Archives

The Frankfurt School*

The Frankfurt School*

By Timothy Mathew (abridged Henry Mackow)

The Frankfurt School were a group of Marxist Jewish intellectuals at Frankfurt University in the 1920-1930’s. (They emigrated to NYC after Hitler came to power.) They included Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Herbert Marcuse and  Erich Fromm, and were responsible for the “New Left” and feminism. Financed by Jewish millionaire Felix Weill, they were instrumental in the degradation of Western society according to the long-term cabalist Jewish (Satanist) plan. The connection between Communism and Judaism is the Cabala, i.e. Freemasonry.

The Communist Jewish thinkers described in Timothy Mathew’s “The Frankfurt School:  Conspiracy to Corrupt(Catholic Insight, March 2009) are largely responsible for the degradation of modern Western culture.  This is irrefutable proof that we have been inducted into a satanic cult whose aim is to pervert, enslave and exploit humanity.

Basically, the [task of the] Frankfurt School was to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. They called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life to de-stabilize society and destroy what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order.

They hoped their policies would spread like a virus–‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no idea about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

  1. The creation of racism offences.
  2. Continual change to create confusion
  3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
  4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
  5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
  6. The promotion of excessive drinking
  7. Emptying of churches
  8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
  9. Creating dependency on the state or state benefits
  10. Control and dumbing down of media
  11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

 

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pan-sexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

  • attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
  • abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
  • abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
  • declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’

Wily Munzenberg

Comintern propaganda chief Wily Munzenberg, summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’

The School believed there were two types of revolution:

(a) political and

(b) cultural

Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

Family

Following Karl Marx, the School stressed how the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family–it was Marx who wrote so disparagingly about the idea of the family being the basic unit of society. All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse under the guise of ‘women’s liberation.’

They proposed transforming our culture into a female-dominated one. In 1933, Wilhelm Reich, one of their members, wrote in The Mass Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only genuine family type of ‘natural society.’

Eric Fromm, was also an active advocate of matriarchal theory. Masculinity and femininity, he claimed, were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought but were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.’

The revolutionaries knew exactly what they wanted to do and how to do it. They have succeeded.

Education

Lord Bertrand Russell joined with the Frankfurt School in their effort at mass social engineering and spilled the beans in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society. He wrote: ‘Physiology and psychology afford fields for scientific technique which still await development.’

The importance of mass psychology ‘has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education. The social psychologists of the future will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Russell said education will affirm:

Product of an old Illuminati family, Bertrand Russell “First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark grey . When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”

 

Writing in 1992 in Fidelio Magazine, [The Frankfurt School and Political Correctness] Michael Minnicino observed how the heirs of Marcuse and Adorno now completely dominate the universities, ‘teaching their own students to replace reason with ‘Politically Correct’ ritual exercises.

There are very few theoretical books on arts, letters, or language which do not openly acknowledge their debt to the Frankfurt School. The witch hunt on today’s campuses is merely the implementation of Marcuse’s concept of ‘repressive toleration’- ‘tolerance for movements from the left, but intolerance for movements from the right’-enforced by the students of the Frankfurt School’.

Music, TV and Popular Culture 

Theodor Adorno promoted the use of degenerate forms of music to promote mental illness and destroy society. He said the US could be brought to its knees by the use of radio and television to promote a culture of pessimism and despair – by the late 1930s he (together with Max Horkheimer) had migrated to Hollywood.

The expansion of violent video-games also well supported the School’s aims.

Marcuse

In his book The Closing of the American Mind, Alan Bloom observed how Marcuse, appealed to university students in the sixties with a combination of Marx and Freud. In Eros and Civilization and One Dimensional Man, Marcuse promised that the overcoming of capitalism and its false consciousness will result in a society where the greatest satisfactions are sexual. Rock music touches the same chord in the young. Free sexual expression, anarchism, mining of the irrational unconscious and giving it free rein are what they have in common.’

In her booklet Sex & Social Engineering (Family Education Trust 1994) Valerie Riches observed how in the late 1960s and early 1970s, there were intensive parliamentary campaigns taking place emanating from a number of organizations in the field of birth control (i.e., contraception, abortion, sterilization).

‘From an analysis of their annual reports, it became apparent that a comparatively small number of people were involved to a surprising degree in an array of pressure groups. This network was not only linked by personnel, but by funds, ideology and sometimes addresses: it was also backed by vested interests and supported by grants in some cases by government departments. At the heart of the network was the Family Planning Association (FPA) with its own collection of offshoots. What we unearthed was a power structure with enormous influence.

‘Deeper investigation revealed that the network, in fact extended further afield, into eugenics, population control, birth control, sexual and family law reforms, sex and health education. Its tentacles reached out to publishing houses, medical, educational and research establishments, women’s organizations and marriage guidance–anywhere where influence could be exerted. It appeared to have great influence over the media, and over permanent officials in relevant government departments, out of all proportion to the numbers involved.

‘During our investigations, a speaker at a Sex Education Symposium in Liverpool outlined tactics of sex education saying:

‘if we do not get into sex education, children will simply follow the mores of their parents’. The fact that sex education was to be the vehicle for peddlers of secular humanism soon became apparent.”

Source*

Related Topics:

Bertrand Russell on the Manipulation of Society*

Cultural Marxism in Action: Special Needs Sisters Taken from Homeschooling Family*

The Elite’s Cultural Marxist Agenda

Why Billionaire Oligarchs Bankroll Feminism*

Rockefeller Music Project in the War on Consciousness*

National Educational Association Blasts Homeschooling*

Kenyan Leaders to Obama: Don’t Lecture us on Gay ‘Marriage’*

6th Graders Implanted with IUD’s Without Their Parents Knowledge*

American College of Paediatricians Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage was a ‘A Tragic Day for America’s Children’*

Advertisements

Reset the Net’s Report*

Reset the Net’s Report*

By Fight For The Future, www.fightforthefuture.org

On the first anniversary of the Snowden leaks, the internet united to directly block mass surveillance.

It’s working. Huge parts of the internet are getting protected and are off-limits to bulk collection.

Below, a rundown of actions taken by major sites:

WordPress promises to protect all wordpress.com subdomain sites with SSl encryption by the end of the year. That’s 409,000,000 people and 14,500,000,000 pages each month!

Tumblr announces they will be rolling out SSL encryption on 187,000,000 blogs.

SendGrid announces TLS encryption on over 3,000,000,000 emails per month.

Wikipedia pledges to apply SSL encryption for 500,000,000 users per month.

Google announces they will offer open source, end-to-end encryption.

Namecheap offers SSL certificates for $1.99. So far, 5,000 have been sold.

All of the above organizations are uniting to promote these secure tools to millions all over the web:

ChatSecure, TextSecure, RedPhone, Pidgin, Tor, Adium.

Edward Snowden issued this statement via his attorney:

“One year ago, we learned that the internet is under surveillance, and our activities are being monitored to create permanent records of our private lives — no matter how innocent or ordinary those lives might be.

Today, we can begin the work of effectively shutting down the collection of our online communications, even if the US Congress fails to do the same. That’s why I’m asking you to join me on June 5th for Reset the Net, when people and companies all over the world will come together to implement the technological solutions that can put an end to the mass surveillance programs of any government. This is the beginning of a moment where we the people begin to protect our universal human rights with the laws of nature rather than the laws of nations.

We have the technology, and adopting encryption is the first effective step that everyone can take to end mass surveillance. That’s why I am excited for Reset the Net — it will mark the moment when we turn political expression into practical action, and protect ourselves on a large scale.

-Edward Snowden

Source*

Related Topics:

This has Always Been Your Government…

U.S. Handover of Internet Control Shows Who is Really in Charge*

Snowden: Here’s How We Take Back the Internet‏

Your Creativity and Non-conformity a Threat to the NWO*

Cities Making the Internet a Public Utility*

Remember this Face?*

Remember this Face?*

Quite a few youth have fashioned a habit based on Too Fast, Too Furious without even knowing the deeper side of the main character

Conspiracy forums have posed an interesting theory on Paul Walker’s untimely death from a car crash on Saturday, where they tie it in, and call it murder to prevent Walker, who was part of the Phillipine relief effort, from exposing “a conspiracy to supply victims of  Typhon Haiyan with a prototype permanent birth control drug hidden in medicinal supplies and food aid.” Another theory is that Walker discovered dirty money in the Philippines disaster relief and that it “would make sense because he owned a company that specialized in rapid disaster relief.” 

Paul Walker and his friend were killed shortly after they discovered a conspiracy to supply victims of Typhon Haiyan with a prototype permanent birth control drug hidden in medicinal supplies and food aid. They had a damning recording and they were on their way to rendezvous with an ally who would have helped them get in touch with the right people. Turns out they were betrayed and someone rigged their car’s breaks to malfunction after a certain speed.

Now that the loose end has been tied up, and the recording destroyed, the people responsible have nothing to fear as this will become another “conspiracy theory” no one will take seriously.

“Now here is another thread with a conspiracy on a possible motive here. Apparently, Paul Walker had discovered dirty money in the Philippines disaster relief and that would make sense because he owned a company that specialized in rapid disaster relief. “

Example of the same model car after a high speed crash:

The car Walker was in after the crash:

Source*

Related Topics:

The Story Behind Killer Typhoon Haiyan Begins to Unfold*

Implant RFID Chip Technology in Students without Parental Consent*

Why I Will Never, Ever, Go Back to the United States

It’s About Shutting YOU Down!

From a Conscious Musician to a MKUltra Slave

Court Order: The Re-Education of Lauryn Hill for Speaking the Truth!

Real Hip-Hop Versus the Music Industry*

MKUltra, Michael Jackson and Widespread Assassinations*

What the Libyan Rebels are Really Doing!

LIBYA – Resistance to US/NATO Conquest Continues

From IAC

Under the most incredibly difficult conditions –including NATO bombing, mercenary landings, Special Forces operations and the destruction of civilian infrastructure– the heroic resistance to imperialist conquest in Libya has continued.

All the corporate media lies claiming mass surrender, the fleeing of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, the arrest of his sons and more have turned out to be nothing but lies and psychological warfare. After 159 days of bombing, incredibly, the resistance continues.

The continued resistance also exposes the lie of the so-called democratic “rebel” forces –forces that have been set up by Britain, France and the U.S. to facilitate the imperialist invasion of the oil-rich country. Meanwhile, arms have been distributed by the Libyan ‘government’ to the whole population – something a hated dictator would never do.

As in Iraq and Afghanistan, an arrogant declaration of U.S. victory and “mission accomplished” does not mean an end to local people’s resistance, which takes many forms. The Libyan people have heroically withstood not only half a year of bombing, but also a hail of racist corporate media
propaganda seeking to portray the U.S.-NATO military machine, both preposterously and once again, as great white liberators.

While resistance continues in Libya, we in the center of U.S. imperialism must continue our resistance to the criminal war there – even as the prolonged economic war against poor and oppressed people continues within the U.S.

An IAC-organized truth tour featuring former Congressperson Cynthia McKinney – who traveled to Libya to be an eyewitness to the U.S.-NATO attack –has built major opposition meetings in 21 cities across the country. At each meeting, which was undertaken by a local coalition of forces, hundreds of anti-war and anti-imperialist and community activists attended.

These meetings against U.S. war in Libya have been the largest series of anti-war meetings held in years. At the same time, the IAC has been in the streets, organizing protests across the country.

The U.S. war in Libya is a first aggressive step in the expansion of wars of colonial conquest in Africa. It means new U.S. threats against Sudan and Somalia. It means more belligerent targeting of other countries in Middle East, especially Syria and Iran.

Help us continue resistance to U.S./NATO war on Libya.

Contact us at http://www.iacenter.org/ 212-633-6646  212-633-6646 http://www.iacenter.org

The Truth About the Situation in Libya

The Truth About the Situation in Libya

From Brian Becker, National Coordinator, ANSWER Coalition

 

Libya is a small country of just over 6 million people but it possesses the largest oil reserves in all of Africa. The oil produced there is especially coveted because of its particularly high quality.

The Air Force of the United States along with Britain and France has carried out 7,459 bombing attacks since March 19. Britain, France and the United States sent special operation ground forces and commando units to direct the military operations of the so-called rebel fighters – it is a NATO- led army in the field.

The troops may be disaffected Libyans but the operation is under the control and direction of NATO commanders and western commando units who serve as “advisors.” Their new weapons and billions in funds come from the U.S. and other NATO powers that froze and seized Libya’s assets in Western banks. Their only military successes outside of Benghazi, in the far east of the country, have been exclusively based on the coordinated air and ground operations of the imperialist NATO military forces.

In military terms, Libya’s resistance to NATO is of David and Goliath proportions. U.S. military spending alone is more than ten times greater than Libya’s entire annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which was $74.2 billion in 2010, according to the CIA’s World Fact Book.

In recent weeks, the NATO military operations used surveillance-collecting drones, satellites, mounting aerial attacks and covert commando units to decapitate Libya’s military and political leadership and its command and control capabilities. Global economic sanctions meant that the country was suddenly deprived of income and secure access to goods and services needed to sustain a civilian economy over a long period.

“The cumulative effect [of NATO’s coordinated air and ground operation] not only destroyed Libya’s military infrastructure but also greatly diminished Colonel Gaddafi’s commanders to control forces, leaving even committed fighting units unable to move, resupply or coordinate operations,“ reports the New York Times in a celebratory article on August 22.

A False Pretext

The United States, United Kingdom, France, and Italy targeted the Libyan government for overthrow or “regime change” not because these governments were worried about protecting civilians or to bring about a more democratic form of governance in Libya.

If that were the real motivation of the NATO powers, they could start the bombing of Saudi Arabia right away. There are no elections in Saudi Arabia. The monarchy does not even allow women to drive cars. By law, women must be fully covered in public or they will go to prison. Protests are rare in Saudi Arabia because any dissent is met with imprisonment, torture and execution.

The Saudi monarchy is protected by U.S. imperialism because it is part of an undeclared but real U.S. sphere of influence and it is the largest producer of oil in the world. The U.S. attitude toward the Saudi monarchy was put succinctly by Ronald Reagan in 1981, when he said that the U.S. government “will not permit” revolution in Saudi Arabia such as the 1979 Iranian revolution that removed the U.S. client regime of the Shah. Reagan’s message was clear: the Pentagon and CIA’s military forces would be used decisively to destroy any democratic movement against the rule of the Saudi royal family.

Reagan’s explicit statement in 1981 has in fact been the policy of every successive U.S. administration, including the current one.

Libya and Imperialism

Libya, unlike Saudi Arabia, did have a revolution against its monarchy. As a result of the 1969 revolution led by Muammar Gaddafi, Libya was no longer in the sphere of influence of any imperialist country.

Libya had once been an impoverished colony of Italy living under the boot heel of the fascist Mussolini. After the Allied victory in World War II, control of the country was formally transferred to the United Nations and Libya became independent in 1951 with authority vested in the monarch King Idris.

But in actuality, Libya was controlled by the United States and Britain until the 1969 revolution.

One of the first acts of the 1969 revolution was to eliminate the vestiges of colonialism and foreign control. Not only were oil fields nationalized but Gaddafi eliminated foreign military bases inside the country.

In March of 1970, the Gaddafi government shut down two important British military bases in Tobruk and El Adem. He then became the Pentagon’s enemy when he evicted the U.S. Wheelus Air Force Base near Tripoli that had been operated by the United States since 1945. Before the British military took control in 1943, the facility was a base operated by the Italians under Mussolini.

Wheelus had been an important Strategic Air Command (SAC) base during the Cold War, housing B-52 bombers and other front-line Pentagon aircrafts that targeted the Soviet Union.

Once under Libyan control, the Gaddafi government allowed Soviet military planes to access the airfield.

In 1986, the Pentagon heavily bombed the base at the same time it bombed downtown Tripoli in an effort to assassinate Gaddafi. That effort failed but his 2-year-old daughter died along with scores of other civilians.

The Character of the Gaddafi Regime

The political, social and class orientation of the Libyan regime has gone through several stages in the last four decades. The government and ruling establishment reflected contradictory class, social, religious and regional antagonisms. The fact that the leadership of the NATO-led National Transition Council is comprised of top officials of the Gaddafi government, who broke with the regime and allied themselves with NATO, is emblematic of the decades-long instability within the Libyan establishment.

These inherent contradictions were exacerbated by pressures applied to Libya from the outside. The U.S. imposed far-reaching economic sanctions on Libya in the 1980s. The largest western corporations were barred from doing business with Libya and the country was denied access to credit from western banks.

In its foreign policy, Libya gave significant financial and military support to national liberation struggles, including in Palestine, Southern Africa, Ireland and elsewhere.

Because of Libya’s economic policies, living standards for the population had jumped dramatically after 1969. Having a small population and substantial income from its oil production, augmented with the Gaddafi regime’s far-reaching policy of social benefits, created a huge advance in the social and economic status for the population. Libya was still a class society with rich and poor, and gaps between urban and rural living standards, but illiteracy was basically wiped out, while education and health care were free and extensively accessible. By 2010, the per capita income in Libya was near the highest in Africa at $14,000 and life expectancy rose to over 77 years, according to the CIA’s World Fact Book.

Gaddafi’s political orientation explicitly rejected communism and capitalism. He created an ideology called the “Third International Theory,” which was an eclectic mix of Islamic, Arab nationalist and socialist ideas and programs. In 1977, Libya was renamed the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. A great deal of industry, including oil, was nationalized and the government provided an expansive social insurance program or what is called a welfare state policy akin to some features prevalent in the Soviet Union and some West European capitalist countries.

But Libya was not a workers’ state or a “socialist government” to use the popular if not scientific use of the term “socialist.” The revolution was not a workers and peasant rebellion against the capitalist class per se. Libya remained a class society although class differentiation may have been somewhat obscured beneath the existence of revolutionary committees and the radical, populist rhetoric that emanated from the regime.

As in many developing, formerly colonized countries, state ownership of property was not “socialist” but rather a necessary fortification of an under-developed capitalist class. State property in Iraq, Libya and other such post-colonial regimes was designed to facilitate the social and economic growth of a new capitalist ruling class that was initially too weak, too deprived of capital and too cut off from international credit to compete on its own terms with the dominant sectors of world monopoly capitalism. The nascent capitalist classes in such developing economies promoted state-owned property, under their control, in order to intersect with Western banks and transnational corporations and create more favorable terms for global trade and investment.

The collapse of the Soviet Union and the “socialist bloc” governments of central and Eastern Europe in 1989-91 deprived Libya of an economic and military counter-weight to the United States, and the Libyan government’s domestic economic and foreign policy shifted towards accommodation with the West.

In the 1990s some sectors of the Libyan economic establishment and the Gaddafi-led government favored privatization, cutting back on social programs and subsidies and integration into western European markets.

The earlier populism of the regime incrementally gave way to the adoption of neo-liberal policies. This was, however, a long process.

In 2004, the George W. Bush administration ended sanctions on Libya. Western oil companies and banks and other corporations initiated huge direct investments in Libya and trade with Libyan enterprises.

There was also a growth of unemployment in Libya and in cutbacks in social spending, leading to further inequality between rich and poor and class polarization.

But Gaddafi himself was still considered a thorn in the side of the imperialist powers. They want absolute puppets, not simply partners, in their plans for exploitation. The Wikileaks release of State Department cables between 2007 and 2010 show that the United states and western oil companies were condemning Gaddafi for what they called “resource nationalism.” Gaddafi even threatened to re-nationalize western oil companies’ property unless Libya was granted a larger share of the revenue for their projects.

As an article in today’s New York Times Business section said honestly: “”Colonel Qaddafi proved to be a problematic partner for the international oil companies, frequently raising fees and taxes and making other demands. A new government with close ties to NATO may be an easier partner for Western nations to deal with.”

Even the most recent CIA Fact Book publication on Libya, written before the armed revolt championed by NATO, complained of the measured tempo of pro-market reforms in Libya: “Libya faces a long road ahead in liberalizing the socialist-oriented economy, but initial steps— including applying for WTO membership, reducing some subsidies, and announcing plans for privatization—are laying the groundwork for a transition to a more market-based economy.” (CIA World Fact Book)

The beginning of the armed revolt on February 23 by disaffected members of the Libyan military and political establishment provided the opportunity for the U.S. imperialists, in league with their French and British counterparts, to militarily overthrow the Libyan government and replace it with a client or stooge regime.

Of course, in the revolt were workers and young people who had many legitimate grievances against the Libyan government. But what is critical in an armed struggle for state power is not the composition of the rank-and-file soldiers, but the class character and political orientation of the leadership.

Character of the National Transition Council

The National Transitional Council (NTC) constituted itself as the leadership of the uprising in Benghazi, Libya’s second largest city. The central leader is Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, who was Libya’s Minister of Justice until his defection at the start of the uprising. He was one of a significant number of Western-oriented and neoliberal officials from Libya’s government, diplomatic corps and military ranks who joined the opposition in the days immediately after the start of the revolt.

As soon as it was established, the NTC began issuing calls for imperialist intervention. These appeals became increasing panicky as it became clear that, contrary to early predictions that the Gaddafi-led government would collapse in a matter of days, it was the “rebels” who faced imminent defeat in the civil war. In fact, it was only due to the U.S./NATO bombing campaign, initiated with great hurry on March 19 that the rebellion did not collapse.

The last five months of war have erased any doubt about the pro-imperialist character of the NTC. One striking episode took place on April 22, when Senator John McCain made a “surprise” trip to Benghazi. A huge banner was unveiled to greet him with an American flag printed on it and the words: “United States of America – You have a new ally in North Africa.”

Similar to the military relationship between the NATO and Libyan “rebel” armed forces, the NTC is entirely dependent on and subordinated to the U.S., French, British and Italian imperialist governments.

If the Pentagon, CIA, and Wall Street succeed in installing a client regime in Tripoli it will accelerate and embolden the imperialist threats and intervention against other independent governments such as Syria and Venezuela. In each case we will see a similar process unfold, including the demonization of the leadership of the targeted countries so as to silence or mute a militant anti-war response to the aggression of the war-makers.

We in the ANSWER Coalition invite all those who share this perspective to join with us, to mobilize, and to unmask the colonial agenda that hides under the slogan of “humanitarian intervention.”

(http://www.ANSWERCoalition.org)

Related Topics:

Open Letter to NATO Commanders and Political Leaders

The War Against Libya in Historical Perspective

Open Letter to President Barack Obama on Libya

Is The Media Playing Us on Ghadaffi?

Libya: Condemnation of Assassination By Imperialist Forces

Libya: 11 Imams From Peace Mission Massacred

Hypocrisy of Obama’s Speech on the Middle East

NATO: A Feast of Blood

Libya: Anatomy of a Murder

Statement on the UK Government’s Military Involvement in Libya

Kill Gaddafi By Any Means Necessary!

Rape, a Psy-ops Campaign in Libya

NATO: The Bombing of Al Fateh University

NATO’s Blood Feast Spreads

Eyewitness Libya…

Libya: NATO Poisoning the Purest Water in the World

U.S./NATO Atrocities Against Libya

Libyans Dancing in the Streets

NATO’s Debacle in Libya

NATO Igniting Iraq for What It Can’t Get Elsewhere!

Libya: NATO Massacre in Zliten

U.K: Cameron’s Reaction Proves Talk is Cheap

The riots were no surprise for some!

 

It does take an emergency to show a person’s true colour, and none better than the recent London Riots while Syria stands accused, as the contradictory responses discredits that Western leaders do actually stand up for anything.

Making invisible the narrow line between capitalism, and communism, as Britons who had disengaged themselves from politics stand to criticize that made apparent by London’s days of blind rage, Cameron, the polished man of British politics, fails miserably.

One wonders how much Cameron would have stood up to the test of Egyptian youth, as a representative of the people who:

  • Has more than a smudge of corruption in his past
  • Who defends the “rights” of his corrupt friends
  • Who withdrew the right to affordable health (alternative) from the British public, while the nation’s health is increasingly compromised by the National Health Service (e.g. injection of a toxic chemotherapy drug called vincristine into the spine rather than a vein.
  • Who tripled the cost of higher education
  • When bright students from low income families are now less likely to get a place at university – adding underdeveloped intelligence to a volatile cocktail
  • Who increased the cost of public transport
  • Who was on holiday in  Bersculoni’s Italy when the riots broke out and failed to “turn up on the scene” until the third night of blind rage.
  • When Cameron did turn up he ordered the London police to stand and observe until the third night, while the Birmingham and Manchester police were already  hunting looters and issuing clear photos of suspects.
  • Is the resignation of two top police officials previous, and the order to police “stand and observe” to make way for Cameron’s desire to install Bill Bratton, former police chief of New York, Los Angeles and Boston as head of British police
  • Had Rupert Murdoch as his communications man in government, Bill Bratton as head of Britain’s national security, and challenges U.K. membership of the European Union as the Eurozone takes a further step towards becoming a single government?
  • Does not seem to notice that the riot hotspots, are the poorest areas
  • Vows to re-write the laws pertaining to human rights when Britain Chairs the European Council in November – rights Cameron considers to be “a corrosive influence on behaviour and morality’ in a way which has ‘undermined personal responsibility”.
  • Considers evicting rioters from their homes as a solution, a solution that will make the streets their dominion
  • Has been considering even before the riots how to take control of social media – an example of democracy in action?
  • Will increase crowd control through water cannons, and batons
  • Whose concept of justice is military style retribution – not a very good example for those arrested (mostly under 18 years of age) when youth unemployment is at an all-time high of 1 in 5 (16 – 24 year olds), and unless one earns above a certain income, work is not a route out of poverty when higher education is in increasingly inaccessible to them

 

Related Topics:

U.K: If It Hurts the Family we Shouldn’t Do It!

U.K. Riots in Context!

To Be Accepted or Rejected!

British Riots: Elites “Shocked” The Poor Are Rising Up…

U.K. – Tottenham Riot and Disenfranchised Youth

Living off the Grid: How Ridiculous Can the U.K. Get!

U.K: The Affect of Globalization on Poverty

The Deserving Poor!

Anti-Austerity and Living on the Edge

Being Driven Insane!

Murdoch’s Empire: Whistleblower Found Dead

Murdoch’s Empire: Whistleblower Found Dead

 

From Alexandra

 

Some recent developments in the rapidly-evolving News Corp scandal, now being investigated by the governments of the UK, US and Australia, under pressure from News Corp shareholders.

 “AP: Whistleblower in News Corp Hacking Scandal Found Dead”

July 18: One of the first voices to blow the whistle on phone hacking in the UK, former News of the World journalist, Sean Hoare, was found dead northwest of London. Police said the death was being treated as “unexplained.”

 

“Breaking: News Corp Scandal Grows”

 

July 15: Rebekah Brooks resigned as Chief Executive of News Corp.’s British newspaper unit on Friday, and CEO Rupert Murdoch apologized for “serious wrongdoing” in an advertisement running in the British press this weekend.

NewsTsar reports that a US Citizen has named CNN presenter, Piers Morgan and the BBC in a phone-hacking complaint. Morgan denies knowledge of any wrong-doing, while he was Editor at News Corp’s The Daily Mirror, despite allegations to the contrary from UK’s Press Complaints Commissioner Tina Weaver.

The Nation today reported that Dan Cooper, who worked under Roger Ailes at News Corp HQ in New York claims that his phone and those of other Americans were hacked while he was there. Cooper described an office called “The Brain Room,” which he personally designed and which housed a black ops counterintelligence unit.

Ailes was a media consultant for Republican presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and George H. W. Bush.

 

“Breaking: James and Rupert Murdoch to Testify”

 

July 14: After initially claiming they were unavailable, Rupert Murdoch and son, James will testify in British Parliament Tuesday, July 19. US Senator Jay Rockefeller (D) West Virginia told CNN

on-camera, “It is really repugnant that one man can control so many.”

“We journalists… have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else’s country… That means always challenging the official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home… In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on us… Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the voice of people, not power.” – John Pilger

Related Topics:

Wikileaks ‘Blower Being Tortured