Tag Archive | WWII

World Leaders Agree to Merge NATO and E.U.*

World Leaders Agree to Merge NATO and E.U.*

World leaders recently gathered at the NATO summit in Warsaw to strike an historic deal that will see the European Union and NATO merge to form a superstate. 

The stunning admission given by leaders at the summit means that both the E.U. and NATO will eventually be one and the same thing.

Theduran.com reports:

OK so it was not exactly stated in such a fashion, but we all got the hint. It was telegraphed to us by Mr. NATO himself, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, when he said,

“It is a very successful summit because it is a summit with a lot of substance, and it is historic because it is a summit that takes place at a decisive time for our security…This summit is important because…[it] reflects that we are bringing the NATO-EU cooperation to a new level, and that is important for NATO, it’s important for the European Union and it’s important for all the people living in Europe and North America.”

The two behemoth super structures will begin their honeymoon period focusing on two issues together…cyber threats and E.U. migration.

The European Union and NATO said in a joint declaration that they will seek to expand their co-operation in responding to cyber threats and organise parallel and co-ordinated exercises starting early next year.

Remember that NATO, just a few months back, declared that a cyber attack on one member state would be seen as an attack on the alliance, and warrant a military response. All of this was later followed by a never ending media blitz on how Russian hackers were stealing everything under the sun (and in Hillary’s server basement), up until Guccifer 2.0 debunked the entire charade.

Likewise NATO declared that it is ready to use its military capabilities to help the European Union cope with the migrant influx.

Sputnik News has more on NATO’s migrant helping hand…

The European Union is currently struggling to manage a massive refugee crisis with hundreds of thousands of people leaving conflict-torn countries in the Middle East and North Africa to escape violence and poverty and seek asylum in Europe.

What can NATO do about migration? Migration is a big challenge for the European Union and the European society. What is NATO as a military alliance has to contribute to that? And I think we have large military capabilities that could be applied alongside mainly the E.U., which has the lead here, not supplant the E.U., not to take over the job, but simply compliment the EU. And I think on Saturday you will hear some announcements of how NATO can get into that effort alongside the E.U. as a complimentary force,” Doug E. Lute said at the 2016 NATO Future Leaders Summit in Warsaw.

NATO is set to help remedy a migrant issue that they so handily created in the Middle East and North Africa, with their bombs, away no-fly zones, that removed stable leaders of stable countries, in exchange for chaos and tribal state conflicts.

We are sure that the NATO – E.U. super state will be a success. How could it not be…with the track record these two organisations have going for them.


Related Topics:

Leaked E.U. Document Reveals Plans for Superstate after Brexit*

Pentagon Approves U.N. Use of Force against Civilians*

U.S., NATO Deploy Troops to Russia in WWIII Build-up*

U.S. Sends 5,000 Tons of Ammunition to Germany ‘to help NATO alliance’*

NATO’s Jihad Operation in Brussels*

U.S. Led NATO to send 4,000 Troops to Russian Borders*

Israel Accepts Invitation to Hold Permanent Mission at NATO’s HQ*

NATO Amassing Hostile Forces on Russia Borders not Seen Since the Invasion in 1941*

NATO Violates Pledge to ‘Not Station Permanent Combat Troops’ in E. Europe*

E.U. begins Sanctions Process against Spain and Portugal*

European Refugee Camps in Syria During WWII*

European Refugee Camps in Syria During WWII*

The whole world is aware that Europe is buckled under the biggest refugee crisis since World War II, with millions of people fleeing civil war and oppression in the Middle East, North Africa, and Western Asia, and landing on the continent’s shores by land and by sea. The U.N. estimates that more people have been displaced than at any time since the Second World War — there are close to 60 million war refugees, according to the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees.

While there is no denying the fact that the current humanitarian crisis is the worst refugee crisis of our generation; with continuous comparison to World War II, it is imperative that we share a small yet important fact with you: at the height of World War II, the Middle East Relief and Refugee Administration (MERRA) operated camps in Syria, Egypt and Palestine, where tens of thousands of people from across Europe sought refuge.

Yes, you read it right. Refugees crossed the same passageways [which the Syrians, the Africans, and the Asians are taking to reach Europe TODAY] 70 years ago — BUT they were the Europeans (largely from Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Turkey and Yugoslavia) trying to find solace in the Middle East.

U.S Army General Allen Gullion and Fred K. Hoehler, Director of the United Nation’s Division of Displaced Persons, stand before a map predicting the movement of European refugees of World War II


How The Refugees Entered The Camps:

According to the International Social Service records, refugees from Europe had to register at one of several camps in Egypt, Palestine and Syria and obtain camp-issued identification cards, which contained their full name, gender, marital status, passport number, and their educational and work history.

After registration, they had to undergo a refugee medical examination at makeshift hospital facilities — where they took off their clothes, their shoes and were washed until officials believed they were sufficiently disinfected. When they were declared fit enough to join the refugee camp, they were divided into living quarters for families, unaccompanied children, single men and single women.

How They Survived:

Refugees in MERRA camps received a half portion of Army rations each day; sometimes supplemented with foods that reflected refugees’ national customs and religious practices. ‘Rich’ refugees could buy beans, olives, oil, fruit, tea, coffee and other staples from camp canteens. On the rare occasion, during supervised visits to local shops, they could buy soap, razor blades, pencils, paper, stamps and other items. Some camps provided space for refugees to prepare meals; one camp in Aleppo reserved a room for women so they could make macaroni with flour, which they received from camp officials.

A group of women and a young girl launder clothes at refugee camps in El Shatt, Egypt and Bab Al-Hawa, near the Syria-Turkey border, in 1945


How They Found Work & Developed Skills:

Some, but not all, camps required refugees to work — though they were not forced to earn to make ends meet. GlobalPost reports:

“In Aleppo, refugees were encouraged, but not required, to work as cooks, cleaners and cobblers. Labour wasn’t mandatory in Nuseirat, either, but camp officials did try to create opportunities for refugees to use their skills in carpentry, painting, shoe making and wool spinning so that they could stay occupied and earn a little income from other refugees who could afford their services. At Moses Wells, all able-bodied, physically fit refugees worked as shopkeepers, cleaners, seamstresses, apprentices, masons, carpenters or plumbers, while “exceptionally qualified persons” served as school masters or labour foremen. Women performed additional domestic work like sewing, laundry, and preparing food on top of any other work they had.”

Croatian and Yugoslavian refugees work as cobblers at a refugee camp in El Shatt, Egypt during World War II.


How They Acquired Knowledge:

Margaret G. Arnstein, a prominent nurse practitioner notes that students in a few camps at El Shatt and Moses Wells were taught practical nursing, anatomy, physiology, first aid, obstetrics, paediatrics, as well as the military rules and regulations that governed wartime refugee camps.

How They Entertained Themselves:

In their free time, the men played handball, football and socialized over cigarettes, beer and wine in camp canteens. In their free time, children played with swings, slides and seesaws.

With pencils in short supply, young children at a World War II refugee camp in Tolumbat, Egypt write the words “naša škola” or “our school” into the sand


How They Prepared For A Brighter Future:

Education was a crucial part of camp routines. GlobalPost writes:

“Classrooms in Middle Eastern refugee camps had too few teachers and too many students, inadequate supplies and suffered from overcrowding. Yet not all the camps were so hard pressed. In Nuseirat, for example, a refugee who was an artist completed many paintings and posted them all over the walls of a kindergarten inside the camp, making the classrooms “bright and cheerful.” Well-to-do people in the area donated toys, games, and dolls to the kindergarten, causing a camp official to remark that it “compared favourably with many in the United States.”

Greek refugees who lived in a refugee camp in Moses Wells, Egypt from 1945 to 1948 reunite with family members on their island home of Samos



Related Topics:

Turkish Company Caught Selling Fake Life-jackets to Refugees*

Syrian Refugees Protect Woman from Sexual Harassment in Germany*

130,000 Refugees Vanished after Being Registered in Germany*

Refugee Children being Raped in Calais Camp*

Far-right Activists Impersonated Police, Attacked Refugees, Stole their Possessions in Calais*

Almost 130 Refugee Children Vanish after ‘Calais Jungle’ Demolition*

E.U. Throws Greece and Refugees to the Sharks*

Multiple Casualties in Bombing of Refugee Camp Near Aleppo *

Turkish Border Guards Shoot and Abuse Syrian Refugees*

Thirty Syrian Boys Raped in Turkish Refugee Camp*

Israeli Military Prison for Refusing to Join the IDF – this is my letter*

Israeli Military Prison for Refusing to Join the IDF – this is my letter*

Our prison uniforms are cast-offs from people in the US Army – so I wrote a letter to the man who once wore mine

By Tair Kaminer

Israeli soldiers stand guard at Gush Etzion junction in the West Bank Friday, March 4, 2016, after a Palestinian woman allegedly tried to run over a soldier with her car. AP


Tair Kaminer is a 19-year-old conscientious objector currently incarcerated in an Israeli military prison for refusing to do compulsory military service in the IDF.

Dear Mr Smith,

You don’t know me, but I feel as though we are really close.  For the past 20 days I have worn your shirt. At least, the shirt that was yours while you served in the American army.

Here’s the thing: I am sitting in an Israeli military prison. And our uniforms, here in the military prison, were donated to my country by your country.  Yes, it is really U.S. Army uniforms that we are wearing, the tiger-skinned uniforms, the uniforms of the Marines, and some of them still have the family names of the soldiers sewn on the right and left sides of the shirts.  And this time, I received your shirt with your nametag still sewn on the right side of the shirt.

I want to tell you why I am in prison.  I am sitting in prison because I refused to enlist in the Israeli army, because I am against the continuation of the policies of occupation in the occupied territories.  I requested to do alternative community service, but they are not letting me do that.  This time, when the prison uniform had a name on it, I thought of you.  I wondered what you would think, how you would feel about me wearing your uniform.

Tair Kaminer

I wonder who you are.  As one might expect, at the beginning I imagined you as a typical American, maybe chubby, a football fan, and maybe you have no idea what is happening here.  You are, perhaps, not aware that there is a very complex and sad conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians.  That actually, since the foundation of this country there have been horrible wars.

So it’s important for me to tell you, because I am wearing your shirt.  We have been in this situation for many years now.  A terrible situation where wars that keep on replaying themselves, over and over.  Thousands of people on each side have been killed as a result of this war.  The Palestinians live under Israeli occupation.  The significance of this is that they are refused the basic rights of life, liberty, security and dignity.

The Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip live under a heavy Israeli military presence, and about twice a year, the Israeli army also goes in and destroys the place.  And of course the Israelis are suffering from this situation as well.  We have a cycle of mourning that grows from year to year.  For years now, entire communities in Israel, near the city of Shderot next to Gaza, have lived with the reality of constantly running to the bomb shelters to avoid incoming missiles – not just during war times, but daily.  Huge populations of both soldiers and civilians live with trauma and anxiety.

If I can summarise, it is not safe here.  For anyone.  And the reason that this is connected to you is that your government is very involved.  The taxes you pay support these wars, meaning we receive a “security” budget, and in Israel, the meaning of “security” is really “occupation”, a siege and closure of the Palestinian population. For the security of Israelis, of course.

I didn’t get your shirt randomly; your country is a little more involved in the situation than simply donating old uniforms. So now that you know the situation, are you bothered by the fact that your clothes and your money are actually playing a part in occupying the Palestinian people? Do you sleep well at night knowing this?

Actually, I imagine you a bit differently.  I want to believe that you are a person who is active in your society, simply because it would be nice if the person whose shirt I wore was a significant person in his society. And that you are very aware of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. You even are sometimes critical of Israel. And you also know that you are not anti-Semitic just because you are against the occupation and support non-violent action against it, because Israel is committing crimes and it is important for you as a world citizen not to lend your hand to this. You are concerned about how your money is being used, and that’s fantastic.

But I wonder if you make the connection, on a higher level, between what is happening in your city or state and what is happening across the sea where we live.  Because we too, here in the Middle East, are hugely influenced by the policies there in the U.S.

I’ll explain.  It’s very important to blame Israel for this whole problem.  But that’s not enough.  You see, the atmosphere in Israel lately has become more and more violent, racist, and extremist, and our government is responsible for this; but your government continues to caress my government’s head.

Yes, I know that sometimes there is tension and I know that sometimes Bibi does stupid things in his relationship with you, but at the end of the day, you are giving the atrocities here protection:  unofficial permission, but still very significant.  So please, enough.  Enough to the cooperation, enough to channelling money to support the occupation, enough to sending war equipment, enough to the hypocritical involvement that maintains the status quo.

I am asking you, as the one who is wearing your old shirt, that you apply a little pressure there in the U.S. and don’t just give your government the legitimisation to support the crimes that are happening here.

It’s suddenly hit me that it’s possible you have actually died.  I mean, you are also a soldier, you also served in a violent campaign, and maybe the power struggles killed you too. Maybe you lost your life as well.  Maybe you had a family and children who became orphans because of some pig that wanted money. He didn’t think at all about your mother, who lost her child, while he bought a new car. He didn’t think about your sister who lost her big brother while he bought off the decision-makers so he could continue to get richer. I am sure he also didn’t think about your best friend; he probably just went quietly off to sleep.

I’m sorry, Smith, I didn’t think about that – and now I feel a little bad.  You are just like the many Palestinians, the many Israelis: a victim.  A victim of governments supporting wars and perpetuating injustice.

So Smith, I am sitting here in prison for you as well, because I am not willing to take part in the injustice that killed you and is killing many others. Thankyou for accompanying me on this struggle for a better world that I believe is possible – it’s possible for your children, and it’s possible for mine.

Tair Kaminer


Related Topics:

Deir Yassin, the Beginning of the Palestinian Holocaust. 1948*

Palestine Before Israel*

Palestine from Sovereignty to an Israeli Enclave*

Harvesting Palestinian Organs*

Tools of Israeli Torture of Palestinian Children*

Israeli Soldier Strangle-holds Palestinian Boy*

Palestinian Child Beaten to Death after Being Shot by Military*

Palestinian Children Message to the World*

Watch Israeli Occupation Forces Shooting Palestinian Demonstrators*

Israeli Forces Invade Palestinian Hospitals*

Israel Harvesting Slain Palestinians’ Organs*

U.S. Silent on U.S. Citizens Engage in Violence against Palestinians*

The Butcher of Khuza’a*

DEBKA Report: Saudi, Egypt and Israel Orchestrated Palestinian Holocaust*

Blair’s Next Leg of The Global leaders Silence on the Palestinian Holocaust and Piping Gas to the E.U.

Egypt Signs Contract to Import Palestinian Natural Gas from Israel*

Israel Prevents Release of Palestinian Tax Revenues*

72 Percent of Aid to Palestine Ends Up ‘In Israeli Hands*

For Greater Israel: 3,200 acres of Palestinian Land Near Jerusalem*

Israel Says “Go to Hell” to E.U. Recognition of Palestinian Statehood*

Palestine Ends Two-State System, Returns to Occupied Status*

Woman Who Led Palestinian Bid for ICC Membership Arrested 24hrs of Succeeding*

Threats from the U.S. as Palestine Submits Formal Complaint to ICC*

Israeli Geneticist: Ashkenazi Jews come from Turkey, not Palestine*

The Root Cause of the Never-Ending Conflict in Palestine; and How to Fix It*

Palestinians Call to end Israeli Occupation*

Palestine Demands Israeli Withdrawal by 2016*

Livingstone Vindicated: There WAS a Nazi-Zionist agreement with Hitler*

Livingstone Vindicated: There WAS a Nazi-Zionist agreement with Hitler*

Ken Livingstone


It turns out all those who clamoured for Ken Livingstone to be suspended from the Labour Party – on the basis that Nazi Germany and Zionist Jews never had an agreement – were completely wrong.

Perhaps John Mann needs to reconsider his actions of earlier today (April 28) – along with all those who accused Livingstone of “rewriting history” when he really was simply quoting it.

Vox Political is grateful to the reader who sent us to the Wikipedia page stating the following:

“The Haavara Agreement was an agreement between Nazi Germany and Zionist German Jews signed on 25 August 1933.

The agreement was finalized after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany.

The agreement was designed to help facilitate the emigration of German Jews to Palestine.

While it helped Jews emigrate, it forced them to temporarily give up possessions to Germany before departing. Those possessions could later be re-obtained by transferring them to Palestine as German export goods.

The agreement was controversial at the time, and was criticised by many Jewish leaders both within the Zionist movement and outside it.

Hitler’s own support of the Haavara Agreement was unclear and varied throughout the 1930s.
Initially, Hitler criticized the agreement, but reversed his opinion and supported it in the period 1937-1939.”


Related Topics:

Hitler: The War on Jews that was Started by Ashkenazi Jews!*

Germany to Represent Israel in Islamic Countries*

Israeli Geneticist: Ashkenazi Jews come from Turkey, not Palestine*

Britain’s Guardian Newspaper now Owned by a Jewish Supremacist*

Plugging into U.K. Jewish Networks as the Key to Success for the Ambitious *

Zionists Argue for the Boycott of Israel*

U.K.’s Israeli Lobby gets a Seat on the House of Lords*

A Self-Described Passionate Zionist in Charge of U.K. Government Cybersecurity*

Jewish First and Betrayal of Britain*

Former Bush Official Just Confirmed That Our Wars Are for Corporate Interests*

Former Bush Official Just Confirmed That Our Wars Are for Corporate Interests*

By Claire Bernish

United States — “I think Smedley Butler was onto something,” Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former George W. Bush administration heavyweight, told Salon in an exclusive interview.

Major General Smedley Butler earned the highest rank in the U.S. Marine Corps, accumulating numerous accolades as he helped lead the United States through decades of war. He later became an ardent critic of such militarism and imperialism.

“War is a racket,” Butler famously said, and Wilkerson — who has also turned critical of U.S. imperialist policy — agrees with and admires the esteemed Marine.

Wilkerson, who served as chief of staff to former secretary of state, Colin Powell, has grown tired of “the corporate interests that we go abroad to slay monsters for.”

Of the profiteering scheme that wars have come to embody, Wilkerson quoted Butler:

“Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.”

Noting Butler’s brief but accurate characterization of what Eisenhower called the military-industrial complex, Wilkerson added that today’s war machine “is more pernicious than Eisenhower ever thought it would be.”

The willingness of such weapons and military equipment corporations to excuse the transgressions of repressive and abusive regimes in the Middle East and Asia for the sake of profit, Wilkerson asserted, stands as evidence Eisenhower underestimated the extent the to which the problem would manifest.

“Was Bill Clinton’s expansion of NATO — after George H. W. Bush and [his Secretary of State] James Baker had assured Gorbachev and then Yeltsin that we wouldn’t go an inch further east — was this for Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon, and Boeing, and others, to increase their network of potential weapons sales?” Wilkerson asked.

“You bet it was,” he answered his own question.

“Is there a penchant on behalf of the Congress,” he continued, “to bless the use of force more often than not because of the constituencies they have and the money they get from the defence contractors?

“You bet.

“It’s not like Dick Cheney or someone like that went and said let’s have a war because we want to make money for Halliburton,” Wilkerson explained, describing such decision-making as “pernicious.”

Taking his description a step further, Wilkerson characterized those corporations flooding congressional elections and political PACs with cash as “another pernicious influence.”

Relating another ill of the U.S. war machine, Wilkerson re-pined the creep of privatization of “public functions, like prisons,” for which the former Bush official places greatest blame on Republicans — though Democrats appear as eager about the shift. Salon mentioned Hillary Clinton’s speech from 2011, during her tenure as Secretary of State, in which she stated,

It’s time for the United States to start thinking of Iraq as a business opportunity.”

Indeed, journalist Jeremy Scahill extensively reported and investigated the enormous army of private contractors operating in Iraq and Afghanistan — with a particular focus on Blackwater. Run by notorious mercenary Erik Prince — who recently became the subject of an investigation by the Dept. of Justice and other federal agencies — Blackwater appeared to operate so unpredictably as to essentially be a rogue organization.

Scahill penned an article for the Guardian in 2007, revealing the exact troubles with privatization Wilkerson referred to — there were 48,000 ‘private contractors’ working for 630 companies in varying capacities in Iraq.

“In many respects,” Wilkerson continued, “it is now private interests that benefit most from our use of military force. Whether it’s private security contractors, that are still all over Iraq or Afghanistan, or it’s the bigger-known defence contractors, like the number one in the world, Lockheed Martin.”

Contractors have arguably done the most to damage U.S.’ international relations and accountability than any other factor — except for the corporations paying them. All of this profit for belligerence has clearly benefited one de facto policy: American imperialism.

“We now dwarf the Russians or anyone else who sells weapons in the world,” Wilkerson noted.

“We are the death merchant of the world.”

Now, Wilkerson worried, “We’ve privatized the ultimate public function: war.”


Related Topics:

The Secret Oil War Has Begun*

Europe is Built on Corpses and Plunder*

Former Bush Official ‘The Ship Is Sinking’*

U.S., Britain and Israel are the Biggest Terrorists on the Planet.

Catastrophe in Saudi Arabia, Pillar of Washington’s Middle East Policy*

What I’ve Learnt About US Foreign Policy*

The Rothschild’s Zionist World Order*

Rapidly Declining U.S. Exports*

U.S. Soldier: “The Real Terrorist Was Me and the Real Terrorism is This Occupation”

10 Examples of the CIA Using Secret Armies to Overthrow Foreign Governments*

Slavery: The Anniversary of the Official Ending of a System that Bankrolled and Civilized Cameron’s British Empire*

Lord Rothschild ‘The Tide is Turning’*

Lord Rothschild ‘The Tide is Turning’*

As central bank policy-makers’ forecasts have become more pessimistic (i.e. more realistic), Lord Rothschild is unsurprised at the current malaise:

“not surprisingly, market conditions have deteriorated further…So much so that the wind is certainly not behind us; indeed we may well be in the eye of a storm.”

On this basis, Rothschild highlights a “daunting litany of problems,” warning those who are optimistically sanguine about the U.S. economy that “2016 is likely to turn out to be more difficult than the second half of 2015.”

Lord Rothschild Letter to Investors (via RIT Capital):

In my half-yearly statement I sounded a note of caution, ending up by writing that “the climate is one where the wind may well not be behind us”; indeed we became increasingly concerned about global equity markets during the last quarter of 2015, reducing our exposure to equities as the economic outlook darkened and many companies reported disappointing earnings. Meanwhile central banks’ policy makers became more pessimistic in their economic forecasts for, despite unprecedented monetary stimulus, growth remained anaemic.

Not surprisingly, market conditions have deteriorated further. So much so that the wind is certainly not behind us; indeed we may well be in the eye of a storm.

The litany of problems which confronts investors is daunting:

  • The QE tap is in the course of being turned off and in any event its impact in stimulating asset prices is coming to an end.
  • There’s the slowing down to an unknown extent in China.
  • The situation in the Middle East is likely to be irresolvable at least for some time ahead.
  • Progress of the U.S. and European economies is disappointing.
  • The Greek situation remains fraught with the country now having to cope with the challenge of unprecedented immigration.
  • Over the last few years we have witnessed an explosion in debt, much of it repayable in re-valued dollars by emerging market countries at the time of a collapse in commodity prices. Countries like Brazil, Russia, Nigeria, Ukraine and Kazakhstan are, as a result, deeply troubled.
  • In the U.K. we have an unsettled political situation as we attempt to deal with the possibility of Brexit in the coming months.

The risks that confront investors are clearly considerable at a time when stock market valuations remain relatively high.

There are, however, some influential and thoughtful investment managers who remain sanguine about markets in 2016 on the grounds that the U.S. economy is in decent shape – outside of manufacturing – while they feel that economic conditions may be improving. To them, the decline in these markets may have more to do with sentiment than substance. Others are less optimistic but feel that the odds remain against these potential difficulties materialising in a form which would undermine global equity markets.

However our view is that 2016 is likely to turn out to be more difficult than the second half of 2015. Our policy will be towards a greater emphasis on seeking absolute returns. We will remain highly selective when considering public and private investment opportunities. Reflecting this policy, our quoted equity exposure has been reduced to 43% of net asset value.

There’s an old saying that in difficult times the return of capital takes precedence over the return on capital. Our principle will therefore be to exercise caution in all things in the current year, while remaining agile where opportunities present themselves. Problems have a habit of creating opportunities and I remain confident of our ability to identify and profit from them during 2016.

Perhaps Lord Rothschild is on to something…




End Rothschild




Related Topics:

Rothschild Establishes Billionaire Tax Haven Inside America*

Rothschild Bank Now Under Criminal Investigation*

Former Bush Official ‘The Ship Is Sinking’*

Bank Bail-outs Behind Behind U.K.’s Collapsing Public Services*

Clinton Case ‘criminal,’ Grand Jury Convened*

Scalia Murdered After Obama Meeting*

Pope Francis Found Guilty Of Child Trafficking, Rape, Murder*

Cameron’s Mother and Aunt Protest against his Cruel Cuts to Children’s Services*

E.U. Refuses to give Cameron the 4-year Ban on E.U. Migrant Benefits*

The Welsh Assembly Blocks Cameron’s Trade Union Bill*

Shell Oil Faces Second Lawsuit in Five Years over Spills in Nigeria*

French Journalist Arrested for Exposing Israeli Connection to Paris False Flag*

Pegida-U.K. — Smoke, Mirrors and Zionism*

Beware of the Fake ‘Alien Invasion’

Vladimir Putin’s Address on the Cessation of Hostilities in Syria*

The U.S. Military Court Recent Decisions, and the Black Vote*

Johnson and Johnson Ordered to Pay $72M for Knowingly Causing Cancer with Product*

U.S. Sends 5,000 Tons of Ammunition to Germany ‘to help NATO alliance’*

Bush Family Fortune Made in Nazi Germany*

Bush Family Fortune Made in Nazi Germany*

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky

George W. Bush’s Grandfather, Senator Prescott Bush

“A  famous American family” made its fortune from the Nazis, according to John Loftus’ documented historical analysis.    

The Bush family links to Nazi Germany’s war economy were first brought to light at the Nuremberg trials in the testimony of Nazi Germany’s steel magnate Fritz Thyssen. Thyssen was a partner of George W. Bush’s grandfather Prescott Bush: 

From 1945 until 1949 in Nuremberg, one of the lengthiest and, it now appears, most futile interrogations of a Nazi war crimes suspect began in the American Zone of Occupied Germany.

Multibillionaire steel magnate Fritz Thyssen-the man whose steel combine was the cold heart of the Nazi war machine-talked and talked and talked to a joint U.S. –U.K. interrogation team.

… What the Allied investigators never understood was that they were not asking Thyssen the right question. Thyssen did not need any foreign bank accounts because his family secretly owned an entire chain of banks.

He did not have to transfer his Nazi assets at the end of World War II, all he had to do was transfer the ownership documents – stocks, bonds, deeds and trusts–from his bank in Berlin through his bank in Holland to his American friends in New York City: Prescott Bush and Herbert Walker [father in law of Prescott Bush]. Thyssen’s partners in crime were the father and [grandfather] of a future President of the United States [George Herbert Walker Bush]. (John Loftus, How the Bush family made its fortune from the Nazis: The Dutch Connection, Global Research, February 2002, edit by GR)

The American public is not aware of the links of the Bush family to Nazi Germany because the historical record has been carefully withheld by the mainstream media.

In September 2004, however, The Guardian revealed that:

“George Bush’s grandfather, the late U.S. senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the U.S. National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.

His business dealings, which continued until his company’s assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, has led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages being brought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and to a hum of pre-election controversy.

The evidence has also prompted one former US Nazi war crimes prosecutor to argue that the late senator’s action should have been grounds for prosecution for giving aid and comfort to the enemy. (Ben Aris and Duncan Campbell, How the Bush’s Grandfather Helped Hitlers Rise to Power,   Guardian, September 25, 2004)”

The Guardian article was published on September 25, 2004 at the height of the U.S. election campaign which led to the re-election of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney on Tuesday November 2nd 2004.

Deafening silence. The U.S. media provided no coverage of GWB’s family history. Had the American people known that the Bush family had links to Nazi Germany, John Kerry would have won the presidency in 2004 in a landslide.

Similarly, Michael Dukakis would have won the presidency in 1989 against George Herbert Walker Bush. In fact, had this been revealed to the American people in the wake of the Nuremberg trials (1945-1949), Bush Senior would never have entered politics and his father Prescott Bush would never have become Senator.

Is there a pattern?  Do you have to be a wealthy war criminal to accede to high office?

Prescott Bush had links to Nazi Germany, Bush Senior and George W. Bush had links to the Bin Laden Family…

What must be ensured to protect American democracy is that none of these “awkward truths” which reveal the crimes committed by prominent politicians be the object of media coverage. Needless to say, propaganda is essential to uphold the legitimacy of presidential candidates in the eyes of public opinion.

War Crimes. Crimes against Humanity

Nazi war crimes with the complicity of Wall Street and Bush family?

U.S. war crimes committed by Bush Junior in Iraq (2003), Bush Senior (the Gulf War, 1991), Is there a relationship?

What was the role of the late senator Prescott Bush in his dealing with Nazi Germany?

While the president’s [George W. Bush] father had dealings with the bin Ladens, his grandfather [Prescott Bush] made a considerable share of the family fortune through his dealings with Nazi Germany. Some have suggested that the Bushes’ assets have their ultimate source, in part, in the exploitation of slave labo6r at Auschwitz itself.

Loftus argues that this money—a substantial sum at that time—included direct profit from the slave labour of those who died at Auschwitz.

In an interview with journalist Toby Rogers, the former prosecutor said: “It is bad enough that the Bush family helped raise the money for Thyssen to give Hitler his start in the 1920s, but giving aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war is treason. The Bush bank helped the Thyssens make the Nazi steel that killed Allied soldiers. As bad as financing the Nazi war machine may seem, aiding and abetting the Holocaust was worse. Thyssen’s coal mines used Jewish slaves as if they were disposable chemicals. There are six million skeletons in the Thyssen family closet, and a myriad of criminal and historical questions to be answered about the Bush family’s complicity.”

Prescott Bush was by no means unique, though his financial connections with the Third Reich were perhaps more intimate than most. Henry Ford was an avowed admirer of Hitler, and together GM and Ford played the predominant role in producing the military trucks that carried German troops across Europe. After the war, both auto companies demanded and received reparations for damage to their German plants caused by allied bombing. (Bill Venn, A presidential visit to Auschwitz, The Holocaust and the Bush family fortune, WSWS.org,  5 June 2003)

Evidence of the Bush family’s links to Nazism was available well before George Herbert Walker Bush (Senior) and George W. Bush entered politics. According to John Buchanan (New Hampshire Gazette, 10 October 2003):

“After 60 years of inattention and even denial by the U.S. media, newly-uncovered government documents in The National Archives and Library of Congress reveal that Prescott Bush, the grandfather of President George W. Bush, served as a business partner of and U.S. banking operative for the financial architect of the Nazi war machine from 1926 until 1942, when Congress took aggressive action against Bush and his “enemy national” partners.

The documents also show that Bush and his colleagues, according to reports from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, tried to conceal their financial alliance with German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, a steel and coal baron who, beginning in the mid-1920s, personally funded Adolf Hitler’s rise to power by the subversion of democratic principle and German law. Furthermore, the declassified records demonstrate that Bush and his associates, who included E. Roland Harriman, younger brother of American icon W. Averell Harriman, and George Herbert Walker, President Bush’s maternal great-grandfather, continued their dealings with the German industrial tycoon for nearly a year after the U.S. entered the war.”

While Prescott Bush’s “company’s assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, George W. Bush’s grandfather was never prosecuted for his business dealings with  Nazi Germany.

In 1952, Prescott Bush was elected to the U.S. Senate, with no press accounts about his well-concealed Nazi past. There is no record of any U.S. press coverage of the Bush-Nazi connection during any political campaigns conducted by George Herbert Walker Bush, Jeb Bush, or George W. Bush, with the exception of a brief mention in an unrelated story in the Sarasota Herald Tribune in November 2000 and a brief but inaccurate account in The Boston Globe in 2001. (John Buchanan, op. cit)

Up until Pearl Harbor (December 1941), Wall Street was trading with the enemy. In the wake of Pearl Harbor, Standard Oil continued to sell oil to Nazi Germany through the intermediation of so-called “neutral countries” including Venezuela and Argentina.


Related Topics:

Congress Removes Ban on Funding Neo-Nazis*

German Group Files War Crimes Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Other CIA Officials*

Bush’s War on Terror in the Philippines*

Call for Rumsfeld and Bush to Be Indicted

Canada: Now Bush Reappears on the Scene

Bush and Blair Found Guilty…

George W. Bush on the Run…

Assassination of JFK, the Bush Connection

Blair, Bush and Cameron: Deluded in their Hi-jack of God*

Occupy World: Judge Pursues Probe against Bush and Cheney*

Hillary Clinton George W. Bush’s Sister in Law*

Clinton Case ‘criminal,’ Grand Jury Convened*

The Bush Syndicate: Kansas Children for Sale*

Venezuela Bans ‘Terrorists’ Bush, and Cheney *

Bush Cancels Europe Trip Amidst Calls for his Arrest*