Archive | August 22, 2016

U.S. Commander Threatens Russia and Syria*

U.S. Commander Threatens Russia and Syria*

In a telephone interview from Baghdad, new Iraq-Syria War Commander Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend tried to echo the boundless optimism of every other U.S. commander when put in charge of one of the nation’s various open-ended wars, vowing to see all of ISIS dead, and virtually ousted from both countries within a year.

The real story of his comments, however, was less the war he’s fighting now than the wars he’s threatening to fight along the way, as Lt. Gen. Townsend pointedly threatened both Russia and Syria over recent flights and airstrikes around the north-eastern city of Hasakeh.

Townsend said he’d “informed” the Russians that U.S. warplanes are prepared to defend U.S. troops on the ground if they feel threatened in future strikes in and around Hasakeh. U.S. troops are known to be embedded with Kurdish forces in the Hasakeh Province, but their exact locations aren’t known.

Even so, when fighting broke out in the city between Syrian and Kurdish forces, and Syrian warplanes struck the Kurds, U.S. officials complained they’d had to scramble troops out of the area. They also made a point of sending their own warplanes to “confront” the Syrian ones.

Syrian warplanes are still flying over the area, despite U.S. threats, while Russia is trying to get the military and the Kurds to stop fighting one another. Russia has been hacking the Kurds in some offensives, and appears to see this fighting as an unwelcome distraction from their focus on ISIS and the Nusra Front.

U.S. officials, on the other hand, seem to see this as a great opportunity to transition from the war against ISIS, which despite all their rhetoric isn’t accomplishing much, and into a war against Syria’s government, which they see as a more straightforward, and potentially more winnable, battle.

U.S. intelligence officials have been arguing that point since last year, and State Department officials have also been pushing the idea of shifting the war to one of regime change, on the idea that the pro-U.S. rebels are never going to get anywhere unless the U.S. props them up as a government first.

That said, attacking Syrian warplanes over Syria is almost certain to quickly bring the Russians into the war as well, which is why it has in practice been unthinkable to do so. Despite that obvious problem looming just over the horizon, however, U.S. officials are still eagerly rushing forward on a confrontation.


Related Topics:

Pentagon Accuse Syrian Air Force of being “Foreign Military Aircraft” in Syria*

China’s Upgrading Ties with Syria*

Funded by U.S. Latest ‘iconic image’ designed to Demonize Russia and to Keep Syrian Blood Flowing*

Greater Israel and the Tale of Two Temples*

What we saw in Syria goes against everything we read in the United States*

U.S.-based Forces Gave Hundreds of ISIS Terrorists Safe Passage out of Syria*

70% of ISIS Recruits Don’t Even Know What Islam Is*

U.S. Central Command Intelligence Reports Hid Poor Progress against ISIS in Iraq and Syria*

The Strange Death of Dr. Sebi the Man Who Cures AIDS, Cancer, Diabetes

The Strange Death of Dr. Sebi the Man Who Cures AIDS, Cancer, Diabetes

Meet Dr. Sebi, a pathologist, biochemist and herbalist who died 06th August while imprisoned in Honduras. He was 82 years old.

The Man who Beat the FDA because he really could cure all those diseases…

My life with Dr. Sebi 

Related Topics:

One Holistic Doctor the Feds Tried to Prevent Practising and Failed*

11th Holistic Doctor Found Dead in the Woods*

Murdered Holistic Doctors Discovered Autism/Cancer-Causing Enzyme Intentionally Being Added to All Vaccines*

The Doctor Who Prescribes Fruit and Veg. Instead of Drugs*

AMA Threatens Outspoken Holistic Doctors*

Thirty Holistic Doctors/Practitioners Poisoned At Conference*

Western Medicine Is Rockefeller Medicine*

Neuroscientist Shows Fasting Bolsters Your Brain, but Big Pharma Won’t Study It*

Big Pharma Assassinations and New Toxin Found in Vaccine*

FDA Seeks to Ban Some Supplements from Pharmacy Compounding*

U.S. Threaten Continued Violence if Colombia Challenges Big Pharma Monopoly*

From Doctor to Terrorist – What happens when you don’t play ball with Big-Pharma*

Prophet Muhammad Said It, Now Top Doctors are Saying It*

Cupping at the Olympics – what is it and why do athletes use it?*

U.K.’s Home Office backed Secret Drug Trials on ‘irritable and restless’ Children*

U.K.’s Home Office backed Secret Drug Trials on ‘irritable and restless’ Children*

Home Office employees approved plans to carry out experimental drug trials on children at two schools for disruptive teenagers in the 1960s, newly-declassified documents reveal.

Government psychiatrists gave the green light to testing new behaviour-modifying drugs on boys at Richmond Hill Approved School in North Yorkshire and girls at Springhead Park Approved School in Rothwell, near Leeds.

The boys aged 15 and above, were given an anticonvulsant drug in a bid to control their behaviour.

But plans for drug trials at Springhead Park were shelved after the headmistress and school managers rejected them.

Approved Schools were used to house disruptive minors and were at a level between a children’s home and a Borstal – a notorious youth detention centre abolished in the U.K.

Children in these schools were sent there by juvenile courts, but they weren’t imprisoned.

According to BBC Radio 4, newly-released files at the National Archives show how Home Office psychiatrist Dr. Pamela Mason backed plans to test drugs on boys at Richmond Hill.

The trial went ahead after Dr. JR Hawkings, a psychiatrist attached to the school, wrote to the Home Office asking for permission to carry out the tests on boys who were “impulsive, explosive, irritable, restless and aggressive.”

As part of the trial, a group of boys were given Beclamide, an anticonvulsant which was prescribed for epilepsy and is no longer in common use.

Another group was given a placebo as part of the ‘double blind’ experiment.

According to the BBC, there is no evidence that parents of the children or the boys themselves were consulted about the trial, which went ahead in 1968 and lasted for six months.

The outcome of the tests is unknown, as there is no record in official documents or medical journals.

A similar plan to give girls aged 14 and 15 a powerful sedative called Haloperidol, now mostly used as an anti-psychotic, was dropped after Springhead Park Headmistress Shelagh Sunner opposed the plan.

They weren’t mentally sick kids” Sunner told the BBC.

They needed to work through their emotions.


Related Topics:

The U.S. has Mandated Drug Research on Children*

Australia Pre-Drugging Kids and Psychosis Risk Syndrome*

Study Finds Antipsychotic Drugs Shrinks the Brain*

Psychiatric Drugs Are Being Prescribed to Infants*

Being Driven Insane!

Nixon Advisor Admitted War on Drugs Invented to Crush Anti-War and Black Movements*

Post-Ebola Syndrome or Fluoroquinolone Poisoning?*

More Teens Dying from Prescribed Drugs than Illegal Drugs*

‘She went on to Prove Psychiatry Wrong and became a U.N. Advisor*

Soros’ Money behind the Transgender Agenda*

Soros’ Money behind the Transgender Agenda*

By Kelly Riddell

Three years ago, a Supreme Court ruling paved the way for gay marriage.

After it, the mainstream media had one question: What was next for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender movement? They had, after all, won the big fight. In addition, many corporations had adopted policies barring discrimination based on sexual orientation, and two of America’s most watched shows at the time “Modern Family” and “Glee” featured openly gay characters.

“I really do believe [the Supreme Court ruling] is the domino that is going to tip over the rest of the dominoes,” Wilson Cruz, an LGBT activist, told CNN at the time.

“Do not get in the way of this train, because it will run you over.”

To ensure things ran full-steam ahead, billionaire George Soros, through his Foundation to Promote Open Society, dedicated at least $2.7 million to the cause that year, according to his tax returns.

Some Republicans at the time mistakenly thought the LGBT movement had reached its pinnacle, that the culture wars had ended. They thought the party could now focus on fiscal concerns, which weren’t nearly as divisive.

But that was foolish — the LGBT movement was just getting fired up, and Soros-affiliated groups were already plotting their next prize.

It took two-plus years, but seemingly out of nowhere to many conservatives, the transgender bathroom debate exploded this summer after North Carolina legislators passed a bill that required people to use bathrooms matching their sex assigned at birth. The Justice Department intervened, calling such a law a violation of the Civil Rights Act, and the media went wild — it was their new civil rights movement.

It was a debate that had been percolating at the state level for years.

So what made North Carolina the tipping point? Well-funded LGBT organizers had success in California, giving them a blueprint to work in other states, and it’s an election year. North Carolina is a battleground state with presidential implications, and liberals love fighting the cultural wars. It was President Obama who lit the match, after all.

The bathroom debate started in California, where the Gay Straight Alliance Network, an organization based in Oakland, has been lobbying hard for transgender rights. The group is a “next-generation LGBTQ racial and gender justice organization that empowers … allied youth leaders to advocate, organize, and mobilize an intersectional movement,” according to its website.

They’ve created Gay Straight Alliance (GSA) clubs in more than 61% of California schools and have advocated for and achieved 11 pro-LGBT laws in the state, including a 2013 bill that allowed students to join sports teams and use the bathroom of their gender preference.

The GSA helped organize groups in North Carolina.

They helped craft LGBT curriculum in accordance with the University of North Carolina’s LEARN NC program to teach and talk about the issue. They helped create an action guide that gave LGBT activists a blueprint for lobbying, including what hashtags to use on social media, and how to file complaints with the U.S. Office for Civil Rights.

In 2013, Mr. Soros‘ gave GSA $100,000.

The Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Center also received $130,000 from Mr. Soros that year. Their Leadership Lab was published in the journal Science this spring, that evaluated the impact that door-to-door canvassing can have on reducing transphobia. It’s being used as national model.

The Leadership Lab writes the study has “been able to independently quantify the impact we’re making on voters: The same decrease in homophobia that took fourteen years of incremental change to occur in the past is occurring here, in terms of voters’ transphobia, over the course of a single short conversation with a Lab canvasser. What’s more, their study shows that this approach is beginning to counter the heinous ‘bathroom myth’ that our opposition has spread to scare voters into voting against the trans community in election after election.”

The Global Action for Trans Equality (GATE), headquartered in New York, received $244,000 from Mr. Soros. It’s main purpose is to pull all the LGBT organizations together in order to create a louder megaphone, laying out best practices and fundraising advice.

So what’s next for the movement?

Mr. Soros‘ IRS Form 990 gives us some clues.

He’s funded a Streetwise and Safe organization in New York, with the purpose of supporting a “national project focused on increasing safety for LGBTQ youth during interactions with law enforcement and developing advocacy skills to engage debates around discriminatory policing practices,” according to his 2014 tax return.

Mr. Soros also gave $525,000 to Justice at Stake, a group that’s looking to promote diversity in the courts for people within the LGBT community.

“This lack of diversity on the bench can lead to the appearance of bias, and even actual bias,” the group’s website warns. “A more diverse bench improves the quality of justice for all citizens.”

You see, winning court rulings is not enough, you need to control the courts in order for them to be fair.

Once that’s achieved? I’m sure there will be more demands.


Related Topics:

How the Left has taken Down the Family, Marriage, and the Nation*

100,000 Panamanians march against UN-NWO Sex Education*

Mother Pulls Children Out of School After it Introduced ‘Transgender Awareness Program’*

School Stops Enforcing Obama’s trans Bathroom Policy after Parents Pulled Kids Out*

Father and Boyfriend Charged with ‘raping 10-month-old baby daughter’ for 3 Hours *

Court Orders Child Abuse, Dad must Treat his 11-year-old Daughter as a Boy*

Syphilis Pandemic Rises 163% in U.K.*

Surprise – STD Rates among U.S. Homosexuals ‘alarming,’*

Obama Spent $700 Million Promoting Homosexuality Overseas*

Gay Activist Admits our Goal is to Indoctrinate Children*

Bishops Denounce Horrific Desecration of Christian Images in ‘Gay Pride’*

National Education Association Long Campaign for Gay ‘Marriage’*

Foundations Pouring Millions Into Eradicate Religious Exemptions on Gay ‘Marriage’*

Gays Who Reject the Illuminati Agenda*

Greek Bishop Refers to the Nature of international Jewry’s Subversive, anti-Christian, anti-White, pro-Gay Agenda*

Clinton Emails So Dangerous, Congress Does Not Have Clearance

Clinton Emails So Dangerous, Congress Does Not Have Clearance

From Alexandra Bruce

The United States has been  kidnapped by the National Security Act, as shown so well, in this interaction between Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and Charles McCullough, Intelligence Community Inspector General (ODNI OIG), during a hearing of the United States House Committee on Oversight and Government regarding the High Security nature of Hillary Clinton’s emails.

When asked by Rep. Chaffetz which intelligence agency is in possession of the “hot” emails, McCullough responds that those who have “ownership” of them will not release any information about them, as they are characterized as “ORCAN” (Originator Controlled).

Furthermore, McCullough cannot say which actual agency is in possession of these emails, “In an open hearing.”Chaffetz grins at the ludicrousness of this situation, commenting,

“So, you can’t even mention which agency won’t allow us, as member of Congress to see something that Hillary Clinton allowed someone without a security clearance, in a non-protected format to see!

“When pressed further for the general reasons as to why this information is so protected, McCullough replies, “We shouldn’t get into the content of these emails in an open hearing.”

Chaffetz backs down and says, “I don’t want to violate that but the concern is that it’s already been violated by Hillary Clinton – and it was her choice, she set it up and she created this problem and she created this mess and we shouldn’t have to go through this – but she did that.”

McCullough responds: “This is the segment of emails that I had to have people in my office read into particular programs to even see these emails. We didn’t possess the required clearances and compartments -”

“So, even the Inspector General of ODNI didn’t have the requisite security clearances?” asks Chaffetz.

“That’s correct,” replies McCullough.

Chaffetz reacts,”Wow. Wow, wow, wow.”

The YouTube creator of this clip believes that ODNI McCullough should technically have the right to view all artefacts deriving from the U.S. intelligence community and she speculates as to whether or not the “owner” of this intercepted cache of emails might not be the U.N. (a thought which would never cross my mind).

Personally, I just think that the Deep State has no respect for the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. He is the window-dressing or the façade of accountability in the U.S. government, which is essentially non-existent.


Related Topics:

FBI Leak: Hillary Clinton Foundation Guilty of Treason*

Assassination of Top U.S. Democratic Party Official Leads to FBI Capture of Clinton “Hit Team”*

IRS Launches Investigation of Clinton Foundation*

Julian Assange Slams “Corrupt” Hillary Clinton Following WikiLeaks DNC Email Release

DNC Collapsing Amid Resignations in WikiLeaks Aftermath*

#DemExit Threatens To Fracture DNC – Media Told Not To Cover Movement*

Clinton Body Count in Six Weeks*

Soros gave Clinton step-by-step Instructions on how to Tackle Albania Unrest*

Man Who Leaked Clinton’s Medical Records Found Dead*

Developed in Iraq, Deployed at the DNC?: Cell-Jamming Technology is Being Turned on Journalists*

FBI Now Investigating Clinton Foundation Despite DoJ Objections*

Panic Grips Self-Inflicted U.S. NSA Shuts-down as Russia as all Clinton Phone-calls*

Julian Assange’s Lawyer Killed by a Train*

Do Women Who Surround Themselves With Nature Live Longer?

Do Women Who Surround Themselves With Nature Live Longer?

By Amanda Froelich

Researchers have already confirmed that spending time in nature reduces stress and that living near trees is beneficial for your health and wallet. Now, a new study concludes that women who surround themselves with vegetation are likely to live longer lives.

The study, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, was conducted by researchers from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Data from 108,630 women enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study across the U.S. between the years of 2000 and 2008 helped the researchers determine if living near vegetation affects a woman’s health.

The team relied on satellite imagery from different seasons and various years to calculate the amount of greenery present at each woman’s home.

Researchers discovered that women who lived in the greenest surroundings had a 12% lower overall mortality rate versus those living in areas with the least green vegetation. Interestingly, women living in areas with the most vegetation had a 34% lower rate of respiratory-related deaths and a 13% lower rate of cancer deaths compared to those who had the least vegetation around their homes.

This is likely because females who live in less-populated locations and are surrounded by more greenery are less exposed to environmental pollutants which are prevalent in city locations. In addition, it is possible that the stress caused by city noise and extreme heat could contribute to a woman’s early demise. The researchers theorize that areas with more vegetation also offer increased opportunities for physical activity and society interaction. Not only does regular exercise improve longevity, it’s a great aid for relieving stress.

Peter James, a research associate in the Harvard Chan School Department of Epidemiology, commented on the findings:

“We were surprised to observe such strong associations between increased exposure to greenness and lower mortality rates. We were even more surprised to find evidence that a large proportion of the benefit from high levels of vegetation seems to be connected with improved mental health.”

Once again, science has confirmed what many have long suspected to be true: that spending time in nature isn’t only relaxing, it’s essential for living a long, healthy life.


Related Topics:

Nature Helps Our Brain Connect!

Modern Lifestyles, Thought and the Nature of Alzheimer

Earth Magnetism and the Human Body

Forcing Nature to Co-exist with Pharmaceuticals

Nature Doesn’t Need People

Schooled in Nature: There’s a way to Teach Children Without Colonizing Their Minds*

White American Women Are Dying Prematurely*