Corbyn Keeps his Promises to his Constituents, even if it means keeping the Queen Waiting*

Corbyn Keeps his Promises to his Constituents, even if it means keeping the Queen Waiting*

By Kerry-Anne Mendoza

Much of the mainstream media is having a fit of the conniptions today at news that Jeremy Corbyn turned down the invitation to the official joining ceremony to the Queen’s Privy Council. But as a well-known and proud republican – he’d have been a hypocrite to do anything else.

The Privy Council is a concept more in-step with Game of Thrones than modern Britain. The Council consists of 500 members hand-picked by the Queen, the great and the good of the Commonwealth. Members are normally inducted to the Council through a ceremony in which they kneel before the Queen and kiss her hand, but can be appointed without this ceremony with a simple order to the Council. Most high profile public figures opt for the pomp and circumstance. They kneel, kiss the Queen’s hand, and swear to defend her against ‘all foreign princes, persons, prelates, states or potentates’. They must also promise ‘not [to] know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done, or spoken against Her Majesty’s person, honour, crown, or dignity royal’.

In light of his republican views, Corbyn opted to skip the ceremony.

The Leader of the Opposition must join the council to access briefings from security services, and Labour have confirmed that Corbyn will join the Council.  However, he will not take part in the confirmation ritual whereby he kneels before the Queen and kisses her ring. Instead, he spent the day out and about, serving his constituents.

This lack of deference sent the conservative and (purportedly) liberal media into a tailspin of derision. But while the press screamed blue murder, thousands took to social media to subvert the label by expressing their support for Corbyn.

The most recent YouGov poll on the matter showed that while a majority of Britons do not feel sufficiently anti-monarchist to abolish the Royal Family, Cameron and fellow Conservatives would do well not to force the issue. While The Queen and William and Kate enjoy popular support, the public are united in their view that the monarchy needs to be slimmed down.

But whether you are a democrat or a monarchist, why would any sane person living in 21st century Britain actively defend prioritising patronage over public service? It appears that we have become so used to politicians saying one thing and doing another, that perhaps the most radical thing about Jeremy Corbyn, is that he keeps his promises. That’s sad for our past, but a note of hope for the future.

Source*

Related Topics:

Corbyn Turns PMQs into the People’s Question Time, and Cameron Flounders*

What can be made of this Royal Conundrum?*

Heavenly Signs: A Celestial-Terrestrial Drama in the Making

Between the State of the City of London and the Crown*

Why is the Legalization of Gay Marriage so Important to the Queen?*

Now the Queen Can Go Back to Ruling Britain and 15 Other Nations*

Advertisements