Archive | July 18, 2015

Shia Militia Reclaim Fallujah Neighbourhoods from ISIS*

Shia Militia Reclaim Fallujah Neighbourhoods from ISIS*

Iraqi Shia militias—also called Popular Mobilization Units (PMU)—have recaptured areas of ISIS controlled Fallujah in Anbar province, according to a statement released by the group Monday.

“After engaging in intense battles with the Islamic State in the town of Fallujah, our forces were able to retake control of the neighbourhoods of Albu Khanifer and Khalif Sulaiman northwest of Fallujah,” the statement claimed.

According to the statement, in an ongoing military campaign the Islamic State’s top local leader in Fallujah, named Abu Shahab Al-Orduni, was arrested.

The Iraqi government officially announced the launch of a military campaign to liberate areas under ISIS control in Anbar province.

Iraq said Sunday its forces had surrounded ISIS in Fallujah and the Anbar provincial capital Ramadi, where they had opened a corridor for civilians to flee before a planned assault begins.

“Iraqi joint forces are on the alert to liberate the embattled towns of Fallujah and Ramadi in Anbar, but no timeframe has been set yet,” Brigadier General Yahia Rasoul, a spokesman for Iraq’s Defense Ministry, told news agencies Sunday.

“The forces are considering the lives of civilians as thousands of innocents remain inside the towns,” said Rasoul of the corridor.

“In the past we were concerned about the innocent people in these areas, but for the coming military campaign we need victory at any cost.”

Meanwhile, the Anbar operations command announced a similar corridor in Fallujah.

Sunni-majority Fallujah, 69 kilometers west of Baghdad, has been under ISIS control since last summer. It has been besieged by the Iraqi army, which has been continuously shelling the city to weaken the extremists.

ISIS seized control of Ramadi in May, sending Iraqi forces racing out of the city in a major loss that came despite weeks of US-led airstrikes targeting the extremists.


Related Topics:

U.K: Tory MP Behind ISIL Oil Trade*

Pentagon and Israel behind Tunisian Ramadhan Attack*

U.S. Companies Hosting ISIS Websites and Forums*

Cheney to Face Trial for Crimes in Iraq *

ISIL fighters’ Given Death Sentences for Iraq Massacre*

Senior ISIL Commander Flees to Turkey*

Anti-ISIS Coalition Forces are U.S. Targets*

Iraqi Forces have been Busy doing what U.S. Fails to Do*

Paris Climate Change Conference shows Road to NWO Weather Control*

Paris Climate Change Conference shows Road to NWO Weather Control*

By Michael Murphy

Editor’s Note

A highly consequential global climate change conference recently took place in Paris, France.  Several concerned activists, including activist Michael Murphy, attended this meeting in order to better understand the hidden agenda behind the extraordinary drive to pass sweeping global climate legislation.  The primary stated purpose of this new regime of international laws and treaties is to exert absolute control over CO2 emissions at both the macro and micro levels throughout planet Earth.

If successful, national governments and transnational corporations everywhere will be subjected to mandates and legislation limiting their CO2 emissions and carbon production.  So will cities and towns, households and businesses.  However, carbon control is not the only purpose behind this major item on the NWO (New World Order) agenda.  In fact, there is a much greater objective concerning all of their endeavours to foist an overarching Global CO2 ‘Management’ Regime (aka One World Government) on the entire planetary civilization. The following essay reveals those true goals and clandestine purposes in some detail.

NWO Cabal Pursues Total Dominion over the Earth’s Weather and Natural Resources

The most disconcerting upshot of this conference has been well articulated by the following open letter written by Michael Murphy.  It’s clear from the various discussions in Paris with scientists and politicians from around the world that something very big is about to happen in the realm of global climate change and geo-engineering.  Many now question whether it is truly for the greater good, or just another way of controlling and taxing the people.

When Geoengineering operations are conducted via Chemtrails and HAARP around the globe 24/7 (as illustrated in the above photo), how can such destructive and ubiquitous alterations of weather patterns and climate trends be left out of the global climate change discussion?

Answer: They can’t be, except by wilful blindness and/or deliberate negligence.

Dear Fellow Chemtrail/Geoengineering Activists,

I am writing to share what I have learned, as well as express my concerns, after attending the “Our Common Future Under Climate Change” in Paris, France last week. This meeting was the precursor to a global climate agreement and global government which, if allowed to form, will essentially become a carbon dictatorship whereby every aspect of our lives will be controlled by the corporate/governmental complex. The planned signing of this global climate agreement is scheduled to occur this coming December in Paris. Upon further reflection on this past meeting, it is now clear that there is a direct correlation between geo-engineering and the climate change agendas. I now believe this to be the most important time and focus of our activism.

What is clear to many of us who attended this meeting is that we are now facing a planned agenda for the largest transfer of monetary and political power in the history of our civilization. As a matter of fact, many of us who attended the meeting as activists jokingly called the meeting “Our Communist Future Under Climate Change” due to the many profound political objectives discussed. This covert and oppressive agenda is all being perpetuated in the context of arresting global climate change, which is clearly caused to a great degree by geo-engineering but blamed almost entirely on anthropogenic CO2 emissions. As I will discuss in this letter, the following statement is very important and key to our efforts in getting geo-engineering stopped.  It is also critical in terminating the planned fiscal and political takeover that was outlined in the Paris meetings:

The IPCC Climate Model is flawed and fraudulent due to the fact that the geo-engineering practices that have been ongoing for over 60 years have not been included in the model. The stated purpose of the geo-engineering programs is to “change the climate and manipulate the weather”, therefore, there can be no accurate, definitive statement made that the planet is warming, cooling or in the midst of climate change due to CO2. To make such a statement allows for the continuation of the destructive geo-engineering programs, the deception surrounding them and the further misleading of the public. Supporting the global warming/climate change agenda has no benefit whatsoever to our efforts in getting geo-engineering stopped and also leads us into supporting the legalization of geo-engineering, as well as the worldwide transfer of wealth and power into the hands of the global elite.

“Geoengineering, through the eyes of the IPCC”

“Geoengineering, through the eyes of the IPCC”

During the conference, myself and other geo-engineering activists had the opportunity to ask several of the world’s top climate scientists if any of the ongoing weather modification and other geo-engineering programs have been included in any climate models. The answer from all who we asked was “No, geo-engineering has not been included.” We also had the opportunity to interview some of the world’s leading scientists who admitted on camera that the climate models are flawed due to these and other missing components. The question we must ask, then, is how can mandates, taxes and other fiscal/political changes be justified without a consensus on climate change, especially when the basic models are missing perhaps the largest component of our changing climate, geo-engineering? These and other interviews from the meeting will be included in my next film. (See the trailer here:

Because carbon is a primary element and CO2 is a integral component of life on our planet, all of us have a carbon footprint that can be measured, analyzed and controlled.  Consequently, CO2 has become the target compound/gas that will be mandated for reduction, taxed and used to implement various Agenda 21 and other global government objectives. A common theme at the meeting was that a global problem requires a global solution. That global solution is global government mandates, taxes and other forms of legislation (as well as various methods of implementation) that are alluded to in this letter.

As outlined at the meeting, government and scientific goals include the reduction of the planet’s temperature by two degrees. The stated means by which to do this is to reduce

  • the CO2 usage every individual on the planet, as well as
  • (ii) the carbon footprint of each nation. They (governments and corporations, scientific research and academia) are planning on doing this by implementing dramatic changes in the personal lives of individuals which most likely will include the monitoring of people via smart meters, using black boxes in cars and by other means.  Some of those will measure and limit people’s CO2 usage, as well as take aggressive measures against people who go over their daily limits.

If we support this agenda, a very likely example of a future scenario is the case of leaving a light on accidentally in our home and being monetarily fined because it constitutes a violation of a mandate that forbids us to have lights on during certain periods or for specified lengths of time during the day. Other examples of mandates are occurring in those states that currently tax people based on the mileage that they drive. This legislated policy is currently being carried out in certain states such as Oregon and could, if effective, be implemented worldwide. (Click here: Other planned mandates that have been discussed include limiting where, what days and how far we drive.)

Also, because smart meters have the ability to monitor the appliances that are used in our homes and businesses, it is likely that we will be forced to upgrade our vacuum cleaners and dishwashers, dryers and wash machines as well as other appliances to newer models that are deemed by this agenda to be appropriately “green.” If this agreement is passed, they (corporations) will have a means to control specifically what we do in our own homes, including the shutting down of our power, if and when we exceed the allotted amount of energy. This planned “carbon control dictatorship” is essentially a government/corporate carbon control matrix that will invade every aspect of our lives, even determining what products we use and how we use them.

The plan to bring a ‘world government’ to local municipalities (via Agenda 21) by way of sanctions, legal actions and other aggressive measures.

What is also concerning about this agenda is the discussion as to how to bring this global corporate/government  agenda to local governments. The term used in many of the meetings was “sustainability”, which sounds good; however, it is also the key term used to sell and soften the dictatorial and oppressive United Nations’ initiative known as Agenda 21.  This overarching agenda has clear objectives and specific goals which include the forced transfer of private lands and usurpation of property rights.  Agenda 21 also imposes the same demanding global governance objectives on local municipalities. Because of the impossibility of getting voluntary compliance at the local level, taking aggressive action toward counties and municipalities who do not conform/comply were discussed at the meeting, including the implementation of various sanctions against non-compliant entities/parties.

I was also informed during one of the implementation sessions that some foreign governments are now suing local municipalities who have refused to sign on to these burdensome global mandates. (Video footage of this will be covered in the upcoming documentary “An Unconventional Shade of Grey”) Another strategy discussed is using a global monetary fund (to be established through a massive carbon taxation regime) in order to essentially bribe developing nations with grant money to sign on to this heavy-handed agenda. As discussed in many sessions, the use of sanctions and grants are very effective tools in bringing about ‘successful’ negotiations and implementing these severe measures.  This is especially the case for those developing nations who, according to speakers at the meeting, are less likely to sign on unless given financial incentives and/or subjected to economic sanctions. Basically, we are entering an era where governments and municipalities will most likely will be forced to either accept payouts or face punishments for non-compliance.

Because the climate models are so profoundly flawed, the climate agenda is fraudulent.

If we do not address this rapidly unfolding agenda immediately, the world will soon experience the greatest transfer of financial and political power in the history of our civilization. This transformation will create massive losses and unprecedented damages to the majority of people around the world. The formation of global government according to  these agreements will most likely include the legalization of geo-engineering, elimination of the right to initiate lawsuits by removing the legal standing within the respective jurisdictions (national, state, county, city).  It will also subject the whole carbon management and taxation regime to an international tribunal for adjudication purposes.

According to information which has been released through documents related to both the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) and the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership), this upcoming global carbon control regime via world government will be controlled by those corporate interests that benefit from these and other damaging programs. Because the opposition (those who are implementing this global climate change legislation) is taking legal and legislative initiatives, it’s incumbent upon those of us who are aware of the environmental ravages of geo-engineering to vigorously oppose these steps with countervailing legal and legislative action(s). I will soon be drafting a letter to send to our political leaders and will also continue to move forward with our class action lawsuit. Any attorney who is sympathetic to this cause is invited to support our legal team in any that works for them. (See more info at

The time is now to demand an end to all climate meetings, agreements, mandates, as well as all other attempts to form an autocratic global government. The future of humanity and fate of the planet will be determined by the outcomes associated with their NWO agenda, especially to the extent thatAgenda 21 is permitted to be implemented both locally and globally.

I would like to thank all of my supporters who made my attendance at the meeting a reality, as well as thank all the other activists who attended and who brought the crucial issue of geo-engineering into the discussion with great dexterity.  Again, the importance of us all addressing this highest priority issue cannot be overstated.

Thank you for your time; your past, present and future activism; and for bringing this important message to your respective audiences. As always, Keep looking up!


Related Topics:

Freaky Weather, Climate Change, Pole Shift, or Signs of a New Era!?

Student Made to Fail because he Didn’t Promote the NWO Climate Change Myth*

House Tethers Trojan Horse of Climate Science*

Climategate: March on Climate Change vs. 1000 Int’l Conscientious Scientists*

NWO Agenda: Did You Fall for the Biggest Climate Change March?*

The Main Driver of all Weather and Climate has Gone Quiet*

Australian PM Advisor on the NWO Climate Change Hoax*

Sun’s Magnetic Field 230% Stronger and Affecting the Entire Solar System*

Geoengineering the Weather!

Chemtrails and Chembombs Cause Hurricane Isaac to Change Course

Chemtrails and Depopulation…*

Geopolitics and Chemtrails

First Politician Speaks Out on Chemtrails!

Declassified Docs Reveal Genocide Caused by Chemtrail Testing‏

A Case of Weather Control!?

Bilderberg 2015: Global Command & Control System‏*

U.S. Companies Hosting ISIS Websites and Forums*

U.S. Companies Hosting ISIS Websites and Forums*

By Shane Dixon Kavanaugh and Liran Tzach

(Photos: Dreamstime, Photo Illustration: Robert A. Di Ieso/Vocativ)

(Photos: Dreamstime, Photo Illustration: Robert A. Di Ieso/Vocativ)

Several online networks affiliated with ISIS and other extremist organizations are peddling execution videos and luring would-be jihadists with a little help from businesses based in the United States.

At least three American companies are hosting websites used by ISIS supporters, and one other Islamic terror group, to spread news, disseminate propaganda and recruit followers, an analysis by Vocativ shows. The findings come as officials in the U.S. and elsewhere aggressively seek new powers to combat jihadists online, just months after France imposed stiff measures of its own.

“What’s changed the equation is that ISIS is much more effective online than any group we’ve seen,” says James Lewis, a director with the Center For Strategic and International Studies.

Two of the American-hosted sites identified by Vocativ are filled with the highly-choreographed images and videos that promote ISIS’ brutality and military prowess, as well the group’s advances across Iraq and Syria. One of the websites, hosted by Automattic, a San Francisco-based company, also includes video tutorials on military tactics and infiltration. The other, hosted by Provo, Utah’s Blue Host, documents a group of Chechen jihadists led by Omar al-Shishani, the northern commander for ISIS, who has authority over the group’s military operations in northern Syria.

Vocativ’s analysis also found that at least one web company, Colocrossing, headquartered in Buffalo, New York, provides hosting services for a forum affiliated with Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Lebanese militant group. Forum topics on the site range from discussions on weapons and military equipment to one focused on Israel entitled “Zionist Enemy.”

Vocativ identified the hosting companies through a WHOIS search on—which provides domain names, IP addresses and other information on registered websites—and later cross-verified the companies using Host Advice, a separate query site. During its analysis, Vocativ also found that web companies in the UK, Hungary and Bulgaria hosted ISIS-affiliated sites and forums.

None of the American hosting companies identified by Vocativ responded to requests for comment. Earlier this year, a different Internet service provider based in the U.S., CloudFlare, drew the ire of hacktivist collective Anonymous, who claimed the company was “helping terrorists” by providing digital protection for ISIS propaganda and recruitment websites against cyber attacks.

Matthew Prince, the CEO of CloudFlare, told the Mirror Online that law enforcement officials were aware of the ISIS sites, but had told the company not to discontinue its services. Prince also said that, contrary to Anonymous’ claims, CloudFlare did not accept money from the terrorist group because the ISIS sites in question used a free service.

“A company should not set its policy by listening to random kids making a load of noise on Twitter,” he told the Mirror. Vocativ could not independently verify the claims against CloudFlare

Experts say these American-hosted sites present a challenge for law enforcement and intelligence officials, who must balance their efforts to combat extremist activity online with the free speech protections that extend to even terrorist groups and their sympathizers. Officials must also assess the trade-offs between keeping a terror site or forum up, which allows them to monitor its users, and trying to disband it, which closes off a recruitment channel.

“There are two things you can do with these sites. You can eavesdrop on them or shut them down,” says Martin Libicki, a cybersecurity analyst with the RAND Corporation.

“Frankly, both options are easier if the site’s hosted in the U.S.”

Libicki also says that some of these jihadist sites could be “false fronts” created by law enforcement officials to lure terrorist wannabes. Prince, CloudFlare’s CEO, suggested the same thing when he spoke to the Mirror in May.


Related Topics:

CIA Fabricates ISIL Intelligence*

ISIS Flags Found in Israel*

ISIS: A CIA Trojan Horse to Justify War Abroad and Repression at Home*

#OpISIS: Anonymous Takes Down 5,000 ISIS Accounts*

Hoaxville from Ottawa to Fake US Airdrop For ISIS

The U.S. – ISIS Can’t Get the Story Right!*

Kassig Died in a Bombing Raid before the Theatrical ISIS-U.S Beheading*

ISIS/L and European Neo-Nazis United under Pentagon’s 5th Generation Warfare*

Common Sense used to Decipher the Acronym ISIS*

Are ISIS Backers Attempting to Revive the Ailing Beast?*

Staged ISIS Beheading Video Hacked from McCain Staffer*

Former Supreme Commander of NATO said Daesh/ISIS is an Israeli Project*

Official: Most US Warplanes Never Attack ISIS/ISIL*

The Trouble with Changing your Gender*

The Trouble with Changing your Gender*

By Stella Morabito

genderEveryone has regrets. Some of us have big regrets. Most everyone has some place to go to get help dealing with them.

Except for, say, a guy who had sex-change surgery and now would like to have his penis back. (The one God gave him.)

Our culture seems pretty much “to each his own” when it comes to elective bodily mutilation and the regret thereof. And there’s a lot of regret out there. According to a British poll, a whopping 65% of those who’ve had various cosmetic surgeries regret it. People who regret their tattoos, plastic surgery, or more extreme body modifications (here’s a sad Buzzfeed pictorial on the effects of ear gauges) can read up on the Internet and find an open array of remedies. Plastic surgeons make money both puttin’ it in and takin’ it out.

Hollywood stars can speak openly about misgivings over their boob jobs and whatnot. Regarding her lip enhancement surgery, Courtney Love said:

“I just want the mouth God gave me back.”

But the difference between Love and the guy with phantom penis syndrome is that the guy isn’t allowed to talk about his regret. Not openly. The transgender lobby actively polices and suppresses discussion of sex-change regret, and claims it’s rare (no more than “5%.”) However, if you do decide to “de-transition” to once again identify with the sex in your DNA, talking about it will get you targeted by trans activists. So it’s a challenge to understand the scope of regret for sex change surgery. It’s out there, but…

‘It’s Genital Mutilation’

Let’s start with Alan Finch, a resident of Australia who decided when he was 19 to transition from male to female, and in his 20s had genital surgery. But then, at age 36, Finch told the Guardian newspaper in 2004:

. . . transsexualism was invented by psychiatrists. . . .You fundamentally can’t change sex … the surgery doesn’t alter you genetically. It’s genital mutilation. My ‘vagina’ was just the bag of my scrotum. It’s like a pouch, like a kangaroo. What’s scary is you still feel like you have a penis when you’re sexually aroused. It’s like phantom limb syndrome. It’s all been a terrible misadventure. I’ve never been a woman, just Alan . . . the analogy I use about giving surgery to someone desperate to change sex is it’s a bit like offering liposuction to an anorexic.

Finch went on to sue the Australian gender identity clinic at Melbourne’s Monash Medical Center for misdiagnosis. He also was involved in starting an outreach to others called “Gender Menders.” The reaction from the transgender community was fast, furious, and abusive, particularly in the discussion forum as described in Sheila Jeffrey’s book, “Gender Hurts.”

Since then, Finch’s outreach website has been archived and there is no further information online. In fact, Finch’s subsequent silence is the norm for those who change their minds. This is perhaps not surprising, given the vigor and vindictiveness of the transgender community in persecuting those who have the temerity to suggest that all is not well in sexual La-La Land. But if you look you can find rogue headlines every now and then that even Hollywood’s fawning over “all things trans” can’t quite control. There’s much evidence that the carefully crafted pictures of transgender “authenticity” and “happiness” are more fiction than fact.

Buried Stories of High-Profile Regret

Rene Richards and Mike Penner remain fairly well known as male-to-female transgenders, the former from the 1970s and the latter recently. Both have stories of misgivings and sorrows that cannot be explained away through the old standard “it’s-society’s-fault” routinely trotted out by the transgender lobby.

Tennis champion Rene Richards was one of the first to go through sex-change surgery and was something of a sensation in the 1970s. As such, you might expect Richards to be a tower of strength, offering encouragement to those in similar circumstances today. Well, not so much. This is what Richards had to say in an excerpt from a March 1999 interview attributed to Tennis Magazine (unavailable in full online):

If there was a drug that I could have taken that would have reduced the pressure, I would have been better off staying the way I was—a totally intact person. I know deep down that I’m a second-class woman. I get a lot of inquiries from would-be transsexuals, but I don’t want anyone to hold me out as an example to follow. Today there are better choices, including medication, for dealing with the compulsion to cross dress and the depression that comes from gender confusion. As far as being fulfilled as a woman, I’m not as fulfilled as I dreamed of being. I get a lot of letters from people who are considering having this operation…and I discourage them all.’ —Rene Richards, “The Liaison Legacy,” Tennis Magazine, March 1999.

A 2007 New York Times interview, “The Lady Regrets,” describes Richards’ temperament this way: “… as she wearies of the interview, her body language seems to become more traditionally male, suggesting an athlete who is wearying of the game.”

Penner’s story is even more tragic. In April 2007, Penner, a Los Angeles Times sportswriter for 24 years, announced in a stunning column that he would come back from vacation as “Christine Daniels.” He then wrote a blog, “Woman in Progress,” as he lived as a woman and served as a spokesperson for transgender activism.

But then, with no explanation, Penner decided in 2008 to de-transition. He readopted his byline, Mike Penner, and lived again as a man. All blog posts and bylines by Christine Daniels were mysteriously scrubbed from the LA Times website. Penner discussed none of it. But according to one report, he was devastated over not being able to save his marriage. Then tragically, in November 2009, Penner killed himself. The funeral for Penner was strictly private to keep out media. The LGBT community had their own memorial service, but only for “Christine Daniels,” not Mike Penner.

Another heart-wrenching story, of a female-to-male transgender, is that of Nancy Verhelst in Belgium. She was aghast after her surgery, saying she felt more like a “monster” than a man. She also spoke of her sad childhood, in which her mother rejected her in favour of her brothers, and isolated little Nancy in a room over the garage. Nancy was so distraught that she asked doctors to put her to death under Belgium’s lax euthanasia laws. They coldly complied.

Trying to Drown the Iceberg

These stories may be the tip of the proverbial iceberg. There are many such scattered about, and you can see my blog for supplementation. No doubt they’re not widely reported because they don’t fit the “transgender-as-paragon-of-personal-courage” narrative so popular in the media today. But there’s also that element of active suppression by the trans activists.

Take, for example, one Reddit thread entitled “Grieving” from “m2f2m” (male-to-female-to-male) which generated a reader’s friendly warning to let him know that his subreddit was reported to the “transphobia project” which “has a habit of invading linked threads with its own method of education which includes name-calling and downvotes.” In fact, it looks like that’s been deleted. But here’s a poignant excerpt from m2f2m’s painfully honest blog:

I am grieving at how I have mutilated my body. . . . In the case of my surgeon, he seemed all too happy to cut off my testicles, as soon as he had a couple of glowing letters from my doctor and former therapist, saying what a nice lady I had become, how well I had ‘assimilated’ etc. Fuckin crazy. Anyway, I’ve been cryin’.

See also this Reddit conversation that seems to confirm both how common trans doubts and regrets are, and how threatened transgender activists are by them:

[–]PrairieFlame 3 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the links. This sub has been pretty dead, but /r/gender_critical has got a lot of activity.

[–]Guyrl[S] 2 points 3 months ago

It has been, and that’s too bad. The perspectives of people who have detransitioned has been the most helpful thing for me right now.

[–]thirdwaytrans 2 points 3 months ago

I’m so glad you find my perspectives helpful. It makes them worth writing!

[–]grvsmth 0 points 7 days ago

Too bad /r/gender_critical is so intolerant of any non-essentialist critiques of gender, huh?

[–]Guyrl[S] 0 points 3 months ago

I linked to this post in r/asktransgender in a post by someone wondering if they should detransition and asking for advice, and it got me banned.

[–]thirdwaytrans 0 points 3 months ago

Welcome to the banned club! I really worry about all of the people that are questioning and then people are actively censoring any alternate information.

[–]Guyrl[S] 0 points 3 months ago

Haha thanks I suppose. I don’t understand how anyone would want to limit their perspective so militantly. Especially given the severity and permanence of decisions concerning transitioning. I myself am terrified of the thoughts and feelings I’ve been having about my gender identity and want to consider all possible aspects and angles before making a decision. I didn’t think detransition was such a threat to people in that community.

Reddit censorship is also discussed on this blog called Third Way Trans.

A Survivor’s Mission to Reach Out to Regretters

While conversations like the above go on—and are suppressed—some brave souls push to get the word out about the potential for regret and other consequences far more severe.

Walt Heyer is perhaps the most active among the survivors out there, and possibly the most vilified by transgender activists. He is a clear-eyed and gentle man, now in his 70s, who had sex reassignment surgery and lived as a woman for many years. Because of the devastation sown by the gender confusion, Heyer offers information and support in blogs called and transdetransition.

Heyer has also authored three relevant books: “Paper Genders,” “Gender, Lies and Suicide,” and “Trading My Sorrows” that provide resources to understand the destructive effects of gender confusion. He cites, for example, a national survey of more than 6,500 transgenders that asked the question, “Have you tried to commit suicide?” Forty-one percent answered, “Yes.” One need look no further for compelling evidence of widespread transgender and sex change regret.

A Bit of Honesty from Sweden

A Swedish study from 2003 found that post-operative mortality and suicide rates for transsexuals are many times higher than the general population. And that’s in Sweden, probably the friendliest environment on the planet for transgender individuals.

Also out of Sweden is a 2010 documentary entitled “Regretters” in which two older Swedish men who each lived as a woman for many years decided to go back to their male identities. (The film has made the rounds at various LGBT events, interesting given its controversial nature.) I recently watched Regretters on YouTube with English subtitles, but that option is no longer available. I hope you can still watch a subtitled trailer here. A few more subtitled excerpts are available in this three-minute discussion with the director.

In “Regretters,” one of the men, Mikael, describes how he felt immediately upon seeing the results of the surgery and his penis gone. He rues aloud: “I was devastated. What have I done? What on earth have I done?” In the full version he explains how he cried and would have likely changed his mind if the doctor simply asked him just before the surgery if he was certain about it. Mikael also explained that he was always painfully shy towards women and never felt he could find someone who would date him or marry him. So—starved for a woman and fearful of rejection—he concluded that he needed to be a woman.

The other man, Orlando, who still looks and dresses androgynously, stated he was “shocked” to see his penis gone after the surgery. Absolutely shocked. Orlando passed very nicely as a woman and managed to trick a man who wanted children into marrying him. Orlando describes his many machinations in covering up, but after a decade the truth came out and the “marriage” ended.

A Coming Wave of Regret?

Thanks to the courage of the people who speak out, these regrets have been getting more attention in recent years. A British man who regrets his surgery recently claimed that there has not been enough psychiatric counseling of patients. He is now pressing the National Health Service to reverse his surgery. Britain’s youngest patient –much touted in the press for his courage in changing to a female—has also spoken out. Bradley Cooper begged his family for years, then finally got the go-ahead to switch at age 17. But after a year of living as a woman, he found the whole thing “overwhelming” and cancelled the surgery. Another story appeared on Huffington Post here. Radical feminist Julie Bindel wrote an article, The Operation that Can Ruin Your Life.”

A few voices within the transgender community seem to expect a coming wave of regretters. Consider this excerpt from a March 2014 report by an Australian transgender activist, entitled: “Coming Trend within the Trans Community, including Doubts and Regrets:”

Yes, there are several well documented cases of regret or de-transition. . . . Most however, hide their dissatisfaction and de-transition in stealth, with the outcome that the true numbers will never be known. This is most unfortunate, as we need to understand these problems that they face and why it is happening more over time. I am not just alluding to Australia, but the World at large if we are to understand what causes us to have doubts and regrets.

Finally, Sundog Pictures, a well-known UK documentary production house, seems to have been exploring the possibility of a documentary on the phenomenon of sex change regret. But chances are you won’t be hearing about it.

Consider this October 2014 blog post at “No I will not Help Sundog Make a Documentary about Trans ‘Regret’ which reacts to a letter of inquiry about the project from a Sundog representative. “NotRightRuth” scolded and lashed out against Sundog Pictures for its interest and stated that such a documentary would be “harmful” to the trans-agenda. A number of followers retweeted it here.

If Sundog Pictures is indeed interested, that’s yet another indication that sex-change regret is far deeper and broader than reported. But with or without a new documentary, murmurs of regret are liable to get louder. Biological truth has a way of outing itself. The hard reality of it is written right into our DNA as “male” or “female.” In the end, transgender activists and their media enablers won’t be able to drown that massive iceberg.


Related Topics:

British Children as Young as 3 Referred for Transgender Treatment*

Norway Bill Would let Kids Change their Sex at Age 7*

To Have Your Life Scripted for a Global Agenda*

Raised by Transgendered Parent, but against Transgendered Adoption*

European Parliament asks WHO to remove transgender from Manual of Disorders*

Member States Object to UN Reproductive Rights Agenda*

UN Passes ‘unprecedented’ Pro-family Resolution, Outraging Sex Liberators*

The Elite’s Cultural Marxist Agenda

National Education Association Long Campaign for Gay ‘Marriage’*

The Frankfurt School*

Thousands Rally in Rome to defend Natural Family and against Gender Theory*

American College of Paediatricians Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage was a ‘A Tragic Day for America’s Children’*

Consciousness Science Kept Hidden*

Top Sheriff says America is Now Ruled by the ‘Oligarchy’*

Nigerian Bishops Western LGBT Imperialism*

E.U. Making Paedophilia Legal Across Europe*

The Words ‘Husband’ and ‘wife’ to become Illegal in US*

AMA Threatens Outspoken Holistic Doctors*

AMA Threatens Outspoken Holistic Doctors*

By Allison Reed

If it was not already clear that natural medicine was in the cross-hairs of organized medicine, it certainly is now. Recently, the American Medical Association (AMA) began crafting its ‘ethical guidelines for physicians in the media’ to ‘defend the integrity of the profession.’  The new guidelines will target unorthodox medical information that the AMA deems dubious and unsubstantiated and create disciplinary guidelines for doctors who make public claims that do not align with the ‘best available science’.

On the surface, these ethical guidelines may sound like a responsible way of discouraging doctors from making vague or erroneous statements and claims. A closer look, however, finds that the AMA is actually attempting to censor the free speech of doctors in media who draw attention to holistic medicine rather than the traditional Western treatments and medicines typically promoted by the pharmaceutical industry and conventional medicine.

The AMA continues to monopolize Western medicine and silence opponents

The American Medical Association is a powerful organization that uses the brunt of its influence to manipulate healthcare in America. In fact, the AMA spent nearly $20 million on lobbying in 2014 alone. Its roots go deep into American medicine, and it has a powerful influence over the way state licensing boards oversee and discipline physicians in the U.S.

The new ethical guidelines will make recommendations for how state boards might discipline doctors who are public figures or make statements in the media that do not align with the AMA’s stance on medical treatment. Those who helped craft the guidelines call doctors who support natural medicine ‘quacks’, and specifically name Dr. Oz as one of the physicians making bogus claims based on pseudoscience.

Interestingly, a look at the Doctor Oz website or one of his televised shows tends to reveal the opposite is true. Dr. Oz tends to recommend healthy lifestyles and natural remedies. He also encourages his viewers to eat whole foods and avoid processed foods and sugar to achieve better health. Yet organized medicine managed to call him before a senate committee to answer for ‘flowery speech’ and ‘unscientific claims’ he has made on his talk show.

Watch out: The health of Americans is at stake

Censorship is the easiest way for big pharma and organized medicine to maintain their monopoly on Western medicine. These new ethical guidelines will restrict American access to valuable natural health information and funnel people into the offices of traditional healthcare providers who will support traditional medical science rather than holistic medicine. Organized medicine would like nothing more than to continue lining their pockets with the profits generated by Americans who are dependent on medications rather than taking charge of their own health and wellness.

Kids Flee Deadly Vaccine by David DeesWhat will happen to doctors who stand by their beliefs rather than cave to the AMA? Will a physician be stripped of his license for deviating from the CDC’s mandated vaccine schedule? Will doctors be fined for recommending any course of alternative medicine that is not considered acceptable to those in power?

It is important to remember that the AMA is not a licensing or regulatory body – the states are. We must remind our lawmakers that freedom of speech is a fundamental right and demand that they not accept the AMA’s ethical guidelines, which themselves are unethical for the American people.


Related Topics:

First Bankers, now Alternative Doctors go Missing or Found Dead*

Criminalizing Healthy Food Paves Way for TPP*

U.K. Doctors Want NHS Out of TTIP Now*

Deadline to Keep Homeopathy as a Health Choice*

Falling Profits and Desperate Junk Food Companies Make Fun of Healthy Diets*

Take More Responsibility for Your Health

U.K: Your Health is No Longer Your Choice!

Synthetic Proteins: Cascading Effects of U.S. Unhealthy Food

Gates and Monsanto and the “Doomsday” Seed Vault*

From the Seed – Dinner Table, to be under EU Control

Prophet Muhammad Said It, Now Top Doctors are Saying It*

The Man Who Forgot to Die and Outlived all his Doctors*

The Doctor Who Prescribes Fruit and Veg. Instead of Drugs*

Biotech Takeover of African Seed Companies*

Six Companies Have Patented 76% of the Global Seed Market*

Sowing Seeds of Health, Hope and Humanity*

Amazonian Hunter-Gatherers Isolated from Western Medicine Have the Most Diverse Microbiome Ever Recorded*