Tag Archive | WHO

WHO: Drug-Resistant: Gonorrhoea Spreading Across the World*

WHO: Drug-Resistant: Gonorrhoea Spreading Across the World*

By Daniel Newton

The World Health Organization has issued a warning about the viral spread of untreatable strains of gonorrhea following the discovery of three people with the superbug.

The details emerging from studies reveal a “very serious situation” as the bug is a highly drug-resistant form of the disease (STD). Doctors now say is only a matter of time until the bug becomes completely resistant to antibiotics. “Gonorrhoea is a very smart bug,” said Teodora Wi at the U.N. health agency.

 

Every time you introduce a new type of antibiotic to treat it, this bug develops resistance to it.”

What’s worse is WHO estimates 78 million people a year get gonorrhea, so an antibiotic resistant form of the bug would be catastrophic.

The Guardian reports: The infection, which in many cases has no symptoms on its own, can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility, as well as increasing the risk of getting HIV.

 “These are cases that can infect others. It can be transmitted,” she told reporters.

“And these cases may just be the tip of the iceberg, since systems to diagnose and report untreatable infections are lacking in lower-income countries where gonorrhoea is actually more common.”

The WHO’s programme for monitoring trends in drug-resistant gonorrhoea found in a study that from 2009 to 2014 there was widespread resistance to the first-line medicine ciprofloxacin, increasing resistance to another antibiotic drugs called azithromycin, and the emergence of resistance to last-resort treatments known as extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs). In most countries, it said, ESCs are now the only single antibiotics that remain effective for treating gonorrhoea. Yet resistance to them has already been reported in 50 countries.

Manica Balasegaram, director of the Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, said the situation was “grim” and there was a pressing need for new medicines. The pipeline, however, is very thin, with only three potential new gonorrhoea drugs in development and no guarantee any will prove effective in final-stage trials, he said.

“We urgently need to seize the opportunities we have with existing drugs and candidates in the pipeline,” he said.

“Any new treatment developed should be accessible to everyone who needs it, while ensuring it is used appropriately, so that drug resistance is slowed as much as possible.”

Source*

Related Topics:

Drug-Resistant Gonorrhea Spreads in Northern England*

Ottawa Sets up Testing Booths amid Gay Syphilis Epidemic*

Surprise – STD Rates among U.S. Homosexuals ‘alarming,’*

DTP Vaccine Associated With 212% Increased Infant Mortality Risk*

DTP Vaccine Associated With 212% Increased Infant Mortality Risk*

By Jefferey Jaxen

 

A study from West Africa’s Guinea-Bissau discovered that all-cause infant mortality more than doubled after the introduction of the DTP vaccination.

An observational study from the West African country Guinea-Bissau titled, “The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment,” examined the introduction of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) and oral polio vaccine (OPV) in an urban community in Guinea-Bissau in the early 1980s. The World Health Organization introduced the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) in low-income countries in the 1970s with the goal of universal immunization for all children. In the introduction, the study’s authors state,

“Except for the measles vaccines, surprisingly few studies examined the introduction of vaccines and their impact on child survival.”

The purpose of the study was to examine what happens to child survival when DTP and OPV were introduced in low-income countries. A community study of the state of nutrition and family structure found that severe malnutrition was not evident in urban Guinea-Bissau although it was initially assumed to be the main cause of the under-five mortality rate.

The study findings emerged from a child population that had been followed with 3-monthly nutritional weighing sessions since 1978. From June 1981 DTP and OPV were offered from 3 months of age at these sessions. Due to the 3-monthly intervals between sessions, the children were allocated by birthday in a ‘natural experiment’ to receive vaccinations early or late between 3 and 5 months of age. The study included children who were greater than 6 months of age when vaccinations started and children born until the end of December 1983. The researchers compared mortality between 3 and 5 months of age of DTP-vaccinated and not-yet-DTP- vaccinated children in Cox proportional hazard models.

When mortality was compared, the mortality hazard ratio (HR) among 3-5-month-old children having received the DTP (±OPV) was 5.00 compared with not-yet-DTP-vaccinated children [i.e. a 400% increase]. According to the authors, differences in background factors did not explain the effect. All-cause infant mortality after 3 months of age increased after the introduction of these vaccines (2.12 (1.07–4.19)) [i.e. a 212% increase]. However, the study findings revealed the negative effect was particularly strong for children who had received DTP-only and no OPV (10.0 (2.61–38.6)).

The researchers concluded:

“DTP was associated with increased mortality; OPV may modify the effect of DTP.”

It appears this early Guinea-Bissau study foreshadowed a line of documented injury and mortality caused by the DPT. A 2000 BMJ article found that a population of vaccinated infants, also from Guinea-Bissau, receiving one dose of DTP or polio vaccines had higher mortality than children who had received none of these vaccines. A 2004 observational study showed a doubling of the mortality rate of infants vaccinated with the single dose of DPT vaccine and increasing mortality rates after the second and third doses. A 2011 study of Guinea-Bissau females found DTP vaccine administered simultaneously with measles vaccine is also associated with increased morbidity and poor growth in girls.[iv]

In the United States, the DTP vaccine received major public spotlight and pushback after the 1985 book DPT: A Shot in the Dark was published tracing its development and describing its risks. Recently complied reports show settlements of injury and deaths from the TDap, DTP, and DPT vaccines within the United States Vaccine Court jumped 75% from $5.5 million in 2014 to $9.8 million in 2015.

For additional research on the Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus vaccine, visit the GreenMedInfo.com Research Dashboard.

Source*

Related Topics:

Are the Birth Defects of Zika virus Caused by Tdap Vaccine?

African-American Autism and Vaccines*

CDC Admits MMR Vaccine Increases Autism Risk, Particularly in African American Boys.

50 African Children Paralyzed by Gates-Funded Meningitis ‘Vaccine’*

Poor Asian, African, and Latin American Children Targeted by Gates and Others with Questionable Vaccines*

Thousands of Africans Rise Up Against Bill Gates*

Catholic Nun Arrested for Obstructing Kenya’s Vaccination Program*

From Ghana Ebola as a Virus Does not Exist Except for Those Who Got Sick from the Shots*

Post-Ebola Syndrome or Fluoroquinolone Poisoning?*

Ebola Didn’t Work so, U.S. Pushes AIDS-Causing Drugs on U.S. Black Population*

Vaccine-derived Polio Spreading in “Polio-free” India*

Lab Report Analysis Found Round Up in MMR Vaccine*

U.K: A Re-Vamped Vaccine with a Dangerous Past Now Available!

U.K:  A Re-Vamped Vaccine with a Dangerous Past Now Available!

 

By Hwaa Irfan

Would you knowingly take a drug that causes encephalitis, bilateral deafness and meningitis? This is the result of a recently revamped vaccine to be made available.

Vaccines like geo-engineering the weather, is not an exact science, in fact they are not sciences at all in the true sense of the meaning of science. Vaccines probably began with innocent intentions that arose out of the devastating affects of disease in the mal-nourished pre-industrial world. The idea was grand, but all it takes is a powerful, influential few to take interest, and realize the potential sitting and waiting that has more to do with self-interests than public health.

When governments turn public health into a campaign based on questionable data, and make it almost criminal to not take the vaccines they desire, or to question those vaccines, one has to ask the simple question why. If the immediate answer is more profits for the rich, then does that justify the intensity to which they apply it these vaccines. When they publicise data that supports vaccines, what happens to the data (some governmental) which proves the dangers/futility of vaccines, and why do they deny the public the right to informed choice. Taken, that the mass treatment policy is the essence of modern allopathic medicine, and so one naturally assumes that vaccines can be applied in the same way, but still the question remains why do they suppress data that contradicts this policy, and the millions of lives that are a consequence of such policies!

With the above in mind, what was once designated as a dangerous vaccine is now back on the scene, by another name! The vaccine concerned was first approved for use in the U.K. as the MMR vaccine Pluserix, which had been banned in Canada according to Christina England for Vactruth.  The reason Canada banned Pluserix was due to the thousands of children that had suffered irreversible side effects from this vaccine, and did the same in the U.K.

In April 1994, Richard Barr, a solicitor, filed class action against ventis Pasteur, SmithKlineBeecham, and Merck, manufacturers of MMR vaccines under the Consumer Protection Act 1987. The vaccines concerned were Immravax, Pluserix-MMR and MMR II. The claim was that MMR is a defective product and should not have been used.

In 1998, when the British Joint Comittee on Vaccines and Immunization, JCVI approved Pluserix, not all on the Committee were amused. Dr. Lucjia Tomljenovic shocked had the following to say which was known to JCVI at the time of approval:

Thus, instead of re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety concerns were fully evaluated, the JCVI choose to support the existing policy based on incomplete evidence that was available at that time.”

Encephalitis, bilateral deafness and meningitis are but a few of the side effects of Pluserix as decribed in Tomljenovic paper: The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): Are They at Odds?

The same applied to Medi-Mumps, which is now the unlicensed Pavivac which began advertizing in June 2012.

In September 2012 the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, MHRA instead of seeking a ban until such time the vaccine can be proven eitherway responded with a statement:

The MHRA was made aware of information presented on the Children’s Immunisation Centre (CIC) website about Medi-Mumps and a related press release. The MHRA was concerned that the information provided an unbalanced view of the safety and efficacy of the vaccine because it did not mention the MHRA’s concerns and previous CSM advice or that the product was unlicensed. (emphasis added)

We understood that the Medi-Mumps vaccine is manufactured from the same stock and processed in the same way as Pavivac mumps vaccine. (emphasis added) The MHRA, acting on advice from an independent advisory committee, the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM), has for a number of years objected to the importation of the Pavivac product because there is insufficient information available to assure its safety, quality and efficacy.

Medi-Mumps is available at two U.K. private clinics: The Children’s Immunization Center, and the Early Onset Clinic. Medi-Mumps has been cultured on dog cells—canine kidney cells, which was rejected in 2002 by the Committee on the Safety of Medicines.

So with all the regulations, what are they regulating!

The British Medical Association is a registered trade union. Their aim is to:

“to promote the medical and allied sciences, and to maintain the honour and interests of the medical profession”.

Not the advancement of public health.

In the British Medical Bulletin (Volume 62, Issue 1), the guidelines for U.Ks policy on mass immunization is ‘influenced’ by World, Healtjh Organization, WHO mandate for Europe. The globalization of vaccines took place through WHO, and UNICEF. The International Planned Parenthood Foundation, which directs birth control (including vaccines) as a form of eugenics on the African-American peoples partnered with WHO, UNICEF, and the UN Economic and Social Control in 1971. The World Bank and the UN Population Fund have a lending policy that borrowing countries must implement population reduction methods, as outlined in the report World Bank’s Reproductive Health Action Plan 2010-2015 . This policy forms a part of the infamous Milennium Development goals. Eugenicist, and globalist, professor John Cleland in his frustration highlighted the matter in 2006 to the UNs Population Fund, the International Planned Parenthood Foundation, the European Commission, the World Bank and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

“It does this cause no service at all to continue to shroud family planning in the obfuscating phrase “sexual and reproductive health”. People don’t really know what it means. If we mean family planning or contraception, we must say it. If we are worried about population growth, we must say it. We must use proper, straightforward language. I am fed up with the political correctness that daren’t say the name population stabilization, hardly dares to mention family planning or contraception out of fear that somebody is going to get offended. It is pathetic!”

Pathetic it is not, but an attempt to make sure we do not understand enough to rebel falling prey to a global consensus in favor of the benefits to the global elite (wealth, power, and control over the means of production and the world’s natural  resources)! The first Director-General of UNESCO was Julian Huxley, a eugenicist like Bill Gates who works avidly with WHO. As Director-General Huxley wrote:

The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore… they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilisation.

That pretty much outlines who the target population is, an agenda that has remained in place since inception after WWII advanced by modern technologies!

Ministers actions on mass immunization are advised by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI). For 30 years JCVI has been proactive in withholding information that proves the danger of MMR vaccine from the public.

“Deliberately concealing information from the parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could thus be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.” – Tomljenovic

If the period of 2008 till now has proven anything, it is that the public has to educate itself on the truths in order to ensure that justice be done, for when our children fall ill at the hands of government programs, and that illness lasts a lifetime, who will foot the bill, and redeem their lives! That misery becomes the responsibility of the families alone, a costly burden not just financially that can tear a family a part in difficult times! As the U.K. has been dismantling its health system, many doctors have been advised to not refer patients to hospitals because the hospitals cannot afford to carryout the required medical help. A responsibility that has been the governments for so long now leaves the people out in the cold! Reducing the population is one thing, but to render the population incapable of taking care of itself, is a crime against humanity not that population reduction without informed consent is any less a crime!

Sources:

England, C. “Dangerous Banned Vaccine Repackaged and Given New Name.” http://vactruth.com/2012/09/24/dangerous-vaccine-repackaged/

Maessen, J. “Eugenics Alert: World Bank Population-Reduction Lending Schemes Already Underway.” http://www.infowars.com/eugenics-alert-world-bank-population-reduction-lending-schemes-already-underway/

Salisbury, D.M., Beverley, P.C.L., Miller, E. “Vaccine Programmes and Policies.” http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/content/62/1/201.full

Tomljenovic, L. “The Health Hazards of Disease Prevention.” http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf

Related Topics:

Now It’s U.Ks Turn for Enforced Vaccines!

Government Evidence of the Dangers of Mercury in Vaccines

U.K. Released Documents Prove Governmental Concern About Measles Vaccine

Vaccine Link to Autism Come to the Surface

The Lies We Trust: Cancer and Other Viruses

U.K: Your Health is No Longer Your Choice!

HPV: Another Cervical Cancer Scam!?

Painkillers and Male Reproduction Dont Mix!

Imposing Chemotherapy on Children!

U.K: To Become a Genderless, Parentless Society

Birth Controling a Nation

U.K. Shamed Out of a Free School Meal!

Refuse the Vaccine and We’ll Take Your Baby!

Refuse the Vaccine and We’ll Take Your Baby!

 

By Hwaa Irfan

 

Many parents in developed countries can detail the manner in which their rights as parents have been stripped as global governance becomes increasing centralized, especially if one cannot afford the choices that are in favor of the child. The debate over parental choice has been waged consistently against the Muslim world specifically, but more and more those parental rights are being whittled away in countries like the U.K., the Netherlands, and the U.S., at a pace that is alarming, and in a manner that is more pervasive.

When one reads about the case of American citizen, Jodi Ferris, corporate profits goes out the window, though some people will do anything for money. Whatever enters the mind, there is nothing that can take away from the sheer horror of what was done. What is left is a mother who made a normal decision, and paid the price, by having her child taken away and the fact that all American citizens who are not members of the economic elite, are simply one great field of research, and experimentation.

Jodi Ferris

Sarah for the Healthy Home Economist  reports on the experience of expectant mother, Jodi Ferris at the Penn State Hershey Medical Center , Pennsylvania.

Jodi had not planned for a hospital delivery, but she went into labour earlier than expected, and to be on the safe side, the midwife advised Jodi and her husband to go to the hospital.

Jodi gave birth in the ambulance, and staff on hand at the government run hospital took charge instantly. Jodi was not allowed contact with her baby. Without consulting Jodi, she was injected with the hormone oxytocin, and was only asked if she had an allergic injection after giving her the injection.

Meanwhile, Jodi’s request to see her baby girl went unheeded.

Jodi was finally told something about her baby  girl — basically that it was healthy.

Then another doctor spoke to her later on, and told her that the baby girl was sick – very sick, and as such, the baby has to stay in hospital.

One hour after being told that her baby girl, Annie was sick, Annie was brought to her mother Jodi – the first time that her and her baby are making contact after birth. Jodi was told that Annie was doing well, and could go home soon. As for what was wrong with Annie, that is not evident.

However, the story was to chang again…

Jodi and her husband Scott were told a few hours later by another member of staff that according to a non-existent law, Annie would have to stay in hospital for observation, for up to 48 hours.

Jodi and Scott consulted risk management as to the reason, and they were told Annie was fine, but were concerned if anything went wrong after Annie was discharged, the hospital could be sued. Of course the parents reasoned on the logic of it all, and finally risk management relented, and said Annie could leave after 24 hours, and that Jodi and Scott could stay with Annie overnight.

However, before those 24 hours could transpire, a social worker appeared, and informed them of the intent to carry out an investigation, and that leaglly the parents could not be informed of the allegations before questioning. Of course Jodi found this manner of questioning unacceptable, so she was threatened by the social worker, who said she would call the police who would take custody of the baby. The social worker claimed that Jodi refused a Vitamin K shot for her baby, but no one had ever asked Jodi. The fact was, the baby had already been given the shot.

Jodi’s husband Scott, had to leave because their other children were staying with friends, and time was up.

Without that additional support, a mother who has just given birth was on her own to face what was to come.

The hospital now demanded that Jodi allow Annie to have a Hepatitis B vaccine. Jodi agreed, as long as they tested her and Annie first to see if they had Hepatitis B. Such testing was not possible the same day, and the social worker tried to make Jodi agree without testing. Jodi asked for time for her husband to be returned, so that she could consult with him. However, the social worker got more aggressive and once again, threatened Jodi with the police, claiming custody of Annie, and in the same breathe, to sign a “safety plan” which would wrap up the investigation.

Jodi stood her ground, and stated that her husband and an attorney should be present for the signing, as she was in no physical state to do so.

The social worker called for the police, and without a court order, the police took custody of Annie under the premise that Annie was ill.

The social worker approved the hepatitis B vaccine, and made Jodi leave the hospital and to return every 3 hours to nurse Annie!

Scott arrived just as Jodi was leaving, and spent the night in the parking lot while Annie was inside the hospital under the custody of the police and social services.

The following morning, Jodi and Scott attended a shelter care hearing with a judicial officer present who on hearing the ordeal as returned Annie to her parents, the affect of which will reveal in tme in terms of health, child parent bonding, and psycho-social developmental issues. To stop this from happening to anyone else, Jodi and Scott, are taking this case to court, donations of which to support the legal battle can be sent to:

Homeschool Freedom Fund

Above Sovereign Mandate

The World Health Organization that declared H1N1 a pandemic, when it was not, has of 2005. S a strong example of what global governance means the sovereignty of a country that is a member of WHO is removed in the case of a pandemic. WHO can:

  • Replace governments with a special crisis committee that would be responsible for the nations health, and security infrastructure. These special crisis committees would only be answerable to WHO, and in the case of Europe,  WHO and the EU, and in the case of North America, WHO  and the UN.
  • Under such circumstances, it will be a criminal offense to refuse a vaccine, and police are allowed to use deadly force
  • When a public health alert has been raised governors and public health officials can, force a suspected carrier to undergo medical examination, track and share private health (including genetic) data, enforce vaccination, and quarantine that person, and more…

If there was a health emergency alert in Pennsylvannia for Vitamin K, and Hepatitis B, Jodi and her husband were unaware of it!

What Parents Can Do!

There is nothing like a good network of support – that is afterall what communities are based on, but modern life can take its toll on communication.

In the U.K., the jabs.org forum reccommends reading  Raising a Vaccine Free Child by Wendy Lydall, How to Raise a Healthy Child Despite Your Doctor by Robert Mendelsohn, and  The Truth About Vaccines by Richard Halvorsen.

The forum also recommends a good parents support group like http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/arnicaparents/  which has homeopaths and nutritionists. Their focus is on natural immunity and good health.

Ethan Huff of Natural News recommends demanding the doctor signs the following letter:

PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY

I (Physician’s name, degree) _______________ , _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State/Province of _________ . My State/Provincial license number is ___________ , and my DEA number is ____________ . My medical specialty is _______________ .

I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name) ______________ , age _____ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________

I am aware that vaccines may contain many of the following chemicals, excipients, preservatives and fillers:

* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain
* arginine hydrochloride
* dog kidney, monkey kidney
* dibasic potassium phosphate
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* gentamicin sulfate
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrocortisone
* hydrolyzed gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* monobasic potassium phosphate
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* nonylphenol ethoxylate
* octylphenol ethoxylate
* octoxynol 10
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium chloride
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sodium deoxycholate
* sorbitol
* thimerosal
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses”).

In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: __________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B, attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C, attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety.”

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”

Hepatitis B

I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.

I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
____________________________________
____________________________________ _____________________________________

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D, attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors.” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________ , an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
_________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
______________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: _____________ Date: ______________________

http://preventdisease.com

Prepare for the coming season of declated emergencies, as of May, 2012, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control has predicted’ an epidemic of Hepatitis C. CDC’s plan of action includes:

  • Everyone born between 1945  – 1965 to be tested for Hep-C, so they can receive treatment after  diagnosis ( was the case of Jodi Ferris (and others) a test-run?).  Those who ‘qualify’ will then be vaccinated against Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B.

Out of date statistics show that in the U.S, the leading cause of death is not:

  • Heart disease at an annual rate of 699,697  (2001)
  • Cancer at an annual rate of 553,251 (2001)

But…

  • 999,936 from medical intervention,  with Adverse Drug Reaction (iatronic deaths) at an annual rate of 106,000!

Sources:

Fassa, P.CDC Wants to Go After All Baby Boomers With Vaccines For a Phantom Virus.” http://www.naturalnews.com/036021_CDC_hepatitis_baby_boomers.html

Huff, E. “Before Vaccinating Your Children, Demand Your Doctor Sign This Form.” http://www.naturalnews.com/036006_vaccination_doctor_form.html

“Leading Cause of Death in the U.S” http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston/Leading_Cause_of_Death_in_the_US.html

Oakley, M. “Refusing Vaccination Labels You A Criminal, So Says WHO.” http://farmwars.info/?p=1314

Sarah. “Mother Who Questions Vax at Hospital Has Newborn Taken Away.” http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/mother-who-questions-vax-at-hospital-has-newborn-taken-away/

Related Topics:

So You Think Vaccines Protect You!

The Flu Vaccine that Makes You More Ill

Vaccine Link to Autism Come to the Surface

Vaccine Wake-up Call for Parents

Government Owns Up to a Vaccine Induced Illness

India: Bill Gates Financing Untested Vaccines that Spread the Disease It Claims to Cure!

GM Mosquitoes: Programming Nature

GM Mosquitoes: Programming  Nature                                                                            

By Hwaa Irfan 

Philanthropist Bill Gates has been at it again, that is reinventing nature. One wonders which cult movie/T.V. serial he is fan of with the creation of genetically engineered mosquitoes. Once again, this is old news to many, and one that passed without much alarm publicly, well at least not as much as the film the X-Files! Funded to the tune of $19.7 million by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and led by Anthony James of the University of California

The first known release of 3 million male GM mosquitoes took place last year took place last year on the British colony the Cayman Islands, but was only publicized in October 2010, and the results presented at the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. The OX513A not a flattering name for the GM version of the Aedes aegypti mosquito, which spreads dengue fever, was engineered by the U.K.-based biotechnology company Oxitec (funded $5mn by the Gated Foundation), with the field experiment carried out by the Cayman Island’s Mosquito Research and Control Unit. The intention was to eliminate the infection and spread of dengue fever. GM males were to mate with normal females to produce larvae that die. The trials were supposed to have been presented at the 5th meeting of the Parties to the Cartegena Protocol on Biosafety, which is concerned with international safety issues pertaining to GM organisms, but were not. As to the reality on the ground, that is yet to be seen. Much is based on supposition – the supposition that GM males did compete with normal males, and that the population of normal mosquitoes (referred to as wild as a part of the labeling process towards the perception of serious threat) has been reduced according to Oxitec, but without actual evidence. As such, Oxitec considers its trial to have been successful. Oxitec is awaiting approval for its trials to be repeated in Brazil, Panama and the U.S, although the original study by James pertained to Mexico.

The World Health Organization, which seems to have known of the trial in the Cayman Islands, are still in the process of drawing up guidelines on transgenic mosquitoes, while Malaysia’s National Board of Biosafety has given approval for the trials to go ahead in Malaysia. Unfortunately, Bill Gates is also the principal investigator for the regulatory body Mosqguide, which is funded by the World Health Organization.

We are supposed to be placated by the fact that GM mosquitoes are programmed to not have offspring, according to medical entomologist Willem Takken (Wageningen University, Netherlands), but how can they guarantee that will not happen! It is argument that has not won the support of Gurmit Singh, chair of the Center for the Environment, Technology, and Development in Malaysia, being suspicious about the fact that the trial was kept quiet despite Oxitec statement that the trials were not kept quiet. Malaysian professor at the University of Malaysia, Rosli Omar, is none too pleased. A member of Save Our Rivers – Sengalor, Omar was unaware of the trials on the Cayman Islands in September 2010. Omar argues that invasive species act invasively once released into the environment to the detriment of the environment. Omar gives the example of the Asian Carp that was introduced to the U.S. to rid the rivers of the Snakehead is destroying the freshwater ecosystem, and the cane toad that was introduced to Australia. GM mosquitoes are invasive, because of their new traits, which is made worse by the fact that the normal Aedes aegypti is an introduced species to Malaysia that has become a pest. Once released into the environment it cannot be controlled, it cannot be caught, its behavior in the field cannot be guaranteed, after all, they are not micro-chips, and they are subject to mutation once they mate with the normal species, like the growing problem antibiotic resistant bacteria in hospitals.

{Are the blind and the seeing alike? Or can the darkness and the light be equal? Or have they set up with Allah associates who have created creation like His, so that what is created became confused to them?} (Ar -Rad 13: 16)

In Mexico, where corn is a part of the staple diet, the effects of GM corn has been a burning issue with it neighbor the U.S. producing mostly GM corn. As a result of a six-year experiment, it was found that GM crops held new genetic traits such as resistance to herbicides or pests that could result in out-competing the crops. There was also delayed flowering and reduced fertility in GM crops. These genetic traits added through genetic engineering are able to spread to weeds, and become permanent traits of the weed population. Of the GM mosquitoes that do survive and breed can it be guaranteed that they will not produce a more dangerous species, which differs in choices of habitat. Mexican teosinte corn has undergone centuries of breeding by indigenous small farmers in what constitutes the world center for the biodiversity of corn with 20,000 varieties. However, in the birthplace of corn an invasion has been underway that was only recently discovered in the remote highlands of Oaxaca, Mexico. The invader is GM corn that has been found along roadsides, cracks in sidewalks and anywhere there is soil including remote mountain settlements. Mosquitoes have wings, and the GM mosquito can change the traditional habitat, and breeding patterns of the normal mosquito. One GM crop with severe side effects is Starlink Corn produced by Aventis Crop Science. Starlink was engineered to be toxic to insects. However, it was found to be heat stable and resistant to stomach acids and enzymes, thus rendering it indigestible by the human body. As an allergen, it was shown to cause skin rashes, nausea, and respiratory problems. In severe cases, allergens can cause anaphylactic shock (hypersensitivity to a foreign substance) or death, what will the sting of a first generation of GM mosquito from breeding?

In the Malaysian trial, the GM mosquitoes are to be released in the inland district of Bentong, and Alor Gajah, and then they are to be recaptured using mosquito traps! If it was possible to capture mosquitoes, why has it not been done before? How can they guarantee capturing all of the GM mosquitoes, and even then, how can they guarantee that the GM mosquitoes have not mated successfully? Lab tests so far have demonstrated that 3% of the offspring of male GM mosquitoes and normal female mosquitoes did survive into adulthood according to Ahmad Parveez Ghulam Kadir, head of the nations Genetic Modifications Advisory Committee.

Commonsense

A different approach has used nature to fight nature. Cuba in the battle against Dengue fever and malaria has produced biolarvicides, Bactivec, and Griselesf since the 1990s. They are added to water to kill mosquitoes as larvae, and have been imported into Africa, but now Cuba aims to build biolarvicide factories in Africa and Brazil. Biolarvicides, which are also produced in India, are based on the toxins of mosquitoes. They are cost effect, and effective in the environment without risking the environment or public health; as to whether biolarvicides based on the toxin of the Aedes aegytpi have been produced is not too clear, but the toxins used in Bactivec and Griselesf have proven effective against all mosquito species according to claims made. The use of biolarvicides in Angola, has proven to reduce the incidence of malaria by 50%, and 75% in the capital of Ghana, Accra.

 Sources:

“Bill Gates Funds Approval of GM Mosquitoes to Combat Dengue.” http://www.infowars.com/bill-gates-funds-approval-of-gm-mosquitoes-to-combat-dengue/

Enserick, M. “GM Mosquito Trial Strains Ties in Gates-Funded Project.”

http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/11/gm-mosquito-trial-strains-ties.html

Nightingale, K. “GM Mosquitoes were Released on the Islands Last Year, But Only Published Last Month.”

http://www.scidev.net/en/news/gm-mosquito-wild-release-takes-campaigners-by-surprise.html

Omar, R. “GM Mosquito Trial: A Dangerous Precedent.”

http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/142539

Salgado, L. “Cuba Launches Next Phase of African Malaria Project.” http://www.scidev.net/en/news/cuba-launches-next-phase-of-african-malaria-project.html

Tan, C. S. “Genetically-Modified Mosquitoes to be Released in Malaysia in Attempt to Control Dengue Fever.”

http://ecology.com/ecology-today/2010/11/14/genetically-modified-mosquitoes-to-be-released-in-malaysia/

Related Topics:

All Things Are Linked!

The Pill, Our Bodies, and Ourselves

Meat By Any Means 

GM Foods and Fertility

Stopping the Menstrual Flow During Ramadhan

Bill Gates and Population Control

New Intellectual Property Right Laws Increase Risk of Bad Medicine

Drugs That Stop Your Brain from Working…

Behind the Food Price Crisis!