Archive | March 11, 2016

Navy Secretly Conducting Electromagnetic Warfare Training on U.S. Public*

Navy Secretly Conducting Electromagnetic Warfare Training on U.S. Public*

By Dahr Jamail

Without public notification of any kind, the U.S/ Navy has secretly been conducting electromagnetic warfare testing and training on public roads in western Washington State for more than five years.

An email thread between the Navy and the U.S. Forest Service between 2010 and 2012, recently obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by Oregon-based author and activist Carol Van Strum in November 2014, revealed that the Navy has likely been driving mobile electromagnetic warfare emitters and conducting electromagnetic warfare training in the Olympic National Forest and on public roads on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula since 2010.

In one of the 2012 emails, Navy contractor Gerald Sodano explained that the Navy

“utilized EW [electronic warfare] ranges outside the local vicinity.”

But he went on to say that the aim of establishing an electromagnetic warfare range on the Olympic Peninsula would be to conduct all training locally on the Olympic Peninsula, rather than further afield. This means that rather than using expansive training areas the Navy already has access to in Yakima in eastern Washington State, the Navy aims to use the Olympic National Forest and areas adjacent to Olympic National Park instead.

As Truthout previously reported,

the Navy itself has produced a medical study showing that exposure to electromagnetic radiation causes a myriad of human health problems, including corneal damage, tubular degeneration of testicles, brain heating, sterility, altered penile function, death, cranial nerve disorders, seizures, convulsions, depression, insomnia, chest pain, and even sparking between dental fillings.

Other reports by the U.S. Air Force, NASA, medical doctors and scientific publications confirm these and other deleterious health effects that would result from the Navy’s electromagnetic weaponry arsenal, in addition to large-scale negative impacts on birds, aquatic life and other biota.

As Truthout previously reported, the Navy intends to conduct widespread electromagnetic warfare training across much of the Olympic Peninsula, which would entail flying as many as 153 jets down to 1,200 feet above ground in some areas, in 2,900 training exercises lasting up to 16 hours per day, 260 days per year, with no end date in sight.

The Navy’s plans also include setting up mobile units on the ground, with towers emitting electromagnetic radiation signals for the planes to locate as part of their exercises. According to an email from Naval Warfare Range Manager Kent Mathes, if the Navy gets its way, there will be 275 “events” per year, between the mobile emitters and ships at sea. (This information is not mentioned in any public documents.) The definition of “event” is not clear, but according to other Navy documents, a single event can last from a few minutes to several days. If combined, the total number of events for the Olympic, Okanogan-Wenatchee and Colville National Forests will be over 5,000.

Sodano also stated the Navy’s intent to drive the mobile emitters “on existing roads and trails throughout the Olympic Peninsula,” and “all through most of the region as well as outside the geographic confines of the MOAs (Military Operating Areas) to optimize and vary training scenarios.”

This means that while the Navy has been under widespread and growing public pressure against its proposed electromagnetic warfare training on the Olympic Peninsula starting this year, it has in fact already been secretly conducting training for at least five years in the Olympic National Forest and on public roads across the entire Olympic Peninsula.

“Tested Well With Aircraft”

Further documentation obtained through FOIA requests makes it clear that the electromagnetic “games” have already been underway for some time. A map from a permit issued by the Forest Service to the Navy in 2011 is labelled “Results of Area Review 14-18 November In Support of Navy Electronic Warfare Training in the Northwest.”

Further along in that document the same map is labelled “Proposed Areas of Review in support of Navy Electronic Warfare Training.” The first shows mobile emitter sites in Olympic National Forest that “tested well with aircraft,” and includes a photo of a truck-and-trailer mobile emitter parked at several sites and a campground area.

Both maps include Hood Canal Road and the entire length of Route 101 on the Olympic Peninsula, which is the most popular tourist route in the area. The public road leading to the world-renowned Hoh Rainforest is also shown as a mobile emitter route. The Hoh Tribe, which has lived there for centuries, was not consulted by the Navy. The tribe’s only notification of the training has been a marked increase in low-flying jet traffic. These public roads are listed as “Areas in Support” in the electromagnetic warfare training maps.

Taken together, these documents are an apparent admission that the Navy has already been conducting electromagnetic warfare training in the area, despite their own claims to the contrary.

Olympic Park Road via Shutterstock; Edited; LW / TO

The general public remained unaware of the establishment of an electromagnetic warfare range over any portion of the Olympic Peninsula until late September 2014, about six weeks after the Navy’s 15-day comment period on an environmental assessment (EA) closed. The Navy issued a “finding of no significant impact.” A few days later, the subject was closed and no further opportunity for public comment was allowed, despite the fact that no comments had ever been received by the Navy from elected officials, Native American tribes or individual residents – because nobody knew about it.

Meanwhile, within the government, the Navy’s plans were not meeting even minimum standards. A little over a month before the short time the Navy’s EA was open for public comment, a Forest Service employee, in a document obtained by Truthout, commented,

“This document [the EA] does not meet minimum Forest Service standards for completeness and based on this document the Forest Service could not prepare a Decision that would need to be signed by the Deciding Official prior to issuing a permit.”

Another employee comment said,

“USFWS [US Fish and Wildlife Service] and USFS will require review of a DRAFT Wildlife Biological Assessment prior to submittal for informal or formal consultation.”

But the Navy replied that it would not do a biological assessment, and instead would “expand the discussion” on threatened and endangered species in the EA itself.

One of the frontline opponents of the Navy’s plans in Washington State is Karen Sullivan, who herself worked for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in the Division of Endangered Species and External Affairs, for 15 and a half years. Her experience ranges across many locations, from Delaware, to Washington, DC, to Alaska, and she now resides in Port Townsend, on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State.

“Anyone who reads the EA will see that expanded discussion is 100% boilerplate and contains no specific information on impacts,” Sullivan told Truthout.

In that EA and at subsequent public information meetings requested by Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-Washington), the Navy stressed that establishing a 100-foot perimeter around each mobile emitter and marking it with hazard tape was sufficient to protect humans and wildlife from any harm. It claimed that any humans or large mammals entering the hazard area would cause the emitter equipment to be shut down for safety reasons.

“Effects on small mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians were completely ignored, despite the fact that all 15 Olympic National Forest and state-owned sites selected by the Navy for the mobile emitters are in critical habitat for endangered species,” Sullivan said.

“They even said that amphibians were unlikely to be found at the sites they’d chosen, and the Forest Service did not dispute this. Do they not realize it’s a rainforest?”

High Low Frequencies Effect on the bodyHer concerns – and those of a broad swath of the public across the Olympic Peninsula where the Navy’s war games are to occur – are well founded, by the Navy’s own admission. In an interview with the Peninsula Daily News, Sodano admitted that 15 minutes of exposure to the radiation emitted by the Navy’s electromagnetic warfare trucks could damage the liquid tissue of the eye.

Despite all the public outcry, and all the scientific evidence that backs it up, the Forest Service has indicated that it will issue the Navy a permit later this year, to use its forest roads.

The first hint that the Navy was already conducting electromagnetic warfare training in Olympic National Forest appeared on November 6, 2014, when high levels of public outrage forced Representative Kilmer to urge the Navy to hold public briefings.

Much of the public was already outraged at the Navy’s proposed plans for electromagnetic warfare training, and more than 100 people packed the Port Angeles City Council chambers for a public presentation by Naval Warfare Range Manager Kent Mathes, Forest Service District Ranger Dean Millett and the Navy’s John Mosher.

At this time, the public had no hint that the Navy was already doing this training on public roads.

During the presentation, however, Mathes announced,

“The Navy has been doing this sort of training for years.”

Perhaps because no one in the audience knew the Navy was already conducting this training, no one understood what Mathes meant by his overt admission.

An audience member who identified himself as a 24-year veteran of the Army took the microphone during the meeting and told the audience,

“He [Forest Service District Ranger Millett] told me he’s issued permits for a few years and that they have these mobile emitter units out there, and I want to know, have they been out there, and if they have, how’d you get consent to do that?”

In response, the Navy’s John Mosher provided a long, obfuscated response:

So no, they’re not out there currently, as a conceptual test prior to environmental assessment we did apply for temporary permits, this was a one-time use to go to those particular sites to determine if they’re feasible for what we’re proposing. So we went there with the equipment, to be able to do the electromagnetic environmental safety surveys that I mentioned so we could conduct those tests, so we went out there with a piece of equipment, with the proper approvals and permits to do it, and we basically used these meters to determine what the distance of effects would be, if it in fact was consistent with the modelling that was done, the industry standards that we mentioned.

Given that the Navy has admitted in emails and other documents that it has already been running its mobile emitters on public roads unbeknownst to the public (with no “hazard zone” in place), how can it possibly propose to safely operate said emitters within a 100-foot hazard exclusion zone?

The Navy’s First Public Admission?

Unsatisfied, the Army veteran asked, “Well how long have you been doing that, though, you said about three years at least?”

“No no,” Mosher replied. “I’m not sure what you’re referring to now, the training, the electronic warfare training, that Kent just mentioned, so we’ve been doing that training …”

“You’ve been doing that through the permits,” the veteran asked. “Weren’t you guys?”

“… On the ground … no,” Mosher said. “We have not been doing it for three years, we had that one-time, special-use permit…”

At this point, the audience demanded that Millett comment on having granted the Navy a special-use permit to conduct electromagnetic warfare training.

“As you said, as Mr. Mosher (unintelligible) we did issue a short-term temporary, uh, special-use permit for the, uh, proof of concept,” Millett replied awkwardly.

“I can’t remember exactly how many years it … I might have said three years at the time but if it was less than that …”

Mathes interjected at this point in the discussion to tell Millett that the permit was granted in 2011.

“So it was 2011,” Millett said.

After the meeting, Sullivan wrote to the Forest Service asking about the 2011 permit, and the agency replied that it had issued four short-term permits to the Navy for “feasibility tests of the Integrated Air Defense System.”

The letter, of which Sullivan provided a copy to Truthout, continued, “The first of the four temporary permits was authorized in 2010 and the last of the four was authorized at the beginning of 2014.”

FOIA materials revealed that Millett had signed every one of them.

One clear implication of the above remarks by Millett, Mathes and Mosher is that such lies by federal officials are illegal. Under 18 US Code § 1515, “misleading conduct” is described as:

(A) knowingly making a false statement;

(B) intentionally omitting information from a statement and thereby causing a portion of such statement to be misleading, or intentionally concealing a material fact, and thereby creating a false impression by such statement;

(C) with intent to mislead, knowingly submitting or inviting reliance on a writing or recording that is false, forged, altered, or otherwise lacking in authenticity.

(D) with intent to mislead, knowingly submitting or inviting reliance on a sample, specimen, map, photograph, boundary mark, or other object that is misleading in a material respect; or

(E) knowingly using a trick, scheme or device, with intent to mislead.

The officials’ comments and obfuscations fall under several of these categories. The Navy and federal government were plainly denying Washingtonians access to the facts about what was really taking place in their state.

Washington State in the Dark?

Apparently, it was not only the general public that was unaware the Navy had already been conducting electromagnetic warfare on state roads; officials within the state government were also kept in the dark.

In March 2015, Sullivan contacted the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) asking for any records indicating that the Navy had applied for a permit to conduct electromagnetic warfare on public roads. WSDOT responded immediately, and a phone conversation between Sullivan and WSDOT’s Joni Higgins revealed that WSDOT was shocked that such activity might have been happening on public roads.

Higgins confirmed that no such permit category even existed.

Another WSDOT employee, speaking on condition of anonymity, verified for Truthout that WSDOT had not been consulted or notified by the Navy regarding any electromagnetic warfare training involving roads or highways in the state.

Truthout’s request for comment from Washington Gov. Jay Inslee’s office was not replied to at the time of this writing.

Overwhelming Evidence of Harm

How invasive – or downright harmful – are the mobile emitters the Navy is using? The Navy regularly compares these emitters to cellphone towers, but in the aforementioned email thread, Navy representative Sodano said,

“This system is the same as, or similar to, civilian navigational aids and radars at local airports and television weather stations throughout the United States.”

If that is true, it contradicts the cell tower analogy: Exposure to radar of any strength is still considered by the radar and electromagnetic radiation equipment manufacturing industry to be harmful, while exposure to cellphones or cell towers is supposedly not.

Yet even if we accept the cell tower comparison, the emitters aren’t off the hook. Any claim that cell towers are completely safe is contradicted by many peer-reviewed studies, as well as a 2014 letter from the US Department of the Interior to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), on its inadequate standards for cellphone towers.

None of the public documents on the Navy’s war games has ever discussed any potential impacts from the downward-directed electromagnetic radiation coming from jets overhead, which are equipped with weaponized lasers and microwaves, as well as a powerful type of radar known as active electronically scanned array.

The Navy’s own web page on radio-frequency hazard avoidance concerns only heat effects, but has a strong requirement that aircraft radars be turned away from personnel areas.

However, the Navy’s response to public concerns about deleterious health effects from its war games has been to point people toward its own inadequate environmental assessment (EA). The military branch continues to claim that “no significant impacts” will result from its electromagnetic war games.

Dr. Martin Pall, a professor emeritus of Washington State University, has written several peer-reviewed papers on how electromagnetic radiation of various levels impacts human beings, and has given international lectures on the subject.

Pall told Truthout that the Navy’s claims of safety are “untrue,” and provided reams of evidence, including his own scientific reports, which document the extremely dangerous impacts of even very low levels of the microwave and electromagnetic radiation that the Navy would be emitting during its war games.

According to Pall, there is ample evidence of biological effects from EMF radiation that are “extremely worrisome.” These include cellular DNA damage that causes cancer and infertility, and, Pall said, “both of these have been repeatedly reported to occur with low-level exposures.”

“What the Navy is doing we have no idea because they don’t tell us,” Pall told Truthout.

“But from what little they have told us, they are using a lot of pulse fields in wavelengths that are damaging to us, to biological organisms. They give us not one iota of evidence of what biological effects are produced by those fields, and don’t even tell us what fields they are using. You only find empty statements of ‘don’t worry about these things.’”

An April 1981 NASA study titled “Electromagnetic Field Interactions with the Human Body: Observed Effects and Theories” revealed the significant damage that EMF radiation causes to humans.

As for adverse effects from EMF radiation, the NASA report states, “Some result in death and persistent disease,” with other impacts including “ventricular fibrillation and sudden infant death syndrome,” “cataracts” and “accelerated aging.” It notes that electromagnetic fields “may promote cancer” and cause a “decrease in sex function.”

In fact, the Navy itself has published a medical study warning of the extremely harmful health effects of exposure to even low levels of electromagnetic radiation. The Navy has known about these effects since at least 1971, when the Naval Medical Research Institute published a research report written by Dr. Zorach Glaser, of which Truthout acquired a copy. The title of the report is “Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘Effects’) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation.”

Given that the Navy continues to claim that its electromagnetic warfare training exercises will have “no significant impact” on humans, it is interesting to note that its own research paper’s abstract states:

More than 2,000 references on the biological responses to [microwave and] radio frequency and microwave radiation, published up to June 1971, are included in the bibliography. (Three supplementary listings bring the number of citations to more than 2,300.) Particular attention has been paid to the effects on man of non-ionizing radiation at these frequencies.

The Navy’s paper lists well over 100 negative biological effects caused by microwave and radio frequency radiations, including: corneal damage, tubular degeneration of testicles, brain heating, alteration of the diameter of blood vessels, liver enlargement, altered sex ratio of births, decreased fertility, sterility, altered fetal development, decreased lactation in nursing mothers, altered penal function, death, cranial nerve disorders, seizures, convulsions, depression, insomnia, hand tremors, chest pain, thrombosis, alteration in the rate of cellular division, anorexia, constipation, altered adrenal cortex activity, chromosome aberrations, tumors, altered orientation of animals, birds and fish, loss of hair and sparking between dental fillings.

Given all of these severe health impacts, it is clear why so many people in Washington State are now concerned about the fact that the Navy has been secretly conducting electromagnetic warfare training on state roads as well as in the Olympic, Okanogan-Wenatchee and Colville National Forests.

“Chances are that for several years, motorists could have unknowingly encountered mobile emitters while driving, or could have parked near them at campgrounds or roadside pullouts,” Sullivan concluded. “If the mobile emitters are conducting electronic warfare without hazard zones and with jets overhead sending down their own EM radiation, how is that not considered a public health hazard?”


Related Topics:

The Electro-magnetic Warfare on our Consciousness*

Lloyds Nullifies Health Insurance against Mobiles Phones, Wi-Fi and EMF/EMR*

Conscientious Scientists Make an Int’l Appeal on the Wide-scale Problem of Wi-fi*

Schoolgirl Found Hanged after Developing Allergic Reaction to School Wi-Fi*

Flint Tax Payers to foot Gov. Synder’s $500,000 Attorney’s Fee*

Flint Tax Payers to foot Gov. Synder’s $500,000 Attorney’s Fee*

For a Governor that has already managed to maintain world-wide notoriety for poisoning the people of Flint in the Michigan water crisis, Gov. Flint is yet to learn to stop. It has just been reported in several media outlets, that Rick Synder has just hired legal representation at the cost of the tax payer he poisoned. Five hundred thousand big ones, to be exact.

A mass inundation of lawsuits have started pouring in against former state employees and Gov. Synder. Listed as defendants in these cases relating to the poisoned water, the office faces an investigation by multiple departments, including the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Overall, a lot of people want answers.

It isn’t surprising then, that Gov. Synder has hired legal representation. It isn’t an unlikely move to find an attorney to hopefully lessen the blow with multiple lawsuits and class actions. However, unlike those who are pursuing the lawsuit – who pay from their own pockets – Synder has the tab covered. According to Crain’s Detroit Business spread, Gov. Snyder has hired outside attorneys for the pending litigation.

“Eugene Driker, a member with Detroit-based Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker PLLC, will assist with civil representation in addition to the state attorney general’s office, Snyder spokesman Ari Adler told Crain’s in an email.

Brian Lennon, a partner with Warner Norcross and Judd LLP in Grand Rapids, has been hired as “investigatory counsel,” Adler said. That includes work searching and processing emails and documents,” it reports.

Both attorneys come at a hefty price tag of $249,000 each for hours worked, with their contracts ending Dec. 31 this year.

The just-shy-of half a million dollar bill will be picked up by the taxpayer. Gov. Rick Snyder won’t be dipping into his private funds for this one, let me assure you. While the citizen contributes to their legal action if they want to pursue it; while they’re figuring out how not to go bankrupt with the house they can’t sell, or the foreclosure they face because they refuse to pay for the water that has poisoned them…

Snyder gets a free ride on the backs of those he has destroyed.


Related Topics:

EPA Head in Charge of Flint Resigns as Obama Pledges $80mn for Poisoned Water Crisis*

Matt Damon Calls on Governor Snyder to Resign Over Flint Water Crisis*

U.S. Continues to Poison the People of Flint*

Water Contamination in Jackson City*

U.S. Needs Israel to Extend Power in Middle East, and is Willing to Pay Big*

U.S. Needs Israel to Extend Power in Middle East, and is Willing to Pay Big*

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden arrived in Israel on Tuesday, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cancelled a visit to the White House scheduled for later in March. Professor Ghada Talhami told Sputnik’s Brian Becker that the relationship between Israel and the U.S. is still defined by Washington lobbyists, and by America’s dominating outlook.

The U.S. has long turned a blind eye to Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian territories, and during Biden’s previous official visit to Israel, the Netanyahu government announced the construction of additional settlements. According to Talhami, one of the reasons why the U.S. cannot take effective action against Israel, America’s biggest recipient of foreign aid, is the power of the Israeli lobby in Washington, DC.

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden

“The work of the Israeli lobby has been unbelievable in the United States, to the extent that [Arabs in the U.S.] call the United States Congress ‘Israeli occupied territory’” Talhami said.

“This is quite a machine; it has been built over the years and…has managed to restrain the chief executive in our government.”

Considering that 2016 is an election year in the U.S., the Democratic party, represented by Biden and Obama, “cannot afford” an estranged relationship with Israel, Talhami said. This would appear to explain Biden’s visit to the Middle East country.

“Everybody had great hope for [Obama],” the professor stated.

“People expected some kind of a different attitude towards at least the Israeli settlements, but he was doing exactly the same thing as his predecessors.”

The power of the Israeli lobby is not the only factor maintaining the strong historic alignment between Israel and the United States, the professor asserted. There is also America’s geostrategic outlook, in which the U.S. needs Israel to extend its power in the Middle East, a resource-rich and geostrategically important part of the world.

That is, in part, why Israel receives $4 billion from the U.S. annually, mostly in military armament. And now America plans to increase its aid by more than $40 billion over the next ten years.

“United States is not such a weak country that it can be led by the nose by the Israel lobby,” Talhami said.

“Clearly there are people in the American government…probably the CIA and the military, who still see their interests combined with the interests of Israel, and actually they are happy with the relationship the way it is.”

As for the clashes between Israeli settlers, citizens and Palestinians, the professor blames corporate-owned media outlets for feeding the American public lies, as it continually presents the Palestinians as terrorists.

“There are few Israeli soldiers or civilians, settlers who actually get killed. Most of the people who get killed are Palestinian kids,” she said.

“The Palestinians also have a right to defend themselves. [They] have rights under international law, and their rights under international law are they should not be occupied, their land should not be taken from them, they should not be abused at the checkpoints on a daily basis.”

According to the professor, the only hope now is that Obama “has the courage” to take some action in the final months of his presidency, for example, by withholding American economic aid from Israel, which the country spends to enlarge and secure settlements in illegally-seized territories.


Related Topics:

The Israeli Invasion and Gaza’s Offshore Gas Fields*

MOSSAD Agent – ‘We Did the London Bombing’

Israel Takes Advantage of Syrian Civil War to Expand Illegal Golan Heights Settlements*

U.S. and Israel is Managing Combat Operations for ISIS and al Nusra in Iraq, Syria*

Israel Grants Oil Rights in Syria to Murdoch and Rothschild*

Israel Considers Full Annexation of Sinai*

Egypt Votes for Israel at U.N. on ‘Peaceful Uses of Outer Space’*

Israel Embassy in Cairo Reopens after 4-year Hiatus*

Israeli Troops Heavily Deployed Near Lebanon*

Pentagon and Israel behind Tunisian Ramadhan Attack*

Saudi Arabia to allow Israel Airspace to Strike Iran*

Nearly Every Western Country has an Israel Lobby*

French Journalist Arrested for Exposing Israeli Connection to Paris False Flag*

Pegida-U.K. — Smoke, Mirrors and Zionism*

Cultural Marxism and Satanism*

Letter to Karl Marx from Baruch Levy 1928*

Israeli Troops Heavily Deployed Near Lebanon*

Israeli Troops Heavily Deployed Near Lebanon*

Israeli troops patrolling near the village of Kfar Kila, Lebanon (photo by AP)

The Israeli army has heavily deployed troops and equipment along the Lebanese border and stepped up military activities there, a report from Beirut says.

For the second day on Wednesday, Israeli troops fired tear gas canisters at Lebanese herders and farmers working near the border with the occupied Palestinian territories, The Daily Star reported.

“We were proceeding with our lives normally and everyone was working their land. Then we saw the Israeli patrol and its members begin shooting tear gas at us,” Mustafa Ahmad, one of the herders, said.

Residents said the Israeli army repeatedly shot tear gas canisters during the morning. Hours later, a large number of Israeli troops were stationed in an Israeli settlement across the Lebanese village of Kfar Kila.

According to witness accounts, Israeli troops used trees and shrubs for cover and monitored the movements within Lebanon as motorized patrols were conducted.

Local sources say Israeli patrols along the border have increased in the past week , with soldiers taking up ambush positions in the area.

The activities have sparked fears among local residents, who question the motives behind Israel’s latest transgression, The Daily Star said.

Israeli soldier peering through his weapon scope while on patrol near the Lebanese border. (photo by AP)

Israeli war plans 

The new report comes after the Beirut-based al-Akhbar newspaper said on Saturday that Israel was seeking to launch a new war on Lebanon.

According to the paper, U.S. officials have warned Beirut that Tel Aviv was looking for a pretext to attack Lebanon and told the Arab country’s leaders “not to give Israel an excuse to start a war.”

U.S. officials had been informed by their Israeli counterparts that Tel Aviv is interested in a new war, particularly in light of Saudi Arabia’s strategic shift in policy, al-Akhbar said.

Last month, Riyadh said it had suspended USD 3 billion in military assistance to the Lebanese military and another USD 1 billion to the country’s internal security forces.

Saudi Arabia later forced Persian Gulf Arab states to issue a statement, labelling Lebanon’s resistance movement Hezbollah a terrorist organization.

According to al-Akhbar, the Saudi decision to suspend military assistance and the consequent move to declare Hezbollah a “terrorist organization” have “whetted Israel’s appetite” for conflict with the resistance movement.

Israel launched two wars on Lebanon in 2000 and 2006. About 1,200 Lebanese, most of them civilians, lost their lives during the 33-day war in the summer of 2006.

Hezbollah is credited with driving Israeli troops out of southern Lebanon and defeating them in subsequent wars.

It is also helping the Syrian army fight Takfiri militants in a war which the resistance movement sees crucial to preventing the conflict from spilling over to Lebanon.

Lebanon to respond firmly 

In reaction to reports of possible Israeli plans for a new war, Lebanon’s army chief Jean Kahwagi said on Monday that Beirut was fully prepared to repel all types of threats.

“The army is today stronger than at any time before. Security on the border and inside the country is under control,” he said.

The Lebanese army has been fighting militants near the border with Syria.

“The army will remain at the highest level of readiness on all fronts of responsibility and duty, from fighting terrorism on the border, to defending against Israel and its schemes, to spreading security and stability in the interior,” Kahwagi said.


Related Topics:

Israel’s Latest War in the Planning Eight Years*

Greater Israel” Requires the Breaking up of Existing Arab States*

Captured Israeli Officer Details Israeli-ISIS Plan to Wipe-out all Islamic and Muslim Culture and Prevent Religions Coming Together*

Colour ‘Revolution’ in Lebanon: From Piles of Trash to Piles of Rubble*

ISIS and Nusra Warring in East Lebanon*

Christians Join Forces with Muslim Group Hezbollah to Fight ISIS in Lebanon*

Iran and Hezbollah Removed from U.S. Intel. Terrorist List*

Syrian Army and Hezbullah Push back al-Qaeda as Christian Militia Mobilizes*

Israeli-Made Weapons Seized by Hezbollah in Zabadani*

The Irish Economy is Soaring, even though most of Europe Isn’t*

The Irish Economy is Soaring, even though most of Europe Isn’t*

Ireland’s economy has grown at the fastest rate since 2000.

The 7.8% boost to all business done in the country last year outstrips every other European country and is built mainly around continued demand for exports and resurgent high street spending.

Finance Minister Michael Noonan claimed the revival was a direct consequence of the policies pursued by the outgoing government, which was hammered in last month’s election, and people’s sacrifices

The Government will continue to work so that the benefits of economic recovery are more widely distributed and that the unemployment rate is reduced further,” he said.

The figures, more associated with boom times, were recorded by the Central Statistics Office (CSO) and showed all sectors of the economy were growing.

Even when the profits of the multinationals are stripped out the report was positive with Irish owned businesses booking growth of 5.7% over the course of last year.

There was also a surge in the amount of trade done in the last three months of the year – 2.9% growth in Gross Domestic Product.

The value of industry rose by 13.7%, with manufacturing recording 14.2% growth, building and construction 8.8% and the distribution, transport, software and communications sector increasing by 8.7%.

Agriculture improved by 6.4% and other services by 4.3%.

The CSO pointed to an additional €10bn spend last year on what it classed as “intangibles” and also highlighted the strong demand for cars.

Business lobby group Ibec said the report highlighted strong domestic economic recovery – the best year since recession hit in 2007.

The group’s economist Gerard Brady said: “The growth in domestic demand represents a crucial turning point for the Irish economy and will boost household living standards across the board.”

Ibec claimed the economic recovery was reaching “every corner of the country”, a message at odds with how the election played out.

But Mr Brady accepted:

“The key challenge for the next government will be building the kind of economic resilience, which we have seen in the Dublin economy, into the regions.

“This can only be achieved by investing much more ambitiously in infrastructure in key centres and growing the exporting enterprise base in the regions.”

Mr Noonan added:

“Economic growth is now more broadly balanced. Domestic spending increased strongly once again, reflecting the ongoing improvement in confidence. This is very important as the domestic sectors are both jobs and tax intensive.

“The exporting sectors also recorded very strong growth, with exports of goods and services almost 14% higher in 2015 compared to 2014.”


Related Topics:

‘I’ for Iceland and Now Ireland Collaring the Real Criminals, the Banksters*

IMF and EU Taking Ireland for Everything it’s Got*

Irish Shops Urged to Remove Produce from Israel*

Bank of Ireland Bans “Small” Cash Withdrawals*

U.K. Economy Ranked Below Zimbabwe by World Economic Forum*

Bank Bail-outs Behind Behind U.K.’s Collapsing Public Services*

The U.S. is Back in Recession with Interest Rates Already at Zero*

How Tanzanians are Hacking the Energy Crisis*

How Tanzanians are Hacking the Energy Crisis*

Over 600 million people in sub-Saharan Africa have no power electricity, yet it is life as normal. In the United Republic of Tanzania, the energy crisis is worse.

Could you perform a medical operation in the dark? Recho somehow makes it work.

Over 600 million people in sub-Saharan Africa are not letting Africa’s energy crisis stop them. Hear their inspiring stories here:

Posted by Discovery News on Friday, November 20, 2015

Doctors use flashlights of their mobile phones to help pregnant women deliver babies; when kerosene is available they use lanterns. Even to charge their mobile phones at charging stations, some of the residents pay as much as 20 cents. Students read under the kerosene lamps to make their and their community’s lives a better and brighter future, even if that means teary and painful eyes; they don’t let darkness hold them back, they can’t give up. Entrepreneurs are holding fort despite challenges; rolling blackouts mean businesses must pay for expensive generators to keep the power going.”

A mobile phone charging station in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania


Hussein Mwende, 18, studies by kerosene lamp because his home has no electricity

Seeker Network’s Laura Ling met several Tanzanians who are determined to make it work, despite the lack of power. Mercy Kitomari, who owns a gelato shop in Tanzania, described her business as a point of inspiration for fellow Tanzanians.

People tell me we’re looking at you, don’t you dare give up. And I think of those things when there’s power outage, just smile and carry on because if I give up, I let them down.”

Although, Tanzania is blessed with many alternative power sources such as wind, natural gas, hydro, solar, solid and liquid water, geothermal and nuclear, which, if fully utilized could produce enough electricity for local consumption and regional export; there is a power crisis that is plunging the entire country into total darkness intermittently.


Related Topics:

Tanzanian Maasai Villagers Win Fight for Information about Land-Grabs and Forced Eviction*

Operation Protective Edge: Life without Water and Electricity*

Israel Blocking Repair of Gaza Electricity Grids*

An Incredible System that Generates Electricity from Living Plants*

Montana Tribes Celebrate Purchase of Hydroelectric Dam*

Canadian Aborted Babies Used to Facilitate Electricity*