Archive | November 16, 2015

How France Loots its Former Colonies*

How France Loots its Former Colonies*

By Siji Jabbar

14 African countries only ever have access to 15% of their own money!”

Monetary bankruptcy
Just before France conceded to African demands for independence in the 1960s, it carefully organised its former colonies (CFA countries) in a system of “compulsory solidarity” which consisted of obliging the 14African states to put 65% of their foreign currency reserves into the French Treasury, plus another 20% for financial liabilities. This means these 14 African countries only ever have access to 15% of their own money! If they need more they have to borrow their own money from the French at commercial rates! And this has been the case since the 1960s.

Believe it or not it gets worse.

France has the first right to buy or reject any natural resources found in the land of the Francophone countries. So even if the African countries can get better prices elsewhere, they can’t sell to anybody until France says it doesn’t need the resources.

In the award of government contracts, French companies must be considered first; only after that can these countries look elsewhere. It doesn’t matter if the CFA countries can obtain better value for money elsewhere.

Presidents of CFA countries that have tried to leave the CFA zone have had political and financial pressure put on them by successive French presidents.

No escaping the CFA Zone
Thus, these African states are French taxpayers – taxed at a staggering rate – yet the citizens of these countries aren’t French and don’t have access to the public goods and services their money helps pay for.

CFA zones are solicited to provide private funding to French politicians during elections in France.

The above is a summary of an article we came across in the February issue of the New African (and from an interview given by Professor Mamadou Koulibaly, Speaker of the Ivorian National Assembly, Professor of Economics, and author of the book The Servitude of the Colonial Pact), and we hope they won’t mind us sharing it with you influx, so here goes:

The colonial pact
It is the Colonial Pact that set up the common currency for the Francophone countries, the CFA Franc, which demands that each of the 14 C.F.A member countries must deposit 65% (plus another 20% for financial liabilities, making the dizzying total of 85%) of their foreign exchange reserves in an “Operations Account” at the French Treasury in Paris.

The African nations therefore have only access to 15% of their own money for national development in any given year. If they are in need of extra money, as they always are, they have to borrow from their own 65% in the French Treasury at commercial rates. And that is not all: there is a cap on the credit extended to each member country equivalent to 20% of their public revenue in the preceding year. So if the countries need to borrow more than 20%, too bad; they cannot do it. Amazingly, the final say on the C.F.A arrangements belongs to the French Treasury, which invests the African countries’ money in its own name on the Paris Bourse (the stock exchange).

Ownership of natural resources

It is also the Colonial Pact that demands that France has the first right to buy or reject any natural resources found in the land of the Francophone countries. So even if the African countries could get better prices elsewhere, they cannot sell to anybody until France says it does not want to buy those natural resources.

“The contract must go to a French company, which incidentally has quoted an astronomical price”

Rwandan President Paul Kagame has condemned the deceptive part that France played in its ‘humanitarian’ missions during the 1994 genocide. Photo: Reuters

It is, again, the Colonial Pact that demands that in the award of government contracts in the African countries, French companies should be considered first; only after that can Africans look elsewhere. It doesn’t matter if Africans can obtain better value for money elsewhere, French companies come first, and most often get the contracts. Currently, there is the awkward case in Abidjan where, before the elections, former president Gbagbo’s government wanted to build a third major bridge to link the central business district (called Plateau) to the rest of the city, from which it is separated by a lagoon. By Colonial Pact tradition, the contract must go to a French company, which incidentally has quoted an astronomical price – to be paid in euros or U.S. dollars.

From Parliament to resources
Not happy, Gbagbo’s government sought a second quote from the Chinese, who offered to build the bridge at half the price quoted by the French company, and – wait for this – payment would be in cocoa beans, of which Cote d’Ivoire is the world’s largest producer. But, unsurprisingly, the French said “non, you can’t do that”.

Overall the Colonial Pact gives the French a dominant and privileged 
position over Francophone Africa, but in Côte d’Ivoire, the jewel of the former French possessions in Africa, the French are overly dominant. Outside parliament, almost all the major utilities – water, electricity, telephone, transport, ports and major banks – are run by French companies or French interests. The same story is found in commerce, construction, and agriculture.

In short, the Colonial Pact has created a legal mechanism under which
 France obtains a special place in the political and economic life of its former colonies.

The big questions

  • In what meaningful way can any of the 14 CFA countries be said to be independent?
  • If this isn’t illegal and an international crime, then what is?
  • What is it going to take for this state of indentured servitude to end?
  • How much have the CFA countries lost as a result of this 50-year (and counting) “agreement”? (Remember, they’ve had to borrow their own money from the French at commercial rates)
  • Do French people know they’re living off the wealth of African countries and have been doing so for over half a century? And if they know, do they give a damn?
  • When will France start paying back money they’ve sucked from these countries, not only directly from the interest on cash reserves and loans these countries have had to take out, but also on lost earnings from the natural resources the countries sold to France below market rates as well as the lost earnings resulting from awarding contracts to French companies when other contractors could have done things for less?
  • Does any such “agreement” exist between Britain and its former colonies, or did they really let go when they let go?


Related Topics:

France is Broke, but Still Reaping from the Colonial Tax!*

Controlling Haiti

The Rise of the French Right and the CFA Franc

From Liberation to Re-enslavement

Colonial France out for Niger’s Uranium*

French Grab for Mali’s Gold*

Mali, Al Qaeda & The Rothschilds

Oil Exploration in Congo’s Virunga Park Canceled*

The Spirit of Sankara Resurges in Burkina Faso*

The French Patent an African Indigenous Plant (anti-cancerous)*

France Leads Neocolonial Carve-up of Syria*

The Clintons Treat Haiti as Their Own Vassal State*

The Clintons Treat Haiti as Their Own Vassal State*

By Wayne Madsen

Within the last two centuries, there have been two world leaders who decided that entire nations should be their own personal property, the exploit at their will. The first was King Leopold II of Belgium who claimed personal ownership of the inappropriately named Congo Free State, a repressive colony of not Belgium but of its king, a notorious womanizer and patron of prostitutes.

The second example of a world leader claiming virtual ownership of an entire country is former U.S. president Bill Clinton. While Mr. Clinton shares old King Leopold’s penchant for ladies of the evening and mistresses, it is Clinton’s overreaching domination of Haiti that makes him a political doppelganger of Clinton.

Another Haitian first round presidential election, held on October 25, has served to be another exercise in rampant vote tabulation fraud. Dr. Maryse Narcisse, the candidate of former Haitian president Jean-Bertrand Aristide’s political party, Fanmi Lavalas, has claimed that recent election was based on massive fraud by the Haitian government.

In 2010, current president Michel Martelly claimed that his third place finish against the government-backed candidate in the first-round was the result of fraud. Martelly’s challenge was successful and he was moved up to second place finisher and in the final round he was elected president. In the most recent first round election, Martelly’s handpicked successor, Jovenal Moise, was said to have led with 32.8% of the vote, followed by Jude Celestin, backed by former president Rene Preval, with 25.2%. Third place finisher, Moise Jean-Charles, who is very popular in Haiti, was locked out of the final round.

Even though Mr. Clinton sent U.S. troops to Haiti in 1994 to restore the elected president Aristide, a Roman Catholic Marxist-oriented «liberation theology» priest who was overthrown in a September 1991 coup, Clinton’s 1994 military operation «Uphold Democracy» could be renamed «Operation Uphold the Clintons’ Wealth.» Clinton would soon double cross Aristide after it became clear that the Haitian president’s new party, Fanmi Lavalas, was heading toward the same left progressivism as Hugo Chavez’s Fifth Republic Movement, which was victorious in 1999. Clinton forced Haiti to undergo painful World Bank-imposed austerity measures, a virtual death knell for the hemisphere’s poorest country.

In 1996, Preval, to whom Clinton took an immediate liking because of his commitment to privatize Haiti’s state-owned enterprises, was elected president to succeed Aristide. Aristide supporters in parliament clashed with the Preval loyalists. In 1999, Preval dissolved the parliament and ruled by decree for the remaining year he had in office. Preval’s actions were supported by the phony «pro-democracy» Clinton who, in 1999, was busy trying to restore his political capital after his impeachment by the House of Representatives in the Monica Lewinsky scandal, backed Preval’s unconstitutional actions.

In 2000, Aristide ran again for president of Haiti. The U.S. State Department, under Clinton’s longtime consigliere Madeleine Albright, backed Haiti’s opposition in boycotting the presidential vote, which clearly showed that turnout was over 60% and that Aristide won with over 92% of the vote.

After Aristide was overthrown in a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency-inspired and planned coup in 2004, Clinton ecstatically danced on the political grave of Aristide, who was exiled first to the Central African Republic and then to South Africa. In 2009, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, who is owned and operated by the U.S. government, appointed Bill Clinton as the U.N Special Envoy to Haiti. Clinton ensured that the populist opposition loyal to Aristide, the man he helped regain office after the 1991 military coup, remain suppressed. Aristide was anathema to Clinton’s plans to squeeze every imaginable profit from Haiti.

Clinton was able to use the «peacekeeping» United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) as personal centurions to ensure that Clinton’s political and business cronies were not threatened by the populist forces of Aristide, who returned from exile to Haiti in 2011, and his Lavalas party. MINUSTAH forces targeted, and continue to target, Aristide forces in brutal attacks. Perhaps in keeping with the spirit of the sordid sexual deviancy history of the U.N. Special Envoy Clinton, MINUSTAH forces in Haiti were accused of various sexual crimes, including Uruguayan forces gang raping a Haitian teenage boy, a Nepalese soldier torturing to death a 16-year old Haitian boy, Pakistani officers raping a 14-year old mentally challenged Haitian boy, and Sri Lankan troops raping Haitian children. Neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton ever mentioned these outrageous actions while the U.S. president served as UN Special Envoy. Topping off these MINUSTAH crimes was the introduction of cholera into Haiti by Nepalese troops.

In 2008, the U.S. ambassador to Haiti Janet Sanderson warned against Aristide’s return to the country in a classified cable to the U.S. State Department. She emphasized that MINUSTAH was in Haiti to protect U.S. interests, which did not include a return of Aristide to the country: «A premature departure of MINUSTAH would leave the [Haitian] government…vulnerable to…resurgent populist and anti-market economy political forces—reversing gains of the last two years. MINUSTAH is an indispensable tool in realizing core USG [US government] policy interests in Haiti. Sanderson’s reference to «populist» and «anti-market economy political forces was a clear reference to Aristide and his party. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tried every trick in the book to prevent Aristide’s return to Haiti, including having President Obama apply pressure on South African president Jacob Zuma. These efforts failed. Aristide and his wife made a triumphant return to Haiti on March 18, 2011.

A year before Aristide’s return, in 2010, things got much worse for Haiti and Mr. Clinton was there to strangle the nation to an even greater degree. The 2010 earthquake decimated Haiti and killed some 300,000 people and left the country’s infrastructure in tatters. President Barack Obama, in a body blow to Haiti, Obama asked Clinton and former President George W. Bush, the president responsible for the 2004 coup against Aristide, to join Bill Clinton in Haiti relief efforts.

Mr. Clinton launched the following high-tech appeal on the web site of his William J. Clinton Foundation: “Text ‘HAITI’ to ‘20222’ and $10 will be given to the Clinton Foundation’s Haiti Relief Fund, charged to your cell phone bill.” Clinton also solicited for donations of up to $1000 for the Clinton Foundation’s Haiti Relief Fund. Most of the millions of dollars Clinton and Bush raised in Haiti relief never made their way to the Haitian people but into the pockets of the Clinton family and their cronies in Haiti and elsewhere. The Clinton aid money that did reach Haiti was siphoned off to benefit not only Haiti’s wealthy elite but also wealthy businessmen from the neighbouring Dominican Republic who were moving their operations into Haiti.

The CIA-linked U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and members of the Arkansas Rice Growers Association (ARGA), the latter political cronies of the Clintons, wreaked havoc on Haiti’s once thriving rice growing business. Once a net exporter of highly-nutritional rice, a combination of USAID policies and one-sided Clinton-era trade deals destroyed the Haitian rice industry and made the country dependent on expensive and non-nutritional genetically-engineered bleached white rice from Arkansas agri-businesses. In 2008, the soaring price of rice worldwide and price-fixing by U.S. agri-businesses linked to Clinton resulted in food riots breaking out in Haiti. By 2010, the time of the quake, Haiti was already an economic basket case.

Just like old King Leopold, who prized his personal country Congo because of its immense mineral wealth, particularly diamonds and gold, the Clintons became highly invested in Haiti’s emerging gold mining industry. The Clintons’ investments in Haiti, which had long been protected by MINUSTAH, would soon be guarded by an Israeli company, HLSI, the vice president of which, Eva Peled, a former officer in the Israel Defense Force, also happened to be the chief executive officer of Geomines and vice president of the Mitrelli Group.

In October 2015, HLSI signed an agreement with Haiti’s government to provide land, air, and sea border security for Haiti. The Geomines/Mitrelli team are major investors in Haitian gold mining operations. To ensure it gained full access into Haiti, the Mitrelli Group lavished generous donations on the Clinton Foundation. One of Geomines partners in the Haiti mining operations, VCS Mining of Delaware, named Hillary Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, to its advisory board in 2013. Rodham received generous stock options in VCS that stand to make him millions of dollars if VCS strikes gold. VCS Mining’s president, Angelo Viard, has also contributed generously to the Clinton Foundation, as well as to Democratic candidates, including his advisory board’s newest member’s sister, Hillary Clinton. VCS just happened to have been awarded two gold mining permits by the Martelly government, the first issued by Haiti in more than five decades.

Haiti’s new private «army», the Israeli firm HLSI, touts its capability to find land mines. However, the same thermal imaging technology can be used to find minerals like gold and diamonds. Hence, HLSI is concentrating its «security» efforts around Haiti’s gold mining operations.

Haiti is sensitive to the presence of Israelis in the country. Some of Haiti’s earliest slave owners were Jews, such as the Gradisse family of Cap-Haitien and Gonaives and Simon Isaac Henriquez Moron of Grand’ Anse, Haiti. Israel also secretly supplied weapons to the repressive dictatorships of «Papa Doc» Francois Duvalier and his son, «Baby Doc» Jean-Clause Duvalier. One of Haiti’s richest businessmen, Gilbert Bigio, a Syrian Jew who is also Israel’s honorary consul in Haiti, is more committed to helping Israel than his native Haiti. It was the Haitian elite, individuals like Bigio, who benefited from Bill Clinton’s earthquake relief money. 

Supplementing the HLSI security protection for Clinton/Israeli business investments in Haiti are the armed guards led by Martelly’s son, Olivier Martelly. These armed thugs, reminiscent of the dreaded Duvalier-era «Tonton Macoutes», are known as the «Galil Gang» because of the Israeli Galil guns they carry. In September 2015, Olivier was reportedly arrested by federal authorities in Miami on drug smuggling charges. However, the younger Martelly was said to have been quietly released after a flurry of phone calls were made that, according to Haitian opposition sources, may have involved Bill and Hillary Clinton and pressure to release the son of their Haitian ally.

King Leopold’s tormenting control of Congo was highlighted in a book titled, «King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa.» Whether they pray to God or invoke voodoo curses, many Haitians cannot wait until the ghosts of Bill Clinton and his wife join that of King Leopold.


Related Topics:

Haitians Are Rising Up Against the Stolen Elections*

Presidential ‘Hopeful’, H. Clinton Gold Digging on 100,000 Haitian Deaths*

Haiti and the Profoundly Silent Chelsea Clinton*

Clinton Receives Massive Funding from American-Jewish Oligarch*

France’s Debt to Haiti Remains Despite Hollande’s and Martelly’s Attempt to Rewrite History*

The Half a Billion Dollars Received by Red Cross for Haiti Relief didn’t Go to Haiti*

The First U.S. invasion of Haiti (1915) Remembered*

Haiti Puppet Government Failed to Silence Aristide’s Influence*

J.C. Duvalier: An Evil Cloud Over Haiti Comes to an End*

From Child Trafficking to Head of U.N. Ops. in Haiti

Rabbi Admits Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade*

You’re not a ‘Hitler’ if you Kill Ten Million Africans*

After Decades of Living in a Food Desert, Locals are Building a $2mn Co-op They Own*

After Decades of Living in a Food Desert, Locals are Building a $2mn Co-op They Own*

For nearly 20 years, the residents of this mostly African American Greensboro community had nowhere to shop for food. They tried to attract a big-box grocery store; when that didn’t work, they started their own.

By Liz Pleasant

Guilford County, North Carolina, has 24 food deserts—high-poverty neighbourhoods where at least one-third of the residents live a mile or more from a grocery store. Seventeen of those food deserts are in the city of Greensboro. According to a 2014 report from North Carolina’s Committee on Food Desert Zones, people living in these neighbourhoods are more likely to suffer from obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and more.

“The consequences of food deserts could be enormous for public health, the economy, national security and more,” the report said.

The neighbourhood of Northeast Greensboro is one of those food deserts. There, residents have been without a local grocery store for nearly 20 years.

Back in 1998, the neighbourhood’s grocery store, Winn-Dixie, closed. The store had been profitable, but because of the way the city was divided between Winn-Dixie and other grocery chains, the company closed its location on Phillips Avenue.

In the years after, residents of Northeast Greensboro asked the city to help bring a new full-service grocery store to their neighbourhood, without success. No company was interested in investing in a store that would service a relatively small area and turn a small profit.

Then in 2012, neighbourhood residents got together with members of the Fund for Democratic Communities (F4DC), a grassroots organization in Greensboro. Through these meetings, residents learned that they didn’t have to wait for a company to build a grocery store in their neighbourhood. They could do it themselves.

“I think the reason it struck a chord is because people organized for years to attract a corporate grocery store to the community and were rebuffed every time,” says James Lamar Gibson, who grew up in Greensboro and originally started working on the community-owned co-op project as a contractor with F4DC.

“When the spark was lit that we can do this for ourselves, that’s what resonated with a lot of the community members.”

Today, Gibson continues to work as a volunteer for the Renaissance Community Co-op, which is set to open in the neighborhood’s former Winn-Dixie building in May 2016.

John Jones, chairman of the co-op’s board of directors, is also a resident of the neighborhood. Once a supervisor for the 911 call center of Greensboro, Jones retired the same year the Winn-Dixie shut its doors. Today, he says, the nearest grocery store is two-and-half miles away from where he lives.

There are several corner stores nearby, says Jones, but many of them charge high prices for food, making grocery shopping expensive for residents who can’t make the two-mile trek to the closest supermarket.

“Those types of stores have a high impact on the neighbourhood,” explains Jones.

“A gallon of milk will cost you $5.” Jones looks forward to the day he and his neighbours can get the food their families need at reasonable prices.

“I own this store”

To raise money, the co-op first began selling memberships: For $100, residents became member-owners. As member-owners, they get co-op voting privileges, and can help shape RCC into the type of store they want. Today, the co-op has about 630 members. Their goal is to have 1,000 residents sign up by the time the store opens.

Jones says the idea of being an owner of the co-op has gotten a lot of residents really excited. He remembers one night during a meeting when a man stood up and said,

“We’re not only members, we are owners. I think we should be addressed as owners.”

After that, says Jones, organizers went through and changed their whole application form from membership to ownership.

“It went over like a blimp going over a football game,” says Jones.

“They were really excited about becoming an owner of a grocery store in their neighbourhood.” Now, the RCC T-shirts the co-op sells say “I own this store” on the back.

Of course, member-owner fees haven’t covered all the costs of the project. In total RCC needs to raise $2.1 million, and they’re about 95 percent of the way there. Thanks to things like grassroots fundraising, loans from foundations, and grants from the city, RCC needs to earn just $100,000 to reach their goal.

Another big help was Self-Help Venture Funds (SHVF). In January 2015, Self-Help bought the shopping centre where the old Winn-Dixie building is located from the city of Greensboro. Along with the abandoned grocery store, Self-Help is renovating the whole shopping centre. Once that’s done, SHVF plans to rent to RCC, a health care clinic, a pharmacy, and a credit union.

Kim Cameron, Self-Help’s director of real estate, says renting RCC and these other business is one way the organization can help Northeast Greensboro build up the services residents need in their neighbourhood.

“We have seen that commercial real estate development fit our goals of building economic self-sufficiency and stability in low- and moderate-income neighbourhoods,” reads the purchase offer letter SHVF submitted to the city back in 2013.

“Our strategy is to purchase vacant or underutilized properties, renovate those properties to make them attractive for modern uses, lease the resulting space primarily to small businesses and nonprofits, and then hold and manage the properties for the long term.”

By buying the building from the city and renting to RCC, Self-Help is able to offer the co-op a tenant improvement allowance. Unlike a traditional loan, Self-Help can lend RCC money for improvements to the building, which the co-op can then pay back throughout its lease.

A people’s grocery

With the initial fundraising almost complete, RCC is ready to take on the next steps of the project: getting the food and hiring employees.

“We’ve done canvassing surveys in the neighbourhood,” says Gibson.

“All the products in the store will reflect what people have told us they wanted.”

Now that RCC has identified the types of food residents want to see in the store, organizers are starting to reach out to distributors. He says the goal is to work with as many local companies and producers as possible—from the food they buy to the delivery companies to the refrigeration systems.

RCC will have all the options of a traditional grocery store, as well as some other services residents have expressed interest in.

“We will have an area for teaching people how to cook food for good health,” says Jones.

“And will have some organic foods in our store, but we will also have the foods that the people said that they wanted.”

RCC organizers have made sure to let the community know that this won’t look like a typical co-op in a higher-income neighbourhood. The neighbourhood is predominantly made up of low-income black families, so the food and the prices will reflect that.

The hiring, says Jones, will reflect that as well.

“We are hiring people from the neighbourhood,” he says.

“We’ll have 32 jobs. Fifteen will be permanent and 17 will be part time. And we’ll be paying $10 an hour.”

North Carolina’s minimum wage is $7.25 an hour.

As their dream becomes a reality, organizers hope the RCC and the community of northeast Greensboro are set to become an example of what it looks like when the goal of a business is to serve its community.


Related Topics:

The Food Deserts of America

Diet and the Sacrifice of Child Potential!

The Depletion of your Nutritional Food Content is Intentional*

New York Food Banks Running out of Food*

It is Now Legal in L.A. to Grow your Own Fruit and Veggies on City Land*

The Doctor Who Prescribes Fruit and Veg. Instead of Drugs*

Michigan Farmers Markets—Helping Families and Local Businesses through Food Stamps*

Black and Afro-Indigenous Farmers Will Share 2015 Food Sovereignty Prize*

Britain’s Hunger Crisis Sparks First Student-Led Food Bank*

Food Poverty in the U.K. Causing Soar in ‘Victorian’ Illnesses*

Criminalizing Healthy Food Paves Way for TPP*

Japan to Lift Duties Vegetables, Most Fishery Products under TPP*

Russia Tells the World about the NWO/CIA/MOSSAD/M16 Plan for Massacre in Paris*

Russia Tells the World about the NWO/CIA/MOSSAD/M16 Plan for Massacre in Paris*

By Objavljeno Nedjelja

A stunning new report issued today by the Ministry of Defense (MoD) to the policy makers of the Security Council (SC) states that yesterdays attacks in Paris can be likened to a “ritual massacre” and was “orchestrated/directed” by a secretive “element/cabal” of Freemasons (Masonic/Masons) holding high positions of power within the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the French General Directorate for External Security (DGSE), the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS/MI6), Israel’s Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) and the Vatican.

[Note: words/phrases appearing in quotes “” in this report are English approximations for Russian words having no exact language counterpart.

According to this report, the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) first alerted the MoD to the potential of this “Friday the 13th” plot a fortnight ago (27 October) after a highly secretive meeting was held in Washington D.C. attended by the Director of the CIA, John Brennan, DGSE Director Bernard Bajolet, former MI6 Chief John Sawers and former DMI Chief, and current Israeli National Security Advisor, Yaacov Amidror.

The overt purpose for this extraordinary meeting of the West’s top intelligence masterminds, this report continues, was their public discussion at an event called the CIA-GW Intelligence Conference: Panel on The Shared 21st Century International Mission where the future of the Middle East (at least from the Western perspective) was being determined.

The covert reason, however, for this meeting, this report says, was “revealed/discovered” by the GRU when these spy masterminds met in secret after their conference at the home of U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden, who is the top Roman Catholic Jesuit (Society of Jesus) holding power in America today, and presided over by CIA Director John Brennan who, like Vice President Biden, is a Jesuit-trained intelligence analyst with an interest in Just War theory.

Immediately after this 27 October meeting of these Western spy chiefs with Vice President Biden, this report states, the initial GRU report filed with the MoD about it “warned/strongly suggested” that the Jesuit-Masonic makeup of these “cabal/plotters” could not rule out a retaliatory strike against the Federation organized by this group on 13 November as these secretive organizations frequently, if not always, “schedule/plan” their false-flag massacres to coincide with “important/mystical” dates important to them.

Important to note is that unlike many of its other national counterparts, the Federation devotes an enormous amount of monetary and intellectual resources to what is called “esoteric/satanic/religious” intelligence due to their experiences in the Great Patriotic War (World War II) against the German Nazi Empire—a war fought not only against armies, but against the “unknown/unseen” forces behind that monstrous regime.

Especially alarming about the 27 October meeting of these spy chiefs in Washington D.C., this report continues, was DGSE Director Bernard Bajolet stating afterwards that the Federation protected nation of Syria “will be different from what had been established after World War II”—which in turn led the GRU to warn the MoD that the Freemasons “Master Magic numbers of 11 and 13” were now in play.

And exactly as the GRU had warned, yesterday, 13 November, the latest of the West’s “ritual massacres” intended to remake the entire world into their image occurred in Paris when Western-backed Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) terrorists led a coordinated attack against 6 defenseless targets killing at least 128 and wounding 180 more with 99 of the survivors being reported in critical condition.

The significance of these Freemason-Jesuit plotters exacting yesterday’s Friday the 13th massacre on Paris, this report explains, is due to their secretive organizations banishment, arresting and outlawing of all of their members on Friday the 13 October 1307 against their declaration of innocence, and the subsequent burning at the stake of their Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, outside of the Notre Dame Cathedral seven years later on Friday 13 March 1314.

Critical to note too, this report says, are that previous GRU warnings had been issued in 2013 that the Freemason-Jesuits would take revenge for the killing of their Grand Master after the election to the Roman Catholic Papacy of Pope Francis (the first Jesuit to be installed as Pope in the Church’s entire history) on 13 March of that year—699 years to the date after the fiery execution of Jacques de Molay in front of Notre Dame Cathedral, and in spite of the fact that Jesuits are bound by oath not to seek higher office in the Roman Catholic Church due to their past association with the Freemasons.

To the “identical/connection” between the Jesuits and Freemasons, this report further explains, was first documented by the United States Congress in 1913 [Congressional Record, House Bill 1523, Contested election case of Eugene C. Bonniwell, against Thos. S. Butler, February 15, 1913, pages 3215-3216] when the oaths taken by each of these secretive organizations were discovered to be nearly exactly the same in their members pledging their allegiance to their cause against any and all governments or nations:
Pledge of the Jesuits

I, ……….., now, in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed Michael the Archangel, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the holy Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul and all the saints and sacred hosts of heaven, and to you, my ghostly father, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola in the Pontificate of Paul the Third, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear, that his holiness the Pope is Christ’s Vice-regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing, given to his Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths and governments, all being illegal without his sacred confirmation and that they may safely be destroyed.

Pledge of the Freemasons (associated Freemason organizations and Rhode Scholars take this pledge too)
I, …………, now in the presence of Almighty God, the blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, and all the saints, sacred host of heaven, and to you, my Ghostly Father, the superior general of the Society of Jesus rounded by St. Ignatius Loyola, in the pontification of Paul the III and continued to the present, do by the womb at the Virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear that His Holiness the Pope, is Christ’s vice regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing given His Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, States, Commonwealths, and Governments and they may be safely destroyed. Therefore to the utmost of ray power I will defend this doctrine and His Holiness’s right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway and the now pretended authority and Churches of England and Scotland, and the branches of same now established in Ireland and on the Continent of America and elsewhere, and all adherents in regard that they may be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome.

Aside from the revenge factor being at play in yesterday’s Friday the 13th Paris massacre, this report continues, is it also being able to serve as the springboard for the Jesuit-Freemason’s ultimate goal of causing World War III.

To how this will be accomplished, this report says, and at least as these plotters hope it will, will be for France to declare yesterday’s Friday the 13th massacre as an act of war—which upon their doing so will bring into immediate force Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) treaty the French nation rejoined in 2009 after a 43 year absence.

Article 5 of the NATO treaty, this report explains, says that the response to an attack on any member may include armed force, but it does not mandate it. All that NATO actually promises is to take “such action as it deems necessary” to restore and maintain security. That could be anything from nuclear war to a stiff diplomatic protest.
The only time Article 5 of the NATO treaty has ever been invoked in its entire history, this report further states, was on 12 September 2001 after the attacks on the United States—which remains in effect to today, but with France at the time not being member would necessitate histories second invocation of it so that France can legally (at least in the eyes of the West) engage in total global war with its allies.

  2. NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)
    Established April 4, 1949
    Military Alliance

Article 5: Adopted a principle of collective security whereby an attack on one or more member states would be considered an attack on all and could be met with armed force

Purpose: To keep the Russians out, the Germans down and Americans in.

With French President Francois Hollande declaring today that this Friday the 13th massacre is, indeed, an “act of war” perpetrated by the Islamic State, MoD expert analysts in this report say, and with ISIS, likewise, claiming responsibility, the French have now vowed a “merciless response”setting the stage for a direct military confrontation with the Federation.

And even though the Foreign Ministry has warned against early conclusions regarding reasons and objectives the terrorists had in Paris; as all information should come from investigators, this report notes, the Western propaganda press has now gone into “high gear” pushing their citizens toward war.
As the Federation, since 30 September, has been bombing the Islamic State and its terrorist allies into oblivion, the greatest fear of these Jesuit-Freemason plotters, this report warns, is that their not so secret support of these barbarians with weapons and resources will become more apparent to the world unmasking these monsters and revealing who they really are—and with that what their global agenda is too.

But with doing as the Foreign Ministry says they should do, this report concludes, the true motives of this Friday the 13th massacre will, likewise, be revealed for what it truly is—and which President Obama himself agrees with as just the day prior to this attack, 12 October, he rightfully noted that the Islamic State was not getting stronger and has now been contained.
To the final outcome of this great tragedy this report doesn’t speculate upon—but one can hope that the real truth of this massacre becomes more widely known before, and as always, these warmongers plunge our world into total war.


Related Topics:

The French Government Staged the Recent Paris Attack*

Whoever Controls Eurasia Controls the World*

Captured Israeli Officer Details Israeli-ISIS Plan to Wipe-out all Islamic and Muslim Culture and Prevent Religions Coming Together*

The Occult and 10 Year Planning to Bring Down Syria!

Is There an Esoteric Agenda or Just an Agenda of the Elite!?

‘Jesuit Wars Pt. II’

Jesuit Pope Charged with Trafficking Orphans*

The Next President of the CERN Council is a Jesuit*

Has CERN Shut Down?*

U.K.’s Israeli Lobby gets a Seat on the House of Lords*

A Zionist to Head U.S.’s Economic Warfare Division*

A Communist as U.N’s Next Secretary General*

The Three World Wars of Albert Pike*

And One Ring to Bind Them All*

The French Government Staged the Recent Paris Attack*

The French Government Staged the Recent Paris Attack*

Totally proven beyond all doubt: the French government staged the attacks, rounded up the future “victims” after they left the Bataclan, murdered them while they were in custody, and then set up the bloody scene with the bodies.

A glitch in the Mexican media has proven that the French government murdered “victims” while in custody of the authorities. we definitely have a lot of dead people in these “terror attacks” and it looks like none died “in the name of Islam”.

Busted: the one Mexican girl (Nohemi Gonzalez) who died was confirmed alive after the Bataclan shooting when her family called her boyfriend’s phone after hearing about the shooting in the Mexican media. he said he was with her outside and they were both fine, and now, after the authorities took her into custody she is dead. busted busted busted, there were no terrorists, the French government did this job, and it is a filthy false flag.

I might get blasted off the web for reporting this, but it is a cold hard fact, it came across the television while I was going over the photos of the Bataclan. the dead body scene looked real, but was too low res to work with. Then this report came across the TV with the girl’s family on television, saying it like it happened from their perspective. They confirmed she was not shot after they heard about the shootings in the press. They got a hold of her boyfriend after the Bataclan was empty, who was with her alive and totally unhurt outside the theatre. now, after being taken into custody by authorities totally unhurt she has been confirmed dead and her family is wondering how, when they confirmed she was not hurt and all was well.


The fact that the French government murdered victims and then planted them back in the scenes afterwards explains completely why no real shooting ever turned up on amateur cell phone video from the Bataclan, yet there was a significant body count. They took this Mexican girl into custody, murdered her, brought her back into the Bataclan and dragged her to where they left her dead. This explains why blood is dragged all over the floor in the Bataclan, because they dragged and dropped the bodies after killing them.


Now let’s keep an eye on the distribution of deaths, to find out if the authorities ID’d people before killing them, to get deaths from as many countries as possible. If there are deaths from everywhere, that is exactly what they did – the French checked ID’s to decide who they would kill based upon where they were from, to get as many countries as possible to stand behind a war on Islam after losing one of their own . . . . .

After reporting this, I might as well pop in a movie and wait for a drone strike. And by the way, I am feeling well and not suicidal.

Anything to get their World War 3, ANYTHING. I am actually pissed off beyond belief, of all the gall! They needed a real body count so they murdered people who were PROVEN ALIVE after the “event!”

Ok, after working on this for a while, things are coming into view. Here is what likely happened: Agents, not “terrorists” got a small body count at the scene, and then spiced it with people they detained afterwards. That makes the most sense based on various reports, they did not kill all “in custody”, they spiced it with people they needed dead for the most political gain by murdering people who were selected for their nationality via their ID’s while in custody.

Among the dead, there is quite a list of countries so far.

We have:

Michael Jozic, from Belgium

Elif Dogam from Turkey

OTHER COUNTRIES NAMED, TO CUT TO THE CHASE: France, Sweden, Tunisia, Mexico, United States, Chile, Algeria, Portugal, Italy, Morocco, Spain, England, Germany, and the list is not done yet.

The Mexican victim’s family is questioning how on earth she is dead when she was alive after everything settled down, alive long enough after it all for the media to have reported it, and for them to try to call after hearing about it. this girl’s family was in Mexico, this news did not break in Mexico in five minutes. it took a lot longer than that, how on earth did this girl end up dead when she was fine when this hit the news in Mexico, long enough for her family to respond to the news of the attack at the Bataclan and call? This latest event might be what kills false flags, the French government is BUSTED WHOLESALE.

They released a photo of the bataclan, with dead bodies, blood, the whole 9 yards. But there are serious problems with it.

  1. No EMT response. If this setup was not wanted by the government, EMT’s would be all over it, dragging even known dead bodies to the hospital to be PROVEN DEAD.
  2. No police response. If this was a scene that was not set up by the government, police would be ALL OVER IT.
  3. Five people standing on the balcony, 1 photographer, and one guy on the ground floor. NOT A SINGLE ONE out with the bodies.

HERE IS A HUGE ONE: CONFIRMED: 4. The original picture in the highest resolution was released as a PNG screen capture. That exact photo is to the left here, totally un modified If you wanted to avoid all chances of anyone doing a real photo analysis to dig up evidence, a screen capture of a photo would do that job perfectly because a screen capture has so little to work with, it consists only of the bits it takes to display an image, there are no sub bits in a screen capture that can be pulled forward and analyzed. A REAL EVIDENCE PHOTO WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN RELEASED AS A .PNG SCREEN CAPTURE.

  1. The Bataclan theatre has many options for floor and seating arrangements, but in all past photos from before this “shooting”, they try to at least maintain the honor of the theater by not having an event done on bare concrete. Why is the concrete in this photo bare? OBVIOUSLY TO AVOID MESSING UP A PREMIUM FLOOR COVERING STAGING THIS SHOT.
  2. THIS PHOTO, WHICH IS THE ONLY PHOTO, IN ITS HIGHEST RESOLUTION IS STILL SUPER LOW RESOLUTION, WHICH WILL PREVENT PEOPLE FROM PICKING IT APART. It was not bad enough for them to release a screen capture, but even for a screen capture this is garbage. It looks “clear” until you try to do anything with it, like look for bullet holes in the theatre. The resolution of the photo is not adequate to reveal a single one, IF any exist at all.

And a few questions:

  1. Why is there no crowd reaction AT ALL?
  2. If the drummer got shot and fell down, as some are saying, why was he interviewed later with no gunshot wounds?


  1. There was no crowd reaction because the sound of the gunshots was dubbed in afterward. There were no gunshots at the concert, as proven by no crowd reaction, and NO, A SPEAKER CANNOT OUT PERFORM THE SOUND OF AN AK-47, NO MATTER HOW LOUD ONE IS, THEY JUST DO NOT GO THAT LOUD. So EVERYONE in the audience should have jumped out of their shoes if a real gun got fired. Let me explain this –

Many people have been out in the back country when people have been doing target practice. And the gunshots can be heard CLEARLY, miles away. Ok, if so, when have you heard any event and speakers like that, from miles away? I remember the stories of an Ozzie Osbourne concert that could be heard from miles away, but it took place in an open air stadium with 50,000 people and laws were written afterward saying a concert cannot be that loud, because many people got their hearing permanently damaged from that one event, that was legendary loud. This band was not in a large stadium and was not playing to 50,000 people, the gunshots should have been deafening and scared the crap out of everyone.

  1. The drummer, who was on TV later with no injuries whatsoever “fell down” most likely because it was just part of the normal stage act. His sticks did not go flying and instead got placed in the front of the drum set where they belonged. If there was really something going on, the drum sticks would have flown. The guitarist that exited to the left of the screen did so in a way that would be part of a normal act, performers do not stand still because that gets boring, they have to do a show. My conclusion: They needed to produce a fake video of this concert getting shot up “WHEN THE SHOOTING HAPPENED” because people were asking for it. So they went over whatever video of the concert there was, waited for a part of the show where they could say, yeah, this part of the show looks like people might believe something happened, and then they dubbed the gunshot audio in. But all aspects were not there, the lack of crowd reaction in any form at all proves this is not video of a real shooting.
  2. The shooters missed the band, and only killed members of the crew, BECAUSE THE BAND HAS TO DO MORE SHOWS IN THE FUTURE, AND NO FANS ANYWHERE KNOW ANYONE WHO IS PART OF THE CREW, those people can be vanished and no one will be the wiser. If a band member was actually shot, the show could not go on. Therefore that was not part of the script. More >>>

Related Topics:

Armed French National Caused Lockdown at Gatwick Airport*

Paris Attack a Perfect Pretext for NATO to Invade Syria and Iraq*

France Gagging the Opposition*

Israel Vents Fury with France after Vote to Recognise Palestine*

France is Broke, but Still Reaping from the Colonial Tax!*

Mass Migration as Weapons of War*

The Whys Behind the How of Officials Investigating Charlie Hebdo and Argentina Committed ‘Suicide’*

U.S. and NATO Launch Disinformation Terror War*

The Three World Wars of Albert Pike*

And One Ring to Bind Them All*

Trudeau, Canada’s Latest PM and the Military-Industrial Complex*

Trudeau, Canada’s Latest PM and the Military-Industrial Complex*

By Michael Welch, Richard Sanders

Why is Canada transferring Russian or Iraqi knock-offs of Russian machine guns with silencers to somewhere in Iraq from outside Iraq? It makes you wonder…Why weren’t they using Canadian-made automatic weapons? They’re using Russian-made ones! Is that so that the Russians are going to then be accused of putting these weapons in the hands of certain people?” -Richard Sanders (from this week’s interview)

Click to download the audio (MP3 format)

Less than a day after being elected to power, newly minted Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced to the U.S. President that he would be withdrawing from the war theatre against the militant group ISIL in Iraq and Syria. This move was consistent with an election promise, and in fact messaging he has relayed for over a year.

Trudeau had vowed instead to focus contributions to the international effort on “training of local forces (in Iraq), while providing more humanitarian support and immediately welcoming 25,000 Syrian refugees to Canada.”

During the recently concluded election campaign, Trudeau also pledged to cancel the purchase of the 65 Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter bombers his predecessor had committed to in principle. Instead the Liberal leader would commit to a process for replacement of existing CF-18s that was “open and transparent” and would “exclude requirements that do not reflect Canada’s interests, such as first-strike stealth capabilities.”

Harper for his part scorned the Liberal policy, mostly citing economic arguments and calling Trudeau’s stance “incomprehensible.”

Do these departures from the previous Harper government’s agenda represent a fundamental change in Canada’s foreign and military policies?

Not according to long-time anti-war activist and researcher Richard Sanders. Sanders has long believed that the Canadian government’s involvement in the international arms trade and fuelling of wars around the globe has been fairly consistent across party lines.

In a feature length interview for this week’s Global Research News Hour, Sanders takes a deeper look at Canada’s role in militarism and military profiteering. He discusses the contract to sell armoured vehicles to human rights scofflaw Saudi Arabia, and the recent discovery of Russian-made arms being shipped illegally by Canada to the Kurds. He addresses the parties’ disappointing commitment to maintaining or increasing military spending, even among the supposedly progressive NDP and Green parties. He talks about how the decade old election-financing law may have strengthened the influence of military companies like Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics in Ottawa. And he proposes a theory as to why the anti-war movements in Canada and around the world have proven to be such a dismal failure when it comes to confronting the increasing militarization of foreign policy.


Related Topics:

Canada: Now Bush Reappears on the Scene

What’s Canada Really Frightened of Banning Gatherings of More Than Three*

Resistance Mounts to Canada’s Secret Police Bill*

CIA’s Harper’s Canada is in a Crisis of Epic Proportions*

The Soft Coup: How Canada’s PM Harper was installed by the CIA*

Canada under Criminal Investigation for Murders, and Child Trafficking*

Canadians Reject Harper, but Hold the Cheers*

The Neo-Colonial Context of Canada’s Multiculturalism*

On Trial in Canada for Speaking against Zionist Crimes*

Canada: ISIS False Flag Served to Bring in Draconian Laws*

Canada and Israel Partners in Racial and Humanitarian Crimes*