Archive | October 17, 2016

The Winged Bull of Nimrod and Part of the Temple of Baal Are Being Displayed in the Coliseum In Rome*

The Winged Bull of Nimrod and Part of the Temple of Baal Are Being Displayed in the Coliseum In Rome*

First Syria’s Palmyra Gate/Gate of the Gods, and now Iraq’s the Temple of Baal… hmmm. Is there some sort of cabalistic ritual going on in the launching of the New World Order? Remember, they ere experts at re-writing history, and making true what they want us to believe…

If you thought having “the harbinger of Baal” in New York City was bad, wait until you hear what they are doing in Rome.

A reproduction of a winged bull from the ancient city of Nimrud, Iraq and a recreation of part of the ceiling from the Temple of Bel (Baal) are being put on display in the Coliseum in Rome, Italy.  This exhibit has been entitled “Rising From the Ashes: Ebla, Nimrud, Palmyra“, and it is being sponsored by UNESCO.  As I will discuss below, the statue of the winged bull from Nimrud and the Temple of Bel both have direct links to ancient Babylon and a very insidious character from the Bible known as Nimrod.  Symbols have meaning, and to have these symbols erected at one of the most famous landmarks in Rome is more than just a little bit disturbing.

From ancient times, Nimrod and the various pagan gods that were based on Nimrod were often represented as human-animal hybrids.  In this case, a bull with a human head that also has wings is known as a “lamassu”.  According to Wikipedia, lamassu statues can currently be found “at the Gate of All Nations at Persepolis in Iran, the British Museum in London, the Musée du Louvre in Paris, the National Museum of Iraq in Baghdad, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York and the Oriental Institute, Chicago.”

Assyrian winged bulls at Iraq's national museum in Baghdad

Assyrian winged bulls at Iraq’s national museum in Baghdad

The lamassu statue that has been put on display in Rome is a full scale reproduction of one that was destroyed by ISIS in the city of Nimrud, Iraq.  The following comes from an article about this exhibit in the New York Times

A statue of a human-headed winged bull from the Northwest Palace in Nimrud, Iraq, that wasbulldozed by the Islamic State last year to great outcry has been faithfully recreated using modern technology and put on exhibit at the Colosseum in Rome to spur discussion of the possible reconstruction of war-torn archaeological sites.

But it isn’t just the statue that has a link to Nimrod.  The city where this lamassu statue once stood is actually named “Nimrud”, and as Wikipedia has pointed out, experts believe that the name “Nimrud” was derived from the Biblical character “Nimrod”…

Archeologists believe that the city was given the name Nimrud in modern times after the Biblical Nimrod, a legendary hunting hero. The city was identified as the Biblical city of Calah (HebrewKelah (כלח), Greek Khalakh (χαλαχ)), also written Kalhu, first referred to alongside Nimrod in Genesis 10, by Henry Rawlinson in 1850 on the basis of a possible interpretation of the city’s cuneiform proper name as “Levekh”.

And if the original name of the ancient city was indeed “Calah”, then it is quite appropriate that the city has now been named after Nimrod, because he is the one that actually founded “Calah” in the first place according to the Bible.  The following is what Genesis 10:8-12 says in the Modern English Version

Cush was the father of Nimrod. He became a mighty one on the earth. He was a mighty hunter before theLord. Therefore it is said, “Even like Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord.”  The beginning of his kingdom was Babel Uruk, Akkad, and Kalneh in the land of Shinar.  From that land he went to Assyria and built Nineveh, the city Rehoboth Ir, and Calah,  and Resen between Nineveh and Calah (that is the principal city).

Winged Bull of the masons city Philadelphia

Winged Bull of the masons city Philadelphia

Nimrod was the grandson of Noah, and according to tradition he played a major role in turning humanity away from God after the Flood.  He founded many of the greatest cities of the ancient Middle East, and for a time he ruled over virtually all of the known world.  In other words, he created the very first “New World Order” in the post-flood era.  And according to Josephus, it was Nimrod that initiated the construction of the Tower of Babel…

Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to reach. And that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers.

Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion

A winged bull is the symbol of Dalian City, China

A winged bull is the symbol of Dalian City, China

In addition to “the winged bull of Nimrod”, other reproductions are also part of the exhibit in Rome.  The following comes from an article in the Guardian

Alongside the winged bull, the exhibition will feature a reconstruction of the Temple of Bel at Palmyra, which was considered Syria’s most important site, and a room of the State Archives of Ebla. All three have been rebuilt to their original dimensions.

Organisers said the purpose of the exhibition was to raise public awareness about the destruction of cultural heritage, and to promote the protection of sites and monuments from war and environmental catastrophes.

The article in the Guardian makes it sound like a complete reproduction of the entire Temple of Bel is going up, but the New York Times says that it is just a portion of the ceiling that will be displayed.

In any event, this is quite alarming as well, because this represents yet another very strong link to Nimrod.

In a previous article, I included a quote from Wikipedia that discusses how “Bel” is an ancient Babylonian term for “Lord” or “Master”, and that “Baal” comes from that original root word…

Bel (/ˈbeɪl/; from Akkadian bēlu), signifying “lord” or “master”, is a title rather than a genuine name, applied to various gods in the Mesopotamian religion of Akkad, Assyria and Babylonia. The feminine form is Belit ‘Lady, Mistress’. Bel is represented in Greek as Belos and in Latin as Belus. Linguistically Bel is an East Semitic form cognate with Northwest Semitic Baal with the same meaning.

The title of “Bel” or “Baal” seems to have originally been used primarily for the Babylonian god Marduk.  Here is more from Wikipedia

Bel became especially used of the Babylonian god Marduk and when found in Assyrian and neo-Babylonian personal names or mentioned in inscriptions in a Mesopotamian context it can usually be taken as referring to Marduk and no other god. Similarly Belit without some disambiguation mostly refers to Bel Marduk’s spouse Sarpanit. However Marduk’s mother, the Sumerian goddess called Ninhursag, Damkina, Ninmah and other names in Sumerian, was often known as Belit-ili ‘Lady of the Gods’ in Akkadian.

So where did “Marduk” come from?

Well, many scholars have traced the worship of Marduk all the way back to the historical figure of Nimrod

Traditionally the Tower of Babel event has been associated with Nimrod, and Jewish commentaries as well as the Jewish historian Josephus both seem very emphatic on this point. Regarding the Sumerian name Enmer-kar, the suffix “kar” means “hunter,” and so “Enmer-kar” is in fact “Enmer the Hunter,” just as Nimrod is referred to as the “Mighty Hunter” in Genesis 10. Furthermore, Enmerkar is named on the Sumerian King List as “the one who built Uruk,” just as Nimrod is described in Genesis 10:10 as having a kingdom that began in “Babel (Eridu) and Erech (Uruk)… in the land of Shinar.” After Enmerkar’s death he became honored in Sumerian myth as the semi-divine hero Ninurta, and eventually this cult evolved into the great cult of Marduk, which became the state religion of Babylon after the conquests and religious innovations of Hammurabi.

St. Luke stained glass in St. Mary the Virgin Church, Badby, Northamptonshire, England, UK

St. Luke stained glass in St. Mary the Virgin Church, Badby, Northamptonshire, England, UK

Are you starting to see how everything fits together?

What makes all of this far more alarming for our day and time is the fact that a number of prominent scholars such as Tom Horn, Dr. Michael Lake and Peter Goodgame are convinced that there seems to be a very strong link in the Scriptures between the coming Antichrist and the historical figure of Nimrod.

So could it be possible that when we are erecting these symbols that we are laying out “welcome mats” for the Antichrist?

Widmerpool Church Winged Bull corbel in porch, U.K.

Widmerpool Church Winged Bull corbel in porch, U.K.

It is also very interesting to note that many scholars believe that Rome is the “Mystery Babylon” described in Revelation 17 and Revelation 18.  One excellent work on this topic that I would highly commend is “A Woman Rides The Beast” by Dave Hunt. So it is more than just a little bit odd that these symbols that have a direct connection to Nimrod have been put up in the exact city that many believe is the “Mystery Babylon” described in the Bible.

I know that I have covered some very deep stuff very rapidly in this article.  What I have just briefly summarized would take an entire college course to fully unpack. But you don’t have to be an expert to see that something very strange is going on.  Monuments that have a direct link back to Nimrod and to ancient Babylon are starting to be erected all over the world, and I believe that is a very ominous sign for our future.

Source*

Related Topics:

The Occult and U.S. Evacuation of ISIS/Israeli Military Commanders from Ramadi*

The Occult Reasoning behind the Cabal’s Battle for Syria*

Mayor of London Unveils Replica of Palmyra’s Arch of Triumph in Central London*

What’s Left of Palmyra*

G20 Meets In China To Fight Anti-Globalism and Usher In New World Order*

ISIS Stealing and Selling Ancient Syrian Artefacts to Buyers from the U.S. and Europe*

Replica of Syrian Arch Destroyed by ISIS unveiled in New York City*

Greater Israel and the Tale of Two Temples*

Whoever Controls Eurasia Controls the World*

Pope and the One World Religion?*

Advertisements

Spy Agencies Illegally Collected Personal Data on British Citizens for 10 Years*

Spy Agencies Illegally Collected Personal Data on British Citizens for 10 Years*

 

British spy agencies broke privacy rules by secretly and illegally collecting massive amounts of U.K. citizens’ confidential personal information for more than 10 years, top judges have ruled.

Responding to a complaint brought by Privacy International, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) has ruled that the collection of bulk personal data – conducted by GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 between 1998 and 2015 – was unlawful.

It ruled that surveillance of individuals’ phone and web use had been taking place without adequate safeguards or supervision for more than a decade.

It also says some instances of data collection were in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which ensures all citizens have the right to a private life and that any interference with personal data must be lawful and necessary.

Its collection of ‘Bulk Communications Data’ (BCD) and ‘Bulk Personal Datasets’ (BPD) by the agencies “failed to comply” with ECHR protections until codes of practices were put in place in 2015, the tribunal added.

BCD consists of the ‘where, when and what’ of messages sent to individuals. BDP allows officials to collect information that could cover health, tax and electoral information.

“While each of these datasets in themselves may be innocuous, intelligence value is added in the interaction between multiple datasets,” the court documents state.

The tribunal revealed the collection of financial data was also of particular concern.

“The fact that [MI5] holds bulk financial, albeit anonymised, data is assessed to be a high corporate risk, since there is no public expectation that the service will hold or have access to this data in bulk.

“Were it to become widely known that the service held this data, the media response would most likely be unfavourable and probably inaccurate.”

The tribunal also reveals internal warnings to the staff of security agencies not to use databases to search for information “about other members of staff, neighbours, friends, acquaintances, family members and public figures.”

Privacy International’s legal officer Millie Graham Wood said the ruling was “a long overdue indictment of U.K. surveillance agencies riding roughshod over our democracy and secretly spying on a massive scale.”

Privacy International added that the judgment did not specify whether the unlawfully obtained and sensitive personal data would now be deleted.

Commenting on the ruling, the Home Office said:

“The powers available to the security and intelligence agencies play a vital role in protecting the U.K. and its citizens.

“We are therefore pleased the tribunal has confirmed the current lawfulness of the existing bulk communications data and bulk personal dataset regimes.

“Through the investigatory powers bill, the government is committed to providing greater transparency and stronger safeguards for all of the bulk powers available to the agencies.”

Source*

Related Topics:

U.K. Spying Report Warned of Intelligence Failure*

U.K. GPs to Gather Info on Sick Patients for the State*

Britain Ranked as One of the Worst Countries for Abuse of Privacy Rights*

U.K. Bill Hands vast Surveillance Powers to Police and Intelligence Agencies*

At these 3 British Airports, a U.S. Spy Agency Decides Who can Travel*

GCHQ gets Green Light to Spy on MPs*

GCHQ and MI5 Exploit Lawyer-Client Privilege*

Britain’s Police State Targeting Key Individuals*

Britain Moves from Democracy to Authoritarian State in Pernicious Veil of Secrecy*

Russia Today Shut Down By U.K. Government*

Russia Today Shut Down By U.K. Government*

 

 

International broadcaster RT have had their U.K. bank accounts blocked, editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan reported via Twitter earlier Monday, October 17. The NatWest Bank, part of the Royal Bank of Scotland group, announced that it was removing the broadcaster from its clients list, which has raised questions about media freedom in the U.K.
“Our accounts in Britain have been blocked. All of them. ‘Decision not to be discussed’. Hail to freedom of speech!” RT’s editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan, said on her Twitter account, in Russian.

National Westminster Bank (NatWest), which is part of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), did not give an explanation to the broadcaster as to why their account had been blocked. The letter addressed to RT, simply said that the decision had been taken “after careful consideration.”

Journalist Roshan Salih, has also faced pressure from the U.K. government, when he worked for Iranian media organization Press TV. Mr. Salih said that seeing RT’s situation was like deja vu, as it was only a few years prior that he and his colleagues had faced a similar situation.

“It’s a political decision and its designed to impede on your ability to operate, it’s a direct attack on freedom of speech as ultimately, if you attack the source of an organization’s finances, you will eventually squeeze them and inhibit their ability to operate and to communicate effectively… that is what happened to press TV. Compared to how we operated in the U.K. before the sanctions were imposed and our bank accounts [were] shut down, we were much more of an effective voice, so it’s all about silencing Russia Today basically,” Mr. Salih told Sputnik.

Mr. Salih explained that it was a completely unnecessary move and that the U.K. government and media are constantly attacking Russia.

“RT, compared to the [UK] political propaganda machine, are just a small voice in the British media landscape and Press TV was a small voice. So, to attack it in this way is completely needless and it will backfire as it just portrays the British state going against its own values, such as freedom of speech…” Mr. Salih told Sputnik.

Roshan Salih explains that there are a number of state run TV news outlets around the world, from Al Jazeera, to France 24, TRT and of course Press TV, but the government’s focus seems directed at specific countries.

“It seems the only state media that are allowed to operate in this country are the ones who the British government seems to agree with. So there won’t be any attack on TRT, or France 24, and Al Jazeera. But the ones that are targeted are the ones that the British government has a problem with and that is Russia and Iran,” Mr. Salih told Sputnik.

Asked if the blocking of RT’s bank accounts had been a decision made by the bank or the state, Mr. Salih was adamant that it was the U.K. government who had enforced this decision.

“They [the U.K. government] are putting pressure on them [banks]. You ask them [the banks] for the reasons and they won’t give the reasons. There is only one logical explanation and that is that the state is putting pressure on them,” Mr. Salih said.

Is it worth for the broadcaster to take the bank to court?

“Our experience with Press TV is that it was a pointless exercise in terms of getting any results as the sanctions are tighter and even though the nuclear deal is signed the sanctions are still in place.

“But I think for the purposes of setting the record straight and public relations it’s a process that RT need to go through. Also Russia is more powerful then Iran.

“Britain can ignore Iran, whereas Russia has many more levers and is a more powerful global player than Iran is, so perhaps Russia can enact those levers to put pressure back onto the British. Also from my point of view, as someone who works in the media, I wonder what implications this will have for the British state organizations that operate in Moscow, surely there will be some reciprocal move from Moscow to hinder their ability to operate and I think this is only fair,” Mr. Salih told Sputnik.
So, if the government is making decisions on behalf of the banks, is there any really autonomy or independence?

“There is a low level conflict going on between Russia and the West and higher level conflict going on between Iran and the West and when those ultimate big decisions of state come into place, then the judiciary in those countries is no longer independent and neither is the banking sector, so ultimately politics rules everything,” Mr. Salih told Sputnik.
According to a U.K. government source, the issue between NatWest and RT is a matter for the bank, the government has not changed the terms of sanctions in regards to Russia since 2015, and the source said that the decision was in connection to what is considered risk appetite.

Related Topics:
U.K.’s PM Bans Ministers Talking to the Media*
Glasgow Police Will Visit People who Make ‘Unnecessary’ Social Media Posts*
U.S. and U.K. Flagrant Abuse of Int’l Law*

Britain Ranked as One of the Worst Countries for Abuse of Privacy Rights*

The U.K. Establishment Toppling the Opposition, Jeremy Corbyn*

True To Form U. S. not meeting commitments under Iranian deal Says Judge*

True To Form U. S. not meeting commitments under Iranian deal Says Judge*

 

Iranian Judiciary Chief Ayatollah Sadeq Amoli Larijani lashed out at the US government for the failure to honor its commitments under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a nuclear agreement between Tehran and six world countries.

Addressing a meeting of high-ranking judiciary officials in Tehran on Monday, Ayatollah Amoli Larijani said Washington is abdicating responsibility in honoring the JCPOA commitments on the pretext that it has already fulfilled its undertakings.

There were fears in the course of nuclear negotiations that the U.S. could keep the anti-Iran sanctions in place with new justifications, he noted, adding that the White House did exactly what the Iranian team of negotiators had explained as an unlikely scenario.

Such breach of the deal by the U.S. demonstrates that American politicians are deceitful, do not care about the moral principles and just think about their personal interests, Ayatollah Amoli Larijani deplored.

In September, Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said he has never been optimistic about the U.S. genuine desire to honor its commitments, and that is why the country’s diplomats discussed everything in detail during the nuclear negotiations with the Group 51 (Russia, China, the U.S., Britain, France and Germany), which resulted in the JCPOA.

Zarif explained that Iran entered the nuclear negotiations on the basis of “pessimism about the U.S.”, saying it was proved later that such distrust was not unreasonable.

While many consider the JCPOA a major breakthrough in the improvement of ties between Iran and the West, Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei has made it clear that Tehran’s policy toward the U.S. will remain unchanged regardless of the nuclear deal.

The accord took effect in January and was supposed to terminate all nuclear-related sanctions against Iran all at once, but its implementation has been hampered mainly due to U.S. policies.

Source*

Related Topics:

U.S. Fires Captain Detained by Iran in January*

Iran Files Complaint against Bankrupt U.S. Theft of Funds*

Iran to Sue U.S. Over $2 Billion Supreme Court Ruling*

British Military Expert, Israel Must Strike Iran – On Its Own*

Entrapment: Iran Lifting Sanctions and Coming Betrayal*

U.S. to Pay Iran $1.7bn in Debt, Interest*

U.K. – U.S. Responds to Aleppo Siege with More Sanctions against Syrian Civilians*

U.K. – U.S. Responds to Aleppo Siege with More Sanctions against Syrian Civilians*

Something’s not right about this but I can’t think what it is!

Something’s not right about this but I can’t think what it is!

Something’s not right about this but I can’t think what it is!

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry stated on Sunday that more sanctions could be imposed on the Syrian and Russian people over the conflict in Syria.

Kerry asserted that the United State and Great Britain are looking to impose more economic sanctions against Russia and Syria because of their siege on the eastern neighborhoods of Aleppo.

The U.S. and Great Britain have already imposed inhuman sanctions against the Syrian civilians for several years, despite their constant complaints about humanitarian aid reaching the people.

Source*

Related Topics:

Russia Blocks U.N.’s Syria Sanctions Attempt over Questionable Chemical Attack Report*

EU renews Syria sanctions for 1 year

As far as Honour Goes U.S. has None: Tries to Bait Russia with Lifting of Sanctions for Russian Withdrawal from Syria*

Aleppo Doctor Attacks Western Media for Bias, Censorship and Lies*

#AleppoIsBurning Campaign Created By U.S. and NATO to Facilitate a “No Bomb Zone”*

U.S. Deploys Troops near Aleppo City*

Terrorists Reject U.N. offer of Safe Passage from East Aleppo*

U.S. Suffers Massive Defeat as Terrorists Crushed in Northern Aleppo*

Syrian Army ends 3-year siege of 2 Shia Towns in Aleppo*

Thousands of Terrorists in Syria Flee to North Aleppo*

U.S. Bombs Aleppo Blames Russia*

Turkey Bombards Kurdish-held Areas of Syria’s Aleppo Province*

Eye Witness Account inside Aleppo, Syria*

Water Returns to Syria’s Aleppo after Daesh (ISIS) Stoppage*

U.S.-Backed Terrorists Shell Aleppo Hospital, but Blame Russia and Syria*

Multiple Casualties in Bombing of Refugee Camp Near Aleppo *

U.S. Working to Block Syrian Liberation of Aleppo from al-Nusra*

Challenging the MSF Narratives and Bias in Aleppo*

Hezbollah Captures CIA Officer in Aleppo, Commanding al Qaeda*

Syrian Army Destroys Al-Nusra HQ in Aleppo*

Syrian Army Captured Major Militant Warehouse with U.S. Weapons in Aleppo*

U.S. Air Force Accidentally Bombs own ‘Rebels’ in Aleppo*

Thirty Israeli, Foreign Intelligence Officers Killed in Russia’s Calibre Missile Attack in Aleppo*

U.S. -Backed Terrorists Shut Off Water for 1.5 Million Civilians in Aleppo*

The Occult Reasoning behind the Cabal’s Battle for Syria*

First Children Arrive in U.K. from the Barbaric Calais Jungle Refugee Camp*

First Children Arrive in U.K. from the Barbaric Calais Jungle Refugee Camp*

A Kurdish Iraqi family prepares to board a bus to leave the “Jungle” migrant camp in Calais on 12 October, 2016 (AFP)

 

A first busload of children arrived in Britain on Monday from the “Jungle” camp near the French port of Calais as the British government started to act on its commitment to take in unaccompanied migrant children before the camp is destroyed.

The fate of children staying in the Jungle, a squalid camp where up to 10,000 people fleeing war or poverty in the Middle East and Africa have converged seeking ways to cross to Britain, has been a political problem for the British government.

Religious leaders, refugee rights campaign groups and opposition parties have accused the government of dragging its heels on helping to move unaccompanied children out of the camp, which France has said it will soon demolish.

The French and British interior ministers, Bernard Cazeneuve and Amber Rudd, agreed in talks on 10 October to speed up the process of moving children eligible to go to Britain out of the Jungle.

Fourteen children, the first whose cases have been processed, arrived by bus in Croydon, south London, to be reunited with relatives already living in Britain. Faith leaders and aid workers were on hand to welcome and assist them.

The camp at Calais is a desperate, dangerous, horrible place, nowhere any adult should be, let alone any child,” said Bishop of Croydon Jonathan Clark.

“So this is a really good day to celebrate as some of those children begin to make their journeys to be reunited with their families,” he told reporters outside a Croydon church.

It is not known exactly how many children will be brought to Britain. The British interior ministry has said 80 children had been accepted for transfer from France so far this year under EU family reunification rules known as the Dublin regulation.

The Red Cross estimates that 1,000 unaccompanied children are living in the Jungle, of whom 178 have been identified as having family ties to Britain. It has said some of these children have been held back by bureaucracy.

Separately from the Dublin process, Britain has sent out a team to work with the French authorities to identify children who can be brought to Britain under the terms of a change to British immigration law known as the Dubs amendment.

It states that Britain will take in “vulnerable unaccompanied child refugees” who arrived in the E.U. before 20 March, even if they do not have relatives in Britain.

The 20 March was the date of an E.U.-Turkey deal aimed at limiting the flow of migrants into the bloc, which reached crisis levels in 2015.

The Dubs amendment is named after the politician who proposed it, Alf Dubs, who came to Britain as a Jewish child refugee fleeing Nazi persecution.

Source*

Related Topics:

Refugee Children being Raped in Calais Camp*

Far-right Activists Impersonated Police, Attacked Refugees, Stole their Possessions in Calais*

Almost 130 Refugee Children Vanish after ‘Calais Jungle’ Demolition*

Children Sexually Assaulted at E.U.’s Official Refugee Camps*

Multiple Casualties in Bombing of Refugee Camp Near Aleppo *

Thirty Syrian Boys Raped in Turkish Refugee Camp*

European Refugee Camps in Syria During WWII*

Rape and Organ Theft in Turkish Refugee Camps*

Child Abuse in Australian Detention Camp*

Mass Migration as Weapons of War*

 

New U.N. Chief is a Globalist, Socialist, Extremist*

New U.N. Chief is a Globalist, Socialist, Extremist*

By Alex Newman

Globalism-loving socialist Antonio Guterres of Portugal (shown), infamous primarily for helping to engineer the massive tsunami of Islamic immigration into the West, has been officially selected as the next secretary-general of the United Nations. His prescription for what ails the world: more socialism at the planetary level, more power for the UN, more “global governance,” and more mass migration from the Third World to Western countries. In other words, more of the same extremism that already has the world and the West on the brink.

Guterres was formally selected last week by the UN Security Council, beating out corrupt Bulgarian communist and UNESCO chief Irina Bokova, who was the “correct” gender but whose horrifying record was exposed prior to her selection. The UN General Assembly, dominated by unfree governments and dictatorships, confirmed Guterres for the job on October 13. The Portuguese bureaucrat, 67, was the Socialist prime minister of Portugal before becoming the U.N. “High Commissioner for Refugees” in 2005. He also led the global tyranny-promoting Socialist International.

The Portuguese politician and bureaucrat will assume office in January of 2017. In his capacity as chief administrative officer of the U.N., he will oversee almost 50,000 U.N. bureaucrats and counting. He will also help manage more than 100,000 scandal-plagued U.N. “peacekeeping” troops, currently facing global criticism for raping children around the world, trafficking sex slaves, slaughtering unarmed protesters and Christians, killing tens of thousands of Haitians with cholera, persecuting whistleblowers, and more — all with total impunity. The scandals have become so horrifying that even the U.S. Congress has threatened to withhold funds.

One of the many giant red flags (no pun intended) on Guterres’ troubling résumé is his presidency, from 1999 to 2005, of the Socialist International. Often referred to as SI, the outfit is an alliance of socialist and communist political parties from around the world, including many re-branded “former” communist parties from the Cold War era that murdered and tortured huge numbers of people. Despite the lack of coverage the outfit receives from the U.S. establishment media, the SI alliance is extraordinarily powerful — especially at the U.N., where its members control a massive voting bloc and multiple U.N. bureaucracies.

The outfit is also extremely radical and dangerous. To understand just how extreme Socialist International is, consider that, in 2012, the alliance unapologetically held its annual Congress in an African nation led by a Marxist-Leninist member political party that, according to leading genocide experts, was at that very moment engaged in the planning and preparation phase of genocide in a bid to exterminate an embattled minority group. Earlier that year, the president and party chief who hosted the SI Congress even went on national television to sing songs in front of his military about massacring members of the minority group with his machine gun. SI profusely praised its hosts nonetheless.

Representatives from murderous and un-free regimes and totalitarian parties from around the world came together, as they do every year, to demand more “global governance,” more wealth redistribution from Western taxpayers to their corrupt governments, what they call “Global Welfare Statehood,” and other extremism. “During this critical juncture for regional and world peace it is imperative that the role of the United Nations (U.N.) must be strengthened,” one SI resolution from that year stated before listing all the ways in which the controversial dictators club should be further empowered.

At its 1962 conference in Oslo, the SI came out and said it:

“The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government.”

At its latest meeting last month, the SI also demanded that Western nations submit to international bureaucracies in the resettling of massive amounts of foreigners within their borders — at taxpayer expense. The SI’s members, over 160 parties from more than 100 nations, also demanded more global socialism and wealth redistribution.

Of course, socialist and communist regimes have killed more than 100 million of their own people over the last century, according to conservative estimates. And yet, the totalitarians always insist that utopia is just around the corner — just a few more purges and executions and gulags will be needed before the glories of socialism and communism become clear to the proletariat. If there are any remaining doubts about the horrors, savagery, and barbarism of socialism and communism, a quick visit to the utopias of Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, or Zimbabwe — all voting U.N. members, some even on the U.N. “human rights council” — should put them to rest.

Yet despite the utter failure, misery, terror, starvation, and mass death inevitably produced by the implementation of such collectivist “ideologies,” the proponents of the extremism remain firmly entrenched in power around the world, as evidenced by Guterres’ successful bid to lead the U.N. Even the Obama administration and the allegedly conservative British government had to sign off on the socialist radical. Most of his fellow candidates for UN chief, too, were communists and socialists, in addition to being globalist radicals.

Another red flag on Guterres’ CV was his decade-long stint as U.N. refugee boss, a position he held until last year. As Guterres and his office engineered a tidal wave of Islamic immigration into the West, he also implemented a policy to systematically discriminate against Middle East Christians — the very people who, even according to the U.S. State Department, are still facing genocide at the hands of Islamic extremists. Even though almost 10 percent of Syria’s population is Christian, for example, less than 1 percent of the refugees resettled by the U.N. refugee agency in the Western world have been Christian.

Indeed, Guterres’ U.N. “refugee” officials preside over camps where Christians are systematically brutalized, beaten, and even murdered by Islamist “refugees.” U.S. taxpayer-funded aid is also doled out by the U.N. in a highly bigoted and discriminatory manner, bypassing Christians in favor of Muslims. “Since August 2014, other than initial supplies of tents and tarps, the Christian community in Iraq has received nothing in aid from any U.S. aid agencies or the U.N.,” said Stephen Rasche, the resettlement official for the Chaldean Catholic Archdiocese in Erbil, Iraq.

As The New American has reported many times, the ancient Christian communities of Iraq and Syria are facing extinction thanks, at least in part, to U.S. and UN policy in the region. Yet Guterres insists that Christians must remain there to be butchered, while potentially radicalized Muslims must be imported to Europe and the United States by the millions, all at taxpayer expense under the auspices of U.N. officials. In a recent TV interview, Guterres even proposed using airplanes to fly massive numbers of Muslims into Europe from Africa and the Middle East because the optics would be better. He also referred to opposition to his open borders and mass-migration extremism as “irrational.”

“Migration is, in my opinion, part of the solution to the global problems,” he claimed.

The agenda, though, is clear, and it has nothing to do with “protecting refugees” or “humanitarianism.” Guterres and his fellow globalist-socialist extremists are not fooling everyone. In Hungary, for example, Prime Minister Viktor Orban has blasted what he termed a “criminal conspiracy” of internationalist fanatics. In essence, he has argued in multiple speeches that these globalist conspirators, based largely in European Union HQ in Brussels, were using mass Islamic immigration as a weapon to undermine Western civilization, Christendom, and the nation-state on the road toward what globalists often refer to as their “New World Order.”

He is right, as even top Insiders such as former Goldman Sachs boss and Bilderberg leader Peter Sutherland, in his capacity as U.N. migration czar, explained publicly. In an interview posted on the UN’s own website, Sutherland said he would urge governments to “recognize that sovereignty is an illusion — that sovereignty is an absolute illusion that has to be put behind us.” He also said

“the days of hiding behind borders and fences are long gone.”

Westerners must take on “some of the old shibboleths” and “the old historic memories and images of our own country” and realize that we are all “part of humankind.” In other words, no more nations, no more borders — just global totalitarian rule, with people like Sutherland and his extremist cohorts at the helm.

Columnists and commentators at major publications have already expressed serious concern about Guterres’ extremism.

“As president of Socialist International, Guterres envisaged a radical model of government led by a U.N. parliamentary assembly that would facilitate the emergence of ‘global citizens,’” wrote Jennifer Oriel in The Australian newspaper, citing quotes from the SI congress’ resolutions during his term at the helm of the alliance.

Among other extremism, SI declared that its goal was to “parliamentarise the global political system” by establishing a “U.N. parliamentary assembly.”

Not surprisingly, perhaps, outgoing U.N. boss Ban Ki Moon last year began preparing the way, loudly and repeatedly referring to the dictators club he leads as the “Parliament of Humanity.” He continually referred to the U.N.’s radical Agenda 2030, meanwhile, which demands national and international socialism and other extremism, as the world’s “Declaration of Interdependence” for “We The Peoples” of the planet. In short, the independence of the United States — and the God-given rights of her people by extension — are under direct assault by the U.N. and its allies in Washington, D.C., and worldwide.

The mass-migration disaster Guterres helped orchestrate also faced criticism in The Australian newspaper.

“During his term as U.N. high commissioner for refugees, he acted in accordance with socialist ideology by pressuring Western states to open borders and accept a large influx of immigrants from Islamic regimes,” Oriel observed.

“Despite the evidence that open border policy facilitated transnational jihadism and the mass murder of Western innocents, Guterres continued to shame governments that protect their citizens with secure borders.”

Guterres also praised the League of Arab States in 2007 in his capacity as U.N. refugee boss, telling them that Islamic sharia law — which calls for executing apostates, among other things — was an “invaluable foundation for the legal framework” used by his U.N. bureaucracy.

While noting that most of the world’s refugees were Muslim, rather than attacking the Islamist, socialist, globalist, and authoritarian regimes that produce refugees, he lashed out at Western “racism” and “xenophobia” as the chief cause of refugee victimhood, Oriel reported. Meanwhile, more than a few Arab dictatorships continue to refuse Muslim immigrants from Syria and Iraq, preferring to use the U.N. to send them to the West instead.

Ironically, even in his assigned job by its own dubious metrics, Guterres has been a failure. In 2010, the U.N.’s own internal auditors warned that his agency’s dubious operations and money management were putting future contributions from member governments (taxpayers) at risk. According to an April 2016 U.N. report about the UNHCR bureaucracy, the management was “unsatisfactory” during Guterres’ tenure. And that criticism is from the unsatisfactory U.N., where incompetence, brazen corruption, criminality, and other horrors — even systematic sexual abuse of children by UN “peace” troops — are the norm.

With yet another extremist espousing deadly and fringe ideologies such as socialism, open borders, and globalism on the world stage, it is past time for the United States to officially withdraw from the U.N. dictators club. Legislation already in Congress, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (HR 1205), would accomplish that in one fell swoop. Then the dictators of the world can be free to select nutty socialists and globalists as their leaders — but not at the expense of U.S. liberties and wealth.

Source*

Related Topics:

New U.N. Secretary-General, Portugal’s Guterres*

Top Rothschild Bankster Pushes Corrupt Communist to Lead U.N.*

Terrorists Reject U.N. offer of Safe Passage from East Aleppo*

Russia Vetoed a U.N. backed French-drafted Resolution that Would End Air Strikes against ISIS*

Haiti Sues U.N. For Cholera Outbreak Which Has Infected 770,000 People | U.N. Claims “Absolute Immunity”*

Indigenous Communities Forcefully Removed for U.N. Sponsored Panama Dam*

U.N. to Send 4,000 Soldiers to South Sudan despite Govt. Opposition*

U.N. Vaccine Program has Deliberately Killed Syrian Kids*

U.N. Approve the Use of Force to ‘Protect Civilians’ in the Event of Armed Conflicts*

U.N. Peacekeeper Gang Rapes*

The ‘Family’ Loses in the Latest U.N. Agreement*

U.N. Event Shows how Its Sex Agenda Tramples Children’s Rights*

African Woman Schools U.N. Delegate on Why Pushing Abortion is ‘neo-colonialism’*