Archive | March 7, 2016

Alabama Lawmaker Introduces Mandatory Castration for Child Sexual Abuse*

Alabama Lawmaker Introduces Mandatory Castration for Child Sexual Abuse*

“They have marked this child for life and the punishment should fit the crime.”

An Alabama lawmaker, State Representative Steve Hurst, plans to introduce a new form of physical punishment for sex offenders — a permanent surgical castration of those found guilty of child sexual abuse in addition to imprisonment, reports a local news portal, News10.

According to the bill, a person over the age of 21 who commits a sex offense against a child 12 years old or younger, would be surgically and permanently castrated before leaving prison.

According to Hurst, such measures would reduce sexual abuse of children in Alabama, but this initiative has predictably received a mixed reception from state residents: while people generally agree that punishment for such a crime should definitely be severe, the idea of permanent physical mutilation does not feel right for some of the respondents.

Hurst, however, is convinced that permanent punishment is justified by what he sees as permanent injury to the victims:

“They have marked this child for life and the punishment should fit the crime,” he said.

The bill will have to pass the judiciary committee before it’s heard by the Alabama House and Senate.

Currently, only 7 states allow voluntary chemical castration as a replacement to imprisonment of those convicted of sexual offenses, and Texas is the only state that currently allows certain repeat offenders to elect surgical castration. Both chemical and surgical method still cause a significant amount of controversy among the lawmakers and the society.


Related Topics:

Oklahoma Plan to Castrate Sex Offenders*

Sexual Violence Ruled a Crime against Humanity in Guatemalan Court*

Refugee Children being Raped in Calais Camp*

Satanic Paedophilia Network Exposed in Australia*

Strangers Brave Paedophile to Save Teen Girl*

Pope Francis Found Guilty Of Child Trafficking, Rape, Murder*

Parents Attacked for Protesting against the Sexualization of their Children*

Sexual Liberation a Tool of Mass Control*

US Military Sexually Abused 54 Colombian Children*

The West Exports Porn, Casual Sex, and the Blood of the pre-born not Freedom*

180,000 Italians Say No to Gender Theory and Sex Education*

Sexual Assaults on Children Rise to 85 a Day in the U.K.*

American College of Paediatricians Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage was a ‘A Tragic Day for America’s Children’*

Norway Bill Would let Kids Change their Sex at Age 7*

Obama Spent $700 Million Promoting Homosexuality Overseas*

Former Bush Official ‘The Ship Is Sinking’*

Former Bush Official ‘The Ship Is Sinking’*

Related Topics:

Cabal Rule Continues to Collapse*

Rothschild Bank Now Under Criminal Investigation*

Eye Witness Account inside Aleppo, Syria*

Clinton Case ‘criminal,’ Grand Jury Convened*

Shell Oil Faces Second Lawsuit in Five Years over Spills in Nigeria*

French Journalist Arrested for Exposing Israeli Connection to Paris False Flag*

Pope Francis Found Guilty Of Child Trafficking, Rape, Murder*

Sexual Violence Ruled a Crime against Humanity in Guatemalan Court*

Black Entertainers Raise over $100,000 in #JusticeForFlint, an Oscars Alternative*

Beware of the Fake ‘Alien Invasion’

The U.S. Military Court Recent Decisions, and the Black Vote*

Johnson and Johnson Ordered to Pay $72M for Knowingly Causing Cancer with Product*

CIA Agent Jailed for Exposing Torturous Racist System that “Must be Torn Down”*

Judge Anna von Reitz: We Are Determined There Will NOT Be a Third World War, We Want the Criminals Recognized as Criminals

Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Files Suit over Israeli Sponsored Gift Bags*

U.S. Soldiers and Wikileaks Come Together to Tell the Truth about What’s Really Happening in the Middle East*

Pakistan Gv’t Warns the Country to Prepare for Global Cooling*

Corbyn Wins 18 Party Elections by a Landslide, but U.K. Media Remains Silent*

Member of Central Park Five Ask Terrifying Question about Donald Trump’s Involvement in Their Conviction*

Freedom Proves Gravity Subject to Another Force ~ LOVE*

Mother Pulls Children Out of School After it Introduced ‘Transgender Awareness Program’*

Haiti Loses another Foul Clinton Picked President*

Every Scientific Law We Have Today Will Be Have to Be Rewritten in the Next 50 Years*

The NWOs TPP Will Be Signed Today, but Congress has to Approve It*

What Really Happened When Iran Captured Two American Vessels*

Uruguay Now Generates Almost 94 Percent of Its Electricity from Renewable Sources*

The Welsh Assembly Blocks Cameron’s Trade Union Bill*

American Muslims Raise Over $190,000 For San Bernardino Victims*

It’s not a Matter of Believing, but a Matter of Being*

The U.S. is At the Centre Of The Global Economic Meltdown*

U.S. Sued over $280bn Tax-deductible Aid Sent to Israel*

Awakening the Conscious Warrior*

Trident’s Profits go Right to the Personal Pockets of Westminster*

Trident’s Profits go Right to the Personal Pockets of Westminster*

By Carlyn Harvey

Trident renewal never seems to be far from the headlines. On 27 February the largest anti-nuclear demonstration in a generation took place in London. On 4 March, the U.K.’s Defence Secretary, Michael Fallon, announced £642m in spending on the nuclear weaponry, even though renewal of the system has not yet been voted on in parliament. It seems that, despite notable public and parliamentary opposition, the Conservative government – and a fair number of Labour MPs – are hell bent on locking us into Trident’s propagation. But, why? Do they really fear for our security, or are there more foul forces at play?

‘Follow the money’ works when light is needed on a murky subject. The Trident debacle is one such issue. Common Space, a Scottish online media outlet, followed the Trident money. What they found is quite simply… nuclear.

The not-so upper chamber

Common Space columnist Steve Topple found that some of Trident’s financial roads lead directly to parliament. The House of Lords, for example, has a fair few of its fingers in the UK’s nuclear pie. Such as the following connections:

Lord Hollick, a Labour peer, is a director at Honeywell International Inc. This company  is contracted to work on a “life-extension programme” for Trident.

Lord Hague, a Conservative peer and ex-Foreign Secretary, is a director at Intercontinental Exchange Inc. This company deals in stock market trading, and is not shy of the defence industry. Hague is also chair of Royal United Services Institute (RUSI). RUSI advises the U.K. government on defence policy, and has been praised by David Cameron:

This institute, created by the Duke of Wellington, has brought about a fine tradition of strategic scholarship…RUSI has encouraged creative thinking on strategy

With these conflicting interests, it would be easy for Hague to turn RUSI’s “strategic” advice into gold for Intercontinental Exchange’s defence investors. His votes in the Lords could also be used for commercial gain, as is true for Hollick. And with the cost of Trident reaching a possible £167bn, there are pretty prizes for everyone with money in the game.

Hiding in the vaults

Common Space also unearthed a vast amount of Trident cash stashed away in the place where it is most usually found: the banks. Their investigation cites a 2012 report, where 41 U.K. financial institutions are implicated in the financing of nuclear weapons. Barclays, HSBC, the Cooperative, and the Royal Bank of Scotland are among them. And they don’t just finance Western nuclear weapons, some finance them around the globe. Even in the countries of our so-called ‘enemies’.

Among the many examples Topple provides, is Russian defence manufacturer Almaz-Antey. Funding for this company is two-fold. It gets money from the Russian government and from Vnesheconombank. Although this bank is state-owned, it does not receive all its money from the government. Some of its resources come from foreign loans. As Topple points out, a 2011 loan was provided by a number of foreign banks, Barclays and HSBC among them.

Perhaps the banking sector are lost so far down their gold-rimmed rabbit hole, that they believe hedging their bets – and money – on all sides of the nuclear threat makes sense. If one country blows half the world away, they’ll still be seeing dividends in the other. Or maybe they just don’t give a long-term damn, as long as their short-term profits keep rolling in.

Common Space, however, has a different theory. Topple suggests that, due to the power of banks and their collusion with governments, the nuclear threat is nothing more than a dumbshow. This performance for the masses is designed to manufacture our consent. It allows those in power to keep the defence industry wheels well greased, with our taxes, so that shares rocket. Topple states:

“The world is intrinsically too financially entwined for either the East or West to ever press ‘the button’ – and to believe they would is, in my opinion, deluded.”

Perhaps, but if this is just an act, in light of recent tensions, NATO and Russia deserve an Oscar. However, what this investigation does prove, beyond the shadow of a doubt, is that the U.K. government cannot be trusted to objectively guide us on Trident renewal. Not when we have vested interests like Hague, within our government. Or a bankers chancellor, like George Osborne, defending bankers‘ bonuses, instead of pushing for a fair banking system for the masses.

Invested in you

Fortunately, there are others voicing opinions on the subject. Jeremy Corbyn, Nicola Sturgeon, Caroline Lucas and Leanne Wood, are all prominent politicians opposed to Trident renewal. There is also the Royal Navy whistleblower, William McNeilly, who sacrificed his career, to expose the failings of the Trident system. McNeilly warned:

“This is bigger than me, it’s bigger than all of us. We are so close to a nuclear disaster it is shocking, and yet everybody is accepting the risk to the public.”

And McNeilly isn’t the only experienced military figure who’s spoken out against Trident. Robert Green, an ex-commander in the Royal Navy, has done so too. In part, Green noted the impact it would have on the wider global community. The U.K. is a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The treaty establishes that:

“those states without nuclear weapons agree not to acquire them and those with nuclear weapons agree to disarm”

Trident’s expiration would be the perfect moment to “disarm”. Green warns the U.K. government’s enthusiasm for renewal sets a dangerous example for the other NPT signatories:

“For the 184 states which have made a treaty commitment to renounce nuclear weapons, the UK’s moral authority is compromised by its nuclear posture.”

These people have very little to gain from raising their hands, except some political capital in the case of the party leaders. By contrast, we have everything to gain from listening to them. A less threatening world, oiled by diplomacy rather than posturing. Not to mention, the elimination of a danger that could destroy much of the planet. It would also provide an opportunity to put billions of pounds to public use, rather than into private pockets that are already stuffed. Surely that is the best deal for our country.

Source *

Related Topics:

British General Threatens ‘Mutiny’ Against Corbyn Leadership*

Nuclear Sarcophagus in Marshall Islands is Leaking*

Japan’s Sakurajima Volcano Erupts 50km from Nuclear Plant*

Government Quietly Admits Weather Modification*

Government Quietly Admits Weather Modification*

By Zen Gardner

As this country inches farther away from the democracy it once pretended to be, the level of propaganda and indoctrination that the average American must wade through in order to get the smallest amount of Truth is staggering. We have reached a point in which Americans are so overwhelmed with the current battle taking place between the Alternative News community and mainstream media, and its barrage of contradicting “Facts,” that most have simply chosen to completely remove themselves from any critical thinking. Even when the government itself reveals an age-old lie to be true, most are so indoctrinated with the idea of the “conspiracy” that they convince themselves that the revelation is just another trick of those deceptiveconspiracy theorists.” This has been seen many times in recent years. A perfect example of this is weather modification.

Weather modification, geoengineering, chemtrails; these are all topics that if brought up in most circles today, would garner the speaker the telltale look that most Truthers have become all too familiar with. It is a look that has been ingrained into all who have opted to cast aside their critical thinking for their comforting daily lie. There is a herd mentality that has been established that causes even those on the fence or those interested in “outside the box” ideas, to fall in line while surrounded by the docile mass. So when the Pasadena Star recently released a government “Notice of Intent” on page 11 of the Classifieds, announcing their plan to begin weather modification in Los Angels County, it became clear that those blank stares should be turned inward, for some much-needed self-reflection and re-evaluation.

Obviously the appropriate area of the paper to release such a controversial topic is the classifieds, where it will no doubt be noticed by all. Sarcasm aside, it is clear they did not want anyone to take notice of this declaration of weather manipulation that has been fervently denied up until last year. Many were also unaware that in 2014 the Navy publicly confirmed previous conjecture in regards to weather modification and the HAARP facility.

“…we’re moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere, which the HAARP was really designed to do, was to inject energy into the ionosphere, to be able to actually control it.”

Even after this statement, which was no doubt rationalized away by those unwilling to accept the reality currently slapping them across the face, the internet continued to be awash with “conspiracy theorist” slander and ridicule when discussing weather modification. Some have spoken out claiming that the statement released in the Pasadena Star newspaper, is only a notice to commence “cloud-seeding,” and that cloud-seeding is something that the government has been “open” about for a long time. First of all, open is not the word anyone would use to describe the U.S. government, and second, of course it is cloud-seeding, but most will adamantly deny that even could-seeding exists; laughing it off as yet another crazy conspiracy. Twenty years ago, those very same people would have arguing that cloud-seeding itself was a crazy conspiracy. The notice of intent in the Star read further:

Ground-based equipment will be used to disperse silver iodine particles into suitable storm clouds. Criteria have been developed for both initiating and suspending weather modification activities.”

The sad truth is that even following a blatant “Notice of Intent” to modify the weather, many are so well trained to ignore anything that goes against the mainstream narrative that they will justify and rationalize in whatever way they need, in order to make this fall in line, even with the statement coming from a small mainstream source. This is no doubt why it was released on page 11 of the Classifieds, so that those looking for a reason to discount its legitimacy will assume that, “if the government wanted to admit something like this they would have done it on the front page.”

Ultimately, the spraying of silver iodine into the atmosphere should not be okay with anyone, despite the name or label one wants to give this process in order to satisfy their fragile reality. According to the County of Santa Barbara’s Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS), silver iodine has the following Hazardous Identification:

Potential Acute Health Effects: Hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation.

Under Accidental Release Measures is states:

Be careful that the product is not present at a concentration level above TLV (threshold limit value). Check TLV on the MSDS and with local authorities.

And finally under Precautions:

Do not ingest. Do not breathe dust. Wear suitable protective clothing. In case of insufficient ventilation, wear suitable respiratory equipment. If ingested, seek medical advice immediately and show the container or the label. Avoid contact with skin and eyes.

When an idea has been thrown out that contradicts one’s carefully constructed reality, their lifelong inculcation of specific ideas and beliefs that support the mainstream narrative has taught them to shut down completely. Not a moments thought is given to the possibility that the idea might have some merit or factual representation, because if the idea was given its proper consideration and found to be correct, even slightly possible, their entire world is suspect. This scares the life out of the average mainstream believer.

While many here would insert the appropriate Orwellian reference, Aldous Huxley had a slightly different yet equally scary perception of the future. In his book Brave New World he suggested a future where citizens would be flooded with so much information that the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. It is not hard to see the logic in that thought process when one looks at the overwhelming amount of information, misinformation and outright lies perpetually circulating on the Internet. It becomes hard to know one’s own opinion when over saturated with constantly conflicting narratives. This produces a public that is no longer interested in activism or advocacy because it would appear to be ineffectual at best.

The sad but unfortunate truth is that the United States government has become the very thing this nation was founded to prevent. Despite the fact that the country wasn’t able to make it through five presidents before we began to see the cronyism and unilateral decisions that are rampant today, it is easy to see the virtue and justness within the founding ideals of the United States. History has shown us time and time again that human nature will always play its part in any position of power; man is inherently capable of both extreme good and evil. This was exactly the logic behind the second amendment, regardless of how many have attempted to dilute or distort its meaning with modern association. The American people have a right to defend their inalienable and self-evident rights against what the founding fathers saw as an inevitable eventuality: a tyrannical government. They knew that even men in that very room, had the potential to steer the nation in the direction we now face today.

What this nation is in dire need of is not a violent revolution, but a revolution of the mind. Americans need to begin to see the danger of current circumstances and the inevitability of history coming full circle. The history of the world if rife with leaders turning corrupt, people rising up to establish order, and repeat. This is due to the inherent qualities of any human being; we are all subject to greed, desire and ambition. All have skeletons in their closet; simply being elected to office does not somehow strip one of their human characteristics. Yet the people tend to cast these public officials is a light of morality by default, when our own nation’s history strongly shows otherwise.

The American people can no longer refuse to see the dangers at its feet that are quickly becoming perilous. To ignore the very real dangers of manipulating the ionosphere, and injecting it with potentially harmful materials, or to disregard that this type of government experimentation is happening at all, is very naive and irresponsible at best. But to ignore the fact that up until recently the entire subject was denied, and has now been nonchalantly admitted as if it was commonplace all along, is just reckless. What is important to the future of this country is that each individual personally decides to give equal consideration to all possibilities, despite any preconceived misconceptions that have been subtly cast out into American culture for decades.


Related Topics:

A Case of Weather Control!?

Paris Climate Change Conference shows Road to NWO Weather Control*

Geoengineering Climate Change*

Secretive U.N. Legal Conference Wants to Outlaw “Climate Change Denial”*

U.S. Places “Gag Order” on Weather Agency Employees, Inserts Geo-engineering Propaganda into ‘Common Core’ Syllabus*

The Norwegian Powerhouse Behind HAARP*

Did HAARP Cause Devastating Floods in Serbia and Bosnia*

HAARP Frequency Caught in Action

Evidence Proving California Drought Was Geo-engineered*

DynCorp Mercenaries Replace Blackwater Mercenaries in Yemen*

DynCorp Mercenaries Replace Blackwater Mercenaries in Yemen*

The deployment included special naval forces, which entered the port of Ras Omran southwest of Aden.

Khabar News Agency citing an official with Yemeni Defense Ministry said that the first batch of mercenaries from the private U.S. military firm DynCorp arrived today in the Yemeni city of Aden to replace Blackwater.

According to the news agency, under a USD-3-billion contract between the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and DynCorp, mercenaries from the company are to be deployed to Yemen, where UAE forces are fighting against the Yemeni army and Popular Committees on Saudi orders.

 “The first group of the mercenaries recently arrived in the port city of Aden to replace those of Blackwater, a notorious American group now renamed Academi,” the official told to Khabar news agency.

He also said that this deployment included special naval forces, which entered the port of Ras Omran southwest of Aden.

It is also reported that the Blackwater had decided to withdraw from Bab-el-Mandeb region after the Yemeni forces inflicted heavy losses on them. To tackle Yemeni forces, the UAE was forced to bring in the new mercenaries from DynCorp for the same reason.


Related Topics:

Barbarism and Aggression against Yemen Echoes of the 1930s*

Britain is arming Saudi Arabia in Yemen Conflict*

U.S.-Backed Coalition has Attacked 100 Hospitals in Yemen Since March*

U.S. Continues to Poison the People of Flint*

U.S. Continues to Poison the People of Flint*

By Yakov Andreev

As people continue to succumb to lead poisoning after one of the greatest mass poisonings in U.S. history, the government bickers over whether they should lift a finger to save lives.

The fight over who is responsible for Flint, Michigan, once a proud factory town and a former headquarters of American car manufacturing became a leaded wasteland continues to go on. Worse yet, the fight over whether to fix the problem has become a hot topic of debate with members of Congress stopping an aid package for the mostly ethnic-minority city.

It’s been five months since the state of Michigan switched Flint’s drinking water source to the Great Lakes after a lengthy and disastrous experiment using the Flint River to provide water to Flint’s roughly 100,000 residents that started in 2014.

Residents still can’t drink what comes out of their taps because none of the affected pipes have been fixed or replaced.

In the latest salvo over the crisis, Senator Mike Lee of Utah is holding up a federal funding package designed to address the issue of high lead levels found in Flint’s water. Lee argued in a statement on Friday that no federal aid is needed for what is effectively a state issue.

“The people and policymakers of Michigan right now have all the government resources they need to fix the problem,” Lee, a Republican, said.

“The only thing Congress is contributing to the Flint recovery is political grandstanding.”

Senators from both parties reached a tentative deal for a $220 million package to fix and replace lead-contaminated pipes in Flint and other cities. However, Lee has managed to stop it from going to a vote.

Dying by the Dozens

When Michigan changed the city’s water source to the Flint River, it did not treat the water which corroded the pipes, leaching lead and heavy metal into the water that went into the taps of residents’ homes. Lead-tainted water is known to stunt childhood development and impact nearly every part of the human body and is now being linked with a local outbreak of Legionnaires Disease. By the time the water was switched back, the pipes were already damaged so leaded water continues to pour out of taps in many parts of the area.

While people wait for action on the pipes, volunteers continue to truck bottled drinking water into the city, though the effort is not able to keep up anywhere near the demand. Additionally, residents are still forced to shower and clean their homes with brownish water.

Already at least 45 people been diagnosed to Legionnaires Disease believed to be caused by lead poisoning. Five have already died. An untold number of other households, especially with children, have also been impacted.

More than a dozen lawsuits have been filed on behalf of Flint residents who drank the lead-tainted water for nearly two years. Some of the suits seek to hold Michigan Governor Rick Snyder and others personally liable for the damages with some defendants facing criminal charges. Snyder has hired a criminal defence attorney retained to serve as “investigatory counsel.”

A new report suggests the overall cost for replacing the pipes and handling the lawsuits may exceed $300 billion.

Flint in the 2016 Race for President

Tomorrow night, the two remaining Democratic presidential hopefuls will participate in a debate in Flint where they are both expected to show empathy for the city’s citizens and blast Snyder, Michigan’s Republican governor.

During a speech following her Super Tuesday electoral success last week, Clinton took a shot at Snyder saying “our city’s children were poisoned by toxic water because their governor wanted to save a little money.”

Clinton also went on the airwaves to discuss the issue.

“The idea that you would have a community in the United States of America of nearly 100,000 people who were drinking and bathing in lead-contaminated water infuriates me,” she told a national radio program.

However, some questions have arisen over how much polluting and poisoning America’s water supply Clinton really is.

In 2005, then-Senator Clinton opposed bipartisan legislation to ban a chemical known as methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), an additive designed to make fuel burn cleaner. However, in the late 1990s, scientists began detecting an increasing amount of this potential carcinogen in groundwater supplies. Eventually, a federal study found that drinking water sources in as many as 31 states contained significant levels of MTBE contaminating drinking water supplies for more than 15 million Americans.

Seventeen states filed joint lawsuits against the major producers of the compound, including ExxonMobil which became a major Clinton Foundation donor. By 2005, 21 states banned the use of MTBE prompting Clinton’s Democratic colleague, Senator Pete Domenici, to file legislation to phase-out its use nationally.

Clinton joined 14 Republicans and 11 Democrats in voting against the measure though it ultimately passed the Senate. Critics justified their votes by saying it would encourage greater use of ethanol.

Whether Sanders brings this up in the debate is yet to be seen, as is whether the residents of Flint will ever get access to clean water.


Related Topics:

Legionnaires’ Disease Spikes in Flint amid Poisoned Water Crisis*

Matt Damon Calls on Governor Snyder to Resign Over Flint Water Crisis*

Flint State Employees Were Given Clean Water a Year Ago*

Black Entertainers Raise over $100,000 in #JusticeForFlint, an Oscars Alternative*

EPA Head in Charge of Flint Resigns as Obama Pledges $80mn for Poisoned Water Crisis*