Archive | July 9, 2015

The Frankfurt School*

The Frankfurt School*

By Timothy Mathew (abridged Henry Mackow)

The Frankfurt School were a group of Marxist Jewish intellectuals at Frankfurt University in the 1920-1930’s. (They emigrated to NYC after Hitler came to power.) They included Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Herbert Marcuse and  Erich Fromm, and were responsible for the “New Left” and feminism. Financed by Jewish millionaire Felix Weill, they were instrumental in the degradation of Western society according to the long-term cabalist Jewish (Satanist) plan. The connection between Communism and Judaism is the Cabala, i.e. Freemasonry.

The Communist Jewish thinkers described in Timothy Mathew’s “The Frankfurt School:  Conspiracy to Corrupt(Catholic Insight, March 2009) are largely responsible for the degradation of modern Western culture.  This is irrefutable proof that we have been inducted into a satanic cult whose aim is to pervert, enslave and exploit humanity.

Basically, the [task of the] Frankfurt School was to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. They called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life to de-stabilize society and destroy what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order.

They hoped their policies would spread like a virus–‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no idea about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

  1. The creation of racism offences.
  2. Continual change to create confusion
  3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
  4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
  5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
  6. The promotion of excessive drinking
  7. Emptying of churches
  8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
  9. Creating dependency on the state or state benefits
  10. Control and dumbing down of media
  11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family


One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pan-sexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

  • attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
  • abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
  • abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
  • declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’

Wily Munzenberg

Comintern propaganda chief Wily Munzenberg, summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’

The School believed there were two types of revolution:

(a) political and

(b) cultural

Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.


Following Karl Marx, the School stressed how the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family–it was Marx who wrote so disparagingly about the idea of the family being the basic unit of society. All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse under the guise of ‘women’s liberation.’

They proposed transforming our culture into a female-dominated one. In 1933, Wilhelm Reich, one of their members, wrote in The Mass Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only genuine family type of ‘natural society.’

Eric Fromm, was also an active advocate of matriarchal theory. Masculinity and femininity, he claimed, were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought but were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.’

The revolutionaries knew exactly what they wanted to do and how to do it. They have succeeded.


Lord Bertrand Russell joined with the Frankfurt School in their effort at mass social engineering and spilled the beans in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society. He wrote: ‘Physiology and psychology afford fields for scientific technique which still await development.’

The importance of mass psychology ‘has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education. The social psychologists of the future will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Russell said education will affirm:

Product of an old Illuminati family, Bertrand Russell “First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark grey . When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”


Writing in 1992 in Fidelio Magazine, [The Frankfurt School and Political Correctness] Michael Minnicino observed how the heirs of Marcuse and Adorno now completely dominate the universities, ‘teaching their own students to replace reason with ‘Politically Correct’ ritual exercises.

There are very few theoretical books on arts, letters, or language which do not openly acknowledge their debt to the Frankfurt School. The witch hunt on today’s campuses is merely the implementation of Marcuse’s concept of ‘repressive toleration’- ‘tolerance for movements from the left, but intolerance for movements from the right’-enforced by the students of the Frankfurt School’.

Music, TV and Popular Culture 

Theodor Adorno promoted the use of degenerate forms of music to promote mental illness and destroy society. He said the US could be brought to its knees by the use of radio and television to promote a culture of pessimism and despair – by the late 1930s he (together with Max Horkheimer) had migrated to Hollywood.

The expansion of violent video-games also well supported the School’s aims.


In his book The Closing of the American Mind, Alan Bloom observed how Marcuse, appealed to university students in the sixties with a combination of Marx and Freud. In Eros and Civilization and One Dimensional Man, Marcuse promised that the overcoming of capitalism and its false consciousness will result in a society where the greatest satisfactions are sexual. Rock music touches the same chord in the young. Free sexual expression, anarchism, mining of the irrational unconscious and giving it free rein are what they have in common.’

In her booklet Sex & Social Engineering (Family Education Trust 1994) Valerie Riches observed how in the late 1960s and early 1970s, there were intensive parliamentary campaigns taking place emanating from a number of organizations in the field of birth control (i.e., contraception, abortion, sterilization).

‘From an analysis of their annual reports, it became apparent that a comparatively small number of people were involved to a surprising degree in an array of pressure groups. This network was not only linked by personnel, but by funds, ideology and sometimes addresses: it was also backed by vested interests and supported by grants in some cases by government departments. At the heart of the network was the Family Planning Association (FPA) with its own collection of offshoots. What we unearthed was a power structure with enormous influence.

‘Deeper investigation revealed that the network, in fact extended further afield, into eugenics, population control, birth control, sexual and family law reforms, sex and health education. Its tentacles reached out to publishing houses, medical, educational and research establishments, women’s organizations and marriage guidance–anywhere where influence could be exerted. It appeared to have great influence over the media, and over permanent officials in relevant government departments, out of all proportion to the numbers involved.

‘During our investigations, a speaker at a Sex Education Symposium in Liverpool outlined tactics of sex education saying:

‘if we do not get into sex education, children will simply follow the mores of their parents’. The fact that sex education was to be the vehicle for peddlers of secular humanism soon became apparent.”


Related Topics:

Bertrand Russell on the Manipulation of Society*

Cultural Marxism in Action: Special Needs Sisters Taken from Homeschooling Family*

The Elite’s Cultural Marxist Agenda

Why Billionaire Oligarchs Bankroll Feminism*

Rockefeller Music Project in the War on Consciousness*

National Educational Association Blasts Homeschooling*

Kenyan Leaders to Obama: Don’t Lecture us on Gay ‘Marriage’*

6th Graders Implanted with IUD’s Without Their Parents Knowledge*

American College of Paediatricians Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage was a ‘A Tragic Day for America’s Children’*

Clinton Receives Massive Funding from American-Jewish Oligarch*

Clinton Receives Massive Funding from American-Jewish Oligarch*

You can tell something what a politician’s real agenda is by who is backing them. And as far as the next U.S. presidential election is concerned Hilary Clinton is already beginning to look like the worst of a bad bunch.

Of course that could easily change because each candidate is starting to look worse than the next. Jeb Bush, for example, could prove to be an even more dismal prospect than either his brother or his father.

However right now Hilary Clinton looks the most suspect, at least judging by her supporters who already appear to be dictating the terms of their support.

Haim Saban, right, with Bill Clinton, Ted Koppel and Bill Clinton at the Saban Forum in 2006

One such is Haim Saban, the Israeli-American media mogul who has been a major fundraiser for Hilary Clinton in the past. A hard-core Zionist, Saban has just donated a further $2 million to Clinton’s campaign fund.

In return Clinton has promised to condemn the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel. Meaning, in effect, that if elected Clinton’s Zionist backers will be dictating her foreign policy and maybe her domestic policies too. Perhaps even more so than in previous administrations.

“I know you agree that we need to make countering BDS a priority,” Clinton wrote in a July 2 letter to Saban.

“I will be speaking out publicly on this in the weeks ahead, so I am eager to hear your perspective and advice,” Clinton continued. Adding, “Look forward to working with you on this.”

Saban, in press release on the letter, said it underscores Clinton’s commitment to Israel.

“As I have been saying all along, when she becomes president, Hillary will reinforce the U.S.-Israel relationship,” he was quoted as saying.

rothschild bankRight now Hilary Clinton’s campaign war chest reportedly stands at $45 million with additional contributions from George Soros.

For his part Soros is reported to require a pro-abortion stance from Clinton in return for his support. Although undoubtedly, he will also expect unconditional support for Israel too.

With such an emphasis on campaign funds, you’d be forgiven for thinking that the outcome in the U.S. presidential race was determined by which candidate was the best funded. Rather than the appeal their policies held for voters.

If the broad mass of Americans were informed and aware the U.S. presidential elections might indeed be a genuine contest, where common sense and political integrity were deciding factors. However, decades of disinformation and a corporate media in cahoots with big money and the banks has ensured a stupefied electorate.

Of course not all Americans have been entirely dumbed down but a great many are unable to think for themselves, let alone make informed political choices.

fbca1-iuMeaning, in effect, that the next U.S. presidential election will be determined by Mammon and big money rather than by informed voters.

Like they say though, people get the leaders they deserve.

So instead of real political leaders Americans will get puppets instead. Members of one or another dynasty, who are ready to serve the interests of Israel and big money. Making the U.S. presidential election little more than a carnival sideshow, where smooth talking showmen vie to pull the wool over the eyes of ordinary Americans.


Related Topics:

Gala in California Raised $30+mn for the Israel Defense Forces*

Presidential ‘Hopeful’, H. Clinton Gold Digging on 100,000 Haitian Deaths*

The Clintons and their Bankster Friends, 1992-2016*

Ukrainian Oligarch Donated $10 Million to the Clinton’s*

Bilderberg 2015: Global Command & Control System‏*

George Soros: The Hidden Hand behind Social Unrest*

Time to Shatter the Illusion of U.S. Elections*

Outcry Grows After EU Gives Green Light to TTIP*

Outcry Grows After EU Gives Green Light to TTIP*

A Friends of the Earth activist said politicians ignoring public outcry about the TTIP will only strengthen opposition to the deal.

After the European Parliament approved the controversial Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership on Wednesday, civil society organizations and social movements have again expressed widespread concerns about public health, the environment, and other issues to be impacted by the deal.

The EU body gave the green light to the much-debated deal, despite having called for the TTIP’s U.S.-supported investor-state trade dispute mechanism be replaced with a different system.

Even though the EU had challenged a key U.S. feature of the trade pact, European civil society groups have slammed the vote for not doing enough to reject the investor-state settlement and turning a blind eye to the public outcry over the undemocratic nature of the deal

“The people of Europe are rightly concerned about the threat TTIP poses to our environment, food, health and social protections,” said Friends of the Earth Europe trade campaigner Natacha Cingotti in a statement.

“They expected the European Parliament to take a strong stance but MEPs have sided with big business and put democracy at risk by supporting these talks.”

The investor-state dispute settlement system in the TTIP expands allows foreign investors and corporations to sue countries for perceived infringement on their profits. Despite opposition, this feature of the deal remains intact after the EU vote, a troubling move for social movements.

“The European Parliament today missed the opportunity to stop TTIP from undermining our democracy and social and environmental standards,” said Global Justice Now Director Nick Dearden, adding that the reforms to the dispute settlement that are “purely cosmetic” were opted for instead. “In essence, foreign investors are still to receive substantial additional rights compared with domestic companies and a parallel justice system to domestic courts to enforce these rights.”

According to social and environmental rights groups, the TTIP includes measures that grant special privileges to foreign investors that will undermine food and safety standards, public health, and efforts to tackle climate change while forging closer links with the U.S.

While the parliament was divided on the vote, ultimately the majority of members went against the more than 2.3 million people in Europe who have called for immediate end to TTIP negotiations, according to War on Want Executive Director John Hilary, who said the trade deal is “a nightmare vision of a world sold into corporate slavery.”

But according to Friends of the Earth’s Cingotti, the fight is far from over.

“Ignoring the massive public mobilisation against this dangerous Trojan Horse treaty will only result in strengthening opposition to it,” she said.


Related Topics:

TPP Preparedness: EU Drops Pesticide Laws*

TPP Preparedness: New Bolivian Law Forces Investor Disputes to Be Settled Locally*

Obama Delivers the U.S. on TPP Platter*

National Education Association Long Campaign for Gay ‘Marriage’*

National Education Association Long Campaign for Gay ‘Marriage’*

By Alan Sears

First Published August 25, 2006

Forward courtesy of Dr Charles Morris

The curious case of NEA priorities

It is, arguably, the most powerful union and lobbying group in the country. And you cannot envy what its members are up against.

Day after day, the National Education Association (NEA) sees the same statistics we do.

Plunging test scores. Floods of incoming college freshman who can’t read at even a sixth-grade level. Principals and school boards groping for incentives that will draw better teachers into lifelong service for high stress and infrequent appreciation.

Instead of embracing the joys of books and learning, America’s children are gorging junk food on the couch, dabbling with R-rated music videos and video games while their synapses run headlong down blind brain alleys.

Teacher morale remains low, as many grapple daily with parents who are disengaged and apathetic, neurotic or demanding, angry or eager to move their child into alternative educational settings.

Add to all that the professional pressures inherent in ‘No Child Left Behind,’ and you can understand how the NEA leaders who gathered this summer in Orlando for their annual convention had their work cut out for them. The toughest question was undoubtedly the first one: where do we start, when it comes to fixing America’s schools?

Well, they figured it out. And, really, faced with so many incredible challenges, their priority makes sense. This is, after all, the NEA. They know the classroom. They know the teachers. They know the real challenges of education.

Which is why their elected leaders decided that, before anything else, the first thing our teachers have to do is win popular support for homosexual ‘marriage.’

That’s right. The all-knowing members of the NEA decided that what our kids need to know ‘more than math, geography, grammar, science, or computer skills’ is what men and men see in each other, why women and women fall in love, and what our government and society ‘owes’ those who practice homosexual behaviour.

You can see why that kind of information is critical to a third grader, can’t you?

social engineeringOf course not. The NEA didn’t think so. That’s why they’re taking the matter out of your hands. Listen, when the world’s largest teacher’s union elects to endorse same-sex ‘marriage,’ they’re not talking tacit support. They’re talking posters and projects, classroom lectures and guest speakers, testimonials and textbooks — at every grade level, and in every public school, in every school district in America.

Questions, of course, accumulate. Among them:

What if a teacher or principal objects to same-sex unions, for reasons of personal faith or experience? What if said educator doesn’t want his (often mandatory) NEA dues going to support those who promote homosexual behaviour? What if parents don’t want their children learning about sex (or sexual politics) at school? What if children are ill-equipped, mentally or emotionally, to handle the information presented by a zealous instructor?

Either the NEA has considered, and dismissed, these questions — in which case the group that wants to exert the most significant impact on America’s teachers, parents, and children turns out to have no real concern or compassion for our teachers, parents, or children… or else the union has not considered these crucial questions, in which case… ditto.

Either way, the academic needs of children are no longer as much a priority for this organization as the political agenda of those who engage in homosexual behaviour.

Actually, that’s not anything new for the teachers’ union. The NEA has been working hand-in-glove for years with aggressive promoters of homosexual behaviour. Indeed, former NEA president Bob Chase is a member of the board of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educational Network), and once defended NEA’s force-feeding of the homosexual agenda to children by warning that:

‘Some critics want the public schools to be an agent of moral doctrine, condemning children and adults when they are not in accord with Biblical precepts.’

But if the NEA objects to teaching moral doctrines — how do they justify teaching immoral doctrines? If they’re against teaching creationism, for example, for its spiritual implications, how can they favour sex education classes that indoctrinate even very young children with homosexual advocacy?

How can they bar prayers, ministers and Christian clubs from campus, while organizing school assemblies, demonstrations, and classroom visits featuring homosexual and transgender ‘role models’?

Clearly, the NEA has rejected its prima facie identity as the representative of America’s teachers, in favour of a new raison d’etre: brainwashing schoolchildren into acceptance of, and even indulgence in, homosexual behaviour. For the union’s leaders, there will be no rest until families all over the country not only acknowledge, but embrace and endorse the homosexual agenda.

It’s as simple as A-B-C. What those pressing that agenda cannot win at the ballot box, they will win in the minds of the next generation… one vulnerable child at a time.

Alan Sears, a former federal prosecutor who held various posts in the departments of Justice and Interior during the Reagan Administration, is president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. He is co-author with Craig Osten of the book The ACLU vs. America: Exposing the Agenda to Redefine Moral Values and The Homosexual Agenda: Exposing the Principal Threat to Religious Freedom.


Related Topics:

Globalized Education and One World Government

UN’s Heterophobic Agenda*

The Elite’s Cultural Marxist Agenda

Religious Schools Face Closure if they don’t Promote Homosexuality*

Sexual Liberation a Tool of Mass Control*

Ontario’s Premier Grooming Youngsters for Sex

Sex Education, the Key to Social Engineering*

Ontario Teacher Disciplined for Criticizing Child Sex Ed. – Paedophilia Program*

Member States Object to UN Reproductive Rights Agenda*

Children were Sexualized to Keep Abortion Cash Flowing*

Taking School Sex Education too Far*

Sex Slaves in the White House

The West Exports Porn, Casual Sex, and the Blood of the pre-born not Freedom*

U.N. – NWO’s Ordered Allow Homosexuality and Abortion or Forget Aid*

WHO Tells Governments they must Provide Abortion and Sex Change*

American College of Paediatricians Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage was a ‘A Tragic Day for America’s Children’*

Norway Bill Would let Kids Change their Sex at Age 7*

National Educational Association Blasts Homeschooling*

National Educational Association Blasts Homeschooling*

National Educational Association Blasts Homeschooling*

The National Education Association has launched an attack on the practice of homeschooling, and one leading education expert is not taking it lying down.

Schooling By David Dees“The National Education Association’s radical attacks on constitutionally protected liberties and homeschooling families in particular are outrageous and should be vehemently denounced by every real educator and every real American,” internationalist journalist and educator Alex Newman declared.

The NEA’s 2014-2015 resolution on homeschooling begins like this: “The National Education Association believes that home schooling programs based on parental choice cannot provide the student with a comprehensive education experience.”

Freelance writer Patrice Lewis, who homeschools her children, seethed at that line.

“Who has the authority to define ‘comprehensive?'” Lewis asked.

“The NEA? Why should they be the ones to define comprehensive and not the parents? Each family may define a ‘comprehensive’ education differently, and each parent should have the right to choose how they want their children educated.

“‘Comprehensive’ as defined by a far-left progressive agenda-driven union and special interest-supported legislators and bureaucrats is almost guaranteed to fly in the face of the morals, values and traditions of parents who don’t have similarly leftwing progressive agenda-driven views.”

Newman, who co-authored the book “Crimes of the Educators: How Utopians Are Using Government Schools to Destroy America’s Children,” pointed out that if homeschooled children weren’t getting a good enough education, they wouldn’t be beating public school students like they are now.

The undeniable fact is that homeschooled children outperform victims of NEA-controlled government schools on every objective metric by huge margins,” Newman claimed. “The NEA knows this, and it is undoubtedly one of the association’s central motivations for this reckless attack.”

Lewis, a WND columnist, seconded that point.

To the frustration of the NEA, homeschoolers have become well-known for their academic strengths,” she said. “This has been demonstrated over and over again when homeschoolers whup the fannies of publicly educated kids on standardized test scores.”

Indeed, the National Home Education Research Institute reports homeschooled students typically score 15 to 30 percentile points higher than public-school students on standardized academic achievement tests. And this is regardless of the parents’ level of formal education or the family’s household income.

Lewis noted homeschooled children earn higher GPAs in college and graduate at higher rates than their public-schooled peers despite the supposed lack of socialization associated with homeschooling. But the fact is they’re actually more socialized than other kids, she said.

“That’s because homeschoolers aren’t locked in the artificial environment of classrooms, and instead are out in the real world, making friends of all ages and experiencing life outside of structured field trips,” Lewis explained.

“Additionally, and unlike many public-schooled kids, homeschooled children are almost uniformly mature, socially capable, polite, well-spoken, ethical and hard working. These intangible benefits are every bit as important as the tangible academic subjects for a well-rounded ‘comprehensive’ education, and in fact arguably are more important in terms of long-term job prospects and security.”

The NEA actually wants to discourage homeschooled kids from socializing with their public school peers. Part of the organization’s resolution states, “The association also believes that homeschooled students should not participate in any extracurricular activities in the public schools.”

Lewis’ reaction was, “Um, who’s paying for public schools in the first place? Answer: taxpayers, which include homeschooling parents. They should have every right to participate in extracurricular activities they’ve paid for.”

Lewis said it makes no sense for schools to bar homeschooled children from extracurricular activities, because even if those students participate, they are still using far less of the school’s resources than regular public-school students, even though the parents of the homeschoolers are still paying the same amount in taxes.

“The fact that the NEA is against such homeschooling participation in extracurricular activities smacks of petty vindictiveness and a punitive, spiteful attitude, rather than intelligent reasoning or – more likely – the lost opportunity to indoctrinate another child into the progressive brainwashing,” Lewis opined.

Furthermore, the NEA homeschooling resolution states: “Instruction should be by persons who are licensed by the appropriate state education licensure agency, and a curriculum approved by the state department of education should be used.”

But if every child learned from a state-approved teacher and a state-approved curriculum, the results would be similar to what is seen in communist countries, according to Lewis.

“We would have dismally identical uniformity of thought, behaviour and morals,” Lewis said. “We would have no creativity, no diversity, no thinking outside the box. We would crush the spirits of children whose interests, skills and abilities fall outside what the NEA deems acceptable.”

America is such a diverse land, according to Lewis, that uniformity in education makes no sense.

She said, “No one wants to have their children shoehorned into an educational system that gives no variety, no opportunities for the exceptionally gifted or exceptionally slow; a place with no permitted variation in opinions, learning methods or viewpoints. That’s what communist schools do. Does America really want rigid uniformity in its youth? I thought the left was all about ‘diversity.’ Why not in education? Or are progressives lying when they claim to support diversity?”
Comment: All state-run educational systems, including those in America, want rigid uniformity in its youth. That’s the whole point. Rockefeller spelled it out perfectly:

“In our dreams, people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present education conventions of intellectual and character education fade from their minds and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into men of learning or philosophers, or men of science. We have not to raise up from them authors, educators, poets or men of letters, great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, statesmen, politicians, creatures of whom we have ample supply. The task is simple. We will organize children and teach them in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way.

~ First mission statement of the J.D. Rockefeller-endowed General Education Board in 1906

Newman, for his part, believes giving government schools an even greater monopoly over education would be “the worst possible education policy.” But he thinks more Americans will begin to homeschool as they realize the public schools are failing their children.

“As more and more Americans – people of every race, religion, political creed, and socio-economic background – realize what a disaster government schools have become, the homeschooling movement will continue to grow by leaps and bounds,” Newman predicted.

The author said he would like to be able to laugh off the NEA’s resolution, but the association is so powerful that he must take it seriously.

“The fact is that, through compulsory unionism and dues, this extremist outfit has amassed a vast fortune and an army of lobbyists to attack educational liberty,” Newman said. “The NEA and its agenda must be exposed and stopped. In the meantime, serious educators who value freedom and quality education should immediately distance themselves from the NEA and its disgusting attacks on educational freedom, the American people and unalienable rights.”

Lewis believes the bottom line is the NEA doesn’t want any children to escape government control, thus the attack on homeschooling.

“They abhor the thought of allowing children to be ‘brainwashed’ into sincere religious beliefs, conservative or traditional values, and – heaven forbid – a biblical worldview (which to progressives is a fate worse than death for those poor kids),” Lewis exclaimed. “Instead, the NEA and the government want children ready for the ‘Brave New World’ where the state is the supreme authority, values and morals are fluid and situational, and the worldview is based on ‘Fifty Shades of Gray.'”


Related Topics:

7 Children Kidnapped by the State from Homeschooling Family to Remain in Custody*

Cultural Marxism in Action: Special Needs Sisters Taken from Homeschooling Family*

Thousands of Kids Stay Home In Protest against Ontario’s Sex-Ed*

Police Seize 10 Children from “Off-Grid” Homeschooling Family*

Bored with School, Homeschooling Gave Tanishq what he Needed to Excel*

Parent Forced to Call 911 When School Refuses to Release Child over Common Core Testing*

Demonizing Teachers, Privatizing Schools: The Big Lies for Big Plans*

From Public Schools to Indoctrination Centres*

Religious Schools Face Closure if they don’t Promote Homosexuality*

“Common Core” Education Making our Children Stupid!

Globalized Education and One World Government

Kenyan Leaders to Obama: Don’t Lecture us on Gay ‘Marriage’*

Kenyan Leaders to Obama: Don’t Lecture us on Gay ‘Marriage’*

Kenyan National Assembly Speaker Justin Muturi and four other legislators have warned US President Barack Obama against promoting homosexual “rights” in his visit to the country this month.

“Individual rights must not violate the rights of others,” Muturi said.

“Those advancing gay rights must similarly appreciate our Christian, Islamic and African traditional values which abhor homosexuality.”

Pointing out that sodomy is a criminal offence in Kenya, Muturi said his government has the right to “sanction any advances perceived to encroach on our social fabric” and that he believes advocacy of same-sex “marriage” is a form of Western ideological oppression disguised as human rights.

“Liberal thoughts are being entertained in some countries under the guise of human rights,” Muturi said.

“We must be vigilant and guard against this, because we have a responsibility to our children, and our children’s children. We must lead an upright society. We must not allow certain of these obnoxious practices.”

Woman Representative Rose Mitaru, who is also an ordained Canon of the Anglican Church of Kenya, urged Obama to confine his topics of discussion to issues, such as the state of the economy and terrorism, that would actually benefit the country. Promoting the legalization of same-sex “marriage,” she said, would open “floodgates of evil synonymous with the biblical Sodom and Gomorra.”

MP Cecily Mbarire said the government is ready to reject foreign aid if it was tied to acceptance of same-sex “marriage.”

“Our Constitution is very clear. Marriage is of two people of opposite sex,” she said. “The Constitution is against same-sex marriage and nothing should change [when Obama comes]. We are ready to decline any foreign aid if it is tied to gay marriages.”


Related Topics:

Top Sheriff says America is Now Ruled by the ‘Oligarchy’*

Why the West Destroys and Humiliate Peoples

American College of Paediatricians Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage was a ‘A Tragic Day for America’s Children’*

Thousands Rally in Rome to defend Natural Family and against Gender Theory*

Ontario Teacher Disciplined for Criticizing Child Sex Ed. – Paedophilia Program*

WHOs Eugenic Campaign in Africa*

Eugenics: Kenya’s Catholic Bishops Charge U.N. for Sterilizing the Population*

UK Bishop Warns Of ‘A Slide Towards Ever Greater State Control’ as Pressure Mounts On Christians*

Bishops Denounce Horrific Desecration of Christian Images in ‘Gay Pride’*

Bishop Badejo: U.S. won’t fight Boko Haram because of their Eugenics Agenda in Africa*

U.N. – NWO’s Ordered Allow Homosexuality and Abortion or Forget Aid*

WHO Tells Governments they must Provide Abortion and Sex Change*

Repackaged Eugenics for Modern Times*

Pope and the One World Religion?*

Cheney to Face Trial for Crimes in Iraq *

Cheney to Face Trial for Crimes in Iraq *

A former judge at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) said former US Vice President Dick Cheney should – and eventually will – stand trial for war crimes for his role in the Iraq War.

“Some of us have long thought that Cheney and a number of CIA agents who did what they did in those so-called black holes should appear before the” International Criminal Court (ICC), Thomas Buergenthal said in an interview with Newsweek.

Buergenthal, 81, served as a judge at the ICJ – the main judicial arm of the United Nations – for 10 years before retiring in 2010.

The ICJ, unlike the ICC, has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As the ICJ is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate such proceedings.

Buergenthal was born in the former Czechoslovakia and survived the Auschwitz concentration camp as a boy. He is now a US citizen and a professor of law at George Washington University in Washington, DC.

We (in the United States) could have tried them ourselves,” Buergenthal said of Cheney and others.

“I voted for Obama, but I think he made a great mistake when he decided not to instigate legal proceedings against some of these people. I think – yes – that it will happen.”

As for Cheney’s superior for eight years, Buergenthal dismissed former president George W. Bush as “an ignorant person who wanted to show his mother he could do things his father couldn’t.”

Buergenthal said Richard Nixon, whose administration Cheney served in during the 1970s, was “more intelligent. I don’t think Nixon would have got involved in Iraq.”

Related Topics:

Occupy World: Judge Pursues Probe against Bush and Cheney*

German Group Files War Crimes Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Other CIA Officials*

International Legislators and Activists Seeking Justice for Iraqis*

U.S. Rewarded Blackwater with $200+mn Contracts after Contract to Assassinate Iraqi Official*

Long time Coming: Blackwater Mercenaries Found Guilty for Crimes against Iraqis*

Iraq’s True Liberators

The Treasure at the Heart of Iraq

Another Shoe on Behalf of Iraq, but for Bremen*