What can be made of this Royal Conundrum?*
Europe’s royal élites are fragmenting over their Nazi-continuum connections with the Committee of 300
On Monday 20th February 2012, confirmatory intelligence emerged from Japan (here) that, below the surface, a widening rift in geopolitical loyalties is developing between the older and younger members of the British Royal Family bloodlines.
This rift is understood to be developing and extending through most of the European Illuminati hereditary control-structures, not just in the UK, but also in countries such as The Netherlands, Spain and Sweden.
What is being referred to as the Gnostic Illuminati power-group issued a Saturday 31st March 2012 deadline to the Western G5 banking cartel’s Committee of 300, to cease and desist in its Nazi-continuum (Odessa Group) agenda of financial theft and international exploitation.
The Committee of 300 agenda was being implemented through secretly-constructed financial instruments and money laundries, and through wars, invasions and state-sponsored terrorist atrocities such as the post-WW2 conflicts in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya and Yemen, and the false-flag attacks of 911 (pre-planned demolition of Twin Towers in New York – more here) and 311 (the pre-planned nuclear tsunami in Japan – more here).
This Nazi-continuum agenda is still driving the financial nexus and the foreign policies of the G5 nations (UK, US, Germany, France and Italy).
The Gnostic Illuminati powergroup is of ancient lineage, and through its spokesman, Alexander Romanov (Romanoff), claims to have initiated the American Revolution (1775–83), the French Revolution (1787–1799) and the Russian Revolution (1917). More here (07.01.12 – YouTube video – 7 mins).
Romanov has also said that Prince Harry of Wales (British Royal Family; fifth in line of succession to the British Throne) has been keeping in touch with the Gnostic Illuminati group and has agreed to take over control of the British Royal family from Queen Elizabeth II when she is obliged to abdicate in connection with her covert Chairmanship of the Committee of 300 and other geopolitical machinations. More here (01.01.12), here (29.04.11) and here(19.10.09).
One of the reasons that the Gnostic Illuminati are working with Prince Harry, is thought to be that this particular member of the British Royal Family is not a scion (or issue) of the Nazi-continuum, German-English, reptilian bloodline Houses of Windsor and Saxe-Coburg & Gotha. In this, Harry is unlike his brother, William (Duke of Cambridge), or his father, Charles (Prince of Wales). Charles is the heir apparent (first in line of succession) and William is second in line of succession to the British Throne.
This difference in Prince Harry’s bloodline is due to the (now) widely-known fact that he is not Prince Charles’ son. Prince Harry is the son of Diana Spencer (Princess Diana) and James Hewitt, a young army officer, horse trainer and polo player. More here (31.05.09). And a picture of Diana Spencer and James Hewitt together can be seen here.
Prince Harry of Wales is not, therefore, the biological son of Prince Charles, or the biological grandson of Queen Elizabeth II of England. However, for reasons of public relations expediency, he was given a full royal name and rank at his christening in St George’s Chapel, Windsor, on Friday 21st December 1984. Prince Harry of Wales’ full name is Henry Charles Albert David Windsor. In long-established English usage, Henry = Harry.
The absence of Prince Philip, Queen Elizabeth’s husband, from Prince Harry’s official christening photograph, is considered to be highly significant. Among the English aristocracy it is normative for the grandfather of the child being christened to feature in the official photograph. Philip had been present two years earlier for the family christening photographs of Harry’s older brother, Prince William. That service was held on Wednesday 4th August 1982 in the Music Room at Buckingham Palace. The official christening photographs associated with the event can be seen here and here.
In Establishment English Protestant Churchianity (Church of England), a christening is an infant baptism conducted without the informed consent of the infant involved. It is an ancient Satanic rite designed to close the ajna centre (the sixth primary chakram) of the developing child. The officiating priest sprinkles the forehead of the infant with “holy water” and makes the sign of the cross (the sign of closure) over the ajna centre.
Closure of this trans-dimensional data portal in the spiritual body restricts the individual’s access to positive spiritual energies from The Higher Evolution. It also makes the growing child more susceptible to control by low-vibration negative manipulation energies entering through chakras lower down in the spiritual body. The ajna centre can be reopened in later life by positive spiritual practices such as creative visualisation, yoga or benign meditation techniques.
A long-time employee of Prince Harry’s mother, Princess Diana, has revealed that the British Royal Family has been involved for many years in a media and intelligence cover-up of Harry’s origins.
Diana knew that Harry’s father was James Hewitt, and talked about it frequently in private. This is said to be one reason why she was assassinated in 1997, following a manufactured Paris car crash, by Tavistock-linked agents (K-Team Geneva) of the London Crown Temple. More about the Tavistock Institute can be found here, and about the London Crown Temple here or here.
Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (Queen Elizabeth’s husband), is reported to have issued explicit death threats to James Hewitt if he refused to go along with the royal cover-up. In particular, Philip made Hewitt lie about the timeline of his relationship with Diana, Princess of Wales.
James Hewitt was in an active sexual relationship with Diana two years before Prince Harry was born. It is understood that Diana had stopped having sex with Prince Charles about eighteen months before Harry was born because of her disgust at the active relationship her husband was continuing with Camilla Parker-Bowles.
Parker-Bowles has now been officially re-branded as the Duchess of Cornwall, but there have recently been indications that Charles and Camilla are living essentially separate lives, spending much of their time in separate houses in Gloucestershire and Wiltshire. More here(27.02.12).
Prince Harry looks very similar to James Hewitt. He has ginger hair like Hewitt and a similar physiognomy. Harry looks nothing like Prince Charles (younger picture here) or like his brother, Prince William (side-by-side pictures here and here).
Harry is also considerably less intelligent (academically) than his brother, William, (ask anyone who taught the boys at Eton College) and unlike William, he did not go to university. Harry’s father, James Hewitt, is also considerably less intelligent than Prince Charles. And, it might be noted, Harry has inherited playboy character-traits from Hewitt which are largely absent from William and Charles. But mutual friends say that Harry is more street-wise, in terms of modern popular culture and mores, than William.
The idea that Prince Harry of Wales might supplant his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II of England, upon her forced abdication has been around for a while. But the rumours were given new life at the end of 2011. Speaking on the record to a television interviewer, Harry expressed the view that he did not believe the Queen could carry out her public duties without the presence of her husband Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh.
A few days after the interview was recorded, Prince Philip suffered a “heart scare” and spent four days over Christmas 2011 at Addenbrookes Hospital (Cambridge) “having a blocked coronary artery cleared and a stent fitted.”
Observers noted that when he returned to the family house-party on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk, the Duke was unusually vigorous, physically. Seasoned conspiracy-watchers began to wonder whether the four days “in hospital” were, in fact, four days for the Tavistock-nexus to get a new Prince Philip clone up-and-running, the previous one having been terminated unexpectedly. More about the use of human clones in élite political management can be found here.
It should be noticed that although Harry Spencer-Hewitt (Prince Harry of Wales) is not a scion of the Nazi-continuum Windsor/Saxe-Coburg & Gotha bloodline, he is still, through his mother’s ancestry, an issue of an old, non-reptilian, English bloodline referred to as the Spencers. The Spencer dynasty began to develop in pre-Tudor times and became visible to official exoteric histories around the year 1486 with the rise of Sir John Spencer. More about the Spencer bloodline can be found here.
False attributions of birth are nothing new for the British Royal Family. In March 2012, an old story about the bloodline bona fides of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon broke surface with renewed energy. Bowes-Lyons was the Queen Consort (wife) of King George VI from 1936 to 1952. Thereafter she was known as Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother. She gave birth to the present Queen Elizabeth II, in London, in April 1926.
The official histories state that Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was the daughter of Claude Bowes-Lyon (the 14th Earl of Strathmore & Kinghorne) and Cecilia Cavendish-Bentinck (his wife). In fact, it now transpires that Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was the daughter of Claude Bowes-Lyon and their family’s French cook, Marguerite Rodiere. Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon’s full name was Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes-Lyon, and later, in court circles and further afield, she was often referred to by her nickname “Cookie”. More here (30.03.12).
Since 2012, there has been a fools’ procession of royal developments, disclosures and false alarms in Europe:
In April 2013, (Queen) Beatrix Armgard (Royal Dutch Shell), of the Netherlands royal bloodline, abdicated in good health at the age of 75. More here (30.04.13).
In May 2014, (Prince) Charles Windsor, in conversation with Marienne Ferguson in Canada, likened some Nazi actions in Europe to those of Russia’s Vladimir Putin in Crimea: “Putin is doing just about the same as Hitler.” Even by English royal standards, this was a particularly maladroit comment. The Russian President, Vladimir Putin, lost a brother in the Nazi siege of Leningrad during the Second World War. A royal spokeman said Charles’s remarks were “well-intentioned” and not meant to be made public. More here (21.05.14), here (21.05.14) and here (22.05.14).
Fourteen months later, in July 2015, pictures from the UK royal archives were leaked to the UK mainstream media showing the young (Queen) Elizabeth Windsor (Charles’s mother) practising Nazi salutes with her family, at Balmoral, in Scotland (see newspaper image above and further reference downpage).
In June 2014, (King) Juan Carlos Bourbon, of the Spanish royal bloodline, abdicated in good health at the age of 76. More here(18.06.14).
On Monday 8th December 2014, the UK’s 33-year-old (Prince) William Wales was in Washington DC for “a meeting” at the World Bank HQ. It is said that he signed a document there which authorised the disbursement of $48 trillion to a series of established global power centres. More here (30.12.14).
The World Bank sum of $48 trillion was very close to the $47 trillion sum involved in the Lien executed against the US Treasury and the US Federal Reserve on Sunday 6th December 2009, by China.
This World Court Writ of Execution and Lien was issued following the diversion of a $6.2 trillion loan from the UK Crown (London Crown Temple) to the US government to finance the (on-the-books) US Dollar Refunding Project. China had been involved, with London, in assembling these monies.
The $6.2T was wired to the US during the 2008 financial crisis on 10th-12th September 2008. The money was then stolen, mirrored, and traded for other purposes. More here (14.12.09).
(Prince) William Wales’ reported signing of the $48T World Bank document on the 8th December 2014, caused a flurry of speculation. If it was a Nazi-continuum Committee of 300 document (like this one, cited above), why did William sign it, rather than his grandmother, (Queen) Elizabeth Windsor?
Did this change in lead signatory mean that Elizabeth had resigned her position as Chairman of the Committee of 300, and had passed that post on to her grandson William (second in line of succession to the British Throne), rather than to her son, Charles (heir apparent and first in line of succession)?
If this, indeed, was the case, why had the official royal prerogative in this matter jumped a generation, leaving Charles and Camilla apparently impotent and discarded in the dustbin of English history? And, perhaps more significant, why was no official announcement of this royal promotion/demotion forthcoming from Buckingham Palace? Because it was not true? Or because it was nothing to do with the little people: the democratic electorate of UK citizens; subjects, still, of the Queen?
A week or two later in December 2014, the UK bookmaker Coral suspended betting on 89-year-old (Queen) Elizabeth Windsor announcing her abdication during her annual Christmas Day broadcast to the nation. An unusual rush of bets had been received. Buckingham Palace denied the rumour. More here (17.12.14).
In January 2015, UK royal Andrew Windsor (Duke of York) was accused in US court papers of consorting with ‘Jane Doe 3′ (Virginia Roberts) at an orgy where she was used as a sex slave. More here(04.01.15).
Also in January 2015, Spain’s Supreme Court agreed to examine a paternity suit against (former king) Juan Carlos Bourbon by a Belgian woman, Ingrid Jeanne Sartiau, who claimed to be his daughter. More here (14.01.15).
In March 2015, the UK Supreme Court ordered the publication of 27 secret letters sent by Charles Windsor (Prince of Wales) to UK government figures, including the Prime Minister Tony Blair, in 2004 and 2005. In these, Wales, an unelected aristocrat with no official constitutional rôle, sought to place improper pressure on government ministers. The letters revealed that Wales’ much-vaunted ‘political neutrality’ was a cynical establishment sham. More here (13.05.15).
In April 2015, an opinion poll published in the UK mainstream media indicated that 55% of respondents did not want Camilla Parker-Bowles (Charles Windsor’s partner) to become Queen (ever). More here(11.04.15).
In June 2015, the new Spanish King, Felipe Bourbon, issued a decree stripping his sister, (Princess) Cristina, of her title as Duchess of Palma. She was about to stand trial on two counts of being an accessory to tax fraud. More here (11.06.15).
Also in June 2015, a BBC reporter stated on an official Twitter feed that the UK’s (Queen) Elizabeth Windsor had died. She hadn’t. Shortly afterwards, a BBC spokesman explained that the mistake happened during a “technical rehearsal for an obituary” of the Queen. More here(03.06.15).
In July 2015, pictures from the UK royal archives were leaked to the mainstream media showing (Queen) Elizabeth Windsor, when six or seven years old, practising Nazi salutes with her family, at Balmoral in Scotland. More here (18.07.15).
A little later in July 2015, a Facebook page entitled: R.I.P. Prince Philip appeared. It stated:
“At about 11am ET on Monday (July 27, 2015), our beloved prince Prince Philip passed away. Prince Philip was born on June 10, 1921 in Mon Repos. He will be missed but not forgotten. Please show your sympathy and condolences by commenting on and liking this page.”
The page attracted nearly one million ‘likes’. On the following day, a royal spokesman stated that 94-year-old Philip Battenburg (Mountbatten), Elizabeth Windsor’s husband, was still alive. More here (30.07.15).