Archive | November 24, 2015

Ban Ki-moon Wants Russia to Join America’s War on Humanity*

Ban Ki-moon Wants Russia to Join America’s War on Humanity*

By Stephen Lendman

Ban is a U.S.-appointed imperial tool, shaming the office he holds, serving wealth, power and privilege exclusively – complicit with US-led NATO and Israeli high crimes against peace.

He obeys orders from Washington, breaching his U.N. Charter pledge under Chapter XV, Article 100 “not (to) seek or receive instructions from any government or from any other authority external to the Organization.”

He’s a tool used at Washington’s discretion, serving its interests at the expense of world peace, stability and security.

He says one thing, means another. From the just concluded ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, he said ISIS must be “defeated in the name of humanity.”

“(W)e we need to unite. We need to show global solidarity to address the common enemy of ISIL, Daesh, some other extremists and terrorist groups.”

He urged Russia to cooperate with America in combating terrorism. He ignored U.S. support for ISIS, Al Qaeda and other terrorist elements it created and continues backing while pretending otherwise.

His call for US-Russian “unit(y)” and “solidarity” was code language for wanting Moscow to support Washington’s hegemonic objectives in the name of combating terrorism.

When sworn in as U.N. Secretary General in December 2006, Ban pledged to strengthen the UN’s three pillars: “peace, development and human rights,” to be a “harmonizer and bridge-builder.”

He promised to work for nuclear disarmament, advancing global health, sustainable development, education, saving lives, promoting democracy, supporting justice, championing human rights, and “creating a new dimension for the responsibility to protect.”

His deplorable record after nearly nine years in office is polar opposite his pledges – failure and betrayal of what he was sworn to uphold, consistently spurning core U.N. Charter provisions, notably “sav(ing) succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind…”

Throughout his tenure, U.S-led imperial wars raged in multiple theatres, still ongoing, escalating post-Paris attacks. Ban did nothing to condemn them or urge world unity opposition against destructive U.S. hegemonic aims. He continues supporting them through silence or duplicitous rhetoric.

Gideon Polya compiles “body count” data on “global avoidable mortality since 1950.”

His most recent post-9/11 estimate is “27 million Muslim avoidable deaths” – from violence and imposed deprivation.

“Avoidable death, avoidable mortality, excess death, excess mortality, premature death, untimely death, death that should not have happened is the difference between the observed deaths in a country, and the deaths expected for a peaceful, decently governed country,” he explains.

U.S. obsession for world dominance bears full responsibility for the vast majority of Muslim deaths and mass displacement since declaring ongoing war on Islam – for fostering post-9/11 Islamophobia, again after the Paris attacks, raging throughout Europe, America, Canada and elsewhere, against decent people harming no one.

Nonthreatening U.S. citizens Maher Khalil and Anas Ayyad were prevented from boarding a Southwest Airlines Chicago to Philadelphia flight – after being overheard speaking Arabic, both gentlemen humiliated in the process.

The flight was delayed. After questioning by airport security, they got permission to board. Other similar incidents occurred after the Paris attacks. Khalil told NBC News Chicago:

“We’re American citizens just like everybody else.”

He and Ayad were disgracefully treated like terrorist threats.

In New Territory, TX, Clayton Alexander Cansler was arrested after threatening to shoot up a mosque. He claimed wanting to do it for everyone he loves.

A passenger threatened to kill a Charlotte, NC cab driver for looking like a Muslim. Christian Ethiopian immigrant Samson Woldemichael said “(h)e told me he was going to shoot me right in the face or strangle me.”

He then repeatedly punched Woldemichael in the face.

An unidentified pregnant San Diego woman, wearing a traditional Muslim headscarf, was accosted with racial threats by a man following her.

Bullet holes were found in an Orlando, FL Muslim home, lodged in a dresser in the Elmasri family’s bedroom. An Omaha, NB mosque was vandalized – an Eiffel Tower image spray-painted on an exterior wall.

University of Connecticut student Mahmoud Hashem’s dorm room door was vandalized – the words “killed Paris” written under his name tag. Bullets were fired into an empty Meriden, CT mosque.

Post-Paris attacks, anti-Muslim incidents increased significantly in France, including assaulting women dressed in traditional head scarfs. Hateful graffiti proliferated.

France’s National Observatory of Islamophobia head Abdallah Zekri said incidents spiked dramatically in the first week after the incident. He expects continued ones ahead – an excuse for “ultranationalist (hate) groups” to target Muslims.

Five million French Muslims comprise Europe’s largest community, about 8% of the nation’s population – now living in fear of being attacked for praying to the wrong God.

Since November 13, Scotland police reported dozens of racially or religiously motivated hate crimes, including a mosque arson attack and numerous death threats. In London, an unidentified man pushed a Muslim woman in front of an approaching underground train. She survived the incident.

A Quebec man was arrested for releasing a video threatening to kill area Muslims. A Toronto Muslim woman picking up her children at school was assaulted by two men, told to “go back to her country” while trying to rip off her hijab. A Peterborough, Ontario mosque was set ablaze. No injuries were reported.

Council on American-Islamic Relations executive director Ahmed Rehab stresses: “The threshold for ‘see something, say something’ is meant to apply to suspicious behavior, not personal prejudices against minorities engaging in non-suspicious behavior.”

US-led war on Islam bears full responsibility for what’s happening – Islamophobia resulting from its rage for world dominance.

It bears repeating. Ban Ki-moon’s call for Moscow to support Washington’s hegemonic campaign in the name of combating terrorism effectively urges Putin to become part of its war on humanity while sacrificing Russia’s sovereign rights for America’s.

Source *

Related Topics:

U.N. Scam: Rotten Food, Expired Drugs for Syrian Refugees*

Egypt Votes for Israel at U.N. on ‘Peaceful Uses of Outer Space’*

U.N. Report on How Israel Coordinates with ISIS inside Syria*

From Child Trafficking to Head of U.N. Ops. in Haiti

Putin’s Address to the U.N. in 10 Quotes*

Russia Says No to One-World Government*

Moscow Doubles Down on Washington*

Washington Preventing Iraq from Turning to Moscow*

Hamas Asks Russia to Help Stop Israeli ‘Aggression’*

Captured Israeli Officer Details Israeli-ISIS Plan to Wipe-out all Islamic and Muslim Culture and Prevent Religions Coming Together*

Agenda 2030 Translator: How to Read the UN’s New Sustainable Development Goals*

NAM Summit: Ban Ki-Moon, the Spanner in the Works*

U.N. Plan to Make Legally Binding Climate Change Laws – Worldwide*

Russia Tells the World about the NWO/CIA/MOSSAD/M16 Plan for Massacre in Paris*

How the British Empire aka New World Order Sowed Seeds of Destruction towards Islam*

Whoever Controls Eurasia Controls the World*

Putin: Downing Of Russian Jet Over Syria Stab in the Back By Terrorist Accomplices*

Putin: Downing Of Russian Jet Over Syria Stab in the Back By Terrorist Accomplices*

Turkey backstabbed Russia by downing the Russian warplane and acted as accomplices of the terrorists, Russian President Vladimir Putin said.

This incident stands out against the usual fight against terrorism. Our troops are fighting heroically against terrorists, risking their lives. But the loss we suffered today came from a stab in the back delivered by accomplices of the terrorists,” Putin said.

Putin said the plane was hit by a Turkish warplane as it was traveling at an altitude of 6000 meters about a kilometre from the Turkish border. It was hit by an air-to-air missile launched by a Turkish F-16 jet. The crash site is four kilometres from the border. The plane posed no threat to Turkish national security, he stressed.

Putin said the plane was targeting terrorist targets in the Latakia province of Syria, many of whom came from Russia.

Russia has for a long time been aware of oil going from Syria under the control of terrorists to Turkey, Putin said. The money finances terrorist groups.

“IS has big money, hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars, from selling oil. In addition they are protected by the military of an entire nation. One can understand why they are acting so boldly and blatantly. Why they kill people in such atrocious ways. Why they commit terrorist acts across the world, including in the heart of Europe,” the Russian leader said.

The downing of the Russian warplane happened despite Russia signing an agreement with the U.S. to prevent such incidents in Syria, Putin stressed. Turkey claims to be part of the US-led coalition fighting against IS in Syria, he added.

The incident will have grave consequences for Russia’s relations with Turkey, Putin warned.

We have always treated Turkey as not only a close neighbour, but also as a friendly nation,” he said.

I don’t know who has an interest in what happened today, but we certainly don’t.”

endless-staircase by Peter BrookerThe fact that Turkey did not try to contact Russia in the wake of the incident and rushed to call a NATO meeting instead is worrisome, Putin said. It appears that Turkey want NATO to serve the interests of IS, he added.

Putin said Russia respects the regional interests of other nations, but warned the atrocity committed by Turkey would not go without an answer.

Putin was speaking at a meeting with King of Jordan Abdullah II in Sochi, who expressed his condolences to the Russian leader over the loss of a Russian pilot in Tuesday’s incident, as well as the deaths of Russians in the IS bombing of a passenger plane in Egypt.

The two leaders discussed the anti-terrorist effort in Syria and Iraq and the diplomatic effort to find a political solution to the Syrian conflict.

Earlier a Russian Su-24 bomber was shot down by Turkish fighter jets near the Turkish-Syrian border. Turkey claimed that the plane violated Turkish airspace and did not respond to warnings. Ankara said it was rightfully acting to defend its sovereignty.

Russia insists that the plane stayed in the Syrian airspace.

One of the two pilots of the downed Russian warplane was reported killed by a rebel group as he was parachuting down on the ground after ejecting from the plane. The fate of the second pilot remains unknown.


Russian Pilot of the Jet Turkey Shot down Rescued by Syrian and Russian Special Forces

A unit of the Syrian army special forces, in cooperation with the Russian special forces, carried out Tuesday night a special operation in which they penetrated 4.5 km deep into the terrorists’ lines and rescued one of the two pilots of the Russian jet downed yesterday by the Turkish army, a military source said on Wednesday.

The Russian Su-24 aircraft was downed over the Syrian territories yesterday by an air -to-air missile launched from a Turkish F-16 fighter jet when it was returning from an anti-terrorist mission in the northern countryside of Lattakia.

Members of the Syrian and Russian special forces who carried out the rescue operation returned to their position safely, added the source, stressing that the Russian pilot is in good health.


Related Topics:

Iceland Counters U.S. Military Claims of ‘Russian Flights’*

Russia, U.S. Sign Memorandum on Military Flights over Syria*

U.S. and NATO Launch Disinformation Terror War*

Russia Suspends Flights to Egypt*

Ukraine’s Kolomosky was Aiming at the Plane with Putin When he Hit MH-17

Former Iraqi PM Slams the 60 nations in the U.S. –Led ‘anti’ ISIS Coalition*

The Hypocrisy of Turkey and Saudi Arabia on Syria is Challenged*

Senior ISIL Commander Flees to Turkey*

U.S. Plan to Spread Cholera across Syria and Turkey May be Failing*

Netanyahu to ‘punish’ Syrians who Attacked ISIL-ISIS Terrorists*

U.S. Shows Footage of Russian Airstrike against ISIS as Its Own*

Australia Pre-Drugging Kids and Psychosis Risk Syndrome*

Australia Pre-Drugging Kids and Psychosis Risk Syndrome*

By Jan Eastgate

Imagine being a parent taking your 10-year-old daughter to the doctor where she gasps for air and suddenly dies in your arms. You are informed afterwards that a toxic dose of prescribed medication caused her death.

Imagine leaving your house to have lunch with friends, while your husband and 11-year-old daughter are happily cuddled together watching your daughter’s favourite TV show Animal Planet. You return home hours later, walk upstairs to her bedroom and find her hanging from the valence of her bed.

Imagine your teenage son is prescribed a medicine because a teacher said he needs it to curb his disruptive behaviour. Months later he is diagnosed with severe diabetes – a known but covered up side effect by the makers of the medicine. He dies shortly afterwards from complications.

These are not isolated incidents. They are representative of those thousands of children and adolescents who died while taking prescribed psychotropic (mind-altering) drugs in the United States. In the above cases, the drugs were prescribed to treat anxiety experienced while sitting for exams or for so-called “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder” (ADHD), the symptoms of which include fidgeting, losing your pencils, not sitting still, running about or excessively climbing, and butting into other’s conversations.

Australian Child Deaths

An estimated 1,900 Australians under the age of 19 have died while on antidepressants and antipsychotics. More than 30,700 under 18-year-olds were prescribed antidepressants in 2007-2008, including 550 aged 5 and under. Side effects include hallucinations, hostility, psychosis and suicide.

During the same period, more than 9,300 children under 18 – some as young as one – were prescribed antipsychotics, costing the government $3.4 million. Of the 477 deaths reported to the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) linked to antipsychotics, 15 were for ages 0 to 19, including intrauterine deaths. Experts estimate only 1 percent of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are reported to the TGA, so deaths could be as high as 1,500.

Common side effects of antipsychotics include excessive weight gain, life-threatening diabetes, and an irreversible neurological effect called Tardive Dyskinesia that manifests in uncontrollable twitching of the muscles and extremities and tongue movements. Another adverse effect, Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) can cause sudden death.1 Statistics the Citizens Commission on Human Rights obtained from the TGA in 2009 revealed 14 incidents of 10 to 19 year olds experiencing NMS were reported to it.

The psychiatric drug abuse of young Australians prompted one Western Australian MP recently to call for a national inquiry into the use of psychotropic drugs in children. To date, the federal government has yet to act.

Instead, it has potentially exacerbated the situation, handing over more than one hundred million taxpayer dollars to Patrick McGorry, Professor of Youth Mental Health at the University of Melbourne, Executive Director of ORYGEN Research Centre, and founder of the youth mental health centre chain, headspace.

Psychosis Risk Syndrome Creates Harm

McGorry’s Australian of the Year Award hardly had time to settle on the mantelpiece before the psychiatrist demanded millions more for his brand of youth services. Established in 2006 and funded by the Commonwealth Government of Australia, McGorry’s headspace, the National Youth Mental Health Foundation, are one-stop-shops that have a range of health professionals covering in addition to general health, mental health and counselling, education, employment and alcohol and other drug services.

It sounds reasonable. Some of the services are undoubtedly valuable. However, there is an ominous side. McGorry not only promotes youths being put on antipsychotics and antidepressants, he goes a giant step further: He promotes drugging them before they’ve even developed a “psychiatric” disorder.

It’s based on an invented disorder called “Psychosis Risk Syndrome” (PRS) – a subjective checklist of symptoms that psychiatrists claim to be predictors of early onset psychosis or schizophrenia, called prodormal (early symptoms). It’s speciously marketed as “preventive medicine” or “early intervention.” The upshot of it is that youths are drugged for mental disorders they don’t have.

The U.S. group Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AHRPP) likens this to “performing mastectomies on women who are at risk of – but do not have – breast cancer.”

As Richard Gosden, Ph.D., a highly respected Australian author and academic pointed out in 1999, “Apart from the risks involved in the prophylactic [protective] use of neuroleptic drugs, so-called preventive medicine might be variously seen as an unnecessary expansion of social control, a threat to human diversity through the enforcement of hyper-normality, a violation of human rights, and a marketing ploy for the new generation of atypical [new] neuroleptic drugs.”

PRS is proposed to be included the next edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). The American Psychiatric Association (APA) developed the DSM in 1952 and since then psychiatrists around the world have and continue to use it to obtain insurance reimbursement for treating patients. There are already 374 “disorders,” including, depression, ADHD, caffeine-related disorder, disorder of written expression, conduct disorder, mathematics disorder, nicotine use or withdrawal, sibling rivalry disorder and the all-encompassing “Phase of Life Problem.” Proposed new disorders include Internet addiction and compulsive shopping disorder. Psychiatrists refer to it as their “billing bible.”

The DSM is driven not by science, but instead caters to the pharmaceutical industry. Disorders are voted into existence, not discovered as in real medicine. Medical conditions can be substantiated with blood work, urine or other tests, x-rays and brain scans. There are no such tests for any psychiatric disorders. In fact, Andrew Witty the CEO of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) announced the company was dumping future antidepressant research as it was too hard to prove the drugs worked because “patient improvement is measured by subjective mood surveys” – based on DSM – “not by any blood or biological test” used to confirm medical diseases.

A study published in the April 2006 edition of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics determined that 56% of the psychiatrists who decided which “mental disorders” were included in the DSM-IV edition had undisclosed financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. One hundred percent of those sitting on DSM-IV panels overseeing so-called “mood disorders” (including “depression,” “bipolar”) and “schizophrenia/psychotic disorders” were financially involved with drug companies.8 For the DSM-V, a study found that 18 of the 20 members overseeing the revision of clinical guidelines for treating three “mental disorders” alone had financial ties to drug companies.

Dr. Irwin Savodnik, an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of California, Los Angeles, says:

“The very vocabulary of psychiatry is now defined at all levels by the pharmaceutical industry.”

Big Pharma & Australian Psychiatrists

The conflicts of interest between the APA and the pharmaceutical industry were the subject of a U.S. Senate Finance Committee investigation in 2009, an action the Australian Federal Government would do well to follow.

McGorry has received unrestricted research grant support from Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Bristol Myers Squibb,Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, and Novartis.11 He is a paid consultant for, and has received speaker’s fees from, most of these companies.

His research arm, ORYGEN, with its Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) and a “preventive” treatment clinic for young people called Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation (PACE), has received drug company funding from Janssen-Cilag, the maker of the antipsychotic drug Risperdal or risperidone.

EPPIC assumed a leadership role in Australia in the 1990s after winning the government tender to establish the Australian Clinical Guidelines for Early Psychosis (NEPP). These guidelines extend the definition of psychosis to include “the period described as the prodrome.” The list was originally adopted without comment from a publication called the Early Psychosis Training Pack – attributed to McGorry and another colleague, the principal authors being the Director and Assistant Director of EPPIC. However, a British public relations company, Gardiner-Caldwell Communications that specialised in pharmaceutical marketing, produced the document. The training pack was funded by an “educational grant” from Janssen-Cilag.

As Gosden stated: “This may have paid off handsomely for the company…. It may not be coincidental that a half page of the Clinical Guidelines is dedicated to dosage recommendations for using risperidone in first-episode psychosis. The Clinical Guidelines do not extend these dosage recommendations to include other schizophrenia drugs and the recommendations for risperidone give the appearance of an official endorsement of the drug.”

In 1996, McGorry and fellow pharmaceutical company-funded researcher Alison Yung set up the clinic in Australia to monitor young people considered at a “high risk” for developing psychosis and McGorry conducted a world-first trial on “early intervention” for this. A follow up study was conducted in 2002, funded with an unrestricted grant from Janssen-Cilag and supported by US psychiatric-pharmaceutical front groups National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) and the Stanley Foundation, as well as several Australian agencies. McGorry and colleagues found that Janssen’s risperidone reduced the risk of “transition to psychosis” in young people.

The subjective 16-item list of “Prodromal Symptoms and Signs” of psychosis includes: Suspiciousness; Depression; Anxiety; Tension; Irritability; Mood swings; Anger; Sleep disturbances, Appetite changes; Loss of energy or motivation; Memory or concentration difficulties; Perception that things around them have changed; Belief that thoughts have speeded up or slowed down; Deterioration in work or study; Withdrawal and loss of interest in socialising; Emerging unusual beliefs.

Summarising his paper “Pre-Psychotic Treatment for Schizophrenia: Preventive Medicine, Social Control, or Drug Marketing Strategy?” Gosden states:

“A preventive medicine campaign based on the type of prodromal symptoms and risk factors specified in the Australian Clinical Guidelines for Early Psychosis potentially defines the whole generation of young people as being at risk and in need of treatment.”

McGorry’s Brave New World

The entire concept of pre-drugging children sounds like a page out of Aldous Huxley’s 1932 novel, Brave New World. In it, Huxley depicts a “utopian” but totalitarian society, one that is insane and bent on control using the “technique of suggestion – through infant conditioning and, later, with the aid of drugs.”

Psychiatrists took this to heart in 1967 when a group of prominent psychiatrists and doctors met in Puerto Rico to discuss the plan for psychotropic drug use on “normal humans” in the year 2000. The report on that meeting stated that the “breadth of drug use may be trivial when we compare it to the possible numbers of chemical substances that will be available for the control of selective aspects of man’s life in the year 2000.”

Further: “Those of us who work in this field see a developing potential for nearly a total control of human emotional status, mental functioning, and will to act. These human phenomena can be started, stopped or eliminated by the use of various types of chemical substances. What we can produce with our science now will affect the entire society.”

An online opinion written earlier this year by Melissa Raven, psychiatric epidemiologist and policy analyst, adjunct lecturer in Public Health at Flinders University, South Australia, and David Webb, board member of the World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry, who works with the research/policy office of the Australia Federation of Disability Organisations, reflects this: “McGorry’s campaign is part of a wider push to promote the medicalisation of mental health (for which psychosocial wellbeing is a better term).”

“Further doubts must be raised about McGorry’s agenda when you see the substantial funding his organisation (Orygen Youth Health) receives from the pharmaceutical industry and also from the U.S. Stanley Foundation, which is notorious for its particularly aggressive approach to the detention and mandatory treatment of people labelled with psychiatric disorders,” they continue.

He has “personally received funding from many manufacturers of antipsychotics, frequently reports no conflicts of interest, particularly in his many recent Medical Journal of Australia articles, including a supplement on early intervention that repeatedly advocates the use of antipsychotics.”

Adding controversy to this is the fact that McGorry credits PRS to Dr. Ewen Cameron, the Canadian psychiatrist famous for performing cruel and brain-damaging drug and electroshock experiments on his patients in the 1950s and 1960s with funding from the CIA. (Cameron’s victims sued and on October 5, 1988, the CIA settled with the plaintiffs for $750,000.)

The fact that McGorry and colleagues recommend antipsychotics to treat PRS should be raising alarm bells – not further research dollars – with Australian authorities. Even psychiatrists point out the harm of PRS.

Allen Frances, professor emeritus, former chairman of the department of psychiatry at Duke University and chair of the DSM-IV Task Force, wrote an opinion on PRS published in Psychiatric Times and Psychology Today in March. He said PRS

stands out as the most ill-conceived and potentially harmful.” The syndrome fails badly on all three counts:

“1. It would misidentify many teenagers who are not really at risk for psychosis;

2. The treatment they would most often receive (atypical antipsychotic medication) has no proven efficacy; but,

3, It does have definite dangerous complications.”

Australian psychiatrist Niall McLaren says the diagnostic criteria for PRS “has no scientific validity whatsoever… it can never be reliable and… will have huge unforeseen consequences.” Essentially, it means “putting large numbers of teenagers and young adults under the long-term supervision and control of psychiatrists” and that “supervision” includes the “aggressive, indefinite prescription of antipsychotic drugs.” It is the “clearest example I know of pseudoscience. Not since [lobotomies] has psychiatry stumbled so far from the principle of Primum, non nocere. First, do no harm.”

Adds Frances:

“Drug company marketing would influence parents and clinicians to be especially alert to any strangeness in teenagers.”

False positives could be as high as 70%-90%. Moreover,

It has not yet been established that antipsychotic medications are effective in preventing psychotic episodes or in improving life course in those who would meet the criteria for ‘risk syndrome’.”

“Misidentified youths,” Frances wrote in another article, “would receive medications that can cause enormous weight gain, diabetes and shortened life expectancy.”

No one denies that people experience serious problems in life, that they can be mentally traumatised, even psychotic. But it violates the informed consent rights of all consumers when they are not informed that there is no science to diagnosing psychiatric disorders, that psychiatry’s diagnostic manual is more political than medical, and that even psychiatrists say is a “monster out of control.” Labelling someone with a mental disorder, even depression, can sometimes prevent their searching for non-invasive and workable medical solutions.

Allen Frances is, at least, candid in stating that the,

First draft of the next edition of DSM… is filled with suggestions that would multiply [psychiatrists’] mistakes and extend the reach of psychiatry dramatically into the ever-shrinking domain of normal…. The pharmaceutical industry would have a field day – despite a lack of solid evidence of any effective treatments for these newly proposed diagnoses” (PRS inclusive).

McGorry seems cautious about publicly endorsing the inclusion of PRS in DSM. In an online chat on Schizophrenia Research Forum in July 2009, he said caveats and warnings are needed if a more narrowly defined PRS is included in DSM, otherwise it could lead to “widespread over-treatment with medications which possess many harmful as well as beneficial effects.” It wouldn’t belong in a school or general population setting, he said, but “to those seeking help from an early intervention/early psychosis or youth mental health service.”

In other words – those in contact with McGorry’s headspace/youth mental health foundation, to which millions of dollars are now being funnelled without, it seems, anyone questioning his Brave New World of pre-drugging kids.

Source *

Related Topics:

NWO: Nonconformity and Freethinking Now Classified as Mental Illnesses*

Increased Reaction to Drugs Caused By Vaccines

For Trying to Protect his Children from Wi-Fi, Father is Given Psychotic Drugs*

More Teens Dying from Prescribed Drugs than Illegal Drugs*

Study Finds Antipsychotic Drugs Shrinks the Brain*

‘She went on to Prove Psychiatry Wrong and became a U.N. Advisor*

British Movie Theatres Just Banned the Lord’s Prayer*

British Movie Theatres Just Banned the Lord’s Prayer*

British movie theatres banned an advertisement featuring the Lord’s Prayer set to run before Christmas, saying it was too offensive.

Digital Cinema Media, a group that runs 80% of movie theater advertisements in Britain, said it will not run the 60-second ad because the company has a policy of not screening ads with political or religious messages in case they offend people.

The ad, which features people of different backgrounds praying as they go about their day, was scheduled to play before the Star Wars “The Force Awakens” movie. In the video, a man tends to his sheep, another places a bouquet of flowers on a headstone, and a policewoman goes about her job, each while reciting a line of the prayer. It’s part of, a campaign to encourage prayer across the United Kingdom.

“We are bewildered by the decision of the cinemas, Arun Arora, the communications director for the Church of England said in a prepared statement.

“The Lord’s Prayer is prayed by billions of people across the globe every day and in this country has been part of everyday life for centuries.”

British prime minister David Cameron called the ban “ridiculous.”

Tom Watson, deputy leader of the Labour Party, tweeted that members of Parliament recite the prayer at the start of each day.

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby said that it was shocking that an advertisement for prayer scheduled to be shown during the week before Christmas–the celebration of Christ’s birth–would be considered offensive.

“This advert is about as ‘offensive’ as a carol service or church service on Christmas Day,” Welby said.

”I think people need to watch the film and come to their own conclusions as to whether it is offensive or upsetting. Let the public judge for themselves rather than be censored or dictated to.”


Related Topics:

U.K. Free School to Close for Allowing God into the Curriculum*

U.K. Scientists Use Brain Stimulation to ‘Make You Stop Believing In God’*

UK Bishop Warns Of ‘A Slide Towards Ever Greater State Control’ as Pressure Mounts On Christians*

Rewriting Noah/Nuh: NWO Agenda while Deleting Religious Thinking*

Atheism and Rediscovering God*

Ukraine’s Kolomosky was Aiming at the Plane with Putin When he Hit MH-17

Ukraine’s Kolomosky was Aiming at the Plane with Putin When he Hit MH-17

From Alexandra Bruce

This clip is of a drunken Ukrainian Oligarch, Igor Kolomosky, who’s the Governor of Dnepropetrovsk State, being goaded into admitting that he was in charge of a rogue operation that attempted to hit “Plane Number One”, Russia’s equivalent of the U.S.’
Air Force One, to assassinate Russian President Vladimir Putin – but which, instead, “accidentally” ended up shooting down the commercial airliner MH-17, killing all 298 aboard, more than 200 of which were Dutch citizens.

Interviewer: And what about the Boeing?

Igor Kolomoysky: What do you mean?

Interviewer: Well, what was Poroshenko
thinking about?

Igor Kolomoysky: What? There is nothing
to wonder about. Apparently, it was an
accident. Nobody had any intent to take it

Interviewer: Well, I am sure it is the work
of your people.

Igor Kolomoysky: Oh, stop that! What are
you telling me? The shot was accidental – we
wanted to shoot down the Number One Plane
but hit another plane. It’s totally normal, not
that bad. Sorry about the Boeing, about the
people, however it’s a trifle. You know,
[unprintable]. When serious stuff [weapons]
gets into the hands of a novice, this kind of
[unprintable] rubbish is the result…So you
believe that we did that [unprintable]?
Intentionally, no, there was another [plane

This clip was was found on the blog of Dutch author, Joost Niemöller, who’s recently released the book, ‘MH-17: de Doofpotdeal’ translates to ‘MH-17: The Cover-Up Deal’, in which he takes the more “Russian” view of the events of that day than the official ruling put out by his own government last month, which was accompanied by an animation eerily reminiscent, in its intent to sell a story, to the one put out in 1996 by the CIA, to drive home
the spurious official explanation for the downing of TWA’s Flight 800.
The Dutch animation was also supposed to make up for the fact that the voice recordings from the (orange) “black boxes” were never publicly released because, according the Dutch Prime Minister, Mark Rutte last November, “The benefits of disclosing information about the MH-17 investigation were outweighed by the risk of damage to the Dutch state’s relations to other states and world bodies.”

In his attempt to avoid saying anything, PM Rutte sure said a lot!
Similarly, US State Department Deputy Spokesperson, Marie Harf speaks volumes with her intensely smug prevarications over why the U.S. would not release its own intelligence and satellite data to counter the “misinformational” Russian satellite photos of a Ukrainian Air Force fighter jet firing on the commercial airliner. The U.S has yet to back up its accusations with anything other than social media posts and what it mendaciously calls “common sense.”

U.S accusations, accompanied by spurious “evidence” about Russia’s role in the downing of Flight MH-17 are the foundation of its economic sanctions against Russia – and of the U.S’ strong-arming of NATO countries, to follow suit with those sanctions – at their own peril, as Europe formerly obtained most of its hydrocarbons (petroleum and gas) from Russia before these sanctions were put into place. They’ve since watched the euro tank, more than 25% against the U.S dollar. This and the War in Syria have precipitated a war against the dollar on the part of Russia and its trading partners, including China and Iran.

Then, we have those pesky rumours about a  Ukrainian Air Force pilot, Captain Vladislav Voloshin , who’s been identified by an alleged former employee at the Dnepropetrovsk Air Force Base as the pilot who mistakenly shot down the commercial airliner. The witness, being heralded in Russia as “Ukraine’s Snowden” has apparently passed a lie detector test.
If this Kolomoysky clip doesn’t clinch the deal, as far as getting the truth out, I don’t know what will. Actually, it’s more than likely that the truth will never become official, as the New York Federal Reserve Bank agreed to repatriate $5 billion worth of gold to the Netherlands government (the entirety of that nation’s holdings in the U.S), possibly in
exchange for their complicity with the US’

agenda-driven lies.

I guess that’s the price of 200 Dutch lives.
Related Topics:

Rebels Shot Down Malaysian Flight MH-17*

Victims of Malaysian Flight MH-17 in with Victims of Malaysia Flight MH370?

Russian Source: Saudi Intelligence Responsible for A321 Bombing Killing *