Archives

Toddler Permanently Brain Damaged by a Mystery Combination Vaccination That Her Parent’s Did Not Consent To*

Toddler Permanently Brain Damaged by a Mystery Combination Vaccination That Her Parent’s Did Not Consent To*

Jodie Marchant (centre) with her parents. Jodie became permanently brain-damaged after receiving mystery vaccine-combination without informed consent.

By Christina England

On May 17, 1993, Mr. and Mrs. Marchant took their daughter, Jodie, to the doctor for her 14-month check-up. Jodie was fit and healthy and meeting all her milestones, so her parents agreed for her to be vaccinated with the MMR vaccination, a decision that will haunt them forever. Mr. Marchant explained to us what happened the moment that Jodie received her vaccination:

“Jodie let out a high-pitched scream and appeared to be in a state of shock. Her eyes became vacant as if in a trance and she appeared to lose interest in eating and refused all food and we had to resort to giving her milkshakes. Jodie did not recognize anyone for a long time. Note, in 1997, her then-GP was able to confirm that Jodie was okay prior to vaccination and this confirms the records were available when the GP INSPECTED THEM.

Jodie stopped movement and would sit on the sofa rocking with eyes rolling and stopped talking.”

It appears that instead of receiving the MMR vaccine, as agreed, Jodie received a mystery vaccination, because according to her medical records, she received a combination of the following vaccinations: diphtheria/tetanus (DT), polio, pertussis, and the MMR 11.

I say this because it states very clearly on her vaccination card that these were the vaccinations that were given on the day that Jodie was vaccinated.  However, despite the fact that all of these vaccinations were recorded, her parents have stated that Jodie only received one shot at the time she was vaccinated.

There was also a mention of the Hib vaccination being given, a vaccine against Haemophilus influenza type B.

Furthermore, her parents have stated, that when they entered the doctor’s surgery, they were shocked to discover that the vaccination had been prepared by their doctor in advance.

CHILD HEALTH RECORD — VACC. a IMM. RESULTS

 

Doctors Found Guilty of Mixing Several Vaccines Together in One Syringe

If what her parents are saying is true and Jodie did only receive one shot on the day she was vaccinated, then we need to consider whether or not Jodie’s doctor decided to mix several vaccinations into one syringe without her parents’ knowledge or consent.

1-year-old Jodie Marchant

.

Whilst the majority of us would consider this to be not only unethical but also highly unlikely, remarkably, it is a possibility because, in 2013, the Globe and Mail reported that a paediatrician from Halifax was found guilty of doing the unthinkable.

They reported that:

Dr. William Vitale had a habit of mixing vaccines into a single syringe rather than administering them separately, and as many as 500 children will have to be re-vaccinated.

For example, at a year old, babies receive a four-in-one vaccine – measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella – along with two other vaccines to protect against meningococcal disease and pneumococcal disease. Dr. Vitale told investigators at the Nova Scotia College of Physicians and Surgeons that he mixed the three shots in one syringe to reduce the number of needles children would get.”

What is even more shocking is that this doctor is not alone in his actions. In 2016, the Guardian reported on an equally disturbing story:

“Regulators have suspended the license of a doctor in Chicago who allegedly gave patients modified vaccinations containing cat saliva and vodka.”

They stated:

“After hearing complaints from health care providers that children were getting unapproved oral versions of childhood shots from Dr. Ming Te Lin, investigators visited Lin’s practice.

They found a cluttered, unsterile office and ‘a box filled with vials and tubes that [Lin] was using to make his own vaccinations.’”

They continued:

“Lin told investigators he had been preparing alternative vaccinations for children for more than a decade, according to the order.

Despite his unapproved methods, Lin is accused of signing state forms certifying he had given paediatric patients their conventional shots. Charts showed the patients who received unapproved oral vaccines included a seven-day-old infant.”

In fact, reports such as these are not as rare as we might imagine. During a now-censored YouTube video, the developer of Merck’s vaccine program, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, was filmed openly admitting that whilst working for Merck, the polio vaccines had been deliberately contaminated with SV40, a cancer-causing monkey virus from 1953-1963.

Although the original clip was censored, other copies are still in existence.

See: Dr. Maurice Hilleman, developer of Merck’s vaccine program, explains why Merck’s vaccines have spread AIDS & other plagues worldwide

Do We Actually Know What Our Doctors Are Vaccinating Us With?

In 2015, VacTruth reported on the story of Alisa Neathery, a mother who took her six-month-old unvaccinated baby, Bently, to the doctor to be examined for the first time. However, instead of treating Alisa with respect, the medical personnel emotionally blackmailed her into having her baby vaccinated with a lethal combination of 13 vaccines.

Alisa explained that:

“Prior to the shots being given, when the doctor was discussing the pros of getting vaccinated with me, he explained how he was from a village in Africa. That we were lucky in America to have the opportunity to receive vaccines because where he was from, the mothers had to have like 11 kids each since most would die off from disease because they were not as fortunate to receive vaccines like we are here in America. He really pushed them on me hard. He spent a lot of time convincing me to give Bently the vaccines, but when it was done, we never saw the doctor again.”

The report stated that:

Bently’s doctor decided to vaccinate this previously unvaccinated baby with a total of 13 vaccinations in one day, in what can only be described as a bid to catch up.

The vaccinations included:

  • Two doses of the DTaP – diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine
  • Hib – Haemophilus influenza type B vaccine
  • IPV- inactivated polio vaccine
  • Pneumococcal vaccine
  • Three doses of oral rotavirus vaccine

VacTruth reported that:

“Bently was also given three other vaccinations, which appear to be unidentified on his vaccination card, plus the hepatitis B vaccine and oral polio vaccine.

Little Bently died in his mother’s arms just five days later.”

For further information on this story, read: Six-Month-Old Baby Dies Just Five Days After Receiving 13 Vaccines.

Jodie’s Parents Had Only Consented to the MMR Vaccine

Jodie is now 25 years of age; she has no language, is doubly incontinent, still drinks from a bottle and suffers from a variety of disabilities similar to autism. Her parents have received no apologies, no compensation and no help for their disabled daughter. They believe that their case hinges on the following facts:

  1. They did not give their consent for her to receive any vaccine other than the MMR.
  2. They did not have sufficient information on this vaccination to make an informed choice on whether or not they wanted their daughter vaccinated with anything other than the MMR, which, according to the Montgomery Ruling, they must receive in full.
  3. By vaccinating Jodie with multiple vaccinations without her parents’ consent or knowledge, her doctor committed an offense which was a breach of both Jodie’s and her parents’ human rights.

I have met this family and have received their paperwork and I found the reports to be full of inconsistencies.

For example, a report referenced as JGB01/JGB01/213223, dated May 6, 2016, stated:

As you can see, each one of these statements states something entirely different and these inconsistencies continued throughout the paperwork.

 

Although the report did ascertain that Jodie suffered from autism, the report then stated she was not eligible for compensation from the Vaccine Damage Payment Unit, because after reading the medical evidence, it was not accepted that Jodie had been damaged by the vaccination. However, Mr. Marchant believes that this is not the case and his views were reiterated by Dr. Warner. from Southampton, who stated:

Letter from Professor J Warner, Southampton

 

Jodie is one of the most disabled adults I have met and this family has been left penniless and alone to cope. This case is even more tragic when you see the photos and reports of Jodie before she was vaccinated. Jodie was a healthy normal little girl who before vaccination was meeting all of her milestones.

In fact, her general practitioner, Dr. Jennifer Greenland, stated this in a letter addressed to Dr. Andrew Wakefield and his team. The letter stated:

“Her diagnosis of autism was confirmed in May 1996 after a full assessment.”

Her words were repeated by Dr. Walker-Smith’s return letter, which stated:

“…then she stopped eating, started screaming and lost what words she had.”

Several Reports Stated that Jodie is Vaccine-Injured

In a draft report, titled Appendix A, Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM, wrote the following statement:

Throughout his report, he makes it clear that, in his professional medical opinion, Jodie’s injuries were caused by the vaccinations that she had received.

Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM wrote: “Jodie’s serious handicaps are causally related to vaccination.”

He continued his report by stating that in 2002, he was appointed as the Expert Medical Witness, by a firm of solicitors in an MMR litigation, and explained that the case involved approximately 1,200 vaccine-damaged children. However, the case was terminated by the Legal Services Commission (LSC) on the grounds that legal success for the claimants was unlikely.

Since then, he has witnessed literally hundreds of more cases and has been able to establish a clear clinical picture of seriously handicapped children. He explained that the list of injuries that he had witnessed was endless and he presented the list in full:

Provided by Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM.

As you can see, this list is extremely extensive. Furthermore, Dr. Fletcher continued his report by stating that:

Statement by Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM.

With this information in mind, it is difficult to understand why Jodie’s case was dismissed. Especially when you consider the fact that Jodie suffers nearly every one of the conditions that were listed.

Statement by Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM.

In his summary, Dr. Fletcher stated:

“Evidence fully supports Jodie’s normal medical history prior to this administration of vaccines.”

What makes the whole situation even worse is the fact that Dr. Fletcher was not the only professional to submit a report stating that Jodie was vaccine-damaged. However, despite the overwhelming evidence presented to the Vaccine Damage Payment Unit (VDPU) and the fact that no consent was given for Jodie to receive multiple vaccinations, this family has been left alone to struggle.

Maybe the reason for this can be found in a letter written by the senior case manager for the Legal Services Commission, Mr. John Baker.

Mr. Baker wrote:

Written by Mr. Baker.

(Note: MPA is the abbreviation for Multi-People Action.)

To which, Mr. Miller replied with the following statement, in an email to Mr. Baker:

Written by Mr. Miller.

This is probably the single most damning statement written by any of these professionals because he went on to state the following information in a letter to Mr. Baker:

“Upon first considering our comprehensive letter of instruction, Dr. Geier confirmed that it may prove impossible to consider the combined effects of the alleged mixture of vaccines. There would be no documented study of how such a combination would react within a human body as it has never been accepted that it is appropriate to mix such vaccines together, such vaccines are already mixed by their manufacturers in a manner which is considered to be appropriate and safe for provision at the time. It is, therefore, clear that the original instruction of Dr. Geier has been unfulfilled as it seemed impossible to obtain appropriate evidence as to how such vaccines would have reacted together and reacted upon Jodie Marchant’s body.”

This was followed by another letter which stated:

Written by Mr. Miller.

Mr. Miller is absolutely spot-on with his account of this case because no consent was ever given for Jodie to receive a single syringe containing a mixture of several vaccines. Mr. Marchant stated:

“The lack of consent should have been the obvious route to take. If it had been taken by our Legal Reps our case would have finished years ago. To ignore our consent refusal is criminal and an indication of the limits doctors will go to obtain their bonuses.”

It is for these reasons that Mr. Marchant has decided to represent his daughter himself, with or without legal representation. He has told Health Impact News that he believes that it is about time that the doctor who vaccinated his daughter is held accountable for her actions.

Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm

eBook – Available for immediate download

 

Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who stood up against big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the Earth.

Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.

Because of the strong opposition from big pharma concerning Dr. Moulden’s research, we became concerned that the name of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from the internet. His reputation was being disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone. This book summarizes his teaching and is a must-read for everyone who wants to learn the “other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors.

Source*

Related Topics:

WHO Admitted Smallpox Vaccine Caused AIDS after Requesting It*

13 Year-Old Boy Permanently Disabled from Chicken Pox Vaccine Wins his Case in Vaccine Court*

Why You Should NEVER Sign ‘Refusal to Vaccinate’ Document*

Vaccine Induced Chronic Fatigue Syndrome*

Triplets Regress into Autism Following Flu Vaccine*

Polio Vaccine Refusal Cases among Well-educated People Baffle Officials in Pakistan*

Norwegian Study Links Flu Vaccine to Narcolepsy Risk*

Varicella Occurring From Chickenpox Vaccination*

H.R. 1313 Bill Would Require Medical Procedures Like Vaccines as Requirement for Employment*

DTP Vaccine Associated With 212% Increased Infant Mortality Risk*

Lab Report Analysis Found Round Up in MMR Vaccine*

Australian Prime Minister and Wife Tied to Pharma, Pushing Mandatory Vaccination*

Human Trafficker Admits To Killing Over 400 Children in Video Confession*

Human Trafficker Admits To Killing Over 400 Children in Video Confession*

 

Slavery may be deemed a historical term in many societies at this point, but it’s certainly not a thing of the past. Human trafficking, for instance, produces hundreds of billions of dollars in profit by trapping millions of people in unfathomable situations around the world. Human traffickers resort to violence, threats, deception, debt bondage, and other forms of manipulation to force people to take part in commercial sex or other services against their consent.

According to the International Labour Organization, there are an estimated  20.9 million victims of human trafficking globally, with 68% of them trapped in forced labour, 26% being children, and 55% being women and girls. The organization also estimates that forced labour and human trafficking is a $150 billion industry worldwide.

It’s unlikely you’ll hear of a human trafficker coming forward about their crime, but recently, one has done just that, going on the record and confessing during a filmed interview that he sold thousands of children into sex slavery and killed hundreds who he wasn’t able to sell off.

Ross Kemp, a British investigative journalist, was able to get a hold of the child trafficker for an interview. Kemp is an award-winning journalist known for his raw documentary making that exposes situations many others would fear.

According to the child trafficker, he admits to losing count of just how many young girls he killed. However, he estimates that it’s “somewhere between 400 and 500.”

In the interview, it seems clear Kemp displays immense discomfort and uncontrollable emotional unease as he sits face-to-face with the man, who admits to essentially dehumanizing so many innocent children, even killing hundreds of them.

Of the interview, Kemp revealed he had to fight back tears, saying he was “shocked” and “horrified” by the serial killer’s words. He said,

“interviewing a guy who admits to killing 400 to 500 kids but doesn’t know exactly how many – that did make me cry.”

The trafficker, “Mr. Kahn,” hits Kemp with extreme confessions that would make even the most fearless journalist, never mind any bystander, squirm in their seat. Kahn revealed he had “trafficked three or four thousand” young girls, or perhaps even more. With such a revelation, Kemp goes on to ask the human trafficker if he sold girls as young as nine for sex. The man admitted to selling girls who are 12.

As for whether he ever returned children, Kahn said no. Rather, he simply killed them.

Kahn said, “If they try to run away, or if there’s any trouble selling them, they are killed and buried.”

Kahn even convinced young girls he would marry them.

At the time of the interview, Kahn had 75 traffickers working for him, and was currently being investigated for over 25 different offenses, though he has never been tried for any of his crimes. He had been trafficking for seven years.

“We go to poor communities, often Muslim or tribal, and look for real beauties,” Kahn said of what he looks for in a victim.

“The girls are auctioned, and go to the highest bidder.”

The full interview, below, may present some disturbing facts, but it’s the awareness that’s needed regarding the awful crimes.

Source*

Related Topics:

Doctors Tell How Sex Traffickers are Implanting Microchips in Children*

Feds Make Record Gains On Human Trafficking As Global Networks are Broken Up*

42 Arrested in Tennessee Sex Trafficking Operation*

Flight Attendant Saves Girl from Human Trafficking*

The Clinton-Silsby Trafficking Scandal and the Media Cover-Up*

Planned Parenthood was Caught Covering up Child Sex Trafficking*

One Man Helped to Rescue 6,000 Sex Trafficking Victims*

How Social and Popular Media is Desensitising our Youth*

How Social and Popular Media is Desensitising our Youth*

By Muntadhir Abbas

As we plunge deeper into a world full of innovation in technological entertainment and social media frenzies, I have recently found myself seriously questioning the effects many of these platforms are having on our youth, as well the naivety of parents in this fast-paced and ever changing society we live in. Don’t get me wrong, there are numerous advantages to so many new and diverse sources of communication and entertainment. However, we are often blind to the risks they pose to children and adolescents.

In this, the first of two articles exploring the main social issues that stem from mediums such as TV, music, social media and console games, I hope to simply provide an insight into the reality of the effects of such media, coupled with my observations as a secondary/high school teacher.

It was the last day of term before Easter holiday, in particular, that prompted me to write this, as well as the exclusion from school of several Muslim children so far this academic year. Please note, I really don’t care whether children are Muslim are not, as I believe the welfare of EVERY child is important and the points I hope to raise apply to all demographics of society.

As it was the last lesson, deemed to be a ‘fun lesson’, I allowed the children, who are thirteen going on fourteen, to ‘chill on their phones’ as long as they didn’t use social media – the root of all disputes these days (a topic best discussed another time).

As I marked books, I noticed near on silence. When questioned, pupils almost unanimously said they were watching Netflix on their phone. Perhaps trusting my better judgement and not originally allowing them to use their phones would’ve been wiser, but now I was curious and felt the need to discuss things further. I asked about the phones they had, the contract they were on, who pays for bills, whether it was their own Netflix subscription, what they watch and so on. To my astonishment – and I’m still young and with the times – almost all pupils had the latest smartphone, with a fully paid contract, their own Netflix subscription and were free to watch whatever they wanted without any parental control. They were even viewing series that I watch – like Narcos, House of Cards and Top Boy – all of which have scenes I feel the need to skip! Furthermore, one of the girls said she was going to watch the infamous film 50 Shades of Grey film over the weekend. It was at this point that they could all see the concern and shock on my face, so we discussed things a little further. After some very tactful questions and reasoning on my part, the children – of various ethnicities and religions – all agreed and concluded that they are bombarded with so many scenes of violence, sex, drug and alcohol abuse that many of these social vices just aren’t, for lack of a better word, an ‘issue’ these days. Whilst I almost felt old fashioned, I think what really hit me was the acceptance and desensitisation that existed within these naive and somewhat vulnerable children – and they are just that, children!

“Do not follow that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed! The hearing, the sight and the heart — about each of these you will be questioned.” (Quran 17:36)

A study carried out by Dr. Steve Martino in 2013, published by research organisation RAND, discovered the following in relation to the links between media and psychosocial issues:

The more sexual content that kids see on television, the earlier they initiate sexual activity, the more likely they are to regret their early sexual experiences, and the more likely they are to have an unplanned teen pregnancy.

– There is a strong casual connection between youth exposure to violence in the media and violent or aggressive behaviour and thoughts.

– Kids are exposed to nearly 300 alcohol commercials per year. Similarly, more than 80% of movies depict alcohol use.

– The motives movie characters convey for smoking can adversely affect adolescents’ real-world smoking risk.

Furthermore, a study in 2005 by the notable pressure group the Keiser Family Foundation found the following in an intense survey:

– In 2005 there were 3,783 (sexual related) scenes in a 1,000-hour sample, compared with 1,930 in 1998.

– It found that 70% of shows had sexual content, ranging from a sexual reference to full depiction, with five sex-related scenes per hour on average.

As responsible adults, whether you are a parent or not, and whether you are religious or not, you don’t even need the studies above to tell you that there are real and alarming links between the mediums children and adolescents interact with and the types of behavioural and social issues they manifest.

To be blunt, consider the following areas of entertainment and their possible vices, remembering that everything about them is not bad, but if left unchecked, our youth are vulnerable.

TV and Films

With so many more scenes of violence, sex, nudity, substance abuse and gore, even during family hours (traditionally 7-9pm), we need to censor what is appropriate for youngsters to watch. The people they watch will often become a source of emulation, and if that is a drug dealer or a beautified popular cheerleader (forgive the clichés) then their perception of reality and aspiration in life will be warped. To give a better idea of how sexual activity has changed over time, a fact sheet released in 2011 by the Family Planning Association, found that the average age of sexual intercourse for both men and women was 16. This is down from 17 years of age from a similar study carried out a decade earlier.

“And the right of your sight is that you lower it before everything which is unlawful to you. And that you abandon using it except in situations in which you can take heed in such a way that you gain insight or acquire knowledge by it. Indeed the sight is the gateway to reflection.” – A Treatise of Rights; The Right of the Eye (Ali ibn Hussain as-Sajjad)

Music

Aside from the traditional view of music being impermissible (haram) in Islam (and that debate is well outside the scope of this article) generally certain types of music are seen to be detrimental to society. In some cases they stereotype specific cultures and result in self-fulfilling prophecies of gang culture and substance abuse, and in other cases the raw sexual content is alarming especially when the age of the listeners are as young as five. For example, in 2008, the song ‘I Kissed A Girl’ by Kate Perry was number one in the U.K. charts for several weeks, with children of all ages buying the single and singing the lyrics. The song was in reference to a lesbian experience, which the singer romanticised and soon gained fame for doing so. Again, the discussion on homosexuality is for another time, but the point is, we need to pay attention to what children are listening to. Other genres consist of constant references to drug abuse, womanising and gang culture, and yet have become so popular amongst teenage boys in particular. And these mainstream themes show no sign of abating.

And the right of hearing is to keep it pure by not making it the direct pathway to your heart, except for noble words that establish some good in your heart or grant you a noble trait. Indeed hearing is the gateway through which various concepts reach the heart —whether good or evil. And there is no power but in God. – A Treatise of Rights; The Right of the Ear (Ali ibn Hussain as-Sajjad)

Video Games

No-one needs to be told how popular one particular video game is, but the statistics are scary. In late 2013 for example, when Grand Theft Auto (GTA) V was released, it took three days for it to generate over one billion dollars in sales, making it the fastest selling entertainment product in history. This game is filled with violence, seeking gamers to use torture tactics, featuring grotesque depictions of women and general bad taste. Yet, the sales figures don’t lie, and youngsters across the globe are hooked to a game which simply numbs emotion towards what are very serious and sensitive issues in the world we live in.

Social media

Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram, Tinder, Twitter…the list goes on. All these innovative social media platforms, some of which have fantastic uses, are also places of much controversy. From child sexual grooming to radicalisation, there is a plethora of issues that arise from social media platforms. On a more day to day basis, children are using these sites and apps to express emotions in very unhealthy ways. This also extends to it being a major source of e-bullying, and the unmonitored sexual freedoms that exist online. From my experience in dealing with teenagers and social media, there are far too many conflicts that emanate as a result of irresponsible use of social media. The vast amount of freedom teenagers have been afforded both by parents and the owners of social media has resulted in unprecedented exchanges of sexualised images. From pouting poses to ‘nudes’ (pictures of one’s self posing fully or partially nude), many girls, in particular, face increasing pressure to post revealing and risqué pictures of themselves. Coupled with sexualised advertising that bombards children on a daily basis, there is an alarming risk that children are interacting with sexual issue they can’t fully comprehend, and far too young an age. Social media ‘celebrities’ all too often romanticise a hedonistic, narcissistic lifestyle, setting concerning ideals for our youngest generation.

Tell the believing men to lower their gaze, and protect their private parts. That is purer for them. Verily, Allah is All- Aware of what they do. And tell the believing women to lower their gaze, and protect their private parts and not to show off their adornment… (Quran 24:30-31)

1700 words of (unintentional) scaremongering later, it is my belief parents, carers, children, community members and society in general need to take a long hard look at the influence entertainment is having on our youth. As I have said, there are many advantages and developments that stem from these innovations, but we need to be mindful about the holistic effects they are having. As I once heard a scholar say, “a knife can be used to cut an orange or to inflict harm”, and if we responsibly nurture our youth, we will most certainly see the fruits in the future.

As for practical ways in which I believe we can nurture, safeguard and nourish children at various ages, I will be including them part 2 of this series.

And verily God is the all-Knowing.

Source*

Related Topics:

Why I Don’t Have Facebook or a Smartphone

How Facebook gives the U.S. Govt Access to your Profile Data*

WhatsApp and Facebook Data Sharing*

Your Facebook, Twitter and blog are about to be monitored for references to the Government

Can You Be Detained Over Facebook!

There Were 88 Media Companies… Now There Are 6 which get their News from Rothschild*

Five Times Western Media Failed to Call White Shooters Terrorists*

Taking Control of Your Family Home

WiFi — an Invisible Threat to all Life*

‘Digital Dementia’ Puts Half the Brain to Sleep … permanently!*

NYPD Boss Jailed For 28 Years by Elite Pedophile Ring Investigators*

NYPD Boss Jailed For 28 Years by Elite Pedophile Ring Investigators*

By Baxter Dmitry

Alberto Randazzo, a former New York City Police Department boss, was sentenced to 28 years in prison for sexual exploitation of children and receipt of child pornography, as the Trump administration’s investigation into the elite pedophile ring that has infiltrated politics and law enforcement nationwide continues taking down high-profile perpetrators.

Randazzo was caught targeting mothers, persuading them to sexually abuse their children and send him pictures and videos of the acts.

The federal investigation into the elite paedophile ring is moving full steam ahead and heavy hitters have been employed to lead prosecutions. Randazzo’s sentence was announced by Bridget M. Rohde, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Angel M. Melendez, Special Agent-in-Charge, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), New York, and James P. O’Neill, Commissioner, New York City Police Department (NYPD).

Alberto Randazzo lived a double life, publicly serving as an NYPD police officer while privately engaging in conduct to exploit the most vulnerable members of the community – our children,” stated Acting United States Attorney Rohde.

Together with our law enforcement partners we will continue to strive to protect the most vulnerable among us.”  

Special Agent-in-Charge Melendez said the days of elite paedophiles getting away with their heinous crimes because of their positions in society are officially over.

“Randazzo held a position with the sole purpose to serve and protect the people of this city. Instead, he targeted certain women, persuaded them to sexually abuse their children and had them send him pictures and videos of the acts,” said Special Agent-in-Charge Melendez.

His behavior is no less than deplorable. It is with continued joint law enforcement efforts that we can target these types of offenders and ensure that they are punished for their heinous deeds.”

After the conviction, Police Commissioner James P. O’Neill took the opportunity to deliver a shout out to Trump’s team of elite paedophile ring busters.

“Alberto Randazzo’s exploitation of innocent children is unconscionable. I am grateful to our detectives in Internal Affairs, Homeland Security, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of New York for their work in bringing Randazzo to justice for these horrific crimes,” said O’Neill.

According to the Department of Justice: On July 12, 2016, the defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to sexually exploit a child and one count of receipt of child pornography.  According to court filings, from as early as 2010 through 2013, Randazzo targeted women through websites such as Ashley Madison and Match.com and persuaded them to sexually abuse children to whom they had access, so he could watch the abuse.

Randazzo was caught in February 2013, when a witness found disturbing text messages on Randazzo’s phone and uncovered emails from women sending Randazzo pictures of them molesting their children.  When the witness confronted him, Randazzo admitted his sexual interest in mothers having sex with their children.

[First Democrat Official Tied To Elite Pedophile Ring Pleads Guilty]

At sentencing the government presented evidence that at least five women complied with Randazzo’s solicitations and sexually abused children in order to satisfy his sexual desires.  Randazzo’s victims ranged in age from a few months to eight years old, and he traveled out of state to watch two of them be molested in person.  Randazzo arranged to have the eight-year-old victim drugged so that he would not remember the abuse.

Three of the women Randazzo solicited have also been charged in the Eastern District of New York. Two have pleaded guilty, one of whom was sentenced to five years imprisonment, one of whom is awaiting sentencing, and another is awaiting trial.

Source*

Related Topics:

Attorney Suing Elite Paedophile Ring Shot Dead*

Washington Paedophile Epidemic So Bad Police Tell Children to Stay Indoors*

Paedophiles in Australia’s Catholic Church Abused 4,445 Children, Pays US$213mn to Victims as Compensation*

Dutch Media Cancels Dr. Phil Show after Exposing Elite Paedophilia Ring*

U.K. Paedophile Epidemic So Big Police Ask Vigilante Group to Takeover*

Citizens Fight Back, Move to Impeach Judge for Letting Paedophile Cop Off Easy*

nothing short of the nation’s first paedophile protection act’*

Children in Scotland Murdered in Paedophile Snuff Movies*

Army Colonel Sobs in Court as he’s Sentenced to 12 years in Child Pornography Case*

My Kid Is Reading What? Common Core or Pornography?*

Nearly 400 Children Rescued and 348 Adults Arrested in Canadian Child Pornography Bust*

Pornography and the Social Engineering of Human Sexuality*

Former Dyncorp VP Charged With Rape Of a Minor*

 

U.S. Embassy in London Insists on Interviewing Three Month Old Terror Suspect for Visa*

U.S. Embassy in London Insists on Interviewing Three Month Old Terror Suspect for Visa*

By Jim W. Dean

Tiny Baby’s Terrorism Interview Makes US Embassy Laughing Stock of the Internet

“You just can’t make stuff like this up” – Jim W. Dean

[Editor’s Note: This boggles the mind in its stupidity; that no one in the U.S. Embassy system wanted to draw attention to themselves by interfering in standard procedures. So a 3-month-old baby had to be brought down to London to be “interviewed” about poor grandpa mistakenly checking ‘yes’ instead of ‘no’ on the baby’s travel visa form about engaging in terrorism.

Sometimes our hunting down bad government is a long drawn out process of digging into dirty laundry to find what has been hidden there. But I chose this for publication for its wonderful simplicity.

We live in the age of computer processing and accountability of mid-level administration people being monitored by software for efficiency and the proper following of procedures. But what this case shows you is how easily the human common sense part of good admin work can totally disappear from the process.

And, if a simple situation like this got handled so badly, we have to ask ourselves, how many others that we don’t know about have been also, but over much more important issues… Jim W. Dean ]

U.S. Embassy in London

 

The U.S. embassy in London has become the butt of internet jokes after staff there interviewed a three-month-old baby on suspicion of terrorism. Young Harvey Kenyon-Cairns had been due to fly to Orlando, Florida with his parents and grandparents. His grandfather Paul Kenyon filled out his ESTA visa waiver application form, but made a mistake.

When he got the question of the form which asks, “Do you seek to engage in or have you ever engaged in terrorist activities, espionage, sabotage, or genocide?” Kenyon ticked yes instead of no.

As a result, Harvey, his mother Kaye and his grandfather Paul traveled with him on a ten-hour round trip from their home in Poynton, Cheshire, to the embassy in London’s Grosvenor Square.

Harvey, who isn’t talking yet, passed the interview and was eventually given permission to travel to the U.S. However, he wasn’t given the all-clear in time to travel with the rest of the family and Kenyon ended up having to pay an extra £3,000 ($3,767) to re-book tickets for Harvey and his parents.

Hearing about Harvey’s story, users of social networks were astonished that the embassy required him to visit in person for the interview, despite being aware that he is just three months old and obviously incapable of terrorism.

His grandfather joked that Harvey “has sabotaged quite a few nappies in his time.”

​​​”Baby Harvey was good as gold for the interview and never cried once. I thought about taking him along in an orange jumpsuit, but thought better of it,” Kenyon told the Guardian.

Others agreed with a point made by the child’s grandfather Paul Kenyon and criticized the inclusion of a question asking whether the visitor had ever engaged in terrorism.

“If you were a terrorist, I suspect you’d not be ticking yes on the ESTA form anyway,” the baby’s grandfather added.

Source*

Related Topics:

First U.S. Female Muslim Judge Found Dead in Hudson River*

Police Hold Children at Gunpoint in Muslim House Raid*

New Settlement Aims to Protect Muslims from Discriminatory NYPD Surveillance*

Why is the Holiest Shrine in Christianity Guarded by Two Muslim Families?*

U.S. Bans Most Electronic Devices on Flights from 8 Muslim Countries*

Jury Convicts Former Congressional Candidate Robert Doggart for Plot to Attack Muslim Community*

Homeless Eat Free at Muslim-Owned Restaurant In Washington, D.C.

Muslim Postmaster Saves Elderly Customer after Foiling MoneyGram Scam*

U.K Gov’t Announces its own ‘Muslim ban’*

Jews give Muslims Key to their Synagogue after Town’s Mosque Burns Down*

Muslim Schoolboy Rejects £5mn from American Investors for Money-Saving Website*

Blackburn Muslim Schools Come Top of U.K. Education Progress Table*

Muslims in Florida Open Free Health Clinic for the Poor and Uninsured*

Why You Should NEVER Sign ‘Refusal to Vaccinate’ Document*

Why You Should NEVER Sign ‘Refusal to Vaccinate’ Document*

THE REFUSAL TO VACCINATE DOCUMENT

The Refusal to Vaccinate document was created by the CDC or the American Academy of Paediatrics ‘legal department’ as a response to the growing number of toxic vaccines recommended by them and the growing number of parents who are becoming educated on this issue. According to CDC recommendations, our children should now receive 37 doses of vaccines between 0-16 years. [See Vaccine Schedule]

This document, now being used to overcome vaccine awareness, is the most diabolical strategy possible! It is unlikely that physicians have any idea what they are asking their patients to sign . . . or to sign away. It is essentially a signed confession. So please read and understand why no one should sign it and why it is really something other than what it appears to be.

TWELVE REASONS YOU CANNOT SIGN REFUSAL TO VACCINATE

Here are 12 reasons why no parent can sign this document unless they are interested in being statutorily charged with neglect or intentionally causing harm. Repeating more boldly: this document, if signed, could be used to have your child(ren) removed from your custody! It was created to stand up in court, which is why they require the parent’s signature to be “witnessed”?

#1
The document attaches a child ID # that will be identifiable in the electronic records system across the country. Everyone from the school to the NSA will be able to determine who is and who is not vaccinated.

#2
The scientific term for HPV vaccine is listed to discourage parents from making the connection to the dangerous vaccine for HPV called Gardasil. [See Gardasil: Former Merck Doctor predicts greatest medical scandal of all time]

#3
Establishing a vaccination history is part of the Police state registry system being set up to track your vaccination status.

#4
The CDC Vaccine Information Statement is pure unadulterated propaganda. The vaccination information coverup was documented and exposed in an extremely important paper Health Hazards of Disease Prevention (2011). Also see info about the CDC – #9 (below).

#5
Again the parent is misled to think the truth about vaccine risks is on the CDC web site.The doctor has the vaccine package inserts right in his/her office. Why is it not offered and explained to the parent? The physicians themselves may or may not have read them. However, physicians are certainly aware that if the parents read the ‘official risks’ put out by the drug corporations, they would refuse the vaccines. Full disclosure is almost NEVER a part of the process.

#6
“I understand the following: The risks and benefits of the recommended vaccine(s).”

This of course would be agreeing to a false statement. You cannot understand the risks without reading and understanding the package inserts, therefore how can you answer in the affirmative? And what about all of the vaccine facts that aren’t even listed in the package inserts that have been ‘covered up’ for many years?

#7
Parents are falsely told that without vaccines their children could suffer dire illnesses but are not told the dire illnesses/injuries the vaccines themselves could cause . . . including death.

#8
This refers to the “herd immunity myth” of 1933, which has been proven unscientific over and over and over again. Simply put: if other children have been vaccinated – and the vaccines work – they won’t contract a disease from your child.

#9
Entities are listed as “strongly recommending” the vaccine schedule. Again however, parents are NOT given full disclosure as to exactly who/what the entities are and what their motivations might be. Listed on the Refusal to Vaccinate document are the following entities and a brief description of their motivation:

  • The ‘physician’ – is rewarded for administering vaccines by higher reimbursements for his fees. His vaccine “rates” are checked to determine whether or not he/she is entitled to more money. Physicians, public health workers, and drug companies have all been given immunity from any possible lawsuits that may arise as a result of vaccine-caused injury or illness. In other words, if a vaccine harms your child or causes autism you cannot sue any of them. They all have a liability exemption.
  • The American Academy of Paediatrics which is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF ILLINOIS – that receives lots of money from drug corporations for advertising in their journal, etc. This organization relies heavily on what they falsely believe to be a “government” health advocacy agency known as the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
  • The American Academy of Family Physicians which is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF KANSAS – that also receives lots of money from drug corporations for advertising in their journal, etc. This organization also relies heavily on what they falsely believe to be a “government” health advocacy agency known as the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
  • The Center for Disease Control (CDC) which is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF GEORGIA. The CDC IS NOT PART OF A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT. Repeat: the CDC IS NOT PART OF A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT! It is a private for-profit corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet that is chartered under the umbrella of the private for-profit UNITED STATES corporation with extremely close ties to the pharmaceutical companies and a sordid history of corruption. [See: CDC Exposed]

Bottom line: all of the above “entities” make more money if they vaccinate our children and even more if our children get sick from the vaccines . . . including the paediatricians themselves.

#10
This is the broadest and most nefarious part of this document.

“Nevertheless, I have decided at this time to decline . . . I know that failure to follow the recommendations about vaccination may endanger the health or life of my child and others . . . I therefore agree to tell all health care professionals in all settings what vaccines my child has not received because he or she may need to be isolated or may require immediate medical evaluation and tests that might not be necessary if my child had been vaccinated.”

This is not only deceptive and untruthful [see numbers 2-8] it is asking you to confess that you know you are harming your child (and others) and don’t care. It is asking you to agree to inform any/all people who represent themselves as healthcare “professionals” (not defined) of your child’s vaccination record. You are also consenting to allow undefined healthcare professionals to remove your son or daughter from your care and place him or her in isolation for unproven or unknown exposure to a myriad of undefined communicable diseases – with or without testing.

#11
This is an admission that you understand this contractual document – and its significance – ‘in its entirety’. This means that you accept the false information sited as factual, chose NOT to do what you now know to be good for your child and others (are negligent), obligate yourself to embarrass and confuse your child by tracking and reporting on the vaccines you protected your child from, and give permission for your child to be tested or removed from your care and put in isolation for any ‘supposed’ exposure to any ‘undefined’ communicable disease by anyone calling themselves a healthcare worker. [Ohio Revised Code 3701.13]

In short, the form wants you to attest to the following . . . in writing and in the presence of a witness:

  • You understand you are signing a contract with performance requirements
  • You accept false information as factual and don’t care
  • You don’t care if your child or others are harmed by your decision
  • You agree to volunteer to all pretend healthcare workers your child’s vaccine record
  • You agree to allow others to test and/or isolate your child for unproven exposure to a disease

#12
Here is the kicker. As you are asked to sign, initial and date this document in front of a witness, should a custody dispute ever arise (either between parents or with Child Protective Services) this document could be used against the mother or father that signed it.

In defense of physicians, they have been told – via the instructions accompanying the Refusal to Vaccinate document – that parents could sue them should their sons or daughters come down with any of the diseases vaccines are supposed to prevent. Their fear of being sued is why physicians are so insistent that parents sign the Refusal to Vaccinate document.  An excellent alternative, for both physician and parent, is the Vaccination Notice.  This notice corrects misconceptions about vaccines, the herd immunity myth, and the CDC. It also brings the liability (or lack thereof) to the physicians attention. See The Vaccination Notice.

Source*

Related Topics:

Vaccine Induced Chronic Fatigue Syndrome*

How One Father Told His Paediatrician “No” to Vaccines*

Death from Vaccinosis and an Imprisoned Father*

H.R. 1313 Bill Would Require Medical Procedures Like Vaccines as Requirement for Employment*

Triplets Regress into Autism Following Flu Vaccine*

Polio Vaccine Refusal Cases among Well-educated People Baffle Officials in Pakistan*

Norwegian Study Links Flu Vaccine to Narcolepsy Risk*

Varicella Occurring From Chickenpox Vaccination*

DTP Vaccine Associated With 212% Increased Infant Mortality Risk*

Lab Report Analysis Found Round Up in MMR Vaccine*

Former Dyncorp VP Charged With Rape Of a Minor*

Former Dyncorp VP Charged With Rape Of a Minor*

On Friday, April 14th, the Military District of Washington announced that General James Grazioplene (Ret.) was being charged with six specifications of rape of a minor on multiple occasions between 1983 and 1989. The Army said that the investigation remains open.

There were no further details released about the case and it is unclear why the charges are only now being brought against Mr. Grazioplene. NY Daily News reported that Grazioplene retired in 2005 after serving as the director of force development in the Pentagon’s Joint Warfighting Capabilities Assessment. Grazioplene’s Linkedin page revealed that he served as the Vice President of Dyncorp from 2012 to 2015. He also acted as the CEO for Mission Readiness LLC, a joint venture run by private military groups DynCorp International, Force Protection Industries, Oshkosh Defense and McLane Advanced Technologies which worked to provide U.S. and Coalition forces with vehicle maintenance in Afghanistan, Iraq and Kuwait.

The conviction of their former Vice President is the latest in a string of sexual misconduct cases that have plagued Dyncorp over the years. Disobedient Media has previously highlighted a number of these incidents, including scandals in Afghanistan and the Balkans, where Dyncorp employees actively facilitated abuse of minors and even worked with organized crime groups to engage in human trafficking.

Source*

Related Topics:

Dyncorp, the Private Military Corporation at the Heart of U.S. Foreign Policy Scandal*

Over 100 U.N. Peacekeepers ran a Child Sex Ring in Haiti, and were never Jailed*

More Paedophiles Exposed Amongst U.S. Military and U.K. Politicians!

Dozens of Cops Implicated in Suit for “Trafficking, Raping, Victimizing” Underage “Sex Slave”*

Pornography and the Social Engineering of Human Sexuality*

Dallas Mum Discovers New Secret Service Sex scandals through Public Information Requests*

Japan Officially asked the U.S. to Stop Military-related Rapes*

Obama Spent $700 Million Promoting Homosexuality Overseas*

U.S. Legalizing Paedophilia and Bestiality

U.S. and E.U. Block the Family from new U.N. Development Goals*

The West Exports Porn, Casual Sex, and the Blood of the pre-born not Freedom*

Sex Slaves in the White House

US Military Sexually Abused 54 Colombian Children*

U.S. Rape and Sodomy of Iraqi Women and Children*

U.S. Soldiers Raping Afghan Women*

S. Korean Women Sue US Military for Forced Prostitution*