Archive | February 10, 2016

Federation of State Medical Boards Seeks to Eliminate Alternative Medicine*

Federation of State Medical Boards Seeks to Eliminate Alternative Medicine*

By Alliance for Natural Health

Is Your State Being Targeted by a Medical Monopoly?

It may be—if a secretive, private, and powerful organization called the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) gets its way. State-based Action Alerts!

For years now, we have been reporting on the machinations of the FSMB, especially their most recent efforts to pass their Interstate Medical Licensure Compact in as many states as possible.

Don’t be deceived. While this is supposedly a private federation of all seventy state and territorial medical and osteopathic boards, the real forces behind it are hidden—though our evidence suggests it’s the American Medical Association working together with Big Pharma.

As the 2016 legislative session gets underway, a number of states are considering bills that would enact the Interstate Compact. We’ve reposted our most recent article on the FSMB here to give you the full story behind this shadowy organization and its push to establish a medical monopoly. If you already know the story, hit this link to see if your state is considering a bill and take action.

New Power Grab by Federation of State Medical Boards Threatens Integrative Medicine

Back in September 2014, the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) released model legislation for the creation of an interstate medical licensing compact. The stated intent of the legislation is to streamline the licensing process for physicians who wish to apply for medical licenses in multiple states. According to Medscape, the model legislation would allow physicians to apply for an expedited license “in a state other than their own without filling out another formal application or providing another set of documents to the other state’s board. If they meet the eligibility requirements specified in the compact, the board in their ‘principal state’ of license can attest to their qualifications, and the second state can license them.”

The compact would take effect only after at least seven states approve the legislation. Once enacted, an Interstate Commission comprised of representatives of each member state would be created to administer the interstate medical licensing compact.

This may look like an innocuous or even useful move by FSMB, but a deeper analysis of this proposal reveals that the opposite is true.

The FSMB—a private trade association that sets standards which are often followed by state medical boards—has historically been no friend to integrative medicine. Despite having no public funding, transparency, or accountability, FSMB wields a tremendous amount of power over the practice of medicine in all fifty states. The organization has demonstrated its antipathy toward natural health since the mid-1990s, when it discussed altering the definition of health fraud to include alternative medical care! It would appear that FSMB considers innovative approaches to healthcare to be nothing more than exercises in “quackery.”

Operating in the dark as it does, it is hard to say who is running the organization or setting its agenda. But we suspect, based on the available evidence, that it is funded and controlled by some combination of the American Medical Association and Big Pharma. If so, it is one of the chief forces behind the kind of corrupt crony medicine we see today. At the very least, states should be wary of following the FSMB’s lead, much less ceding their power to an organization with so little transparency and public accountability.

FSMB claims its proposal “reflects the effort of the state medical boards to develop a dynamic, self-regulatory system of expedited state medical licensure over which the participating states maintain control through a coordinated legislative and administrative process,” and is therefore the “ultimate expression of state authority.” Such a claim, however, is frankly not credible—especially considering that the language of the compact clearly states that rules made by the Interstate Commission would have “the force and effect of statutory law in a member state.”

The Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts echoed these concerns, noting that

The Compact [takes] away the state’s autonomy and authority to grant licenses.…If [an] applicant is deemed “compact eligible” by any other compact state, all member states must grant licensure based on that eligibility. There is no discretion to look at moral character, malpractice history, training irregularities, or other requirements. There is also no opportunity for a state to disagree with another state’s interpretation of the compact requirements or their determination that a particular applicant meets those requirements.”

In other words, contrary to FSMB’s claim elsewhere, the interstate compact clearly takes power away from the states.

There is a stunning lack of accountability with the FSMB-created Interstate Commission. While we’ve been critical of the actions of some state medical boards, at least there is some degree of process by which the public can weigh in when rules are created. But when one bad rule can affect at least seven different states, how can the public have any input? Considering FSMB’s record of enmity toward integrative medicine, we should be extremely wary of its proposal.

Another worrisome aspect of FSMB’s interstate compact is its Maintenance of Certification (MOC) requirements. FSMB would require physicians seeking a license through the compact to participate in a credentialing process overseen by one of twenty-four approved medical specialty boards of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). While ABMS argues that its recertification process maintains high standards, many physicians see this as little more than a money-making endeavour for ABMS—in fact, the chair of ABMS makes $1,000 a day. Worse, these certifications are often used as a requirement for hospital employment. As with monopolistic nutrition licensure laws, FSMB’s interstate compact could be a similar attempt to exercise undue control over the practice of medicine.

As the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons notes, the compact “would be a giant leap towards entrenching MOC as mandatory for ALL physicians and [would put]in place a new bureaucracy that will most certainly only continue to increase its power over the ability of physicians to practice and the rights of patients to see the physician of their choice.”

In short, FSMB’s proposal is an underhanded attempt to increase its control over the practice of medicine—power that would likely be wielded against integrative doctors. Currently, fourteen states have introduced FSMB’s model legislation. We must vehemently oppose this legislation wherever it pops up.

You may be wondering if it’s even legal for a state to delegate authority to a private organization. It seems that the answer depends on the state. Some states are strict and permit delegation of authority only if the delegating statute provides definitive standards or procedures. Other states with looser standards find the delegation of legislative power okay if the recipient has adequate procedural safeguards.

Political philosopher John Locke argued centuries ago that no legislature can legitimately delegate its power of legislating to any other body. The founders of our country thought they were incorporating this principle in our Constitution. Alas, we have increasingly deviated from this basic English and American common-law principle.

State-based Action Alerts!

Check below to see if your state is considering, or has already passed, the FSMB’s Compact, and urge your legislators to oppose or repeal it. Please send your message immediately.

States where legislation is pending:

Alaska

Arizona

Colorado

Kansas

Maryland

Michigan

Mississippi

Nebraska

New Hampshire

Oklahoma

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

Vermont

Washington

States where the compact is enacted:

Alabama

Idaho

Illinois

Iowa

Minnesota

Montana

Nevada

South Dakota

Utah

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Source*

Related Topics:

AMA Threatens Outspoken Holistic Doctors*

Thirty Holistic Doctors/Practitioners Poisoned At Conference*

New Zealand’s ‘The Natural Health Supplementary Products Bill’ Bans Natural Products*

Western Medicine Is Rockefeller Medicine*

Murdered Holistic Doctors Discovered Autism/Cancer-Causing Enzyme Intentionally Being Added to All Vaccines*

Author of Mandatory Meningitis Vaccine Bill Caught Taking $420k From Big Pharma*

Deadline to Keep Homeopathy as a Health Choice*

Every Scientific Law We Have Today Will Be Have to Be Rewritten in the Next 50 Years*

Advertisements

Judge Losing Patience With Clinton Email Release Delays*

Judge Losing Patience With Clinton Email Release Delays*

By Tim Ryan

The State Department’s delay in releasing a cache of emails former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stored on a private server has put a federal judge “between a rock and a hard place,” the judge said Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras said he could order the agency to keep a Feb. 18 release deadline, leaving open the possibility of some sensitive emails finding their way into the public release. But pushing back the release deadline would reward the government for being slow to realize outside agencies would need to look over some of the emails on Clinton’s private email server, Contreras said. While Contreras did not decide at Tuesday’s status hearing which of the two unappealing options he would choose, he did demand State Department officials explain their slow release of the emails.

Contreras ordered the State Department to detail the process for reviewing documents by Wednesday, and tell him why those that have already gone through final review cannot be posted by the 18th.
 He also demanded explanation of why the State Department did not realize until recently some of the documents would need outside agency review.

He further suggested the State Department should be prepared to produce some documents ahead of the Feb. 18 deadline.

“The department should expect to produce something on the 18th, if not sooner,” Contreras said at Tuesday’s hearing.

Last month the agency asked for a one-month extension to release the remaining emails after it realized outside agencies would need to review some of the documents before they could go online for the public to comb through.
Vice News reporter Jason Leopold, the plaintiff in the suit against the State Department, told Contreras in January the delay would push back the release until after several states voted in Democratic primaries, leaving those voters without key pieces of information.
Leopold filed the suit last year and Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state has been a recurring theme in her suddenly competitive race against Sen. Bernie Sanders for the Democratic nomination in this year’s presidential election.
Tuesday’s hearing was set on the day of the New Hampshire primary, which Sanders is expected to win.
While agencies are returning emails to the State Department “daily,” Robert Prince, who represented the agency at Tuesday’s hearing said there are still 3,700 documents that need to be released, about 2,000 of which are still at other agencies.Prince went on to say 570 of the documents are past the State Department’s legal and final review process, and could be online as soon as Feb. 18.
Early in the hearing Contreras was prepared to ask the State Department to post the documents that were past the final review process by Friday, but Prince said this would be unrealistic. This delay seemed to confuse Contreras at Tuesday’s status hearing, as he repeatedly asked Prince to explain why documents that are past the department’s review process could take so long to put up for public review.

 “It’s not my system so I can’t say for sure but that seems like an unreasonably long time to post something that is already past the clearances” Contreras said.

When Contreras suggested Leopold simply be allowed to come to the State Department to review the documents on a computer screen, Prince said this would take even longer than preparing them for release on the agency’s website as they would need to provide a computer with limited access to the department’s system just for the reporter. Leopold’s attorney, Ryan James, who called into the hearing by phone, suggested his client would prefer the State Department be allowed to skip the Feb. 18 partial production if it meant they could release all the remaining emails by Feb. 22, a week ahead of the current deadline. But Contreras said the proposal was untenable, as some of the documents are with other agencies and their release is out of the State Department’s hands. In a separate case concerning Clinton’s use of a private email server, the State Department admitted Friday employees reviewing the documents had overlooked some emails that had been put in the agency’s archives.

Source*

Related Topics:

Assassination Hit list Revealed in Hillary Clinton’s Emails*

Cameron’s Mother and Aunt Protest against his Cruel Cuts to Children’s Services*

Cameron’s Mother and Aunt Protest against his Cruel Cuts to Children’s Services*

By Carlyn Harvey

Children’s services are suffering so badly under the Conservative government’s austerity agenda that even David Cameron’s own mother and auntie have publicly opposed the cuts.

According to the Mirror, the Prime Minister’s mother, Mary, has admitted that she signed a petition to save a raft of children’s centres in Oxfordshire under threat of closure. And now his aunt has said she will join in a protest over the closure. This latest familial embarrassment for Cameron hammers another nail in his leadership coffin, perfectly illustrating how unfit he is for purpose.

The petition supported by Mary Cameron calls for Oxfordshire County Council to reverse its current plan to close 44 children’s centres – all the centres in the county. It explains:

“Our Children’s Centres are a lifeline to new parents who rely on locally accessible advice and support at a time when it is most needed. Cutting these essential services would leave families vulnerable and isolated, and fail an entire generation of children.”

The council’s proposal to close the centres is a result of budget cuts, as the Conservative government have slashed council budgets by around 40%. The impact of such cuts is being felt around the country, and children’s services often bear the brunt of the shortfall. The Policy Exchange estimated that between 2010 – when the Tories first came into government – and 2013, 580 children’s centres closed due to local authority cuts. And the National Children’s Bureau has reported:

“Children and young people’s charities face public funding cuts of almost £405 million over the five years from 2011/12 to 2015/16”

Initially, these savings generally hit the poorest communities hardest, because cuts are not equal across all constituencies. As the Guardian reported in 2014, Liverpool city council, a city with high levels of deprivation, faced cuts of 27.1%. This was after the council had already cut its children’s centre budget by 70%. Hart district council, with very low levels of poverty, had cutbacks of only 1.5%.

That’s the way things work in Tory Britain. Austerity for the poor, and prosperity for the rich. However, it seems that Osborne’s relentless, out-of-control, austerity is now reaching more affluent communities. And Cameron’s mother doesn’t like it.

It is not the first time a Cameron has raised concerns about the impact of Conservative cuts. David Cameron himself wrote to his own council complaining that cuts were in danger of hitting frontline services. He then offered to “initiate a further dialogue” between Number 10 policy unit advisers and the council to help them with their financial affairs. This led to Cameron being accused of preferential treatment and investigated for breach of the ministerial code.

According to the BBC, at the same time, Cameron was lobbying his local police force to prevent the closure of stations. These closures were due to financial restraints and cost-cutting requirements. Speaking about Cameron’s efforts, Shadow cabinet minister Jon Ashworth commented:

“…I’m surprised that the prime minister is so out of touch with what the impact of these cuts would mean that he is now lobbying organisations in his own constituency against the very cuts he is implementing.”

To undertake such extensive cuts without understanding the impact they have constitutes severe incompetence on Cameron’s part. He is not fit to govern. Seemingly though, he is a better MP than PM. So perhaps he should head back to his constituency and focus on what he does best.

That would surely make his mother proud.

Source*

Related Topics:

U.K. Setting Children up for Failure*

U.K. Tories’ Budget Would Institute ‘two-child policy’*

U.K. Police Target Schoolchildren as Young as 4 with Tax Payer Funded, Transgender Propaganda*

U.K. to Put Fluoride in Milk for School Children*

U.K. Secretively Scraps Free Meal Grants for Poorest Primary School Children*

E.U. Refuses to give Cameron the 4-year Ban on E.U. Migrant Benefits*

No Confidence Vote in David Cameron Passes 170,000 Signatures*

War Crimes and the Rigged Scottish Referendum of David Cameron

Fracker Backs Down due to Protest, but Cameron will override this*

Corbyn Turns PMQs into the People’s Question Time, and Cameron Flounders*

U.K. Placing Justice Beyond Reach*

U.K.’s Israeli Lobby gets a Seat on the House of Lords*

Nearly Every Western Country has an Israel Lobby*

Nearly Every Western Country has an Israel Lobby*

By Philip Giraldi

In Britain, Jewish organizations uniquely are allowed to patrol heavily Jewish neighbourhoods in police-like uniforms while driving police type vehicles and there have been reports of their threatening Muslims who enter the areas

Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom recently suggested an inquiry into a surge in Israel’s reported extra-judicial killing of Palestinian demonstrators after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for a harsh response and told his police and soldiers that those opposed to the continued occupation of the West Bank were “terrorists.” Almost immediately, the Israeli government denounced Wallstrom as engaging in “political stupidity,” banning her from travel to Israel, while one newspaper close to the government suggested that she might be assassinated, as fellow Swede Count Folke Bernadotte was by Jewish militants in 1948, because anti-Semitism appears to be in the Swedish DNA.

All of that outrage and personal ridicule is pro forma for an Israeli government that reflexively smears and denigrates any and all critics, but the more interesting epilogue was the unanticipated discovery by the Swedish and international media that Wallstrom has not been paying the full rent on the subsidized government apartment that she occupies. The revelation follows a familiar pattern, where critics of Israel suddenly find themselves being discredited for something completely unrelated to the Middle East. President George H. W. Bush (the good Bush) suffered a similar come to Jesus moment in 1991 when he went on national television to denounce the pressure tactics of the Israel lobby. The Israeli government was demanding U.S. Treasury backed loans to construct illegal settlements. President Bush, who was running for re-election and far ahead in the opinion polls, suddenly was confronted by a well-funded and organized opposition raising doubts about him and his record. And President Bush was not re-elected, presumably learning along the way that one does not trifle with the Israel Lobby, to be replaced by the enthusiastically Zionist Bill Clinton.

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is also wondering about Israel’s alleged commitment to peace. On Tuesday he said

“it was human nature to react to occupation,”

following up with a comment on Wednesday regarding Israel’s “stifling” occupation of Palestine. Netanyahu reacted with his usual over the top rhetoric, stating that Ban “was encouraging terror.” One might also anticipate, as in the case of Wallstrom, a well-orchestrated media blitz questioning Ban’s motives or explaining how he has always been a closet anti-Semite. It is par for the course and fully expected when one criticizes Israel.

Indeed, it is a global phenomenon. Wherever one goes – Western Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United States – there is a well-organized and funded lobby ready, willing and able to go to war to protect Israel. Most of the organizations involved take at least some direction from officials in Tel Aviv. Many of them even cooperate fully with the Israeli government, its para-statal organizations and faux-NGOs like the lawfare centre Shurat HaDin. Their goal is to spread propaganda and influence the public in their respective countries of residence to either hew to the line coming out of Tel Aviv or to confuse the narrative and stifle debate when potential Israeli crimes are being discussed.

Israel’s diaspora allies are backed up by a formidable government organized machine that spews out disinformation and muddies the waters whenever critics surface. The Israeli Foreign Ministry has a corps of paid “volunteers” who monitor websites worldwide and take remedial action and there is a similar group working out of the Prime Minister’s office. That is why any negative story appearing in the U.S. about Israel is immediately inundated with pro-Israel comments, many of which make exactly the same coordinated points while exhibiting the same somewhat less than perfect English. On sites like Yahoo they are actually able to suppress unwelcome comments by flooding the site with “Dislike” responses. If a comment receives a large number of dislikes, it is automatically blocked or removed.

The sayanim, local Jews in their countries of residence, are essential to this process, having been alerted by emails from the Israeli Foreign Ministry about what to do and say. The reality is that Israel has lost the war of public opinion based on its own actions, which are becoming more and more repressive and even inhumane and so are difficult to explain. That means that the narrative has to be shifted by Israel’s friends through subterfuge and the corruption of the information process in each country. In some places the key media and political players who are engaged in the process can simply be bought. In other places they can be intimidated or pressured into taking positions that are neither in their own countries’ interests nor morally acceptable. In large countries like the United States, Britain and France a combination of friendly suasion and coercive elements often come together.

In all cases, the objective is the same: to repress or misrepresent any criticism of Israel and to block any initiatives that might be taken that would do damage either to the Israeli economy or to the country’s perceived standing in the world. In some countries Israel’s advocates work right out in the open and are highly successful in implementing policies that often remain largely hidden but that can be discerned as long as one knows what to look for.

Recent Israel Lobby activity in the United States has included legislation at state levels to make illegal divestment from Israel or to promote boycott of Israeli products. A trade pact with Europe will reportedly include language requiring the United States to take retaliatory action if any European country tries to boycott Israel, to include the West Bank settlements, which the empowering legislation regards as part of Israel proper.

Israel is also working to create a mechanism for global censorship of the internet to ban “incitement,” which clearly is a euphemism for material that is critical of its policies. Recently Facebook has begun to delete from its site any “hate speech” and “terrorism” related material but what has not been widely noted is that the apparent restrictions also have involved sites critical of Israel including Christians United for Peace.

Many prominent critics of the American Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC) are unaware that AIPAC exists in various forms in a number of other countries. BICOM , the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre, is located in London. The French equivalent is the Conseil Representatif des Institutions Juives de France (CRIF). In Canada there is a Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) , in Australia a Zionist Federation of Australia and in New Zealand a Zionist Federation of New Zealand .

While AIPAC is specifically focused on the U.S.-Israel relationship, its counterparts in Europe often deal with a whole range of issues that they define as Jewish, but protecting Israel is always part of their agenda, particularly for those groups that label themselves as Zionist. The political power and financial muscle of the groups gives them access to government far beyond the actual numbers of their supporters. In France this has led to the legislation of hate crimes that de facto exist to protect Jews that have been also been interpreted as limitations on one’s ability to criticize Israel. In its most recent test, a French court declared that a peaceful protest promoting Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) directed against Israel was illegal.

Many believe that France now has less free speech than any other European country. Recently, the alleged humour magazine Charlie Hebdo, ran a revolting cartoon showing the little Syrian boy Alan Kurdi who drowned in Turkey last summer as all grown up and sexually assaulting a woman in Germany. There was considerable outrage throughout the world but no sign that the French government will do anything to prosecute the magazines since it was Muslims who were being ridiculed. Charlie Hebdo frequently insults Muslims (and also Christians) but rarely lampoons Jews.

In Britain, Jewish organizations uniquely are allowed to patrol heavily Jewish neighbourhoods in police-like uniforms while driving police type vehicles and there have been reports of their threatening Muslims who enter the areas. Prime Minister David Cameron’s government, which is responsive to a Conservative Friends of Israel lobbying group, has also done its part to create official barriers to any spread of the BDS movement. It is proposing legislation that will enable it to overrule decisions by local government councils that seek to cut business or investment ties with Israel and, more particularly, Israeli settlements, under the pretext that such action interferes with the conduct of foreign affairs. The British government is also considering its own brand of hate speech legislation, banning from social media any commentary that is considered to be anti-Semitic, which will almost certainly extend to criticism of Israel.

Canada’s government has also threatened to use hate speech laws to block criticism of Israel and forbid BDS related activity. Australia meanwhile, has ceased referring to east Jerusalem as “occupied” and is apparently leaning towards similar “non-pejorative” language relating to the militarized occupation of the West Bank, preferring the neocon favoured dodge “disputed.” New Zealand has proposed Israeli-Palestinian peace talks that specifically demands that participants “refrain from referring a situation…to the International Criminal Court,” which would effectively decriminalize war crimes committed by both sides during the two recent invasions of Gaza. As a United Nations investigation determined that Israel was disproportionately responsible for what did occur, the proposal eliminates accountability and is effectively a get out of jail free card for some Israeli government officials.

And so it goes. Criticize Israel and there will be a comeuppance by virtue of a highly developed international system that relies on government direction as well as volunteer supporters who are able to shape both the media message and the political response. Accepting that as a given, I suppose one should be proud of being called an anti-Semite every time the label is misapplied to stifle dissent, but it all sadly reflects a lowering of the discussion to a dirt level. This might just be because there is no justification for Israeli behaviour. The fact is that in terms of systematic human rights violations Israel is something beyond an apartheid state, frequently engaging in open racism and, in the opinion of many observers, crimes against humanity. It is furthermore a persistent source of instability in the Middle East and even beyond.

Israel is a liability to the United States and to the European nations that it has successfully manipulated into acquiescence regarding its bad behaviour. When AIPAC and its overseas clones act for Israel the host nations in which these organizations exist should recognize exactly what is taking place. If Israel is truly first in their hearts and minds that is perfectly acceptable but its advocates should perhaps consider moving there and letting the rest of us be. Would that be too much to ask?

Source*

Related Topics:

Letter to Karl Marx from Baruch Levy 1928*

France’s Zionist Prime Minister, Manuel Valls*

On Trial in Canada for Speaking against Zionist Crimes*

“We, the elders of Zion, pull the strings of Congress”

Jewish NY High School Student Facing Legal Action for Supporting Palestine*

Plugging into U.K. Jewish Networks as the Key to Success for the Ambitious *

Zionist Influence in U.K. Politics Comes to the Surface, Again*

The Khazars and Zionists are One: The Re-invasion of the Ukraine*

Greek Bishop Refers to the Nature of international Jewry’s Subversive, anti-Christian, anti-White, pro-Gay Agenda*

The Talmudic Roots of Jewish Supremacism*

Zionism and Organized Islamophobia – The Facts*

Cultural Marxism and Satanism*

Western Governments Are Enslaving Humanity through Vaccines*

Western Governments Are Enslaving Humanity through Vaccines*

When your children are barely human, psychologically-altered bots, their nerve cells and synapses failing to connect, and their neuro-developmental processes dulled to the point of restricting them to sub-human level repetitive grunts and gormless stares, what are you going to do then?

By Baxter Dmitry

An insider from the Ministry of Health in Russia has revealed that an explosive report is being prepared that will be presented to the Kremlin on Tuesday regarding the huge vaccination cover-up being perpetuated by the U.S. government agencies and its regulatory bodies, which is having disastrous consequences around most of the world.

It is understood President Putin personally requested the report. He instinctively mistrusts the vaccine agenda and wants the report to investigate the state of play regarding vaccines, Big Pharma, and Western governments, in order to formulate a solid, direct response that will stand his people in good stead for the future.

According to the Ministry of Health insider, the report validates President Putin’s suspicions. There is a huge conflict of interests between the government agencies which regulate vaccines and the corporations that approve and implement the vaccines.

This investigation, involving internationally respected scientists and leading medical professionals, won’t be a laughably corrupt affair involving a payroll of ‘scientists’ who are willing to say or do anything for a dollar or two. Considering the fact that leading scientists and doctors who have dared voice concern about state-enforced vaccinations have been dying under mysterious circumstances in the US in recent years, kudos must be given to those brave enough to continue speaking out.

It is claimed the report will declare the situation a ‘self-perpetuating criminal racket.’ Educational institutions and scientific bodies are also ‘motivated by greed and generally corrupt.’ A recent study by the University of Bristol that declared diet soda to be healthier than water (a study covertly funded by the Coca Cola Company) is presented as an example of the absurd situation in the West at the moment, and is held up to ridicule.

BUT IT GETS EVEN WORSE.

According to the report, Western governments are working hand in hand with corporations, using money hungry scientists and educational bodies as tools, to pull the wool over the eyes of the largely complacent, unsuspecting public. But the public aren’t just being conned, they are slowly but surely being enslaved. This is the master plan.

You must fight this. Because once you are enslaved, you can’t just realise you don’t like it anymore and decide to free yourself. This kind of enslavement is a state of being. It’s what you are on a cellular level. When your children are barely human, psychologically-altered bots, their nerve cells and synapses failing to connect, and their neuro-developmental processes dulled to the point of restricting them to sub-human level repetitive grunts and gormless stares, what are you going to do then? The elite have won. You and your descendants are now officially slave class, no better than battery chickens, and will be used for whatever purpose the elite deem suitable for you. This is a prison you can’t escape from.

We must fight this.

Source*

Related Topics:

Waking Up to Vaccine Discrimination*

Courts Confirm MMR Vaccine Causes Autism*

New Federal Bill Lowers Standards on Poor Standards for Experimental Vaccine Licensing*

Who was Paid what for your Vaccine Rights*

Universal Vaccinations for Children will be Overseen by Committee which Accepts Vaccine Manufacturer Monies*

Documents from U.K. reveal 30 Years of Vaccine Cover-up*

WHO Admitted Smallpox Vaccine Caused AIDS after Requesting It*

U.N. Vaccine Program has Deliberately Killed Syrian Kids*

Author of Mandatory Meningitis Vaccine Bill Caught Taking $420k From Big Pharma*

The Gates Foundation and their Fraudulent Vaccine Empire is Under Fire*

The WHO’s Private Vaccine Laboratory*

Infant of Pro- Vaccine Parent Dies Following 5 Doses of Vaccine*

Polio Vaccine Spreads Polio-like Disease*

Five Year Old Girl Died from the MMR Vaccine Required for Kindergarten*

U.S. Citizens March on CDC Headquarters to Protest Vaccine Corruption*

After 32 Vaccine Shots Boy Diagnosed with Autism*

Mother Pulls Children Out of School After it Introduced ‘Transgender Awareness Program’*

Mother Pulls Children Out of School After it Introduced ‘Transgender Awareness Program’*

By Cindy Tran

A mother has reportedly pulled her children out of a school over claims a program that promotes transgender awareness is ‘brainwashing’ students within the institution.

Mother Cella White said her 14-year-old son was told in science class that he could wear a dress to Frankston High School, about 40 kilometres south of Melbourne, and call transgender students by their preferred pronoun, the Herald Sun reported.

The government-funded program – run by the Safe Schools Coalition since 2010 – is designed to create safe and inclusive school environments for same-sex attracted, intersex and gender diverse students.

‘This isn’t about safe schools, it’s transgenderism and gay activism bought into the classroom,’ Ms White told the publication.

The mother of four said the school’s policy could see children sharing a bathroom with gender-diverse students.

‘It could be a year 12 student of the opposite-born sex in the bathroom with my year 7 daughter who is blind,’ Ms White said.

She also claimed that she was not the only parent who was unhappy with the school’s policy.

Ms White said she wanted to warn other parents of ‘what their children are being taught’.

‘It’s being presented as an anti-bullying program but the education department said it’s a sexual diversity program,’ she said.

Frankston High School , about 40 kilometres south of Melbourne

A spokesperson for Minister for Education James Merlino told Daily Mail Australia the program was designed to promote inclusion, safety and understanding within the school grounds.

‘Claims that the program is about brainwashing or indoctrination are just wrong,’ the spokesperson said.

‘Discrimination, harassment and bullying have no place in Victorian schools, and it is up to all of us to establish safe and inclusive learning environments for every one of our students.

‘We are proud of the work the Safe Schools Coalition is doing to make all Victorian students feel supported.

‘Labour made an election commitment to bring this important program to every Victorian government school and we are happy to honour that promise.’

Director Safe Schools Coalition Australia Sally Richardson told Daily Mail Australia the program ‘works to actively support schools, across all education sectors’.

‘[And] to build respectful relationships, celebrate diversity and support individual choices for the wellbeing of all young people.

‘We provide schools with practical ways to foster a positive school culture where students, staff and families of all gender identities feel safe, included and valued.

‘To date close to 500 schools have joined the program nationally and we look forward to seeing this number grow as we continue our work in 2016.’

Daily Mail Australia has contacted Cella White for further comment.

Source*

Related Topics:

Sexual Liberation a Tool of Mass Control*

Gays Who Reject the Illuminati Agenda*

British Children as Young as 3 Referred for Transgender Treatment*

U.K. Police Target Schoolchildren as Young as 4 with Tax Payer Funded, Transgender Propaganda*

Raised by Transgendered Parent, but against Transgendered Adoption*

European Parliament asks WHO to remove transgender from Manual of Disorders*

U.K. Offers Fast-track for Transgender Teachers and a £30,000 Grant*

Parents Thwart Transgender Bathroom Ruling in New York School District*

American College of Paediatricians Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage was a ‘A Tragic Day for America’s Children’*

Surprise – STD Rates among U.S. Homosexuals ‘alarming,’*

Obama Spent $700 Million Promoting Homosexuality Overseas*

Obama Threatens to Pull Funding from Schools that Disallow Boys Use of Girl’s Bathrooms*