Archive | July 24, 2015

Dolphins Spotted Riding Whales*

Dolphins Spotted Riding Whales*

No matter how bad things get, nature reminds us that play is a part of the process…

We’ve always talked about how dolphins and whales exist at a high level of awareness, but it seems they are far closer in friendship than we might have previously thought!

Recently, off of the coast of Hawaii, dolphins have actually been spotted RIDING WHALES! 

Almost as if it’s a game, the dolphin would basically test how long it could stay balanced on the humpback whale’s head as he went swimming along. Eventually, the dolphin would slide down the whales back, tail first, and then once again jump back up on its head for another ride.

The photograph above that sparked all of the buzz about this phenomemon was taken by Marine Biologist Lori Mazzuca in Hawaii, and started the public discussion on the facebook page The Whale and Dolphin People Project.

As scientists, “play” was the best understanding they could come up with to explain the activity!

Soon after that, even more pictures of dolphins and whales playing together started popping up all over the place. Take a look at the video below!

Dolphins and whales have now joined in the list of other animals that have started to play together whom before we imagined were not very close. Do you remember the dog playing with the crow? Or the squirrel playing with the cat? 

Just as humans are learning to work together, and create more meaningful bonds with each other, so too are the animals learning to play and be together as the one universal family that we really are all a part of.


Related Topics:

1,000 Dolphins Stampede Southern California*

Whales: Our Death Causing Petro-chemical Lives

An Occupied World: The Blue Whale

New Federal Bill Lowers Standards on Poor Standards for Experimental Vaccine Licensing*

New Federal Bill Lowers Standards on Poor Standards for Experimental Vaccine Licensing*

TPP preparedness: Huge guaranteed profits…

If you wanted a large uptake in the population is this the way to go?


By Barbara Loe Fisher

It has only been a few weeks since the forced vaccination lobby rammed a bill (SB 277) through the California legislature eliminating the personal belief vaccine exemption so children will have to get dozens of doses of federally recommended vaccines or be denied a school education. While California was being subjected to one of the most aggressive and expensive state lobbying campaigns2 ever mounted by the pharmaceutical industry in partnership with medical trade associations funded by industry and government that same lobby was pulling an even bigger fast one on the American people in Washington, D.C.

Here comes the 21st Century Cures Act, which is a Pharma-driven bill blessed by the FDA that seriously compromises the integrity of the FDA drug and vaccine licensing process. The 362-page bill sailed through the U.S. House of Representatives on July 10, 2015 and mandates that about $9 billion dollars be given to NIH to develop more drugs and vaccines and $550 million be given to the FDA to fast track products to market.

Bill Lowers FDA Licensing Standards

The bill allows the FDA to lower licensing standards for testing of experimental drugs, medical devices and “biological products” – a category that includes vaccines –so companies will no longer be required to conduct large, case controlled clinical trials to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Instead, FDA can accept novel statistical analyses and “clinical experience,” such as anecdotal evidence from patients.

It is interesting that clinical experience and anecdotal evidence will constitute “good science” for the purpose of demonstrating a vaccine is safe before it is licensed, while clinical experience and anecdotal evidence has never been good enough to demonstrate that a vaccine is unsafe after it is licensed.

Greasing Skids to License Drugs and Vaccines

The 21st Century Cures Act is being sold as a way for the FDA to quickly license experimental pharmaceutical products for people suffering with rare or life threatening diseases, whether or not those products have been adequately tested. However, greasing the FDA licensure skids to make experimental drugs available for the sick and dying, who voluntarily choose to use them, is one thing, while greasing the skids to bum rush experimental vaccines to licensure that government will legally require healthy children and adults to buy and use, is something quite different.

Nearly every single vaccine that the pharmaceutical industry creates and the FDA licenses for child use is eventually recommended for all children and mandated by state governments for day-care and school entry.

And, now, many adults are being brought into the vaccine mandate net as well.

Ensuring Drugs and Vaccines Dominate U.S. Health Care

Coming on the heels of the Affordable Health Care Act, which guaranteed that the pharmaceutical industry and their products will continue to dominate the most expensive health care system in the world, there are so many breathtaking ways the 21st Century Cures Act will endanger the public health that it is hard to know where to begin. The word “vaccines” is not being publicly uttered by anyone sponsoring the bill. However, the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), which represents more than 1,500 pharmaceutical and other health product corporations, is already crowing about how they managed to influence Capitol Hill politicians to incorporate the “Vaccine Access, Certainty and Innovation Act of 2015” into the 21st Century Cures Act.47 48

Read NVIC’s press release by clicking the image to the right.

Faster Track for Vaccines You Will Have to Take in Future

So, if the Senate approves and the President signs this life-threatening bill into law by the end of this year, what will happen to the hundreds of experimental vaccines that will be fast tracked to licensure and mandated for you and your children to get in the future? Just so you know, that list includes vaccines for HIV/AIDS, chlamydia, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis C, genital herpes, syphilis, gonorrhea, e-coli, norovirus, tuberculosis, and many, many more.

Gutting Informed Consent Along with Science

First, the 21st Century Cures Act allows the FDA to expedite licensure of new vaccines and expand uses for existing vaccines based on:

  1. Shorter or smaller clinical trials; and
  2. non-traditional or adaptive trial designs and Bayesian methods of data analysis;66 and
  3. evidence from clinical experience instead of randomized, controlled clinical trials;67 68 and
  4. use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoint measures69 rather than actual clinical endpoints proving effectiveness.70

Second, the new law would allow researchers to conduct “clinical testing” of experimental pharmaceutical products on people without first obtaining their informed consent if “the proposed clinical testing poses no more than minimal risk.” It is not clear who decides what constitutes “minimal risk,” but presumably that will be left up to industry and government officials. It is also not clear whether minor children can be enrolled in experiments without the informed consent of their parents.

Using “Best Guess” Statistics Instead of Good Science

Just for fun, I looked up the definition of Bayesian to see what will happen if the FDA lets drug companies use that method instead of large randomized clinical trials to determine whether an experimental vaccine is safe or not. Here is what the dictionary says about Bayesian:

“Being, relating to, or involving statistical methods that assign probabilities or distributions to events or parameters based on experience or best guesses before experimentation and data collection and that apply Bayes’ theorem to revise the probabilities and distributions after obtaining experimental data.

The key phrase to focus on is “based on experience or best guesses before experimentation or data collection.” While we know federal agencies have been guessing for a long time when it comes to pronouncing vaccines safe and effective due to long standing gaps in vaccine safety science, it is irresponsible for Congress to bow to Big Pharma and codify into law the legal right for FDA officials to use flimsy “best guess” statistical methods and unreliable surrogate endpoints to support claims that a new vaccine is safe and really works, instead of requiring vaccine manufacturers to conduct in-depth biological mechanism research and large, well-designed clinical trials.

Moving numbers around in a computer is a poor substitute for actually proving an experimental vaccine does not kill and injure real human beings before it is licensed.

Congress and Pharma: Friends with Benefits

In 1986, Congress allowed itself to be blackmailed by the pharmaceutical industry and removed most civil product liability from vaccine manufacturers and, in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court declared vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe” and completely removed all product liability from FDA licensed vaccines. In America, nobody can sue drug companies when FDA licensed vaccines injure and kill people.

Not satisfied with a total product liability shield and with access to billions of dollars in American taxpayer money to build new vaccine plants and create hundreds of new vaccines, while getting government-paid free advertising and enjoying a predictable market from “no exceptions” vaccine mandates, the pharmaceutical industry is now insisting that Congress give them a free pass on the science, too.

A Consumer’s Worst Nightmare

The financial public private partnership that Congress has directed government to forge with industry through a series of federal laws created over the past 30 years, is a drug company stockholder’s dream and a consumer’s worst nightmare. That lucrative partnership, which is using the “greater good” club to violate the human and civil rights of the American people in the name of a highly politicized “War on Disease,” has the potential to destroy more lives than any war our nation has ever fought.

The 21st Century Cures Act is a prescription for disaster. Vaccine research, development and fast tracking should not be a part of it.

Act Now

If you want to make your U.S. Senator and Representative aware of what you think of the 21st Century Cures Act, become a user of the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal. The Portal can put you in immediate electronic contact with the people you elected to represent you in Washington, D.C. so you can politely, of course, give them a piece of your mind.

Stand up for your right to know and freedom to choose.

It’s your health. Your family. Your choice.


Related Topics:

The WHO’s Private Vaccine Laboratory*

March 2015: 117 Vaccine Injuries and Deaths*

Where else, but U.S.: Vaccine Bills That Remove Consent and Incarcerate the Infected

$63 Million to Brain-Damaged Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine*

Damages of £120,000 Awarded for Narcolepsy Caused by Swine Flu Vaccine*

Mandatory Vaccines for Californian Schools*

African-American Autism and Vaccines*

European Medicines Agency Investigating HPV Vaccines*

Australia, Forced Vaccines, and Ethnic Cleansing*

A Brazilian Converted His Motorcycle to Run On Water!*

A Brazilian Converted His Motorcycle to Run On Water!*

Who knows what’s going to happen, but if you need transport the human mind is full of inventive ideas..

By John Vibes

For decades there have been stories about vehicles that could run on water, and now we can actually see one of these vehicles in action. The T Power H20 motorbike was developed in Sao Paulo, Brazil by a man named Ricardo Azevedo.

The motorcycle can travel up to 310 miles on just a litre of water, and it does not require any specific type of water. Azevedo has even demonstrated how the motorcycle works using polluted water from a nearby river.

The motorcycle works by combining a battery with a water combustion system that helps to generate electricity.

In the video demonstrating his invention, Azevedo uses clean water to power the bike and drinks it on camera to show that it is not fuel.

“The advantage of this motorcycle, which works with the hydrogen that comes from the water, is that the result that comes out of the exhaust is water vapour. This is different from gasoline, which the result is carbon monoxide,Azevedo said.

Azevedo’s invention could entirely change the transportation industry, but he should be careful because inventors like him have been discredited and even killed in the past. The best way to keep Azevedo and his invention safe is to spread the word about it so it is more difficult for competing interests to sweep it under the rug.


Related Topics:

Ethiopia: Harvesting Clean Water from the Air*

The Privatization of Water*

Creating 1,000 Liters of Drinking Water from Air!*

Student Uses Solar Energy to Purify Water*

Water Pipes that Generate Electricity in Portland*

The Yin and Yang of Water*

Crime against Humanity: Providing Clean Water in Africa*

UK’s “Anti-extremism” Plan Brings Repression at Home and War Abroad*

UK’s “Anti-extremism” Plan Brings Repression at Home and War Abroad*

A UK Bishop Warns Of ‘A Slide Towards Ever Greater State Control’ as Pressure Mounts On Christians*. Christian values and institutions have been under pressure from the homosexual normalization process that has been taking place in the U.K., but it doesn’t just pertain to Christians. Enter the so-called The Multinational Ramadhan Assault* (ignoring Pentagon and Israel behind Tunisian Ramadhan Attack*), and Cameron has been on the propaganda train whilst waging war in Syria without Parliament approval. So now without providing Christians and Muslims with a common goal so that they can remain enemies to further drag a growing anti-government population under an expanding policed state which also silences the opposition on many matters including the paedophilia scandal that just won’t go away…

By Chris Marsden

Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron chose Ninestiles School in Birmingham to outline a five-year plan to address “extremism” earlier this week.

The legislation he intends to implement will target Muslims and encourage anti-Muslim sentiment. More broadly, measures to be enacted against Islamic extremism can also be used against any form of oppositional sentiment within the population. They mark a sharp shift towards nationalism, in part directed against political dissent but also in preparation for stepped up military aggression.

In the name of building “a stronger, more cohesive society,” Cameron defined virtually any oppositional sentiment as impermissible. Britain was depicted as an ideal “multi-faith” democracy where “in one or two generations people can come with nothing and rise as high as their talent allows”—“without a shadow of doubt, a beacon to the world.”

Making clear that he was intent on criminalising free speech, Cameron insisted,

“You don’t have to support violence to subscribe to certain intolerant ideas which create a climate in which extremists can flourish.”

These “ideas” included being “hostile to basic liberal values such as democracy, freedom and sexual equality,” promoting “discrimination, sectarianism and segregation,” and any assertion that “Western powers, in concert with Israel, are deliberately humiliating Muslims, because they aim to destroy Islam.”

Cameron denied that there was any material or political basis for the spread of Islamic fundamentalism. It was simply attractive to the young and confused, he asserted, drawing a parallel with–and at the same time equating—“other ideologies, whether fascist or communist.”

“Some argue it’s because of historic injustices and recent wars,” he said, citing the Iraq war, “or because of poverty and hardship. This argument, what I call the grievance justification, must be challenged.”

In a more than usually stupid tautology, he pontificated, “The root cause of the threat we face is the extremist ideology itself.”

The central answer to such extremism, he insisted, was to tackle

“the question of identity… we have to confront a tragic truth that there are people born and raised in this country who don’t really identify with Britain…”

To reinforce a sense of British identity, he declared, without obvious embarrassment, that “our strongest weapon” was

“our own liberal values… We are all British. We respect democracy and the rule of law. We believe in freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of worship, equal rights regardless of race, sex, sexuality or faith… These are British values, and are underpinned by distinct British institutions.”

This comes from the head of a government that has either enacted or defended a raft of anti-democratic legislation curtailing essential freedoms, engaged in mass surveillance of the internet and phone communications of every man, woman and child in Britain, and is now intent on using this intelligence to impose a regime based upon the Orwellian concept of “thought crime.”

To underscore his hypocrisy, Cameron’s speech was made the same day Defence Secretary Michael Fallon addressed MPs in an attempt to justify the government covertly agreeing to British pilots taking part in bombing raids in Syria in defiance of two parliamentary votes. (See: UK defence secretary admits flouting parliamentary ban on military involvement in Syrian war )

“[W]e need our internet companies to go further in helping us identify potential terrorists online,” he insisted.

“Many of their commercial models are built around monitoring platforms for personal data, packaging it up and selling it on to third parties… But when it comes to doing what’s right in the fight against terrorism, we too often hear that it’s all too difficult. Well I’m sorry—I just don’t buy that.”

Cameron went on to press the required buttons to legitimise the targeting of all Muslims.

“In the past, governments have been too quick to dismiss the religious aspect of Islamist extremism,” he said.

“But simply denying any connection between the religion of Islam and the extremists doesn’t work, because these extremists are self-identifying as Muslims.”

No longer would “fear of causing offence” stop the state from confronting “the horrors of forced marriage,” “female genital mutilation” (FGM), etc. “More prosecutions,” he bayed. “No more turning a blind eye on the false basis of cultural sensitivities.”

To indicate the scale of this state offensive to impart “British values”, Cameron called for “a review of sharia courts,” toughened regulations “so schools have to report children who go missing from school rolls mid-year,” legislating for “authorities to seize the passports of people they suspect are planning on taking girls abroad for FGM,” and “lifetime anonymity for victims of forced marriage.”

The whole of society would be marshalled in this campaign of spying on and “civilising” Muslims. “We need everyone—government, local authorities, police, schools, all of us—to enforce our values right across the spectrum.”

He complained that universities, because they “are bastions of free speech and incubators of new and challenging ideas… sometimes… fail to see the creeping extremism on their campuses.”

These efforts must “tackle both parts of the creed—the non-violent and violent,” and would target numerous Imams—described here as “facilitators and cult leaders” to “stop them peddling their hatred,” as well as by imposing internet censorship.

To Muslim “community leaders”, he offered a cash incentive for being co-opted by and working with the government.

“If you’re interested in reform; if you want to challenge the extremists in our midst; if you want to build an alternative narrative or if you just want to help protect your kids—we are with you and we will back you—with practical help, with funding, with campaigns, with protection and with political representation,”

Cameron stated.

“Our Great British resolve faced down Hitler; it defeated Communism; it saw off the IRA’s assaults on our way of life,” he concluded. “Time and again we have stood up to aggression and tyranny… And we shall do so again.”

Cameron’s vision of society in fact owes a great deal to Hitlerite fascism—in the use of religious and ethnic scape-goating in the name of upholding “One nation”—or perhaps “Ein Volk, Ein Reich”—values to legitimise an assault on democratic rights and an ongoing drive to war.

Just over a week before his diatribe in Birmingham, Cameron outlined the other prong of his campaign against “extremism”, asking the UK’s Defence Chiefs to invest more resources on “readily deployable counter-terrorist capabilities” in a defence review scheduled for the autumn.

According to the government’s website, Cameron said,

“This could include more spy planes, drones and Special Forces,”

“to protect the UK from evolving threats, be that terrorism, extremism, or an increasingly aggressive Russia and whether that threat is physical or in cyberspace.”

On July 13, Cameron visited RAF Waddington, it added,

“from where Reaper missions are flown over Iraq and Syria… Tornados and Reapers alone have flown over 1,000 missions and struck over 300 ISIL targets. This afternoon, the Prime Minister welcomed some of the ship’s company of the new HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier to Downing Street. The Prime Minister is keen for the defence review to explore how best to work with partners like the US to ensure these ships, which will be the largest British warships ever built, will be able to project drones, Special Forces and strike capabilities to wherever the terrorist threat is found.”

The government is expected to move a motion extending British bombing operations from Iraq into Syria when parliament resumes in September. Of course anyone claiming that such actions help foster Islamic fundamentalist sentiment will no doubt be accused of employing “the grievance justification.”


Related Topics:

Fears of a British Policed State Rising Midst the Elite Paedophile Scourge*

UK Schools Are Making Muslim Children Take ‘Counter Extremism’ Tests*

U.K. Lifts Restrictions on Arms to Israel*

U.K: Tory MP Behind ISIL Oil Trade*

Britain is arming Saudi Arabia in Yemen Conflict*

British Pilots Bombing Syria in Secret*

U.K. Cyber Brigade Serves to Spread Lies on Social Networks*

A Day after the U.K. Elections Protestors Marched on Westminster*

U.K. Placing Justice Beyond Reach*

Quest to Kill Human Rights Act in U.K.*

Elite Powerbrokers Behind Sweeping Censorship in U.K.*

Genetic Testing or U.K. Population Surveillance*

U.K.: Can you Cut Public Spending to 1930s Level with 2014-18 Cost of Living?*

U.K. Free School to Close for Allowing God into the Curriculum*

Religious Schools Face Closure if they don’t Promote Homosexuality*

Why is the Legalization of Gay Marriage so Important to the Queen?*