia and Vladimir Putin that interference in the affairs of Ukraine is not acceptable to the United States,” the US Senator told a crowd of some 200,000 anti-government protesters in the central square of Ukraine’s capital.

Image from Facebook (Mikheil Saakashvili’s Page)

Image from Facebook (Mikheil Saakashvili’s Page)

Following the new Kiev authorities’ attempt to suppress dissent in the east of the country and Crimea’s ascension into the Russian Federation, McCain became the main engine of lobbying for lethal arms supplies to Ukrainian forces to “defend themselves” and Europe from “Russian aggression.”

“The Ukrainian people don’t want US or Western troops to fight for them; they are simply asking for the right tools to defend themselves and their country,” he said late last month at a hearing on US security policy in Europe.

“Russia’s invasion and dismemberment of Ukraine should remind everyone of the true nature of Putin’s ambitions and the fragility of peace in Europe.”

McCain’s statements fTollowing the Minsk II ceasefire agreement make it clear that peace in Ukraine is not something the hawkish politician supports. Despite the general agreement that Minsk Accords is the only way forward for a political resolution to the crisis, McCain rejected the agreement as “solidifying the gains of Russian aggression.”

In addition, the Senator is a strong supporter of the NATO build-up on Russian borders. McCain insisted recently that the Baltic allies should help secure eastern borders of the alliance as they cannot “continue with business as usual”claiming that Russia poses a “geopolitical challenge… to our entire vision of Europe.”

McCain has also been hinting at starting a new nuclear arms race with Russia.

“Negotiating further strategic nuclear reductions with Russia would be a dangerously naive non-starter with the US Senate. It simply defies common sense to negotiate nuclear reductions with Vladimir Putin,” he said last month following US administration’s call for further strategic nuclear reductions.

Source*

Related Topics:

Open Letter from Former NSA Director and Veterans on NATO’s Ukraine Pretext for WWIII*

Ukrainian Women Speak Out*

The Earthquake that Stopped Before Hitting Ukraine and Russian Borders*

The Biden Dynasty Makes Its Mark in the Ukraine*

Banksters Turning the Ukraine into the GMO Basket of Europe*

Pentagon’s Bio-terrorism-Labs in the Ukraine*

Ukraine Snapped up by the Rothschilds*

Corporate Global Governance Control of Ukraine*

Ukraine’s Campaign of Political Assassinations of Critics*

Guilty as Charged: Smuggling Real Humanitarian Aid into the Ukraine*

U.S. on Russia’s Borders Trying to Provoke War*

City of London’s Imperialist Designs on Russia

Ukrainian Soldiers Refuse to Kill their Own Flee to Russia*

Russia Opens Door To Greece As Sixth Member Of New BRICS World Bank: Russian Oil Makes Athens Europe’s Energy Hub!

Political Vel Craft

Alexis Tsipras and Vladimir Putin produce no major announcements or finance initiatives for Athens Alexis Tsipras Rime Minister Of Greece and Vladimir Putin President Of Federated Russia struck potential deals over investment in energy and other projects.

Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras on Monday held a telephone conversation with Russian Deputy Finance Minister Sergei Storchak. During the conversation, Storchak invited Greece to become the sixth member of the New Development Bank of BRICS countries, Greece’s Syriza party reported on its website. Storchak is a representative of the BRICS Bank which is now being established.

The newly appointed chief of the bank is Kundapur Vaman Kamath, the former Non-Executive Chairman of ICIC Bank, India’s second largest bank.

“The Prime Minister thanked Storchak and said he was pleasantly surprised by the invitation for Greece to be the sixth member of the BRICS Development Bank. Tsipras said Greece is interested in the offer, and promised to thoroughly examine it. He will have a chance to discuss the invitation with…

View original post 1,722 more words

Hungary Kills The Rothschild Banks: Ordered To Vacate Country.

Political Vel Craft

End Rothschild

Hungary is making history of the first order along with Iceland & Russia.

Not since the 1930s in Germany has a major European country dared to escape from the clutches of the Rothschild-controlled international banking cartels. This is stupendous news that should encourage nationalist patriots worldwide to increase the fight for freedom from financial tyranny.

View original post 1,541 more words

Is Obama Confused about the Feudalistic Nature of TPP?*

… and death of U.K. democracy

Related Topics:

The Return of Feudalism

Corporation vs. State: Sweeping TPP Powers Strip Sovereignty*

This is what TPP Looks Like: World Bank Demands Argentina Pay French Company*

Detroit: Your World under TPP*

Europe-wide March against Trade Deal between EU and US*

Would 11 Asian Nations be Stupid Enough to Enslave Themselves in a Trade Deal with the U.S.?*

Pathologists Confirm Vaccines Responsible for Baby’s Death*

Pathologists Confirm Vaccines Responsible for Baby’s Death*

Rachel French did what most parents do: she took her baby to the doctor to get vaccinated. She was unaware of the associated risks that come along with these drugs and learned the hard way. She lost her adorable son less than three days after he was given eight routine vaccines.

Her son’s autopsy report stated he died from asphyxiation from an undetermined cause. There was nothing obstructing his airways, nor did he have any physical signs of trauma at the time of his death.

The medical examiner and detective handling the case did not provide a good enough explanation for Rachel to understand what had happened to her baby. This led Rachel on her own journey to find out the truth. Rachel was told by the doctors that the vaccines had nothing to do with what had happened.

Years later, her lost son came through to her in a dream and eventually helped her uncover the truth. Her own investigation involving a child death investigator and pathologists proved the vaccines were responsible. This is their family’s harrowing story.

A Life That Will Never Be Forgotten

Elijah Daniel French was born on May 4, 2007, in Oakland County, Michigan. His parents and siblings called him “Danny.” He was always so happy, smiled a lot and was loved by everyone around him.

Like most babies in the United States, newborn baby Danny was given his first hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours after birth. When it was time to take him to the doctor’s office to keep receiving the vaccines on the CDC schedule, it wasn’t always easy for mom to make the appointments and she found herself rescheduling them.

On October 18, 2007, Danny was taken in for his unintentionally delayed well-baby check-up. During this visit, at five and-a-half months old, he was vaccinated for seven diseases. He received the DTaP, hepatitis B, polio, Hib and pneumococcal vaccines. He suffered some adverse reactions to the drugs and had difficulty breathing, while dealing with the high fever that also resulted.

On February 25, 2008, Danny was given the same injections he received at his last appointment. He was almost ten months old at this time. Afterwards, the breathing difficulties and high fever returned.

Danny’s paediatric well-baby visits left him unwell. Since the doctor never pointed out a connection to the vaccines and Danny’s reactions, his mother Rachel never made the connection, either. She trusted the doctor would inform her to stop vaccinating her son if he were at risk of injury from subsequent vaccines, but no warning was given.

Rachel consoled her baby and listened to the doctor by giving him Albuterol to deal with his asthma. He was also given Children’s Tylenol® to help ease the fever caused by the vaccines.

Not being made aware that further vaccines could harm her baby, Danny’s mother took him in for the next round. Danny was almost fourteen months old when his mother took him in to receive the routine twelve month shots.

On July 1, 2008, Danny received the MMR, Hib, Varicella, and DTaP vaccines. These eight vaccines were given in four injections.

His mother stated,

“That night, Danny was still eating and drinking but was cranky and slept more than usual.

By the next day, he was extremely fatigued, irritable and had a loss of appetite. He did not have a fever at this time. He was red and warm where they injected him. These symptoms only worsened.

By the third day, Danny was unable to stay awake for longer than thirty minutes, he had zero food intake, his fluid intake diminished and he cried excessively.

Seventy-one hours after his doctor visit, Danny developed a fever from the vaccines and was given Children’s Tylenol. His doctor was called but there was no answer from him because it was the July 4th holiday, the office was closed.

He was given Tylenol at 2:00 PM and was laid down on the floor, on a comforter in the living room, near the wall, where he took a nap. I checked on him while my other children played.

I checked on him at 4:00 PM to see if he felt feverish and he was cool to the touch. I thought he was just cold so I covered him up. He was sleeping, I thought. He didn’t look dead.

It was about forty minutes later when I discovered he was unresponsive and had passed away.

911 was called seventy-five hours post vaccination. The EMS sheet stated four shots were given four days prior. It was actually only 3 days prior that he was vaccinated.

A detective came out briefly and my son was taken to the hospital where he was left. Then his autopsy was to be done and I waited for answers.

I was told my baby most likely died within thirty minutes after he was given the Tylenol, at around 2:30 PM. This was based on lividity, rigor onset, and Tylenol levels in his blood.

I was told, “Oh, vaccines couldn’t have done this,” and I had no reason to question them because they were doctors and doctors don’t lie.

Danny died on July 4, 2008, the day he turned 14 months old, less than three days after he was vaccinated.”

Danny’s Reported Cause Of Death Raised Questions

After Danny passed away, an investigation took place. A detective came for a brief visit and nothing ever came of it. A short time later, Danny’s case was closed as solved, even though there was no resolution.

Danny’s autopsy report stated his death was ruled as position/compression asphyxia from an undetermined manner. This ruling suggests an outside force was responsible, but this didn’t make sense because Danny’s airways were not obstructed and there was no physical trauma to his body and there were no signs he had struggled. Danny had no petechial hemorrhaging in his face and his hyoid bone was intact when he passed.

Rachel decided to contact the medical examiner, L.J. Dragovic, M.D., to get a better understanding of what exactly happened to her son.

Rachel stated,

“I had one conversation in my life with L.J. Dragovic, the medical examiner that handled my son’s autopsy. We spoke over the phone. I asked him what the cause of death reported on the autopsy meant. The explanation he gave was that “it means some outside force put enough pressure on him that he could not breathe.”

He told me my son was too old to die from SIDS and he admitted he did not see pictures of the scene to determine what could’ve put pressure on him. He told me Danny did not die from his asthma, that his asthma was not responsible.

I asked, “Is there any other way this happened? It just isn’t making sense to me.” He said it could have been anything. “You have other kids, right? Probably one of them just laid on him or they stepped on him when they were playing.”

He then told me if I needed any more help that I should call the detective. So I did. I called the detective that day, completely distraught, and I begged him not to tell me if his investigation found it was one of my girls that stepped on him because I thought I could never deal with that.

He said he hadn’t even seen the autopsy yet and he would get in touch with me.

I called back a few days later and was told he was no longer a detective but a patrol officer and my son’s case was forwarded to the sergeant who had taken over the case.

The sergeant told me the case was closed and that I could retrieve the evidence, which included the comforter he was sleeping on. They also took the Tylenol, Albuterol and a sippy cup that was not given back to me.

Danny died on July 4, 2008, and I received his cause of death report on Thursday, September 4, 2008. I talked to Sgt. Troy that following Tuesday and on Wednesday, I picked up the comforter he was laying on when he passed.

The county medical examiner is the only one with authority over the sheriff, my son’s case was not even investigated thoroughly and on Sept 1st of that year, the sheriff’s detective was demoted to patrol duty and the case was taken over by the Sergeant, just in time for his cause of death to be released; the case was closed as solved, but I felt it was never solved.”

The Report Did Not Mention the Vaccines

The serum test performed revealed Danny had a level of 5.5 mg/L of acetaminophen in his blood, which would be from the Tylenol given to him just before he died. The vaccines Danny had just received were not on the report.

Each vaccine contains a large number of ingredients. Vaccines are medical drugs that are injected directly into the body and all of them are associated with life-threatening risks. Vaccines contain heavy metals such as mercury and aluminum that can harm the brain. Metals injected into a person can disrupt their nervous system, helping to shut down the respiratory system.

The vaccines Danny had just received are the most plausible cause of his death. These should have been mentioned on his autopsy report, but they were not. Other parents who have lost their child after vaccination, coming forward, are admitting the same thing, that the vaccines are not being listed on the autopsy.

The EMS sheet stated four shots were given four days prior, but the medical examiner who examined Danny and wrote up the autopsy report didn’t acknowledge this. There was no mention of the three-day illness Danny suffered after the shots, either. Parents want to know why this important information is being ignored.

Rachel then found out the medical examiner that performed her son’s autopsy had publicized his stance on SIDS years before, in 1997.

From an article published in the Irish Times, the author who wrote about L.J. Dragovic had this to say:

“He stressed that he, like the SIDS lobbyists, wanted to see no more unexplained infant deaths.

“But I believe that everything that can be explained should be explained, and people taught how to avoid preventable deaths.”

A lot of infant deaths were due to “positional asphyxia,” where the child smothered, he said.”

“He acknowledged that some sudden infant deaths were not due to asphyxia and were apparently inexplicable. But he preferred the use of the term “undetermined,” and the continued pursuit of explanations. He advocated constant contact with small babies, especially for the first 12 to 18 months, and particular attention to the possible role of older siblings and pets in sudden infant deaths.”

This means that in 1997, when this article was published in the Irish Times, the same medical examiner who performed Danny’s autopsy in 2008, L.J. Dragovic, featured in that article, is still blaming these deaths on older siblings or pets and telling parents sleeping too close to baby should be of concern. He makes no mention of the vaccines these children are being given, as a reason for the concern they are dying so young.

Rachel was tormented by this thought that one of her other kids could’ve caused Danny’s death. This is another horrendous tactic used to hide the truth, to blame other siblings or pets, but not the vaccines, and let the parents fend for themselves.

Elijah Daniel French’s vaccine record

Elijah Daniel French’s Vaccine Record

A Powerful Dream of Danny Helped Lead to Answers

“I was told the vaccines were safe. I never did realize the vaccines could be responsible for what happened to my son. I was told it couldn’t be the vaccines and I trusted them.

I even continued to vaccinate my other children. I never denied vaccines until 2011 when I denied the HPV vaccine for my daughters and the Hep A vaccine for the son I had just after Danny died. I was seven months pregnant with him when Danny passed away.

This was before I knew about Danny, but these two vaccines didn’t sit well with my mommy instinct.

I learned more in 2011. It wasn’t until more than a few years after Danny passed, that I had a weird dream of my son. He came to me in my dream and it is the only dream I know of him being in.

He was just sitting in his bouncy seat and a man’s voice said, “It was the ‘site-o-kin’ storm that killed me.”

I decided to Google the term and found the term cytokine storm. I was shocked at what I had found. This dream, combined with a few other bothersome details, led me to send off his slides and other things I had saved.”

Pathologists Confirm Vaccine-Induced Hypercytokinemia Caused the Asphyxiation

Rachel felt the need to do her own investigation and seek a second opinion. She shared with us,

“My family has cholesterol issues and all of my children get regular blood-work done because we are at a high risk of heart disease from high cholesterol issues.

Danny had blood samples taken when he was twelve months old. On the day of Danny’s well-baby visit two months later, just before he passed, the day he was given that last set of shots, they had to take his blood again because of a previous lab mix-up.

I wasn’t comfortable with the way things were going so I had requested that the samples be sent to a facility for storing.

I had kept a locket of Danny’s hair after he had passed away, some slides requested after his autopsy, and decided to send some teeth and bone fragments from his ashes to the pathologist, along with the stored blood samples I had requested be saved. I then made arrangements to have the evidence reviewed.

Everything was reviewed by three separate pathologists. All three confirmed the same findings. The pathologists stated vaccine-induced hypercytokinemia as the cause of my son’s asphyxiation.

They were able to determine this in large part to the blood panel taken prior to Danny receiving his vaccines, in contrast with the samples I had stored.

They also agreed encephalopathy was likely responsible, as it’s a cytokine storm syndrome.

Danny’s pathology report stated his cause of death was asphyxiation, secondary to hypercytokinemia, caused by vaccines received approximately 72 hours prior.

My son too had a brownish to pinkish colored mucous coming from his mouth when he died. My daughter witnessed this and I saw evidence of this on the blanket when it was returned to me, as well as on his unwashed clothing. I have since been made aware this regularly happens in babies passing after vaccination.”

Danny’s Airways Shut Down Because of the Vaccines

Rachel stated,

“I know it was the vaccines that took my son’s life. A cytokine cascade caused his airway to swell shut, killing him. I no longer vaccinate because of what the vaccines did to my son.

Parents need to trust themselves and always get a second opinion. His life could have been saved if I was warned his earlier reactions were a sign that future vaccines could cause even worse harm.

No parent should ever have to go through this and that’s why I want to share our story.”

Danny is greatly missed and thought of every day. In honour of sweet Danny, his mother made this video to remember him.

A Child Death Investigator Gets Involved

Rachel informed the investigator of the time frame of Danny’s adverse reactions after the vaccines were given. The child death investigator admitted most parents are not made aware of this information before they take their child to get vaccinated. This is very true information and is worth understanding.

This was the investigator’s response:

“I’ve had cases where serious adverse events occurred within prescribed time frames according to the reportable events table and they were not reported. The most recent case was a 4 year old who developed encephalopathy within 5 days of receiving MMR and DTaP.

The Reportable Events Table (RET) states encephalopathy is a reportable event if it occurs within 7 days of DTaP and within 15 days of receiving MMR. The parents got the same answer you got from their doctor, “It couldn’t possibly have been the vaccinations.” Never mind that what had occurred was required by law to be reported, whether or not the doctor thought it was the vaccinations.

I am so sorry for your loss. There is such a heavy bias by health care providers to ignore harm from treatments they give, and it colours every single aspect of vaccine adverse events and their aftermath.

It is so difficult to prove causality because of the ultra high standards they have set and barriers such as physician reticence to admit vaccines may have caused harm. It is a miracle that there are even any NVICP resolutions to cases as it is.

From what you described, your baby had an altered mental status, likely due to encephalopathy. I am so, so sorry for your loss. I’ve actually seen similar cases where the Medical Examiner (ME) determined encephalopathy, but claimed it was secondary to shaken baby and had the parents prosecuted. Horrible, horrible, things.”

Rachel Filed A Report With VAERS

Rachel took it upon herself to file a report with the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) this year, since the doctor that should’ve done this did not. At the moment, she only has a temporary VAERS ID number. She is still waiting for the report to be finalized and it will then be viewable to the public, in the VAERS database.

Based on the deadline of two years to file a claim with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, when your loved one dies likely as a result of being vaccinated, it is now too late for Rachel to file. Had she learned the truth sooner, she would’ve been able to file a claim.

Exceptions should be made in cases like hers and she plans to pursue this. Parents should become familiar with the listed reactions to vaccines by reading the package inserts and the reportable events table. You must learn how difficult it is to receive any compensation should you or a loved one become vaccine-injured.

A Friend Of Rachel Lost Her Own Child After Being Vaccinated

Rachel mentioned,

“A friend I had met before learning the truth about what happened to Danny went through something similar with her baby. The coroner called her and said her baby’s death was a SIDS case related to the DTaP vaccine he received at two months of age.

She called the next day, got a new medical examiner who said the other medical examiner was gone, she waited eight months for the autopsy report that was filled out by a different person and it stated accidental suffocation or something along those lines. She lost her other kids and had to fight tooth and nail to get them back.”

Certain Tests Should Be Performed To Help Prove Vaccine Injuries

Parents need to know what required tests should be performed during the autopsy to help prove their case, should they find themselves filing a vaccine injury claim. They should have their loved one’s cytokine and chemokine protein levels tested. Elevated amounts after vaccination can help prove the vaccines caused their death. Encephalopathy is a commonly suffered vaccine injury in children.

Mandated vaccines contain mercury and aluminum that can damage a person’s brain, causing death or disruption of development.

“If brain tissue is taken, check for Hg and Al, which would indicate those metals crossed the blood brain barrier and may have been the precipitating factor in the child’s demise, as they are potent neurotoxins and can cause encephalopathy.”

MMR- And DTaP-Associated Risks Include Encephalopathy And Death

Two triple vaccines, DTaP and MMR, out of the eight vaccines Danny received, are associated with these risks shown below. This list clearly shows Danny suffered injuries related to these vaccines given to him, but the medical examiner didn’t take notice. Parents need to read the vaccine package inserts and learn these risks.

Vaccine injuries are ignored to protect the vaccine program. Giving more than one vaccine or a combination vaccine to a child helps vaccine manufacturers cover up related injuries because it is too hard to prove which vaccine harmed the person. There is no way to prove which vaccine, or if all of the vaccines, caused the injury.

Instead of proving it’s safe to inject all of these vaccines together during these well-baby checkups, laws have been passed to grant immunity to vaccine makers which give them no incentive to make safer vaccines, but rather an incentive to add more vaccines to the schedule, without testing if it’s safe to inject all of these at once. This is being done while lobbyists are working hard to strip away your exemption rights.

Giving Tylenol After Vaccination Can Be Dangerous

Merck’s manual advises acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Children’s Tylenol®, is known to deplete glutathione levels in the body and can cause liver damage. [6] Glutathione is needed to help detoxify the body. It is a very important antioxidant that helps reduce oxidative stress which can lead to a large number of health problems, including brain damage.

Doctors need to warn parents their child could be harmed more by giving them Tylenol after receiving vaccines, especially the MMR vaccine that Danny had received. Although Danny did not survive, he could’ve been at a higher risk of vaccine-acetaminophen-induced autism because no doctor told Rachel to avoid giving him Tylenol after receiving the MMR injection. “This preliminary study found that acetaminophen use after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination was associated with autistic disorder.”

Vaccinations load the body with viruses, bacteria, heavy metals, foreign animal, plant and human DNA contaminants, synthetic chemicals, genetically modified organisms, etc. Some of these ingredients are documented to cause cancer. Glutathione is needed to help the body rid itself of this toxic build-up.

Danny showed classic signs he was reacting negatively to the vaccines, before he received the Tylenol. The levels of acetaminophen found in his blood during the autopsy were not at a level overdose is said to occur. Consuming acetaminophen after vaccination can add to the cascade effect, causing the body to not detoxify fast enough, thus making it harder to rid the body of the toxic chemicals injected from the vaccines.

Michigan Health Officials Make It Harder For Parents To Opt Out Of Vaccination

“As of Jan. 1, 2015, Michigan parents filing a non-medical exemption form for their children first will be required to ask a health department official to certify that they have received one-sided state vaccine “education.” Without that health department “certification,” a non-medical vaccine exemption will not be accepted by a day care facility, school or other state-funded activity program.”

Michigan’s Republican governor, Rick Snyder, supported and signed off on this bill even though public input was clearly stifled. It’s likely the next step taken will be to remove the philosophical and religious exemptions altogether. This tactic is being played out in other states, including California.

Many parents have informed us their child suffered life-threatening vaccine reactions, including seizures and interrupted SIDS, within minutes to hours after getting vaccinated, but they were later denied a medical exemption from further vaccines. Parents need to get informed, protect and help strengthen their state’s vaccine exemption laws. It’s better to fight for those rights while you still have them, because it’s harder to get them back once gone.

Parents who do not vaccinate their children do not expect another child to get vaccinated to protect their child, even though the media likes to portray this. If health officials want to remove exemption rights, claiming that action protects others, they need to create a new exemption for parents to file to opt out of having any of their children further vaccinated if one of their children died or suffered injuries from the vaccines, protecting those children, too.

You can’t claim you want to protect one child more than another. Without creating a new exemption law for these families while trying to strip away existing exemptions, that is exactly what is being done.

Health officials cannot expect parents to further vaccinate any of their children when one of their children has already suffered an associated risk that comes along with any vaccine, including death, like what happened to Danny. Adding insult to injury, Danny’s death was covered up. It took his mother’s own will to find out the truth and do her own investigative work to get answers.

Please learn which vaccines your child is expected to get when you take them into the doctor’s office for their well-baby checkup. Never leave without a copy of your child’s medical record, showing all of the vaccines given, batch numbers, vaccine manufacturers’ information and where the injections were given. These records routinely go missing to cover up negligence by doctors and nurses and injuries caused by vaccines. It is much easier to get those files at each visit and store these records in a safe place for when you may need them.

Conclusion

It is very clear that vaccine-related deaths and injuries are being intentionally hidden. Parents of vaccine-injured children are doing their own investigations and coming forward more, seeking the truth denied to them by health officials.

Inform your friends, family and neighbours that this is going on, that children are dying from the vaccines. Be brave. Help preserve your fundamental right to choose what gets injected into you or your child’s body. Making good medical decisions can only be done when you are informed.

Our hearts go out to Danny and his family and all of the other precious children who have suffered the same fate. Their families are working hard for us to raise needed awareness about the harm vaccines can cause.

Elijah Daniel French “Danny” May 4, 2007 – July 4, 2008 Passed away at 14 months old, less than three days after receiving eight vaccines

Elijah Daniel French “Danny”
May 4, 2007 – July 4, 2008
Passed away at 14 months old, less than three days after receiving eight vaccines.

Source*

Related Topics:

Infant Dies after 8 Vaccines, Family Gets Him Back from Hospital Cremated*

How One Father Told His Paediatrician “No” to Vaccines*

Propaganda in Homework: A Parent’s Response*

March 2015: 117 Vaccine Injuries and Deaths*

Where else, but U.S.: Vaccine Bills That Remove Consent and Incarcerate the Infected

$63 Million to Brain-Damaged Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine*

Australia, Forced Vaccines, and Ethnic Cleansing*

‘Get Flu Shots or We’re Taking Your Baby’

Increased Reaction to Drugs Caused By Vaccines

After 32 Vaccine Shots Boy Diagnosed with Autism*

Occupy World: India Takes Legal Action against Bill Gates for His Vaccine Crimes*

Child Abuse or Vaccine Induced Scurvy!?*

Polio Vaccine Spreads Polio-like Disease*

Courts Confirm MMR Vaccine Causes Autism*

Eugenics of the UN, WHO and World Bank in Mexico*

50 African Children Paralyzed by Gates-Funded Meningitis ‘Vaccine’*

CDC Admits MMR Vaccine Increases Autism Risk, Particularly in African American Boys.

Post-Ebola Syndrome or Fluoroquinolone Poisoning?*