Tag Archive | media

NSA Phone Surveillance Program Takes a Set-back Courtesy of the Senate*

NSA Phone Surveillance Program Takes a Set-back Courtesy of the Senate*

By Lauren C. Williams

After a post-midnight vote Saturday, the U.S. Senate took no action to extend or revise the National Security Agency’s controversial phone data surveillance program, and the program along with other sections of the Patriot Act is set to expire as planned on June 1.

“Sunsetting the Patriot Act is the biggest win for ending mass surveillance programs, and one that conventional DC wisdom said was impossible. We are seeing history in the making and it was because the public stood up for our rights to freedom of expression and freedom of association — and there’s no turning back now,” Tiffiniy Cheng, co-founder of Fight for the Future, an anti-government surveillance group said in a news release.

A cohort of House members including government surveillance critic Rep. Rand Paul (R-KY) rejected Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) proposed amendments to the bill that would extend the program, the Washington Post reported. The Senate could not muster the 60 votes needed to move forward with the NSA reform bill, the USA Freedom Act, passed by the U.S. House of Representatives last week.

The failed 57-42 procedural vote early Saturday blocked the only bill that could prevent a complete shutdown of the NSA’s metadata program. The bill also would have been a compromise with the White House and civil liberties advocates to limit the government’s data collection abilities under Section 215 of the Patriot Act. McConnell said the Senate would return May 31 to vote again and prevent the program from expiring completely at 12:01 am June 1.

With Congress now in recess until after the Memorial Day holiday, the NSA said it will begin dismantling its program so that no new data queries can be made after June 1. Queries approved under Section 215 and originally set to expire after June 1 would continue through their expiration date, in the event of a complete sunset of the program.

The official sunset of Section 215 is a great victory for privacy advocates who felt emboldened by a recent court decision that deemed the NSA program illegal. At this juncture, Congress could take up new legislation to reinstate the program if the May 31 vote fails, or it can return to a higher set of standards that were in place before the Patriot Act.

As the Brennan Center for Justice’s Elizabeth Goitein put it: “The Patriot Act did not invent surveillance or the collection of business records. We’ll just go back to a system where surveillance is predicated on individuals.”


This post incorrectly stated that the phone surveillance program would expire June 1. It has been updated to report the Senate’s plan to hold another vote May 31.


Related Topics:

Missouri Bans Cellphone Tracking without a Warrant*

NIS: Surveillance from Cradle – Grave, and 50+% of Every Penny Made Deducted*

NSA Phone Surveillance Ruled Illegal, but will that Stop Them*

Controversial Muslim Surveillance Unit Disbanded*

Court Gives Green Light on Surveillance of Muslims*

UK to Legalize Mass Surveillance*

Hackers Target Mobiles – Phone Virus’ on the Rise*

Smartphone + Google Account = Your Every Move Tracked for a Month*

Jail Time and a $20k Fine for Refusing to Give a Phone Password*

Lloyds Nullifies Health Insurance against Mobiles Phones, Wi-Fi and EMF/EMR*

The U.S. Expanding its Domain to Space and Cyberspace*

NWO Ambassador: Angela Jolie on Syria*

NWO Ambassador: Angela Jolie on Syria*

When the criminal agenda is failing, and defeat is not in your vocabulary what do you do?

Angelina Jolie made an Honorary Dame by Queen Elizabeth II!

Cameron and Jolie members of the same club!?

One boy is curious about who and what this person in front of him really is

By Jonas E. Alexis

Which method would you take first when removing spider webs from your house: clean the house, or kill the spider that created the problem in the first place?

Any person with an ounce of brain cells knocking together should immediately deduce that killing the spider is indeed the first step. If you clean the house first, you can be sure that the same spider is going to mess things up again, which means you are going back to square one. Put simply, you would have to clean the house for the rest of your natural life if you do not catch that spider and step on it.

Now let us apply this same scenario in the political realm. “Actress Angelina Jolie pleaded with world powers Friday to help the millions of Syrian refugees, sharply criticizing the U.N. Security Council for being paralyzed by its division over Syria’s four-year conflict.”

Jolie said,

“We cannot look at Syria, and the evil that has arisen from the ashes of indecision, and think this is not the lowest point in the world’s inability to protect and defend the innocent.”

“It is sickening to see thousands of refugees drowning on the doorstep of the world’s wealthiest continent,” she said. “No one risks the lives of their children in this way except out of utter desperation.”

The Associated Press reported,

“Jolie, who said she has made 11 visits to Syrian refugees in the region since the crisis began in 2011, called strongly for the political will to act. She said the council’s powers lie unused because its members cannot agree on how to address the conflict.”

So far, so good. Children indeed are precious and we all should be concerned about their well-being. How can a person look at those children and still think that they do not deserve a second chance? What did they do wrong to deserve the brutalization in the region? Obviously Jolie got our attention.

But did Jolie tell us how those children end up being stranded in this useless war? Did she tell us who the instigators are? Did he mention the ideological forces that are pushing the buttons?

The answer is no. She cannot mention those deep issues because that means she would have to quit prostrating before the Dreadful Few in Hollywood. Jolie must know that the key players behind this movement are the Israeli regime and Jewish Neocons in the United States. To cite Jewish Neocon Daniel Pipes once again:

“The West should prevent either side [both Assad and the Syrian rebels/terrorists/jihadists] in the civil war from emerging victorious by helping whichever side is losing, so as to prolong their conflict.’

“This policy recommendation of ‘helping whichever side is losing’ sounds odd, I admit, but it is strategic”

Did you catch that? If Assad is winning, then the U.S. should support the Syrian terrorists; if the terrorists are winning, then the U.S. should support Assad—and this should go on until both entities slaughter each other! If that is not diabolical, what is?

Jolie, of course, does not have the courage to tell us what Pipes means. Even at the time of this writing, the LA Times itself has reported that “Israeli warplanes struck military targets in Syria early Saturday… Meanwhile, the Syrian rebels/terrorists “seized a strategic town Saturday in northwestern Syria, sending government troops fleeing after intense clashes that have seen the opposition take nearly all of a crucial province.”

Will Jolie join us in denouncing people like Pipes and saying that they are marshaling a really wicked plan? If Jolie wants to fight the real spider that is causing the problem, does she mean to tell us that she has never heard of the Neoconservative movement? If she has, why hasn’t she said a word about this?

Are we to believe that Jolie did not know that both the U.S. government and the Israeli regime have supported the Syrian terrorists? Doesn’t she know that the Neoconservatives have also been on the front line saying that we ought to take Assad out of the Zionist game?

Isn’t Jolie well aware that the Neoconservatives and their puppets such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham were and are still coming out of the woodwork and are asking for Assad’s head on a silver platter?

Doesn’t Jolie know that the Neoconservatives/Neo-Bolsheviks want to create a disaster in Iran as well? Does she mean to tell us that she has never seen John’s Bolton’s article in the New York Times, in which he desperately argues that the U.S. needs to bomb Iran? Has she never heard of a group named AIPAC, which is actually a Jewish fifth column in the United States?

If the answer to those questions is no, then Jolie needs to take a sabbatical from Hollywood and at least visit her local library. Even if she wants to be lazy, a quick google search will help as well.

It would be my honour to personally send Jolie Francis Fukuyama’s chilling essay entitled “After Neoconservatism,” in which the flaming Neocon of Stanford (formerly of Johns Hopkins) admits that the Neoconservative movement and Stalinism/Leninism are basically two sides of the same coin. So, if Stalin and Lenin’s mass killing gives Jolie nightmare, then she needs to join us in fighting the Neoconservative movement, which is really Neo-Bolshevism.

In addition, Jolie may have to start reading John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt’s The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, Paul R. Pillars’ Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy, and Murray Friedman’s The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and Public Policy. She will quickly discover that, among other things, the war in Iraq was spearheaded by almost exclusively Jewish intellectuals.

Lest we be accused of anti-Semitism or something equally weird, let us bring in again Thomas Friedman of the New York Times, a flaming Jewish Zionist. Friedman bragged that the war in Iraq

was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history.”

Perle also bragged that George W. Bush “did not make decisions, in part because the machinery of government that he nominally ran was actually running him.” What Perle fails to mention is that it was Neo-Bolsheviks (of Jewish extraction)—people like himself—who were conning the president into declaring war.

In fact, it was Perle who told the American people that the United States needed to act on its Iraq policy (which was really neoconservative policy) quickly, otherwise “it will open the floodgates to terror against us.”

William Kristol “is believed to exercise considerable influence on the president, Vice President Richard Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld; he is also perceived as having been instrumental in getting Washington to launch this all-out campaign against Baghdad…”

Those Neocons, says defense analyst Michael Lofgren, are “kind of like the terminator” and “they just don’t die. You would think they would be so discredited they would be shamed, but they have no shame”

If Jolie does not have the courage to address the real disease but wants to toe-dance around the symptom, then there is no way we can take her seriously at all. Her enterprise is just publicity stunt and show business. In fact, Jolie’s father is none other than actor Jon Voight, a staunch defender of Israel.

You remember what happened last year? When actress Penelope Cruz could no longer stomach Israel’s crimes against the Palestinians and voiced her opinions, Voight was on the front line saying that Cruz was “inciting anti-Semitism.” In 2011, Voight even encouraged Jolie to go to Israel. Jolie’s biographer Andrew Morton writes that with the encouragement of Jewish friends, Voight

“began to explore Judaism more closely, contributing to Jewish charities like Chabad and in time, according to his friend John Boorman, even considering converting to Judaism.”

Voight even told a Jewish script-writer by the name of Stuart Paul that they both have “‘a spiritual contract’ to ‘love, respect, and protect each other’s psyches.’” Morton writes that “The Pauls are a pious, close-knit Jewish family, and Jon found that very appealing.”

Another issue that Jolie would have to explain is that if she really cares about children in Syria and their well-being, why doesn’t she show the same level of concerns in her professional life? What kind of message is Jolie sending those young and precious Syrian children in movies such as Wanted?

The movie Hell’s Kitchen, according to biographer Andrew Morton, is about “dirty story of revenge, drugs, and sleazy sex…”

Another biographer writes,

“After viewing the steamy sex scenes between Jolie and Banderas [in Original Sin], producers decided to cut ten minutes’ worth for fear of their explicit nature putting off potential film-goers.”

Does Jolie really think that she can build with her right hand while her left hand seeks to destroy?

Moreover, Jolie has directed movies such as In the Land of Blood and Honey, which is similar “to the Jewish story,” meaning the “Holocaust.”

In order to promote the movie, both Jolie and her husband Brad Pitt went to the Holocaust Museum in Washington. During their visit, one interviewer asked her a question about the Israel/Palestine conflict which I thought was quite stunning:

“Do you have any idea about the current situation and maybe some ideas how to solve the conflict?”

Jolie responded,

“Do I? Oh my… (she laughs, nervously) I wish I had the perfect answer for you. I wish I knew how to solve it. If I feel that I could help in any way, if I felt like I could be a part of the solution I’d like to help be a part of the solution, not just visit…”

Jolie was certainly in denial. Israel’s massacre in Gaza last year could be viewed as the definition of tikkum olam, which is another way of saying that the Israeli regime is going to repair the Middle East by wiping out the Palestinians.

The massacre was so brutal that John Kerry had to say that “It’s a hell of a pinpoint operation, a hell of a pinpoint operation.” By just saying that, Daniel Halper of the Weekly Standard wrote that Kerry mocked Israel!

Yet many Jews who suffered during World War II also condemned Israel’s horrible actions in Gaza. Norman Finkelstein has recently written about the massacre in Method and Madness.

When the dust was finally settled, about 2,200 Palestinians lost their lives and 18,000 homes were completely destroyed “or badly damaged.”

“More than 370,000 children have been left shell-shocked by last year’s Israeli attack on Gaza.”

What is equally worse is that 70% of those who happened to be victims “did not take part in the hostilities” in the first place.

The million-dollar question is this: Why didn’t Jolie join those Jewish in condemning Israel? Why is she coming out of the woodwork now and pretending to defend Syrian children? What about the children in Gaza? What about the concentration camps there? Are those children worth at all? Why hasn’t she said a thing about Israel at all?

There are indeed too many blind spots in Jolie’s enterprise. Her movie Unbroken is also about World War II. The final question is this: Will she ask the Dreadful Few in Hollywood to produce a movie about Stalin’s war of extermination? Let us take the Zionist narrative for just a moment. We are told that Hitler slaughtered at least 6 million Jews. But no serious scholar would want to lose his credibility by saying that Hitler was worse than Stalin.

Again, I would like to see a movie about Stalin’s war of extermination. Jolie has to explain to us why we have to have at least one Holocaust movie year single year. If she cannot do that, then all we can say is that her presence at the United Nations only advances her career and compliments the work that she has been doing for the Dreadful Few in Hollywood.

In fact, she had to prostrate before the powers that be when she “found herself having sex on camera…” Even after she began to reach her celebrity status,

“Life was undecidedly unfunny for Angie…After the shoot she experience the typical depression associated with the ending of collegial venture such as making a movie. In Angie’s case, though, it was compounded by her feelings of worthlessness and alienation…contemplating taking her life.

“‘I didn’t want to know if I wanted to live because I just didn’t know what I was living for,’ she later told Rolling Stone. She decided to take sleeping tablets and cut her wrists with one of her knives.

“He didn’t have enough pills, however, and she asked her mother…to mail her more. Then she wrote a note for the hotel’s housekeeping staff asking them to call the police so that no one would have the distress of finding her body…

“At some point, lying on the bed, she came to a conclusion of sorts:

‘You might as well live a lot, really hard, and not give a shit, because you can always walk through that door. So I started to live as if I could die any day.’”

After she was established in Hollywood and bought her own apartment at the age of nineteen, Jolie still

“felt a profound depression afterward, spiralling into a mood of anger, sadness, and hopelessness. As much as she embraced life, burning faster and running harder than her contemporaries, so did she reject life, as she rejected herself. It was almost as if she didn’t really deserve a home of her own.

“Once she got the keys to the apartment, she found herself sitting on the floor sobbing because she had to pick out a carpet colour and didn’t think she would live long enough to see the carpet installed.

“Having a nice home of her own, it turned out, didn’t resolve her inner torment. And now she was truly lost: If a home didn’t provide the feeling of being finally ‘home,’ what would?”

How did she deal with all that depression and worthlessness? She said:

“Some people go shopping. I cut myself. I started having sex and sex didn’t feel like enough and my emotions didn’t feel like enough. My emotions kept wanting to break out.

“I grabbed a knife and cut my boyfriend—and he cut me…We had this exchange of something and we were covered in blood and my heart was racing and it was something dangerous. Life suddenly felt more honest than whatever this ‘sex’ was supposed to be. It felt so primitive and it felt so honest…”

Jolie admitted that she got involved in sadomasochism, which she said was “good for my image.”

What image? Could this also mean Jolie had to get involved in sadomasochism in order to make it in Hollywood? Did she have to sell herself like a whore? We know that Hollywood has a paedophilia problem, but Jolie was volunteering for sadomasochism? If that is the case, then this woman needs to stay away from the Syrian children.

In any event, if Jolie wants her life to have serious meaning and ultimate purpose, perhaps she needs to follow the moral order all the way through. The moral order—which inevitably leads to logic, reason, harmony, and which to us reached its culmination in the life of Christ—is a path that decent people should take. People may not want to reach ultimate Logos, but the moral order is our weapon against unreasonable people.

Another extremely important here is that Jolie needs to remember that the Dreadful Few simply do not care about her. They only care when Jolie is able to bring them huge amount of money at the box office. Movies such as Mr. and Mrs. Smith brought huge cash, so Jolie was revered:

But Jolie has recently been called a “minimally talented spoiled brat” with a “rampaging spoiled ego” from “Crazyland” by Jewish producer Scott Rudin (the same guy who produced Team America). Rudin has more nasty things to say about Jolie:

“She’s a camp event and a celebrity and that’s all, and the last thing anybody needs is to make a giant bomb with her that any fool could see coming.”

Rudin certainly think that he owns Goyim like Jolie:

“Rudin forced an employee to tape the definition of ‘anticipate’ above his desk. Another had to make 300 calls in a row, in one day. Rudin once pitched a fit when brought the wrong sushi. He is known for issuing the following declarations:

“‘Don’t ever f–king think — I hired you from the neck down.’ ‘This is a new level of stupid.’ ‘Why doesn’t everyone just do what I say?’ ‘My silence is high praise.’ ‘Do you think you’ll even vaguely perform your duties as my ­employee?’ ‘You have three things to do: answer the phone, listen to me and die.’”

 If Jolie has a hard time figuring out how the industry works, perhaps she needs to ask rapper DMX. Long before Rudin started humiliating the Goyim, DMX said:

“The industry doesn’t have to do with talent; it’s about playing the game…The industry—money, bitches, hate…The industry is like ‘Wait’! But in the street we’re like, ‘Get them’!

“The industry—if you ain’t got a strong mind—will break you down, [and] it’s a matter of time. The industry vultures with nothing to feast on…The industry plays in the dirt, stays in the dirt—test the wrong one in the industry and you will get hurt.

“The industry wanted, dead or alive, new artists to sell their souls…to survive. The industry don’t give a fuck about you! But the industry couldn’t make a dime without you!”

Perhaps it is time for Jolie to tell “The Industry” good bye. Perhaps it is time for her to become the woman for which she was created. Perhaps it is time for her to take life seriously and stop playing games with the “traditional enemy of the truth.”

But if she wants to stay in “The Industry,” sells her body for money and power, and then tries to make a moral point, then you can be sure that she is deconstructing her own moral point. As E. Michael Jones rightly points out,

“Those who set out to debunk the moral and spiritual order were in the end debunked by their own lives. Since they choose desire over truth, the explication of their desires debunked their entire intellectual system.”


Related Topics:

Angelina Jolie – Who is She!

From a Conscious Musician to a MKUltra Slave

ISIS/L and European Neo-Nazis United under Pentagon’s 5th Generation Warfare*

Israel Uses Child Slave Labour to Plant and Harvest its Agriculture*

Four Million Muslims Killed and Counting since 1990*

U.N. Western Terrorist States Refuse To List ISIS a Terror Group*

The Zionist Holocaust of 66 Million Russians*

Israel, Organized Crime, White Slavery, and the Sex Trade*

The End of the American Century*

Syrians Want Foreign Interference and Terrorists out of their Country*

The Last Four U.S. Presidents on What to Do with Iraq*

Iraqi Forces Arrest ISIL’s US, Israeli Military Advisors*

Why Two Canadian Schools Have Stopped Using Wi-Fi*

Why Two Canadian Schools Have Stopped Using Wi-fi*

In “The Bigger Picture,” Mary Garofalo shows the reasons why two Canadian schools have stopped using Wi-Fi.

You can’t hear it, you can’t taste it, but some are calling Wifi wireless networks a serious health threat that every parent should understand. Wireless internet is in schools around the world, but some kids are saying that wifi is making them sick. Is the convenience really worth the health risk?

Wi-Fi causes heart problems, headaches and other neurological disorders in children.

Related Topics:

WiFi — an Invisible Threat to all Life*

Australia’s ISIS False Flag to Bolster Waning Interest*

Australia’s ISIS False Flag to Bolster Waning Interest*

Support is waning in Australia for Aussie involvement in the fraudulent war on terror, just as support waned in the UK in the months before the 7/7 bombings.

Your governments and the media are middle managers for organised crime.

Permanent low intensity warfare is their MO & goal it’s very profitable, keeps the syndicate in power and you under their jackboot.

Support is waning in Austrailia for Aussie involvement in the fraudulent war on terror, just as support waned in the UK in the months before the 7/7 bombings.

Join the dots – Its about garnering public support for the endless war on terror, re-enforcing the myth and the wizards maintaining the illusion.

CIA Torture – will now drop from the front pages replaced by ISIS hostage stories from down under.

Now we have a Gladio ( latin:sword ) ISIS hostage media event in Australia. Note how the “tewwowists” demanded an audience with NWO shill Aussie PM Abbott.

It’s all about the propaganda !

The Murdoch crime syndicate owned New York Times reports …. note how many times they mention stooge Abbott.

Helicopters hovered over central Sydney, and Prime Minister Tony Abbott convened a meeting with his security advisers on Monday after an armed individual took hostages in a Sydney cafe and displayed a black flag with Arabic script in white in the window.

Police officers surrounded the cafe in the central business district where the hostages were pressed against the window holding the black flag, whose writing appeared to be the Shahada, the Muslim declaration of faith. Andrew Scipione, the commissioner of the New South Wales police, said at a news briefing that an unknown number of hostages were being held in the cafe by a single armed person, but that three of the hostages had been released.

“We don’t yet know the motivation of the perpetrator — we don’t know whether this is politically motivated — although obviously there are some indications that it could be,”

Mr. Abbott said at a short briefing in Canberra, Australia’s capital.

“There are people, even in a society such as ours, who would wish to do us harm.”

“The whole point of politically motivated violence is to scare people out of being themselves,” he said.

“Australia is a peaceful, open and generous society and nothing should ever change that, and that is why I would urge all Australians today to go about their business as usual.”

Mr. Abbott described the siege as “a very disturbing incident.”

“Our thoughts and prayers must, above all, go out to the individuals who are caught up in this,” he said.

“I can think of almost nothing more distressing or terrifying than to be caught up in such a situation. Our hearts go out to those people.”

He said he had met with the National Security Committee of the cabinet, which includes the defense minister, David Johnston, and Attorney General George Brandis.

7/7 Security responses in the UK

Cabinet Office Briefing Room A (COBRA) was activated within minutes of the first reports of explosions, and remained open round the clock for over a week.

7/7 Media response

Media response Murdoch Sky News as ever 1st to report.

The first indication of the attacks came at 9:15 a.m., when Sky News, during its Sunrise breakfast show, flashed a report of an explosion at Liverpool Street Station in the City of London. The main UK TV networks (BBC One and ITV) dropped programming and carried news solidly within 30 minutes of the first reports. Initially, the BBC’s response was slow.

At 9:20 a.m., a graphic appeared on BBC News 24 reporting an explosion in the City of London, only for it to be removed and go unmentioned by the channel’s presenters for a further five minutes. Around this time, BBC One broke into programming with a short news report, and then returned to regular programming, only to have to return to the news studio several minutes later when the gravity of the incident became clearer. The major television channels’ coverage continued throughout the day with simulcasts of the channels’ respective rolling news services BBC News 24 and the ITV News Channel. The length of this media coverage in the UK was unprecedented: for example it was the single longest broadcast in ITN’s history. There was total blanket coverage on all UK rolling news channels for several days.

see Blair footage 7/7 – Terrorist Attack On London Tony Blair youtube user

  • Five hostages have fled the Lindt Cafe in Martin Place in Sydney and an unknown number remain inside. It is not clear if the hostages escaped or were freed and police are not confirming either ways for operational reasons. One of the hostages is in St Vincent’s Hospital in a “satisfactory condition”.
  • Police have identified the gunman but have asked media outlets not to publish his name. At this stage there is only one confirmed gunman.
  • The hostages were forced to raise a black flag with white writing. It has been wrongly reported as a flag of Islamic State. The flag appears to bear the Shahada, an Islamic creed which reads: “There is no god but God, Muhammad is the messenger of God.” It can be a benign symbol and appears across the Islamic world, including on the Saudi Arabian flag. But it has also been embraced by jihadi groups such as Jabhat Al-Nusra, an al-Qaida affiliate currently fighting in Syria.
  • Police are treating the siege as a counter-terror operation.
  • The gunman took customers and staff at the Lindt Cafe hostage at 9.45am local time and has contacted multiple media outlets making demands through the hostages.
  • Mosques, synagogues and churches across Australia are inviting the public to gather tonight to pray for a peaceful resolution to the siege in a show of multi-faith unity.
  • Prime minister Tony Abbott has said the gunman has political motivations:

This is a very disturbing incident. It is profoundly shocking that innocent people should be held hostage by an armed person claiming political motivation.

Hostages Plea on Youtube!?

Four videos containing messages from hostages in the ongoing standoff in the Lindt chocolate café in Sydney have been uploaded to YouTube briefly. In the messages, the alleged hostages laid out their kidnapper’s list of demands, while standing in front of a black jihadi flag and a Lindt café logo.

The YouTube account appears to belong to one of the hostages, but all four videos posted were almost immediately taken down, and Australian media are adhering to a self-imposed blackout. Social media users have already created a Facebook group, “Bring Back Joel Herat,” to advance efforts to free Joel Herat, who, according to his Facebook account, is a student from Sydney.

“Sydney Siege” and the Shape-Shifting Sheikh

By Tony Cartalucci

Suspect had multiple aliases, granted political asylum by Australian government, interviewed by Australian media, spent years as fake pro-Western “Shia’a cleric” condemning Iran and Syria before recently “converting” to Sunni and supporting ISIS.

Another embarrassing chapter has unfolded for Western intelligence and security communities in the wake of the so-called “Sydney Siege.”

The suspect named by the media as “Man Haron Monis” also has gone by the names “Manteghi Boroujerdi” and “Mohammad Hassan Manteghi” and was an individual now confirmed to have long been on the radar of the Australian government, media, law enforcement, and court system since his arrival on Australian shores almost two decades ago.

Claiming he was a “lone wolf” attacker whose violence and extremism could not have been foreseen is betrayed by an extensive criminal record including murder, preceded by the suspicious circumstances that brought him to Australia to begin with.

Two-Decades in the Spotlight 

He fled Iran in 1996 for unknown reasons, claiming in a 2001 Australian ABC interview that he was formerly of Iran’s “Ministry of Intelligence and Security.” He claimed in the same interview to have been in contact with the UN about “secret information” he had regarding the Iranian government.

The 2001 interview titled, “New Cardinals for Rome, George Bush, Muslims in Australia,” as part of ABC’s “Religion Report,” quoted Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi as claiming:

In Iran, mostly I have been involved with the Ministry of Intelligence and Security. 

And that:

the Iranian regime wants to make me silent, because I have some secret information about government, and about their terrorist operations in the war. I sent a letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and somebody on behalf of Mr Kofi Anan sent the answer, and they want to do something.

He would also profess his love for the West, and in particular his belief that the US, Canada, the UK, and Australia in particular were “religious societies” claiming:

If we explain about the meaning of the word ‘Islamic’ as a religious society, if we say Islamic society is a religious society, and a society which has a relation with God, and wants to be honest, we can say Australia, Canada, England, USA, so many western countries, they are religious societies. They don’t say ‘We are religious’, but in fact the spirit of religion, we can see the spirit of religion in these societies. And some other countries in the Middle East, in Asia, they say ‘We are Islamic’ they have a name of Islamic, but in fact they are not religious societies and religious governments. 

Whenever I walk in the street, whenever I go out in Australia, I feel I am in a real religious society. I don’t want to say it is perfect, we don’t have a perfect society on the earth, but when we compare, if we compare Australia with Iran and other countries in the Middle East, we can say it is heaven.

ABC itself introduced Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi as follows:

People in Sydney walking past the State Parliament buildings on Macquarie Street in recent weeks might have noticed a tall Muslim cleric who has taken up residence in a tent on the footpath outside. He is Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi, a liberal cleric who fled Iran four years ago after being very critical of the Iranian regime. Ayatollah Boroujerdi’s wife and two daughters are now under house arrest in Iran, and he’s hoping the Howard government will put pressure on the regime there to let his family join him here in Australia.  

Far from an extremist – Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi instead posed as the perfect poster child for the ongoing anti-Iran, pro-war propaganda building at the time – propaganda that continues to this very day and is an integral part of current efforts to overthrow both the Syrian and Iranian governments.

He was a “liberal Iranian” fleeing the “Iranian regime” who held his family “hostage.” He professed his admiration of Western society and praised it as “heaven.” “Heavenly” could have also described his propaganda value to the West at the time.

The Shape-Shifting Sheikh 

Over the years, however,  Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi would shape-shift, coincidentally along the same unsavory lines Western pro-war rhetoric shifted – first by helping discredit anti-war sentiment in Australia by sending abusive letters to the families of fallen soldiers, then discrediting Islam itself through cartoonish acts of rhetorical extremism. And just like a shape-shifter, the character Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi would don many different costumes.

At times he would appear as a secular liberal dressed in Western, if not outdated attire, at other times a “Shai’a cleric” wearing traditional robes. Most recently, to help sow ISIS hysteria, he impersonated an ISIS supporter, claiming to have “converted to Sunni Islam” a month ago, wearing Wahabi-inspired terrorist attire. And in his final act amid the “Sydney Siege,” he would produce the flag often carried by Al Qaeda affiliate Al Nusra in Syria – a terrorist front that has in fact drawn many Australian’s from Sydney over the course of the recent Syrian war.

His alleged ideological causes were as contradictory as his attire. First claiming for years to be a pro-Western “liberal Shia’a,” dressed as a Shia’a cleric, his recent shift to supporting ISIS terrorists would mean he was backing a terrorist front of Wahabists – enemies of Iran and the Shai’a communities across the entire Muslim World that depend on Tehran for protection. It would also mean he was adopting an ideology that at least rhetorically claims to stand in complete opposition to the West he had previously claimed to admire.

While Australian authorities seemed perfectly comfortable with Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi’s continuously disruptive behavior, genuine leaders across Australia’s Muslim community implored the Australian government to investigate him.  In a 2008 Australian article titled, “Call to probe mystery Shia cleric,” it was reported that:

FEDERAL agents have been urged by the nation’s senior Shia leader, Kamal Mousselmani, to investigate an Iranian man purporting to be a prominent Islamic cleric. 

Sheik Mousselmani told The Australian yesterday the mystery cleric – who has been identified as Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi on his website after appearing under the name Sheik Haron – was not a genuine Shia spiritual leader. 

He said there were no ayatollahs – supreme Shia scholars – in Australia and none of his fellow spiritual leaders knew who Ayatollah Boroujerdi or Sheik Haron was. 

“We don’t know him and we have got nothing to do with him,” Sheik Mousselmani said. “The federal police should investigate who he is. It should be their responsibility.”

What could have possibly motivated the Australian government to continue giving a clear and persistent menace to society free reign?

The  Current Narrative Doesn’t Add Up 

It could be argued that Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi was mentally unstable, and the New York Times in an article titled, “Gunman in Sydney Had Long History of Run-Ins With the Law,” would even claim Iran itself warned of his mental instability stating:

 The state-run Iranian news agency, Fars, quoted a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Marziyeh Afkham, as saying that it had warned the Australian authorities about Mr. Monis. 

The history and mental-psychological conditions of this individual, who sought political asylum in Australia more than two decades ago, had been discussed with Australian authorities many times,” Ms. Afkham was quoted as saying.

However, were that the case, and had Iran warned Australian authorities of this man, one wonders why he would be allowed political asylum in the first place, let alone allowed to occupy the spotlight amid Australia’s divisive political landscape for so long, especially in light of his many alleged criminal offenses.

Considering the global surveillance state Australia finds itself a willing partner in, how is it possible to claim Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi was a “lone wolf” terrorist? Surely if Australians are being surveilled without probable cause, so too was Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi, and yet he was apparently able to obtain weapons, travel freely with them, all while publicly supporting terrorist organizations including ISIS.

Vox Media would report in its article, “Sydney hostage taker Man Haron Monis pledged allegiance to ISIS on his website,” that:

According to a portion of his now-deleted website (which you can see here) … Monis pledged allegiance to ISIS before the attack.

Vox would go on to cite Washington-based Neo-Conservative pro-war, anti-Iranian think-tank, the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy (FDD) to claim Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi had no ties to ISIS and that he was simply a “fruitcake.” No evidence was provided.

However, this “fruitcake” was credible enough to be granted political asylum by the Australian government in 1996, credible enough to serve the West’s propaganda campaign against Iran in 2001, and then play along with the West’s coordinated strategy of tension designed to discredit anti-war sentiment during Australia’s participation in the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and more recently ratchet up anti-Islamic sentiment and help justify continued Western military intervention in nations like Syria and Iran against which both Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi and the FDD are/were clearly opposed to.

In fact, if unable to convince Australians to back “liberals” like himself in opposition to the Iranian government, perhaps he and his handlers felt posing as an extremist to provoke support for direct military intervention in Syria and in turn, Iran, was the next best bet.

One thing is for sure, for a man in Australia’s political and legal spotlight either for good or for bad for nearly two decades, it is highly unlikely he was able to put together this plot without Australian security and intelligence agents knowing. After several recent “anti-terror” operations carried out across Sydney based on intercepted communication, why hadn’t federal agents also visited a suspected murderer openly pledging allegiance to ISIS?

The Western media’s eagerness to dismiss Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghi’s actions amid the “Sydney Siege” before a full investigation reeks of a cover-up and whatever the truth may be – what is being insisted upon by the media, government, and corporate-funded think-tanks now certainly isn’t it.


Related Topics:

Canada: ISIS False Flag Served to Bring in Draconian Laws*

Steven Sotloff Another ISIS-U.S. False Flag to Whip Up the Blood-Feast*

ISIS Flags Found in Israel*

Add the Syrian Boy Rescuing a Girl Another to U.S-ISIS Lies*

Foiled: The Simulated ISIS Attack on U.S. Soil*

Lockerbie Lies to Subvert Independent Sovereign Countries *

The Inconsistencies of Norway’s 7/11

9/11: Engineers Weigh in on the Engineered Collapse*

Were the Three Settler Kidnappings an Israeli “False Flag” Operation?*

A South African Comedian’s First Impression of the U.S.

A South African Comedian’s First Impression of the U.S.

On The Daily Show, host Jon Stewart invited on South African Trevor Noah to give Americans his outsider’s view of how things are going in the United States. Luckily for us, Noah is a comedian because if we weren’t laughing, we’d have to cry.

Stewart introduces Noah as The Daily Show‘s newest contributor, and while it appears that this will be a good fit, Noah admits that he was hesitant to come to a country with a reputation as bad as America’s.

Stewart: I know that you flew in, I guess, yesterday from South Africa.

Noah: Yeah, I just flew in and boy are my arms tired.

The audience laughs and Stewart gives him props for the cheesy joke, but it becomes clear that Noah had something altogether different in mind. Raising his hands in a “Hands up, don’t shoot” gesture,” Noah adds, “No, seriously, I’ve been holding my arms like this since I got here.”

And then there is Ebola. While many Americans may believe that since Noah is from “Africa” he should be more worried about Ebola over there than in the United States, the comedian points out that South Africa hasn’t had a single case of Ebola and the nearest outbreak is over 4,000 miles away.

Meanwhile, the United States has had several people contract the disease here and a few people have even died in American hospitals. But don’t you worry, Americans, Noah isn’t saying that countries should cut off travel to the United States. He strongly opposes the idea that airports should stop allowing people from America to travel just because of a few cases. After all, a plan like that would be pretty heartless.

After further illustrating the point that a lot of what Americans think about Africa (usually negative) and how they view themselves (as Sean Hannity likes to say, “the greatest, best country God has ever given man on the face of the earth”) are notions that aren’t remotely accurate, Noah wraps up the segment with a devastating indictment of the American system that is too powerful to give away. Watch the clip – and please laugh or you just might cry.


Related Topics:

The TRUE Size Of Africa*

South Africa’s Fight against Global Corporatization Continues*

Food Poverty in UK ‘more shocking’ than Africa says Archbishop of Canterbury*

Athens joins Ferguson on Anniversary of Teen Killing*

Tribute to Founder of KKK Stands on Capitol Hill with Dedication in D.C. Statutes*

U.S. Opposes Proven Cure for Ebola Confirmed by Sierra Leone*

South Africa: NWO’s Agenda 21 Litmus Test*

When You Can’t See the Woods for the Trees, Laugh*

Rewriting Noah/Nuh: NWO Agenda while Deleting Religious Thinking*

Rewriting Noah/Nuh: NWO Agenda while Deleting Religious Thinking*

Preparing for the new god the elite at the top of the NOW pyramid.

It is worth noting that the environmentalism portrayed in the film is very much directed towards the ordinary man, woman, and child. The basic message is to have nothing to do with nature when the programmers exploit, abuse, destroy, carry out massacres, corrupt, and profit from the same very nature that feeds the nature of man, and connects man to God…

Since its release in early 2014, the big-budget movie “Noah” has caused controversy for not being biblically accurate. While that is certainly the case, the movie does more than take liberties with the Bible: “Noah” pushes messages that have nothing to do with the Bible. These messages are actually political and come directly from the world elite.

The primary message? Humanity needs to be cleansed … again.

Throughout his movie-making career, Darren Aronofsky has created quite a few controversial movies with a powerful underlying message… None of his work can be considered “idiotic” and, despite what critics say, Noah is not an idiotic movie either. Sure, it contains giant stone monsters, primitive bazookas and Noah killing a bunch of poor souls, but the movie is smart enough to effectively communicate several of its core messages, twisting one of the oldest tales in the world to push an agenda that is very 2014.

While many viewers were upset about the many liberties taken in this retelling of Noah’s Ark – a tale that exists in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim literature – the messages added to the story should be even more upsetting. Noah re-formats this ancient tale to describe the basic premise of a new religion, one that has been pushed on the masses for years. Based on the elite’s long-term Agenda of drastically depopulating the Earth, this new religion is about radical environmentalism, the devaluation (and even hatred) of human life, and the re-alignment of morality towards a new axis.

Through its odd narrative, the movie turns the tale of Noah’s Ark into an absurd and disturbing adventure that leads viewers wondering: Why is God so evil? And why is Noah such a jerk? When Noah’s wife asks him if “the Creator” (that’s the name for God in the movie) will help them survive, Noah’s answer is almost comedic, as if he was describing a super-villain:

While the Bible explains that the Great Flood was caused by a mysterious race of Giants corrupting and “infecting” humanity, the movie does not go that route. Instead, it repeatedly tells us that humans are evil and deserve to die.

Formatted for Today

Before getting into the actual story, I need to point out a detail that is seemingly trivial, but that tells loads about the movie’s true goal: Why is everybody dressed as if they got their clothes from the world’s first Zara store?

Even if he lives in a barren, God-forsaken land (with no sewing equipment in sight) Noah always finds a way to look quite stylish. Whether he’s wearing a nice coat with fancy buttons, backpacks with all kinds of straps and pockets, perfectly fitted sexy polos or pants that strangely look like jeans, Noah is not your typical robe-wearing Biblical figure. He actually looks like a hipster going to Starbucks. Even his wife looks quite modern with her nicely designed, form flattering shirt and cool pants, complete with stylish patches. Not only that, there are no black/brown people in a region that was populated as such…

These made-for-a-2014-audience outfits basically tell us that Noah is not about the Bible – it is about today. It is a message to humanity right now, directly from the elite.

While the premise of Noah is based on the Biblical story from the book of Genesis, the creators invented characters, subplots, symbols, images, and messages to completely reshape the tale, giving it a twisted, disturbing and wholly “unspiritual” meaning. Even if one watches the movie fully expecting a “creative retelling” of Noah’s Ark, it is difficult to not be disturbed by the bloody, violent, near-psychopathic tangent taken by the main character. I mean, Noah actually kills a bunch of people in the movie! How can that remotely make sense in the divine context of the story? Well, it actually does make sense … when we understand that the movie is meant to sell a new religion dictated by the world elite composed of values it wants the masses to adopt.

One of these values is that human life is a cancer on Earth that needs to be eradicated.

In other words, they want humans to sincerely believe they are evil to justify depopulation.

Of course, as the movie tells us, most humans do die … EXCEPT those of the chosen bloodline. And that is what the elite wants us to think. We must all die to save the Earth … except them.

Noah is strikingly similar to another movie analyzed on Vigilant Citizen: 2012. As I noted in this article, 2012 is a disaster movie that is essentially about the rich and powerful people (the elite) surviving a gigantic flood while everyone else dies. The movie was full of references to the tale of Noah’s Ark and even shows helicopters transporting various animals to giant ships. The movie posters of Noah and 2012 are also strikingly similar.

Noah and 2012 tell the same story but in different time periods. The outcome is the same : The masses die while a “chosen few” survive. It seems that the occult elite enjoys the story of Noah’s Ark very much.

Noah and 2012 tell the same story but in different time periods. The outcome is the same : The masses die while a “chosen few” survive. It seems that the occult elite enjoys the story of Noah’s Ark very much.

Noah is therefore a reconstitution of a biblical story tailor-made to fit the Agenda continually being pushed by the elite … and as usual, the Agenda is rather upsetting. It promotes the idea of massively depopulating the Earth and sells it as an ecological mission. Extreme environmentalism is the new religion being sold to the masses through fear.

This religion is not only promoted in works of fiction, it is found in real life monuments. The Georgia Guidestones is a gigantic collection of stones (dubbed America’s Stonehenge) on which are laid out ten NEW commandments.

The first “commandment” of the Guidestones : “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”. From the 7 billion people on Earth today, 93% of humanity would need to die to reach 500 million.

In the article I wrote about the Guidestones, I explain that it was built by members of occult secret societies. The last commandment of the stones sums up the main message of the movie Noah:

“Be not a cancer on the Earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature”.

In Noah, it is explained that humanity needs to be extinct because it is disrespectful to nature. That is not what is said in the Bible, but that is the message this movie (and the elite) wants you to absorb.

Vilifying Humanity to Justify Depopulation

Right from the first scenes of the movie, Noah (dressed in his little Zara outfit) talks to his kids about hardcore environmental concepts that were probably the last thing on people’s minds in these very ancient times. When Noah’s son sees a pretty flower and tries to pick it, Noah jumps in to stop the senseless destruction.

Noah tells to his son “You see how the flowers are attached to the ground? It’s where they should be. They have a purpose.” Ummm, Noah… How about you chill out about that flower?

Noah tells to his son “You see how the flowers are attached to the ground? It’s where they should be. They have a purpose.” Ummm, Noah… How about you chill out about that flower?

That little scene announces Noah’s rather extreme brand of environmentalism. A little later, Noah sees “men” (a pejorative term in the movie) hunting an animal in order to eat it. Noah runs to the rescue of the animal and stabs one of the men in the leg. He then calls his act of violence “justice”. Yes, Noah is apparently an extreme vegan who stabs people who eat meat.

When Noah’s son asks him why these evil men believe that eating meat gives them strength, he replies:

“They forget strength comes from the Creator”.

This, of course, is not found in the Bible. It is part of the movie’s message that basically says “Animals > Humans”. Throughout the movie, Noah refers to animals as “the innocent” while humans are perceived as scum who deserve to die. Noah however seems to forget that many animals are carnivorous beasts who spend a great amount of time hunting and devouring other animals. That’s how nature works.

Noah has a dream where all humans die drowning, but animals swim towards the surface. He really hates humans.

At one point Noah tells his children:

– We’ve been chosen to save the innocent. The animals.

– Why are they innocent?

– Because they still live as they did in the Garden.

Throughout the movie, Noah, the “hero of the movie” displays absolute hatred for humanity and avoids it at all costs. Every time he sees “men” or man-created structures, he automatically becomes worried.

Twisting the Biblical Bit about the Giants

To further its anti-humanity message, the movie significantly twists and contorts Biblical passages about a mysterious raced called the Giants found in the book of Genesis. In the Bible, the Giants are offsprings of a group of 200 “Sons of God” who descended to Earth to mix with humans. They are said to have taught humans advanced skills such as metallurgy, metal working, cosmetics, sorcery, astrology, astronomy and meteorology. Because the Giants disobeyed God, they were also called the Fallen Angels. (Interesting note: Lucifer is also referred to as a Fallen Angel and is said to have brought forbidden knowledge to men).

Noah is aided by a bunch of big monsters made of rock called the Giants. Many viewers were put off by this Lord of the Ring-style fantasy CGI addition.

In the book of Genesis, it is said that the Giants (also called the Nephilim) where a hybrid race of sons of God and human females.

When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. (…) The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them.”– Genesis 6:1–4

The Nephilim are described in the Bible (and other apocryphal texts) as a race of giants who lived among humans. They ultimately became a destructive presence and were said to have consumed “all acquisitions of men”. In order to rid these beings from Earth (along with the humans who mixed with them) God caused the Great Flood.

The Bible therefore describes the Giants as a main cause of humanity’s corruption. The movie however portrays the exact opposite. In Noah, the Giants are described as gentle teachers who came to aid humans, but ultimately became victims of humanity’s cruelty. Later, Giants actually help Noah build the Ark! In short, the movie inverted important parts of the Bible to say that humanity is solely responsible for its demise, because it had evolved to a state that was beyond repair. The movie also makes it clear that its anti-humanity message is still applicable today.

In one significant part of the movie, Noah tells his family the “first story he ever heard”. It begins with the first line of the Bible “In the beginning, there was light” but then devolves into a grim speech about the evils of humanity.

Noah’s story about humanity is intercut with images of modern soldiers killing men. This is a rather clear way of telling us that Noah’s desire to rid Earth of humanity still applies today.

Noah’s story about humanity is intercut with images of modern soldiers killing men. This is a rather clear way of telling us that Noah’s desire to rid Earth of humanity still applies today.

The movie therefore pushes the viewers to conclude that humanity is, once again, beyond hope. Massive depopulation is therefore not a horrible catastrophe but a necessary “cleansing process”. Noah himself says:

“Fire consumes all. Water cleanses. It separates the foul from the pure. The wicked from the innocent. And that which sinks from that which rises. He destroys all, but only to start again.”

This line is not from the Bible. It comes from the minds of psychopaths who want to depopulate the Earth and describing it as a “cleansing process”. Depopulation is good. Death equals cleansing.

In the end, Noah realizes that not all humanity needs to die after the flood: His family survives. And there lies another important message of the movie: Depopulation does not apply to all humanity. It only applies to those who are not part of the “chosen” bloodline. This is the kind of the message the occult elite wants us to assimilate because they believe THEY are the chosen bloodline.

It’s All about the Bloodline

Spoiler alert: Noah and his family survive the Great Flood. But no one else does. Right from the beginning of the movie, we are told that the survival of humanity must go through a specific bloodline. Viewers immediately learn that Noah descends from Seth while the bad guys descend from Cain – a fact that is apparently VERY important.

In one of the first scenes of the movie, we see a young Noah receiving his birthright by his father. Around Noah’s father’s arm is the skin of the snake of the Garden of Eden which represents the continuation of the line of Adam.


Noah then goes to touch the finger of his father, which is illuminated by the snake skin. This “magical” scene represents the passing down of the “chosen” bloodline from one generation to another.

Of course, none of this is mentioned in the Bible. It is one of the many fabrications added to flesh out the story and to give it a specific angle:  God favors a specific bloodline.

Later in the movie, Noah’s father, Methuselah, is depicted as a reclusive but supernatural being who magically guides Noah through the Creator’s plan. While Methuselah was never mentioned in the Bible as having a role in the construction of the Ark, this addition strengthens the idea of the bloodline.

There are other strange “non-Biblical” additions to the movie that ultimately makes us think that Noah is not a “man of God”, but a jerk who only wants to see his bloodline survive. For instance: Noah actually kills a bunch of people.

When humans try to get to the Ark, Noah gets mad and starts slaying a bunch of people, cutting their heads off and spearing them. Who is behind ISIS!?

When humans try to get to the Ark, Noah gets mad and starts slaying a bunch of people, cutting their heads off and spearing them. Who is behind ISIS?

We even see the Giants kicking and stomping humans by the dozens, as if they were cockroaches. And these are “good guys”.

In another gut-wrenching (and completely invented) scene, Noah purposely allows his son’s girlfriend to be trampled to death by hundreds of people.

Noah could have saved that girl. Although Ham assured his father that this girl was “good and innocent”, he lets her die a horrible death.

How can a man that is supposedly chosen by the Creator allow the death of an innocent girl? Why was this added to the movie?

Because it is continuously communicating a message: Whether she was good or not is irrelevant. The girl was not part of the bloodline. Therefore, she must die. It is not about being a good person. It is about who you descend from.

After the flood, Noah turns into a disturbed, depressive, psychopath. When he learns that his daughter-in-law is pregnant, he is convinced that he must kill the little girl to make sure that humanity does not reproduce.

In yet another scene that was never in Bible, Noah holds a knife to his granddaughter’s face in order to kill her.

Noah however realizes something incredible: He does not feel like stabbing his own granddaughter in the face. Although he first believes that he had let down the Creator by not killing the girl, he ultimately learns that he did the right thing by “showing mercy”. But what about the countless humans he killed? Wasn’t there any mercy for them? No. Because they were not part of the bloodline. The Creator allowed Noah to murder people when they were not “chosen”. Incidentally, that is what the occult elite believes.

The movie ends the way it begun: With a sacred oath to the latest addition to the bloodline.

The movie depicts Noah’s “divine” quest as a cruel and violent process carried out by a man who is steadily turning into a psychopath. While stranded on the Ark, his own family begins to resent him as he obsesses over the fact that everybody needs to die. While he is merely following the Creator’s orders, he appears to be animated by a deep-seeded hate of humanity, which leaves viewers with a “unholy” feeling. There is however a character that counterbalances Noah’s “do it my way or else” doctrine: Tubal-Cain.

Tubal-Cain: The Other Path

Tubal-Cain is the “bad guy” of the movie and descends from Cain (unlike Noah who descends from Seth).

Tubal-Cain is the “leader of humans”, and, therefore, Noah’s mortal enemy. While Tubal-Cain is the “bad guy”, he is ironically the character who says the most thoughtful and sensible lines, which causes viewers to somewhat identify with him. Contrarily to Noah, he is not ashamed to be human and is proud of humanity’s accomplishments. Furthermore, he feels somewhat forsaken by the Creator who left his kind to roam a desolate land. He seeks to emancipate himself from the Creator’s rule through his own means. In this sense, he is a representative of a Gnostic point of view that perceives the Creator a demiurge – a lower god who imprisoned mankind in a material world. This is why God is called “the Creator” in the movie. It refers to the Gnostic concept of demiurge, the near-malevolent creator of the material world.

Tubal-Cain is briefly mentioned in the Bible as a “forger of all instruments of bronze and iron” and an “instructor of every artificer in brass and iron”. However, he is never mentioned in the story of the Great Flood and has no link with Noah. So why did the makers of the movie choose this obscure Biblical character to become Noah’s arch-nemesis? Because, while Tubal-Cain is an obscure figure in the Bible, he is an extremely important figure in the most widespread Gnostic Mystery School on Earth: Freemasonry.

A Masonic emblem depicting two balls and a cane. A code for … Tubal-Cain.

Not unlike Hiram Abiff (a leading figure in Masonic lore and ritual), Tubal-Cain is an obscure Biblical figure who takes a great importance in esoteric teachings. As a proficient maker of weapons, he represents humanity’s potential to build its own power – without the Creator. Various Masonic sources describe the esoteric significance of Tubal-Cain.

“He was the inventor of edge-tools, and introduced many arts into society which tended towards its improvement and civilization. Tubal Cain is the Vulcan of the Pagans, and is thought to have been closely connected with ancient Freemasonry. Faber says that “all the most remarkable ancient buildings of Greece, Egypt, and Asia Minor, were ascribed to Cabirean or Cyclopean Masons,” the descendants of Vulcan, Dhu Balcan, the god Balcan, or Tubal Cain. Oliver says,

“In after times Tubal Cain, under the name of Vulcan and his Cyclops, figured as workers in metals and inventors of the mysteries; and hence it is probable that he was the hierophant of a similar institution in his day, copied from the previous system of Seth, and applied to the improvement of schemes more adapted to the physical pursuits of the race to which he belonged.

For these reasons Tubal Cain has been consecrated among Masons of the present day as an ancient brother. His introduction of the arts of civilization having given the first value to property. Tubal Cain has been considered among Masons as a symbol of worldly possessions. – Albert Mackey, “A Lexicon of Freemasonry”

In Manly P. Hall’s “The Lost Keys of Freemasonry”, Tubal-Cain is described as the “forefather” of Freemasons.

“The day has come when Fellow Craftsmen must know and apply their knowledge. The lost key to their grade is the mastery of emotion, which places the energy of the universe at their disposal. Man can only expect to be entrusted with great power by proving his ability to use it constructively and selflessly. When the Mason learns that the key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply energy. He must follow in the footsteps of his forefather, Tubal-Cain, who with the mighty strength of the war god hammered his sword into a plowshare. – Manly P. Hall, “The Lost Keys of Freemasonry”

Mystery Schools love Biblical characters who did not rely on God to gain knowledge and power. Tubal-Cain is a prime example. In Noah, Tubal-Cain attempts to communicate with the Creator  – not as a servant, like Noah, but as an equal.

“I am a man. Made in your image. Why will you not converse with me? I give life. I take life away. As you do! I am like you! Am I not? Speak to me!”

Although Tubal-Cain realizes that humanity is about to be wiped away, he finds an unexpected person to carry on his legacy: Noah’s own son, Ham.


Tubal-Cain presents a sword to Ham. He is giving him the opportunity to “become a man” by giving him the power to take life.

Throughout Noah’s quest, Ham feels ignored, rejected and infantilized. He feels that he cannot become a man without being with a woman – a right that is denied by his father. Tired of being punished and humiliated, Ham leaves the Ark and mixes with the “nasty” humans. There, he finds a “good girl” he wants to marry. However, Noah leaves her to die and drags Ham back to the Ark by force.

When Ham meets Tubal-Cain, he finds the kind of father figure he has been looking for. Instead of a life of blind servitude, Tubal-Cain offered Ham the means to be a “real” man. During the flood, Tubal-Cain found a way to sneak inside the Ark and, while hidden with the animals, he “initiated” Ham to his philosophy.

“Your father filled this ship with beasts while children drown. He belittles you by telling you, you must serve them. No. They serve us. That is the greatness of men. When the Creator finished making the sky, the ground, the sea and these beasts, he wasn’t satisfied. He needed something greater. Something to take dominion over it and subdue it. So he made us in his image. Us. This is your world Ham, seize it”.

While these words were said by the “bad guy”, he was nearly quoting actual Biblical verses. This only adds to the movie’s general confusion and mixed messages.

“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.”
– Genesis 1:26, KJV

Tubal-Cain then ultimately urges Ham to kill his father:

“A man isn’t ruled by the Heavens. He is ruled by his will. So I ask you. Are you a man? Good. Because if you’re a man, you can kill”.

Ham however does not kill his father … he kills Tubal-Cain. However, this fateful act does not seem to bother Tubal-Cain. To the contrary, he knows that, by killing him, Ham has successfully completed his initiation. While dying, Tubal-Cain tells Ham:

“Now you are a man”.

In his last moments, Tubal-Cain gives Ham the snake skin of the Garden of Eden (he stole it from his father). This signifies that Ham is Tubal-Cain’s successor – not Noah’s.

After surviving the flood, Ham does not reintegrate with Noah’s family. He leaves them behind and makes his own path.

We don’t know if Ham managed to reproduce (probably not). However we do know that, in the Bible, the story that immediately follows Noah’s Ark is the story of the Tower of Babel – a gigantic tower built by humans to “fight God”. It appears that the Great Flood did not “cleanse” anything and that Tubal-Cain’s lineage survived the Flood after all.

In Conclusion

In the Bible, the story of Noah’s Ark is told in a few simple verses and is filled with enigmatic bits that are never explained (i.e. who were the Giants exactly?). The movie Noah fills in the answers to some of these questions in its own way by augmenting the Biblical tale with fabricated stories and characters, ultimately giving this ancient story a very modern twist. The same way Russell Crowe’s snazzy outfits were tailor-made for a 2014 audience, the messages in Noah were also tailor-made for a 2014 audience.

The movie basically presents two philosophical views:

One that is meant for the ignorant masses and

one that is meant for “those in the know”

The ignorant masses are told to follow a radical brand of environmentalism that leads to self-hatred: Because humanity is the evil force behind war, suffering and the destruction of nature, it needs to be “cleansed”. This message fits with the occult elite’s depopulation Agenda and is embodied by Noah.

At the other end of the spectrum, Tubal-Cain represents humans seeking godhood, acquiring the physical and mental tools to reach the same status as the Creator. This is the Gnostic philosophy adopted by the occult elite. While embodied by the “bad guy”, it is nevertheless presented as an alternative to the absurdity of the Creator who created humanity to then destroy it.

In short, Noah is far from an “idiotic” movie (as some reviewers have stated). It manages to sell a New Age religion based on self-hatred while giving a nod to the occult elite, those who fancy themselves to be descendants of Tubal-Cain. But the occult elite does not believe in radical environmentalism OR care about human life. They are the ones behind all our major wars and their greed is the main cause of nature’s destruction. Through movie’s like Noah, they are trying to put the burden of their own wrongdoings on the unsuspecting masses who usually do as they are told. They want us to welcome the idea of a “great cleansing”.

In the Bible, after the Great Flood, God himself states :

“I establish my covenant with you: Never again will all life be destroyed by the waters of a flood; never again will there be a flood to destroy the earth.”– Genesis 9:11

So, whether you believe in the Bible or not, know that if there is another major “cleansing” on Earth, it will not come from “the Creator”. It will come from those who have brainwashed you for years, convincing you to believe you are a cancer on Earth.


“Just as man, as a social being, cannot in the long run exist without a tie to the community, so the individual will never find the real justification for his existence, and his own spiritual and moral autonomy, anywhere except in an extramundane principle capable of relativizing the overpowering influence of external factors. The individual who is not anchored in God can offer no resistance on his own resources to the physical and moral blandishments of the world. For this he needs the evidence of inner, transcendent experience which alone can protect him from the otherwise inevitable submersion in the mass. Merely intellectual or even moral insight into the stultification and moral irresponsibility of the mass man is a negative recognition only and amounts to much more than a wavering on the road to the atomization of the individual. . .

“The State has taken the place of  God; that is why, seen from this angle, the socialist dictatorships are religions and State slavery is a form of worship”  – Carl Jung


Related Topics:

Royal Babylon

Deleting Religious Thinking: A Governmental Agenda*

Why is the Book of Enoch Banned from the Bible?

An Escalation in the Fight against Censorship of History*

Global Pathocracy*

Debt-ocracy: Enslaving Entire Nations and Peoples*

Former Head of FBI Speaks on Rothschild, Illuminati, Satanism, Paedophile Rings = NWO

Bertrand Russell on the Manipulation of Society*

Occupy World: India Takes Legal Action against Bill Gates for His Vaccine Crimes*

I Am the System

How Self-Aware Are You?

UN’s Heterophobic Agenda*

WiFi — an Invisible Threat to all Life*

U.S., Britain and Israel are the Biggest Terrorists on the Planet.

“The Closer You Look, the Less You See”: The Mind Control Entertainment Industry*

Egypt Seizes Newspaper that States it has Never Executed any Israeli Spy*

Egypt Seizes Newspaper that States it has Never Executed any Israeli Spy*

By David D. Kirkpatrick

The Egyptian authorities on Wednesday confiscated all the copies of one of the country’s largest private newspapers in order to censor an article, just days after President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi vowed in an American television interview that there was “no limitation on freedom of expression in Egypt.”

In fact, the censorship is another example of constriction of news media freedom since the military takeover in July 2013 that brought Mr. Sisi to power. The article, in the newspaper Al Masry Al Youm, was the latest instalment in a serialized interview conducted with a senior spy before he died.

Although all the printed copies containing the article were seized, it was available through PressDisplay.com, an online newsstand, which evidently archived the edition before it could be confiscated. The headline quoted the former spy, Refaat Jibril, declaring that Egypt had never executed a single Israeli spy.

“We used to return them to Israel in the context of deals to bring back our prisoners,” he said, according to the article, which may have undercut the intelligence agencies’ hard-line image.

Records indicate that Egypt has executed defendants convicted of spying for Israel as recently as the 1980s, with famous cases in 1954 and 1962, said Yossi Melman, co-author of “Spies Against Armageddon,” a history of the Israeli intelligence services.

Mr. Jibril, the former spy, was also quoted describing an expansive role for the intelligence agencies in domestic affairs, including “the economic, social and cultural.” An enemy might seek to “stir up unrest and gather information,” he said, claiming that he had once apprehended two Europeans who were working as spies for Israel by “passing leaflets randomly to people, inciting them to a revolution.”

Since the military takeover, the government has shut down the main opposition news media, the remaining private media are almost as supportive of the president as the state-run outlets, and the government has jailed several journalists. In June, a court sentenced three journalists for Al Jazeera’s English-language network to at least seven years in prison on charges of broadcasting false reports of civil unrest as part of a so-called Islamist conspiracy.

Al Masry Al Youm, too, is broadly supportive of Mr. Sisi and the military takeover. A senior editor responsible for the article said Wednesday that security officials had offered no explanation for the censorship.

“They just said, ‘Remove this article,’ ” the editor, Ahmed Ragab, said.

“The regime tries to protect its story about history, and we journalists try to search out new facts. It is the normal fight.”

In a recent interview with the broadcaster Charlie Rose in New York, Mr. Sisi insisted that the freedom of the Egyptian news media was now absolute.

“There is no limitation and this is final,” he said.

“Anybody can be criticized in the media, from the president to any state institution,” he added, saying, “We are very keen on ensuring that.”

But longstanding Egyptian law requires journalists to obtain the permission of military intelligence before publishing any information relating to the spy agencies.

And the authorities used the law to block publication of certain articles in a similar fashion under Hosni Mubarak, the former president, although this appeared to be the first instance of such censorship since the uprising that removed him in 2011. (Al Masry Al Youm ultimately printed and sold Wednesday’s paper omitting the article.)

Negad el-Borai, a lawyer who often represents Egyptian news organizations, said the paper had broken the law by publishing without prior permission.

Tamara Cofman Wittes, a researcher at the Brookings Institution and a former United States diplomat, said the censorship showed how little had changed after three years of upheaval.

“Sisi is telling everybody in New York, ‘We have a free media,’ ” she said. “Well, what we actually have is the same darn system.”


Related Topics:

Egyptian TV Presenter: Israelis Control Egyptian Media*

Five Reasons Why the Gulf Stopped Funding Al-Sisi*

Sisi: Cleaning Up his Image*

Sisi’s offer of Kicking People out of their Own Land Welcomed by Israel*

Egyptian Military Dissent Comes to the Surface after Assassination Attempt on Sisi*

U.S. has Already Spent Five Billion Dollars to Subvert Ukraine*

Jailed Egyptian Children Moved to ‘torture camp’*

US Apache Attack Helicopters for Egyptian Junta*

Egypt Signs Contract to Import Palestinian Natural Gas from Israel*

Even Egyptian state-owned TV Admits to a Fraudulent Presidential Election

Enforcing Imperialism through the Ballot Box in Syria, Egypt and Ukraine*

Members of Egypt’s Elite Admit to Planning and Financing the Coup as they Conspired to Bring Down Sisi*

Egypt Blocking Egyptian Humanitarian Aid to Gaza*

Former Israeli Foreign Minister, Livni, Reveals Israel – Egypt Pact to Strangle Hamas*

Media Multi-Tasking Shrinks the Brain and Causes Mood Swings*

Media Multi-Tasking Shrinks the Brain and Causes Mood Swings*

By Fiona Macrae

If you are sending a text, watching the TV or listening to the radio, you may want to stop and give this your full attention.

Multi-tasking shrinks the brain, research suggests.

A study found that men and women who frequently used several types of technology at the same time had less grey matter in a key part of the brain.

University of Sussex researchers said:

‘Simultaneously using mobile phones, laptops and other media devices could be changing the structure of our brains.’

Worryingly, the part of the brain that shrinks is involved in processing emotion.

The finding follows research which has linked multi-tasking with a shortened attention span, depression, anxiety and lower grades at school.

The researchers began by asking 75 healthy men and women how often they divided their attention between different types of technology.

This could mean sending a text message while listening to music and checking email, or speaking on the phone while watching TV and surfing the web.z

The volunteers were then given brain scans which showed they had less grey matter in a region called the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).

The findings held even when differences in personality were taken into account.

The study, published in the journal PLOS ONE, is the first to make a link between multi-tasking and the structure of the brain.

Researcher Kep Kee Loh said:

‘Media multi-tasking is becoming more prevalent in our lives today and there is increasing concern about its impacts on our cognition and social-emotional well-being.’

He added that more research is needed to prove that multi-tasking shrinks the brain.

This is because it is also possible that people with less grey matter in the ACC are more drawn to using lots of gadgets simultaneously.

Scientists have previously demonstrated brain structure can be altered on prolonged exposure to novel environments and experience.

Other studies have shown that training – such as learning to juggle or taxi drivers learning the map of London – can increase grey-matter densities in certain parts.

Experts have also warned of the harmful impact technology can have on our memory and attention span.

The University of California team commissioned a survey of more than 18,000 people aged between 18 and 99 and found 20 per cent had problems with memory.

Researchers were taken aback by the 14 per cent of 18 to 39-year-olds who also worried about their memories.

Multi-tasking with gadgets may shorten attention span, making it harder to focus and form memories, the researchers said, adding that youngsters may be particularly affected by stress.


Related Topics:

Chair of Apple Inc. Keeps I-pads away from his Own Children*

‘Digital Dementia’ Puts Half the Brain to Sleep … permanently!*

The Frequency of Everything*

Antidepressants Change the Functionality of the Brain