NATO Violates Pledge to ‘Not Station Permanent Combat Troops’ in E. Europe*

NATO Violates Pledge to ‘Not Station Permanent Combat Troops’ in E. Europe*

As NATO continues its largest military buildup in Eastern Europe since the end of the 20th century, international affairs and security analyst Mark Sleboda discusses the West’s fueling of a new Cold War.

“Four thousand troops is not a military threat to Russia in any way, shape or form,” Sleboda says, describing NATO’s plan to deploy four new battalions to the Baltics and Poland.

“What these [deployments] are is, these are tripwires. They are intended that if, for some suicidal reason, Russia did decide to invade the Baltics, that they would immediately be forced to kill NATO troops and then NATO would be forced to respond. Effectively these are human shields being placed in the Baltics.”

“But since Russia has no intention or desire for the Baltics or Poland, it is unlikely that these will be used.”

The placement of military units along Russia’s borders cannot be seen by Moscow and the rest of the world as anything other than a provocation.

“What Russia finds incredibly offensive about this is, we’re looking at U.S. and German troops deployed on its border for the first time,” Sleboda says.

“This is an amassing of troops, however small, for the first time since World War II, directly on Russia’s border.”

Beyond simple provocation though, the deployments are in violation of the NATO-Russia Founding Act.

“It was agreed to in 1997. It was an original agreement between NATO and Russia that would then become the NATO-Russia Council, and so on. For our purposes, the primary importance of this document was NATO promised not to station combat troops, permanently, in its eastern member states,” Sleboda says.

The justification for this build-up is based on debunked claims of Russia’s involvement in Eastern Ukraine.

“Never mind, of course, that NATO countries were involved in backing a coup…Ukraine that is now committing a civil war, bombing its own cities and people to try and get them to submit to the new regime in Kiev,” he says.

“But that is the way NATO frames it, as Russian aggression.”

Another factor in the build-up is the profits that go toward Western defence companies.

“This is extremely profitable, especially for American defence firms and America’s push to get NATO countries to use their military industrial complex,” Sleboda says.

“Their equipment, their producers.”


Related Topics:

G7 Boldly Displays its Lies Regarding anti-Russia Sanctions*

U.S. and U.N. Power Hand-Over or Hostile Take-over*

German Intelligence Service to Become Branch of U.S. CIA*

Did the West Fake an Entire Attack on their al-Qaeda for an Oil Pipeline?