Tag Archive | eugenics

Toddler Permanently Brain Damaged by a Mystery Combination Vaccination That Her Parent’s Did Not Consent To*

Toddler Permanently Brain Damaged by a Mystery Combination Vaccination That Her Parent’s Did Not Consent To*

Jodie Marchant (centre) with her parents. Jodie became permanently brain-damaged after receiving mystery vaccine-combination without informed consent.

By Christina England

On May 17, 1993, Mr. and Mrs. Marchant took their daughter, Jodie, to the doctor for her 14-month check-up. Jodie was fit and healthy and meeting all her milestones, so her parents agreed for her to be vaccinated with the MMR vaccination, a decision that will haunt them forever. Mr. Marchant explained to us what happened the moment that Jodie received her vaccination:

“Jodie let out a high-pitched scream and appeared to be in a state of shock. Her eyes became vacant as if in a trance and she appeared to lose interest in eating and refused all food and we had to resort to giving her milkshakes. Jodie did not recognize anyone for a long time. Note, in 1997, her then-GP was able to confirm that Jodie was okay prior to vaccination and this confirms the records were available when the GP INSPECTED THEM.

Jodie stopped movement and would sit on the sofa rocking with eyes rolling and stopped talking.”

It appears that instead of receiving the MMR vaccine, as agreed, Jodie received a mystery vaccination, because according to her medical records, she received a combination of the following vaccinations: diphtheria/tetanus (DT), polio, pertussis, and the MMR 11.

I say this because it states very clearly on her vaccination card that these were the vaccinations that were given on the day that Jodie was vaccinated.  However, despite the fact that all of these vaccinations were recorded, her parents have stated that Jodie only received one shot at the time she was vaccinated.

There was also a mention of the Hib vaccination being given, a vaccine against Haemophilus influenza type B.

Furthermore, her parents have stated, that when they entered the doctor’s surgery, they were shocked to discover that the vaccination had been prepared by their doctor in advance.

CHILD HEALTH RECORD — VACC. a IMM. RESULTS

 

Doctors Found Guilty of Mixing Several Vaccines Together in One Syringe

If what her parents are saying is true and Jodie did only receive one shot on the day she was vaccinated, then we need to consider whether or not Jodie’s doctor decided to mix several vaccinations into one syringe without her parents’ knowledge or consent.

1-year-old Jodie Marchant

.

Whilst the majority of us would consider this to be not only unethical but also highly unlikely, remarkably, it is a possibility because, in 2013, the Globe and Mail reported that a paediatrician from Halifax was found guilty of doing the unthinkable.

They reported that:

Dr. William Vitale had a habit of mixing vaccines into a single syringe rather than administering them separately, and as many as 500 children will have to be re-vaccinated.

For example, at a year old, babies receive a four-in-one vaccine – measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella – along with two other vaccines to protect against meningococcal disease and pneumococcal disease. Dr. Vitale told investigators at the Nova Scotia College of Physicians and Surgeons that he mixed the three shots in one syringe to reduce the number of needles children would get.”

What is even more shocking is that this doctor is not alone in his actions. In 2016, the Guardian reported on an equally disturbing story:

“Regulators have suspended the license of a doctor in Chicago who allegedly gave patients modified vaccinations containing cat saliva and vodka.”

They stated:

“After hearing complaints from health care providers that children were getting unapproved oral versions of childhood shots from Dr. Ming Te Lin, investigators visited Lin’s practice.

They found a cluttered, unsterile office and ‘a box filled with vials and tubes that [Lin] was using to make his own vaccinations.’”

They continued:

“Lin told investigators he had been preparing alternative vaccinations for children for more than a decade, according to the order.

Despite his unapproved methods, Lin is accused of signing state forms certifying he had given paediatric patients their conventional shots. Charts showed the patients who received unapproved oral vaccines included a seven-day-old infant.”

In fact, reports such as these are not as rare as we might imagine. During a now-censored YouTube video, the developer of Merck’s vaccine program, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, was filmed openly admitting that whilst working for Merck, the polio vaccines had been deliberately contaminated with SV40, a cancer-causing monkey virus from 1953-1963.

Although the original clip was censored, other copies are still in existence.

See: Dr. Maurice Hilleman, developer of Merck’s vaccine program, explains why Merck’s vaccines have spread AIDS & other plagues worldwide

Do We Actually Know What Our Doctors Are Vaccinating Us With?

In 2015, VacTruth reported on the story of Alisa Neathery, a mother who took her six-month-old unvaccinated baby, Bently, to the doctor to be examined for the first time. However, instead of treating Alisa with respect, the medical personnel emotionally blackmailed her into having her baby vaccinated with a lethal combination of 13 vaccines.

Alisa explained that:

“Prior to the shots being given, when the doctor was discussing the pros of getting vaccinated with me, he explained how he was from a village in Africa. That we were lucky in America to have the opportunity to receive vaccines because where he was from, the mothers had to have like 11 kids each since most would die off from disease because they were not as fortunate to receive vaccines like we are here in America. He really pushed them on me hard. He spent a lot of time convincing me to give Bently the vaccines, but when it was done, we never saw the doctor again.”

The report stated that:

Bently’s doctor decided to vaccinate this previously unvaccinated baby with a total of 13 vaccinations in one day, in what can only be described as a bid to catch up.

The vaccinations included:

  • Two doses of the DTaP – diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine
  • Hib – Haemophilus influenza type B vaccine
  • IPV- inactivated polio vaccine
  • Pneumococcal vaccine
  • Three doses of oral rotavirus vaccine

VacTruth reported that:

“Bently was also given three other vaccinations, which appear to be unidentified on his vaccination card, plus the hepatitis B vaccine and oral polio vaccine.

Little Bently died in his mother’s arms just five days later.”

For further information on this story, read: Six-Month-Old Baby Dies Just Five Days After Receiving 13 Vaccines.

Jodie’s Parents Had Only Consented to the MMR Vaccine

Jodie is now 25 years of age; she has no language, is doubly incontinent, still drinks from a bottle and suffers from a variety of disabilities similar to autism. Her parents have received no apologies, no compensation and no help for their disabled daughter. They believe that their case hinges on the following facts:

  1. They did not give their consent for her to receive any vaccine other than the MMR.
  2. They did not have sufficient information on this vaccination to make an informed choice on whether or not they wanted their daughter vaccinated with anything other than the MMR, which, according to the Montgomery Ruling, they must receive in full.
  3. By vaccinating Jodie with multiple vaccinations without her parents’ consent or knowledge, her doctor committed an offense which was a breach of both Jodie’s and her parents’ human rights.

I have met this family and have received their paperwork and I found the reports to be full of inconsistencies.

For example, a report referenced as JGB01/JGB01/213223, dated May 6, 2016, stated:

As you can see, each one of these statements states something entirely different and these inconsistencies continued throughout the paperwork.

 

Although the report did ascertain that Jodie suffered from autism, the report then stated she was not eligible for compensation from the Vaccine Damage Payment Unit, because after reading the medical evidence, it was not accepted that Jodie had been damaged by the vaccination. However, Mr. Marchant believes that this is not the case and his views were reiterated by Dr. Warner. from Southampton, who stated:

Letter from Professor J Warner, Southampton

 

Jodie is one of the most disabled adults I have met and this family has been left penniless and alone to cope. This case is even more tragic when you see the photos and reports of Jodie before she was vaccinated. Jodie was a healthy normal little girl who before vaccination was meeting all of her milestones.

In fact, her general practitioner, Dr. Jennifer Greenland, stated this in a letter addressed to Dr. Andrew Wakefield and his team. The letter stated:

“Her diagnosis of autism was confirmed in May 1996 after a full assessment.”

Her words were repeated by Dr. Walker-Smith’s return letter, which stated:

“…then she stopped eating, started screaming and lost what words she had.”

Several Reports Stated that Jodie is Vaccine-Injured

In a draft report, titled Appendix A, Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM, wrote the following statement:

Throughout his report, he makes it clear that, in his professional medical opinion, Jodie’s injuries were caused by the vaccinations that she had received.

Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM wrote: “Jodie’s serious handicaps are causally related to vaccination.”

He continued his report by stating that in 2002, he was appointed as the Expert Medical Witness, by a firm of solicitors in an MMR litigation, and explained that the case involved approximately 1,200 vaccine-damaged children. However, the case was terminated by the Legal Services Commission (LSC) on the grounds that legal success for the claimants was unlikely.

Since then, he has witnessed literally hundreds of more cases and has been able to establish a clear clinical picture of seriously handicapped children. He explained that the list of injuries that he had witnessed was endless and he presented the list in full:

Provided by Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM.

As you can see, this list is extremely extensive. Furthermore, Dr. Fletcher continued his report by stating that:

Statement by Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM.

With this information in mind, it is difficult to understand why Jodie’s case was dismissed. Especially when you consider the fact that Jodie suffers nearly every one of the conditions that were listed.

Statement by Dr. Peter Fletcher, MB BS MSc Ph.D. FFPM.

In his summary, Dr. Fletcher stated:

“Evidence fully supports Jodie’s normal medical history prior to this administration of vaccines.”

What makes the whole situation even worse is the fact that Dr. Fletcher was not the only professional to submit a report stating that Jodie was vaccine-damaged. However, despite the overwhelming evidence presented to the Vaccine Damage Payment Unit (VDPU) and the fact that no consent was given for Jodie to receive multiple vaccinations, this family has been left alone to struggle.

Maybe the reason for this can be found in a letter written by the senior case manager for the Legal Services Commission, Mr. John Baker.

Mr. Baker wrote:

Written by Mr. Baker.

(Note: MPA is the abbreviation for Multi-People Action.)

To which, Mr. Miller replied with the following statement, in an email to Mr. Baker:

Written by Mr. Miller.

This is probably the single most damning statement written by any of these professionals because he went on to state the following information in a letter to Mr. Baker:

“Upon first considering our comprehensive letter of instruction, Dr. Geier confirmed that it may prove impossible to consider the combined effects of the alleged mixture of vaccines. There would be no documented study of how such a combination would react within a human body as it has never been accepted that it is appropriate to mix such vaccines together, such vaccines are already mixed by their manufacturers in a manner which is considered to be appropriate and safe for provision at the time. It is, therefore, clear that the original instruction of Dr. Geier has been unfulfilled as it seemed impossible to obtain appropriate evidence as to how such vaccines would have reacted together and reacted upon Jodie Marchant’s body.”

This was followed by another letter which stated:

Written by Mr. Miller.

Mr. Miller is absolutely spot-on with his account of this case because no consent was ever given for Jodie to receive a single syringe containing a mixture of several vaccines. Mr. Marchant stated:

“The lack of consent should have been the obvious route to take. If it had been taken by our Legal Reps our case would have finished years ago. To ignore our consent refusal is criminal and an indication of the limits doctors will go to obtain their bonuses.”

It is for these reasons that Mr. Marchant has decided to represent his daughter himself, with or without legal representation. He has told Health Impact News that he believes that it is about time that the doctor who vaccinated his daughter is held accountable for her actions.

Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm

eBook – Available for immediate download

 

Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who stood up against big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the Earth.

Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.

Because of the strong opposition from big pharma concerning Dr. Moulden’s research, we became concerned that the name of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from the internet. His reputation was being disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone. This book summarizes his teaching and is a must-read for everyone who wants to learn the “other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors.

Source*

Related Topics:

WHO Admitted Smallpox Vaccine Caused AIDS after Requesting It*

13 Year-Old Boy Permanently Disabled from Chicken Pox Vaccine Wins his Case in Vaccine Court*

Why You Should NEVER Sign ‘Refusal to Vaccinate’ Document*

Vaccine Induced Chronic Fatigue Syndrome*

Triplets Regress into Autism Following Flu Vaccine*

Polio Vaccine Refusal Cases among Well-educated People Baffle Officials in Pakistan*

Norwegian Study Links Flu Vaccine to Narcolepsy Risk*

Varicella Occurring From Chickenpox Vaccination*

H.R. 1313 Bill Would Require Medical Procedures Like Vaccines as Requirement for Employment*

DTP Vaccine Associated With 212% Increased Infant Mortality Risk*

Lab Report Analysis Found Round Up in MMR Vaccine*

Australian Prime Minister and Wife Tied to Pharma, Pushing Mandatory Vaccination*

Scrubbed from Textbooks — The U.S. Government’s National Experiment in Extermination*

Scrubbed from Textbooks — The U.S. Government’s National Experiment in Extermination*

By Claire Bernish 

In desperation to make effective the floundering Prohibition on alcohol, the U.S. government — unable to convince the public consumption of booze constituted a moral transgression — intentionally poisoned the supply in a last-ditch attempt to enforce State-mandated sobriety.

This “chemist’s war of Prohibition” became, as outspoken opponent and New York City chief medical examiner in the 1920s, Charles Norris, hauntingly described, “our national experiment in extermination.”

Rather than keep people away from bathtub gin and the constant flow of liquor in hidden speakeasies — the State-sanctioned toxic experiment killed thousands of people who simply wanted to imbibe.

Alcohol poisoning in the time of Prohibition had become commonplace — anyone with a grasp on forced taboos will tell you government control of vice furiously fuels black markets — as home distillers, including those keen to profit unethically, concocted batches of booze made with questionable ingredients.

Hospitals accustomed to treating illnesses caused by bad batches of homemade alcohol — bootleg supplies not infrequently were tainted with metals and other contaminants — were not prepared for a spate of deaths in New York City over the Christmas holidays in 1926. This wasn’t, they realized, a typical case of toxic back-alley booze — in a mere two days, 23 people lost their lives.

People began dropping like flies, in fact, and a list of similar incidents quickly lengthened.

Thirty-three people perished in just three days in Manhattan in 1928 from tainted hooch believed to be wood alcohol — and by that time, the public felt federal intervention might be necessary. However, as TIME reported shortly afterward,

“Everyone expected the intervention and assistance of Federal forces, lately so loudly active in Manhattan. But no one expected what actually happened. The Federals announced that the government could do absolutely nothing. The statement of the Federal Grand Jury read as follows: ‘Inasmuch as wood alcohol is not a beverage, but a recognized poison (analogous to prussic acid or iodine) and its use and sale are not regulated by any of the Federal laws, we respectfully report that in those particular instances the subject matter is for the consideration of the State authorities rather than the Federal authorities. The State laws regulate the sale of poisons and provide for punishment for their improper use and sale.’”

By the time of the repeal of Prohibition in the December 5, 1933, ratification of the Twenty-first Amendment, estimates surmise no less than 10,000 had perished as a direct result of the government’s horrendously ill-fated poisoning program. As Slate’s Deborah Blum reported,

“Frustrated that people continued to consume so much alcohol even after it was banned, federal officials had decided to try a different kind of enforcement. They ordered the poisoning of industrial alcohols manufactured in the United States, products regularly stolen by bootleggers and resold as drinkable spirits. The idea was to scare people into giving up illicit drinking. Instead, by the time Prohibition ended in 1933, the federal poisoning program, by some estimates, had killed at least 10,000 people.”

In order to poison the supply, the government had to turn to the base ingredient commonly used by bootleg manufacturers, as TIME Magazine explained,

“For years, that industrial alcohol had been ‘denatured’ by adding toxic or unappetizing chemicals to it — the idea was originally so that people couldn’t escape beverage taxes by drinking commercial-use alcohol instead — but it was still possible to re-purify the liquid so that it could be consumed.

“So, as TIME reported in the Jan. 10, 1927, issue, a solution emerged from the anti-drinking forces in the government: that year, a new formula for denaturing industrial-grade alcohol was introduced, doubling how poisonous the product became. The new formula included ‘4 parts methanol (wood alcohol), 2.25 parts pyridine bases, 0.5 parts benzene to 100 parts ethyl alcohol’ and, as TIME noted, ‘Three ordinary drinks of this may cause blindness.’ (In case you didn’t guess, ‘blind drink’ isn’t just a figure of speech.)”

Prohibition had widespread support, and although not everyone agreed with the government’s new method of coercion meant to quash the nation’s obvious love affair with alcohol — TIME noted New Jersey Senator Edward I. Edwards called it “legalized murder” — those who did pontificated on the supposed amorality of drinking as justification for poisoning deaths.

“The Government is under no obligation to furnish the people with alcohol that is drinkable when the Constitution prohibits it,” asserted poisoning and Prohibition advocate, Wayne B. Wheeler. “The person who drinks this industrial alcohol is a deliberate suicide … To root out a bad habit costs many lives and long years of effort. …”

The Chicago Tribune strikingly editorialized in 1927, as cited by Slate,

“Normally, no American government would engage in such business. … It is only in the curious fanaticism of Prohibition that any means, however barbarous, are considered justified.”

Myriad ruinous government programs, in particular prohibitions on alcohol and cannabis, have been implemented under the premise of protecting the people from some misbegotten ill — but, in practice, these efforts too often play out more disastrously than if the State had never intervened in the first place.

Ratification of the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution in 1919 meant a ban on the sale, manufacture, and transport of alcoholic beverages — and the subsequent passage of the Volstead Act provided the rules for enforcement of Prohibition when it went into effect in 1920.

Anti-alcohol organizations constantly sermonized on the evils of drinking, and though the notion seems almost quaint in 2017, the post-war atmosphere in the U.S. welcomed any movement to prevent further degradation of morals — or, more accurately, the morals of a specific group of people whose grandstanding centered around alcohol.

Unsurprisingly, vocal support for the platform overrepresented the reality — the business of banned booze immediately and decisively boomed. Blum wrote,

“Alcoholism rates soared during the 1920s; insurance companies charted the increase at more than 300 more percent. Speakeasies promptly opened for business. By the decade’s end, some 30,000 existed in New York City alone. Street gangs grew into bootlegging empires built on smuggling, stealing, and manufacturing illegal alcohol. The country’s defiant response to the new laws shocked those who sincerely (and naively) believed that the amendment would usher in a new era of upright behavior.”

None of that shock nor the high-and-mighty stance from which the temperance movement preached moral uprightness ever targeted the government for recklessly condemning random alcohol drinkers to death.

When the State takes the reins of any flippantly righteous high horse, it’s a veritable guarantee the program is doomed to failure — and Prohibition was no exception.

Indiscriminately killing more than 10,000 people by deliberate poisoning, however, belies the less candid goal the government would never admit: control at any cost.

Source*

Related Topics:

Bayer and U.S. Govt. Knowingly Gave HIV to Thousands of Children*

CIA Mind Control: The Philadelphia Experiment on Americans

Rockefeller Music Project in the War on Consciousness*

Rockerfeller’s Flu Pandemic*

Hitler Never Gassed His Own People, but the U.S. Did*

Navy Secretly Conducting Electromagnetic Warfare Training on U.S. Public*

How the CIA Used LSD to Destroy the New Left*

 

New Studies Confirm Syrian Building Struck by U.S. Drones was a Mosque*

New Studies Confirm Syrian Building Struck by U.S. Drones was a Mosque*

Forensic Architecture recreated the northern section of the mosque and imposed it over the building’s rubble.

 

By Samuel Oakford

A lethal U.S. drone strike in Syria on March 16th did target a mosque – as locals have always insisted and American officials have denied – according to new analysis by Forensic Architecture, Human Rights Watch and Bellingcat. Researchers also allege that the U.S. launched Hellfire missiles at civilians as they fled the mosque, killing many.

The new reports make use of before and after imagery of the buildings; eyewitness testimonies; and architects’ drawings to demonstrate that the United States did indeed target the Sayidina Omar Ibn Al-Khattab mosque, located about a mile southwest of al-Jinah in Aleppo governorate.

“Our analysis reveals that contrary to U.S. statements, the building targeted was a functioning, recently-built mosque containing a large prayer hall, several auxiliary functions and the Imam’s residence,” according to Forensic Architecture.

In its own report Human Rights Watch argues “that U.S. authorities failed to take all feasible precautions to avoid or minimize civilian casualties in the attack, a requirement under the laws of war.”

Forensic Architecture’s video showing bombed al Jinah building was a functioning mosque

In a detailed video report released April 18th, Forensic Architecture – based at Goldsmiths College at the University of London – presents evidence, including videos and pictures taken before and after the strike, accompanied by 3D modelling that identifies and illustrates various sections of the mosque. The northern portion, which was destroyed, included “a dining area, the toilets, a ritual washing area and the secondary, smaller prayer room.” Witnesses said that several hundred people were in the building, including around 50 in the smaller prayer room, which is also known as the “winter prayer hall.”

According to local residents who spoke with Human Rights Watch, the attack began “just before or around” 7PM. The attack took place slightly over an hour after what would have been Maghrib (sunset) prayer and roughly 15 minutes before Isha’a (night) prayer. One witness said that many people would stay in the complex, moving from the prayer hall to kitchen area “to eat and rest before the night prayer.” Four witnesses that researchers at Human Rights Watch spoke with estimated there were 300 people attending a religious lecture at the mosque when the attack began.

After two 500lb bombs destroyed the northern segments of the building, worshipers and those inside the main prayer hall in the southern part fled. At this point, many of those fleeing were fired on by what researchers working with Forensic Architecture, as well as Human Rights Watch later identified as likely Hellfire missiles. This account – of larger bombs and at least several Hellfire missiles being fired – is in line with the total number of munitions earlier reported by the Washington Post.

“Exchanging architectural plans and photographic analysis with people on the ground we managed to reconstruct a detailed model of the mosque,” said Omar Ferwati, project coordinator for Forensic Architecture.

“We believe that the U.S. forces that targeted the building misidentified the nature of the building, leading to high levels of civilian casualties.”

Working with Mohammad Halak, head of the local White Helmets rescue team, researchers determined that eight people were killed and 11 injured “as a result of the first two blasts within the northern part of the building.” Among the casualties were the Imam’s wife Ghousoun Makansi who died when the couple’s upstairs apartment was also destroyed in the attack; as well as two brothers – Mohammad Khaled Orabi and Hassan Ombar Orabi, aged 14 and ten. According to Forensic Architecture, the rest of the casualties were due to missile strikes which then hit the area outside the mosque. On a road, researchers were able to match marks – geo-located by Bellingcat – with those traditionally left by Hellfire missiles.

Such ‘double tap’ strikes gained infamy during the most controversial periods of the CIA’s drone campaign in Pakistan.

U.S. denials

Airwars was the first to report confirmation of U.S. involvement in the al Jinah strike, which was perpetrated with the use of drones on the evening of March 16th. Monitoring by Airwars presently puts the death toll at at least 37. The White Helmets, who estimated that over 50 perished, provided the names of more than two dozen of the dead included five children.

Al-Jinah is just across the border from Idlib, the Syrian governorate where the U.S. has carried out an increasingly intense unilateral campaign against alleged al Qaeda-linked targets. Initially, U.S. officials told Airwars the strike had taken place in Idlib. Operations like the one that targeted al-Jinah are officially separate from the anti-ISIS campaign elsewhere in the country.

Forensic Architecture and collaborating researchers identified two large craters in the northern section of the building

 

Shortly after the strike, the Pentagon released a picture of where the drones had hit, showing the left (northern

 

) side of a building crumpled from impact, while the remainder of the structure appears still standing. Across from destroyed sections is a smaller structure, which looks to be untouched.

U.S. officials still insist that the target, successfully hit that night, was ‘an Al Qaeda in Syria meeting location,” and that the smaller building across the street had been identified by the Americans as a mosque, and therefore avoided.

“Intelligence indicated that al Qaida leaders used the partially-constructed community meeting hall as a gathering place, and as a place to educate and indoctrinate al Qaida fighters,” Pentagon spokesperson Eric Pahon told Airwars after the attack.

Yet Forensic Architecture concludes that this identification was incorrect, along with initial claims that the strike had taken place across the border in Idlib, and that no civilians were killed. Researchers at Bellingcat determined that the civilian casualties due to the strike “are partially the result of the building’s misidentification.” Central to the disparity in accounts was an apparent American determination that because they had identified one mosque, the building across the street – which was in fact a larger, newer mosque – couldn’t be one as well.

Witnesses, including the director of Aleppo’s Civil Defense, told Human Rights Watch that victims were not wearing military clothing. In its report, Human Rights Watch said it

“has not found evidence to support the allegation that members of al-Qaeda or any other armed group were meeting in the mosque.”

“The U.S. authorities’ failure to understand the most fundamental aspects of the target and pattern of life around the target raises the question whether officers were criminally reckless in authorizing the attack,” concluded HRW researchers.

The Bellingcat study includes details of the Tablighi Jamaat, “a non-political global Sunni Islamic missionary movement which focuses on urging return to primary Sunni Islam.” The group – which says one of its classes was struck – has at least 12 million supporters globally according to Bellingcat. The open-source collective also includes a detailed timeline of the Al Jinah event.

The Pentagon issued this photograph to demonstrate, it claimed, that it had not bombed a mosque in Syria. Forensic Architecture now says the opposite is true

 

Source*

Related Topics:

Trump is Filling Top Pentagon and Homeland Security Positions With Defense Contractors*

Over 100 Civilians Dead after Recent U.S. Raids on Alleged al-Qaeda Training Camps*

Chinese Billionaire Says U.S. Wasted Trillions on Wars and Wall Street and Forgot about their Citizens*

U.S. Has Spent $11.5 Million A Day for Past 542 Days Straight in Fight against ISIS*

How Many Muslim Countries Has the U.S. Bombed Or Occupied Since 1980?*

U.S.-led Coalition Aircrafts Kill 15 Civilians in Raqqa, Syria*

U.S. Admits Using Radioactive Weapons in Syria that Left Thousands of Iraqi Babies Deformed*

U.S.-U.K. Paid “White Helmets” Help to Block Water to 5 Million Thirsty Syrians*

Chicago Protest: #HandsOffSyria!

U.S.-U.K. Paid “White Helmets” Help to Block Water to 5 Million Thirsty Syrians*

Under Trump U.S. Drone Strikes Have Gone Up 432%*

ISIS, Al-Qaeda and the U.S. Waging War on Syria’s Public Utilities*

The International Criminal Court is investigating U.S. War Crimes, with a Huge Catch*

U.S. Military is Building a $100mn Drone Base in Africa*

Bulldozing Islamic Heritage

 

Ontario give Doctors no Choice but to Refer Patients for Assisted Death*

Ontario give Doctors no Choice but to Refer Patients for Assisted Death*

MPP Jeff Yurek proposes a conscience rights amendment for Ontario physicians

 

By Lianne Laurence

A Liberal-dominated committee has refused to add conscience rights protection to Ontario’s bill regulating euthanasia and assisted suicide.

The finance and economic affairs committee voted down Progressive Conservative health critic Jeff Yurek’s proposed conscience rights amendments to Bill 84 on Tuesday.

The Liberal move leaves conscientiously objecting doctors with no protection against a College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario’s policy forcing them to give patients requesting euthanasia an “effective referral” — that is, to a willing and accessible colleague for the purposes of accomplishing the act.

The CPSO policy also forces doctors to effectively refer patients who request “medical services” as abortion or abortifacient contraception.

Doctors who refuse can be disciplined by CPSO and could lose their license to practise.

“We were very disappointed,” says Larry Worthen, spokesperson for the Coalition for HealthCare and Conscience.

“We met with various politicians that were involved and we described for them the ways that people could access medical assistance in dying without affecting conscience rights and yet they still voted to not include the conscience amendment,” he told LifeSiteNews.

The Coalition for Conscience had also launched a massive lobbying campaign for conscience rights in Bill 84, and 25,000 people sent letters to MPPs, Worthen said.

Moreover, 31 of the 42 oral presentations to the committee also asked for a conscience right amendment to the bill, he said. That doesn’t include the written submissions to the committee.

The Liberal refusal to protect conscience rights will cost them, says Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.

“This is a crucial item,” he told LifeSiteNews.

“Liberal backbenchers are going to find it awfully hard to get elected in the next election if they don’t start supporting conscience rights and issues that matter to doctors and people in Ontario.”

Liberal intransigence on this point is a bit surprising to Monte McNaughton, the first MPP to speak up for conscience rights at Queen’s Park.

“Ontario’s still the only jurisdiction in the world that is moving forward with effective referral protocol,” the MPP for Lambton-Kent-Middlesex told LifeSiteNews.

“You would think the government would look to other jurisdictions on how they protected conscience rights.”

Moreover, conscience rights protection has widespread support, he pointed out.

“I’ve raised this a number of times in the House, introduced petitions signed by thousands of concerned people right across Ontario,” McNaughton said, adding that there are

“a number of organizations and individual doctors who have been raising this for months now.”

That includes the Ontario Medical Association, which sent representatives to meet with McNaughton and other MPPs, and is “on the record wanting the government to move away from effective referral protocol and to ensure that conscience rights are protected.”

The OMA appeared before the the committee urging it adopt conscience rights protection, as did the Catholic Civil Rights League, the Assembly of Catholic Bishops of Ontario, and Cardinal Thomas Collins, who spoke on behalf of the Coalition for HealthCARE and Conscience.

The Concerned Ontario Doctors, which represents 20,000 physicians, also came out backing conscience rights at an April 11 press conference.

But the “Wynne government is determined to move forward with this globally unprecedented effective referral protocol,” McNaughton said.

In doing so, the Liberals are

stripping a basic freedom from these doctors and health care practitioners, that is freedom of conscience.”

Worthen said the committee passed an amendment to set up a care coordination service, which is patient-accessed and connects a patient seeking euthanasia with a doctor who is willing to kill him or her.

However, “until the requirement for effective referral is struck down that doesn’t really help us in terms of protecting conscience,” he said.

The Coalition is now focused on the legal challenge to the CPSO policy that will be heard in Ontario’s divisional court June 13 to 15 in Toronto.

Five Christian doctors and three groups are arguing that the CPSO policy violates a physician’s Charter protected rights of religion and conscience.

The doctors are co-plaintiffs with the Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada, Canadian Physicians for Life, and the Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians’ Societies

The Liberal government is intervening on behalf of the CPSO.

Meanwhile, MPP Yurek (Elgin-Middlesex-London) will table a private member’s bill on conscience rights on May 11.

Yurek’s amendments to Bill 84 would have protected doctors from civil liability and discipline by the CPSO.

Those amendments clarified that doctors with conscientious objections would not block patients’ access to euthanasia.

The amendments clarified that objecting doctors would provide, on request, information “about services that can provide access” to euthanasia; patient medical records, and would communicate “to the appropriate person in authority a patient’s request for a complete transfer of care so that the person in authority can facilitate the transfer.”

Worthen told the Catholic Register that the Coalition for Conscience backed Yurek’s amendments, which provided access to euthanasia “without negatively affecting conscience rights.”

“It’s important that people realize that we’re not trying to block patients from accessing this,” he told the Register. “What we’re trying to do is not be morally implicated in their decision.”

Source*

Related Topics:

Sex Abuse Victim Allowed Euthanasia as mental health problems Considered ‘INCURABLE’*

When Euthanasia Crosses the Line into Murder*

Canada’s Surgeons Harvesting Organs from Euthanised Patients*

VIDEO: Bioethics, Eugenics and the “after-birth abortion” of newborns

 

A Father Describes Saving His Daughter from U.S. Bombardment of Mosul*

A Father Describes Saving His Daughter from U.S. Bombardment of Mosul*

Awra Ali, 4, sits in her hospital bed at West Erbil Emergency in Erbil, Iraq on March 30, 2017. Photo: Cengiz Yar for The Intercept

 

 

By Anna Lekas Miller

On March 17, Ala’a Ali left his wife and 4-year-old daughter at the home of relatives in the al Jadida neighbourhood of Mosul, and went home to wash before the morning call to prayer. Two minutes after he arrived home, a deafening explosion ripped through the neighbourhood, engulfing the narrow street in black smoke.

“I hid in the corner of the building, and smoke crept in through the windows,” 28-year-old Ali told The Intercept.

“Then the smell hit me, and I could barely breathe.”

As soon as he could, he bolted from his hiding place and ran to the scene of the explosion, and the house where he had left his family.

It had been hit by an airstrike from U.S.-led coalition forces bombing Islamic State fighters.

Corpses were everywhere in the ruins of the building; more than 200 people were reportedly killed. Ali’s wife was among them, but he wouldn’t know that until Iraqi civil defense forces found her body later that day. Ali heard the sound of a child groaning underneath the rubble. It was his daughter, Awra. Her body was charred black with severe burns, and shrapnel had pierced through the side of her head, cutting across her face, and sealing her eyes shut. Miraculously, she was breathing.

“I lifted her up, and started carrying her through the streets, but then an ISIS sniper started to shoot at the army,” Ali said.

“I finally was able to leave her at the neighbours for a few minutes, and then take her to the field hospital once the fighting calmed down.”

A hospital bed at West Erbil Emergency in Erbil, Iraq on March 4, 2017. Photo: Cengiz Yar for The Intercept

 

Transferred between field hospitals and waiting for hours at checkpoints, Ali and Awra made it to the casualties ward of the West Erbil Emergency Hospital, 50 miles from Mosul and away from the front line. Doctors treated Awra’s infections and set her broken leg in a cast. A few days ago, they operated on her to dislodge a piece of shrapnel from her eye, restoring her vision for the first time since the airstrike.

Though her face is still scarred from burns and shrapnel cuts, Awra is enjoying her newly-recovered sense of sight. She flipped through a picture book and played with leftover gauze, winding and unwinding a fake cast on her uninjured leg, laughing and energetic.

Her grandmother, Alia, tried to keep the child from itching the raw wounds on her head, scolding gently,

“You can’t touch it — you will make it hurt more.”

With Awra’s mother’s passing, Alia is tending to her full-time. The doctors at West Erbil have been overwhelmed with patients from the airstrike in al Jadida, and so it is Alia who dresses Awra’s wounds.

“Every day, there is more shrapnel,” Alia said, sitting on the linoleum floor of the hospital, stroking the tuft of brown hair on Awra’s head that is growing back after it was shaved to remove the first pieces of metal when she arrived at the hospital. Bits of shrapnel are still coming out of her head wounds, and larger pieces remain lodged in her legs.

Ala’a Ali, 28, stands in his 4-year-old daughter Awra’s hospital room at West Erbil Emergency in Erbil, Iraq on April 10, 2017. Photo: Cengiz Yar for The Intercept

 

“These airstrikes are the biggest of all of the crimes in this war,” Alia said.

“They’re killing families and children. We can’t live in safety, so long as they continue.”

Downstairs, Mubasher Zanoon sat next to his sleeping brother, who is his last remaining sibling after 20 of his family members perished in the same strike that nearly blinded Awra. The brother’s arm is pinned in place, barely intact.

“We don’t have anything left to go back to,” he said.

Zanoon escaped the attack by seeking shelter in one of the adjacent homes, and it was four days before he was able to find his brother in the ruins.

The month of March saw an unprecedented number of civilian casualties from coalition airstrikes in both Iraq and Syria. While the strikes have been crucial in assisting the Iraqi Security Forces to recapture Mosul from the Islamic State, as the fight moves closer into the Old City, narrower streets and older buildings means a greater concentration of civilians — and greater potential for deadly incidents like the strike that hit Awra.

The Pentagon has acknowledged that it struck a truck full of explosives in the area on March 17, and that the attack may have caused civilian deaths, though there are conflicting reports about the precise number of casualties and their cause. Major General Najim al-Jabbouri, the Iraqi Security Forces Commander in charge of Mosul operations, told The Intercept that there may have been an ISIS car bomb or “an ISIS booby trap that also contributed to civilian casualties.” He stated that the airstrike had hit one building, killing 101 civilians; an Iraqi civil defense official told the Los Angeles Times that there were several homes struck, and 278 victims had been removed from the rubble. Other local groups put the death toll even higher.

Adding to the confusion, the March 17 strike was not the only coalition airstrike in al Jadida that week; just four days before, another attack killed as many as 29 civilians, according to the U.K.-based monitoring group Airwars. Due to the neighbourhood’s dangerous position near the front line, Iraqi civil defense forces did not reach the scene until after March 17, and some of the bodies included in their casualty count may have been rotting for days.

“What is absolutely clear is that a significant number of civilians died primarily as a result of incoming air and ground bombardments from both the U.S.-backed coalition and the Iraqi forces,” said Chris Woods, a conflict specialist with Airwars.

In all, Airwars estimates a minimum of 2,900 civilians have died from coalition strikes in both Iraq and Syria since 2014. The Pentagon has acknowledged killing 229.

Awra Ali, 4, on her hospital bed at West Erbil Emergency in Erbil, Iraq on April 10, 2017. (posed) Photo: Cengiz Yar for The Intercept

 

Source*

Related Topics:

U.S. Airstrikes Slaughter 230 Innocent Civilians in a Single Night in Mosul*

2,000 ISIL Terrorists Killed in Mosul Liberation Operation*

Iraqi Forces Kill over 950 ISIS Terrorists in Mosul*

U.S. Airstrikes on Iraqi Army Slowing Advance on Mosul*

US-led Coalition Airstrikes Kill 60+ Civilians in Mosul*

Iraqi Army Drops Leaflets over Mosul ahead of Battle*

Iraqi Air Force Destroys ISIL Shari’ah Court in Mosul*

The Collapse of Iraq’s Mosul Dam*

Iraqi and Kurdish Forces Retrieve Mosul Dam from ISIL*

ISIL Faces Mosul Residents in Defence of Shrine*

What You Aren’t Being Told About The Iraqi ISIS Offensive*

A Native Perspective on War, Terrorism and the MOAB Bomb*

A Native Perspective on War, Terrorism and the MOAB Bomb*

By Mark Charles

“Mother of All Bombs” blast in Afghanistan on Thursday

 

Friday morning the hosts of Fox and Friends celebrated Thursday’s dropping of the MOAB bomb by the United States military against ISIS in Afghanistan. This was the largest non-nuclear bomb ever detonated in combat, and they aired the video of the explosion to the song by Toby Keith, “Courtesy of the Red, White and Blue.” One of the hosts commented that the video is in black and white, “But that is what freedom looks like. That’s the red, white and blue.” Geraldo Rivera then added that one of his favourite things in the 16 years he’s been on FOX News is watching bombs drop on bad guys.

Last week, after the U.S. launched a barrage of missiles against Syria in retaliation for chemical weapons Assad utilized against civilians, Brian Williams, speaking on MSNBC said he was tempted to quote the great Leonard Cohen, “I am guided by the beauty of our weapons.” Brian went on to describe the missile launch scene as “beautiful pictures of fearsome armaments.”

Terrorism is evil and needs to be confronted. But when we go beyond confronting terrorism to blatantly celebrating the deaths of terrorists, and praising the beauty of our weapons that destroyed them, we are blurring the lines of humanity. And once those lines are crossed, and we dehumanize our enemy, it is a short and slippery slope to becoming the very thing we claim to be fighting against. Soon, we begin looking for prominent religious leaders and institutions to provide theological cover for our violence, and justification for our actions.

 As a follower of Jesus, who was a tribal man brutally executed by a state working in conjunction with its religious leaders…

As a Navajo man, whose ancestors endured acts of genocide and forced removal by a United States government that was armed with a Doctrine of Discovery, and therefore believed it had a manifest destiny to ethnically cleanse and rule these lands from sea to shining sea…

And, as the grandson of indigenous grandparents, who were taken from their homes and educated in boarding schools run by a government and churches that believed it was their civic and religious duty to “kill the Indian to save the man”…

I humbly offer some words of caution.

May we not celebrate war.

May we not glorify violence.

May we not dehumanize our enemies.

For if we could refuse to dehumanize our enemies, it would make the terribleness of war all the more real. And maybe, just maybe, cause us to engage in it less often.

MARK CHARLES

(Navajo)

Source*

Related Topics:

U.S. has Killed over 20 Million People in 37 “Victim Nations” Since World War II*

Trump Wastes over $94mn in Taxpayer’s Money on Ineffective Syrian Airstrikes*

“Hitler Never Gassed His Own People” but the U.S. Did*

Bolivian U.N. Ambassador Blasts U.S. for Another Illegal Attack*

Media Goes Quiet as Russia Exposes U.S. Lies at Security Council*

Rothschild Demands Western Nations Invade Syria*

Former U.K. Ambassador Refers to the West Returning to their Own Vomit

Syria Shoots Down 34 of 59 Cruise Missiles, Russia to Upgrade System*

Cheney, Rothschild, Murdoch Violate International Law By Drilling for Oil in Syria*

U.N. Confirmed Syrian Rebels, Not Assad, Were Using Sarin*

Trump Bombed Syria because they Didn’t Want Peace*

Noble Energy’s Natural Gas Discovery in the Levant Launched U.S.-Israeli Operation ISIS to Oust Assad*

World War 3: Trump Begins Paying His Penance to Rothschilds*

Pentagon Trained Al Qaeda in Syria to Use Chemical Weapons*

Deep State in Panic Mode, Creating Events to Distract from their Activities*

The FBI Played a Central Role in the First ISIS Attack on U.S. Soil*

Disturbing Message to All Americans from Former Defense Minister of Canada on the NWO*

 

Products of Genome Editing, Synthetic Biology are GMOs – German environment minister*

Products of Genome Editing, Synthetic Biology are GMOs – German environment minister*

Minister Dr Barbara Hendricks’ assurance will come as blow to GMO industry and its allies

 

The products of synthetic biology and organisms generated by genome editing are GMOs and fall under E.U. GMO law, says Dr Barbara Hendricks, the German federal minister for environment, nature conservation, building and nuclear safety. As such, Hendricks is convinced that they must be subjected to a risk assessment within the framework of that law.

The minister’s assurance will come as a blow to the GMO industry and its allies, who are attempting to get the products of the new genome editing techniques exempted from the E.U.’s GMO regulation and labelling requirement.

Hendricks’ view was set out in a letter to the research organisation Testbiotech from Dr Elsa Nickel, director of the ministry, which is known in Germany as the BMUB. Dr Nickel was asked by Dr. Hendricks to respond to Testbiotech’s questions about the new GM techniques.

Dr. Nickel adds in her letter, “Although we have some criticism of the environmental risk assessment in some areas and need to be continually adapted to new challenges, I believe that the genetic engineering regulation is a suitable tool to regulate these new techniques and, if necessary, to ban them if a risk to the environment is established.

“The BMUB will continue to apply genetic engineering legislation for the classification of genome editing and further new breeding procedures. The BMUB is also committed to the further development of risk assessment in the approval process.”

Source*

Related Topics:

New Gene Editing Technique on Human Embryos*

160 Global Groups Call for Moratorium on New Genetic Extinction Technology at U.N. Convention*

Genetic Engineering to Clash with Evolution, Naturally*

Genetically Modified Human Embryos Allowed in U.K.*

U.S. Experts Call for Ban on Genetic Modification of Children*

Powerful DNA Editing Has Arrived*

Biotech’s Dark Promise of Involuntary Cannibalism for All*