Archive | July 5, 2017

Iraqis Travel to Mosul to Celebrate Eid in a Show of Solidarity*

Iraqis Travel to Mosul to Celebrate Eid in a Show of Solidarity*

By Sali Mahdy


‘Mosul celebrates first Eid in three years with the Eid in Mosul campaign’ uploaded on June 28, 2017 by the AlMawsleya channel.

A group of around 300 Iraqis recently traveled from south and central Iraq to Mosul to celebrate the Eid al-Fitr holiday with their newly liberated compatriots.

In the summer of 2014, the militant group Islamic State (also known as ISIS, ISIL, and Daesh) drove out Iraqi security forces and seized control of Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city, in a territorial sweep of much of northern Iraq.

It was in Mosul that the militant group’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, declared an Islamic Caliphate spanning Syria and Iraq.

Since then, life for Mosul’s residents has been one of fear, oppression, and hardship.

Daily life changed for the worse with the persecution of minorities, food and fuel shortages, and intimidation and harsh punishment.

An effort to retake the city by Iraqi security forces began in October 2016. After eight months of intense battle just a handful of neighbourhoods remain under the group’s control, prompting Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi to recently declare the end of the Islamic State.

The “Eid in Mosul” campaign was organized by a group of Iraqi activists led by Hamid al-Sayed, Ali al-Touki, and Mohammed al-Raji.

Originally an idea to visit old friends who had been trapped under Islamic State rule, the plan turned into a full-blown campaign after generating enormous interest on Facebook. More than 1,700 people expressed interest in joining the trip but security conditions would only allow 300.

This Eid was the first in three years in which Maslawis (people of Mosul) were able to publicly celebrate. The day was filled with events forbidden under the Islamic State, including poetry readings, theatre, and live music. Mosul’s visitors also brought a gift of more than 1,000 books from Baghdad as part of the “I am Iraq, I Read” campaign, an initiative promoting culture and a more educated Iraq. This gift is a start to replacing thousands of books destroyed in Mosul’s libraries by the Islamic State.

The day was joyous, bringing together Iraqis to not only celebrate the holiday, but to also celebrate the liberation of Mosul. Scenes hit social media of men and women from across the country singing the national anthem and chanting

“Brothers, Sunnis and Shia, this country is not for sale,” demonstrating a feeling of unbreakable unity shared among Iraqis.

While the event was mostly organized by activists, the government stepped in to help providing transportation and security for the event.


Men and women of Mosul greeted the “freedom caravan” at Mosul University.


Crowds gather chanting “welcome to Mosul” and singing the national anthem.



Over 1,000 books donated to restock Mosul’s libraries.

Ameen Mukdad, violinist from Mosul, plays a traditional Maslawi folk song.

The evening concluded with a fireworks display celebrating Eid and Mosul’s liberation.


Related Topics:

Iraq Declares ‘fall’ of ISIS as Military Retakes Landmark Mosul Mosque*

U.K. to Consider Stripping Tony Blair of Immunity over Role in Iraq War*

Iraqi Top Cleric Hailed by Iraqi Prime Minister in his Role in the Fight against ISIS*

Federal Judge Puts Immediate Stop to Deportations of 1,444 Iraqis in U.S.*

Syrian Army, Hezbollah Reaches Border with Iraq for the First Time in Years*

The Treasure at the Heart of Iraq

Life returns to Hammar Marshes, Iraq*

Ex British Ambassador Tells How U.K., US, and George Bush Sr. Scripted Iraq and Afghanistan Wars*

Trump-Israel Struggling to Save ISIS to divide and Conquer Syria and Iraq*

The Polio Conspiracy: Doctor Praised for Cure Actually Created New Strains and Helped Spread the Disease*

The Polio Conspiracy: Doctor Praised for Cure Actually Created New Strains and Helped Spread the Disease*

Between World War II and the Vietnam War, doctors in the United States believed it was a good thing to medically experiment on disabled people, people in mental hospitals and prisoners of the State.

They would often say it was being done for the “greater good.” Plus, these people had no recourse and couldn’t defend themselves legally nor sign consent.

These experiments included spraying pandemic flu virus up the noses of Maryland state prisoners. These experiments also included purposely giving mental patients in Connecticut hepatitis.

If that’s not enough, in a New York hospital, doctors intentionally injected cancer cells into chronically ill people.

Of course, there is the well-known Tuskegee “study” where U.S. health officials observed over 500 African American men in Alabama who were already suffering from syphilis and while observing and tracking them – never gave them penicillin even though it was readily available then.

It was all about testing for cures, but at what cost?

The federally-funded study in 1942, where mental patients were injected with experimental flu vaccine, was co-authored by one Dr. Jonas Salk, who was given the label of polio vaccine inventor just one year later.

But true medical history now reveals that Dr. Jonas F. Salk, the “father of vaccines,” did not cure Polio, but actually created new strains and spread it with infected carriers.

Exposing Dr. Jonas F. Salk

For the first half of the 20th century, it was believed that Poliomyelitis virus could not be grown in tissue cultures, but then in 1954, a group of Harvard scientists, Enders, Weller and Robbins, won the Nobel Prize for physiology and medicine for exactly that – growing the virus in tissue cultures.

And because viruses require living tissue for their development, these scientists used Rhesus monkey kidneys, and Dr. Jonas F. Salk tested out his wild concoctions on the monkeys.

Within months, five major pharmaceutical firms helped Salk conclude that the concoction could work for humans, and the “formula” was handed over to Eli Lilly & Company and Cutter Labs in Berkeley, California.

Unfortunately, the formula was comprised of new strains of polio that Salk had helped create through wild experimentation, and this would soon be infecting the people that “science-based medicine” was supposed to be protecting from the very infectious disease they were getting injected by U.S. doctors, and new strains of it at that.

The Polio vaccine LIE worked and still fools millions today

Since most Americans are not educated in schools about how infectious diseases virtually disappeared and were no longer a pandemic-type of threat by the time vaccines were invented, millions of people accept vaccines and flu shots as safe and effective, or at least until someone in the family suffers chronic vaccine damage and they read about the truth from true coverage that’s been memory-holed from mass media.

Most viruses, though, especially when combined in the same inoculation, are highly unpredictable, and the theory of vaccines being safe goes out the window from the start.

Dr. Salk simply removed the kidneys of rhesus monkeys, cut them up into miniscule pieces, and placed them into vials with his special “nutrient solution.”

Then the “genius scientist” rocked the bottles for extended periods of time, as one would rock a baby, but with a mechanical machine. This was said to be the incubator for the virus that stimulated growth.

The bottles were then chilled and shipped to laboratories to separate the kidney cells and dilute them with formaldehyde, to weaken the virus (this is when the virus goes dormant, waiting for food and virtually in hibernation mode).

Finally, three different strains of the virus are MIXED TOGETHER, the formaldehyde is neutralized with sodium bisulphate, and the virus is injected into live monkeys, mice and rabbits. Voila! Polio is announced to be cured one month later, although no humans were ever tested. This is what was injected into millions of children.

Once the multi-virus combination enters the muscle tissue and blood of a human, that person can “shed” the virus easily during the first few weeks via mucus, saliva, etc.

This is now scientific fact. The Polio virus inoculation is declared “safe, potent and efficient” early in 1955 and released as the new “miracle vaccine of the century,” all over the world.

Propaganda helps people believe in the biggest lies

Immediately following the proclaimed prevention medicine for Polio, the Foundation for Infantile Paralysis ran press releases in all forms of available media that Dr. Jonas Salk invented and tested this miracle drug.

The foundation called for the manufacture of enough vaccines to inoculate over nine million children and pregnant women. American Press and Radio declared victory for Salk and the “greatest medical discovery of the century.”

Then came disastrous news. Inoculated children began contracting polio. More and more cases were being reported by the day, including satellite cases where parents and siblings of inoculated children were contracting the disease, even when the inoculated child was not suffering.

This was the “carrier” and “shedding” effect that science would later discover that happens with measles, mumps and polio alike.

The vaccinated children became the new carriers, and Western Medicine would blame anything else in the name of saving Big Pharma and the new reign of invasive, carcinogenic, immune-compromising and neurologically-impairing medicine.

Then, on June 23rd, 1955, the American Public Health Service announced that there had been 149 confirmed cases of poliomyelitis among the vaccinated, including six deaths. In most of the cases, paralysis began in the limb which was injected.

The number of cases was far greater than if no injections were given at all. Polio had struck in areas where there had been no cases reported for over 9 months. The vaccine was suspended pending a full inquiry by the National Institute of Health (NIH).

Because a multiple-virus dose cannot be predicted in terms of multiplication capabilities once in the human body, the vaccines of modern medicine are severely flawed.

This is why the vaccine industry, CDC and the allopathic world refuse to run a true double-blind, placebo-controlled study contrasting vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children and reflecting the statistics of infection from those exact diseases for which children are inoculated against.

As true history reveals, when Diphtheria and Pertussis vaccines were introduced in the 1940’s, cases of paralytic poliomyelitis skyrocketed, and those injections therefore increased susceptibility to polio.

The ultimate 60-year Polio CON revealed

The majority of Americans believe, thanks to propaganda, that polio is one of the most serious of infectious diseases, when in fact, it is actually the least serious.

Most people incur mild infection lasting only a few days and there is only ONE rare complication of the disease that destroys motor cells in the brain and spinal cord, but EVERY government advertisement and warning uses paralysis as the scare tactic and fear-mongering coercion for people to accept vaccinations as safe and effective, or at least safer than being paralyzed by a scary disease only medical doctors can “understand” and “prevent.”

But if we ignore the propaganda and dig up the real statistics, then health enthusiasts who question invasive chemicals as medicine find real answers and can trust natural medicine even more so.

It has been observed since the early 1900s that an animal that survives an attack from poliomyelitis became resistant to subsequent infections.

History shows us that human beings have very strong immune systems, even right from birth, if given the proper nutrition (including breast milk), and it has never been proven scientifically that injection of a virus or combinations of strains and viruses provides immunity in any way.

In fact, when multiplication of virus occurs, there is NO possibility of estimating the proper “dose” for a man, woman, child, infant, or the unborn child in a woman’s womb.

Therefore, inoculations cannot be simply “controlled” — and in immune-susceptible individuals leads to unforeseen results. Dr. Salk and his associates isolated more than 70 different strains of the three main types of polio, Brunhilde, Lansing and Leon.

Unfortunately, Salk created new strains by mixing multiple others with the monkey kidneys. His final guess at the IPV vaccine was random, untested on humans, and never proven safe or effective.

Still, on April 12th, 1955, the Salk (IPV) Polio Vaccine Launch took place on the tenth anniversary of President Franklin Roosevelt’s death, and the Foundation for Infantile Paralysis told the world a big fat lie, using every possible means of publicity to spread the propaganda and catapult the vaccine industry as the new leader in medicine for infectious disease prevention.

Nearly every American newspaper declared that Dr. Salk had abolished poliomyelitis. It goes down in history as the ultimate SNAFU when polio carriers were created and “released” into the wild.

America is still injecting untested Polio vaccines into the muscle tissue and blood of hundreds of millions of Americans every year.

Polio vaccine based completely on unwarranted fear and skewed statistics

Jonas Salk is famous because he is infamous. Review the facts and make informed decisions regarding vaccination based on the true history of medicine.

Before the modern era, polio was just a mild disease seldom resulting in paralysis and the largest epidemic occurred around 1950 and had significantly declined by 1955, when the vaccine was first introduced.

True causes of the spread of Polio are pre-polio vaccines, nutritional imbalances and pesticides, which contribute to immune deficiency.

Creation and promotion of Salk’s vaccine using propaganda was based on fear about losing research charities at the time. Test results of the Salk vaccine were also based on only data from the eleven (of the thirty three) U.S. states that favoured the statistics the industry desired.

When the vaccine first came out, it caused deaths and a rise in polio cases, but the detriment was covered up and the word “epidemic” was redefined. The polio cases that weren’t paralysis related were diagnosed by U.S. doctors as meningitis.

Therefore, the factors that caused the decline of polio after 1950 did not include the Salk “miracle” vaccine at all.

In fact, the vaccine was one of the causes of disease. Salk himself testified later on before a Senate subcommittee that most of the polio outbreaks since 1961 were actually caused by Sabin’s oral polio vaccine.

He may have known this would happen all along, based on the fraud and misrepresentation he was taking part in. Large scale vaccination is a failure, and nobody can review the statistics because the CDC scrubs them from record.

Several respected scientists now believe the Salk and Sabin vaccines could be responsible for the major increase in leukaemia in the United States, by combining and increasing strains, creating new forms of the disease using monkey kidneys.

In the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (August of 1997), it says that more than fifty percent of children lamed by poliomyelitis had already received THREE DOSES of oral polio vaccine BEFORE the onset of paralysis.

Still the “March of Dimes” will have one believe that polio is a rampant and violent crippler of a disease that can spread like wildfire and that the only way to be safe from it is to be injected with experimental combinations of wildly selected strains mixed with formaldehyde and aluminium.

Since 1950, polio outbreaks have mainly been caused by intensified diphtheria and whooping cough vaccinations and other pharmaceutical injections. There is even a name for it — provocation poliomyelitis.


Related Topics:

WHO Admits Vaccines Caused Polio Paralysis in ISIS Regions*

Polio Vaccine Refusal Cases among Well-educated People Baffle Officials in Pakistan*

Vaccine-derived Polio Spreading in “Polio-free” India*

Doctors Say Bill Gates Polio Vaccine Has Created Deadly ‘Super Polio’*

How Biotechnology has Made Global Polio Eradication Impossible*

Why Is Polio With 68 Cases Worldwide This Year A “Global Emergency” But Autism Not With 1 in 25 Families Affected?*

Polio Vaccine Spreads Polio-like Disease*

Millions of Americans Contaminated with SV40 Virus through Polio Vaccine

The Cabal Exploits Filipino Trauma with unneeded Polio Vaccines*

Bill Gates’ Polio Vaccine Program Eradicates Children, Not Polio*

U.K. to Consider Stripping Tony Blair of Immunity over Role in Iraq War*

U.K. to Consider Stripping Tony Blair of Immunity over Role in Iraq War*

Former President George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair nudge each other in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2009, during a ceremony where the president presented Blair with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. (AP/Gerald Herbert)

Tony Blair may face formal charges over war crimes if judges overturn a controversial ruling that gave the former Prime Minister, immunity from prosecution over the Iraq War.

Last year a British court blocked a private criminal prosecution against Blair by General Abdul-Wahid Shannan ar-Ribat, a former chief of staff of the Iraqi army. British judges, however, ruled that the international crime of “aggression” could not be brought against Blair and granted him immunity from criminal charges.

That ruling is set to be reviewed at the Royal Courts of Justice today by one of the most senior judges in the U.K. In calling for a war crimes trial in Britain and the prosecution of Blair, Michael Mansfield QC was reported by the Guardian of saying that “the offense of waging an aggressive war has effectively been assimilated into English law”.

If the immunity verdict is overturned, Tony Blair may face formal charges of war crimes over one of the worst foreign policy disasters in British history. It would also satisfy a large number of campaigners who hold Blair and the U.S. President at the time of the Iraq invasion, George Bush, personally responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi’s and the rise of terrorism in the region.

This opinion gained further momentum following the publication of the Chilcot report which accused the U.K. of aggression following Blair’s decision to invade Iraq and depose Saddam Hussain over allegations of weapons of mass destruction. Chilcot inquiry’s also concluded that the invasion of Iraq was unnecessary and undermined the United Nations.


Related Topics:

Military Families Crowd fund nearly £50k to sue Blair over Iraq*

Cameron’;s Role in Destroying Libya Compares with Blair’s in Iraq*

Tony Blair FINALLY apologises for Iraq War and admits in TV interview the conflict caused the rise of ISIS*

Ex British Ambassador Tells How U.K., US, and George Bush Sr. Scripted Iraq and Afghanistan Wars*

Iraq Will Likely Sue U.S. Govt For 2003 Invasion Following Passage of 9/11 Bill*



I’m a Paediatrician: How Transgender Ideology Has Infiltrated My Field and Produced Large-Scale Child Abuse*

I’m a Paediatrician: How Transgender Ideology Has Infiltrated My Field and Produced Large-Scale Child Abuse*

By Michelle Cretella

Transgender politics have taken Americans by surprise, and caught some lawmakers off guard.

Just a few short years ago, not many could have imagined a high-profile showdown over transgender men and women’s access to single-sex bathrooms in North Carolina.

But transgender ideology is not just infecting our laws. It is intruding into the lives of the most innocent among us—children—and with the apparent growing support of the professional medical community.

As explained in my 2016 peer reviewed article, “Gender Dysphoria in Children and Suppression of Debate,” professionals who dare to question the unscientific party line of supporting gender transition therapy will find themselves maligned and out of a job.

I speak as someone intimately familiar with the paediatric and behavioral health communities and their practices. I am a mother of four who served 17 years as a board certified general paediatrician with a focus in child behavioral health prior to leaving clinical practice in 2012.

For the last 12 years, I have been a board member and researcher for the American College of Pediatricians, and for the last three years I have served as its president.

I also sat on the board of directors for the Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity from 2010 to 2015. This organization of physicians and mental health professionals defends the right of patients to receive psychotherapy for sexual identity conflicts that is in line with their deeply held values based upon science and medical ethics.

I have witnessed an upending of the medical consensus on the nature of gender identity. What doctors once treated as a mental illness, the medical community now largely affirms and even promotes as normal.

Here’s a look at some of the changes.

The New Normal

Paediatric “gender clinics” are considered elite centres for affirming children who are distressed by their biological sex. This distressful condition, once dubbed gender identity disorder, was renamed “gender dysphoria” in 2013.

In 2014, there were 24 of these gender clinics, clustered chiefly along the east coast and in California. One year later, there were 40 across the nation.

With 215 pediatric residency programs now training future paediatricians in a transition-affirming protocol and treating gender-dysphoric children accordingly, gender clinics are bound to proliferate further.

Last summer, the federal government stated that it would not require Medicare and Medicaid to cover transition-affirming procedures for children or adults because medical experts at the Department of Health and Human Services found the risks were often too high, and the benefits too unclear.

Undeterred by these findings, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health has pressed ahead, claiming—without any evidence—that these procedures are “safe.”

Two leading paediatric associations—the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Pediatric Endocrine Society—have followed in lockstep, endorsing the transition affirmation approach even as the latter organization concedes within its own guidelines that the transition-affirming protocol is based on low evidence.

They even admit that the only strong evidence regarding this approach is its potential health risks to children.

The transition-affirming view holds that children who “consistently and persistently insist” that they are not the gender associated with their biological sex are innately transgender.

(The fact that in normal life and in psychiatry, anyone who “consistently and persistently insists” on anything else contrary to physical reality is considered either confused or delusional is conveniently ignored.)

The transition-affirming protocol tells parents to treat their children as the gender they desire, and to place them on puberty blockers around age 11 or 12 if they are gender dysphoric.

If by age 16, the children still insist that they are trapped in the wrong body, they are placed on cross-sex hormones, and biological girls may obtain a double mastectomy.

So-called “bottom surgeries,” or genital reassignment surgeries, are not recommended before age 18, though some surgeons have recently argued against this restriction.

The transition-affirming approach has been embraced by public institutions in media, education, and our legal system, and is now recommended by most national medical organizations.

There are exceptions to this movement, however, in addition to the American College of Pediatricians and the Alliance for Therapeutic Choice. These include the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, the Christian Medical and  Dental Associations, the Catholic Medical Association, and the LGBT-affirming Youth Gender Professionals.

The transgender movement has gained legs in the medical community and in our culture by offering a deeply flawed narrative. The scientific research and facts tell a different story.

Here are some of those basic facts.

  1. Twin studies prove no one is born “trapped in the body of the wrong sex.”

Some brain studies have suggested that some are born with a transgendered brain. But these studies are seriously flawed and prove no such thing.

Virtually everything about human beings is influenced by our DNA, but very few traits are hardwired from birth. All human behavior is a composite of varying degrees for nature and nurture.

Researchers routinely conduct twin studies to discern which factors (biological or non-biological) contribute more to the expression of a particular trait. The best designed twin studies are those with the greatest number of subjects.

Identical twins contain 100% of the same DNA from conception and are exposed to the same prenatal hormones. So if genes and/or prenatal hormones contributed significantly to transgenderism, we should expect both twins to identify as transgender close to 100% of the time.

Skin colour, for example, is determined by genes alone. Therefore, identical twins have the same skin colour 100% of the time.

But in the largest study of twin transgender adults, published by Dr. Milton Diamond in 2013, only 28% of the identical twins both identified as transgender. Seventy-two percent of the time, they differed. (Diamond’s study reported 20% identifying as transgender, but his actual data demonstrate a 28% figure, as I note here in footnote 19.)

That 28% of identical twins both identified as transgender suggests a minimal biological predisposition, which means transgenderism will not manifest itself without outside non-biological factors also impacting the individual during his lifetime.

The fact that the identical twins differed 72% of the time is highly significant because it means that at least 72% of what contributes to transgenderism in one twin consists of non-shared experiences after birth—that is, factors not rooted in biology.

Studies like this one prove that the belief in “innate gender identity”—the idea that “feminized” or “masculinized” brains can be trapped in the wrong body from before birth—is a myth that has no basis in science.

  1. Gender identity is malleable, especially in young children.

Even the American Psychological Association’s Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology admits that prior to the widespread promotion of transition affirmation, 75 to 95% of pre-pubertal children who were distressed by their biological sex eventually outgrew that distress. The vast majority came to accept their biological sex by late adolescence after passing naturally through puberty.

But with transition affirmation now increasing in Western society, the number of children claiming distress over their gender—and their persistence over time—has dramatically increased. For example, the Gender Identity Development Service in the United Kingdom alone has seen a 2,000 percent increase in referrals since 2009.

  1. Puberty blockers for gender dysphoria have not been proven safe.

Puberty blockers have been studied and found safe for the treatment of a medical disorder in children called precocious puberty (caused by the abnormal and unhealthy early secretion of a child’s pubertal hormones).

However, as a groundbreaking paper in The New Atlantis points out, we cannot infer from these studies whether or not these blockers are safe in physiologically normal children with gender dysphoria.

The authors note that there is some evidence for decreased bone mineralization, meaning an increased risk of bone fractures as young adults, potential increased risk of obesity and testicular cancer in boys, and an unknown impact upon psychological and cognitive development.

With regard to the latter, while we currently don’t have any extensive, long-term studies of children placed on blockers for gender dysphoria, studies conducted on adults from the past decade give cause for concern.

For example, in 2006 and 2007, the journal Psychoneuroendocrinology reported brain abnormalities in the area of memory and executive functioning among adult women who received blockers for gynecologic reasons. Similarly, many studies of men treated for prostate cancer with blockers also suggest the possibility of significant cognitive decline.

  1. There are no cases in the scientific literature of gender-dysphoric children discontinuing blockers.

Most, if not all, children on puberty blockers go on to take cross-sex hormones (estrogen for biological boys, testosterone for biological girls). The only study to date to have followed pre-pubertal children who were socially affirmed and placed on blockers at a young age found that 100% of them claimed a transgender identity and chose cross-sex hormones.

This suggests that the medical protocol itself may lead children to identify as transgender.

There is an obvious self-fulfilling effect in helping children impersonate the opposite sex both biologically and socially. This is far from benign, since taking puberty blockers at age 12 or younger, followed by cross-sex hormones, sterilizes a child.

  1. Cross-sex hormones are associated with dangerous health risks.

From studies of adults we know that the risks of cross-sex hormones include, but are not limited to, cardiac disease, high blood pressure, blood clots, strokes, diabetes, and cancers.

  1. Neuroscience shows that adolescents lack the adult capacity needed for risk assessment.

Scientific data show that people under the age of 21 have less capacity to assess risks. There is a serious ethical problem in allowing irreversible, life-changing procedures to be performed on minors who are too young themselves to give valid consent.

  1. There is no proof that affirmation prevents suicide in children.

Advocates of the transition-affirming protocol allege that suicide is the direct and inevitable consequence of withholding social affirmation and biological alterations from a gender-dysphoric child. In other words, those who do not endorse the transition-affirming protocol are essentially condemning gender-dysphoric children to suicide.

Yet as noted earlier, prior to the widespread promotion of transition affirmation, 75 to 95% of gender-dysphoric youth ended up happy with their biological sex after simply passing through puberty.

In addition, contrary to the claim of activists, there is no evidence that harassment and discrimination, let alone lack of affirmation, are the primary cause of suicide among any minority group. In fact, at least one study from 2008 found perceived discrimination by LGBT-identified individuals not to be causative.

Over 90 percent of people who commit suicide have a diagnosed mental disorder, and there is no evidence that gender-dysphoric children who commit suicide are any different. Many gender dysphoric children simply need therapy to get to the root of their depression, which very well may be the same problem triggering the gender dysphoria.

  1. Transition-affirming protocol has not solved the problem of transgender suicide.

Adults who undergo sex reassignment—even in Sweden, which is among the most LGBT-affirming countries—have a suicide rate nearly 20 times greater than that of the general population. Clearly, sex reassignment is not the solution to gender dysphoria.

Bottom Line: Transition-Affirming Protocol Is Child Abuse

The crux of the matter is that while the transition-affirming movement purports to help children, it is inflicting a grave injustice on them and their non-dysphoric peers.

These professionals are using the myth that people are born transgender to justify engaging in massive, uncontrolled, and unconsented experimentation on children who have a psychological condition that would otherwise resolve after puberty in the vast majority of cases.

Today’s institutions that promote transition affirmation are pushing children to impersonate the opposite sex, sending many of them down the path of puberty blockers, sterilization, the removal of healthy body parts, and untold psychological damage.

These harms constitute nothing less than institutionalized child abuse. Sound ethics demand an immediate end to the use of pubertal suppression, cross-sex hormones, and sex reassignment surgeries in children and adolescents, as well as an end to promoting gender ideology via school curricula and legislative policies.

It is time for our nation’s leaders and the silent majority of health professionals to learn exactly what is happening to our children, and unite to take action.


Related Topics:

Big ‘Pharma Drug Caused Transgender’*

‘Transgender Studies’ to Be Taught in U.K. Primary Schools*

Soros’ Money behind the Transgender Agenda*

Mother Pulls Children Out of School After it Introduced ‘Transgender Awareness Program’*

U.K. Offers Fast-track for Transgender Teachers and a £30,000 Grant*

U.K. Police Target Schoolchildren as Young as 4 with Tax Payer Funded, Transgender Propaganda*

European Parliament asks WHO to remove transgender from Manual of Disorders*

Raised by Transgendered Parent, but against Transgendered Adoption*

British Children as Young as 3 Referred for Transgender Treatment*

I’m Raising My Son as a Boy*


Corporate Media Continues Blackout of DNC Lawsuit Even as 2 Witnesses Die*

Corporate Media Continues Blackout of DNC Lawsuit Even as 2 Witnesses Die*

The fiancé of the late Chris Stephens is now accusing the Clintons of being part of a cover-up surrounding both the Benghazi Attack and the DNC.

By Jack Burns

The fiancé of Chris Stephens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya who was murdered in the 2012 Benghazi attack, is speaking out about his death—and the cover-up that followed.

Lydie Denier appeared on Rick Amato’s “Amato Talk” with Will Craddick, founder of, to discuss the controversial lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee, in which “one witness has died and another potential witness was murdered.” 

As The Free Thought Project has extensively reported, influential donors to the DNC are suing their political party for fraud in the 2016 presidential election where they say their candidate, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, was discriminated against. High-ranking members of the DNC, by way of Wikileaks’ DNC email publications, were caught favoring Hillary Clinton over Sanders and actively working to subvert his chances at winning the party’s nomination.

Several individuals close to the lawsuit have turned up dead, and many more plaintiffs have filed grievances with the court, asking for special protection under the law. They point to threats, intimidation and breaking and entering of their homes as proof the defendants will go out of their way to make sure that the lawsuit does not proceed.

Now, as those of us in the alternative media are pointing out, there has been a corporate media blackout of this information.

“The DNC did actually violate their own by-laws, which state that they are supposed to choose the candidate in an impartial manner, even though they’ve actually turned around and argued in court that they’re actually not required to do that,” Craddick stated with incredulity.

Craddick referred to the current issues within the DNC as a “pandora’s box” that has resulted from officials working to keep information from being leaked to the public.

There’s going to be a whole bunch of other issues that are uncovered as well—foreign influence in American politics, espionage, things of that nature,” he said.

Amato intimated all of the aforementioned issues had something to do with the Benghazi Attack, which resulted in Stephens’s death. His fiancé agreed.

I got lots of emails from people saying, ‘There were 47 deaths that the Clinton’s are involved with. Be careful not to become number 48,’” Denier said.

“Definitely, when you start telling the truth and you start to uncover … you have to be so careful.”

In the same way that the attempts to suppress the truth have been used on the DNC lawsuit, Denier said that method was used in the aftermath of the Benghazi Attack. From rumours that the attack stemmed from anti-Islamic propaganda on YouTube to rumors that Stephens was sent to die because he was killed, Denier said they were all false.

“They said it was Chris’s fault that he died because he didn’t want security, when in reality, within six weeks, he asked over 600 times for more security,” Denier said.

“And then he died, and it’s like nothing happened.”

“Don’t believe them, no, don’t believe them!” Denier said, in reference to the mainstream media’s narrative. The would-be-widow wrote a book entitled, “A Voice for Ambassador Chris Stephens,” where she goes into much more detail about her late fiancé’s death.

Questions remain as to whether full transparency in the deaths of Stephens, Seth Rich and others who have died in relation to the Clintons will ever come to light. Were they killed in an attempt to cover-up an entire political party’s misdeeds?

Were they, as Denier alleges, more Clinton bodies? These questions and more have yet to be answered, highlighting the importance of a lawsuit against the DNC that has the hope of bringing answers to the questions grieving loved ones are asking.

As for Stephens’s fiancé, she appears convinced the Clintons had something to do with his death, and she is not staying silent.


Related Topics:

DNC Lawsuit Attorneys Call for Court Protection, Citing Multiple Suspicious Deaths*

Rigging the Election – Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

Assassination Hit list Revealed in Hillary Clinton’s Emails*

Developed in Iraq, Deployed at the DNC?: Cell-Jamming Technology is Being Turned on Journalists*

Official Who Served DNC Election Fraud Papers Found Dead*

DNC Collapsing Amid Resignations in WikiLeaks Aftermath*

Oliver Stone Exposes US Warmongers at Writers Guild Awards

Related Topics:

U.S. has Killed over 20 Million People in 37 “Victim Nations” Since World War II*

Once Only Blacks Were Enslaved, Now We All Are*

U.S. Guilty of Premeditated Murder of Civilians*

Independence Day for Whom*


Once Only Blacks Were Enslaved, Now We All Are*

Once Only Blacks Were Enslaved, Now We All Are*

By Paul Craig Robert

Dees: America the worlds newest dictatorship.


The 4th of July is upon us. We will hear all sorts of patriotic BS about how wonderful we are and how thankful we are to our brave military who defends our liberty.

Not a word will be said about the destruction by the Bush and Obama regimes of the U.S. Constitution, which once protected our liberty far better than any military action.

Not a word will be said about Washington’s 16 years of purely gratuitous war in the Middle East and North Africa that has destroyed in whole or part seven countries, sending millons of war refugees to overrun the Western World and change the quality of life for Western peoples.

Not a word will be said about Washington’s ongoing insane provocations of Russia and China and Iran and Syria and North Korea that are likely to end in nuclear Armageddon.

Speeches will celebrate “the exceptional, indispensable USA,” and fireworks will go off, preludes to the onrushing nuclear Armageddon.

While we listen to speeches of our wonderful fairy tale life, how lucky we are to be so beloved by our Great Democratic Government, the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) has issued an all-points bulletin urging its members to wake up and to urge their U.S. Senators “to oppose the American Health Care Act passed by the House. This harmful bill gives billions of dollars to special interests while sticking ordinary Americans with huge premium hikes. It includes an age tax that would force older Americans to pay thousands of dollars more for their health insurance. It weakens Medicare and removes protections for people with pre-existing conditions. I urge you to represent my interests—not those of the drug and insurance companies.”

The last sentence astounded me. How is it possible that a lobby group for retired people can possibly believe that the House and Senate have any interest in serving the American people?

The House and Senate serve the people who have money, and those people are not the elderly. Thanks to the Federal Reserve, the elderly have not had any interest income on their savings for a decade.

Moreover, thanks to jobs offshoring, the middle class is shrinking, and grandparents are having to support out of their savings both children and grandchildren. Savings are being drawn down and used up. Retired Americans simply do not have the resources to compete in Washington with the pharmaceutical and insurance corporations who are determined to pillage the elderly.

In the USA money resides in the hands of the military/security complex, the Israel Lobby (US taxpayers give the money to them), Wall Street and the Banks Too Big To Fail, real estate and insurance, and environmental polluters such as energy, mining, electricity production, and agribusiness. No one else has any money. Therefore, these interest groups determine U.S. domestic and foreign policy.

The policy of the U.S. government is easy to sum up. It consists of driving the American population into the ground and fomenting war abroad. This is what serves the money interests that control the government.

Democracy does not exist in America. All the bombast you will hear on the 4th is designed to keep you locked in The Matrix.

The talk about “taking back your government” is nonsense. The government doesn’t belong to you. You can’t take it back.

Chris Hedges says that your only alternatives are to overthrow the criminal class in Washington or to accept your slavery.


Related Topics:

Independence Day for Whom*

Judge Calls for U.S. Marshals and FBI to Arrest Congress and the President*

The New Imperial Roman Empire*

Judge Anna Von Reitz on NWO vs. the Rest of Us*

Deep State Takeover of U.S. Succeeded!*

Europe and U.S. Dodging Demands for Slavery Reparations*

U.S. Marshals Biometric Scan Passenger Retinas to Board Flight: “Like Everyone Else, I Complied”*

U.S. Soldiers Share the Truth about What “Fighting For Your Country” Actually Means*

This Company Has Built a Profile on Every American Adult*

Israel Tries to Silence Danish MP*

Israel Tries to Silence Danish MP*

By Zenia Stampe

Zenia Stampe PS: The photo shows me on the outskirts of the Palestinian village of Susiya. Susiya has been demolished by the Israeli military six times and is subject to a standing demolition order. On the horizon, the watchtower of the settlement that Israel says is threatened by the village. Which is why the village is to be demolished. But actually, who is threatening who?


By Zenia Stampe

I don’t often begin a Facebook post with an appeal, but this is an extraordinary situation. This post is long but I hope you will read it. And I hope you will share it.

I am a Danish politician and Member of the Danish Parliament. I have just returned from a week in Israel and Palestine. The trip concluded with a very unusual experience. We were meeting with a political director from the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. He also happens to be the next Ambassador to Denmark. We discussed the situation in the Middle East. But towards the end of the meeting he changed the subject and began attacking Facebook updates I have written in Danish.

It is very unusual for a diplomat to argue with a politician from abroad. It shows how sensitive the Israeli government is to foreign criticism. It also shows that Israelis tend to think they can intimidate critics into silence.

But I will not be silenced. I have seen systematic and deliberate breaches of international law during the last week. I intend to speak out. And now I know the Israeli government is listening.

And that’s why I ask you to read and share my post with your network. For the further it reaches, the more seriously the Israeli government will be forced to address it.

We often hear the Israeli government using “security considerations” to justify their politicies But one thing is now only too clear to me: Israel is making systematic efforts to drive the Palestinians out of large areas of the occupied territories. Israel is in the process of colonizing the areas that were intended to become the Palestinian state. And the word security is a thin layer of varnish applied by Israel to cover that policy.

Let me provide just four examples:

1.      Confiscation of Palestinian houses

Israeli law allows any Jewish Israelis to claim homes where Jews lived before 1948. Note that this is taking place in the occupied territories, not in Israel. This means that an Israeli Jew can knock on the door of a house where a Palestinian family has lived for generations. They can obtain a court order to force the family to move out; the settlers then move in. Most often they put a huge Israeli flag on the roof. And the Israeli military is now obliged to protect the house. So the neighbours suddenly see their street turned into a militarized area. The children play among heavily armed soldiers and checkpoints.

How can this policy benefit Israel’s security in any way?

2.      Settlements

There are currently 600,000 Israeli settlers living in the Palestinian territories, and the number is rising rapidly. According to international law the settlements are illegal. An occupying power must not transfer its own population to occupied territory. But the most critical aspect is not the growth in the number of settlers but the systematic confiscation of Palestinian land, the demolition of Palestinian property, the depletion of natural resources, and the compulsory relocation of Palestinians. These are all breaches of international law, and a de facto colonization of the Palestinians’ country.

This is not just a matter of principle. I have witnessed demolitions. I have spoken to farmers driven off land where they have lived and which they worked for generations. I have seen settlements covering larger and larger areas on the West Bank and in East Jerusalem, with security walls, control towers and huge security zones. If this development continues Palestine will become like a Swiss cheese, where all that is left for the Palestinians is the holes in the cheese. The Palestinians are confined to ghettos in their own country.

How can this in any way be justified by security considerations?
3.      Living Conditions

Palestinians in large areas of the West Bank must submit applications in Israel to extend their homes, dig wells, etc. But their applications are systematically rejected. They find water supplies get cut off and electrical installations destroyed by the military. Meanwhile they see the settlements in the area constantly expanding and being given unrestricted access to electricity and water. I have stood on a road where the Palestinians on one side of the road only had a little water, while the settlers on the other side of the road had all the water they needed. It is not just a problem for individual families and businesses forced to cope with very limited resources. This is also a huge obstacle to the Palestinian economy because it impedes the creation of jobs. We visited a farm and a brewery, both of which were very well run and had considerable potential. But when you only have very limited access to water and do not know when it’s going to be cut off, it’s hard to expand production.

What has any of this to do with security?
4.      The security wall

Israel has the right to protect its borders from potential terrorists. This includes the right to build a wall. But Israel’s security wall is not on the Israeli border and it does not separate Israelis from Palestinians. The wall cuts through Palestine and prevents Palestinians from accessing their own farmlands, schools, institutions, hospitals, and jobs. Thousands of Palestinians cross the wall every day but doing so requires permits and hours of waiting in chaotic conditions.

The wall is therefore a clear breach of international law, and it cannot be justified by security considerations. If this were about security, the wall would surely be located along the green line: the internationally recognized border between Israel and Palestine. And why does Israel at least not provide a proper number of operational checkpoints so that Palestinians can cross the wall quickly? Chaotic scenes with thousands of desperate people queuing for hours and hours are normal. It’s sheer harassment.

How can this be of any value in terms of security considerations?

I know many Jews and many Israelis. I understand and respect how centuries of persecution have created a need for security, both in terms of protection from persecution in the many countries where Jews live and in the mere fact that Israel exists as a safe haven. I will stand up for this at all times.

But the Israeli government is pursuing goals that are not about security. They are about a land grab; about taking over the little the Palestinians have left. It is a slow and deliberate displacement of the Palestinians from their own country. This must not go unremarked. We have a duty to criticize it.

I look forward to welcoming the new Israeli ambassador to Denmark. He must know that many Danes follow what is going on in Israel and Palestine. Many of us are gravely concerned. And we are not going to remain silent.

Please share. Thanks!


Related Topics:

Anonymous To Facebook: “For Every Palestinian Account You Ban, We Will Hack an Israeli Website”*

Facebook Collaborating with Israeli Gov’t to Determine What Should Be Censored*

‘Enough is enough’: Norway’s Trade Unions Vote to Boycott Israel over Palestine*

The ‘Jewish National Fund’ and Its Role in Israel Thus Palestine*

When Palestine was 85% Arab, 15% Israeli and U.K. and U.S. Paid the Jews from the Caucasus to Live There*

Palestine to Sue U.K. for the Creation of ‘Israel’*

Israeli Geneticist: Ashkenazi Jews come from Turkey, not Palestine*

72 Percent of Aid to Palestine Ends Up ‘In Israeli Hands*

Abbas Rejected Biden’s New U.S. Peace Initiative, which Makes Palestine Jewish*

Israel Vents Fury with France after Vote to Recognise Palestine*

U.S. and Israel Intimidating U.N. to Fix Israel’s Global Standing*

Above the Law: Israel Denies U.N. Team Entry to Investigate Operation Protective Edge*

Evict 120 Bedouins from their own Land and Build a Trash Dump Instead*

Another Bedouin Community Razed to the Ground, Leave Children without Water in High Temperatures*

Deir Yassin, the Beginning of the Palestinian Holocaust. 1948*

3,000 Year Old Plan – The Real Nakba*

Lord Rothschild Discusses How His Family Created Israel!*