Archive | May 2, 2017

Parental Rights under Attack (Again) … with California’s SB18*

Parental Rights under Attack (Again) … with California’s SB18*

By Carolanne Wright

“I have very profound feelings about parental rights and responsibilities and great dismay in American society over the decades how much that parental right, that parental responsibility has diminished.” ~ California State Senator Jim Nielsen

Parental rights is a hot topic in the U.S. these days, as more parents feel an increasing encroachment by the government into how they raise their family. Now, this ongoing issue between parents and the State has reached an all new level with the introduction of bill SB18, otherwise known as the “Bill of Rights for the Children and Youth of California.”

Supporters claim the bill will help parents to act in the child’s best interest, by providing a safe and healthy environment. They say it’s a “push for a more child-centered approach to life in the Golden State.” But parental rights organizations and activists say the bill has a dark side — one that will lead to mandatory home visits, invade our privacy, and compromise the authority of parents. Ultimately, they believe, it’s a slippery slope toward state-regulated parenting that can jeopardize families, and potentially break them apart altogether. Here’s why…

Controversial Bill Faces Fierce Opposition

On the face of it, SB18 appears to have benign and honourable intentions. After all, who doesn’t want their children to have a solid education, access to good healthcare, live in a safe environment and have emotional well-being?

However, on closer inspection, critics point out the bill severely threatens parental rights and children themselves.

Del Bigtree, producer of the documentary Vaxxed, explains in a Facebook video that many are concerned about the vague language of the bill, where it operates under the assumption that children are to be protected from their own parents. He says the language is dangerous and puts the state in control of your children. Bigtree feels it’s essentially an anti-parenting bill.

Michelle Ford, President and found of the Vaccine Injury Awareness League, agrees.

“This legislation is frightening on so many levels, and is especially horrific to members of the vaccine-injured community,” she said.

“To imply that parents may have to submit to an in-home visitation program because they may be seeking an alternative to ‘evidence-based theories,’ which could easily be bought science such as mandatory vaccinations, is an outrage, which is exactly what SB18 is saying.”

Ford believes the bill paves the way for “egregious acts of medical kidnapping and other abuses.”

Some take issue with the fact that the legislation is based on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, a treaty which compromises the sovereignty of the United States and is in conflict with U.S. laws concerning privacy and family rights.

Others find the author of the bill — Dr. Richard Pan, a paediatrician turned California Senator — to be a problem. Pan is known for his prominent role in passing SB277, a highly contentious bill that removed religious and personal vaccination exemptions in California, thereby requiring all children attending public and private schools to be vaccinated, unless they could secure a medical exemption. Pan has been under fire since his involvement with the legislation, some claiming he was bought-off by the pharmaceutical industry.

“According to, which tracks campaign contributions, Pan has … received money from Genentech, a company that develops drugs “to address significant unmet medical needs” ($1,500); Tenet Healthcare, a Dallas-based corporation providing “leading healthcare services” around the country such as vaccinations ($4,100); Gilead Sciences, a “research-based biopharmaceutical company” ($1,500); mega-health care corporation Johnson & Johnson ($4,100); BioMarin Pharmaceuticals, which “develops and commercializes innovative biopharmaceuticals for serious diseases and medical conditions” ($1,000); Eli Lilly, a global Big Pharma corporation which developed a number of vaccines including the SARS vaccine and which won protection from autism lawsuits shortly after the turn of the century ($4,100); biopharmaceutical firm AmGen ($1,000); McKesson Corporation, a pharmaceutical distributor ($1,000); drugstore chain Rite Aid ($1,000); and others.” [source]

He was also previously involved in passing another controversial bill concerning the vaccine Gardasil.

“Dr. Pan was among more than two dozen California lawmakers who received campaign donations on record from Merck in the 2010 election cycle, ahead of supporting a 2011 law allowing girls as young as 12 years old to receive Gardasil vaccinations for HPV (manufactured by Merck) without parental consent.” [source]

As Del Bigtree points out, Senator Pan has lost credibility and the trust of his constituents because he has not followed through on his promises — such as assuring the public that doctors would not be persecuted for signing medical vaccine exemptions, when in fact, the opposite occurred as soon as the legislation was passed. He also doesn’t sit down and talk with his constituents, but instead runs from discussion.

Bigtree strongly recommends that those who live in California — and disagree with SB18 — contact their representatives before the legislation moves forward. Already we’ve seen positive changes made to the draft bill due to public outcry, with the most contentious chapter, 18987.84 to be “inoperative on November 30, 2024, and, as of January 1, 2025, is repealed.” California state legislators contact information can be found here.

For more information, have a look at No On SB18.

Overruled: Government Invasion of your Parental Rights


Related Topics:

Pennsylvania Bill SB 217 Takes Away Parents’ Right to Object to Child Vaccinations*

New York Redefines Biological Parental Rights*

Vaccine Rights without the Parents!

Toddler Permanently Brain Damaged by a Mystery Combination Vaccination That Her Parent’s Did Not Consent To*

A School Field Trip turns was a Trip to Get Birth Control Implants without Parental Consent*

Parents Told Five Times to Abort Boy with ‘no brain’ – Now He’s a Thriving 4-year-old*


15k Sexual Assaults by U.S. Military in 2016*

15k Sexual Assaults by U.S. Military in 2016*

A new report from the Pentagon has revealed that there were around 14,900 sexual assaults in the U.S. military last year, ranging from groping to rape. The majority of those who reported such incidents faced retaliation.

Although a total of 6,172 sexual assault reports were filed in fiscal 2016, that figure represents only a fraction of the actual number of incidents that took place, as many victims do not officially report the crimes.

To better understand the actual number of sexual assaults, the Pentagon combined the official reports with the results of an anonymous survey which it conducts every two years.

After compiling the two sets of data, the Defense Department found that there were around 14,900 incidents of sexual assault in the military last year, ranging from groping to rape.

The significant discrepancy between official reports and informal survey responses is largely due to fears of retaliation for reporting sexual assault.

According to the report, 58% of victims experienced reprisals or retaliation for reporting sexual assault.

“Today’s report disappointingly shows a flat overall reporting rate and a retaliation rate against survivors that remains at an unacceptable six out of 10 for a third year in a row,” Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said in a statement following the report’s release.

Navy Rear Adm. Ann Burkhardt, director of the Pentagon’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office, acknowledged the issue of retaliation, saying it is a critical area which is still being addressed by the Defense Department, according to The Washington Post.

Progress isn’t success

Despite the large number of sexual assaults that took place last year that number is actually at its lowest since the military began surveying service members about a decade ago. To put last year’s figure in perspective, there were 20,300 cases in 2014, and a whopping 34,000 in 2006.

Furthermore, even though the number of incidents went down in 2016, reporting of incidents went up from the year prior. In fact, the 6,172 reports filed last year represent a record high.

However, Elizabeth Van Winkle, performing the duties of assistant secretary of defence for readiness, said the numbers don’t mean the issue is solved.

“The fight to end sexual assault, sexual harassment, and related misconduct in the military is far from over,” she said at a press conference, as quoted by Reuters.

“We do not confuse progress with success.”

The report comes as the U.S. military, particularly the Marines, is embroiled in a scandal which saw the nude photographs of service members being shared without their permission, in a saga known as ‘Marines United.’

The Marines United investigation is focused on about 1,200 people, including 725 active-duty service members, an official told reporters last month.


Related Topics:

Over 100 U.N. Peacekeepers ran a Child Sex Ring in Haiti, and were ever Jailed*

Dyncorp, the Private Military Corporation at the Heart of U.S. Foreign Policy Scandal*

Former Dyncorp VP Charged With Rape Of a Minor*

Dallas Mum Discovers New Secret Service Sex scandals through Public Information Requests*

Japan Officially asked the U.S. to Stop Military-related Rapes*

The International Criminal Court is investigating U.S. War Crimes, with a Huge Catch*

Child Abuse – The Scourge of the West*

U.S. Sponsors Rape in Congo*

US Military Sexually Abused 54 Colombian Children*

U.S. Rape and Sodomy of Iraqi Women and Children*

U.S. Soldiers Raping Afghan Women*

More Paedophiles Exposed Amongst U.S. Military and U.K. Politicians!

Senator Arrested for Child Prostitution after Being Caught with Teen Boy*

Ex- House Speaker Says Child He Raped Should Pay Back Hush Money Since He Broke His Silence*

S. Korean Women Sue US Military for Forced Prostitution*

FBI Investigate Child Sex Ring Within U.S. Police Force*


German Soldier ‘posed as Syrian Asylum-seeker to Carry out Terror Attack and Blame it on Refugees’*

German Soldier ‘posed as Syrian Asylum-seeker to Carry out Terror Attack and Blame it on Refugees’*

The lieutenant, who has not been identified, was living a double life


By Justin Huggler

An officer in the German army who spent more than a year posing as a Syrian refugee has been arrested on suspicion of planning a terror attack.

The 28-year-old lieutenant, who has not been named under German privacy laws, was living a double life, prosecutors said on Thursday.

Police are believed to be working on the theory that the officer, who has a history of expressing anti-foreigner views, planned to carry out a “false flag” terror attack and blame it on refugees.

No details of the suspected terror plot have been released.

The arrested man successfully posed as Syrian asylum-seeker despite the fact he is of German background and speaks no Arabic.

He spent some time living in an official refugee shelter and was paid benefits as an asylum-seeker.

“This is quite an unusual story,” a spokesman for prosecutors in Frankfurt said.

“It’s more than strange. We will have to wait for the investigation to uncover his motives.”

The officer first came to the authorities’ attention in February, when he was arrested by Austrian police after being caught trying to hide a gun in a toilet at Vienna airport.

Although he was swiftly released, German police and the MAD military intelligence service began investigating him, and uncovered an extraordinary trail of evidence.

To investigators’ astonishment, they found that the lieutenant, who was posted to a joint Franco-German unit in France, was also living some of the time as a Syrian asylum-seeker at a refugee shelter in Germany.

He first presented himself as an asylum-seeker in December 2015, in the midst of the influx of more than 1 million migrants who flooded into the country under Angela Merkel’s “open-door” refugee policy.

He was given a place to stay in a refugee shelter in the town of Giessen, near Frankfurt, and formally applied for asylum under a false name in January 2016.

Prosecutors were at a loss to explain how he was able to register as a Syrian asylum-seeker despite the fact he speaks no Arabic and is not believed to be of Syrian origin. The authorities raised no suspicion at the time of his application.

He is believed to have continued living sporadically at a refugee shelter in the months that followed, dividing his time between there and the military base in France where he was posted.

“Just because he was stationed in France does not mean that he had to stay there every day. He was able to move freely during his free time,” a police spokesman said.

One theory being pursued by investigators is that he may have posed as a refugee to set up a false trail of evidence ahead of a terror attack. According to this theory, he would have deliberately left his fingerprints at the scene of an attack so they would lead back to the fake refugee.

A second man, a 24-year-old student from the officer’s home town of Offenbach, has also been arrested in connection with the case. Prosecutors described him as an “accomplice”, though they gave no details of his role in the alleged plot.

“We know from various voice recordings that both men had anti-foreigner views,” the prosecutors’ spokesman said.


Related Topics:

Mass Sexual Assault by Refugees in Germany was Fake News*

Children Sexually Assaulted at E.U.’s Official Refugee Camps*

Who Is Responsible for Sexual Violence in Europe?*

Fake News on Muslim Attack on German Church*

130,000 Refugees Vanished after Being Registered in Germany*

Belgian Reporter Sexually Assaulted by 3 White Men in Cologne*

Teenage Girl Admits Making up Migrant Rape Claim That Outraged Germany*

Far-right Activists Impersonated Police, Attacked Refugees, Stole their Possessions in Calais*

Syrian Refugees Protect Woman from Sexual Harassment in Germany*

Refugees Donate Time and Money to Help Italian Earthquake Victims*

French Caught Planning an ISIS False Flag Terror Attack on the French*

Putin: ‘95% of World Terrorist Attacks are Orchestrated By The CIA’*

“Jack the Ripper” was Winston Churchill’s Father*

“Jack the Ripper” was Winston Churchill’s Father*

According to John Hamer, the Masonic ritual murder of four prostitutes was carried out by Winston Churchill’s father. The prostitutes were blackmailing the royal family.

Lord Randolph Spencer Churchill, 1849-1895


“Churchill was not only the ‘brains’ behind the entire operation, but he was also personally responsible for the cutting of Masonic emblems and symbols into the bodies of the victims, whilst William Gull’s surgeon’s hands  performed the organ removals.”

“Naturally, Eddy absolutely enraged the establishment with his ‘illicit’ marriage which threatened to spark a constitutional crisis of major proportions.  So, as is always the case, the monarchy set in motion a huge cover-up operation. “

By John Hamer

The story begins in the late summer of 1888, the heyday of Queen Victoria’s reign, in the gas-lit streets of London, when a woman’s horrifically mutilated body was discovered in a tawdry slum street in the Whitechapel area of East London….

On the evening of the 31st August 1888, the body of Mary Ann Nicholls, a common prostitute, was found. She had been brutally hacked to death. Her throat had been slit and her torso internal organs exposed.  She was the first of five victims of the now legendary killer, ‘Jack the Ripper’.

The so-called ‘Ripper’ murders came under the jurisdiction of the London Metropolitan Police Force and in particular Inspector Frederick George Abberline.

It is important to note that the diaries of Frederick Abberline did not see light of day until around 70 years after the unsolved murders. They were in the possession of Walter Sickert, art tutor to Prince Albert Victor, the Duke of Clarence, otherwise known by his colloquial name of ‘Prince Eddy’.

Eddy was the eldest son of Albert Edward the Prince of Wales (later King Edward VII) and Princess Alexandra (later Queen Alexandra), the grandson of the reigning monarch, Queen Victoria and older brother of the future king of England, King George V.  As such, he would have been first in line to the throne.

Unfortunately, due to centuries of Royal in-breeding, Eddy was partially deaf and of well below average intelligence. He was thus shunned by the majority of his cold-hearted family.

Queen Victoria, the reigning monarch at the time was a great supporter and patron of Freemasonry as were all the Royal males of the age (and as they still are today).  Indeed, the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family (the current British royals) had sponsored the rise of Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati.  Weishaupt was indeed born and raised in the Bavarian town of Gotha.

There are several Masonic lodges in the Royal palaces of Britain, the most significant one perhaps being the Royal Alpha Lodge in Kensington Palace.  In 1885 Prince Eddy was initiated into the Royal Alpha Lodge at the behest of his father.


As well as his membership of the lodge, Eddy was also a regular ‘customer’ at a homosexual-paedophile brothel in Cleveland Street, London; and indiscreetly instigated a series of explicit love-letters with a young boy employed at these premises.

The well-known Satanist, Aleister Crowley had these letters in his possession for many years but eventually they were lost or more likely destroyed.

Eddy had also made a young Catholic ‘commoner’ of Irish descent by the name of Annie Elizabeth Crook, pregnant with his child.

Eddy had foolishly married her in a clandestine church service and this in effect barred him from ever becoming king as British royals are not permitted to marry Catholics, let alone a commoner bearing an illegitimate child.

In 1883, Eddy’s mother, Princess Alexandra, had asked the young painter Walter Sickert to introduce Eddy to the artistic and literary life of London.

Sickert’s studio was at 15 Cleveland Street near to Tottenham Court Road in north London.  He duly introduced the teenage Prince to many of the area’s ‘bohemian types’, including the theatrical friends he had made when he had been a minor member of the Lyceum Company.

Sickert also introduced Eddy to one of his models, a pretty Irish Catholic girl, the afore-mentioned Annie Crook who lived nearby at 6 Cleveland Street and who worked by day in a local tobacconist’s shop.

They fell for each other and, according to Sickert, went through two clandestine marriage ceremonies, one Anglican and one Catholic.  Soon afterwards Annie became pregnant and her employer needed someone to fill in for her during her confinement.

Walter Sickert was asked if he knew anyone suitable and, after consulting friends, found a young girl called Mary Jean Kelly from the Providence Row Night Refuge for Women in Whitechapel.

For some months, Mary worked alongside Annie Crook in the shop and the two became friends.  In due course, on the 18th April 1885, Annie gave birth to Eddy’s daughter, Alice Margaret, in the Marylebone Workhouse.

When she returned home, her new friend Mary Kelly moved in as the child’s nursemaid.  Mary also worked as a prostitute in the evenings to supplement her meagre income.

Naturally, Eddy absolutely enraged the establishment with his ‘illicit’ marriage which threatened to  spark a constitutional crisis of major proportions.  So, as is always the case, the monarchy set in motion a huge cover-up operation.

Annie was kidnapped from the shop where she worked and at the same time Eddy was confined to Buckingham Palace.

Fortunately, fearing the worst, Annie had given the child, Alice to Walter Sickert for safekeeping shortly before she was forcefully taken to Guy’s Hospital in London.

She remained there for five months and whilst she was there, Sir William Gull, the Queen’s personal physician performed a partial frontal lobotomy on her, in effect rendering her docile and compliant and thus easily controlled by these inhuman monsters.

Certified insane by Gull, Annie lived for the rest of her life in institutions, spending her last days in the Lunacy Observation ward of St George’s Union Workhouse, Chelsea and dying there in obscurity in early 1920 at the age of 57.


There the matter might have ended, but for Mary Kelly’s greed.  Back in Whitechapel, Mary had befriended three other local prostitutes to whom she boasted of her ‘royal connections.’  In the spring of 1888, the quartet hatched a plan to demand money from Walter Sickert, threatening to otherwise make the story public.

She had not fully comprehended the fact that not only was she in effect attempting to blackmail royalty but because of the Freemasonic connection, she was also holding-to-ransom a group of psychopathic murderers who would literally stop at nothing and had the means to kill with impunity whilst enjoying the ‘protection’ of people in high places.

Sickert immediately passed word to Eddy who informed his father.  The Prince of Wales discussed the threat in the greatest secrecy with trusted fellow Masons in the Royal Alpha Lodge. A special meeting was arranged at the Lodge by the Royal Masons known as the ‘Princes of the Blood Royal.’ They agreed to form a ‘hunting party’ to literally hunt-down and kill the hapless girls as punishment for their audacity and as a Masonic blood-sacrifice.

The ‘hunting party’ was drawn exclusively from the Royal Alpha Masonic Lodge and included Sir William Gull, Eddy’s former Cambridge University tutor J. K. Stephen and Sir Charles Warren, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police (who took no active part in the killings but who helped facilitate the plot and expedite the cover-up.)  To drive them about their sordid business, they recruited a coachman who had previously betrayed Prince Eddy’s indiscretions to the Royals, one John Netley.

Warren provided information on the girls’ whereabouts using his privileged position in the police force. Sir William Gull prepared grapes injected with opium, which would be offered to the victims to subdue them so that the dastardly deed could take place with a minimum of fuss.

It was arranged that John Netley, the coach driver and a particularly nasty character was to be the ‘getaway driver.’ The ‘lookout’ would be J.K. Stephen, a cousin of Virginia Woolf and another Freemason with royal links. The murders were planned to occur within Gull’s carriage – away from prying eyes.

It should be noted that Abberline’s diaries confirmed that the modus operandi was that the murders were planned and performed by more than one person according to Masonic ritual, similar to a fox-hunt.  These are facts which were never allowed to come to light.


So, who was the ringleader of this murderous gang?  None other than the prominent Freemason, Secretary of State for India, the Leader of the House of Commons and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Randolph Spencer-Churchill, father of the future prime minister, Winston Churchill.

Churchill was not only the ‘brains’ behind the entire operation, but he was also personally responsible for the cutting of Masonic emblems and symbols into the bodies of the victims, whilst William Gull’s skilled surgeon’s hands of performed the organ removals.

The assassins set about discovering the blackmailers’ whereabouts with ‘insider’ help from Warren and then systematically plotted their executions.  The ritualistic, murderous spree began on the 31st August 1888 with Mary Ann Nicholls as their first victim and continued with the killing of Annie Chapman on the 8th September.

In turn each woman was lured inside the coach, then killed and mutilated in the ritualistic way that the three ‘Juwes’, Jubela, Jubelo and Jubelum, the murderers of Hiram Abiff, were executed in the old Masonic legend.  Their throats were ‘cut across’, their bodies torn open and their entrails ‘thrown over’ the left shoulder.

On the 30th September, there were two further killings but on that night, things did not go smoothly.  As the murderers were dumping that night’s first victim, Lizzie Stride, in Berner Street, they were interrupted and had to abandon her corpse before its ritual mutilation had been completed.

More alarming still, the night’s second victim, Catherine Eddowes, was, according to Sickert, killed in error.  It was learned that poor Catherine had for some time lived with a man called John Kelly, had often used his surname and so had been wrongly identified as the blackmailer-in-chief, Mary Kelly.

That mistake nearly led to the group’s undoing.  In the belief that this was to be the climactic move of their campaign, the group had already arranged Catherine’s corpse, more completely mutilated than any of her predecessors, in Mitre Square opposite the Masonic Temple and close to the Whitechapel Road.

They had chalked on a nearby wall a Masonic slogan to act as a postscript to the whole sordid affair.  A policeman copied it down into his notebook and it said:

“The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.”

Arriving on the scene Sir Charles Warren, to the acute surprise of his underlings, ordered that the chalked epitaph, presumed by observers to be in the killer’s hand, should be immediately washed down and erased.  The reason he gave was that he did not want anti-Jewish sentiment to be inflamed, but Sickert suggested the real reason was that too many insiders would recognize that the message referred not to the ‘Jews’ but to the ‘Juwes’ of Masonic legend, and would therefore identify the killers as Freemasons.

After this setback there was a pause of more than a month, the longest interval between the killings, while the group redoubled their efforts to find the real Mary Kelly. Meanwhile, rumours of the killer’s associations with Freemasonry and with the Royal family continued to grow.  It was not until the 9th November that Mary Kelly was finally tracked down.  To use the coach again was deemed too dangerous now, so she was dispatched in her own Dorset Street lodgings, more bloodily mutilated than any of her fellow-conspirators, her throat slashed, her body brutally cut apart and her intestines arranged ritually about the room.

There is in existence a police drawing of the last person to be seen with Mary whilst she was still alive and this bears an uncanny resemblance to no less a person than Lord Randolph Spencer-Churchill himself.  Of course, this particular ‘lead’ was never followed-up by the Masonic-controlled and run Metropolitan Police.

J.K. Stephen, again according to Abberline’s diaries, actually went to the police, made a full confession and surrendered himself in a fit of guilt but of course no arrests were made and Stephen was also released without charge. Abberline resigned his position with the force and retired forthwith as a direct result of his disgust at the inaction and cover-up on the part of the police.  Indeed there are still files in existence in Scotland Yard that have been sealed forever to prevent the truth from ever being revealed.


When Prince Eddy found out that his wife had been lobotomized, he had a nervous breakdown and was never the same again thereafter.

Sickert fled the country upon hearing the news of Annie Crook’s abduction and took up residence in Dieppe, France in an attempt to protect the child, Alice.  When Alice grew up, she and Walter Sickert became lovers and in turn had a child themselves who went by the name of Joseph Sickert –  who kept Inspector Abberline’s diaries unpublicized for 50 years after inheriting them from his father.

This then is the real story of Jack the Ripper, straight from the ‘horse’s mouth’.  These facts must be known by the current establishment but as always, they close ranks to prevent the truth from becoming known.  All of the multiplicity of theories that abound as to the identity of the killer and the many films, documentaries and TV programmes that portray an unending search for the ‘truth’ are nothing more than elaborate smokescreens, born from the deliberate confusion engendered by the Elite to protect the guilty, as is their usual modus operandi.  This is another tiny example of how easy it is for these psychopaths to provide us all with a completed distorted view of both the past and our existing reality.

A further legacy of this sorry affair was that the payoff for the Spencers was two terms as Prime Minister for Lord Randolph’s son and two generations later, Lady Diana Spencer became the wife of the future King Charles III and mother to the future King William V and his brother Harry, only to be famously discarded once she had produced an ‘heir and a spare.’ In 1997, she was brutally and ritually murdered herself in Paris.

c.2011 John Hamer

Note: The 1991 book, “The Ripper and the Royals” by Melvyn Fairclough covers the diary as well. John Hamer is indebted to the research of Chris Everard, a British alternative film maker who made a film about the depravity of the royals throughout the ages. 


This is an excerpt from his book, ‘The Falsification of History – Our Distorted Reality’ 2012.

John Hamer is a British researcher and author.  Twitter: @johnhamerauthor

Web site:



Related- this ridiculous story in the Daily Mail  that DNA has identified a Polish immigrant “Aaron Kosminski” as the killer.

Obviously the Illuminati go on covering their tracks for decades, even centuries.


Related Topics:

Secret Archive: Jack the Ripper Was a Freemason Committing Ritualistic Murders along with Royals and the Elite*

World Freemasons Gather in Tokyo to Select New Leader as Golden Age Dawns*

Winston Churchill’s Brutal Oppression of the liberty-loving Irish*

Queen’s Speech: Tories Push Ahead with Controversial Plan to Scrap Human Rights Act*

Whistle Blowers Incarcerated, While Queen Elizabeth is Free, but Found Guilty in Missing Children Case*

Why is the Legalization of Gay Marriage so Important to the Queen?*

Paedophilia: Enough Evidence against the Queen of England and Her Prime Minister*

Fears of a British Policed State Rising Midst the Elite Paedophile Scourge*

The Windsor-Bush Bloodline Traced Back to the Roman Caesars and Egyptian Pharaohs*


Trump Authorizes the Pentagon to Manage Troops on the Ground in Iraq and Syria*

Trump Authorizes the Pentagon to Manage Troops on the Ground in Iraq and Syria*

If the West is bankrupt from all the wealth, natural resources, and blood spilt in Africa and Asia, and all the taxes they rob their citizens of are they in any position to rule the world…

U.S. soldiers gather at a military base north of Mosul, Iraq © Mohammed Al-Ramahi / Reuters


U.S. President Trump has given the Pentagon authority to independently set troop levels in Iraq and Syria, and to ensure commanders’ flexibility. Over 5,000 troops are deployed in Iraq, and 500 in Syria, where they operate without Damascus’ invitation.

“The President has delegated the authority for Force Management Levels (FML) for Iraq and Syria to the [Defense] Secretary [James Mattis],” said Captain Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, as cited by ABC.

He also said that no change has been made at this stage to the number of U.S. troops in the Middle East, adding that the current military strategy involves rendering support to local militias fighting Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL).

The move does not mean that the numbers of troops in Iraq and Syria will change “nor does it change the process by which we will manage those forces,” said Davis.

“Bringing the authority really back here where it’s historically been enables military commanders to be more agile, to more quickly and efficiently support partners, to have more rapid decision-making, and to keep units together,” he said, adding, “it simply restores authority and it’s a more effective way of managing it.”

The Force Management Level (FML) system was introduced in Iraq and Syria during the Obama administration, in order to exert control over the military. Control of the system is being transferred from the White House to the Pentagon, where it had typically existed before the Bush and Obama administrations.

Obama, from time to time, increased FML limits, but the scheme was criticized by military commanders, arguing that the bureaucratic process complicated their ability to deploy troops in the midst of the wars in Iraq, and later, Syria.

The decision to allow the Pentagon to manage troop levels comes as U.S. public approval for expanded engagement in Syria shows signs of strength. A Morning Consult/Politico poll published in mid-April found that 31% of Americans believe the U.S. should be doing “much more” in Syria, while another 32% said the U.S. should be doing “somewhat more.”

The poll also found that 66% supported the Trump administration’s decision to launch a massive cruise missile strike on a Syrian Army airbase in Shayrat – a move that was described as an act of aggression by Damascus and Moscow.

The delegation of authority over FML does not apply to Afghanistan, where 8,400 American soldiers are still deployed. The Trump administration is currently reviewing its Afghanistan strategy, and the authority for setting troop levels there will still be handled by the White House.

“When the White House has oversight, [the figure] has a political dimension, good or bad. Trump was elected so there is a degree in which he is abdicating. That’s a pretty big decision to delegate to your Secretary of Defense,” Colin Kahl, national security adviser to former Vice President Joe Biden, told BuzzFeed.

“This allows the Pentagon to race ahead of the inter-agency process, which is designed to produce holistic strategies to address our most pressing challenges.”


Related Topics:

U.S. Deploying Thousands More Ground Troops to Kuwait to Fight in Iraq and Syria*

Desperate Cabal Use UFO to Attack Caught Over Syria, Countless Structures Destroyed*

Deep State in Panic Mode, Creating Events to Distract from their Activities*

Major U.S. Politicians Are Being Blackmailed by the Deep State

The Satanists who destroyed the Middle East are back in Washington*

The Satanists who destroyed the Middle East are back in Washington*

By Jonas E. Alexis

Wolfowitz was elated when he heard that Trump attacked Syria, and he has had private email conversation with “Trump Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and national security advisor H.R. McMaster, both long time contacts since his Bush days.” He hopes that the Trump adiministration “will pursue a U.S. strategy of stepped-up engagement in the Middle East.”


Paul Wolfowitz

The Satanists who literally created chaos in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya are back in the White House. They are currently chilling with the Trump administration. One of those Satanists is none other than Paul Wolfowitz. A little background of this dude.

When he was told by deputy national security advisor Stephen Hadley that there was no link between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, Wolfowitz responded with certainty,

“We’ll find it. It’s got to be there,” which is another way of saying that if it does not exist, they would make it up.

Both Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith were under investigation for passing classified documents to Israel. In other words, these people were and obviously still are agents of the Israeli regime. It must be stated in passing that the FBI has numerous documents tracing Israel’s espionage in the U.S., but no one has come forward and declared it explicitly in the media because most value their careers and lives.

For example, when two top AIPAC officials—Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman—were caught passing classified documents from the Pentagon to Israel, Gabriel Schoenfeld defended them. In the annual FBI report called “Foreign Economic Collection and Industrial Espionage,” Israel is a major country that pops up quite often.

This is widely known among CIA and FBI agents and U.S. officials for years. One former U.S. intelligence official declared,

“There is a huge, aggressive, ongoing set of Israeli activities directed against the United States. Anybody who worked in counterintelligence in a professional capacity will tell you the Israelis are among the most aggressive and active countries targeting the United States. They undertake a wide range of technical operations and human operations. People here as liaisons… aggressively pursue classified intelligence from people. The denials are laughable.

In 1991, the Israelis tried to recruit a former U.S. intelligence official, but he declined.

“I had an Israeli intelligence officer pitch me in Washington at the time of the first Gulf War. I said, ‘No, go away,’ and reported it to counterintelligence.”

Covert operations were done by the Israelis in “a 1997 case in which the National Security Agency bugged two Israeli intelligence officials in Washington discussing efforts to obtain a sensitive U.S. diplomatic document. Israel denied wrongdoing in that case and all others, and no one has been prosecuted.”

Yet this has rarely seen the light of day in the popular media. Pointing these facts out, according to the reasoning of Omri Ceren of Commentary, is tantamount to anti-Semitism. And since criticism of Israel and Jewish behavior is anti-Semitism, then Satanists like Paul Wolfowitz can walk on the political platform as they so choose because no one can touch them.

Wolfowitz has obviously seen that Iraq is not paradise, but he still wants to bludgeon America in the region—presumably for Israel.

 “The alternative is to let a very important, critical part of the world go to hell literally and lose American influence,” he declares.

“We may not like to talk about oil, but this is the engine of the world economy and if it’s dominated by the wrong people, the consequences here in the United States are very serious.”

Wolfowitz was elated when he heard that Trump attacked Syria, and he has had private email conversation with “Trump Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and national security advisor H.R. McMaster, both longtime contacts since his Bush days.” He hopes that the Trump administration “will pursue a U.S. strategy of stepped-up engagement in the Middle East.”

Wolfowitz actually sees the Trump administration as a puppet which needs to be manipulated. “I think there is a fantastic opportunity here,” he diabolically declared.

“It’s only a first step, it’s only an opportunity.”

Opportunity to do what? To con the American people again? To send a six-trillion dollar bill to decent Americans who cannot even afford to feed their families? To loot pension funds for perpetual wars?

Keep in mind that Wolfowitz completely disavowed Trump during his election precisely because Trump kept talking about “America First,” an idea which is antithetical to perpetual wars in the Middle East. Now Satanists like Wolfowitz are all over the Trump administration because Trump has already prostrated before them.


Related Topics:

How America Betrayed its Sunni Allies in Middle East?

Suicide Kills U.S. Troops More than Active Duty in the Middle East*

U.S. Opposed to Sovereignty of Muslim Nations*

Greater Israel” Requires the Breaking up of Existing Arab States*

The Secret Oil War Has Begun*

Queen Elizabeth Warns Of ‘Holy War To End All Wars’ *

How the World Map Looks Wildly Different from What You Think*

How the World Map Looks Wildly Different from What You Think*

From Alexandra Bruce

Most of us have an idea of what the world map looks like, based on its most popular representation, the Mercator Projection. This is an extremely flawed 2D representation
of the Earth’s landmasses, due to the spherical shape of the planet.

This clip shows how completely skewed the actual sizes are the world’s countries, according the Mercator Projection.

I have been being trolled by Flat Earthers in the Comments sections lately and I invite all reasonable people to correct perpetrators and/or victims of the nefarious newfangled Flat Earth psyop/trope at will.

Related Topics:

Nine Ancient Maps that SHOULD NOT exist in Western Eyes*

Ancient Pyramids in Antartica’s Landscape and the Piri Reis Map*

The TRUE Size Of Africa*

ICA Finally Admits World Map is a Propaganda Tool for Power, Western Cartographers Deliberately Shrunk Africa*