Archive | February 16, 2016

CDC Adds 3 More Vaccines to Childhood Immunization Schedule*

CDC Adds 3 More Vaccines to Childhood Immunization Schedule*

Up, up and away!

This pretty much describes the CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule since 1950.

On February 1, 2016, the insanity continued as the CDC hiked the childhood immunization schedule even further by adding another 3 vaccinations and lowering the age for the first HPV jab (Gardasil) to 9 years old. The total is now an outrageous 74 doses (53 injections) by age 17, an increase of 24X since 1950.

Have our children become pin cushions of profit for the drug companies? Here’s the breakdown. You decide.

  • In 1950, there were 3 childhood vaccines typically given when a child entered school.
  • In 1983, there were 10 recommended vaccines by the age of 6 years old (24 doses, 7 injections, 4 oral doses for polio).
  • In 2010, the CDC vax schedule totaled 68 doses with more than half given by the time a child was only a year and a half old.
  • In 2016, the schedule has increased to 74 doses by age 17 with 53 injections and 3 oral doses of rotavirus.

These rapid increases in the vaccine schedule mean that a 6 month old baby born today would receive over 2.5 times the number of vaccines as the maximum permitted for a 6 year old back in the 1980’s.  And, by the time that same baby was 12 years old, he/she would have received over 7x the number of vaccines as a child born 30 years ago.

Predictably, children today are suffering from autoimmune disorders, behavioural problems, and physical disabilities at a rate growing in lockstep with the skyrocketing number of shots.

One in every two children suffers from a chronic problem today and the situation is only growing worse with each passing year.

Here’s the rub.

The CDC will never stop adding to the immunization schedule as long as pharmaceutical manufacturers are protected from ALL liability of injury and death. There are currently 271 new vaccines in the pipeline just waiting to be finalized and gain approval from the FDA .  There is absolutely no incentive to make existing or new vaccines safe or keep the schedule at a reasonable level since the passage of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act.

Will you be following the newly revised CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule or have you concluded as I did 18 years ago that the risks to your child’s long term health from following this insane vaccination schedule far outweigh the small risks of not vaccinating ?

CDC Immunization Schedule Changes for 2016

For those that want to know the exact changes to the CDC immunization schedule, here are the most notable changes as outlined by Medscape:

  • In the 2016 CDC immunization chart, a row has been added for the new meningococcal B vaccine. It contains a purple bar denoting the recommendation to vaccinate certain high-risk persons aged 10 years and older and a blue bar denoting the recommendation for administration to non-high-risk groups subject to individual clinical decision making for individuals aged 16 through 23 years (the preferred age range is 16 – 18 years).
  • For human papillomavirus immunization, the new vaccine nomenclature has been changed to “9vHPV,” to denote Merck’s Gardasil 9, which was licensed in December 2014 to replace the prior 4-valent version. On the chart, the HPV row contains an additional purple bar from age 9 to 10 years, denoting a recommendation to vaccinate high-risk children in that group, including those with a history of sexual abuse

Source*

Related Topics:

17 Year Old’s Life Ruined by the Gardasil Vaccine*

13 Year Old World Karate Champion Forced to Quit After Gardasil Vaccine*

Parents Stop Unethical Forced HPV Vaccine*

Five Year Old Girl Died from the MMR Vaccine Required for Kindergarten*

Pathologists Confirm Vaccines Responsible for Baby’s Death*

Waking Up to Vaccine Discrimination*

New Federal Bill Lowers Standards on Poor Standards for Experimental Vaccine Licensing*

Who was Paid what for your Vaccine Rights*

Author of Mandatory Meningitis Vaccine Bill Caught Taking $420k From Big Pharma*

Universal Vaccinations for Children will be Overseen by Committee which Accepts Vaccine Manufacturer Monies*

U.S. Citizens March on CDC Headquarters to Protest Vaccine Corruption*

The Gates Foundation and their Fraudulent Vaccine Empire is Under Fire*

Documents from U.K. reveal 30 Years of Vaccine Cover-up*

Meningitis Vaccines Suspended At U.K. School After Up to 15 Students Collapse*

Western Governments Are Enslaving Humanity through Vaccines*

Forced Vaccination Bill Killed in Hawaii*

Advertisements

U.K. Cuts to Social Services has Caused the ‘biggest rise in death rates’ since WWII*

U.K. Cuts to Social Services has Caused the ‘biggest rise in death rates’ since WWII*

By James Wright

The Tories’ austerity programme has led to the biggest rise in death rates among the elderly for nearly 50 years. Advisers to Public Health England (PHE) warned that the 4-year trend may be the worse since World War II.

Data from the Office of National Statistics shows a 5.4% (27,000) increase in deaths in the past year alone, prompting calls for an urgent investigation.

PHE said the elderly were bearing the worst of Tory austerity cuts, with women suffering disproportionately because they live longer.

Professor Danny Dorling, from Oxford University, an advisor to PHE on older age life expectancy, said:

“When we look at 2015, we are not just looking at one bad year. We have seen excessive mortality – especially among women – since 2012.”

Figures show that the number of deaths had fallen steadily since the 70s, as should be expected, as our healthcare and technology advance. But since 2011, a year after the government began their austerity programme, deaths rates began to increase rapidly. The Conservatives are taking us back into the past with deep cuts, and the elderly are falling by the wayside.

Once other factors are considered, and longer periods examined, public health experts say the current trend is the worst since World War II.

Dorling cited Tory austerity as the biggest cause:

“I suspect the largest factor here is cuts to social services – to meals on wheels, to visits to the elderly.”

Indeed, meals on wheels were cut by a whopping 63% under the coalition government. We are now seeing the elderly die as a result of what is an economically illiterate policy anyway. Cutting meals on wheels will mean more elderly people will have to enter a care home or hospital. George Osborne and the Conservatives are fatally mishandling Britain’s finances.

The Tory-controlled Local Government Association’s (LGA) finance spokeswoman Sharon Taylor, warned in 2015:

“We have got a crisis now in social care funding. Our services are at breaking point and they are at breaking point now.”

The LGA also said cuts would hit the elderly in poorest areas the hardest. Osborne’s toxic blend of budget cuts and raises to council tax have instigated a fatal economic apartheid in our country. New powers to increase council tax can only be employed in wealthier areas where the residents can afford it. The revenue must then be spent on maintaining social care. While the elderly in poorer areas are left to fend for themselves, with devastating consequences.

David Simmonds, the Conservative vice-chair of the LGA, said:

“If you are in one of those areas with a very low council tax base, what you are likely to be saying is that, unless you are someone who physically cannot get out of bed, have a wash and feed yourself, or make a drink without someone coming round to your house, you are not going to get any help at all.”

Under this Tory government, the well-off will survive and the poorest will be left to die. This is as a result of an austerity programme that is completely at odds with mainstream macroeconomics. In fact, there is a near consensus among economists now that austerity is bad for the economy. Even the Conservative IMF concur.

And they are correct. A look at public debt trends shows that when Thatcherite policies began in 1979, public debt has steadily risen from 45% to 80% of GDP. Compare this to a decrease from 225% to 45% of GDP after investing heavily in the NHS and social housing after World War II, and it is clear that investment based growth, and calculated government spending, is what makes the nation money.

This Conservative government are on an ideological crusade, which is completely at odds with the evidence, to shrink the welfare state and privatise our essential services, in a wealth transfer from the poor to the rich. The profits of these services are now privatised, but the losses will be socialised. As can be seen with the obscene subsidies we pay to line the pockets of shareholders in our privatised rail services.

Concentrated, private wealth has increased dramatically amid deep Tory cuts. The 1,000 richest families in Britain have more than doubled their net wealth since the economic crisis caused by the banks’ excessive lending.

A Department of Health spokesman said:

“This is provisional data and our experts monitor deaths closely. Excess winter deaths can be due to a number of causes and deaths can fluctuate from year to year”.

Winter is not a new factor. We have winter every year. However, what is a new factor is deep Tory cuts, representing a strong correlation between relentless austerity and people dying. There has been a dramatic increase in cuts to social services, and a corresponding, dramatic four-year increase in death rates among the elderly.

Professor Dorling continued:

“The statistics clearly show that this is the biggest rise we have seen since the 1960s. But this may well turn out to be the greatest rise since the second world war, taking into account the sustained nature of the rise, as well as other factors, such as the trend for immigration by older people in the 1960s.”

If the Tories were unaware mortality rates would rise then they have failed to carry out proper impact assessments for their cuts, which is possibly even worse than if they knew. Despite medical and technological advances, the Tories are steering us blindly more than half a century into the past.

This data is perhaps the strongest indictment of austerity yet. This Conservative government’s ideological agenda is killing the British people, and it must be wholeheartedly rejected.

Source*

Related Topics:

U.K. Breaking the Social Contract Set’s it Back to Post-WWII*

Eugenics: UN “Death Targets” include the Elderly*

Cameron’s Mother and Aunt Protest against his Cruel Cuts to Children’s Services*

Food Poverty in the U.K. Causing Soar in ‘Victorian’ Illnesses*

U.K. Doctors Want NHS Out of TTIP Now*

20,000 Doctors Protest in London*

U.K. GPs to Gather Info on Sick Patients for the State*

U.K. Gov to Invest an Extra £1.2bn in Syria*

U.K. Secretively Scraps Free Meal Grants for Poorest Primary School Children*

U.S. Base Released 21,000 Litres of Chemical Agents into Okinawa Drinking Water Supply*

U.S. Base Released 21,000 Litres of Chemical Agents into Okinawa Drinking Water Supply*

It seems Okinawan residents had good reason to sue the Japanese government and spend over 500 days protesting the relocation of a U.S. base on their land. They had long suspected that U.S. bases were polluting their waterways, and documents released by Freedom of Information Act request appear to prove them right. A recent drinking water contamination in Okinawa may have been caused by a series of accidents at Kadena Air Base, which led to the release of a  minimum 21,000 litres of fire extinguishing agents over the period of 15 years. Some of these agents are toxic.

One incident details how a drunken marine apparently filled a hanger with 1,500 litres of JET-X 2.75%. It is classified as “hazardous” by the U.S. government, and contains chemicals that cause cancer, neurological and reproductive disorders.

What is of particular concern is that the chemicals were allowed to flow into nearby waterways and the ocean, while U.S. military officials chose not to report the incident to Japanese authorities, or even the affected residents.

17,000 litres of fire extinguishing agent was also released over three days in 2001. This was apparently caused by mechanical and electronic malfunctions. Malfunctioning equipment was also blamed for 3,400 litres of liquid released between 2012 and 2014.

The revelation comes as the Okinawa Prefectural Enterprise Bureau announced the results of tests that they had conducted from February 2014 to November of last year. They found high levels of Perfluorooctanesulfonate (a component of fire extinguishing agents) in the waterways near the Kadena base, up to 1,320 ng/L; waterways that supply drinking water to seven municipalities.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considers Perfluorooctanesulfonate to be an emerging contaminant- it is easily absorbed by and accumulates in the blood, kidneys and liver. It is also difficult to remove from the body, and takes nine years to reduce by half. It causes reproductive and developmental problems, with the EPA stating that the limit for safe short-term exposure is 200 ng/L. The highest levels detected are six times higher than the safe short-term exposure limit.

Japan has prohibited the production of Perfluorooctanesulfonate for the last six years, which doesn’t do it any good if the U.S. base keeps expelling the stuff into the waterways.

Email correspondence between base officials regarding the drunk marine incident shows their primary concern; because the incident occurred at night it was “highly unlikely to draw any public notice because the foam would disipate (sic) before morning.” Further, these incidents may be just the tip of the iceberg; the correspondence also reveals that some spills go unreported.

A U.S. Military Base, Okinawa

Though the U.S. and Japan signed an agreement to allow Japanese to visit military facilities in the event of a chemical spill, the wording of the Japan Environmental Governing Standards allows the U.S. military officials to determine when an incident was considered “significant” enough to report to Japanese authorities. Political science professor at Okinawa International University, Manabu Sato, questioned why the U.S. could pick and choose when it wanted to report incidents.

“Okinawa Prefecture and municipalities near the base should conduct an independent investigation into the leaks. Moreover the Japanese government should require the U.S. military to notify it of any potentially harmful leakage — regardless of the amount. To decide the significance of a leak should not be left up to the U.S. military.” 

Source*

Related Topics:

Bayer and U.S. Govt. Knowingly Gave HIV to Thousands of Children*

Russia Bans U.S. Soybeans and Corn over Microbial and GMO Contamination*

U.S. Fed Radioactive Oatmeal to Little Kids*

Fracking Companies Free to Use 70 Million Gallons Of Clean Water in the Midst of U.S. Record Drought*

U.S. Dropped Insects Carrying Anthrax, Cholera, Encephalitis, and Bubonic Plague on North Korea*

U.S. Military Admits It “Misplaced” Bubonic Plague Samples!?

U.S. Plan to Spread Cholera across Syria and Turkey May be Failing*

Many U.S. Children with the Mysterious Respiratory Epidemic Were Vaccinated*

Professor Connects the Dots between Ebola and the U.S. Military Complex*

Scientist Says U.S. Responsible for Ebola Outbreak in west Liberia*

U.S. Opposes Proven Cure for Ebola Confirmed by Sierra Leone*

U.S. and U.K. Flagrant Abuse of Int’l Law*

U.S. and U.K. Flagrant Abuse of Int’l Law*

[ Editor’s Note:  My, my…this was certainly a change of pace for starting the day with a Yellow Brick Road tour of Western hypocrisy and duplicity, brought to us by countries with very high education expenditures for which the return investment, in terms of protecting some reality as to having real democracies, has been reduced to travelling medicine show status.

Our current presidential election slate is a non-shining example of the wasteland that confronts the electorate where a political process seems to winnow out almost all but the bottom of the barrel and mediocre types, with the uber-gangsters getting more entrenched with each election and converting the country into a white collar mafioso plantation of sorts.

Fix a nice fresh cup of coffee and enjoy Mr. Churkin’s review of the wonders of Western democracy and the shining light it has been in terms of being used as a front by the most corrupt elements among usJim W. Dean ]

Russia has presented at the U.N. Security Council on Monday an “express review” of the most flagrant cases of disregard for international law by the United States and the U.K. The list covering events from the mid-20th century to the present day has been read out by Russia’s deputy permanent representative to the U.N. Pyotr Ilyichev in response to accusations against Moscow over developments in Ukraine and Crimea’s reunification with Russia.

Russian UN envoy: Russia supports realistic initiatives on United Nations reform

“Some delegations have spoken today of violations of the principles of the U.N. Charter unsubstantially accusing Russia of this. To prevent this wishful thinking from creating the wrong impression, let me make an ‘express review’ of the most flagrant cases of disregard for international law, including the purposes and principles of the UN Security Council over the past few decades, the more so since they have apparently been forgotten,” the diplomat said at the debate dedicated to maintaining international peace and security.

U.N. condemnation

He drew attention, in particular, to Britain’s bombing of the Yemeni city of Harib in 1946, noting that the U.N. Security Council condemned these actions in its Resolution 188 “pointing to the incompatibility of reprisals with the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter.” “In 1983, the United States carried out an armed invasion of Grenada.

The General Assembly, in its Resolution 37/8, called these U.S. actions ‘a flagrant violation of international law.’ Many people probably know about the response by the then U.S.  President [Ronald Reagan – TASS] to this document that the news did not spoil his appetite at breakfast,” Ilyichev said.

UN veto power key guarantor of restraint, counterbalance — Russia FM

“According to him, in 1986 the United States carried out an attack against Libya and in 1989 invaded Panama. In both cases these actions were met with condemnation from the U.N. General Assembly, which qualified them as a violation of international law. The Russian diplomat noted that violations of the U.N. Charter were registered by the International Court of Justice as well.

“For example, in the first in its history decision on the 1946 case of Corfu Channel the court recognized that the U.K. had violated Albania’s sovereignty. The ruling on the 1986 Nicaragua vs U.S. case is well-known. The court pointed out bluntly that the U.S. had violated Nicaragua’s sovereignty and the norms of non-interference in internal affairs and non-use of force,” Ilyichev said.

From Yugoslavia to Syria

According to Ilyichev, “irresponsible attitude” of the U.S. and its allies to the U.N. Charter continued and resulted in the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 and the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Then came Libya where “with allegedly disinterested outside help the fire broke out that destroyed the state leaving ashes and chaos in its place,” the diplomat said.

Serbia, Montenegro mark 15 years from start of Yugoslavia’s bombings

He noted that “it was such unlawful interference in the form of illegitimate air strikes or arms deliveries to non-government armed groups” that led to the growth of radical sentiment in Syria that ultimately “resulted in the emergence and strengthening of such terrible phenomena” as the Islamic State (IS) terrorist group (banned in Russia).

“The effects of the invasion of Libya and Syria are striking in their scope. These are terrible suffering of civilians, the destruction of the cultural heritage of mankind and the unprecedented migrant crisis,” Ilyichev said.

He went on to say that 70 years after the end of World War II the basic principles underlying the system of international relations “are becoming an inconvenient obstacle for some and, as a result, are exposed to all sorts of interpretations or are just sidestepped.”

Apparently, the presumption of their own exclusiveness have long made it possible for some countries to put themselves above the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter,” the diplomat said referring to a well-known remark of U.S. President Barack Obama about the “exclusiveness” of the American nation.

Moscow says Turkey continues assisting terrorists getting into Syria

Venezuelan Foreign Ministry: they are trying to split up Syria

The debate at the U.N. Security Council was chaired by Venezuelan Foreign Minister Delcy Rodriguez. She pointed to the need to respect the sovereignty of states and other fundamental principles enshrined in the U.N. Charter – the right of peoples to self-determination, peaceful settlement of disputes and promoting the spirit of cooperation and non-aggression.

Regarding the situation in Syria, Rodriguez pointed to the attempts to split this Arab country into pieces ignoring the will of its people. According to her, “certain countries for whom their national interests are a priority” are interfering in Syria’s internal affairs.

She drew attention to the fact that, while the developing nations are strictly abiding by the U.N. Charter, the rich powers are acting contrary to it resorting to “unilateral acts of aggression” and demonstrating determination to dominate the market of natural resources. According to Rodriguez, this has led to the growing economic inequality, discrimination, Islamophobia and the undermining of the peoples’ right to self-determination.

NATO heads the KFOR peace keeping mission in Kosovo, July 14, 1999 © AP Photo/Luca Bruno

 

NATO is a military alliance with the purpose of collective defence. NATO conducts military operations of two kinds: peace keeping and peace enforcing ones. The difference is that peace keeping actions are realized with the mutual agreement of  the parties involved. The ground base for interference in peace enforcing operations is a resolution of the United Nations security council. In reality, however, such operations have taken place without U.N’s approval: in 1995 NATO forces interfered in the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina with no U.N approval, neither was sanctioned the 1999 NATO bombardment of Yugoslavia. The most widely known large-scale military operations of the NATO in this photo gallery by ITAR-TASS

More >>>

Related Topics:

The U.N.: Pretending to Oppose War for 70 Years – An Open Letter*

U.N. Report on How Israel Coordinates with ISIS inside Syria*

From Child Trafficking to Head of U.N. Ops. in Haiti

US And Israeli Pressured Nigeria To Sell Out Palestine At U.N.*

What I’ve Learnt About US Foreign Policy*

U.S. Army Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson on Perpetual War to Maintain the Empire*

Pope Francis signed off a binding “Galactic Agreement”*

Global Stocks Continue To Crash as Oil Plummets and Gold Skyrockets*

Pope Francis signed off a binding “Galactic Agreement”*

Britain at Forefront of Deadly Mercenary Trade*

Media Campaign for Cameron’s New War*

Europe is Built on Corpses and Plunder*

European Parliament Calls for Action to Protect Religious Minorities against ISIS, “War Crimes” and “Crimes against Humanity”*

U.K. Gov to Invest an Extra £1.2bn in Syria*

British Forces Face Criminal Probe Over 52 Afghan Murders*

Russia has had enough: No more ‘business as usual’ with U.S.*

Why Apartheid Still Exists in South Africa*

U.K. Illegally at War in Yemen*

Congress Removes Ban on Funding Neo-Nazis*

Washington Planning a Syrian invasion by Turkey and Saudi Arabia to split Syria in half with Washington controlling the Oil Fields*

Washington Planning a Syrian invasion by Turkey and Saudi Arabia to split Syria in half with Washington controlling the Oil Fields*

By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

While you are enjoying your Sunday, the insane neoconservatives who control Western foreign policy and their Turkish and Saudi Arabian vassals might be preparing the end of the world.

Any person who relies on Western media has no accurate idea of what is happening in Syria.
I will provide a brief summary and then send you to two detailed accounts.

The neoconservative Obama regime set-up the Syrian government headed by Assad for overthrow. A long propaganda campaign conducted in Washington’s behalf by the Western media portrayed the democratically-elected Assad as a “brutal dictator who uses chemical weapons against his own people.” Washington organized and supported a front group posing as democrats and involved them in conflict with the Syrian military.

With conflict underway, Washington began predicting that something had to be done to overthrow Assad before he used “chemical weapons against his own people.” Obama turned these predictions into a “red line.” When Assad used chemical weapons against Washington’s puppets, the U.S. would invade Syria.

With the “red line” drawn, a false flag chemical weapons attack was staged, or an accident occurred, that Washington used to say that Assad, despite the U.S. warning, had crossed the “red line.”

Preparations for an invasion began, but hit two roadblocks. David Cameron, Washington’s puppet prime minister of Great Britain was unable to deliver British support for the invasion as the Parliament voted it down. This left Washington uncovered and vulnerable to the charge of naked aggression, a war crime.

Russian diplomacy threw up the other road block by securing the removal of all chemical weapons from Syria.

Their invasion plan frustrated, the neoconservatives sent the jihadists they had used to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya to overthrow Assad. Initially known as ISIS, then ISIL, then the Islamist State, and now Daesh, a term that can be interpreted as an insult. Perhaps the intention of the name changes is to keep the Western public thoroughly confused about who is who and what is what.

Washington now pretends that it is fighting the Islamist State, but Washington is doing its best to frustrate the success of the Russian/Syrian alliance that is defeating the Islamist State..

Washington’s support of the Islamist State is the cause of the war in Syria. General Michael Flynn, the recently retired head of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has stated publicly that it was a “willful decision” of the Obama regime to support ISIS.

See: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/iraq-war-isis-michael-flynn_us_565c83a9e4b079b2818af89c

The neoconservative insistence that “Assad must go” comprises a threat to the security of Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hezbollah is the Lebanese force that has twice defeated Israel’s attempt to annex southern Lebanon for its water resources. Hezbollah is dependent on Syrian and Iranian support for its arms and financing. Israel wants rid of Hezbollah.

The Islamic State that Washington is trying to create in Syria would provide Washington with a means of destabilizing Iran and Russia by exporting jihadism into those countries. The Russian Federation has Muslim populations as do former provinces of the Soviet Union that now cooperate with Russia. By bogging down Russia in internal conflicts, Washington can move Russia out of the way of Washington’s exercise of hegemony. Similarly, non-Persian populations in Iran could be radicalized by jihadism and used to destabilize Iran.

In order to protect themselves, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah have come to the support of Syria. The Russians are there legally at the invitation of the Syrian government. The U.S. is there illegally.

Russian air power in support of the Syrian Army has turned the tide against the Islamist State. The invaders are being driven out. The neoconservatives cannot accept this defeat.

Washington is preparing a Syrian invasion by Turkey and Saudi Arabia, the purpose of which is to split Syria in half with Washington controlling the eastern part with the oil fields.

Possibly this is a bluff to get Russia to accept a Syrian settlement less favourable to Russian, Iranian, and Syrian interests. However, the Russian government cannot risk that it is only a bluff. If a U.S./Turkish/Saudi force were to arrive first in Raqqa and Deir Ezzor, Syria would be dismembered.

The Russians can get there first by dropping in paratroopers. In other words, what the insane neoconservatives are doing is giving the Russian government a big incentive to introduce Russian ground troops into the conflict. Once those troops are there, you can safely bet that the insane neoconservatives will cause conflict between them and U.S./Turkish forces. A wider war will have begun from which neither side can back down.

Here is a description of the race to Raqqa: http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/02/the-race-to-raqqa-is-on-to-keep-its-unity-syria-must-win-.html

Here is The Saker’s take on the seriousness of the situation: http://thesaker.is/week-eighteen-of-the-russian-intervention-in-syria-a-dramatic-escalation-appears-imminent/

Source*

Saudi Arabia moves planes to Turkey, Joint attack on Russian, Syrian and Kurdish forces begins

By Gordon Duff

Confirmed: Russian and Syrian jets are on standby to shoot down any Turkish or Saudi plane that crosses into Syria. Turkey is prepared to close the Bosporus and attack Russian ships in the Mediterranean.

Turkey has begun continuous shelling of YPG Kurds (pro-American) inside Syria for at least 3 hours; this is seen as a prelude to a ground attack on anti-ISIS forces inside Syria

VT is back up after being hacked for several hours when one key story was up — the one below on the Saudis moving tactical nukes to Turkey, to be closer to the NW Syrian battleground, and the NATO tripwire for any attack that might be launched on Syria after some staged provocation.

This comes the day after Munich started, with the Turks shelling Azaz, 4 to 5 miles south of the Turkish border — the last town on that supply road to Aleppo.

With this shelling, Turkey is in effect saying they are initiating an “artillery buffer zone”, something most would consider a repudiation of the Munich cessation of hostilities. If the Kurds and Syria can move closer to their own borders, they can mine the roads to slow down any Turkish advance.

We also suspect today’s hacking to have been an eavesdropping event to delay a new story we are working on — how Turkey has purchased swine flu from an employee at the Lugar lab in Georgia, which already has killed 1000 in Ukraine, been released in Russia, and surprise, surprise beginning to show up in the Turkish Kurdish resistance. 

A $30-million budgeted American Research lab in Tbilisi that came in at $100 million with a contractor making a lot of money. Are you surprised?

This morning our sources are reporting that Turkey is bringing into the Syrian Kurdish region, via the age old ambulance cover, a part of its biological weapons warfare that it thinks it will be able to deny. But after the big Sarin gas attack in Syria that was tracked back to Turkish involvement, the Lugar lab and other bio-weapons undercover labs ringing the Russian Federation have been watched very carefully for the obvious threat that they were.

Silverman paid a price for his reporting

VT readers know that Henry Kamens and our own Jeffrey Silverman have been all over the story for several years now, to the extent that the Lugar lab had to be “cleaned” for a press tour.

We do not know how much U.S. and NATO cooperation there may be, if any, on this. Erdogan was busting a guy this week for denouncing the U.S. for working with the Syrian Kurds, a touché to Erdogan for not really fighting ISIL, but using that as a cover to run his war on the Kurds.

Turkey and the Saudis see the jihadis being rolled up in Syria in a couple of months, so they are holding little territory to bargain with at the future peace talks, if there ever are any.

We have a touch and go situation in the success of the Syrian-Russian anti-terrorism campaign. The U.S. coalition, the Arab League, all those that supported the overthrow of Syria have a lot of egg on their face, as support for Assad and the Syrian army is going up every day — not the kind of situation in which the regime change crowd want to negotiate. You just can’t make this stuff upJim W. Dean ]

Tactical nukes will be used in any major preemptive strike to assure retaliation ability is destroyed on day one

Our sources confirm that Saudi Arabia has delivered tactical nuclear weapons to Turkey.  Turkey already has 84 nuclear weapons at Incirlik Air Base under NATO control.  We have confirmed that both Saudi Arabia and Turkey have American planes, both F 15 and F 16 modified for nuclear attack by Israel.  America has removed all nuclear attack planes from Turkey under orders of President Obama.

We have confirmed that Turkey has a contingency plan to seize the NATO nuclear arsenal at Incirlik with the help of Saudi Special Forces, who have been trained in Israel to defeat US nuclear weapon security measures.

We have a confirmation that Saudi Arabia is moving planes to the American nuclear base in Turkey.  This week U.S. planes bombed civilians in Aleppo from this same base.  Word from Saudi Arabia and Russia is that they expect a full scale Turkish invasion in response to Kurdish YPG consolidation, with American help, of new positions which would block Turkey’s access to its ISIS partners in Syria.

Both high level Russian and Syrian sources contacted this morning have confirmed that a much broader war is imminent.

Turkey has officially announced that they are ready to move into Syria against the U.S. backed YPG who they deem as a terrorist group.  Turkey has yet to attack ISIS and is only fighting Kurds with the exception of the Erbil regional group in Iraq.  There is conclusive evidence that both Erbil and Ankara are fully behind ISIS.

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said. “They (Saudi military) came, did a reconnaissance of the base. At the moment it is not clear how many planes will come.”

Turkey supplies ISIS in Iraq through the Duhok road aided by the Erbil regime, who have turned against both Baghdad and other Kurdish forces.

Related Topics:

Kerry Calls For Peace as NATO Proxies Lose Ground in Syria*

Turkey-Russia Tensions Spike as Russia Moves into Rothschild-Murdoch Illegal Stake, Northern Syria*

Israel Grants Oil Rights in Syria to Murdoch and Rothschild*

U.S. Bombs Aleppo Blames Russia*

Syrian Army Reclaims Aleppo*

By Any Mean Obama Will have More War*

Turkey Bombards Kurdish-held Areas of Syria’s Aleppo Province*

Kidnapped Russian Pilot Describes How It is Legal to Lie in the U.S.*

Thousands of Terrorists in Syria Flee to North Aleppo*

The Occult and U.S. Evacuation of ISIS/Israeli Military Commanders from Ramadi*

Britain at Forefront of Deadly Mercenary Trade*

Why is Vladimir Putin Meeting War Monger Kissinger?

Europe is Built on Corpses and Plunder*

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was Found Dead with a Pillow over his Head*

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was Found Dead with a Pillow over his Head*

By Alex Thomas

Two days after the untimely death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia questions are beginning to mount as to what actually happened at the Cibolo Creek Ranch where Scalia was found dead of what is being reported as “natural causes”.

Almost immediately after his death, official sources and mainstream media talking heads began to report that there was no sign of foul play and that the famed conservative justice had most likely died alone in his room after retiring from dinner early the night before.

Now, that narrative is being thrown into serious question after revelations that Scalia was found with a pillow over his head and that Presidio County Judge Cinderela Guevara actually decided against ordering an autopsy without even seeing the body.

That’s right, a Supreme Court Justice was found dead and the justice of the peace who was contacted didn’t even actually see the body, having instead been assured by officials on the scene that there was no foul play involved. Nope, not suspicious at all…..

WFAA 8 News reported:

“She planned to drive to the ranch — about 30 minutes south of Marfa — but returned when a U.S. Marshal told her by phone:

“It’s not necessary for you to come, judge. If you’re asking for an autopsy, that’s what we need to clarify.”

Judge Guevara said she wanted to clarify details of Scalia’s death before deciding whether to order an autopsy.

“As part of my investigation one of the things I did ask the sheriff and the U.S. Marshal: ‘Were there any signs of foul play? And they said, ‘Absolutely not.’ At that time, I still wanted to be careful and asked them if [Scalia’s] physician would call me.”

The justice’s personal doctor called Guevara at 8 p.m. Saturday night

“When [the physician] explained [Scalia] had just visited on Wednesday and Thursday, and [the doctor] had done an MRI, then I felt comfortable what I knew was going on with him physically,” she said.

So literally one of the most important human beings in American law is found dead and we are just supposed to take the word of a sheriff and still unnamed U.S. Marshals?!?

And while the mainstream media is using every bit of misinformation in their playbook to pretend that this was totally normal, it in fact was not and another justice of the peace has already called Guevara’s decision into question.

Speaking with the Washington Post, Juanita Bishop made clear that if she had been called she would not have decided that no autopsy was needed for one of the most important figures in America without even seeing the body.

“If it had been me . . . I would want to know,” Bishop told The Post.

Startlingly, this is not the only serious issue in the narrative that says Scalia died from natural causes as it is now being reported that when he was found dead in his bedroom he actually had a pillow over his face! This is being reported in multiple one line sentences within major reports on the justices death as if it was just a random, unimportant detail.

“We discovered the judge in bed, a pillow over his head. His bed clothes were unwrinkled,” said Houston businessman John Poindexter, the owner of the 30,000-acre luxury ranch,according to the Houston Chronicle.

Poindexter goes on to describe Scalia as looking like he was resting peacefully, apparently unaware that a pillow over the man’s head looks extremely suspicious.

These important details may only be the tip of the iceberg as it has been barely two days since Scalia’s death and a counter narrative to what actually took place is already beginning to form.

You would think that the mainstream press would be all over a story with such significance. A Supreme Court Justice found dead under highly suspicious circumstances? That has Pulitzer Prize written all over it yet for their part the mainstream media has simply reported the details as given to them by authorities while focusing a good portion of their time actually attacking anyone who questions Scalia’s death.

While many hit pieces and snarky Twitter updates lampooning anyone who questions the official narrative have already been published, one stands out for its audacity to just straight up lie about the person they are attacking.

Self described Zionist liberal JE Reich, possibly hoping to get the attention of a bigger mainstream news outlet, (I mean really, who’s journalistic goals would end at writing for a rag like Jezebel?) decided to attack famed alternative media personality Alex Jones after he posted a Facebook video questioning whether or not Scalia was killed.

What makes this attack so unbelievable is that it starts out with a paragraph that directly and, seemingly purposefully, lies about Jones, even providing links that actually show it to be pure nonsense.

Reich wrote:

“Noted conspiracy theorist, Illuminati-believer, racist and “lovable” anti-Semite Alex Jones has made yet another grab for the spotlight. After reports of the passing of conservative U.S. Supreme Justice Antonin Scalia on February 13, the founder of the site InfoWars.com said he believes that Scalia was murdered in a government plot that makes Scandal look like the most boring fairy tale.”

WOW. So right off the bat Reich is signalling to her readers that only a racist anti-Semite would question Scalia’s death so therefore we should all just ignore everything he is saying and instead make fun of him.

Reich hyperlinks the words racist and anti-Semite in an apparent attempt to “prove” her slanderous claims but when you actually click on the links they do not take you to any sort of proof at all. One is of a video from a hard left organization that literally puts together multiple different clips from Jones radio show in an attempt to prove he is a racist. Even with the video being purposefully taken out of context, Jones says nothing a normal person would consider racist.

Worse, the second link takes the reader to a Forbes article describing who Jones is that doesn’t call him an anti-Semite at all. In fact, the only part of the entire article that even deals with the topic is in a description of Charlie Sheen’s appearance on his radio show that led to Sheen getting fired from CBS. The author of the Forbes piece writes:

“For the record, Jones himself has long taken pains to distance himself from overt anti-Semitism or racism of any kind.”

Essentially a writer for the hipster feminist website Jezebel just decided to call Jones names with absolutely no proof in an attempt to stop readers from even considering if Scalia was murdered.

While only one example, the hit piece by Reich is a perfect example of how the mainstream media operates which is to attack the messenger with lies and misinformation whenever said messenger is speaking about something the powers that be do not want widely believed.

To recap, Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead at a luxury ranch in Texas. Instead of examining the body to decide if an autopsy was needed, the justice of the peace made the decision over the phone after the feds “told her” there was no foul play. To top it off, Scalia was found dead with a pillow over his head.

All this in only two days yet the mainstream media is already busy at work writing hit pieces that lie and misinform the public about news outlets who are questioning the official narrative.

It’s also extremely important to note that the death of Scalia is literally one of the most important happenings in decades. His death could allow the hard left to install a justice that will be the deciding vote in multiple moves to completely gut the Constitution.

Obviously there was a major motive for murdering him.

Source*

No Conspiracy in Scalia’s Death

From Alexandra Bruce

Given Scalia’s political hard right affiliations and friendships and that former Vice President, Dick Cheney’s accidental shooting of attorney, Harry Whittington, also while quail hunting occurred ten years ago – almost to the day – at another Texas ranch, many sloppy reporters assumed that the John Poindexter in question was the former National Security Advisor appointed by Ronald Reagan, who was convicted on 5 counts of lying to Congress during the Iran-Contra Affair – but who was somehow able to resurrect his career, to help establish the first publicly-acknowledged dragnet surveillance operation on the American People in 2003, the Total Information Awareness Office (TIA). The TIA has undergone a couple of name changes, due to adverse public reaction to its existence. Yet, it remains in existence and is now simply called the Information Awareness Office.

However, the John Poindexter who owns the historic Cibolo Creek Ranch where Scalia was found dead is NOT the same John Poindexter.John B. Poindexter is the self-made millionaire, owner of JB Poindexter & Co. Inc., manufacturer of trucks, including those used by UPS and FedEx. John B Poindexter is a “committed Independent” who has occasionally donated to Democratic Party causes. (Definitely not the same guy!)

Due to the remoteness of the location of the ranch, Scalia’s death was ruled to be of natural causes over the phone, by the Presidio County judge, Cinderela Guevara. This was after she had consulted law enforcement officials at the scene, as well as with Scalia’s physician, who confirmed that he had a heart condition and had recently been deemed “too weak” to undergo rotator cuff surgery. In accordance with the wishes of the family of Justice Scalia, no autopsy was performed and his body was flown home to Virginia.

Related Topics:

NSA’s Medical Intelligence Hit List*

Jimmy Carter: The U.S. Is an “Oligarchy with Unlimited Political Bribery”*

First Amendment Rights – Citizens Can No Longer Collect Soil Evidence*

Journalist Wins Fifth Amendment Case*

Arizona Child Traffick Racketeering via CPS and Doctors on Trial before U.S. Supreme Court*

Three Supreme Court Justices Ruling on Companies Whose Stock they Own*

Study Finds Clear Differences between Organic and non-Organic Milk and Meat*

Study Finds Clear Differences between Organic and non-Organic Milk and Meat*

In the largest study of its kind, an international team of experts led by Newcastle University, U.K., has shown that both organic milk and meat contain around 50% more beneficial omega-3 fatty acids than conventionally produced products.

Analyzing data from around the world, the team reviewed 196 papers on milk and 67 papers on meat and found clear differences between organic and conventional milk and meat, especially in terms of fatty acid composition, and the concentrations of certain essential minerals and antioxidants.

Publishing their findings today in the British Journal of Nutrition, the team say the data show a switch to organic meat and milk would go some way towards increasing our intake of nutritionally important fatty acids.

Chris Seal, Professor of Food and Human Nutrition at Newcastle University explains:

“Omega-3s are linked to reductions in cardiovascular disease, improved neurological development and function, and better immune function.

“Western European diets are recognised as being too low in these fatty acids and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommends we should double our intake.

“But getting enough in our diet is difficult. Our study suggests that switching to organic would go some way towards improving intakes of these important nutrients.”

Western European diets are too low in omega-3 fatty acids

The systematic literature reviews analyzed data from around the world and found that organic milk and meat have more desirable fat profiles than conventional milk and meat.

Most importantly, a switch from conventional to organic would raise omega-3 fat intake without increasing calories and undesirable saturated fat. For example, half a litre of organic full fat milk (or equivalent fat intakes from other dairy products like butter and cheese) provides an estimated 16% (39 mg) of the recommended, daily intake of very long-chain omega-3, while conventional milk provides 11% (25 mg).

Other positive changes in fat profiles included lower levels of myristic and palmitic acid in organic meat and a lower omega-3/omega-6 ratio in organic milk. Higher levels of fat soluble vitamins such as vitamin E and carotenoids and 40% more CLA in organic milk were also observed.

The study showed that the more desirable fat profiles in organic milk were closely linked to outdoor grazing and low concentrate feeding in dairy diets, as prescribed by organic farming standards.

The two new systematic literature reviews also describe recently published results from several mother and child cohort studies linking organic milk and dairy product consumption to a reduced risk of certain diseases. This included reduced risks of eczema in babies.

Newcastle University’s Professor Carlo Leifert, who led the studies, said:

“People choose organic milk and meat for three main reasons: improved animal welfare, the positive impacts of organic farming on the environment, and the perceived health benefits. But much less is known about impacts on nutritional quality, hence the need for this study.

“Several of these differences stem from organic livestock production and are brought about by differences in production intensity, with outdoor-reared, grass-fed animals producing milk and meat that is consistently higher in desirable fatty acids such as the omega-3s, and lower in fatty acids that can promote heart disease and other chronic diseases.”

Avoiding iodine over- and under-supply from milk is a challenge

The study also found 74% more iodine in conventional milk which is important information, especially for U.K. consumers, where iodized table salt is not widely available.

Iodine is low in most foods, except seafood, and the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends Iodine fortification of table salt to address this. Iodine fortification of cattle feeds is also widely used to increase iodine concentrations in both organic and conventional milk.

Gillian Butler, co-author and senior lecturer in animal nutrition at Newcastle University, explains:

“There is a relatively narrow margin between dietary Iodine deficiency (<140 µg/day) and excessive intakes (> 500 µg/day) from our diet which can lead to thyrotoxicoxis.

“Optimising iodine intake is therefore challenging, since globally there seems to be as much concern about excessive rather than inadequate intake.”

In the USA, China, Brazil and many European countries, where Iodine fortified salt is widely used, elevated levels of iodine in milk may increase the risk of excessive intake for individuals with high dairy consumption. For this reason the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has proposed a reduction in the permitted level of iodine in cattle feed from 5 to 2 mg iodine per kg of feed.

However, in the UK, where iodized salt is not widely available, the population relies more on milk and dairy products for adequate iodine supply. National Diet and Nutrition Survey data (NDNS) suggest that milk and dairy products supply between 31-52% of iodine in the U.K. diet.

The daily recommended intake of iodine in the UK is 140 µg/day and just over half comes from dietary sources other than milk/dairy products. Based on results from the study, half a litre of milk would provide 53% of and 88% of the daily recommended intake from organic and conventional milk respectively. However, pregnant and breastfeeding women have a higher iodine requirement (250 µg/day) and are therefore more at risk of iodine deficiency, which could affect neurological development in babies.

Further evidence of the health benefits of organic food

The work builds on a previous study by the team — involving experts from the U.K., U.S., France, Italy, Switzerland, Norway and Poland — investigating the composition of organic and conventionally-grown crops.

This previous study — also published in the British Journal of Nutrition — showed that organic crops and crop-based foods are up to 60% higher in a number of key antioxidants than conventionally-grown crops and contained less of the toxic metal cadmium.

“We have shown without doubt there are composition differences between organic and conventional food. Taken together, the three studies on crops, meat and milk suggest that a switch to organic fruit, vegetables, meat and dairy products would provide significantly higher amounts of dietary antioxidants and omega-3 fatty acids,” concludes Professor Leifert.

“We need substantially more, well designed studies and surveys before we can accurately estimate composition differences in meat from different farm animals and for many nutritionally important compounds (vitamins, minerals, toxic metal and pesticide residues), as there is currently too little data to make comparisons.

“However, the fact that there are now several mother and child cohort studies linking organic food consumption to positive health impacts shows why it is important to further investigate the impact of the way we produce our food on human health.

The authors highlight that only a small number of studies have been carried out comparing organic and non-organic meat, and that even significant results may still carry a high level of uncertainty.

Journal References:

  1. Carlo Leifert et al. Higher PUFA and omega-3 PUFA, CLA, a-tocopherol and iron, but lower iodine and selenium concentrations in organic bovine milk: A systematic literature review and meta- and redundancy analysis. British Journal of Nutrition, February 2016
  2. Carlo Leifert et al. Composition differences between organic and conventional meat; a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Nutrition, February 2016

Source*

Nutrients Mentioned

omega-3 fatty acids

  1. Alpha-linolenic acid – effects the functioning of our immune, inflammatory, cardiovascular, and nervous systems
  2. Eicosapentaenoic acid – deficiency leads to excessive inflammation and inflammation-related disease
  3. Docosahexaenoic acid – responsible for the proper functioning of our brain. DHA accounts for 9-12% of our brain’s total weight

myristic (tetradecanoic acid)

  • Helps the liver to synthesize cholesterol

Palmitic acid (cetylic acid and hexadecanoic acid)

  • Increases mother’s milk, vital to cell membrane and cellular function, whole-body energy homeostasis,

Vitamin E

Carotenoids

  • As antioxidants, helps for protect vision and combating cellular damage, supports cardiovascular health, protects skin, tissue, and cells from environmental toxins and disease

CLA (conjugated Linoleic Acid)

  • Reduces tumours of the breast, colorectal, lung, skin, stomach, protects against cardiovascular disease, regulates body fat

iodine

  • Important to the functioning of the thyroid gland, helps to remove of toxins from the body, helps to maintain maintaining optimal energy levels of the body, assists in the formation of healthy hair and skin, helps in the normal growth and maturity of reproductive organs, strengthens the immune system

Related Topics:

U.K. to Put Fluoride in Milk for School Children*

New Zealand’s ‘The Natural Health Supplementary Products Bill’ Bans Natural Products*

10-Year-Old with “Incurable” Autoimmune Disease Reversed by Simple Dietary Changes*

The Doctor Who Prescribes Fruit and Veg. Instead of Drugs*

Federation of State Medical Boards Seeks to Eliminate Alternative Medicine*

Criminalizing Healthy Food Paves Way for TPP*

Falling Profits and Desperate Junk Food Companies Make Fun of Healthy Diets*

Diet and the Sacrifice of Child Potential!