Archive | October 2, 2016

Abortion Survivor to Congress – ‘I was Born Alive after Being Burned in My Mother’s Womb’*

Abortion Survivor to Congress – ‘I was Born Alive after Being Burned in My Mother’s Womb’*

An abortion survivor urged Americans to “wake up” to the reality that some babies born alive after an attempted abortion are left to die, the survivor testified at a hearing on Capitol Hill last week.

“Many Americans have no idea that babies can even live through abortions and are often left to die, but this does happen,” Gianna Jessen, 39, said at the hearing.

“I know this, because I was born alive in an abortion clinic after being burned in my mother’s womb for 18 hours.”

Jessen, who has cerebral palsy due to her attempted abortion, added at a House Judiciary Constitution and Civil Justice Subcommittee hearing on Sept. 23:

“My medical records clearly state the following: Born during saline abortion … Apart from Jesus himself, the only reason I am alive is the fact that the abortionist had not yet arrived at work that morning. Had he been there, he would have ended my life by strangulation, suffocation, or simply leaving me there to die”.

“Often when I’m in the midst of abortion advocates, they never can answer this one question and it is this: If abortion is merely about women’s rights, then what were mine?” Jessen said.

In 2002, President George W. Bush signed the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, making it illegal to kill any babies born alive.

“Unfortunately, incidents involving born-alive children being killed after an attempted abortion have continued after this law [was passed] and into the present,” Arina Grossu, director for the Center of Human Dignity at the Family Research Council, testified at the hearing. Grossu’s written testimony says:

Abortionist Kermit Gosnell operated his dirty and dangerous Philadelphia abortion business and committed horrendous crimes in Philadelphia for over three decades. … His heinous and murderous practices of snipping the spines of born-alive children were only discovered by accident when federal and state authorities raided his facility in 2010, not because he was illegally killing born-alive infants, but because of his illegal prescription drug activity.

Grossu says Gosnell is “not an outlier.”

“Not one person to date has been charged or convicted under the current federal [Born-Alive Infants Protection Act] law,” Grossu testified.

The House passed the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, introduced by Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., in September 2015. An identical bill in the Senate, introduced by Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., was referred to the Judiciary Committee.

“The abortion industry has laboured for all of these decades to convince the world that unborn children and born children should be completely separated in our minds, that while born children are persons worthy of protection, unborn children are not persons and are not worthy of protection,” Franks, chairman of the subcommittee, said at the hearing.

Franks’ legislation would protect the rights of infants born alive after an abortion and leave criminal consequences for health care professionals who violate the law. The legislation would also require proper medical care be given by the health care practitioner present when an infant is born alive.

The legislation “explicitly requires health care practitioners to treat born-alive abortion survivors with the same care they would treat any other born-alive baby and admit such babies immediately to a hospital.” The law would also hold abortionists accountable for killing born-alive infants, Grossu testified.

President Barack Obama’s administration “strongly opposes” the passage of this bill, according to a statement from September 2015.

“The White House has promised that it would veto the born-alive legislation, citing it would have a ‘chilling’ effect,” Grossu testified.

“I cannot think of a more chilling effect than continuing to let U.S. abortionists commit infanticide.”

Grossu urged support for the legislation to stop infanticide, or intentionally killing an infant child, in the United States.

The Hyde Amendment, also under examination at the hearing, prohibits the use of certain taxpayer dollars in abortion cases, except in rape, incest, or to save the mother’s life.

“Today we will hear testimony on existing statutory language prohibiting taxpayer funding from paying for the taking of the lives of preborn children through abortion,” Franks said.

“There is concern that the Obama administration or a potential Clinton administration may intend to reinterpret the plain and longstanding meaning of the Hyde Amendment.”

The Hyde Amendment, an appropriations policy rider that has been passed each year since 1976, has its 40th anniversary this week.

“As a black woman, I am outraged that the morally bankrupt Hyde Amendment has been permitted to persist for so long,” Kierra Johnson, executive director of Unite for Reproductive and Gender Equity, testified.

“It is a source of pain for many women and should be a source of shame for those who support it.”

“The Hyde Amendment prevents women from even being able to make a decision about their health care,” Johnson said.

While Genevieve Plaster, a senior policy analyst at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, a pro-life non-profit organization, testified that the Hyde Amendment has saved over 2 million lives since 1976, or approximately 60,000 lives per year.

“America was founded on the concept that our rights come from God,” Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, said at the hearing.

When our rights come from God, how would it be possible that those rights would confer a right to kill a baby?”


Related Topics:

Guilty of Selling Aborted Baby Tissue for $25,000 Beauty Treatment*

U.N. – NWO’s Ordered Allow Homosexuality and Abortion or Forget Aid*

WHO Tells Governments they must Provide Abortion and Sex Change*

Planned Parenthood Selling Aborted Foetus’*

Top Scientists Tell Russia Foetus is Human. Ban Abortion.*

US Senate to Maintain Funding for Overseas Abortion, Population Reduction*

Aborted Baby’s Heart was Beating as the Brain was Harvested*

Legislation Passes to Protect Babies Who Survive Abortion *

First Abortion in Colombia as a Result of Zika*

U.N. Rules That Abortion is a Human Right*

Poland Debates Banning Abortion After Live Baby Cries Itself to Death*

African Woman Schools U.N. Delegate on Why Pushing Abortion is ‘neo-colonialism’*

‘This baby won’t stop breathing!’: Abortionist Strangled Baby Born Alive While Nurses Stood and Watched*

Mississippi Signs Ban on Abortions that Rip Babies ‘limb from limb’*

Obama Just Protected Planned Parenthood Funding Permanently*

In ‘Global War against Marriage and Family’ Pope Francis Denounces Gender Theory*

In ‘Global War against Marriage and Family’ Pope Francis Denounces Gender Theory*

In the age of “ideological colonization” where gender theory has become a key part of a “global war” on marriage and family, the Pope defended the traditional union between a woman and a man as “the most beautiful thing God created.”

Responding to one woman in the audience in Tbilisi, who asked about gender theory being taught in schools, the Pope said:

“You mentioned a great enemy of marriage today: gender theory.”

“Today, there is a global war out to destroy marriage,” Francis said in Georgia.

“Not with weapons but with ideas … we have to defend ourselves from ideological colonization.”

A basic tenet of gender theory is that the concepts of male and female are social constructs, allowing a person to identify themselves as either, both or neither irregardless of biological sex.

NWO Family
In his off-the-cuff speech to the Catholic community where the Pope heard concerns of the locals, Francis reminded his followers about the sanctity of marriage.

“Matrimony is the most beautiful thing God created,” because men and women were created in God’s image, explaining that it is “when the two become one that his image is reflected.”

In August, the head of the Catholic Church, also used the opportunity to speak out against gender theory, also referring to “ideological colonization” when the approach is taught in schools. Francis’s summer remarks in Poland to a group of bishops also stressed that the idea is supported and funded by “very influential countries.”


Related Topics:

War on Faith and Family Continues

Gender Equity in Islam

U.K: To Become a Genderless, Parentless Society

Family that Homeschooled their Children Harassed from Germany to France, the US and Back Again*

British Family Courts Why the Secrecy?

‘Third Gender’ Official in Germany from November

French Muslims Join the protest against the Deceptive Gender Equality School Campaign*

JUDGE SLAMS Haringey Council over most shocking case ever – but family is destroyed anyhow

British Family Courts: Protecting Children from the Baby Snatchers*

Cultural Marxism in Action: Special Needs Sisters Taken from Homeschooling Family*

The American Family Being Forced Into Extinction*

African Bishops against the Vatican Move to Destroy the Family*

Thousands Rally in Rome to defend Natural Family and against Gender Theory*

Mexico’s Cardinal Sandoval Referred to the NWO Intent to Destroy the Family*

Battle On To Keep Ambiguous Language about Family Out of Major UN Agreement*

U.S. and E.U. Block the Family from new U.N. Development Goals*

Jewish Sexology and the Assault on Gender and the Family*

Woman Raised by Lesbians Testifies Gay Marriage Top of the List of Bad Marriages*

Traditional Marriage in D.C. has become a March*

American College of Paediatricians Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage was a ‘A Tragic Day for America’s Children’*

Tens of Thousands in Mexico Protest Gay ‘marriage’ Decision*

Foundations Pouring Millions Into Eradicate Religious Exemptions on Gay ‘Marriage’*

180,000 Italians Say No to Gender Theory and Sex Education*

Raised by Transgendered Parent, but against Transgendered Adoption*

Thousands Rally in Rome to defend Natural Family and against Gender Theory*

The Trouble with Changing your Gender*

U.K. Police Target Schoolchildren as Young as 4 with Tax Payer Funded, Transgender Propaganda*

Parents Thwart Transgender Bathroom Ruling in New York School District*

This Month the U.N. Launches a Blueprint for NWO with the Help of the Pope*

Pope Francis Faces a Backlash from Cardinals*

Mother Pulls Children Out of School After it Introduced ‘Transgender Awareness Program’*

Michigan Education Board Secretly Keeping Parents Out of Gender Decisions for Children*

U.K. Children as young as 4 being asked their Gender Option other than Male or Female*

Soros’ Money behind the Transgender Agenda*

Victory for Traditional Marriage in Alabama*

How the Left has taken Down the Family, Marriage, and the Nation*

Federal Court Overturns Ruling Upholding Natural Marriage in Puerto Rico, Orders Judge off Case*

The ‘Family’ Loses in the Latest U.N. Agreement*

I’m Raising My Son as a Boy*

ADL gets a Visit from White and Black Lives Matter Activists*

ADL gets a Visit from White and Black Lives Matter Activists*

A small group of White Lives Matter activists protested outside of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) office in southwest Houston on Saturday where they were met by Black Lives Matter counter-protesters and a heavy police presence.

Holding placards and signs while shouting “White Lives Matter!” the group gathered in front of the Jewish non-governmental organization after ADL allegedly accused the activists of being racist.

“They labelled us a hate group, they didn’t label the Black Lives Matter a hate group. That’s why we are here today, to protest the Anti-Defamation League,” Scott Lacy told local CBS affiliate KHOU news.

Meanwhile, counter-protesters from the Black Lives Matter movement also gathered outside the ADL, a group that is known for its work against anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry.

“Honestly, we just came here to drown them out, protesting and counter protesting is a show of force, showing who can outlast who, when one side is spewing hate, the other side is showing love to each other,” Ashton Woods, from the Black Lives Matter camp told KHOU.

Police had to use metal barricades to keep the two groups separate as tensions ran high at two opposing rallies, and things became personal.

John E. Rebel, from the White Lives Matter group, told Ruptly that “they’re calling Black Lives Matter a civil rights group while they target random white people for acts of violence at their rallies, while they burn cities down and loot, and kill police officers … it’s a garbage argument. Black-on-white crime is way larger in this country than white-on-black crime. But you only hear about white-on-black crime from these people here and from the mainstream medias.”

Saprina, a counter-protester from the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, said, “these people only have to antagonize us. They’re not here because they believe white lives matter, they know they’ve always mattered.”

At one point a Black Lives Matter protester jumped the barrier to attack the White Lives Matter area but Houston police quickly defused the situation. No arrests were made.

“It is a little bit loud, it is a little bit heated, but we are here to keep the peace, let everyone exercise their first amendment rights,” said Asst. Chief George Buenik with the Houston Police Department.


Related Topics:

U.S. Jewish Council Mad After Black Lives Matter Tell the Truth on Palestine*

Jewish Anti-Occupation Activists Stand With Black Lives Matter*

Faceoff between New Black Panthers and Armed anti-Muslim Trouble-Makers*

Black Lives Matter Fighting Alongside Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters*

#Arabs4BlackPower Releases Movement for Black Lives Solidarity Statement*

Neighbourhood Comes Together to Remove Racist Graffiti from Black Family’s Home*

Why were the Black Lives Matter protesters at London City Airport all White?*

Nixon Advisor Admitted War on Drugs Invented to Crush Anti-War and Black Movements*

Five Times Western Media Failed to Call White Shooters Terrorists*

Middle-aged White Men Like Me Have no Right to Tell Women not to Wear the Burkini*

Dear White People – an Open Letter*

Native American Council offers Amnesty to 220 million Undocumented Whites*

White Privilege Gets No Prison Time for Raping 2-Year-Old Girl and Posting It Online*

White Woman Uses Her Privilege in Dramatic Showdown*

Zionists Behind White Dispossession*

White American Women Are Dying Prematurely*

Progressive Professor Urges White Male Students to Commit Suicide During Class

Israel Settles Compensation to Turkey over Marmara Flotilla*

Israel Settles Compensation to Turkey over Marmara Flotilla*

By Elad Benari

Israel on Friday paid $20 million in compensation to Turkey for the Mavi Marmara flotilla incident in 2010, which led to the suspension of diplomatic ties between the two countries, the Turkish Hurriyet newspaper reported, citing CNN Turk.

The amount was paid to the bank account of the Turkish Justice Ministry, the broadcaster said.

Paying compensation to the families of the 10 Turkish Islamists who were killed during the raid on the Mavi Marmara was part of the reconciliation agreement recently signed between Turkey and Israel.

The agreement also provides for normalization of relations, the removal of sanctions the countries have imposed on one another, an increase in the level of diplomatic relations and an exchange of ambassadors.

After months of talks, the agreement was simultaneously announced by the Turkish and Israeli prime ministers in separate press conferences in Ankara and Rome on June 27 and signed by high-level Foreign Ministry officials from both countries one day later.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan added his signature to the reconciliation agreement signed between the two countries earlier this month.

Meanwhile, a senior Turkish official said on Friday that Ankara could announce the name of the ambassador to be appointed to Israel in “one week or 10 days”, according to the Hurriyet.

Turkey and Israel would simultaneously announce the appointment of ambassadors, said the official.


Related Topics:

Turkey Okays approval of Israel’s status in NATO: Report*

Israeli Geneticist: Ashkenazi Jews come from Turkey, not Palestine*

Israel is the Organ Harvesting and Human Trafficking Global Ringleader, with Help from U.S. and Turkey*

Corporate Media Silent on M.E. on Israel and Turkey Strike on Syrian Oil Deal*

Israel Ordered to Pay Iran $1.1 Billion*

Israel Ordered to Pay Iran $1.2bn*

U.S. Legalizes Lethal Weapon Deliveries to Ukraine*

U.S. Legalizes Lethal Weapon Deliveries to Ukraine*

Last week, the U.S. Congress approved the Stability and Democracy for Ukraine Act, or “STAND for Ukraine.” As the Ukrainian Embassy in the U.S. has reported, American congressmen unanimously supported the bill.

The bill’s list of ‘means for supporting democracy’ in Ukraine includes the supply of lethal defensive weapons systems. The legislation will come into force following a vote in the Senate and its signing by the U.S. President. From that point on, Washington will be able to officially supply lethal weapons to Ukraine.

The act’s adoption was an expected development. After all, it is well known that a Ukrainian lobby effectively works in the U.S. and throughout the West. During his visit to New York, Poroshenko met with representatives of the Ukrainian Diaspora who have had strong positions in American political circles since the end of the Second World War.

As a point of comparison, the numerous Russian Diaspora in the U.S. and its organizations, and in particular the Congress of Russian Americans, is nowhere close to matching the efficiency of Ukrainian circles’ lobbying activism. The fault for this, in my opinion, can be assigned to both sides, both Russian Americans themselves and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia and other government agencies and non-governmental organizations.

It is also important to recognize that numerous Western politicians and economists were included in Ukraine’s administrative organs, all the way up to the ministry level, following the coup d’etat in Kiev. The Ukrainian president’s aides and advisors have proven their effectiveness.

One of them is the former Secretary General of NATO, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who has the status of a freelance advisor. Rasmussen previously stated that NATO should provide Ukraine with lethal weapons if Russia does not fulfil the Minsk Agreements and continues to “destabilize Eastern Ukraine.” Rasmussen’s statement was a manifestation of Ukraine’s lobbying efforts and organizations in Western countries just as much as it is an element of the West’s overall information policy, the goal of which is convincing Western political circles and public opinion that Russia is a party to the conflict in Donbass and threatens Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

As can be seen in the U.S Congress’ resolution, this is yet another success. Poroshenko can be satisfied with at least this part of his trip to New York.

But the experience of American support for “democracy” around the world attests to the fact that the U.S. Congress is in fact promising new bloodshed and destruction for the people of Ukraine and Donbass. Ukrainians have never been good strategists, and this obvious truth has never benefitted the majority. One only needs to look at the experience of former Yugoslavia or that of Libya and Syria to be assured that America’s “benevolence” towards the people of Ukraine will only lead to the further division of the country and new victims. The U.S. is not interested in a strong Ukraine, but in deterring Russia at any cost. For them, Ukrainians are but expendable material, just like the people of Donbass.

But what is most interesting for me personally in the U.S. Congress’ resolution is another aspect which somehow found itself on the periphery of the Russian foreign ministry’s attention. Although lethal weapons were illegally delivered earlier, as many Donbass militiamen and even Ukrainian soldiers have exposed, the official green light to supply Ukraine with lethal weapons in fact makes the U.S. a party in the armed conflict in the former Ukraine.

Earlier, the U.S. State Department’s participation in the events of the Euromaidan legitimized the coup d’etat and gave a powerful impetus to the ensuing civil war. The burden of responsibility for the coup and the beginning of the civil war, however, must also be put on France, Germany, and Poland, whose foreign ministers signed on February 21st, 2014 the Agreement on Settling the Political Crisis in Ukraine. In so doing, these countries of “united Europe” and the US acted as parties to the political conflict in former Ukraine or, more precisely, its initiators.

Probably because of the peace-loving ideological foundations of the Russian foreign ministry, this thesis has yet to be voiced on the international arena. Instead, Sergey Lavrov’s ministry continues to fend off accusations of Russian involvement in the conflict in Donbass. It is difficult to blame the Donbass republics’ foreign ministries for this insufficient line, as they lack diplomatic experience. Yet it is this argument that will emerge in negotiations on the fate of Donbass and will put the blame on the United States for participating in the murder of the peaceful population of Donbass.


Related Topics:

The Earthquake that Stopped Before Hitting Ukraine and Russian Borders*

Ukraine Snapped up by the Rothschilds*

Ukraine’s Oligarchs Eradicating Each Other*

Ukraine’s Campaign of Political Assassinations of Critics*

McCain Appointed to Ukraine “Reform Advisory Team”*

Soros, the Puppet Master of Ukraine*

The Biden Dynasty Makes Its Mark in the Ukraine*

ISIL a Trojan Horse for the Biden Plan*

Pro-Fracking Law Ruled Unconstitutional by Pennsylvania Supreme Court*

Pro-Fracking Law Ruled Unconstitutional by Pennsylvania Supreme Court*

By Dan Zukowski

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s controversial Act 13 is unconstitutional, calling it a special law that benefits the shale gas industry. The massive Marcellus Shale formation, which underlies a large area of Western Pennsylvania, provides more than 36% of the shale gas produced in the U.S.

The Pennsylvania State Legislature passed Act 13 in 2012 and it was almost immediately challenged by seven of the state’s municipalities along with the Delaware Riverkeeper Network and a private physician. The onerous law enabled natural gas companies to seize privately owned subsurface property through eminent domain, placed a gag order on health professionals to prevent them from getting information on drilling chemicals that could harm their patients, and limited notification of spills and leaks to public water suppliers, excluding owners of private wells that supply drinking water for 25% of Pennsylvania residents. Act 13 also pre-empted municipal zoning of oil and gas development.

“The decision is another historic vindication for the people’s constitutional rights,” stated Jordan Yeager, lead counsel on the case representing the Delaware Riverkeeper Network and Bucks County municipalities on the case.

“The court has made a clear declaration that the Pennsylvania legislature cannot enact special laws that benefit the fossil fuel industry and injure the rest of us.”

On Dec. 19, 2013, the state Supreme Court issued a narrow ruling on the grounds that the law violated the Environmental Rights Amendment of the Pennsylvania Constitution. That ruling returned local zoning rights to municipalities. It also ordered the state Commonwealth Court to reconsider other provisions. The ruling by the Supreme Court issued Wednesday addresses those rulings and should end the litigation.

Protestors march earlier this year for clean energy.Delaware Riverkeeper Network


The state Supreme Court held that the gag order and exclusion of private wells from notification were all unconstitutional. The ruling prohibits the state Public Utility Commission from having oversight on local ordinances and from withholding certain payments from municipalities that limit shale gas drilling.

In its ruling, the state Supreme Court wrote that the eminent domain provision of Act 13 “is unconstitutional on its face, as it grants a corporation the power of eminent domain to take private property for a private purpose, in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Sections 1 and 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”

“A majority of our state legislators joined with the oil and gas industry in placing corporate desires and profits over the constitutional rights of Pennsylvania citizens,” said John Smith, the attorney who represented four Western Pennsylvania municipalities in the case.

“The Pennsylvania Supreme Court correctly found that the constitution is not a document to be ignored.”

The gas industry appeared to shrug it off. “It’s not a big deal in the grand scheme of things,” said energy attorney Michael Krancer, referring to the court’s decision.

Krancer was secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection when the law was passed.

The industry-side Marcellus Drilling News pulled no punches in its reaction to the ruling. They called the plaintiffs “seven selfish towns” (twice in one paragraph) and blamed the ruling on “four left-wing Democrat judges.” But even they admitted that, for all practical purposes, Act 13 is now dead.


Related Topics:

How to Contact the 17 Banks Funding the Dakota Access Pipeline*

First Nations in Canada and U.S. Sign Treaty Opposing Pipelines*

Ahh Fracking – that’s Why Florida is being Poisoned through the Air and drinking Water*

Fracking Companies Free to Use 70 Million Gallons Of Clean Water in the Midst of U.S. Record Drought*

Has a Foreign Fracking Company Quietly Buys Rights to Botswana Conservation Park?*

Fracking Company Must Pay $3 Million To Sickened Family*

Scotland Just Banned Fracking Forever*

Monsanto Weed Killer Poison Found in U.S. Baby Food*

Monsanto Weed Killer Poison Found in U.S. Baby Food*

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said Friday it found residues of biotechnology giant Monsanto’s weed killer in oat products for babies, according to consumer advocate U.S. Right to Know.

The testing showed residue of glyphosate, the main ingredient in Monsanto’ Roundup herbicide, the most widely used weed killer in the world.

Glyphosate was detected in oat cereals with ‘cinnamon spice’ instant oatmeal; ‘maple brown sugar’ instant oatmeal and ‘peach and cream’ as well as plain and flavoured oatmeal.

The sample results ranged from no detection to 1.67 parts per million of the weed killer.

The World Health Organization said in 2015 a team of international cancer experts determined glyphosate is a probable human carcinogen, and many scientists say it impacts human health and the environment.

Monsanto currently operates in 61 countries and has more than 22,000 employees. One third of its US$15 billion in annual revenues from products with glyphosate.

Also, Monsanto has created genetically engineered crops that can resist glyphosates, such as soybeans, corn and sugar beets.

The FDA analyzes each year the residues of several types of pesticides, but skipped testing for glyphosate in the past decade. The company announced in February it would start analyzing glyphosate residues.

The FDA also found glyphosate in honey produced in the United States.

Monsanto has said in repeated occasions that glyphosate levels in food are too low for it to cause health problems in humans.

Taiwan, earlier this year, recalled 130,000 pounds of oat products that had glyphosate residues.


Related Topics:

Quaker Oats Sued for Glyphosate in ‘100% Natural’ Products*

Glyphosate in your Bread*

Sri Lanka’s New President Puts Immediate Ban on Glyphosate*

Sri Lankan President Bans Monsanto’s Weedkiller that Causes Kidney Disease*

Dutch Parliament Bans Weedkiller for Private Use*

Glyphosate has been a Known Carcinogen Since the 1970s*

European Food Authority Concludes that “Glyphosate is Safe”

GM Pollen in Honey Labelled as Natural by the EU*