U.N. Rules That Abortion is a Human Right*

U.N. Rules That Abortion is a Human Right*

Meaning the foetus is not human, and babies are a result of alien abduction… so they can use them for bio-fuel (electricity) as they do in the U.K., and Canada…Only party can have rights, not both, that is why they drown migrants in the ocean so they can’t get to Europe which is bombing their country because only the West has rights, and so it goes on…rich vs. Poor, young vs. Old., able bodied vs. the disabled, Christian vs. Muslim, white vs black.

By Brianna Acuesta

In an unprecedented international decision, the UN has ruled that abortion is a human right.
Though it several years for the UN to make the decision and over a decade for Peru to comply, a young woman from Peru is finally being paid reparations for not being allowed to abort her unborn child.

It all started in 2001, when a 17-year-old woman called K.L. was three months pregnant and her unborn child was diagnosed with anencephaly. This birth defect means that the foetus was developing with little to no forebrain and, if carried to term, the baby would certainly die and would risk the mother’s health as well. The doctor that made the diagnosis recommended that K.L. have an abortion since Peru allows abortion when the life of the mother is at risk.

Despite this exception to the otherwise outlawed practice of abortion, the hospital refused to perform the procedure on the grounds that the State did not provide clear regulations for providing the service. The 17-year-old woman was forced to give birth to her child and then breast feed her for the four days that she survived outside of the womb. K.L. described the remainder of her pregnancy as an “extended funeral” and, after seeing the deformities on her baby and knowing she would not live very long, she sank into a deep depression from which it took years to recover. 

The Centre for Reproductive rights said that the Peruvian hospital illegally denied her right to an abortion and when they learned of the case several months after the baby died in 2002, they took the case to the United Nations Human Rights Council and filed it against the Peruvian government.

It was not until 2005 that the UNHRC declared that Peru, in denying K.L. a legal medical procedure that had a plethora of adverse and long-lasting effects, had violated several articles of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The violations included the right to an effective remedy, prohibition on torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment, the right to private life, and the right of minors to measures of protections.

The decision marked the first time that an international human rights committee had ruled that a government body was accountable for not allowing access to legal abortion services, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights. The UNHRC also demanded that Peru pay reparations to the woman to make up for the mental and physical consequences she faced. Peru did not, however, immediately agree to pay the reparations.

Lilian Sepúlveda, one of the original attorneys K.L. v. Peru who brought the case to the U.N., said that,

““As groundbreaking as this win was for establishing legal precedent, successes like these do not stand on their own. In order to make a difference for our client and women facing similar situations, concrete implementation of the decision is absolutely essential.”

The implementation that Sepúlveda references began in 2014 in Peru. Almost a decade after the U.N. made their decision, Peru adopted national guidelines for safe abortion practices and gave clarity to physicians and patients. The country also finally met with the Centre for Reproductive Rights to negotiate a reparation agreement for K.L., which was paid in December of 2015.

According to Women on Web, 25% of the world’s population lives where there are highly restrictive abortion laws that essentially make a safe abortion illegal. About 13% of maternal deaths worldwide were caused from unsafe abortion practices. 95% of abortions in Latin America and over 97% of abortions in Africa were unsafe in 2008. It is especially important to consider the legality and morality of abortion right now in Latin America because of the rise of Zika virus, where babies are born with small heads and underdeveloped brains. Though the origins of the virus may be highly controversial, the fact that there has been an increase in babies born with this defect is not and should be considered in the debate.
Comment: Oh is that what the Zika Hoax is about…


Related Topics:

Canadian Aborted Babies Used to Facilitate Electricity*

U.N. – NWO’s Ordered Allow Homosexuality and Abortion or Forget Aid*

WHO Tells Governments they must Provide Abortion and Sex Change*

Aborted Baby’s Heart was Beating as the Brain was Harvested*

Legislation Passes to Protect Babies Who Survive Abortion *

They’re Not Baby Parts, They’re ‘Products of Conception’*

Planned Parenthood Selling Aborted Foetus’*

Top Scientists Tell Russia Foetus is Human. Ban Abortion.*

US Senate to Maintain Funding for Overseas Abortion, Population Reduction*

Miracle of Pregnancy: Couple Told to Abort or Die*

Biotech’s Dark Promise of Involuntary Cannibalism for All*